Discussion Force Vibration Abos

MOHD AIDIL MUNIR BIN KHIDER
2009617152
RESULT
Experiment
Position Value
Open
Damper Distance,
b (mm)
0
Open
150
Closed
150
Closed
550
Experiment 1: For no damper, b= 0 (Open)

Data Recorded:
Mass beam = 1.68 kg.
Mass unbalance = 0.772 kg.
Beam, L = 700 mm @ 0.7 m.
a = 650 mm @ 0.65 m.
k = 3.0N/mm @ 3000M/m.
SAMPLE CALCULATION:
1) Angular natural frequency,
)(
(
)
)
2009617152
2) Natural frequency,
)(
3) Period,
)(
)(
)
)
4) Unbalanced Force,F0
F0 = mass unbalance x a x
= 0.772 x 0.65 x 67.962
= 2.318 KN
5)
For
2009617152
2.0
Amplitudes, x,
(mm)
0.0
12.566
5.41
0.0
3.0
0.0
18.85
3.05
0.0
4.0
0.0
25.133
2.70
0.0
5.0
0.05
31.416
2.16
0.065
6.0
0.05
37.699
1.80
0.065
7.0
0.075
43.982
1.55
0.097
8.0
0.15
50.265
1.35
0.194
8.1
0.2
50.894
1.33
0.259
8.2
0.2
51.522
1.32
0.259
8.3
0.3
52.150
1.30
0.388
8.4
0.4
52.779
1.29
0.517
8.5
0.4
53.407
1.27
0.517
8.6
0.65
54.035
1.26
0.841
8.7
1.05
54.664
1.24
1.358
8.8
1.45
55.292
1.23
1.876
8.9
1.2
55.920
1.22
1.552
9.0
0.8
56.549
1.20
1.035
10.0
0.25
62.832
1.08
0.323
11.0
0.15
69.115
0.98
0.194
12.0
0.1
75.398
0.90
0.129
13.0
0.05
81.681
0.83
0.065
14.0
0.05
87.965
0.77
0.065
Frequency, f
Table 4.1.1.1: Data for Experiment 1
2009617152
Experiment 2: For damper, b= 150mm (Open)
Data Recorded:
Beam, L = 700 mm @ 0.7 m.
a = 650 mm @ 0.65 m.
Damper constant, d = 5 Ns/m.
k = 3.0N/mm @ 3000M/m.
1) Moment of Inertia, I0
)(
2) Degree of damping, D
( )(
(
)
)(
3) Damped Oscillation,
2009617152
2.0
Amplitudes, x,
(mm)
0.0
12.566
5.41
0.0
3.0
0.0
18.85
3.05
0.0
4.0
0.0
25.133
2.70
0.0
5.0
0.0
31.416
2.16
0.0
6.0
0.0
37.699
1.80
0.0
7.0
0.0
43.982
1.55
0.0
8.0
0.05
50.265
1.35
0.065
8.1
0.05
50.894
1.33
0.065
8.2
0.05
51.522
1.32
0.065
8.3
0.1
52.150
1.30
0.129
8.4
0.1
52.779
1.29
0.129
8.5
0.1
53.407
1.27
0.129
8.6
0.1
54.035
1.26
0.129
8.7
0.1
54.664
1.24
0.129
8.8
0.1
55.292
1.23
0.129
8.9
0.1
55.92
1.22
0.129
9.0
0.15
56.549
1.20
0.194
10.0
0.15
62.832
1.08
0.194
11.0
0.15
69.115
0.98
0.194
12.0
0.15
75.398
0.90
0.194
13.0
0.15
81.681
0.83
0.194
14.0
0.15
87.965
0.77
0.194
Frequency, f
Table 4.1.2: Data for experiment 2
2009617152
Experiment 3: For damper, b= 150mm (Closed)
Data Recorded:
Beam, L = 700 mm @ 0.7 m.
a = 650 mm @ 0.65 m.
k = 3.0N/mm @ 3000M/m.
(
(
)(
)
)(
2009617152
2.0
Amplitudes, x,
(mm)
0.0
12.566
5.41
0.0
3.0
0.0
18.85
3.05
0.0
4.0
0.0
25.133
2.70
0.0
5.0
0.0
31.416
2.16
0.0
6.0
0.0
37.699
1.80
0.0
7.0
0.0
43.982
1.55
0.0
8.0
0.0
50.265
1.35
0.0
8.1
0.0
50.894
1.33
0.0
8.2
0.0
51.522
1.32
0.0
8.3
0.0
52.150
1.30
0.0
8.4
0.0
52.779
1.29
0.0
8.5
0.0
53.407
1.27
0.0
8.6
0.0
54.035
1.26
0.0
8.7
0.0
54.664
1.24
0.0
8.8
0.0
55.292
1.23
0.0
8.9
0.0
55.92
1.22
0.0
9.0
0.0
56.549
1.20
0.0
10.0
0.15
62.832
1.08
0.194
11.0
0.15
69.115
0.98
0.194
12.0
0.1
75.398
0.90
0.129
13.0
0.1
81.681
0.83
0.129
14.0
0.1
87.965
0.77
0.129
Frequency, f
2009617152
Experiment 4: For damper, b= 550mm (Closed)
Data Recorded:
Beam, L = 700 mm @ 0.7 m.
a = 650 mm @ 0.65 m.
k = 3.0N/mm @ 3000M/m.
(
(
)(
)
)(
2009617152
2.0
Amplitudes, x,
(mm)
0.0
12.566
5.37
0.0
3.0
0.0
18.85
3.46
0.0
4.0
0.0
25.133
2.68
0.0
5.0
0.0
31.416
2.15
0.0
6.0
0.0
37.699
1.79
0.0
7.0
0.0
43.982
1.53
0.0
8.0
0.0
50.265
1.34
0.0
8.1
0.0
50.894
1.33
0.0
8.2
0.0
51.522
1.31
0.0
8.3
0.0
52.150
1.29
0.0
8.4
0.0
52.779
1.28
0.0
8.5
0.0
53.407
1.26
0.0
8.6
0.0
54.035
1.25
0.0
8.7
0.0
54.664
1.23
0.0
8.8
0.0
55.292
1.22
0.0
8.9
0.0
55.92
1.21
0.0
9.0
0.0
56.549
1.19
0.0
10.0
0.0
62.832
1.07
0.0
11.0
0.05
69.115
0.98
0.065
12.0
0.05
75.398
0.89
0.065
13.0
0.05
81.681
0.83
0.065
14.0
0.05
87.965
0.77
0.065
Frequency, f
2009617152
Figure 4.1: Graph
versus
2009617152
DISCUSSION:
Based on the graph that has been plotted, it approve that the damper is
reducing the vibration period and amplitude. The distance of the lever arm b is also
effected the vibration as the distance of the damper came closer to beam, the
vibration that cause by the exciter has been hugely reduced. Most of the experiment,
the oscillation will occur when the frequency reached 4 Hz.
The plot of the result almost gets the same wave between them, which is get
high amplitude between 7 until 9 of frequency. The higher amplitude that we get is
from experiment 1 which is without damper. But the result is totally changed when we
do the experiment 2, 3, and 4 with damper. The value of amplitude is hugely
reduced. In case to compare the result between different positions of needle valve,
the amplitude of open needle valve is higher compare with close needle valve like we
did in experiment 2 and 3.In experiment 4 using close needle valve, we get to
minimize the value of amplitude with increasing the value of distance lever arm b.
That is the comparison between experiment 3 and 4.
The result maybe not so accurate because of several reasons.
The marker (ball pen) is not 100% suit with its holder at mechanical
recorder. This apparatus should have its own marker to get the
accurate data.
The control unit is being control manually by human.
The graph paper not smoothly rotates. These mechanical disadvantage

