Dear Dr.

Kammen, I have read several of your papers you published representing the Energy Resources Group and I am aware that you are a steadfast proponent for proactive strategy development to address the "alarming" issue of global warming. I have done research on the findings of scientists on both sides of the fence on this issue and I do believe, with respect to your obvious intellect and personal opinion, that climate change is in fact a myth. A myth that has been constructed to scare groups and individuals into altering their behaviour on a fundamental level, a method of social control transcending age, race, religion, social or financial status. A myth which has precipitated reactions from governments and policy makers across the globe, precipitating the evolutions of systems of laws and tiers of beaurocracy that have been put in place for the purpose of extracting assets from the poor and distributing them to faceless government branches and corporations whose task is "reducing carbon pollution. So called experts scaring the uniformed into supporting regulation of their freedom in an attempt to abate a disaster that the scientific experts of our time arent even sure will eventuate. I will begin with a reiteration of my hypothesis; global warming is a myth. This is to say, the presenting truth contained within the FACTS derived from research and data collated and published by field experts of all persuasions, that there is no proof (FACTS supporting a theory) that Global warming is either true in the first instance, or that should it occur would it have any noticeable (let alone negative) effect on the ecological systems of the planet. The systematic monitoring of global temperature, weather patterns, natural disasters and precipitation began just over 100 years ago. Much has been learnt but there is far more to be discovered in this area than is currently known. What is required to accurately assess the issue of global warming is an independent grant funded program with the task of gathering and collating data from around the globe in metropolitan, suburban, rural and uninhabited areas (including the oceans). This program is simply for the purpose of gathering data and has no other function. With decades of this accurate and impartial data at its disposal the scientific fraternity would be far more capable of assessing the existence of global warming and its possible impacts. Currently situation with global warming research is many different groups all using different sources and methods making a plethora of discoveries, all concealing and protecting their data and research (many meteorological data collection facilities are military). There is little to no cooperation or common conclusion concerning even the simplest element of the Global warming theory: How

much CO2 is produced by human activity. If we are not even able to assess the amount of pollution that is being produced, how are we able to develop a complex theory based on the impact of this pollution, or develop policies to reduce the amount of pollution. We need to incubate and care for the egg (gather accurate and relevant data) and allow it to hatch (using the data gathered form an impartial and accurate opinion), rather than sewing pieces of chicken together (gathering all different sorts of data and partially formed theories and cramming them into one "global warming theory"), zapping it with a car battery and creating a "Franken Chicken" (Gathering support from governments and corporations and waging war on CO2). One cannot be certain of the motivation of the groups behind the perpetration of this deception. The global nature of the topic impedes most efforts to isolate a particular group or common thread linking the major proponents of the theory, other than a mutually shared appreciation of specific analysis of certain key world events and corresponding scientific theories that are signs posts pointing towards the possibility of a warming planet. What is certain is the level of influence these groups and individuals hold within our parliaments, universities, public service sectors, schools and publishing companies. What we are seeing is an application of a social control mechanism applied from a great height with cooperation from the media, parliament and a number of influential groups and individuals. Some have described it as an apocalyptic fear campaign with the purpose of controlling the individuals within our society with the fear of a crisis that would threaten their way of life; A Doomsday Clock. This could have any number of effects ranging from complex to baseline behaviour manipulation. Simple reactions emerging from the mechanism could include unification of the global society against the threat (in this case pollution and/or carbon emissions) which we know is already occurring. Another more complex effect of this type of social control is the increased pressure on individual obedience and a conditioning of the socially contracted to participate in the capitalists regimes efforts to open up new markets exploiting fear of the new threat. This resulting pressure is exerted upon all classes however extends more to the upper working classes who operate on a level incorporating social concern and a focus on the wellbeing of the society. These are the individuals from whom political, social and financial revolution spreads; the educated working class who are dissatisfied with the current establishment. As the focus is shifted from problem inherent within the establishment to the task at hand, Winding back the Doomsday Clock, the establishment consolidates its position. The irony of the situation is that the great minds whose task it is to drive the public to progress are complicit within

the Global Warming deception. Instead of calling for reforms we are being redirected to a false threat to our freedom. The real threat to our freedom is the deification of atmospheric health and the consequential regulation of our rights. Global warming is a myth. Like all good myths it has a great enemy (CO2), a heaven (a future without Hawaii underwater) and a hell (a future with Hawaii underwater). All that remains is the role of the saviour. Who will rescue the whole world from itself? Like most myths, Global warming theory exists to control those who believe it. However as the myth grows to a religious scale it begins to push the envelope and impact on those who dont believe it. We now have an opinion impacting on policy and good governance. Church and state are separate but there is a new player; Science. Will we need to take steps in the future to separate State from Science? What lessons will we learn in the next few decades about separation of powers and the impact that unproven theories can have on our society. I hope that this letter opens up a wondrous dialogue between the two of us, Dr. Kammen. Please do not take any of my assertions as insult as that is surely not my intent. I await your response with great anticipation as I long to hear you explain your point of view in relation to the issues I have raised.