1618 TP

Contents Market

Present Competition
Aggregate Brief

Present Competition
Aggregate wise Comparison with Competition

Product Superiority wrt Competition

Application Suitability on basis of TCO Comparison

Market Market Size (Approx) 6000

Segment

Sub Segment
Stone

Mining

Iron Ore Coal Sand Stone Chips Soil/Earth work Sand Stone Chips Soil/Earth work

Surface Transportation (Over Load) Surface Transportation (Fixed Load)

9500

9500

Total

25000
*As on FY 2011-12

Present Competition
Market Scenario
VECV, 2170, 9%

TML
LPK 1616

AL
U 1616

VECV
Terra 16 HDR

AL, 8446, 33%

SK 1616

U 1618

TML, 14639, 58%

LPK 1618
*As on FY 2011-12

AMW 1618 TP
Higher load carrying ability Better Pulling Power Climbing gradients with ease Strong and Rugged Aggregates Enhanced Aggregate Life

Higher Loads

Lower Maintenance Cost

More Earnings

Less Expenses

Higher Profits
More than 100 vehicles on road till date

Aggregate Brief
180 HP Cummins Engine . Clutch 380 mm dia SETCO.

6S Eaton HD Gear Box FGR-9.01 Suspension: Front-Semi elliptical leaf spring with shock absorber Rear-Semi elliptical leaf spring. Rear Axle Meritor MS 13 1497; RAR-6.17 Cabin- Hydraulic Tilt able AC Cabin. Tyres-10.00X20-16 PR Front 10.00X20-16 PR Rear Tipping Body- 8.5 and 10 Cum Box.

Double chassis HSLA Steel. Ladder type Bolted cross members. 256 x 75 x 7mm channel reinforced with inner channel section of 5mm thick. (same as AMW 2518 TP)

AMW 1618 TP- Grade ability 43% (highest in the category of 4X2 mass market Tipper)

Aggregate wise comparison with competition

Engine
AMW 1618 TP
178

Model

TML SK 1616
155

TML LPK 1616

155

TML LPK 1618

178

AL U 1616

AL U 1618

VECV Terra 16 HDR

147

Engine Power (max) Engine Torque (max)

160

180

675

630

630

675

550

660

471

AMW 1618 TP: 24Valves BSIII complaint engine for faster acceleration, better pick up & grade ability. Max. Power 178HP@2500rpm. Max. Torque- 675Nm@1500rpm. Service Reparability even by local mechanics.

AMW 1618 TP-Highest Engine Power and Torque in the category

Benefits Higher load carrying ability

Clutch
AMW 1618 TP
380

Model

TML SK 1616
352

TML LPK 1616

352

TML LPK 1618

380

AL U 1616

AL U 1618

VECV Terra 16 HDR

332

Clutch dia (mm)

355

380

AMW 1618 TP: 380 dia clutch for higher durability. Ceramic lining for long life. Clutch booster for fatigue free operation.

AMW 1618 TP - Largest Clutch Dia. in the category Benefits Higher load carrying ability Better clutch life Lesser Maintenance Cost

Gear Box

AMW 1618 TP Gear Box ES 9306 A 9.01 1st 5.27 2nd 3.22 3rd 2.04 4th 1.36 5th 1.00 6th 8.63 Rev Model

TML SK 1616 G 600

6.58 3.79 2.29 1.49 1.00 0.77 5.65

TML LPK 1616 G 600

6.58 3.79 2.29 1.49 1.00 0.77 5.65

TATA LPK 1618 G 750

8.47 4.87 2.94 1.92 1.28 1.00 7.28

ALL U ALL U 1616 1618 ZF S6 36 ZF 6S 850

8.28 4.70 2.75 1.64 1.00 0.84 7.25 8.51 4.66 2.73 1.78 1.27 1.00 7.64

VECV Terra 16 HDR ET 60 5S

7.74 4.71 2.60 1.58 1.00 7.74

AMW 1618 TP - Highest First Gear Ratio in the category Benefits Higher load carrying in gradients with Ease

Propeller Shaft

AMW 1618 TP-1710 Series (GB to rear Axle) TML, ALL and VECV- 1600 Series
AMW 1618 TP-Best in the category (Serrated flange) Benefits Serrated flange design helps direct power transmission which results in higher flange bolt life. (improved reliability)

Suspension

Model No. of leaves Thickness

AMW 1618 TP TML LPK 1616 Front 11 10 11-14 mm 10-14 mm Rear

Main

AL 1616 10 10-15 mm

VECV Terra 16 HDR 9 4-13 mm 5-16 mm

No. of leaves Thickness

11 8-16 mm 3-15 mm

13 4-14 mm 9-16 mm
Helper

13 13-13.5 mm

11 4-13 mm 7-16 mm

No. of leaves Thickness

5 5-15 mm

3 3-14 mm

9 9-11 mm

10 10-13 mm

Benefits No need to add leaves till 16T (payload) usage

Axle

Front Heavy Duty Forged I Section Reverse Elliot type.

Rear MS-13 1497 Single reduction hypoid gears, fully floating axle shafts. Ratio: 6.17.

Benefits Reliable Meritor rear axle suitable for higher loads

Frame

Double chassis HSLA Steel. Ladder type Bolted cross members. 265 x 75 x 7mm channel reinforced with inner channel section of 5mm thick.
Model
Frame Dimens ion (mm)

AMW 1618 TP
256X75X7 (inner channel 5 mm thick)

TML LPK 1616

286X65X7

TML LPK 1618

AL U 1616

AL U 1618

VECV Terra 16 HDR

285X76X6

286X65X7

275X90X6

275X90X6

AMW 1618 TP-Double chassis, best in the category Benefits Established AMW rugged chassis in tipper market. No chassis crack even at higher loads.

Load Body and Hydraulics

HYVA (FC110) Hydraulics with good service support. SRTRPN13Material used for body floor sheet. Improved underbody construction with increased no. of cross members.

Load Body Options- 8.5 & 10 Cum Box

Product Superiority-Specification Comparison

AMW vs TML
AMW 1618 TP
178
675 380 9.01 6.17

Parameters
Engine Power (HP) Engine Torque (Nm) Clutch Dia (mm)

TML LPK 1618

178
675 380 8.57 5.86

TML LPK 1616

155
630 352 6.58 6.83

TML SK 1616
155
630 352 6.58 5.86

First Gear Ratio

RAR TCD (mtr) Grade ability

14.3 43%

14.4 42%

14.4 31%

13.1 26%

TCD is better wrt TML LPK1616 and LPK 1618

AMW 1618 TP is distinctly superior wrt TML in all parameters

AMW vs AL

Parameters
Engine Power (HP) Engine Torque (Nm) Clutch Dia (mm) First Gear Ratio RAR TCD (mtr) Grade ability

AMW 1618 TP
178 675 380 9.01 6.17 14.3

AL U 1618
180 660 380 8.51 5.83 14

AL U 1616
160 550 355 8.28 5.57 13.2

43%

36%

27%

Grade ability is much higher wrt AL

AMW 1618 TP is distinctly superior wrt AL in all parameters

AMW vs VECV
VECV Terra 16 HDR
147 471

Parameters
Engine Power (HP) Engine Torque (Nm)

AMW 1618 TP
178 675

Clutch Dia (mm)

First Gear Ratio RAR TCD (mtr) Grade ability

380
9.01 6.17 14.3

332
7.736 6.857 12.8

43%

22.5%

Grade ability is much higher wrt VECV

AMW 1618 TP is distinctly superior wrt VECV in all parameters

Torque at Wheels (TAW)

Torque at Wheels
40000 35000 32745 Nm 30000
Torque (Nm)

37524 Nm 33503 Nm

28313 Nm Nm 25000 25827 24280 Nm 21567 Nm 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 1st 2nd

AMW 1618 TP

3rd Gear

4th

5th

6th

AMW 1618 TP

TML SK 1616

TML LPK 1616

TATA LPK 1618

ALL U 1616

ALL U 1618

TERRA 16 HDR

AMW 1618TP-Highest Torque at wheels in all gears. Benefits Higher load carrying in gradients with Ease

Application Suitability on basis of TCO Comparison

AMW 1618 TP vs VECV Terra 16 HDR, Stone Mining, Panvel Observations: AMW 1618 TP load carrying capacity is 27% higher wrt VECV Terra 16 HDR. AMW 1618 TP is 8% more fuel efficient than VECV Terra 16 HDR. AMW 1618 TP Capital cost is 23% higher wrt VECV Terra 16 HDR

TCO Benefits: TCO/Ton for AMW 1618 TP (Rs 37.5/Ton) is 22% less wrt VECV Terra 16 HDR (Rs 45.5/Ton) Extra Savings of Rs 15,19,564/- in 4 years as compared to competition

AMW 1618 TP is more suitable for mining/overloading applications

TCO Split

Maintenanc Driver e cost Expenses 4% 7%

AMW 1618 TP

Tyre Cost 2%

TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP

Location
Application Model

Panvel Stone Mining

AMW 1618 VECV Terra TP 16 HDR
Diesel Cost 43%

Capital Cost 38% Vehicle Registration Fees Interest Lost 0.33% in Down downpayme Insurance Payment nt @8% Premium 3% 1% 2% Tyre Cost 2%

Total Cost of ownership over life cycle period Fixed Cost 2,715,833 Operational Cost 3,582,000 Total Cost 6,297,833 Total running over life cycle period (km) 84,000 Total payload carried over life cycle 168,000 period (T) TCO (Rs/T) 37.49 AMW 1618 wrt VECV Terra 16 HDR 22% (TCO% Rs/T) Revenue Freight Rate (Rs/T) 50 Net profit/Ton (Rs/T) 12.51 Net Profit/month 43,795

2,236,936 3,780,462 6,017,397 84,000 132,000 45.59

Driver Expenses 7% Maintenance cost 4%

VECV Terra 16 HDR

Capital Cost 32% Diesel Cost 48%

50 4.41 12,138

Insurance Premium 3%

Down Payment Interest Lost 3% Vehicle in Registration downpayme Fees nt @8% 0.35% 1%

Why 1618 TP??

More Power Higher Torque at wheels More Load carrying ability Climbing gradients easily

High grade ability

More Earnings

Less Expenses

Strong Clutch Heavy Duty Gear Box Rugged Axle Double Frame

More reliability and vehicle availability

Better Aggregate Life

Application Suitability Matrix

Segment

Sub Segment
Stone

AMW 1618 TP

aMining aSurface Transportation

(Over Load)

Iron Ore
Coal Sand Stone Chips Soil/Earth work

a a a a a a

Applications which are not recommended are - surface transportation (rated load) of sand, stones, soil (earthwork) etc.

THANK YOU
THANK YOU