hopes can be minimizing in the future for us to get a better result.
2009617152
CONCLUSION:
In conclusion, the objective of all this four experiment is achieved. The

resonances can be seen in different damping condition and different length. In order
to reduce the errors, some consideration has to be taken to improve the experiment.
In my opinion, this universal vibration system should its own marker (constant) to
record the data in order to get more accurate result. Therefore, it will reduce all the
errors from occur. Lastly, during taking the data make sure the equipment is been
setting like in lab sheet before start the experiment.
REFERENCE
1) Vector Mechanical for Engineering DYNAMICS), Mc Graw Hill 8th Edition.
2) Vector Dynamics and Vibration, A. R. Zamri, UiTM
3) Acoustics, waves and oscillations, by S. N. Sen (Professor.)
4) Waves And Oscillations, R N Chaudhuri 2001
5) http://personal.cityu.edu.hk/~bsapplec/theoryof.htm
6) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vibration
7) http://www.roymech.co.uk/Useful_Tables/Vibrations/Free_Vibrations.html

Discussion Force Vibration Abos

Transféré par

Informations du document

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Discussion Force Vibration Abos

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

MOHD AIDIL MUNIR BIN KHIDER

Experiment 1: For no damper, b= 0 (Open)

1) Angular natural frequency,

MOHD AIDIL MUNIR BIN KHIDER

MOHD AIDIL MUNIR BIN KHIDER

Table 4.1.1.1: Data for Experiment 1

MOHD AIDIL MUNIR BIN KHIDER

Experiment 2: For damper, b= 150mm (Open)

MOHD AIDIL MUNIR BIN KHIDER

Table 4.1.2: Data for experiment 2

MOHD AIDIL MUNIR BIN KHIDER

Experiment 3: For damper, b= 150mm (Closed)

MOHD AIDIL MUNIR BIN KHIDER

Table 4.1.3: Data for experiment 3

MOHD AIDIL MUNIR BIN KHIDER

Experiment 4: For damper, b= 550mm (Closed)

MOHD AIDIL MUNIR BIN KHIDER

Table 4.1.4: Data for experiment 4

MOHD AIDIL MUNIR BIN KHIDER

Figure 4.1: Graph

MOHD AIDIL MUNIR BIN KHIDER

The control unit is being control manually by human.

The graph paper not smoothly rotates. These mechanical disadvantage

MOHD AIDIL MUNIR BIN KHIDER

In conclusion, the objective of all this four experiment is achieved. The

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi