Preslia, Praha, 74: 97186, 2002

97

Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

Katalog zavleench druh flry esk republiky

Petr P y e k , Ji S d l o & Bohumil M a n d k

The first author dedicates this paper to the memory of his father Antonn Pyek

Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ-252 43 Prhonice, Czech Republic, e-mail: pysek@ibot.cas.cz
Pyek P., Sdlo J. & Mandk B. (2002): Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic. Preslia, Praha, 74: 97186. Alien flora of the Czech Republic is presented. In Appendix 1, 1378 alien taxa (33.4% of the total flora) are listed with information on the taxonomic position, origin, invasive status (casual, naturalized, invasive; a new category post-invasive is introduced), time of immigration (archaeophytes vs. neophytes), habitat type invaded (natural, seminatural, human-made), vegetation invaded (expressed as occurence in phytosociological alliances), mode of introduction into the country (accidental, deliberate), and date of the first record. Number of phytogeographical as well as biological and ecological attributes were compiled for each species in the database; its structure is presented in Appendix 2 as a suggestion for similar work elsewhere. Czech alien flora consists of 24.1% of taxa which arrived before 1500 (archaeophytes) and 75.9% neophytes. There are 891 casuals, 397 naturalized and 90 invasive species. Of introduced neophytes, 21.9% became naturalized, and 6.6% invasive. Hybrids contribute with 13.3% to the total number of aliens, and the hybridization is more frequent in archaeophytes (18.7%) than in neophytes (11.7%). If the 184 hybrids are excluded from the total number of aliens, there are 270 archaeophytes and 924 neophytes in the Czech flora, i.e. total of 1195 taxa. Accidental arrivals account for 53.4% of all taxa and deliberate introduction for 46.6%; the ratio is reversed for neophytes considered separately (45.5 vs. 54.5%). Majority of aliens (62.8%) are confined to human-made habitats, 11.0% were recorded exclusively in natural or seminatural habitats, and 26.2% occur in both types of habitat. Archaeophytes and neophytes occur in 66 and 83 alliances, respectively, of the phytosociological system. Flora is further analysed with respect to origin, life histories, life forms and strategies. Only 310 species (22.4% of the total number of all alien taxa) are common or locally abundant; others are rare, based on a single locality or no longer present. The following 19 taxa are reported as new for the Czech alien flora: Agrostis scabra, Alhagi pseudalhagi, Allium atropurpureum, Bromus hordeaceus subsp. pseudothominii, Carduus tenuiflorus, Centaurea gerstlaueri, Centaurea nigra phrygia, Cerastium maureri, Gilia capitata, Helianthus strumosus, Hieracium pannosum, Hordeum leporinum, Oenothera coronifera, Papaver atlanticum subsp. mesatlanticum, Parietaria pennsylvanica, Polypogon fugax, Rodgersia aesculifolia, Sedum pallidum var. bithynicum, Sedum stoloniferum; these represent results of our own field research as well as of herbaria search, and unpublished data from colleagues. Other 44 taxa are reported as escaping from cultivation for the first time. Twenty two archaeophytes are listed in the Red List of the Czech flora. K e y w o r d s : Alien flora, complete list of taxa, immigration status, casual, naturalized, invasive, time of immigration, abundance, mode of introduction, habitat type, hybridization, life history, life form, life strategy, taxonomy, species characteristics, Czech Republic

Introduction The core of modern research in plant invasions is in ecological studies, fuelled by an effort to predict invasiveness of particular species and vulnerability of various communities to

98

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

invasions. In the last decade, the field became fully comparable with other areas of modern ecology and hard theories appear to emerge (Rejmnek 1996, Rejmnek & Richardson 1996, Lonsdale 1999). The focus on ecology reflects the fact that studies on invasions are among biological disciplines with the strongest practical appeal and recently, this aspect has become its focal point. Papers devoted to impact and its quantitative description as well as to critical evaluation of prediction possibilities have been published recently (e.g. Daehler & Carino 2000, Williamson 1996, 1999, 2001, Kolar & Lodge 2001, Pyek 2001). Debate on risks associated with GMOs as a subset of potentially invasive taxa further increases practical importance of the field (Regal 1986, Kowarik 2002). Nevertheless, despite increasing focus on experimental approaches papers comparing species lists are a popular and useful tool, especially for generating hypotheses which can be then tested by experimental and comparative methods (Weber 1997, Daehler 1998). Importance of taxonomy for studies of alien flora has been repeatedly stressed and awareness of this has been increasing, too (McNeely 2001). In a field like this, where species move dynamically over the globe and one of the frequent and basic situations workers have to face is determination of a species new to their region, and often coming from distant areas, quality background data are needed. Having a reliable database of alien species of a given territory, summarizing historical knowledge of generations of botanists, may therefore prove as a very useful tool. Some information on alien floras is available for many European countries (see e.g. Weber 1997), although the quality of such data is highly variable. Generally, there is a remarkable difference between data drawn from standard floras and checklists commenting on species immigration status and studies focussing specifically on alien plants. Williamson (2002) has shown for the British flora how careful one must be when trying to make conclusions about the number of native species; numbers of aliens are undoubtedly even more difficult to estimate. Particular sources often give very different figures (Williamson 2002). In Europe, the best available data on alien flora, in terms of completeness of the species list, is that of the British Isles (Clement & Foster 1994, Ryves et al. 1996). This data set, in association with databases of biological attributes available for British flora (Fitter & Peat 1994) and geographical information, proved to be a powerful tool and yielded interesting results explaining the pattern of alien floras (Crawley et al. 1996). A comprehensive list of alien species with floristic status, degree of naturalization, date and mode of introduction, and chorological, biological and ecological data will be soon available for Germany (Kuehn & Klotz 2002). Moreover, detailed information on the structure and composition of alien flora, its historical dynamics and factors underlying its development have been available for Germany, too (see Kowarik 2002 and references therein). Switzerland is another European country with solid information on its alien flora (Weber 1999), and a project on this topic has started in Italy (Celesti Grapow, pers. com.). For Poland, a detailed information is available for a subset of alien species, i.e. archaeophytes (Zajac 1979). Detailed alien floras have been published for number of large European cities which are recognized as extremely species-rich centres of aliens (Pyek 1998a), but complete catalogues of alien species for particular countries are still rather rare, unlike in other parts of the world more affected by plant invasions (e.g. Wells 1986 for South Africa).

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

99

Geographical conditions in the Czech Republic, history of human colonization and its relevance to plant invasions The Czech Republic covers an area of 78, 864 square kilometers and has 10.3 million inhabitants, creating a human population density of 131 inhabitants per km2. The network of roads (0.71 km per km2) and railways (0.11 km per km2) is rather dense. These features certainly contribute to the richness of alien flora (Pyek & Prach 2002). Several historical and geographical factors have significantly affected the course of human-induced plant invasions over the past 6 000 years: 1. The Czech Republic is an ecotone between large continental landscape sections: the Alps on the south, Carpathians on the east, Pannonian basin located southeast, region of oceanic climatic on the west, and the north-located region of low habitat diversity resulting from the Quarternary glaciation. There are number of natural and human-created migration routes which provide possibilities for colonization; these are oriented E-W, and SE-NW. Many species reach their northwestern distribution limits near SE political boundaries of the Czech Republic (Slavk 1988). 2. Compared to similar regions of Central and Western Europe, the landscape mosaic is diverse and remarkably heterogeneous in the Czech Republic. Diverse geological, soil and climatic conditions create suitable environments for many different types of plants (Hejn & Slavk 1988), and the majority of Central-European habitat types are present (except for coastal and alpine habitats). The human impact and types of land-use are also rather heterogeneous, both on historical time scale and recently. 3. The dynamics of plant migrations are similar to those in other central- and western-European regions; there has been a continuous stream of plant invasions since the Neolithic agricultural colonization which started in about 5300 B. C. and represented the first milestone in the history of alien plant invasions. The main landscape changes that accompanied particular plant invasion waves followed during the Aeneolite (3800 B. C.), Bronze Age (2200 B. C.) (Opravil 1980), Medieval (13th to 15th century), and recent time (since the 19th century). As early as the Aeneolite, there was a rather high proportion of deforested landscape in lowlands (Loek 1999), and divergent development dividing the landscape into warm cultural lowlands and cold forested highlands started during this period. The landscape was gradually colonized between the Neolithic period (Central Bohemia, South Moravia) and the Medieval (cold highlands), but the highest mountains were only colonized between the 17th to 19th century. Until the Late Medieval, there were still large portions of closed forests and these acted as barriers to migrations. 4. There was little and very local exchange of goods until the beginning of the Late Medieval. Not until this period were there developed towns and large scale migration of humans and goods (Le Gof 1982), although trading routes specialized on salt, gold and amber were used in prehistoric times. The industrial revolution started in the region in 1850s and in the first half of the 20th century, the Czech Republic was one of the most highly developed industrial countries in Europe. In 19451989 the country was isolated from the Western Europe because of the socialistic political regime which brought about economic orientation towards the East and specific features of land-use (including so-called collectivization, involving the concentration of agricultural production into large production units, and the evacuation of border areas and their subsequent colonization). Many plant species of Asian and southeast-European origin entered the

100

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

central part of the continent via one of the largest European railway stations in ierna nad Tisou in the Slovak part of the former Czechoslovakia (Jehlk & Hejn 1974, Jehlk 1998). Besides railways and roads, river traffic on the Elbe river, the Danube river and their tributaries significantly contributed to the richness of present alien flora (Jehlk1998). 5. Despite isolation and political differences, the country went through the same process as other European regions between the 1940s and 1990s. Traditional economical and land-use models based on Neolithic scheme have ceased (Hobsbawm 1991). A new landscape type came to a large-scale existence since the 1990s. This landscape model can be characterized by the following features in the Czech Republic: (i) humans are less present in the open landscape, (ii) direct human intervention into the landscape are less frequent but more powerful, (iii) environmental stress associated with traditional agricultural management has been decreasing, (iv) the role of disturbances associated with industrial activities and urbanization increases, and (v) so do the migration possibilities (Clek 1999, Sdlo & Storch 2000).

History of floristic research and its relevance to studies on alien species The remarkable tradition of studies on floristics in the Czech Republic provides a solid background for compiling a list of alien species of reasonable historival relevance. Floristic research in the territory of the Czech Republic dates back to the second half of the 18th century. The first attempt at producing the flora of the whole Czechia was carried out by Schmidt (17931794); unfortunately some data given by him are doubtful (Skalick et al. 1988). In the first half of the 19th century, several floral works mention introduced plants and can be therefore used to infer information about plant invasions at that time (Pohl 1809, Presl & Presl 1819, Opiz 1823, 1852). For the following period, the wealth of information on alien plants can be found in the remarkable work of elakovsk (18671881, 18821894) who recognized the alien status and origin of some plants present in the Czech flora and commented in considerable detail on their distribution. In the early 20th century botanists started to recognize human-made and disturbed habitats as a source of important additions to native floras (e.g. Laus 1908, Domin 19171919). Alien plants started to be systematically recorded, thanks to the founding of a specialized research section at the Institute of Botany, Prhonice, in the 1960s. Research triggered then has focussed on specific habitats (ports, railways, oilseed or wool processing factories, grain silos, mills, rubbish tips, arable land, etc.), taxonomically relevant groups and on the distribution of alien plants, as well as on their ecology and impact (see Hejn et al. 1973, Pyek 1995a, Jehlk 1986, 1998 for references). The tradition of recording plant distribution made it possible to produce some valuable data sets providing detailed information on distribution of selected alien species (e.g. Jehlk 1998); unfortunately, they were not always adequately analyzed. In addition to this primary research, valuable floristic information about species immigration status can be derived by a careful analysis of old floral works, some of which date to 1600 (Hendrych 2001). Surprisingly, despite this background, no comprehensive catalogue of alien plants occurring at the territory of the country has been available until now. The need for such a list has become more urgent as the research in plant invasions has been intensifying (Pyek &

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

101

Prach 2002), and comparative studies on alien floras started to receive considerable attention (Weber 1997). Until now, data for the territory of the Czech Republic used to be taken mostly from the work of Dostl (19481950, 1954, 1958) on which the importance of the reliability of the data can be demonstrated. The flora of Dostl (19481950) which became a modern standard for Czech botanists of the second half of the 20th century gives an indication of alien origin of 599 taxa. The vast majority of the taxa are neophytes, as Dostl did not consider archaeophytes as aliens. The 599 taxa listed by Dostl represent approximately 20% of the the flora (the total number of species was 3120; Dostl 1954). Of the neophytes reported in this flora, 109 were excluded from the present list for various reasons: they were re-classified as native (e.g. Acer tataricum, Plantago indica, Solanum alatum, Potentilla norvegica), reported erroneously as they probably never grew at the territory of the country (e.g. Cuscuta australis, Capsella rubella, Lupinus perennis, Erysimum perofskianum), or, most frequently, it is uncertain whether or not they ever escape from cultivation (e.g. Linaria purpurea, Mesembryanthemum crystallinum, Helianthus debilis, Ptelea trifoliata). This phenomenon certainly deserves more attention and careful analysis since the data from Dostls flora were taken as a basis for comparison with other regions (Pyek 1989) because there was no other source available. Given that there are 924 neophytes (excluding hybrids) listed in the present paper, which number reflects better the real situation, and only as few as 490 are common with the Dostls flora, the value of Jaccard coefficient of similarity between the two data sets is as low as 0.47. Even if we take into account the increase in the number of aliens in the Czech flora during the last four decades (Pyek et al. 2002) reflecting accelerated translocation of species over the Earth surface in the second half of the 20th century, the difference between the recent and former data sets is too big to be attributed only to such an explanation and indicates lower reliability of the earlier data. Moreover, the Dostls data set was for the territory of former Czechoslovakia which includes Slovakia. The species number in this larger region should be therefore higher. However, this fact influences the comparison of past and present alien floras in two contrasting ways: species introduced only to Slovakia are missing from the present data referring only to the Czech Republic but there are taxa whose native distribution ends in Slovakia and their occurrence in the Czech Republic is therefore secondary (e.g. Trifolium angulatum, Cotinus coggygria, Orobanche gracilis, Scutellaria altissima, Beckmannia eruciformis, Pulsatilla slavica, Silene viridiflora). Such taxa did not appear among aliens on Dostls list but are included on the present one. Different reliability of data in earlier floras is not the only reason for need to update lists of aliens of a given territory. Plant invasions are, by their very nature, extremely dynamic, and there is a constant influx of new species. Records of these newcomers are usually scattered in the local literature, much of which is not covered in international abstracting journals; such records are thus generally unavailable to international readers. An attempt to compile a list for any territory brings data to light which would otherwise be lost. Even very good and detailed floras do not pay the same attention to alien species; the quality of information and the attention paid namely to casual aliens varies. The reasons are that any such work must necessarily rely upon many contributors who feel differently about nonindigeneous members of floras, and also, publication of such works usually spans over a considerable time period. The Flora of the Czech Republic (Hejn & Slavk 19881992, Slavk 19952000) is no exception in this respect. However, a decade in the contemporary world is a lifetime in plant invasions!

102

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

A good species list is clearly the prime task of such a work; another important aspect is the kind of information associated with particular taxa on the list. Databases specifically focussed on alien species have an advantage, compared to standard floras, that such information can be compiled in a considerable detail (see Appendix 2).

Data sources The work Flora of the Czech Republic, of which 6 out of 8 planned volumes have been published, served as a general information source for that part of the flora which has been covered so far (Hejn & Slavk 19881992, Slavk 19952000). The newly prepared Key to the flora of the Czech Republic (Kubt et al. 2002) was also checked for the coverage of alien species. Earlier modern floral works from the second half of the 20th century were also critically evaluated (notably Dostl 19481950, 1954, 1958, 1989). The list of Opravil (1980) served as a basic source on residence time for species introduced before 1500. General information on biological and ecological attributes was further completed by using synthetic floral works from other regions (Tutin et al. 19641980, Frank & Klotz 1990, Stace 1991), and specialized compendia on chromosome numbers and ploidy levels (Mjovsk et al. 1987), dormancy and germination behaviour (Baskin & Baskin 1999), seed bank formation (Thompson et al. 1997), invasive behaviour elsewhere in the world (Clement & Foster 1994, Ryves et al. 1996, Frank & Klotz 1990, Kartesz & Meacham 1999), dispersal mode (Lhotsk & Chrtkov 1978, Lhotsk et al. 1987), endangernment and conservation status (Holub & Prochzka 2000), history of introduction (Hejn et al. 1973, Jehlk 1998), and planting and cultivation aspects (Walters et al. 19841989, Cullen et al. 19952000, Brickell 1989). For other information not given in these sources, we searched the primary literature (see References). We also used herbaria (mostly National Museum Prague PR, Charles Univeristy PRC, and Institute of Botany Prhonice PRA), unpublished information from colleagues, and results of our own field research in 19992001.

Terminology, approach, and classification measures Former floras and works related to plants non-native to the territory of the Czech Republic (see References) were considered when evaluating species status. However, each particular taxon was carefully re-assessed to confirm its native/alien status (Webb 1985, Pyek 1995b, Richardson et al. 2000), its invasive status (Richardson et al. 2000) and residence time. For this evaluation, knowledge of species ecology and habitats occupied was used, in association with historical dynamics and role it plays in the landscape. The knowledge of landscape history since Neolithic times was also employed (Loek 1999). All alien species ever recorded at the territory of the country at least once in the wild were included1. Another important condition for inclusion was that a species is alien to the
1

Only those species which occurred in the wild were considered; i.e. we did not take into account those kept exclusively in cultivation but considered escapees. In some cases, it can be rather tricky to decide; this concerns especially plants thrown away from gardens. We adopted the following criterion: a plant was included on the list if it reproduced on its own at least once outside the space where it was sown or planted (i.e. outside the flower bed or garden). In plants reproducing by seed, germination outside such space was considered as escape from cultivation. A plant reproducing clonally was considered as an escape from cultivation only if it survived winter and persisted in a given site until the following growing period.

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

103

Fig. 1a. Herbarium specimen of Angelica archangelica subsp. archangelica from 1893 (leg. J. Ko l PR). Presence of this neophyte at the territory of the Czech Republic has been proved as early as in 1517 (Slavk 1997).

104

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

Fig. 1b. Rodgersia aesculifolia, the most recent addition to the alien flora (2001). There is a span of more than four centuries and minimum 1044 species that have immigrated during the time between the introduction of Angelica archangelica subsp. archangelica and that of this species.

whole territory of the country. If a species has or had a single locality at the territory of the country where it is considered native, it was not included onto the list. Similarly, no consideration of so-called apophytes (native species occuring on secondary habitats, see e.g. Holub & Jirsek 1967) was given; once a species has native habitats in the Czech Republic, its expansion into other communities did not qualify it for inclusion on the list. Similarly, species which occurred at the territory as native in the past were excluded2. A strictly geographical approach to plant invasions, as opposed to one based on human values and relying on the realization of some form of impact (Davis & Thompson 2001), was therefore adopted (Rejmnek 1995, Richardson et al. 2000, Daehler 2001, Rejmnek et al. 2002). Doubtful records, which are sometimes listed without evidence from one flora to another, were excluded; we adopted a conservative approach. On the other hand, once a declaratively complete work on alien flora of any territory has been published, it is tempting for future researchers to start with that and pay less attention to scattered information sources from earlier times. This brings about a danger that most of what is not covered might be overlooked in the future. For that reason we included some records that are
2 Sorbus intermedia (Ehrh.) Pers. is an example of such an approach; this taxon is commonly planted and escapes from cultivation but its native occurrence in the Krkonoe Mts from the turn of the 19th and 20th century cannot be excluded (Kovanda in Hejn & Slavk 1992). For that reason, this species is not included in the list.

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

105

not steadfastly proved because the respective herbarium specimen is not available, but other circumstances, such as the personality of the author, make it probable that they were correctly determined (e.g. Hyoscyamus albus, see Slavk 2000)3. Crosses between natives and aliens are always considered as aliens, even if they have arisen in the Czech Republic. They are non-indigenous species in the sense of not having been at the territory before the onset of Neolithic agriculture (see also Williamson 2002). If a native species was taken into cultivation, its cultivars were produced and subsequently escape into the wild (e.g. Achillea ptarmica), such species was not included on the list because at the taxonomic levels considered in the present paper, i.e. species and subspecies, it is native in the territory (the only exception to this rule is rather common and well recognizable Phalaris arundinacea var. picta). For taxa which are covered by it, the nomenclature follows the determination key to the Czech flora (Kubt et al. 2002). To avoid confusion, authorities are consistently given in Appendix 1. Nomenclature of higher taxa follows the Cronquist system as presented in Mabberley (1997). We only distinguished taxa up to the intraspecific level of subspecies; the only exceptions are Reynoutria japonica (var. japonica vs. var. compacta), Physalis alkekengi (var. alkekengi vs. var. franchetii), Datura stramonium (var. stramonium vs. var. tatula), and Kochia scoparia subsp. scoparia f. trichophylla. The evaluation of the invasive status of a taxon, i.e. its stage in the naturalization-invasion process, should be a key point in any study dealing with alien floras. We followed the scheme proposed by Richardson et al. (2000), which is based on overcoming different kind of barriers an invading plant must face. The following categories were distinguished: casuals, naturalized, and invasive aliens4. On top of the standard classification introduced by Richardson et al. (2000), which describes the highest degree of invasiveness reached by a given species, we included another category which is supposed to reflect the historical dynamics, i.e. changes in a species invasive status. There is no reason to doubt that archaeophytes went, after their introduction, through processes similar to those we witness today with neophytes, and that their recent distribution is in many cases only a remnant of
In other cases, however, the support for inclusion was considered too weak. For example, Mibora minima (L.) Desv. has been reported as an adventive species of the Czech flora (Dostl 1989, based on Chrtek 1965). The record was based on a single herbarium specimen from the Zahlbrckner collection located in PRC (s.a., s.d.) who was not, however, the collector of this plant. The sheet bears location E Bohemia: Pohl in Zahlbrckners handwriting (J. Hadinec, pers. com.). Obviously, it is too risky to include the species on the basis of second-hand information without precise location. In addition, the species is native to the neighbouring Germany so even if it was collected in Bohemia, it might have represented native occurrence. Its unclear status is reflected by it being listed among uncertain cases of extinct and missing taxa of the Red list of the Czech flora (Holub & Prochzka 2000). 4 A l i e n p l a n t s : Plant taxa in a given area whose presence there is due to intentional or accidental introduction as a result of human activity. C a s u a l a l i e n p l a n t s : Alien plants that may flourish and even reproduce occasionally in an area, but which do not form self-replacing populations, and which rely on repeated introductions for their persistence. N a t u r a l i z e d p l a n t s : Alien plants that reproduce consistently (cf. casual alien plants) and sustain populations over more than one life cycle without direct intervention by humans (or in spite of human intervention); they often recruit offspring freely, usually close to adult plants, and do not necessarily invade natural, semi-natural or human-made ecosystems. I n v a s i v e p l a n t s : Naturalized plants that produce reproductive offspring, often in very large numbers, at considerable distances from parent plants (approximate scales: > 100 m / < 50 years for taxa spreading by seeds and other propagules; > 6 m / 3 yrs for taxa spreading by roots, rhizomes, stolons, or creeping stems), and thus have the potential to spread over a considerable area. After Richardson et al. (2000).
3

106

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

the past abundance and distribution. We made an attempt to take this into account by including a category post-invasive. Criteria for including archaeophytes as post-invasive were that the species now has a stable (not increasing) or even decreasing population and does not invade new, modern types of habitats, but its population dynamics and type of occurrence suggests that it might have belonged to the vegetation dominants in the past. Examples include: Atriplex rosea, Spergula arvensis, Agrostemma githago, Chenopodium polyspermum, or Gagea villosa (see Appendix 1). We also labelled some neophytes as post-invasive; this concerns species for which it is rather striking that, after having reached a distribution peak in the past, they either retreated or their distribution is more or less stable i.e., they no longer spread (e.g. Elodea canadensis, Mimulus guttatus, Imperatoria ostruthium). It should, however, be borne in mind that the post-invasive category is, more than any other, based on our personal opinion; it is therefore more speculative than the others. Nonetheless, we consider this term to be a useful and informative addition to the traditionally applied criteria of a species position within the dynamics of invasion process. When a species occurs in the locality for a long time, seemingly naturalized but it is there as a remnant of past planting (e.g. Rosa rugosa, Filipendula kamtschatica, Cotoneaster horizontalis, Potentilla fruticosa, Lonicera tatarica, etc.) it is termed cultivation relic and indicated in Appendix 1. With respect to the residence time, i.e. the time since the arrival of a species in the territory, we distinguish archaeophytes (introduced before the discovery of America, approx. 1500 A. D.) and neophytes (introduced after that date). Discussion is required here on how these terms were used by previous authors. Some terms were introduced by original sources in a slightly different sense but their meaning has shifted since then. This is most remarkable in the usage of the term neophyte. Strictly speaking, deliberately introduced species are not neophytes in the sense of e.g. Holub & Jirsek (1967) and should be termed xenophytes. For simplicity and compatibility with recent usage of the term, we use it without any relation to whether the given species arrived accidentally or was brought in by humans. It only reflects the residence time (species introduced after the year 1500) regardless of the mean of introduction. Terminological frameworks for classifying alien species by reflecting their relationship to humans as vectors of introduction, dispersal, and habitat transformation (e.g. Thellung 1905, Kreh 1957, Holub & Jirsek 1967, Schroeder 1969) are traditionally used in Central-European countries. We used the system of Richardson et al. (2000) because: (a) it is simpler than traditional classification schemes; still it is compatible with them (Table 1; Pyek 1995b). It differs in that it answers the basic classification questions5 by combining independent criteria, rather than creating specific terms for each possible situation. (b) It is being partly recognized by international scientific bodies such as Global Invasive Species Programme (McNeely 2001), hence it is a candidate for becoming generally acceptable basis for terminology in plant invasions. (c) The traditional Central-European classification of alien plants has never received notable recognition in English speaking scientific community; the terms archaeophytes and neophytes represent an exception in this respect (Williamson 2002). However, there are several categories, between which the distinction is sometimes blurred and depends, more than elsewhere, on the level of knowledge of species ecology
5

When did the species arrive? Why did it arrive, i.e. what means made it possible? Where does it invade, i.e. in which habitats? How far did it get in the invasion process?

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

107

Table. 1. Comparison of terminology associated with alien plants which has been traditionally used in Central-European classification schemes with the one adopted for the present paper. The former is based on the classification of Holub & Jirsek (1967), the latter on Richardson et al. (2000). Criteria used by Holub & Jirsek (1967) for classification of particular categories are indicated: T = time of immigration, M = means of introduction, H = type of encountered habitat. Term in Holub & Jirsek (1967) Anthropophytes I. Hemerophytes 1. Ergasiophytes 2. Ergasiophygophytes 3. Ergasiolipophytes M MH MH MH Criteria Meaning introduced by humans regardless of time and means introduced deliberately kept only in cultivation kept in cultivation and occassionally escaping formerly planted, currently occurring in the territory without need of human intervention accidentally (unintentionally) introduced accidentally introduced before ca. 15006 accidentally introduced after ca. 1500 occurring temporarily in human-made habitats established in human-made habitats established in the region, occurring in human-made habitats and penetrating to natural habitats, too Corresponding term in the present paper and its meaning alien

not included on the list deliberately introduced aliens (mostly casual) deliberately introduced aliens (naturalized or invasive)

II. Xenophytes 1. Archaeophytes

M MT

2. Neophytes

MT

(a) Ephemerophytes (b) Epekophytes

MTH MTH

(c) Neoindigenophytes7

MTH

any accidentally introduced alien archaeophytes (introduced before ca. 1500, both deliberately or accidentally) neophytes (introduced after ca. 1500, both deliberately or accidentally) neophytes in human-made habitats (casual) neophytes in human-made habitats (naturalized or invasive) neophytes in natural and/or seminatural habitats (naturalized or invasive)

and perception of landscape history. This includes a decision whether a species is (i) native or archaeophyte, (ii) archaeophyte or neophyte, as long as residence time is concerned, and (iii) casual or naturalized, and (iv) naturalized or invasive when classifying the invasive status. Some special cases have been considered in the present paper too. These include, for example, Oxalis debilis and O. latifolia, species which often spread in greenhouses of garden centres where they survive without being further dispersed by humans (Holub & Holubikov 1980, Jehlk 1995). However, such species were considered as casuals because of their dependence on glasshouse environment; the outdoor climate of Central Europe does not permit their persistence.
6 7

Approximate date corresponding to the discovery of America (1492). Some authors use the term agriophytes (Schroeder 1969, Lohmeyer & Sukopp 1002) for this category which is sometimes further divided into holoagriophytes (in natural vegetation) and hemiagriophytes (in seminatural vegetation) (see e.g. Kornas 1990).

108

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

Type of abundance in the landscape was estimated for each species on the list using the following criteria: single locality, rare, scattered, locally abundant, and common at the whole territory. A special category termed extinct relates to the situation when no records have been known for a long period, and where it is highly improbable that the species would appear again. In addition, estimates were made of the number of localities using the scale of Clement & Foster (1994): 14; 514; 1549; 50499; and at least 500 localities. Above 15, the number of localities is an estimate. The first record of the species in the territory was, for obvious reasons, only determined for neophytes. It shoud be noted, that this date tells us only that the species has been present in the territory since at least the given year. In fact, it could have been, and in many cases undoubtedly was, present for a longer time. This category crucially depends on earliest floras available, and on their quality and completeness. Fortunately, these are regularly spread over the 19th century (Pohl 1809, Presl & Presl 1819, Opiz 1823, 1852, elakovsk 18671894, Polvka 19001903) and provide us with solid information about the gradual enrichment of flora by alien species. For each species, types of habitat in which it is recorded were distinguished: (i) natural (forested lansdscape and naturally treeles habitats), (ii) seminatural (cultural landscape excluding arable land, communication and human settlements), and (iii) human-made habitats (Chytr et al. 2001). The type of invaded landscape was also evaluated, distinguishing (i) traditional agricultural landscape, and (ii) industrial urban landscape (Hobsbawm 1991). Particular habitats in which the species is found were classified according to the Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (1992). The type of invaded vegetation was assessed by using alliances of the Zrich-Montpellier phytosociological system (Chytr et al. 2001). This classification level most reasonably reflects the vegetation diversity of Central-European landscape (Ellenberg 1988).

The database Various characteristics have been compiled for each species, where such information was available. These can be divided into several topics: (i) species identity and taxonomic position, (ii) invasiveness, i.e. occurrence and behaviour of the species in the Czech Republic. These two topics were treated in detail in the previous section and represent the original information presented in this paper. Other two spheres concern (iii) ocurrence and behaviour in primary area, and (iv) biological and ecological attributes collated for each species (see Appendix 2 for details).

How many species, how large a proportion? The Czech alien flora contains 1378 taxa belonging to 542 genera and 99 families (Appendix 1). Of these, there are 141 taxa at subspecific and 12 at varietal levels; 54 subspecies and 5 varieties are the only representatives of their species. Of the total number of taxa, 184 are hybrids. This figure can be used to estimate the contribution of aliens to the total floristic richness of the territory of the Czech Republic. However, such estimates even with solid data at

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

109

hand, can be rather tricky and depend on several factors. As discussed by Williamson (2002), unfortunately not only numbers of aliens are uncertain but those of native species too, and the figure depends on whether microspecies and hybrids are included in calculations. Williamson (2002) argues that while hybrids are perfectly satisfactory taxa, and there are around 400 of them in British Isles, accounts of the British flora usually omit them. Stace (1997) estimates that there are around 900 native micro-species in British Isles, concentrated namely in genera Rubus, Hieracium or Taraxacum. Including hybrids and/or microspecies in the total of native species makes a huge difference to comparison with other regions; in the case of the relatively species-poor British flora, the total number of native species is about twice as high. Moreover, number of species reported in these critical groups strongly reflects the level of taxonomical knowledge in the country and/or simply the presence or absence of a specialist in a given group; this brings about even more bias to comparison between countries (Daehler & Carino 2001). The number of native taxa at species and subspecies level listed in the most recent account of the Czech flora (Kubt et al. 2002) is 27548. Microspecies were included in this count; there are good specialists for most critical groups in the Czech Republic and there has been sound research on apomictic species (e.g. Marhold et al. 1999). Kubt et al. (2002) list 114 species of Hieracium, 112 native species of Rubus and 72 species of Taraxacum9, to name the three most critical genera mentioned by Williamson (2002). Even if we bear in mind that not all of them are critical, as there are ordinary species in those genera as well, we are left with a total exceeding 300 species. The corresponding figures for native representatives of these genera in British flora are approximately 400, 250 and 115, respectively, i.e. giving the total of 765. The contributon of microspecies to the total richness of Czech flora seems to be therefore lower than in British Isles this is further pronounced by the fact that Czech native flora is richer in macrospecies than that of British Isles. For this reason, we consider it justified to include microspecies in the calculation. Accepting the totals of 1378 aliens and 2754 native species means that aliens contribute 33.4% to the total number of taxa reported for the Czech Republic. Kubt et al. (2002) list 498 crosses of native species so the number of native taxa excluding hybrids is 2256. The corresponding figure for the alien flora, excluding hybrids, is 1194. If the hybrids are not taken into account, contribution of aliens to the total number of taxa increases to 34.6%. This minor difference reflects the fact that hybridization rate is lower in aliens than in native species, possibly due to shorter common occurence of potential parental species in the territory, their often limited distribution and smaller population sizes, and resulting lower chance to meet; given the diversity of geographical origins among aliens, other barriers to hybridization may play role, too (Briggs & Walters 1997). The native flora is also better known because of tradition of floristic research and historical focus, and crosses of alien species might be therefore also under-recorded compared to those of native flora. A sound answer to the question how large a proportion of Czech flora is formed by aliens, seems to be between 33 and 35%, depending on how the species numbers are derived.

The counts are based on the final stage of manuscript kindly provided by the editors. They may therefore slightly differ from data contained in the printed version. 9 This count does not include sect. Ruderalia, of which there are another 105 species (J. Kirschner, pers. com.); total number of microspecies in the flora of the Czech Republic will be therefore somewhat higher.

110 Composition and structure of Czech alien flora

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

Of the total number of 1378 taxa in the Czech alien flora, 24.1% arrived before 1500, while 75.9% are neophytes (Table 2). As to the invasive status, 64.7% are casuals, 28.8% were classified as naturalized, and 6.6% as invasive (Fig. 2). Four neophytes and 188 archaeophytes were classified as post-invasive (Appendix 1). Of 891 casual taxa, 91.7% are neophytes and 8.3% archaeophytes; similarly, 76.7% of the total number of 90 invasive taxa are neophytes and 23.3% archaeophytes. The group of 397 naturalized taxa of the Czech alien flora consists of 59.7% of archaeophytes and 40.3% of neophytes (Table 2). The reverse ratio of casual and naturalized taxa in both residence-time groups (Fig. 2) reflects the fact that archaeophytes which would not have become naturalized could hardly be recorded in our times; the 74 casuals in this group represent long cultivated species escaping occasionally from cultivation. These figures make it possible to calculate ratios of how large a proportion of introduced plants is able to naturalize or invade (Fig. 3). It only makes sense to express this for neophytes because for archaeophytes, the information on the initial stage, i.e. that of casuals, is missing. Of introduced taxa, 21.9% are considered naturalized, while 817 are casuals, and 231 of them are considered extinct. Finaly, 6.6% of introduced neophytes are invasive, a figure which corresponds well to theoretical rules and predictions in invasion biology (Williamson 1996). The vast majority of archaeophytes came from the Mediterranean area, whereas neophytes have their origin in all continents, with other parts of Europe (39.8%), Asia (27.6%), and North America (15.1%) contributing most taxa (Fig. 4). The taxonomic structure of the alien flora involves families whose representatives commonly invade in temperate climates (Pyek 1998b), with Compositae, Gramineae, and Brassicaceae most represented (Table 3). Some differences between archaeophytes and neophytes are obvious: Chenopodiaceae, Apiaceae, Scrophulariaceae and Caryophyllaceae tend to be better represented among the former, whereas Fabaceae, Solanaceae, Polygonaceae, Onagraceae and Amaranthaceae are typical neophytic families. Compared to the native flora, Gramineae, Brassicaceae, Chenopodiaceae, and Solanaceae are over-represented among the aliens, whereas Rosaceae, Cyperaceae, Salicaceae, and Orchidaceae are those with remarkable contribution of native taxa (Fig. 5). Some large families contain almost exclusively native (e.g. Orchidaceae, 97 native species Kubt et al. 2002, and only one alien Cypripedium reginae) or exclusively alien (e.g. Amaranthaceae, 25 species) representatives. There are 39 families and 162 gen-

Table 2. Composition of the Czech alien flora. Number of taxa in particular categories of immigration time and invasive status (see text for definitions). Hybrids are included (for their numbers see Table 4). Distribution of archaeophytes and neophytes with respect to invasive status are significantly different (G-test on contingency tables, G = 379.04, df = 2, P < 0.001). Casual Archaeophytes Neophytes Aliens total 74 817 891 Naturalized 237 160 397 Invasive 21 69 90 Total 332 1046 1378

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

111
casual naturalized invasive

90 80 70 60
%

50 40 30 20 10 0 Archaeophytes Neophytes Aliens total

Fig. 2. Invasive status in groups of alien flora classified according to the immigration time.

era containing archaeophytes and 98 families and 477 genera (including one nothogenus) with neophytes in the Czech alien flora. The total number of families with native species is 138. The genera with the highest number of alien taxa are: Chenopodium (27), Amaranthus (24), Oenothera (23), Bromus (21), and Vicia (18). Annuals contribute to the total number of archaeophytes with 57.8%, significantly more than to that of neophytes (39.4%). Perennials (38.2%) and woody plants (14.1%) are more frequent among neophytes than among archaeophytes ( Fig. 6). In total, the Czech alien flora comprises 44.0% annuals, 9.3% biennials, 34.4% perennials, 7.7% shrubs and 4.5% trees. The distribution of Raunkiaers life forms (see e.g. Ellenberg 1988) in aliens is different from that in the native flora, with all groups except for therophytes and phanerophytes over-represented in the latter (Fig. 7).
231 of casuals (28.3%) are extinct

817 casual = 78.1% 1046 neophytes in total = 100% 229 naturalized = 21.9%

69 invasive = 30.1% of naturalized = 6.6% of the total

Fig. 3. Transition rates between particular categories of invasive status in Czech aliens (see text for explanation).

112
60

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

archaeophytes 50 40
%

neophytes

30 20 10 0 Europe 43.1 Asia 30.0 Africa 8.3 N America C America S America Australia 10.9 2.7 4.1 0.9

Fig. 4. Structure of the Czech alien flora with respect to origin. If a species distribution area covers more than one continent, it is considered as a representative of each of them. Percentage contribution of areas of origin to the total number of aliens follows the name of the continent.

Table 3. The most represented families in the Czech alien flora. Only those with percentage contribution to the total number of alien taxa (n = 1378) exceeding 1% are displayed. Archaeophytes and neophytes differed significantly with respect to the representation of plant families (G-test on contingency tables, G = 133.17, df = 35, P < 0.001, only families with at least 5 species were considered in calculation). Number of species Archaeophytes Compositae Gramineae Brassicaceae Fabaceae Rosaceae Lamiaceae Chenopodiaceae Apiaceae Scrophulariaceae Onagraceae Caryophyllaceae Solanaceae Polygonaceae Boraginaceae Amaranthaceae Ranunculaceae Malvaceae Violaceae Geraniaceae Liliaceae 52 38 29 13 16 18 22 17 15 0 17 3 2 11 2 5 6 7 5 1 Neophytes 135 113 72 76 62 46 33 24 24 38 20 33 27 14 23 18 14 10 11 14 Aliens 187 151 101 89 78 64 55 41 39 38 37 36 29 25 25 23 20 17 16 15 Archaeophytes 15.7 11.4 8.7 3.9 4.8 5.4 6.6 5.1 4.5 0.0 5.1 0.9 0.6 3.3 0.6 1.5 1.8 2.1 1.5 0.3 % Neophytes 12.9 10.9 6.9 7.3 5.9 4.4 3.2 2.3 2.3 3.6 1.9 3.2 2.6 1.3 2.2 1.7 1.3 1.0 1.1 1.3 Aliens 13.6 11.0 7.3 6.5 5.7 4.6 4.0 3.0 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.2 1.2 1.1

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

113

16

native (n = 2754)
14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0

alien (n = 1379)

% of the total number of taxa

Scrophulariaceae

Caryophyllaceae

Brassicaceae

Chenopodiaceae

Compositae

Onagraceae

Cyperaceae

Gramineae

Salicaceae

Fig. 5. Comparison of taxonomic structure of alien and native floras. The most represented families are arranged according to the decreasing contribution to the alien flora. Data on native flora were taken from Kubt et al. (2002). Alien and native floras significantly differed with respect to the representation of plant families (G-test on contingency tables, G = 865.41, df = 76, P < 0.001).

As shown previously on a limited data set (Pyek et al. 1995b), Grimes scheme of life strategies (Grime 1979) is a convenient predictor of invasive success. In contrasting environments, different life strategies are more likely to result in naturalization and invasion. The present data set shows that the C-strategy is a convenient one for naturalization but those species which possess combination of all three kinds of strategies have a better chance of becoming invasive (Table 4). The sometimes raised caution that the use of Grimes strategies brings about the danger of circular reasoning is not justified here since the invasive ability is a mixture of both capability to survive in disturbed habitats (typical of R-strategy) and to compete successfully (favoured by C-strategy). The question of which kind of life strategy favours invasion success is therefore a legitimate one, because the classification of species into particular strategies was not directly affected by the fact how good invader a species is. As to the mode of introduction, 49.9% of all aliens were introduced into the country accidentally, and 42.7% deliberately; the remaining 7.4% were likely introduced by both means (Table 5). If the last group is not considered separately but the species belonging to it are considered in both accidental and deliberate category, accidental arrivals account for 53.4% of taxa and deliberate introductions for 46.6%. Since most archaeophytes reached the country as agricultural weeds, i.e. not on purpose of humans, the ratio for total aliens is

Ranunculaceae

Polygonaceae

Orchidaceae

Solanaceae

Lamiaceae

Fabaceae

Rosaceae

Apiaceae

114
70 60 50
%

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

archaeophytes neophytes

40 30 20 10 0 Annual Biennial Perennial Shrub Tree

Fig. 6. Distribution of life histories in archaeophytes and neophytes. Species known to occur as more than one life history were considered as representatives of each of them. Distribution of life histories in archaeophytes was significantly different from neophytes (G-test on contingency tables, G = 64.24, df = 4, P < 0.001).

70 60 50 40 % 30 20 10 0 archaeophytes neophytes native

Thero

Hemi

Geo

Cham

Nano

Phanero

Fig. 7. Distribution of Raunkiaer life forms (see Ellenberg 1988 for definitions) in archaeophytes, neophytes, and native flora. Species exhibiting more than one life form were considered as representatives of each of them. Data on native flora were taken from Kubt et al. (2002). Thero = therophytes, Hemi = hemicryptophytes, Geo = geophytes, Cham = chamaephytes, Nano = nanophanerophytes, Phanero = phanerophytes. Distribution of life forms was significantly different between archaeophytes and neophytes (G = 52.83, df = 5, P < 0.001), and between aliens and native (G = 587.89, df = 5, P < 0.001).

biased towards accidental introductions. Neophytes, on the contrary, include many taxa planted on purpose and escaping from cultivation, hence the ratio is reversed: more were introduced deliberately (54.5%) than accidentally (45.5%). More than a half of taxa are cultivated as ornamentals, other frequently encountered purposes are for food, medical purpose, landscaping, and bee-keeping (Table 6).

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

115

Table 4. Distribution of Grimes life strategies according to residence time, and with respect to invasive status in neophytes. Data shown are percentages based on 288 classified archeophytes and 611 neophytes. Distribution of life strategies was significantly different between archaeophytes and neophytes (G = 94.58, df = 6, P < 0.001), and between aliens and native (G = 49.95, df = 12, P < 0.001). Neophytes Archaeophytes C CR CS CSR R S SR 15.3 35.4 2.8 8.3 31.3 0.0 6.9 Total 38.8 27.3 5.9 8.0 15.2 2.6 2.1 Casual 33.1 29.7 5.6 6.8 20.0 2.7 2.2 Naturalized 58.1 25.8 4.8 6.5 1.6 0.0 3.2 Invasive 47.4 20.7 7.4 12.6 6.7 3.7 1.5

Table 5. Structure of the Czech alien flora with respect to the presumed type of introduction into the country (deliberately or accidentally) and type of habitat. Number of taxa are shown for particular habitat/introduction categories. Natural and seminatural habitats (see text for definition) are grouped. Species occupying particular habitat types are significantly different with respect to the type of introduction (G-test on contingency tables, G = 48.35, df = 4, P < 0.001). Type of habitat
10

Type of introduction Accidental Both ways 61 34 7 102 Deliberate 315 178 93 586 Total 862 359 151

Human-made habitats Both types of habitats Natural/seminatural habitats Total

486 147 51 684

100
Accidental

80 60
%

Deliberate

40 20 0 Human Both (Semi)natural

Habitat type (land-use)

Fig. 8. Type of introduction of alien species into habitat types classified according to the land-use. Species which were introduced into the country by both means (see Table 5) are included in both groups. See Table 5 for details on the grouping of habitats.
10

Human-made = H in Appendix 1; Both = NSH, SH; Natural/seminatural = N, S, NS

116

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

Table 6. Deliberately introduced taxa of the Czech alien flora classified with respect to means of planting. Species with multiple planting purposes were considered in each of them. Planting purpose Ornamental Food Medical Fodder Landscaping Bees Oil Wood Dye Textile Agriculture (other than food) Species number 511 149 99 74 44 37 13 13 8 6 5 % 53.3 15.5 10.3 7.7 4.6 3.9 1.4 1.4 0.8 0.6 0.5

Sisymbrion officinalis 105-96 Aegopodion podagrariae 74-16 Arrhenatherion 56-16 Arction lappae 43-36 Dauco-Melilotion 42-41 Balloto-Sambucion 33-18 Veronico-Euphorbion 28-47 Matricario-Polygonion arenastri 20-20 Potentillion anserinae 19-12 Convolvulo-Agropyrion 16-24 Panico-Setarion 15-28 Caucalidion lappulae 11-79 Onopordion acanthii 8-34 neophytes Aphanion 8-42 Sherardion 7-47 archaeophytes

% of the total number of species

Fig. 9. Occurrence of alien species in phytosociological units. Only the 10 alliances with the highest representation of neophytes and archaeophytes, respectively, are shown. Number of taxa of alien origin that commonly occur in a given phytosociological unit follow its name; the former value is the number of neophytes, the latter that of archaeophytes. Length of the bar represents the proportional contribution of the alliance to the total number of alien species in a given residence-time group. Rare and exceptional presence of species in alliances was not considered. Archaeophytes and neophytes significantly differ in their occurrence in phytosociological alliances (G-test on contingency tables, G = 962.10, df = 177, P < 0.001). See Appendix 1 for classification of particular species according to their occurence in the alliances.

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

117

Majority of aliens (62.8%) are confined to human-made habitats, 11.0% were recorded exclusively in natural and/or seminatural habitats, and 26.2% occur in both types of habitat (Table 5). Plants which were introduced deliberately more often invade seminatural and natural habitats than taxa arriving by accidental means: 63.3% of aliens recorded in either natural or seminatural types of habitats are or used to be planted in the past whereas the corresponding figure for human-made habitas is only 40.7% (Fig. 8). Archaeophytes and neophytes occur in 66 and 83 alliances, respectively, of the phytosociological system; alien species as a whole are present in 91 alliances (classified according to Chytr et al. 2001). Some vegetation types, such as Sisymbrion officinalis, Dauco-Melilotion, and Arction lappae harbour species of both groups with a comparable frequency (Fig. 9). Aegopodion, Arrhenatherion (including its ruderalized stands), and Balloto-Sambucion are alliances with more neophytes than archaeophytes present while Caucalidion lappulae, Onopordion acanthii, Aphanion, and Sherardion are units containing high number of archaeophytes. Alien species are thus concentrated in vegetation of deforested mesic habitats with frequent disturbances such as rubish tips, waste land, arable land, or fringe communities. Hybridization is an important event contributing to the diversity in alien floras (Vila ` et al. 2000). In the Czech flora, hybrids contribute 13.3% to the total number of aliens, and the hybridization is more frequent in archaeophytes (18.7%) than in neophytes (11.7%). Sixty six crosses of aliens with native taxa were recorded (Table 7). If hybrids are excluded from the total number of aliens, there are 270 archaeophytes and 924 neophytes in the Czech flora. The extent of hybridization is difficult to compare with other regions since, as pointed out by Vila ` et al. (2000), the number of hybrids reported reflects the level of detail aimed at by particular floras. British flora has been reported to include 70 hybrids between an introduced and native species and 21 hybrids between two introduced species. In Ontario, there are 31 hybrids directly introduced or resulting from hybridization among introduced species. However, the quantitative data are rather scarce. Whereas hybridization between native species may produce novel genotypes and increase genetic diversity at both the population and species level, spontaneous hybridization involving alien species may have the reverse effects and threaten the genetic integrity and persistence of native species (Vila ` et al. 2000). Range expansion of hybrids can be rapid and hybrids can become weeds (Abbott 1992). Reynoutria bohemica can serve as an example from the territory of the Czech Republic (Bmov et al. 2001). Majority of aliens are diploids and tetraploids. In neophytes, there are more species with high ploidy levels compared to archaeophytes. Native flora has, compared to aliens, lower proportion of diploids and higher representation of tetraploids, triploids and pentaploids (Table 8). Only 310 species (22.4% of the total number of all alien taxa) are common or locally abundant; others are rare, based on a single locality or no longer present (Fig. 10). The proportion of neophytes represented by a single locality (14.3%) indicates the importance of chance in records of alien flora. There are species which qualified for the list on the basis of the successful establishment of a single plant on a single locality. For example, Rumex brownii and R. dentatus subsp. halacsyi were present in their localities as single, fruitful specimens which ended up in a herbarium. What would happen if these plant got a chance to spread their seed and became a potential founder of a population? Other species, e.g. Datura ferox, Polypogon fugax or Alhagi pseudalhagi were also included on the basis of

118

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

Table 7. Overview of hybridization in the Czech alien flora. Numbers of hybrid taxa, classified according to the immigration time or native status of their parents and hypothesized to occur at the territory studied are shown. Hybrid arrivals are crosses and hybridogenous species which originated outside the territory of the Czech Republic. Number of hybrid taxa with archaeophytes Archaeophytes Neophytes Aliens total 12 6 neophytes native 31 35 Species originated in cultivation 12 32 44 Hybrid arrivals Total number of hybrids 62 122 184 % of total number of taxa 18.7 11.7 13.3

28

7 21 28

a find of a single plant. These numbers demonstrate that quantifying biological invasions is a difficult task, and hunting for the number of casuals is probably the hardest part of it! Also, these examples show that the role of humans is crucial in every step of the process and sometimes difficult to predict (Kowarik 2002). Comparison of the distribution of the number of localities between archaeophytes and neophytes reveals an opposite pattern which reflects historical consequences (Table 9). Most archaeophytes are rather frequent; 72.3% are supposed to have more than 50 localities. Some rare archaeophytes are on the Red List of Czech flora: Ajuga chamaepitys, Arnoseris minima, Bromus arvensis, B. commutatus, B. secalinus, Bupleurum rotundifolium, Galium tricornutum, Linaria arvensis, Kickxia spuria subsp. spuria, K. elatine subsp. elatine, Lolium remotum, L. temulentum, Marrubium peregrinum, M. vulgare, Papaver lecoqii, Polycnemum arvense, P. majus, Sagina apetala, Stellaria pallida, Veronica opaca, V. agrestis, V. triloba (Holub & Prochzka 2000).

Table 8. Overview of ploidy levels in Czech alien flora. Note that the data were not available for all taxa hence the species totals are lower than for other presented characteristics. Data on chromosome numbers of native flora were taken from Kubt et al. (2002) where available (n = 2005). Archaeophytes and neophytes are not significantly different with respect to representation of ploidy levels (G-test on contingency tables, G = 0.71, df = 3, NS, ploidy levels with at least 5 taxa were considered). Aliens significantly differed from native taxa in distribution of ploidy levels (G=120.15, df 7, P<0.001). Number of taxa Ploidy level 2x 3x 4x 5x 6x 7x 8x > 8x Archaeophytes 183 67 2 23 1 8 1 Neophytes 427 9 164 1 56 1 26 24 Native 896 105 644 49 174 4 82 51 Archaeophytes 64.2 23.5 0.7 8.1 0.4 2.8 0.4 % Neophytes 60.3 1.3 23.2 0.1 7.9 0.1 3.7 3.4 Native 44.7 5.2 32.1 2.4 8.7 0.2 4.1 2.5

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

5% 14% 9%

119

common
14%

locally abundant scattered rare single locality single, extinct extinct

6%

3%

49%
Fig. 10. Distribution of the types of abundance in alien flora (see text for explanation). Categories including extinct species are disconnected. Table 9. Distribution of alien flora according to their abundance expressed as the number of localities (see text for details). Abundance scale corresponds to that used in Clement & Foster (1994) and Ryves et al. (1996). Archaeophytes and neophytes differed significantly with respect to their distribution of abundance (G-test on contingency tables, G = 477.78, df = 4, P < 0.001). Number of localities 14 514 1549 50499 > 499 Number of taxa Archaeophytes 22 36 34 68 172 Neophytes 571 208 124 72 71 Aliens total 593 244 158 140 243 Archaeophytes 6.6 10.8 10.2 20.5 51.8 % Neophytes 54.6 19.9 11.8 6.9 6.8 Aliens total 43.1 17.7 11.5 10.2 17.6

Potential use of databases of alien species: what are they good for? Databases of alien species have, in addition to the historical value (they can be used for future comparisons), several other functions. (i) The scientific importance lies in the possibility to generate hypotheses about the effect of species characters on probability of naturalization and invasive success (Crawley et al. 1996, Pyek et al. 1995b). (ii) Prediction possibilities. Pyek (2001) has shown that prediction systems screening species on the basis of the number of their characteristics (Daehler & Carino 2000) can be very powerful, definitely more so than those based on mere intution and autecological knowledge. (iii) Regional databases represent stones for a mosaic of databases covering larger geographical areas. A European-scale project of a continental database of alien species could make use of sharing the information on species characteristics, consolidating the measures of naturalization and invasiveness and providing information on potentially arriving species into the country prior to their naturalization. Such better sharing of information might contribute to adopting appropriate measures in advance rather than after the invasion has started. To our knowledge, the database presented here is one of the first of that kind in terms of taxonomical, ecological and geographical detail. For that reason, its detailed structure is presented as a suggestion for the work of similar kind (Appendix 2).

120 Acknowledgments

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

Very special thanks are due to K. Kubt, V. ehoek, V. Grulich, J. Chrtek jun., J. Hadinec, M. tech, J. Zzvorka, and M. Pejchal for providing many unpublished data and sharing their knowledge. Comments of V. ehoek, K. Kubt and D. M. Richardson on various aspects of the manuscripts are greatly appreaciated. V. Jarok kindly conducted statistical analyses. Other colleagues who contributed with information on particular species are listed in alphabetical order: J. Burda, P. Bauer, P. Bure, M. Dank, J. Danihelka, T. Francrkov, H. Gruberov, H. Hrtel, P. Havlek, L. Hrouda, V. Chn, J. Chrtek sen., J. Jedlika, V. Jehlk, Z. Kaplan, J. Kirschner, L. Kirschnerov, P. Kov, F. Krahulec, M. Krl, B. Ksa, M. Lep, K. Martnek, S. Mihulka, E. Opravil, P. Petk, P. Pokorn, K. Prach, F. Prochzka, A. Pyek, Bohumil Slavk, K. Sutor, P. pryar, O. da, J. tpnek, J. tpnkov, B. Trvnek, J. Vicherek, W. L. Wagner, and E. Weber. David M. Richardson and John H. Brock kindly improved our English. Logistic support from I. Ostr, J. Pergl, and I. Koukolkov is highly appreciated. The project was made possible by a grant no. 206/99/1239 from the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic, and partly supported by a grant no. AV0Z6005908 from the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.

Souhrn
Prce je pokusem podat kompletn pehled nepvodnch (lovkem zavleench, adventivnch) druh esk flry, kter se vyskytuj i v minulosti vyskytovaly ve voln prod; nezahrnuje tedy druhy pstovan, je nezplauj. Jsou zahrnuty pouze druhy, kter jsou nepvodn na celm zem R; pokud m druh v urit sti zem, ppadn na ekologicky specializovanm stanoviti, pvodn vskyt, nen povaovn za zavleen, by byl jinak pstovn a zplaoval. Pehled zavleench druh je uveden v Apendixu 1; jsou klasifikovny podle nkolika kritri. Postaven druhu v invaznm procesu odpovd tdn navrenmu v prci Richardsona et al. (2000) a je vyjdeno nsledovn: nhodn vskyt (odpovd anglickmu termnu casual) druh se ve voln prod pravideln nereprodukuje a pokud se v krajin vyskytuje v delm asovm horizontu, je zvisl na opakovanm, lovkem zprostedkovanm psunu dispor; naturalizace druh se ve voln prod rozmnouje, generativn i vegetativn, jeho vskyt nen zvisl na dalch introdukcch a jeho ptomnost na urit lokalit i v uritm zem je dosti trval; invaze druh se v krajin a vytv vce i mn rozshl populace. V Apendixu 1 jsou dle oznaeny druhy, kter povaujeme za postinvazn; invaze u nich probhla v minulosti a v souasn dob se ji ne (vzhledem ke sv nplni je tento termn zaten vt nzorovou subjektivitou, ne termny standardnho lenn). Jsou tak oznaeny druhy, u nich m vskyt vrazn charakter pozstatku z dvjho pstovn na dotyn lokalit; pesto jsou i tyto druhy zaazeny, pokud se na lokalitch udruj po mnoho let a nezdka se vrazn rozrstaj. Dal pouit kritria jsou, zda se jedn o archeofyt i neofyt (tedy druh zavleen ped objevenm Ameriky nebo a pot); npl pojmu neofyt je v zjmu jasnj terminologie ponkud posunuta proti dvjmu chpn (nap. Holub & Jirsek 1967) v tom smyslu, e za neofyty povaujeme vechny druhy zavleen po roce ca. 1500, bez ohledu na to, zda k tomu dolo mysln i nhodn. Zpsob zavleen (mysln nebo nhodn), typ stanovit (pvodn, polopirozen, antropogenn), spoleenstva, ve kterch se druh vyskytuje (na rovni svaz curysko-montpellierskho systmu) a kontinent, ze kterho pochz, jsou dalmi charakteristikami uvedenmi v Appendixu 1. Abundance druhu na zem R byla hodnocena pomoc ptilenn semikvantitativn stupnice zaloen na odhadu potu lokalit (Clement & Foster 1994): 14, 514, 1549, 50499, 500 a vce lokalit. Je uveden tak rok prvnho znmho vskytu z zem R. K 19 druhm, kter jsou udvny z naeho zem jako nov jsou za Apendixem 1 pipojeny komente. Jedn se o Agrostis scabra, Alhagi pseudalhagi, Allium atropurpureum, Bromus hordeaceus subsp. pseudothominii, Carduus tenuiflorus, Centaurea gerstlaueri, Centaurea nigra phrygia, Cerastium maureri, Gilia capitata, Helianthus strumosus, Hieracium pannosum, Hordeum leporinum, Oenothera coronifera, Papaver atlanticum subsp. mesatlanticum, Parietaria pennsylvanica, Polypogon fugax, Rodgersia aesculifolia, Sedum pallidum var. bithynicum a Sedum stoloniferum. Pro dalch 44 taxon jsou uvedeny prvn daje o zplann. Adventivn flra R obsahuje celkem 1378 taxon patcch do 542 rod a 99 eled; z toho je 184 kenc nebo hybridogennch taxon. Podl zavleench taxon na fle R in 33,4 %. Pokud z hodnocen vyjmeme kence adventivnch i pvodnch druh, in tento podl 34,6 %. Flora obsahuje 332 archeofyt a 1046 neofyt; 892 taxon je povaovno za nhodn se vyskytujc, 397 za naturalizovan a 90 za invazn (tab. 1). Z celkovho potu 1046 neofyt dolo k naturalizaci u 229 druh (21,9%) a z nich je 69 invaznch (tj. 6,6 % z celkovho potu introdukc). Naopak 231 nhodn se vyskytnuvch neofyt z flry vymizelo. Vtina archeofyt pochz ze Stedozem; neofyty maj svj pvod pevn v ostatnch stech Evropy (39,8 %) a Asie (27,6 %) a v Severn Americe (15,1 %). Z eled jsou nejzastoupenj Compositae, Gramineae a Brassicaceae (tab. 3). Objevuj se v tomto ohledu i urit rozdly mezi archeofyty a neofyty: Chenopodiaceae, Apiaceae, Scrophulariaceae a Caryophyllaceae maj vce archeofyt, zatmco Fabaceae, Solanaceae, Polygonaceae,

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

121

Onagraceae a Amaranthaceae pedstavuj typick neofytn eledi. Mezi rody s nejvtch potem nepvodnch taxon pat Chenopodium (27), Amaranthus (24), Oenothera (23), Bromus (21) a Vicia (18). Jednolet druhy tvo 57,8 % vech archeofyt, zatmco vytrval bylinn druhy (38,2 %) a deviny (14,1 %) jsou astji zastoupen mezi neofyty (obr. 3). Celkem esk adventivn flora sestv z 44,0 % jednoletch, 9,3 % dvouletch, 34,4 % vytrvalch bylin, 7,7 % ke a 4,5 % strom. 49,9 % vech taxon se na zem R dostalo bez myslnho pispn lovka, 42,7 % bylo zavleeno mysln; na zavleen zbvajcch 7,4 % se podlely oba zpsoby. U neofyt hodnocench samostatn je tento pomr posunut ve prospch zmrnch introdukc (54,5 %). Vtina druh (62,8 %) je vzna na antropogenn stanovit; 26,2 % se vyskytuje jak na lovkem vytvoench, tak na pirozench i polopirozench stanovitch a 11,0 % (151 druh) bylo zaznamenno pouze na (polo) pirozench typech stanovi (tab. 5). Rostliny introdukovan zmrn se objevuj astji v pirozen vegetaci ne druhy zavleen nemysln (obr. 7). Archeofyty se objevuj ve vegetaci patc do 66 svaz curysko-montpellierskho systmu, neofyty v 83 svazech. Sisymbrion officinalis, Dauco-Melilotion a Arction lappae host stejn asto druhy obou skupin; Aegopodion, Arrhenatherion a Balloto-Sambucion jsou svazy typick vskytem neofyt; archeofyty jsou soustedny pedevm ve vegetaci svaz Caucalidion lappulae, Onopordion acanthii, Aphanion a Sherardion (obr. 8). Kenci a hybridogenn taxony tvo 13,3 % celkovho potu nepvodnch taxon; kenci archeofyt (18,7 %) jsou pitom astj ne kenci neofyt (11,7 %). Bylo zaznamenno 66 kenc nepvodnch druh se zstupci domc flry. Vylouenm hybrid dospjeme k celkovmu potu 1194 taxon (270 archeofyt, 924 neofyt). Dvacet dva archeofyt je na ervenm seznamu esk flry (Holub & Prochzka 2000): Ajuga chamaepitys, Arnoseris minima, Bromus arvensis, B. commutatus, B. secalinus, Bupleurum rotundifolium, Galium tricornutum, Linaria arvensis, Kickxia spuria subsp. spuria, K. spuria subsp. elatine, Lolium remotum, L. temulentum, Marrubium peregrinum, M. vulgare, Papaver lecoqii, Polycnemum arvense, P. majus, Sagina apetala, Stellaria pallida, Veronica opaca, V. agrestis a V. triloba. Katalog je nutno chpat jako prvn prci svho druhu pro zem R; daje v n obsaen budou postupn upesovny a autoi budou vdni za jakkoli pipomnky a doplky. Pi sestavovn katalogu jsme vychzeli ze zkladnch flrovch dl vztahujcch se k zem R i z primrn literatury. Obtnost klasifikace se projevuje pi hodnocen mnoha hraninch kategori, zejmna pi rozhodovn, zda je druh pvodn i archeofyt, archeofyt i neofyt, nhodn se vyskytujc i naturalizovan, naturalizovan i invazn. Statut kadho druhu byl dkladn pehodnocen a tebae hojn konzultovn s adou koleg, v konenm dsledku odr pedevm n nzor na historick postaven dotynho druhu v na krajin.

References: selective bibliography of the Czech alien flora11

Abbott R. J. (1992): Plant invasions, interspecific hybridization and the evolution of new plant taxa. Trends Ecol. Evolut. 7: 401405. Andersen U. V. & Calov B. (1996): Long-term effects of sheep grazing on giant hogweed (Heracleum mantegazzianum). Hydrobiologia 340: 277284. Baskin C. C. & Baskin J. M. (1999): Seeds. Ecology, biogeography and evolution of dormancy and germination. Academic Press, San Diego etc. [666 pp.] Beerling D. J., Bailey J. P. & Conolly A. P. (1994): Fallopia japonica (Houtt) Ronse Decraene (Reynoutria japonica Houtt.; Polygonum cuspidatum Seib. et Zucc.). J. Ecol. 82: 959979. Bennett M. D. & Leitch I. J. (2001): Plant DNA C-values database. URL [http: //www.rbgkew.org.uk/cval]. Bmov K., Mandk B. & Pyek P. (2001): Experimental control of Reynoutria congeners: a comparative study of a hybrid and its parents In: Brundu G., Brock J., Camarda I., Child L. & Wade, M. (eds.), Plant invasions: Species ecology and ecosystem management, p. 283290, Backhuys Publishers, Leiden. Blakov D. (1973): Poznmky k rozen Veronica filiformis Smith v eskoslovensku. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 8: 1113. Brickell C. (ed.) (1989): The Royal Horticultural Society gardenerss encyclopaedia of plants and flowers. Dorling Kindersley, London. [608 pp.] Briggs D. & Walters S. M. (1997): Plant variation and evolution. Ed. 3. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. [534 pp.] Brummitt R. K., Pando F., Hollis S. & Brummitt N. A. (2001): World geographical scheme for recording plant distributions. Ed. 2. Hunt Institute, Pittsburgh. The bibliography, although not aspiring to be complete, considers majority of important literature on taxonomy, biogeography and autecology of particular alien species in the Czech Republic; other sources can be found in the Flora of the Czech Republic (Hejn & Slavk 19881992, Slavk 19952000). For that reason, the list of references includes also sources not explicitely referred to in the text. All the sources were, however, used for compiling the database.
11

122

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

Bufkov I. (1998): Lepidium heterophyllum i na umav. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 32 (1997): 152154. Cejp K. (1948a): Dymnivka lut, Corydalis lutea (L.) DC. se v naich mstech. s. Bot. Listy 1: 3031. Cejp K. (1948b): Elsholzie hebenit, Elsholzia cristata Willd. na Tborsku. s. Bot. Listy 1: 3132. Cejp K. (1949): Jet k vskytu elsholzie hebenit v echch. s. Bot. Listy 1:9192. Cejp K. & Hejn S. (1948): Hibiscus trionum L. v prask ulici. s. Bot. Listy 1: 7374. Cejp K. & Peek J. (1948): Nov vskyt kejklky pimov, Mimulus moschatus Dougl., na Rokycansku. s. Bot. Listy 1: 7475. Chn V. (1990): Geum aleppicum Jacq. na Pelhimovsku. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 25: 70. Chrtek J. (1965): Bemerkungen zu einigen Grasarten I. Novit. Bot. 1965: 2125. Chrtek J. (1981): Schkuhria pinnata v eskoslovensku. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 16: 1113. Chrtek J. (1986): Poznmky k eskoslovenskm druhm rodu Cuscuta s.l. III. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 21: 189193. Chrtek J. (1989): Geranium versicolor, nov adventivn druh pro eskoslovensko. as. Nr. Muz. 155 (1986): 71. Chrtek J. & Ksa B. (1970): Euphorbia taurinensis All. nov adventivn druh v SSR. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 5: 8486. Chrtek J., Ksa B. & Slavkov Z. (1986): Poznmky k rozen druhu Scandix pecten-veneris L. v eskoslovensku. Zborn. Nr. Muz.Prr. Vedy 14: 6166. Chrtek J. & Skodopolov B. (1995): Poznmky k rodu Plantago. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 29 (1994): 6770. Chrtek J. & Skodopolov B. (1996): Scrophularia chrysantha v echch. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 31: 7981. Chrtek J. & Skodopolov B. (2001a): Oenothera flava subsp. taraxacoides a new alien plant in the Czech Republic. Preslia 73: 273276. Chrtek J. & Skodopolov B. (2001b): Nkter zajmav rostliny v lomech eskho krasu. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 36: 7376. Chrtek J. jun. (1994): Kl k uren eskch a slovenskch druh rodu Stachys a poznmky k druhu Stachys recta. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 27 (1992): 112. Chrtek J. jun. & kov M. (1990): Rozen druhu Sclerochloa dura v echch a na Morav. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 25: 2941. Chrtkov A. (1983): Poznmky k nkterm adventivnm druhm z eledi Cucurbitaceae v eskoslovensku. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 18: 1525. Chrtkov A., Blakov D. & Blohlvkov R. (1977): Lathyrus aphaca v eskoslovensku. Preslia 49: 337346. Chytr M., Kuera T. & Ko M. (eds.) (2001): Katalog biotop esk republiky. Agentura ochrany prody a krajiny, Praha. [304 pp.] Clek V. (1999): Nad knihou Eric Hobsbawm: Vk extrm. Vesmr 78: 96. Clement E. J. & Foster M. C. (1994): Alien plants of the British Isles. A provisional catalogue of vascular plants (excluding grasses). Botanical Society of the British Isles, London. [590 pp.] Crawley M. J., Harvey P. H. & Purvis A. (1996): Comparative ecology of the native and alien floras of the British Isles. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 351: 12511259. Cronk Q. C. B. & Fuller J. L. (1995): Plant invaders: The threat to natural ecosystems. Chapman & Hall, London. [241 pp.] Cullen J. et al. (19952000): The European garden flora. Vol. 4 (1995), 5 (1997), 6 (2000). Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. p J. (1978): Saponaria ocymoides L. zplanl v Brn. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 13: 63. p J. (1982): Thymus drucei pstovan a vzcn zplaujc matedouka v SSR. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 17: 3738. elakovsk L. (18671881): Prodromus der Flora von Bhmen, enthaltend der wilwachsenden und allgemein kultivierten Gefsspflanzen der Knigreiches I. Gefsskryptogamen, Gymnospermen und Monocotylen, p. 1112 (1867); II. Apetale und Sympetale Dicotylen, 113388 (18711872); III. Eleutheropetale Dicotylen, p. 389691 (1874); IV. Die Nachtrge bis 1880 nebst Schlusswort, Verzeichnissen und Register, p. 693955 (1881). Commisions-Verlag von Fr. ivn, Praha. elakovsk L. (18681883): Prodromus kvteny esk. IIV. In: Arch. Prod. Vzk. ech, Praha, sect. 3a, fasc. 14: 1944. elakovsk L. (1882): Resultate der botanischen Durchforschung Bhmens im Jahre 1881. S.-B. Knigl. Bhm. Ges. Wiss., Prag, cl. 2, 1881: 360395. elakovsk L. (1884): Resultate der botanischen Durchforschung Bhmens im Jahre 1882. S.-B. Knigl. Bhm. Ges. Wiss., Prag, cl. 2, 1883: 3483. elakovsk L. (1885): Resultate der botanischen Durchforschung Bhmens im Jahre 1883. S.-B. Knigl. Bhm. Ges. Wiss., Prag, cl. 2, 1884: 5490. elakovsk L. (1886): Resultate der botanischen Durchforschung Bhmens im Jahre 1884. S.-B. Knigl. Bhm. Ges. Wiss., Prag, cl. 2, 1885: 348.

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

123

elakovsk L. (1887): Resultate der botanischen Durchforschung Bhmens im Jahre 1885. S.-B. Knigl. Bhm. Ges. Wiss., Prag, cl. 2, 1886: 2892. elakovsk L. (1888a): Resultate der botanischen Durchforschung Bhmens im Jahre 1886. S.-B. Knigl. Bhm. Ges. Wiss., Prag, cl. 2, 1887: 174239. elakovsk L. (1888b): Resultate der botanischen Durchforschung Bhmens im Jahre 1887. S.-B. Knigl. Bhm. Ges. Wiss., Prag, cl. 2, 1887: 619673. elakovsk L. (1889): Resultate der botanischen Durchforschung Bhmens im Jahre 1888. S.-B. Knigl. Bhm. Ges. Wiss., Prag, cl. 2, 1888: 462554. elakovsk L. (1890): Resultate der botanischen Durchforschung Bhmens im Jahre 1889. S.-B. Knigl. Bhm. Ges. Wiss., Prag, cl. 2, 1889: 428502. elakovsk L. (1891): Resultate der botanischen Durchforschung Bhmens im Jahre 1890. S.-B. Knigl. Bhm. Ges. Wiss., Prag, cl. 2, 1891: 349. elakovsk L. (1894): Resultate der botanischen Durchforschung Bhmens in den Jahren 1891 und 1892. S.-B. Knigl. Bhm. Ges. Wiss., mat.-nat. cl., Prag, 1893/10: 138. ernoch F. (1955): Euphorbia maculata L. na jin Morav. Preslia 27: 286. ervinka Z. & Sdlo J. (2000): Neofyty Ambrosia psylostachya a Celastrus orbiculatus v mst elkovicch. Muzeum a Souasnost, Roztoky, ser. natur., 14: 6568. eovsk J. (1952): Zajmav ppad zplann zeravu vchodnho Thuja orientalis L. s. Bot. Listy 4: 85. halk ., Malina J., Smrek K. & mitk J. (1991): Nov nlezy Adonis flammea v eskoslovensku. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 26: 6566. Daehler C. C. (1998): The taxonomic distribution of invasive angiosperm plants: ecological insights and comparison to agricultural weeds. Biol. Conserv. 84: 167180. Daehler C. C. (2001): Two ways to be an invader but one is more suitable for ecology. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Amer. 82: 206. Daehler C. C. & Carino D. A. (2000): Predicting invasive plants: prospects for a general screening system based on current regional models. Biol. Invas. 2: 93102. Daehler C. C. & Carino D. A. (2001): Hybridization between native and alien plants and its consequences. In: Lockwood J. & McKinney M. (eds.), Biotic homogenization, p. 81102, Kluwer Acad./Plenum Publ. Dank M. (2002): Glyceria striata a new alien grass species in the flora of the Czech Republic. Preslia 74 (in press). Daumann E. (1967): Zur Bestubung- und Verbreitungskologie dreier Impatiens-Arten. Preslia 39: 4358. Davis M. A. & Thompson K. (2001): Invasion terminology: Should ecologists define their terms differently than others? No, not if we want to be of any help. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Amer. 82: 206. Domin K. (1917): Eine Dekade neuer Adventivpflanzen aus Bhmen. Magy. Bot. Lap. 16: 112115. Domin K. (1918): Dritte Dekade neuer Adventivpflanzen aus Bhmen. sterr. Bot. Zeitschr. 67: 264267. Domin K. (1919): Zweite Dekade neuer Adventivpflanzen aus Bhmen. Allg. Bot. Zeitschr. 23: 3639. Domin K. (1924): Mydlice bazalkovit (Saponaria ocymoides L.) nov a pamtn rostlina kvteny eskoslovensk. Rozpr. s. Akad. Vd. Um., cl. math.-natur., 33/21: 118. Domin K. (1923): Nov druh kuklku pro eskou kvtenu. Vda Pr. 3: 237238. Domin K. (1937a): Portulaca grandiflora Hook. v eskoslovensku. Vda Pr. 18: 117. Domin K. (1937b): Geranium macrorrhizum jako novinka eskoslovensk kvteny. Vda Pr. 18: 116117. Domin K. (1938): Kuklk tuh (Geum aleppicum Jacq.) v eskoslovensku. Vda Pr. 19: 185. Domin K. (1948): O nprstnku ervenm (Digitalis purpurea L.) v eskoslovensku. Hort. Sanit. 1: 520. Dostl J. (19481950): Kvtena SR. Prodovdeck nakladatelstv, Praha. [64+2269 pp.] Dostl J. (1954, 1958): Kl k pln kvten SR. Ed. 1 (1954), 2 (1958). Praha. [1183, 982 pp.] Dostl J. (1989): Nov kvtena SSR. Vol. 1, 2. Academia, Praha. [1548 pp.] Dostl P. (1995): ter slanomiln (Gypsophila scorzonerifolia Ser. in DC.) v praskm parku. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 30: 5354. Dostlek J. (1983): K autogamii nkterch druh rodu Chenopodium. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 18: 131140. Dostlek J. (1995): Spoleenstva s Bunias orientalis L. na zem CHKO Kivokltsko. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 29 (1994): 4146. Duchoslav M. (1994): Cymbalarietum muralis Grs 1966 v Olomouci. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 27 (1992): 4749. Duchoslav M. (1995): Ojedinl nlez Orobanche minor v echch. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 30: 80. Dvok F. (1968): Rod Hesperis v eskoslovensku. Biol. Pr. SAV, Bratislava, 14/3: 154 Dvok F. (1981): Sisymbrium polymorphum na Morav. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 16: 810. Dvok F. (1982): Poznmky k druhu Sisymbrium irio L. v eskoslovensku. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 17: 3942. Dvok J. & Frank M. (1975): Dinebra retroflexa (Vahl) Panz. na Morav. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 10: 1516. Dvok J. & Khn F. (1966): Zavleen rostliny na pozemcch pdelny vlny Mosilana n.p. v Brn. Preslia 38: 327332.

124

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

Eitel F. (1982): Pozoruhodn nlez Ficus carica L. v Praze 8. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 17: 160. Ellenberg H. (1988): Vegetation ecology of Central Europe. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. [731 pp.] Ellenberg H., Weber H. E., Dll R., Wirth V., Werner W. & Paulissen D. (1991): Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scripta Geobot. 18: 1248. Filippov P. (1999): echina uzlat (Myrrhoides nodosa) nov druh z eledi Apiaceae pro eskou republiku. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 34: 5761. Fitter A. H. & Peat H. J. (1994): The ecological flora database. J. Ecol. 82: 415425. Francrkov T. (2001): Contribution to the invasive ecology of Rudbeckia laciniata. In: Brundu G., Brock J., Camarda I., Child L. & Wade M. (eds.), Plant invasions: Species ecology and ecosystem management, p. 8998, Backhuys Publ., Leiden. Frank D. & Klotz S. (1990): Biologisch-kologische Daten zur Flora der DDR. Wiss Beitr. Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg. Grime J. P. (1979): Plant strategies and vegetation processes. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester. Gruberov H., Bendov K. & Prach K. (2001): Seed ecology of alien Bidens frondosa in comparison with native species of the genus. In: Brundu G., Brock J., Camarda I., Child L. & Wade M. (eds.), Plant invasions: Species ecology and ecosystem management, p. 99104, Backhuys Publ., Leiden. Grll F. (1952): Carex muskingumensis Schw. na novm stanoviti. s. Bot. Listy 5: 3940. Grll F. (1972): Artemisia tournefortiana Reichenb., nov zavleen druh v SSR. Preslia 44: 274276. Grll F. (1994): Spoleenstvo s Rumex patientia v oblasti elezninho uzlu v Brn. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 27 (1992): 3640. Grll F. (1996): Ojedinl vskyt karantnnho synantropnho druhu Acroptylon [sic!] repens na eleznin stanici Brno-Malomice. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 31: 7576. Grll F. (1997): Vskyt rostlinnho spoleenstva s Panicum capillare podl eleznin trat mezi Brnem hl. n. a zastvkou Horn Herpice. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 32: 9799. Grll F. (1999): Bohat vskyt synantropnho druhu Amaranthus deflexus v Brn. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 34: 4547. Grll F. (2001): Vskyt synantropnho epekofytu Asclepias syriaca na eleznin trati v Brn-Malomicch. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 35 (2000): 243-245. Grll F. & Priszter S. (1969): Amaranthus patulus Bertoloni eine neue Art der tschechoslowakischen Flora. Preslia 41: 245247. Grll F. & Smejkal M. (1966): Gypsophilla scorzonerifolia Ser. jako adventivn rostlina v eskoslovensku. Preslia 38: 202204. Gutte P. & Pyek A. (1972): Artemisia verlotorum Lamotte eine fr die Tschechoslowakei neue Art. Preslia 44: 4749. Hachler E. M. (1975): Optovn vskyt zavleenho lilku ostnatho. iva 23: 211. Hada E. & Chrtek J. (1968): Valerianella mixta (L.) Dufr. v eskoslovensku. Preslia 40: 301303. Hadinec J. (2002): Bupleurum croceum Fenzl. In: Hadinec J., Lustyk P. & Prochzka F. (eds.), Additamenta ad floram Reipublicae Bohemicae. I., Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 37 (in press). Hejn S. (1948): Zdomcnn dvouzubce listnatho (Bidens frondosus L.) v SR. s. Bot. Listy 1: 5663. Hejn S. (1949): Nov adventivn rostlina v SR Rumex triangulivalvis (Danser) Rech. f., ovk trojbok. s. Bot. Listy 2: 1722. Hejn S. (19501951): Echinochloa macrocarpa Vazing., nov adventivn rostlina v SR. s. Bot. Listy 3: 104109. Hejn S. (1964): Artemisia sieversiana Willd., eine neue eingeschleppte Art in der Tschechoslowakei. Preslia 36: 392402. Hejn S. (1971): Souasn stav rozen Allium paradoxum (M. Bieb.) G. Don v Praze a okol. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 6: 111118. Hejn S., Husk . & Osbornov J. (1984): Ekobiologie neofytnho esneku Allium paradoxum. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 19/Mater. 4: 7176. Hejn S., Jehlk V., Kopeck K., Krop Z. & Lhotsk M. (1973): Karantnn plevele eskoslovenska. Studie s. Akad. Vd., ser. math.-natur., 1973/8: 1156. Hejn S. & Lhotsk M. (1964): Zu der Art der Ausbreitung von Bidens frondosa L. in die Teichgebiete der Tschechoslowakei. Preslia 36: 416421. Hejn S. & Slavk B. (eds.) (19881992): Kvtena esk republiky. Vol. 1 (1988), 2 (1990), 3 (1992). Academia, Praha. [557, 540, 542 pp.] Hendrych R. (1968): Zur Art Trifolium pannonicum in der Tschechoslowakei. Preslia 40: 147162. Hendrych R. (1978): Pvodn nebo nepvodn rostliny na kvteny? iva 26: 25, 5052. Hendrych R. (1984): Zum Charakter des Vorkommens von Matteucia struthiopteris. Preslia 56: 107116,.

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

125

Hendrych R. (1986): Polozapomenut a nov nlezy kvteny SR. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 21: 4555. Hendrych R. (1987): Einige Bemerkungen zu den Echinops-Arten in der Tschechoslowakei. Preslia 59: 135154. Hendrych R. (1989): Physalis alkekengi, in Europa und in der Tschechoslowakei besonders. Acta Univ. Carol.Biol. 33: 142. Hendrych R. (2001): Kvtena Krkono zvlt ped tymi staletmi. Preslia 73: 2957. Hlavek R., Mandk B. & Pyek P. (1996): Nkolik poznmek k nlezu Reynoutria japonica var. compacta v esk republice. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 31: 167171. Hobsbawm E. (1991): Age of extremes. The short twentieth century 19141991. Abacus Publ., London. [12+627 pp.] Holub J. (1966): Nov neofyt eskoslovensk kvteny Epilobium adenocaulon Hausskn. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 1: 3738. Holub J. (1970): Brunnera macrophylla nov zplanl taxon v eskoslovensk kvten. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 5: 510. Holub J. (1971): Opletnk slin, nov zdomcujc ovjiv rostlina. iva 57: 165166. Holub J. (1972) Rozchodnk bledolut Sedum ochroleucum Chaix ap. Vill. 1786 nov antropofyt eskoslovensk kvteny. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 7: 7982. Holub J. (1974): Lappula patula (Lehm.) Menyh., nov adventivn druh eskoslovensk kvteny. Preslia 46: 333342. Holub J. (1975): Claytonia alsinoides nov zplanl rostlina eskoslovensk kvteny a poznmky k jejmu rodovmu zaazen. Preslia 47: 317330. Holub J. (1978a): Epilobium komarovianum Lveille v eskoslovensku. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 13: 7785. Holub J. (1978b): Sanguisorba muricata Gremli. In: Kubt K. (ed.), Floristick materily ke kvten Kadaska. Severoes. Pr. 89: 137141. Holub J. (1978c): Valerianella mixta (L.) Dufr. In: Kubt K. (ed.), Floristick materily ke kvten Kadaska, Severoes Pr. 89: 146148. Holub J. (1991): Nepeta grandiflora nalezena zdomcnl v Praze. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 26: 1931. Holub J. (1993): Leonurus intermedius, species nova with additional notes on some other Leonurus taxa. Preslia 65: 97115. Holub J. (1996): Poznmky k nlezu Pentaglottis sempervirens v esk republice. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 31: 101115. Holub J. & Holubikov B. (1980): Oxalis debilis, nov adventivn druh eskoslovensk kvteny. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 15: 115. Holub J. & Jirsek V. (1967): Zur Vereinheitlichung der Terminologie in der Phytogeographie. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 2: 69113. Holub J. & Palek L. (1981): Rubus xanthocarpus from China, a new naturalized species in Czechoslovak flora. Preslia 53: 932. Holub J. & Prochzka F. (2000): Red List of vascular plants of the Czech Republic 2000. Preslia 72: 187230. Hora-Hoej P. (1997): Toulky eskou minulost 6. Baronet & Via facti, Praha. Houfek J. (1948): Centaurea diffusa Lam. v echch. s. Bot. Listy 1: 7. Hroudov Z., Zkravsk P. & Jarolmov V. (1999): Bolboschoenus glaucus nov druh pro eskou republiku. Preslia 71: 2732. Husk . (1992): Nlez druhu Elodea nuttallii. Muzeum a Souasnost, ser. natur., 6: 179182. Jedlika J. (1949): Carex muskingumensis Schwein., nov adventivn ostice pro SR. s. Bot. Listy 2: 1112. Jehlk V. (1961): Rozen Veronica filiformis Smith v eskoslovensku a poznmky k jejmu vskytu. Preslia 33: 315321. Jehlk V. (1971a): Pedbn poznmky k vskytu druhu Setaria faberi Herrmann v eskoslovensku. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 6: 109110. Jehlk V. (1971b): Sisymbrium wolgense M. Bieb. nov adventivn rostlina v eskoslovensku. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 6: 173176. Jehlk V. (1978): ber die fortschreitende Naturalisation der Art Setaria faberi Herrmann in der Tschechoslowakei. Acta Bot. Slov. Acad. Sci. Slov., ser. A, 3: 5764. Jehlk V. (1980): Die Verbreitung von Lactuca tatarica in der Tschechoslowakei und Bemerkungen zu ihrem Vorkommen. Preslia 52: 209216. Jehlk V. (1981): Chorology and ecology of Sisymbrium volgense in Czechoslovakia. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 16: 407421. Jehlk V. (1984): Artemisia biennis v eskoslovensku. Preslia 56: 319328. Jehlk V. (1986): The vegetation of railways in Northern Bohemia (eastern part). In: Vegetace SSR, ser. A, 14: 1366, Academia, Praha.

126

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

Jehlk V. (1995): Arten der Gattung Oxalis Sect. Ionoxalis in der Tschechischen Republik und in der Slowakei. 1. Oxalis latifolia. 2. Oxalis debilis Preslia 67: 114, 149160. Jehlk V. (1997): Nov spoleenstvo s Chenopodium pumilio na zem Prahy. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole., Praha 32/Mater. 15: 217220. Jehlk V. (ed.) (1998): Ciz expanzivn plevele esk republiky a Slovensk republiky. Academia, Praha. [506 pp.] Jehlk V. & Dostlek J. (2000): Zavlkn cizokrajnch rostlin dopravnmi prostedky do Evropy. Starek nestejnozub, ciz slonokvt bylina, se roziuje v evropskch pstavech. Labsk Plavec, Dn, 42 (10): 6. Jehlk V. & Hejn S. (1974): Main migration routes of adventitious plants in Czechoslovakia. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 9: 241248. Jehlk V. & Kopeck K. (1967): Rumex confertus Willd. nov adventivn rostlina v echch. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 2: 172175. Jehlk V. & Rostaski K. (1975): Angelica archangelica subsp. litoralis auch in der Tschechoslowakei. Preslia 47: 145157. Jehlk V. & Rostaski K. (1980): Rozen Oenothera biennis L. v eskoslovensku a kl k urovn naich pupalek. as. Nr. Muz., ser. natur., 149: 200210. Jehlk V. & Rostaski K. (1995): Notes on the genus Oenothera subsect. Oenothera (Onagraceae) in the Czech Republic. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 30: 435444. Jehlk V. & Slavk B. (1967): Doplky k rozen Veronica filiformis Smith v eskoslovensku. Preslia 39: 206208. Jehlk V. & Slavk B. (1968): Beitrag zum Erkennen des Verbreitungscharakters der Art Bunias orientalis L. in der Tschechoslowakei. Preslia 40: 274293. Jehlk V. & Svobodov Z. (1988): tavele Oxalis debilis a O. latifolia nov karantnn plevele sklenkovch kultur okrasnch rostlin v eskoslovensku. In: Veverka K. et al. (eds.), Proc. XI. Czechoslov. Plant Protect. Conf. Nitra, Vzk. st. Rostl. Vr., Praha-Ruzyn. Jehlk V. & tpnek J. (1983): Hirschfeldia incana v eskoslovensku. Preslia 55: 315323. Jlek B. (1968): K rozen rozrazilu kavkazskho (Veronica filiformis Sm.) v jinch echch. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 3: 109110. Jlek V. (1961): Cardamine chelidonia L. na umpersku. Preslia 33: 199. Kaplan Z. (2000): Lemna turionifera nov druh pro kvtenu esk republiky. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 34 (1999): 135141. Kaplan Z. & ehoek V. (1998): Galium parisiense a new alien species for the Czech Republic. Preslia 70: 5156. Kartesz J. T. & Meacham C. A. (1999): Synthesis of the North American Flora. Version 1.0. North Carolina Botanical Garden, Chapel Hill. Kaufman S. (19501951): Iva xanthiifolia v Nymburce. s. Bot. Listy 3: 133134. Kilin Z. & Krkavec F. (1962): Druh pspvek k poznn kvteny rudi na Ostravsku. Prod. as. Slez. Muz. 23: 4550 Kirschner J. & tpnek J. (1984): Erysimum argillosum, Viola canadensis a Viola obliqua nov adventivn druhy v esk kvten. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 19: 121127. Klimeov J. & Klime L. (1998): CLOPLA1 (CLOnal PLAnts, version 1) a database of clonal growth in plants of Central Europe. URL [http://www.butbn.cas.cz/klimes]. Klotz G. (1963): Die Echium-Arten der SSR. Wiss. Z. Univ. Halle, ser. math.-natur. 12: 137142. Kolar C. S. & Lodge D. M. (2001): Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol. Evolut. 16: 199204. Kolbek J. & Kurkov J. (1979): Cymbalarietum muralis Grs 1966 v Prhonickm parku. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 14: 2325. Kolbek J., Lecjaksov S. & Hrtel H. (1995): Souasn rozen Heracleum mantegazzianum na Kivokltsku. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 29 (1994): 3339. Kontopsk A. (1963): Nejdleitj vsledky taxonomick revise eskoslovenskch druh rodu Erysimum. Preslia 35: 135145. Kopeck K. (1973): Die Beziehung zwischen Siedlungsgeschichte und Verbreitung von Imperatoria ostruthium im Gebirge Orlick hory (Adlergebirge, Nordostbhmen). Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 8: 241248. Kopeck K. (1978): O rozen a pvodu echice vonn (Myrrhis odorata (L.) Scop.) v Orlickch horch. Acta Mus. Reginaehrad., ser. sci. natur., 15 (1974): 6570. Kornas J. (1990): Plant invasions in Central Europe: historical and ecological aspects. In: di Castri F., Hansen A. J. & Debussche M. (eds.), Biological invasions in Europe and Mediterranean Basin, p. 1936, Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht. Ko l O. (1903): O kleistogamickch kvtech hluchavky objmav (Lamium amplexicaule L.). Vesmr 32: 2122. Kotlaba F. (1952): Sisyrinchium angustifolium Mill. v SR. s. Bot. Listy 4: 8790.

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

127

Kotlaba F. (1996): Znte esnek podivn? Zprav. Ochr. Pr. Okr. Praha-zpad 17: 3740. Kovanda M. (1996): Zvonek kosnkovit, Campanula rhomboidalis L., na Morav po 115 letech. as. Slez. Mus. Opava, ser. A, 45: 4145. Kovanda M. (1999): Campanula iserana (C. rhomboidalis rotundifolia), a new hybrid in Campanula. Thaiszia J. Bot. 9: 1518. Kovanda M. & Husov M. (1976): Campanula rhomboidalis new to Bohemia. Preslia 48: 341345. Kov P. (1998): Povodov nplavy: oteven biologick prostor. iva 47: 203204. Kowarik I. (2002): Human agency in biological invasions: secondary releases foster naturalisation and population expansion of alien plant species. Biol. Invas. 4 (in press). Krahulec F. (1981): Nov nlez Lycopsis orientalis v eskoslovensku. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 15: 8186. Krahulec F. (1999): Two new hybrids of Epilobium ciliatum (Onagraceae). Preslia 71: 241248. Krahulec F. & Jiit L. (1997): Bromopsis pumpelliana subsp. flexuosa nov rostlina kvteny esk republiky. Preslia 69: 359362. Krtk J. (1984): Nov nlez Ammi majus v SR. Vchodoes. Bot. Zprav. 1984/1:9. Kran K. & Kopeck K. (1960): Nov floristick nlezy v okol Novho Msta nad Metuj a Tnit nad Orlic. Preslia 33: 6568. Kreh W. (1957): Zur Begriffsbildung und Namensgebung in der Adventivfloristik. Mitt. Florist.-Soz. Arbeitsgem. N. F. 6/7: 9095 Krist V. (1935): Pspvek k adventivn a ruderln kvten Moravy I. Sborn. Kl. Prod. Brno 17 (1934): 69. Krist V. (1940): Pspvek k adventivn a ruderln kvten Moravy II. Sborn. Kl. Prod. Brno 23: 57. Krop Z. (1997): K vskytm a ekobiologii zrazy men (Orobanche minor) na zem esk a Slovensk republiky. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 32: 7986. Ksa B., Chrtek J. & Slavkov Z. (1968): Poznmky k rozen druhu Smyrnium perfoliatum L. v SSR. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 3: 6568. Kubt K. (1979): Eragrostis tef (Zuccagni) Trotter u Lovosic. Severoes. Pr., Litomice, 10: 7980. Kubt K. (1984): Bemerkungen zu einigen tschechoslowakischen Arten der Gattung Rumex s. str. Preslia 57: 205217. Kubt K. (1993): Teucrium scorodonia (Lamiaceae) in Bhmen und Mhren. Acta Univ. Purkynianae 3: 4147. Kubt K., Hrouda L., Chrtek J. jun., Kaplan Z., Kirschner J., tpnek J. & Zzvorka J. (eds.) (2002): Kl ke kvten esk republiky. Academia, Praha (in press). Kubeov S. (2000): esnek podivn (Allium paradoxum) tak na Morav. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 34 (1999): 177178. Kubnov D. & Krahulec F. (1997): Rozen druhu Rumex longifolius DC. v Krkonoch. Opera Corcont. 34: 7989. Kubnov D. & Krahulec F. (1999): Phenology of Rumex longifolius: a key factor for the success of an invasive species? Preslia 70 (1998): 339348. Kuera J. (1991): einice vlatovinkov (Cardamine chelidonia) v esk republice. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 26: 3942. Kuera J. & Dostlek J. (2000): Spoleenstvo se Sedum hispanicum v Orlickch horch. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 35: 9597. Kuehn I. & Klotz S. (2002): The alien flora of Germany first insights from a new German database. In: Child L. E., Brock J. H., Brundu G., Prach K., Pyek P. & Williamson M. (eds), Proc. Ecology and management of plant invasions, Backhuys Publ., Leiden (in press). Khn F. (1968): Plan epice (Brassica rapa L. subsp. sylvestris (Lam.) Janchen), dosud pehlen plevel. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 3: 108109. Kurka R. (1990): Lindernia dubia nov zavleen druh v eskoslovensku. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 25: 4748. Lang G. (1994): Quartre Vegetationsgeschichte Europas. Methoden und Ergebnisse. G. Fischer, Jena etc. Laus H. (1908): Mhrens Ackerunkruter und Ruderalpfalnzen, Mitteil. d. Komiss. zur naturwiss. Durchforschung Mhrens. Brnn. Le Goff J. (1982): La civilisation de lOccident mdival. Arthaud, Paris. Lhotsk M. (1966): Die lteste Fund der Art Bidens frondosa L. in Europa. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 1: 186189. Lhotsk M. (1968a): Die Gattung Bidens in der Tschechoslowakei. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 3: 6598. Lhotsk M. (1968b): Zur Verbreitungsbiologie der Art Virga strigosa (Willd.) Holub. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 3: 413418. Lhotsk M. (1975): Notes on the ecology of germination in Myrrhis odorata. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 12: 209213. Lhotsk M. & Chrtkov A. (1978): Karpologie a diasporologie eskoslovenskch zstupc eledi Fabaceae. Academia, Praha. [296 pp.] Lhotsk M. & Hejn S. (1979): Chenopodium pumilio in Czechoslovakia: its strategy of dispersal and domestication. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 14: 367375. Lhotsk M., Krippelov T. & Cignov K. (1987): Ako sa rozmnouj a roziruj rastliny. Obzor, Bratislava. [390 pp.]

128

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

Lhotsk M. & Slavk B. (1969): Zur Karpobiologie, Karpologie und Verbreitung der Art Iva xanthiifolia Nutt. in der Tschechoslowakei. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 4: 415434. Lohmeyer W. & Sukopp H. (1992): Agriophytes in der Vegetation Mitteleuropas. Schr. R. Vegetationskd. 25: 1185. Lonsdale M. (1999): Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80: 15221536. Loek V. (1999): Ochransk otzky ve svtle vvoje prody. Ochr. Pr. 54: 712, 3540, 6772, 99104, 131136, 163169, 195200, 227233, 259265, 291297. Mabberley D. J. (1997): The plant book. Ed. 2. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. Mackeov Z. (1999): en a souasn rozen Digitalis purpurea v esk republice. Severoes. Pr. 31: 2749. Mjovsk J., Murn A., Ferkov V., Hindkov M., Schwarzov T., Uhrkov A., Vchov M. & Zborsk J. (1987): Karyotaxonomick prehlad flry Slovenska. Veda, Bratislava. [436 pp.] Mandk B. (1995): Peltaria alliacea (Brassicaceae) nov druh esk republiky. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 30: 9196. Mandk B. & Bmov K. (2001): Nov druh jihoafrickho starku v esk republice Senecio inaequidens. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 36: 2936. Mandk B. & Pyek P. (1997): Druhy rodu Reynoutria na zem esk republiky. In: Pyek P. & Prach K. (eds.), Invazn rostliny v esk fle, Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 32, Mater. 14: 4557. Marek M. & Prochzka F. (2002): Cystopteris bulbifera (L.) Bernh. In: Hadinec J., Lustyk P. & Prochzka F. (eds.), Additamenta ad floram Reipublicae Bohemicae. I., Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 37 (in press). Marhold K., Schmid B. & Krahulec F. (eds.) (1999): Ecology of closely related plant species. Special features in biosystematics and biodiversity 3, Opulus Press, Uppsala. [182 pp.] Marvan P. (1952): Rapistrum rugosum (L.) All. subsp. orientale (L.) Rouy et Fouc. (R. orientale Crantz) v SR. s. Bot. Listy 4: 8384. McNeely J. A., Mooney H. A., Neville L. E., Schei P. J. & Waage J. K. (eds) (2001): Global strategy on invasive alien species. IUCN, Gland. [50 pp.] Michal E. (1949): K zempisnmu rozen mydlice bazalkovit u Velis jako adventivn rostliny. as. Nr. Mus., sect. natur., 117: 188191. Mikol V. (1997): Microrrhinum littorale (Bernh. ex Willd.) Speta, a new species in the flora of Slovakia and Czech Republic. Thaiszia 7: 4150. Mller J. (1988): Smyrnium perfoliatum L. na Morav. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 23: 101104. Novk F. A. (1924): Stachys affinis Bge. plevel v echch. Vda Pr. 5: 244. Novk J. (2001): Gagea bohemica (Zauschn.) J. A. et J. H. Schultes a Polycnemum majus A. Braun staronov druhy eskho stedoho. Severoes. Pr. 32: 98101. Opiz F. M. (1852): Seznam rostlin kvteny esk. Spis. Mus. XLIV, V kommiss u Fr. ivne, Praha. Opiz P. M. (1823): Bheims phnerogamische und cryptogamische Gewchse. C. W. Enders, Prag. [162 pp.] Opravil E. (1963): Xanthium strumarium L. ze stedovku Ostravy. Preslia 35: 327329. Opravil E. (1969): Synantropn rostliny dvou stedovkch objekt ze SZ ech. Preslia 41: 248257. Opravil E. (1980): Z historie synantropn vegetace 16. iva 28: 45, 5355, 8890, 130131, 167168, 206207. Opravil E. (1987): Paleobotanick doklady k rozen nkterch rostlin v eskoslovenskm holocnu. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 22/Mater. 7: 7780. Otruba J. (1946): Lamium hybridum (L. amplexicaule purpureum), hluchavka zvrhl, nov rostlina moravsk. Proda 38: 88. Pavlsek V. (1993): Vskyt druhu Nicandra physalodes (L.) Gaertn. v obci Bez v okrese Plze-jih. Zprav. Zpadoes. Pobo. es. Bot. Spole. 31/2: 57. Peniatekov M. & Ferkov V. (1993): Veronica peregrina neoindigenofyt flry Slovenska. Biolgia 48: 3135. Pnkov I. (1988): Oenothera biennis jako jednolet bylina. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 23: 5758. Peek F. & Kutlek J. (1966): Dal lokalita vyszenho Leontopodium alpinum Cass. v SSR. Preslia 38: 416417. Petk P. (2001): rucha velkokvt (Portulaca grandiflora) zplanl v Praze. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 35 (2000): 161171. Petk P. (2002): Cyperus eragrostis, a new alien species of the Czech flora Preslia 74 (in press). Pilt A. (1953): Listnat stromy a kee naich zahrad a park. Sttn zemdlsk nakladatelstv, Praha. Pohl J. E. (18091814): Tentamen florae bohemiae. E. M. Enders und Compagnie, Prag, 1: 32+303 pp., 1809; 2: 6+234 pp., 1814. Polvka F. (19001904): Nzorn kvtena zem Koruny esk. I. Slovnk terminologick a vcn. Soustavn pehled rostlinstva. Kl. Seznam autor. Rejstky. 476 pp. (1904). II. Rostliny prostoplten (Choripetalae). 682 pp. (1900). III. Rostliny srostloplten (Sympetalae). 620 pp. (1901). IV. Rostliny bezkorunn (Apetalae), jednodlon (Monocotyledones), nahosemenn (Gymnospermae) a tajnosnubn cvnat (Cryptogamae vasculares). 712 pp. (1902). P. Promberger, Olomouc.

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

129

Pospil V. (1952): Badil (Sisyrinchium angustifolium Mill.) na Morav. s. Bot. Listy 5: 3539. Presl J. S. & Presl C. B. (1819): Flora echica. In comissis apud J. G. Calve, Pragae. [224 pp.] Prochzka F. (1998): Poznmky k rozen nkterch adventivnch druh rostlin na umav. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 32 (1997): 160, 181182, 196. Prochzka F. (2001): Kvtena Svatoboru u Suice (Horn Pootav). Erica 9: 5568 Prochzka F. (2002): Oenothera flava subsp. taraxacoides (Woot. et Standl) W. L. Wagner. In: Hadinec J., Lustyk P. & Prochzka F. (eds.), Additamenta ad floram Reipublicae Bohemicae. I., Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 37 (in press). Prochzka F., Faltys V. & Marek M. (1983): Nov lokality nkterch zplanlch a zavleench rostlin ve vchodnch echch. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 18: 109114. Phoda A. (2001): Pozstatky starch vinic v Tuchomicch. Zprav. Ochr. Pr. Okr. Praha-zpad 22: 1415. Pyek A. (1974): Collomia grandiflora, nov neofyt Zpadoeskho kraje. Zprav. Zpadoes. Pobo. s. Bot. Spole. 1974/1:5 Pyek A. (1995): Neofytn druh Physalis philadelphica na skldkch na eskomoravsk vysoin. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 30: 123124. Pyek A. (1997): Lokalita Melica altissima L. v osad Dolnky u Katic. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole., Praha, 32: 7374. Pyek A. & Voboil Z. (2002): Vzcn druh hvzdnice (Aster divaricatus L.) v Tachov a jeho blzkm okol. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 37 (in press). Pyek P. (1989): Archeofyty a neofyty v ruderln fle nkterch sdli v echch. Preslia 61: 209226. Pyek P. (1991): Heracleum mantegazzianum in the Czech Republic: the dynamics of spreading from the historical perspective. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 26: 439454. Pyek P. (1994): Ecological aspects of invasion by Heracleum mantegazzianum in the Czech Republic In: de Waal L. C., Child L. E., Wade P. M. & Brock J. H. (eds), Ecology and management of invasive riverside plants, p. 4554, J. Wiley & Sons, Chichester. Pyek P. (1995a): Approaches to studying spontaneous settlement flora and vegetation in central Europe: a review. In: Sukopp H., Numata M. & Huber A. (eds.), Urban ecology as the basis of urban planning, p. 2339, SPB Academic Publ., Amsterdam. Pyek P. (1995b): On the terminology used in plant invasion studies. In: Pyek P., Prach K., Rejmnek M. & Wade M. (eds.), Plant invasions: general aspects and special problems, p. 7181, SPB Academic Publ., Amsterdam. Pyek P. (1998a): Alien and native species in Central European urban floras: a quantitative comparison. J. Biogeogr. 25: 155163. Pyek P. (1998b): Is there a taxonomic pattern to plant invasions? Oikos 82: 282294. Pyek P. (2001): Past and future of predictions in plant invasions: a field test by time. Diversity & Distributions 7: 145151. Pyek P., Kuera T., Puntieri J. & Mandk B. (1995a): Regeneration in Heracleum mantegazzianum response to removal of vegetative and generative parts. Preslia 67: 161171. Pyek P. & Mandk B. (1998a): Pehled lokalit Acorus calamus v esk republice a poznmky k jeho zdomcnn. Muzeum a Souasnost, ser. natur., 12: 2550. Pyek P. & Mandk B. (1998b): Elodea canadensis: naturalizace v esk republice a seznam lokalit. Muzeum a Souasnost, Roztoky, ser. natur., 12: 5168. Pyek P. & Prach K. (1995a): Historick pehled lokalit Impatiens glandulifera na zem esk republiky a poznmky k dynamice jej invaze. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 29 (1994): 1131. Pyek P. & Prach K. (1995b): Invasion dynamics of Impatiens glandulifera a century of spreading reconstructed. Biol. Conserv. 74:4148. Pyek P. & Prach K. (2002): Research into plant invasions in the Czech Republic: history and focus. Biol. Invas. 4 (in press). Pyek P., Prach K. & milauer P. (1995b): Relating invasion success to plant traits: an analysis of the Czech alien flora. In: Pyek P., Prach K., Rejmnek M. & Wade M. (eds.), Plant invasions: general aspects and special problems, p. 3960, SPB Academic Publ., Amsterdam. Pyek P. & Pyek A. (1994): Souasn vskyt druhu Heracleum mantegazzianum v esk republice a pehled jeho lokalit. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 27 (1992): 1730. Pyek P. & Pyek A. (1995): Invasion by Heracleum mantegazzianum in different habitats in the Czech Republic. J. Veget. Sci. 6: 711718. Pyek P., Sdlo J. & Mandk B. (2002): Saturation of Czech flora with alien species: a historical pattern. In: Child L. E., Brock J. H., Brundu G., Prach K., Pyek P. & Williamson M. (eds), Proc. Ecology and management of plant invasions, Backhuys Publ., Leiden (in press).

130

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

Regal P. J. (1986): Models of genetically engineered organisms and their ecological impact. In: Mooney H. A. & Drake J. A. (eds), Ecology of biological invasions of North America and Hawaii, p. 111132, Ecological Studies 58, Springer Verlag, New York. Rejmnek M. (1996): A theory of seed plant invasiveness: the first sketch. Biol. Conserv. 78: 171181. Rejmnek M. (2000): Invasive plants: approaches and predictions. Austral Ecol. 25: 497506. Rejmnek M. & Richardson D. M. (1996): What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77: 16551661. Rejmnek M., Richardson D. M., Barbour M. G., Crawley M. J., Hrusa G. F., Moyle P. B., Randall J. M., Simberloff D. & Williamson M. (2002): Biological invasions: politics and the discontinuity of ecological terminology. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Amer. 83: 131133. Richardson D. M., Pyek P., Rejmnek M., Barbour M. G., Panetta F. D. & West C. J. (2000): Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diversity & Distributions 6: 93107. Roubal A. (1968): Oenothera rubricaulis Kleb. nov neofyt eskoslovensk kvteny. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 3: 138140. Roubal A. (1970): Pspvek k synantropn kvten Kladenska. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 5: 101106. Roubal A. (1972): Pedbn zprva o vskytu pupalky Oenothera fallax Renner em. Rostaski, novho taxonu eskoslovensk synantropn kvteny. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 7: 7378. Roubal A. (1984): Reseda phyteuma L. v echch. Severoes. Pr. 15: 122. Rydlo J. (2000): Echinocystis lobata se podl Labe. Vlast. Zprav. Polab 34: 190194. Rydlo J. (1992): Vodn makrofyta rybnk a tn na Kivokltsku. Muzeum a Souasnost, ser. natur., 6: 109178. Rydlo J. (2001): Zmny ve vskytu vodnch makrofyt v nkterch eskch a moravskch ekch v posledn tvrtin 20. stolet. Muzeum a Souasnost, ser. natur., 15: 5178. Ryves T. B., Clement E. J. & Foster M. C. (1996): Alien grasses of the British Isles. Botanical Society of the British Isles, London. [181 pp.] ehoek V. (1974): Epilobium nerteroides A. Cunn. v eskoslovensku. Acta Inst. Bot. Acad. Sci. Slov., ser. A, 1: 9599. ehoek V. (1997): Pstovan a zplanl druhy rodu Helianthus v Evrop. Preslia 69: 5970. ehoek V. (2002): Bromus carinatus Hook. et Arn. In: Hadinec J., Lustyk P. & Prochzka F. (eds.), Additamenta ad floram Reipublicae Bohemicae. I., Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 37 (in press). Sdlo J. & Storch D. (2000): Biologie krajiny. Biotopy esk republiky. Vesmr, Praha. [94 pp.] Saul J. (1983): Vicia onobrychioides L. nov druh eskoslovensk kvteny. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 18: 26. Sekera W. F. (1854): Wanderungen durch die Hallen der Natur. Lotos 4: 3841. Schippman U. (1991): Revision der europischen Arten der Gattung Brachypodium Palisot de Beauvois (Poaceae). Boissiera 45: 1250. Schmidt F. W. (17931794): Flora Bomica inchoata Cent. 14. Pragae. Schroeder F. G. (1969): Zur Klassifizierung der Anthropochoren. Vegetatio 16: 225238. Skalick A. (1993): Genistella sagittalis in Czech and Slovak Republics. Novit. Bot. Univ. Carol. 7 (19911992): 5157. Skalick V. (19501951): Kejklka pimov, Mimulus moschatus Dougl., na Kdysku a rozen kejklek v jz. echch. s. Bot. Listy 3: 122123. Skalick V. (1968): Studie o evropskch druzch rodu Lycopus L. Sborn. Nr. Muz., ser. B, 24: 185216. Skalick V. (1972): Lidlo jedl (Phytolacca esculenta van Houtte), nov zplanl druh kvteny SSR a NDR a rozen druh Phytolacca esculenta van Houtte a P. americana L. v SSR. Preslia 44: 364369. Skalick V. (1973): Viola cornuta L., nov adventivn violka v SSR. Preslia 45: 147150. Skalick V., Slavk B. & Smejkal M. (1988): Strun historie floristicko-fytogeografickho vzkumu. In: Hejn S. & Slavk B. (eds.), Kvtena esk socialistick republiky 1, p. 1930, Academia, Praha. Skivnek V. (1949): Vicia lutea L. zavleen na Morav. s. Bot. Listy 2: 1415. Slavk B. (1969): Rozen echice vonn [Myrrhis odorata (L.) Scop.] v povod Jizery. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 4: 2025. Slavk B. (1986): Epilobium dodonaei Vill. in der Tschechoslowakei. Preslia 58: 307308. Slavk B. (1988): Fytogeografick charakteristika. In: Hejn S. & Slavk B. (eds.), Kvtena esk socialistick republiky 1, p. 65102, Academia, Praha. Slavk B. (ed.) (19952000): Kvtena esk republiky. Vol. 4 (1995), 5 (1997), 6 (2000). Academia, Praha. [529+568+770 pp.] Slavk B. (1996a): Rod Impatiens v esk republice. Preslia 67 (1995): 193211. Slavk B. (1996b): Erodium botrys a new species in the flora of the Czech Republic. Preslia 67 (1995): 305309. Slavk B. (1996c): Erodium neuradifolium a new species in the flora of the Czech Republic. Preslia 68: 173176. Slavk B. (1996d): Andlika lkask spn invazn rostlina na Labi. iva 44: 6264. Slavk B. (1997a): Verbreitung von Geranium-Arten (subgen. Geranium) in Tschechien. Preslia 68 (1996): 305321.

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

131

Slavk B. (1997b): Verbreitung von Geranium subgen. Robertium und subgen. Erodioideae in Tschechien. Preslia 69: 311326. Slavk B. (2001): Impatiens parviflora f. albescens v echch. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 36: 6971. Slavk B. & Lhotsk M. (1967): Chorologie und Verbreitungsbiologie von Echinocystis lobata (Michx.) Torr et Gray mit besonderer Bercksichtigung ihres Vorkommens in der Tschechoslowakei. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 2: 255282. Slavkov Z., Chrtek J. & Ksa B. (1972): Poznmky k rozen tninku paprskujcho Bifora radians M. Bieb. v eskoslovensku. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 7: 8388. Smejkal M. (1952): Hlavatka vyven Cephalaria elata (Hornem.) Schrad. nae nov adventivn rostlina. s. Bot. Listy 4 (19511952): 8182. Smejkal M. (1959): Geum macrophyllum urbanum (Geum gajewskii nom. nov.) jako spontnn bastard tak v eskoslovensku. Preslia 31: 813. Smejkal M. (1966): Neue oder wenig bekannte Pflanzen der tschechoslowakischen Flora II. Preslia 38: 249262. Smejkal M. (1968): Pstovan a zplanl rdesna z rod Polygonum, Bilderdykia, Reynoutria a Polygonum. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 3: 16. Smejkal M. (1970): K vskytu Veronica acinifolia L. v SSR. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 5: 8184. Smejkal M. (1973): K vskytu Silene viridiflora L. a kence Silene nutans (subsp. nutans) viridiflora na Morav. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 5: 8184. Smejkal M. (1974): Epilobium novae-civitatis hybr. nova (E. adenocaulon hirsutum), ein neuer Bastard. Preslia 46: 6466. Smejkal M. (1975a): Galeobdolon argentatum sp. nova, ein neuer Vertreter der Kollektivart Galeobdolon luteum (Lamiaceae). Preslia 47: 241248. Smejkal M. (1975b): K vskytu Duchesnea indica (Andrews) Focke v eskoslovensku. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 10: 1718. Smejkal M. (1978): Rod Symphytum v eskoslovensku. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 13: 145161. Smejkal M. (1986): Vrbovka ciz a jej pozoruhodn expanze v eskoslovensku. iva 34: 8485. Smejkal M. (1988): K vskytu a rozen Geum aleppicum Jacq. v eskch zemch. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 23: 110. Smejkal M. (1989a): Crambe abyssinica v eskoslovensku. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 24: 1519. Smejkal M. (1989b): Jet k otzce rozen Geum aleppicum v SR. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 24: 101104. Smejkal M. (1994): Berteroa stricta Boiss. et Heldr. jako adventivn rostlina v eskoslovensku. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 27 (1992): 1315. Smejkal M. (1995): Sieben neue Bastarde in der Gattung Epilobium L. (Onagraceae). Acta Mus. Morav., sci. natur., 79: 8184. Smrek K. & Malina J. (1984): Filipendula kamtschatica (Pall.) Maxim. nov zplanl druh v SSR. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 19: 8186. Sojk J. (1962): Novinky eskoslovensk kvteny. Preslia 34: 403404. Stace C. (1991): New flora of British Isles. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. [1226 pp.] Stace C. (1997): New Flora of the British Isles. Ed. 2. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. [1130 pp.] Stanzel J. (1994): Nov lokalita Epilobium komarovianum na Morav. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 28: 7980. Suda J. (1999): Vskyt Linaria arvensis na Blatensku. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 34: 7375. Suda J. (2001): Znovunalezen druhy na kvteny. Lnice roln. iva 44 (87): 1720. Sukopp H. & Sukopp U. (1995): Reynoutria sachalinensis in Europe and in the Far East: a comparison of the species ecology in its native and adventive distribution range. In: Pyek P., Prach K., Rejmnek M. & Wade M. (eds.), Plant invasions: General aspects and special problems, p. 151159, SPB Academic Publ. Amsterdam. Sutor K. (1976): Vicia bithynica (L.) L. tak v eskoslovensku. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 11: 29. Sutor K. (1982): Rozen Euclidium syriacum (L.) R. Br. a Myagrum perfoliatum L. v eskoslovensku. as. Morav. Mus., sci. natur., 67: 119123. Sutor K. (1993): Minute contributions to the Czechoslovak flora IV. Acta Mus. Morav., sci. nat., 77 (1992): 143146. Sutor K. (2000): ttinec lalonat (Echinocystis lobata) zplanl na zpadn Morav. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 35: 3537. Sutor K. (2001): Onopordum beckianum John, the correct name for the hybrid of Onopordum acanthium and O. illyricum. Preslia 73: 185187. Suza J. (1939): Teucrium scorodonia na Morav a Slovensku. Vda Pr. 19: 209210. Svobodov Z. & ehoek V. (1996): Pspvek k problematice americkch druh rodu Bromus L. ser. Ceratochloa (Beauv.) Griseb. v eskoslovensku. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 31/Mater. 13: 3941. achl J. (1969): Ambrosia trifida L. ambrosie trojklann v eskoslovensku. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 4: 126127. ourkov M. (1976): Rod Bupleurum v eskoslovensku. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 11: 116. ourkov M. (1978): Linikoln plevel Silene cretica subps. annulata. Preslia 50: 9395.

132

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

ourkov M. (1981): Bupleurum rotundifolium jeho dvj a souasn rozen v eskoslovensku. Stud. SAV 1981/20: 9597. tpnek J. (1983): Erucastrum gallicum a E. nasturtiifolium v eskch zemch. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 18: 2742. tpnek J. (1998): Mty (Pulegium a Mentha) v esk republice. I. Pvodn a zplaujc druhy. II. Kenci. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 33: 128, 101144. tpnkov J. (1999): Ojedinl nlez druhu Salvia spinosa v esk republice. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 34: 5155. uk V. (2001): Zajmav rostliny cizho pvodu na Karltjnsku. Zprav. Ochr. Pr. Okr. Praha-zpad 22: 3234. Thellung A. (1905): Einteilung der Ruderal- und Adventivflora in genetische Gruppen. In: Naegeli O. & Thellung A., Die Flora des Kanton Zrich, 1. Teil. Die Ruderal- und Adventivflora des Kanton Zrich, Vjschr. Naturforsch. Ges. Kanton Zrich 50: 232236. Thompson K., Bakker J. P. & Bekker R. M. (1997): The soil seed banks of North West Europe: methodology, density and longevity. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. [288 pp.] Toman J. & Star F. (1966): Lythrum junceum Banks et Soland. in Russ. eine in die Tschechoslowakei neu eingeschleppte Art. Preslia 38: 263266. Toman J., Kolbek J. & Petek V. (1983): K vskytu Digitalis lanata v Dolnm Pojize. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 18: 4348. Trvnek B. (1998): Notes on the taxonomy of Pseudolysimachion sect. Pseudolysimachion (Scrophulariaceae) in Europe. I. P. incanum and P. spicatum. Preslia 70: 193223. Trvnek B. (2001): Rozrazily rodu Pseudolysimachion v esk republice. II. Rozen druh sekce Pseudolysimachion a kenc. Preslia 73: 245272. Tutin T. G., Heywood V. H., Burges N. A., Moore D. M., Valentine D. H., Walters S. M. & Webb D. A. (eds.) (19641980): Flora Europaea. Vols. 15. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Uhrov A. (1928): Jak se dostal trnovnk do Evropy. Proda 21: 89. Unar J. (1978): Zajmavj nlezy antropofyt v Brn a v Ostrav. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 13: 196198. Vanek J. (1973): Je znma lutokvt Ballota nigra L. subsp. nigra? Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 8: 209. Vicherek J. (1966): Lagedium tataricum (L.) Sojk na jin Morav. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 1: 163164. Vicherek J., Antonn V., Danihelka J., Grulich V., Gruna B., Hradlek Z., ehoek V., umberov K., Vampola P. & Vgner A. (2000): Flra a vegetace na soutoku Moravy a Dyje. Masaryk University, Brno. [362 pp.] Vila ` M., Weber E. & DAntonio C. M. (2000): Conservation implications of invasion by plant hybridization. Biol. Invas. 2: 207217. Vojta F. (1970): Vskyt tromnu prorostlho (Smyrnium perfoliatum L.) v blzkm okol Teplic. Zpr. s. Bot. Spole. 5: 192193. Vopravil B. (19501951): Erechtites hieraciifolia Raf. na Sobslavsku. s. Bot. Listy 3: 131132. Vratil J. (1952): Netkavka malokvt. s. Bot. Listy 5: 2829. Walters S. M. et al. (eds.) (19841989): European Garden flora. Vol. 1 (1986), 2 (1984), 3 (1989). Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. Webb D. A. (1985): What are the criteria for presuming native status? Watsonia 15: 231236. Weber E. (1999): Gebietsfremde Arten der Schweizer Flora Ausmass und Bedeutung. Bauhinia 13: 110. Weber E. F. (1997): The alien flora of Europe: a taxonomic and biogeographic overview. J. Veget. Sci. 8: 565572. Wells M. J., Balsinhas A. A., Joffe H., Engelbrecht V. M. & Harding G. (1986): A catalogue of problem plants in southern Africa. Mem. Bot. Surv. S. Afr. 53: 1658. Williamson M. (1996): Biological invasions. Chapman & Hall, London. [244 pp.] Williamson M. (1999): Invasions. Ecography 22: 512. Williamson M. (2001): Can the impacts of invasive species be predicted? In: Groves R. H., Panetta F. D. & Virtue J. G. (eds.), Weed risk assessment, p. 2033, CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria. Williamson M. (2002): Alien plants in the British Isles. In: Pimentel D. (ed.), Biological invasions: Economic and environmental costs of alien plant, animal and microbe spedes, p. 91112, CRC Press, Boca Raton. Zajac A. (1979): Pochodzenie archeofitw wystepujacych w Polsce. Rozpr. Habil. Uniw. Jagiell. Krakow 29: 1213. Zlmalk J. (1996): Pentaglottis sempervirens (Boraginaceae) roste i v esk republice. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 31: 7778. la V. & Chn V. (2001): Vskyt druhu Rubus canadensis v jin sti ech. Zpr. es. Bot. Spole. 35 (2000): 193. Received 14 January 2002 Revision received 28 March 2002 Accepted 15 April 2002

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

133

Appendix 1. List of alien taxa of the Czech flora. Species are arranged alphabetically. Family codes (Fam) are formed by initial letters of the family name. The following information is given for each species, if available: Invasive status (Stat): cas = casual, nat = naturalized, inv = invasive. Post-invasive status (see text for explanation) is indicated by an asterisk. Species which are supposed to grow in the wild as relics of former cultivation (in all or majority of their localities) are followed by #. Residence time (Res): ar = archaeophyte; if known, period of the earliest evidence is indicated: N Neolithic/Aeneolithic period (53002200 B. C.), B Bronze Age (2200750 B. C.), I Iron Age (7500 B. C.), R Roman period and Migration period (0550), P prehistoric times (5300 B.C.550), M Medieval period (5501500); neo = neophyte. Date of the first reported occurence in the wild (1st). Habitat type is expressed as combination of two criteria: 1. Land-use: N = natural habitats, i.e. natural forests and naturally treeless habitats; S = seminatural habitats, i.e. managed landscape except of settlements, communications, and arable land; H = human-made habitats (Chytr et al. 2001). 2. Landscape classification: T = traditional agricultural landscape; M modern urban and industrial landscape. For some species, there were not enough data to classify the habitat type. Syntaxa in which the species occurs; alliances of the Zurich-Montpellier school are listed and their codes are explained below (see Chytr et al. 2001 for authors names). Abundance type in the wild at the territory of the country (Abund): s = single locality, r = rare, sc = scattered, la = locally abundant, c = common, e = extinct (if no records have been known for a long period), se = single locality, now extinct. LocNo: quantitative estimate of the number of localities using the scale of Clement & Foster (1994): 1 = 14 localities; 2 = 514; 3 = 1549; 4 = 50499; 5 = over 500 localities. The system used here is based on the number of separate localities from which the species has been recorded, in print, on herbarium labels, or privately communicated during the 20th century; above 15, the number of localities is an estimate. Minimum arbitrary distance between localities in order to be considered as separate was 1 km. Introduction mode (Intr) of the species into the country: d = deliberate (by planting); a = accidental; ad = both means. For hybrids, those spontaneously originated at the territory of the Czech Republic are considered as accidental, whereas hybrids escaped from cultivation are considered deliberate. Origin: E = Europe, AS = Asia, AMN = North America, AMC = Central America, AMS = South America, AF = Africa, AU = Australia; if not given, the taxon is of a hybrid origin or it is obscure. Life history (LH): a = annual, af = annual fern, ap = parasitic or semiparasitic annual, b = biennial, bp = parasitic biennial, pe = perennial, ss = semi-shrub, s = shrub, t = tree, f = fern (in multiple entries, the life form more common at the territory is given first). Species in which the life form is not possible to determine such as hybrids of parents belonging to different life forms are indicated by questionmark. Source: F Flora of the Czech Republic, Vol. 16 (Hejn & Slavk 19881992, Slavk 19952000), K Key to the flora of the Czech Republic (Kubt et al. 2002); as accounts published in the Flora are more detailed, reference to the Key is only given if the Flora does not cover the taxon. Additional source is only given if there is a detailed specialized literature account on the species or if the species is reported neither in F nor in K. Detailed information on taxa which represent either additions to the Czech flora or the first record of escape from cultivation is given at the end of the Appendix together with other remarks on e.g. invasion status, history, or taxonomy. Codes of syntaxa: Ab Arabidopsion thalianae; Ad Adenostylion; Ae Aegopodion podagrariae; AF Alysso-Festucion pallentis; Ah Aphanion; Ai Alnion incanae; Al Arction lappae; An Alnion glutinosae; Ap Alopecurion pratensis; AQ Aceri tatarici-Quercion; Ar Arrhenatherion; AS Alysso alyssoidis-Sedion albi; At Atropion; Bd Berberidion; Bf Batrachion fluitantis; Bi Bidention tripartitae; BR Balloto nigrae Robinion; Br Bromion erecti; BS Balloto-Sambucion; CA Convolvulo-Agropyrion; Cb Chenopodion rubri; CE Carici piluliferae-Epilobion angustifolii; Cl Caucalidion lappulae; Cm Cymballario-Asplenion; CM Cardamino-Montion; Co Corynephorion canescentis; Cr Carpinion; CR Chelidonio-Robinion; Ct Calthion; Cy Cynosurion; DM Dauco-Melilotion; DS Diantho lumnitzeri-Seslerion albicantis; EC Euphorbio-Callunion; Er Eragrostion; Es Eleocharition soloniensis; Fg Fagion; Fv Festucion valesiacae; GA Galio-Alliarion; Ge Genistion; GQ Genisto germanicae-Quercion; Gs Geranion sanguinei; HF Helianthemo cani-Festucion pallentis; HS Hyperico perforati-Scleranthion perennis; IS Impatienti-Stachyion sylvaticae; KP Koelerio-Phleion phleoidis; Le Lemnion minoris; LF Luzulo-Fagion; Ma Magnocaricion elatae; Mn Malvion neglectae; Mp Magnopotamion; MP Matricario-Polygonion arenastri; Na Nardion; NA Nardo-Agrostion tenuis; Nc Nanocyperion flavescentis; NJ Nardo-Juncion squarrosi; Oa Onopordion acanthii; Pa Potentillion anserinae; Pe Petasition officinalis; PF Plantagini-Festucion ovinae; Ph Phalaridion arundinaceae; Pp Parvopotamion; Pr Phragmition; PR Pruno-Rubion radulae; PS Panico-Setarion; Ps Prunion spinosae; PT Polygono-Trisetion; Qp Quercion pubescenti-petraeae; Qt Quercion petraeae; Ra Rumicion alpini; Sa Salicion albae; Sc Stipion calamagrostis; Se Salicion elaeagno-daphnoidis; Sf Senecion fluviatilis; SG Sparganio-Glycerion fluitantis; Sg Saginion procumbentis; Sh Sherardion; Si Sisymbrion officinalis; SJ Scorzonero-Juncion gerardii; Sn Scleranthion annui; SO Spergulo-Oxalidion; Sr Salsolion ruthenicae; SS Sambuco-Salicion capreae; St Salicion triandrae; Sx Salicion incanae; TA Tilio-Acerion; Th Thero-Airion; Tm Trifolion medii; Vc Violion caninae; Ve Veronico-Euphorbion; VT Veronico politae-Taraxacion.

134
Taxon Abutilon theophrasti Med. Acer ginnala Maxim. Acer monspessulanum L. Acer negundo L. Acer saccharinum L. Achillea crithmifolia W. et K. Achillea filipendulina Lamk. Achnatherum calamagrostis (L.) P. B. Aconitum cammarum L. Acorus calamus L. Acroptilon repens (L.) DC. Adonis aestivalis L. Adonis annua L. subsp. annua Adonis flammea Jacq. Aegilops cylindrica Host Aegilops geniculata Roth Aesculus carnea Hayne Aesculus hippocastanum L. Aethusa cynapium L. Ageratum houstonianum Mill. Agropyron pectinatum (M. Bieb.) P. B. Agrostemma githago L. Agrostis gigantea Roth Agrostis scabra Willd. Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle Ajuga chamaepitys (L.) Schreber Ajuga glabra C. Presl Alcea rosea L. Alchemilla conjuncta Bab. Alchemilla mollis (Buser) Rothm. Alchemilla sericata Reichenb. Alchemilla speciosa Buser Alchemilla tytthantha Juz. Alhagi pseudalhagi (M. Bieb.) Desv. Allium atropurpureum W. et K. Allium atroviolaceum Boiss. Allium cepa L. Allium fistulosum L. Allium moly L. Allium paradoxum (M. Bieb.) G. Don Allium porrum L. Allium sativum L. Allium tuberosum Rottl. ex Spreng. Alnus rugosa (Duroi) Sprengel Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. Althaea armeniaca Ten. Althaea hirsuta L. Alyssum murale W. et K. Alyssum rostratum Steven Amaranthus alleizettei Aellen Amaranthus acutilobus Uline et Bray Amaranthus albus L. Amaranthus blitoides S. Watson Amaranthus blitum L. Amaranthus bouchonii Thell. Amaranthus caudatus subsp. saueri Jehlk Amaranthus crispus (Lesp. et Thv.) N. Terracc. Fam Mal Ace Ace Ace Ace Com Com Gra Ran Ara Com Ran Ran Ran Gra Gra Hip Hip Api Com Gra Car Gra Gra Sim Lam Lam Mal Ros Ros Ros Ros Ros Fab Alli Alli Alli Alli Alli Alli Alli Alli Alli Bet Gra Mal Mal Bra Bra Ama Ama Ama Ama Ama Ama Ama Ama Stat cas cas cas inv cas cas cas cas nat* nat cas nat* cas nat* cas cas cas cas nat* cas cas nat* nat cas inv nat* nat nat cas# cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas nat cas nat nat nat nat cas cas nat cas cas cas nat nat nat cas cas cas Res neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo arB neo ar neo neo neo neo arN neo neo arN neo neo neo ar ar neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar neo neo ar neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar neo neo neo

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

1st 1894 2001 2001 1875 1886 1986 1819 1809 1962 1874

Landuse H H H NSH H S H N NSH NS H H H H H H H SH H H H H H H NSH H H H S H H H SH H S S H H H NSH H SH S NS H H H H H H H SH H H H H H

Landscape TM M M TM TM T M T T T M T T T TM TM M TM T TM M T TM T TM T T TM T TM TM TM TM M T T TM TM T T TM TM T T TM M T M M M TM TM TM TM M M TM

1963

1823

2001 1874

1880 1985

1963 1946 1922

1867

1872 1966 1870 1897 1945 1909 1893 1931 1948 1838 1926

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

135
LH a st t t t pe pe pe pe pe pe a a a a a t t a pe pe a pe pe t ab a b pe b pe pe pe ss pe pe ss pe pe pe pe pe pe pe pe pe pe pe s a pe a pe a a a a a a a a a Source F, Hejn et al. 1973, Jehlk 1998 F F F F K K, Sutor 1993 K F K, Pyek & Mandk 1998a K, Hejn et al. 1973, Jehlk 1998 F F F K K F F F K K F K F F F F F F F F F Krahulec in prep. Dostl 1948-1950, Krahulec in prep. K K K K, Hejn 1971, Hejn et al. 1984 K K Dostl 1948-1950, Krahulec in prep. F K, Jehlk 1998 F, Smejkal 1966 F F F F F F, Hejn et al. 1973, Jehlk 1998 F, Hejn et al. 1973, Jehlk 1998 F F F F

Syntaxa Si Er

Abund LocNo Intr r s r la s r se r sc sc r sc r r r r r la c r r r sc s sc r e r s r s s r se s se r r r r r sc se r r e e r e r e sc sc sc e sc r 3 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 4 5 1 5 2 3 1 1 1 4 5 1 1 4 4 1 4 4 1 4 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 2 2 2 2 4 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 4 4 4 1 3 2 ad d d d d a d a d a a a d a a a d d a d a a a a d ad a d d d d d d a d a d d d d d d d d a a a d a a d a a a a d a

Origin AS AS E AMN AMN E AS E AS E AS E AS AF E AF E AS E E E E AS AMC AMS E E AS E AS AMN AS E AF E AS E AS E E AS E AS E AS E AS E AS E AS AS AS E E AS AS AS AMN E AS E AS E AS E E AMN AMN AMN E AF AMN AMS AMS

Ai Sa BS CR

Ae Ph Pe Pr Cl Cl

BS Sh

Sh Cl Ah Pa Si Ph SJ SS Cl Oa DM Cl Oa VE Pa Al

Si VE

VE CA

Si PS Er Mn MP Mn VE Si Si MP

136
Taxon Amaranthus cruentus L. Amaranthus deflexus L. Amaranthus graecizans L. subsp. graecizans Amaranthus graecizans subsp. sylvestris (Vill.) Brenan Amaranthus graecizans subsp. thellungianus (Nevski) Gusev Amaranthus hybridus L. Amaranthus hypochondriacus L. Amaranthus ozanonii Thell. Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson Amaranthus powellii S. Watson Amaranthus quitensis Kunth Amaranthus retroflexus L. Amaranthus rudis Sauer Amaranthus spinosus L. Amaranthus turicensis Thell. Amaranthus viridis L. Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. Ambrosia psilostachya DC. Ambrosia trifida L. Amelanchier lamarckii Schroeder Amelanchier ovalis Med. Ammi majus L. Ammi visnaga (L.) Lam. Amorpha fruticosa L. Anacyclus clavatus (Desf.) Pers. Anagallis arvensis L. Anagallis doerfleri Ronniger Anagallis foemina Miller Anagallis monelli L. Anaphalis margaritacea (L.) Bentham Anchusa azurea Mill. Anchusa officinalis L. Androsace elongata L. Androsace maxima L. Anethum graveolens L. Angelica archangelica L. subsp. archangelica Anoda cristata (L.) Schlecht. Anthemis arvensis L. Anthemis austriaca Jacq. Anthemis cotula L. Anthoxanthum aristatum Boiss. Anthriscus caucalis M. Bieb. Anthriscus cerefolium (L.) Hoffm. subsp. cerefolium Anthriscus cerefolium subsp. trichosperma (Schult.) Arcang. Antirrhinum majus L. Apera spica-venti (L.) P. B. Apium graveolens L. Aquilegia atrata Koch Arabis alpina L. Arabis caucasica Willd. Arabis procurrens W. et K. Arctium ambiguum (elak.) Beck Arctium cimbricum (Krause) Hayek Arctium lappa L. Arctium maassii (M. Schulye) Rouy Arctium minus (Hill.) Bernh. Arctium mixtum (Simk.) Nyman Fam Ama Ama Ama Ama Ama Ama Ama Ama Ama Ama Ama Ama Ama Ama Ama Ama Com Com Com Ros Ros Api Api Fab Com Pri Pri Pri Pri Com Bor Bor Pri Pri Api Api Mal Com Com Com Gra Api Api Api Scr Gra Api Ran Bra Bra Bra Com Com Com Com Com Com Stat cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas inv cas inv cas cas cas cas inv cas cas cas cas cas cas inv cas nat* cas nat* cas cas cas nat* nat* nat* cas inv cas nat* nat* nat* cas nat* cas nat* nat inv cas cas nat nat cas cas cas nat* cas nat cas Res neo neo neo ar neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo arN ar ar neo neo neo arR ar ar ar neo neo ar ar arM neo arP neo ar neo ar ar neo neo neo neo ar ar arB ar arM ar

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

1st 1834 1905 1912 1965 1961 1853 1943 1908 1853 1910 1818 1967 1909 1909 1964 1883 1999 1877 1898 1987 1932

Landuse H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H S SH H H S H H H H H NSH H SH NSH H H NSH H H H H H H SH NSH H H H SH SH SH SH H NS H NS H H

Landscape TM M M TM M M TM M M TM N TM M M M M M M M T TM TM TM TM T T T T TM T TM T T T TM T M T T T T T T T T TM T T T T TM TM T TM T TM TM

1953 1887

1517 1973

1883 1834 1819

1957

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

137
LH Source F F F F F F, Grll & Priszter 1969 F F F F, Hejn et al. 1973, Jehlk 1998 F F F F F F, Hejn et al. 1973, Jehlk 1998 K, Hejn et al. 1973 K, ervinka & Sdlo 2000 K, Hejn et al. 1973, Jehlk 1998 K, elakovsk 1881 F F F F K F F F F K F F F F F F, Jehlk & Rostaski 1975 F K K K K F F F F K F F F F F K K K K K K

Syntaxa Si MP VE PS Si VE Si VE Si VE Si VE PS Er Si Si VE PS Er

Abund LocNo Intr r r e e e r r sc r la e c r r r r la s sc r r r e la e c r sc e r r sc r e sc la r c sc sc r r r la r c r r r r r sc r c sc c sc 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 3 3 5 1 5 2 1 1 2 5 1 3 1 3 2 1 3 1 5 4 5 1 3 2 5 4 2 5 5 2 5 5 5 1 4 4 4 3 5 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 5 5 5 5 d a a a a a d a a a a a a a a a a a a d d ad a d d a a a a d a a a a d d a a a a a a d ad d a d d d d d a a a a a a

Origin AMC AMS AMS E AS AF E E AS AMN AMC AMS AMC AMS

PS Sr DM Si

Cl Sh Si VE SO Cl Cl GQ SS CE Ae Oa CA DM Ab AS Cl Cl Si Sf Pe Ae Ah Sh Cl Sh Cl Mn GA Si GA GA BS BR Cm PS Ah Sn Si Cm Cm Cy AS Al At IS Ae Al At IS Ae Al Al

a pe a a a a a a AMN a AMC AMS a AMS a AMN AMC a AMN a AMC AMS a a AMS a AMN a AMN AMS pe AMN AMC a AMN st E AS s E AS a E AS a AMN s E a E a a E AS a E a AMS AS pe E AS pe E b pe E a E AS AF a E AS a E AS b pe AMN AMC AMS a pe E a E a E a E a E AS AF a E AS a E AS a E a pe E AS a E AS AF b E pe E AF pe E pe E pe pe pe E pe pe E pe pe

138
Taxon Arctium neumannii Rouy Arctium nothum (Ruhmer) Weiss Arctium tomentosum Mill. Arctotheca calendula (L.) Levyns Argemone mexicana L. Armeria maritima (Mill.) Willd. Armoracia rusticana G., M. et Sch. Arnoseris minima (L.) Schweigg. et Koerte Arrhenatherum elatius subsp. bulbosum (Willd.) Schbl. et Mart. Arrhenatherum elatius (L.) J. Presl et C. Presl subsp. elatius Artemisia abrotanum L. Artemisia absinthium L. Artemisia alba Turra Artemisia annua L. Artemisia biennis Willd. Artemisia dracunculus L. Artemisia gnaphalodes Nutt. Artemisia repens Willd. Artemisia scoparia W. et K. Artemisia sieversiana Willd. Artemisia tournefortiana Rchb. Artemisia verlotiorum Lamotte Asclepias syriaca L. Asperugo procumbens L. Asperula arvensis L. Asperula orientalis Boiss. et Hohen. Aster bellidiastrum (L.) Scop. Aster cordifolius L. Aster divaricatus L. Aster dumosus L. A. novi-belgii L. Aster laevis L. Aster lanceolatus Willd. Aster macrophyllus L. Aster novae-angliae L. Aster novi-belgii L. Aster parviflorus Nees Aster salignus Willd. Aster versicolor Willd. Astilbe arendsii Arends Astragalus alopecuroides L. Astragalus glycyphylloides DC. Astrodaucus orientalis (L.) Drude Atriplex heterosperma Bunge Atriplex hortensis L. Atriplex littoralis L. Atriplex northusiana Wein. Atriplex oblongifolia W. et K. Atriplex patula L. Atriplex rosea L. Atriplex sagittata Borkh. Atriplex semilunaris Aellen Atriplex tatarica L. Aubrieta deltoides (L.) DC. Avena barbata Pott et Link Avena fatua L. Avena nuda L. Avena sativa L. group Chinensis Fam Com Com Com Com Pap Plu Bra Com Gra Gra Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Asc Bor Rub Rub Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Sax Fab Fab Api Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Bra Gra Gra Gra Gra Stat cas cas nat* cas cas cas# nat nat cas inv cas nat* cas nat cas cas cas cas nat* cas nat nat nat nat* nat* cas cas cas cas cas cas inv cas cas inv nat inv inv cas cas cas nat cas cas cas cas inv nat* nat* inv cas nat* cas# cas nat* cas cas Res ar ar arB neo neo neo ar ar neo neo ar ar neo neo neo neo neo neo ar neo neo neo neo ar arN neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar arM arP ar arP neo ar neo neo arB neo neo

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

1st

Landuse NS H H H H SH NSH SH SH NSH H NSH N H H H H H SH H SH H H H H H H H H H SH SH H SH SH SH SH SH N S S H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H

Landscape T TM TM M M T TM T TM TM TM T T M M T TM M T M T M M T T T TM TM TM TM TM TM TM TM TM TM TM TM T T T T M TM M TM TM TM TM TM M TM T TM TM T TM

1965 1890

1867

1897

1971 1872

1972 1947 1901

1905 1867

1851

1850 1872 1872 1999 1872 1847 1967 1872 1977

1963

1867

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

139
LH pe pe pe pe a pe pe pe pe pe s pe pe a pe pe pe pe a a pe pe pe a a a pe pe pe pe pe pe pe pe pe pe pe pe pe pe pe b a a a a a a a a a a pe a a a a Source K K K K F F F K K K K K K K, Hejn et al. 1973, Jehlk 1998 K, Jehlk 1980 K K, Grll 1974 K K K, Hejn 1964, Hejn et al. 1973 K, Grll 1972 K, Gutte & Pyek 1972, Jehlk 1998 F F F F K K K, Pyek & Voboil 2002 K K K K K K K K K F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F Dostl 1989 K K K

Syntaxa At IS Ae Al Al CA Ar

Abund LocNo Intr sc sc c r e e c r r c r sc e r r r se r r r sc r r r e e r r r r r c r r sc sc sc r s e e e r r se r la c r c e la r se c r r 4 5 5 1 1 1 5 4 1 5 1 5 1 2 1 2 1 1 3 3 1 3 3 5 3 2 1 1 1 2 3 5 1 2 4 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 2 4 1 1 5 5 4 5 1 5 1 1 5 2 2 a a a a a d d a a a d a d d a d a a a a a d d a a ad d d d d d d d d d d d d d a a a a d a a a a a a a a d a a a a

Origin

Ph Ae Ap Sf Pa Sn Co Ar CA DM Oa Sc Al AF

E AF AMC E E E E E E AS E AS AMN AS AMN E AS E E AMN AS AS AMN E AS AF E AS AF E AS E AMN AMN AMN AMN AMN AMN AMN E

Ono Si Si Al DM CA Si Al GA Oa VE Cl

Ae Al Ar Ae Al Ar Ae Al Ar Ae Al Ar Ae Sf Ae Al Ar Ae Al Ae Al Ae Al Ar Ae Al Ar Ai

Si VE

AS E E E AS E AS E E AS AMN E AS AF E AS E AS E AS AU E AS AF E E AS E E

Si DM Al CA Si Bi Oa Si Si Si MP Oa

Cl Sh Ah Si

140
Taxon Avena sativa L. group Praegravis Avena sativa L. group Sativa Avena sterilis L. Avena strigosa Schreber Axyris amaranthoides L. Azolla caroliniana Willd. Ballota nigra subsp. meridionalis (Bguinot) Bguinot Ballota nigra L. subsp. nigra Balsamita major Desf. Basella rubra L. Bassia sedoides (Pallas) Aschers. Bassia tricuspis F. Mueller Beckmannia eruciformis (L.) Host subsp. eruciformis Beckmannia syzigachne (Steud.) Fernald Bergenia crassifolia (L.) Fritsch Berteroa incana (L.) DC. Berteroa stricta Boiss. et Heldr. Beta trigyna W. et K. Beta vulgaris L. group Cicla Beta vulgaris L. group Vulgaris Bidens connata Willd. Bidens frondosa L. Bidens pilosa L. Bifora radians M. Bieb. Bistorta amplexicaulis (D. Don) Greene Bolboschoenus glaucus (Lam.) S. G. Smith Borago officinalis L. Brachypodium rupestre (Host) R. et Sch. Brassica elongata Ehrh. subsp. elongata Brassica elongata subsp. integrifolia (L.) Koch Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. et Cosson Brassica napus L. subsp. napus Brassica nigra (L.) Koch Brassica oleracea L. Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera (DC.) Metzger Brassica rapa var. sylvestris (Lam.) Briggs Briza maxima L. Briza minor L. Bromus arvensis L. Bromus briziformis Fisch. et Mey. Bromus carinatus Hooker et Arnott Bromus catharticus Vahl Bromus commutatus Schrad. Bromus hordeaceus L. subsp. hordeaceus Bromus hordeaceus subsp. pseudothominii (P. Smith) H. Scholz Bromus japonicus Thunb. Bromus lanceolatus Roth Bromus lepidus Holmberg Bromus madritensis L. Bromus pumpellianus Scribner B. inermis Leysser Bromus rigidus Roth Bromus riparius Rehmann Bromus rubens L. Bromus scoparius L. Bromus secalinus subsp. decipiens Bomble et H. Scholz Bromus secalinus subsp. multiflorus (Sm.) Schbl. et Mart. Fam Gra Gra Gra Gra Chen Azo Lam Lam Com Bas Chen Chen Gra Gra Sax Bra Bra Chen Chen Chen Com Com Com Api Poly Cyp Bor Gra Bra Bra Bra Bra Bra Bra Bra Bra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Stat cas nat cas cas cas cas cas inv cas cas cas cas cas cas cas nat* cas cas cas cas cas inv cas nat* cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas inv cas cas cas cas cas nat cas cas cas nat* nat cas nat cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas Res neo arB neo ar neo neo neo arB neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar neo neo ar arM neo neo neo arM neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar ar ar ar neo neo neo arB neo neo neo ar ar neo ar neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar ar

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

1st

Landuse H H H H H N H SH H H H H S SH H SH H H H H N NSH H H H H H S SH H H H SH H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H N H H H H H

Landscape TM TM M TM M T TM TM T M M M T M TM T M M TH TM T TM M T M TM TM T TM M M TM T TM TM TM TM TM T M M M TM TM M T M TM M T M M M T T

1953 1895 1932

1901 1960 1966

1960 1935

1894 1981 1966 1925 1809 1891 1873 1960 1963

1964

1934 1873

1971

1961 1997

1961

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

141
LH a a a a a af pe pe pe pe a a pe a pe a b pe a b pe pe ba ba a a a a pe pe a pe b pe b pe a a a a b pe a ab a a a a a pe a a a a a a a a pe a pe a a a a Source K K K K F F F F K F F F, Dvok & Khn 1966 K, Vicherek et al. 2000 K F F F F F F K, Lhotsk 1968a K, Hejn 1948, Hejn & Lhotsk 1964, Lhotsk 1966, 1968a, Jehlk et al. 1973, Gruberov et al. 2001 K, Lhotsk 1968a F F K, Hroudov et al. 1999 F K, Schippman 1991 F F F F F F F F, Khn 1968 K K K K K, Svobodov & ehoek 1996, ehoek 2002 K, ehoek 2002 K K K K, Dvok & Khn 1966 K K, Dvok & Khn 1966 K, Krahulec & Jiit 1997 K K K, Dvok & Khn 1966 K, Dvok & Khn 1966 K K

Syntaxa Si Ah Ah Sh Cl Le Al Al BR BS Bd PR

Abund LocNo Intr r c r r se r r c r e e e r r r c e r r r r c r r r s r se r e r sc la r r r r r r r r r r c r sc se r r s r r se r e e 2 5 2 2 1 1 2 5 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 5 1 1 2 4 2 5 1 4 1 1 3 1 2 1 2 5 3 4 4 2 1 2 4 1 1 1 3 5 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 a d a a a d a a d d a a a a d a a d d d a a a a d a d a a a ad d ad a d a d a a ad d a a a a a a a a d a a a a a a

Origin E E E E AS AMN E E AS AF AS AS E AS AU E AS AMS AS AS E AS E E AS

Oa DM Ab PF

Si VE Bi

AMN AMN AMN AMC AMS E AS AF AS E AS E AF E E E AS AS E E E E E E E E AS E AS AMN AMS E E E E E E E E E E E AS E AS E AS

Cl

Oa Si Br Si Si MP Si Sf Pa Si Si

Sh Cl Si

Cl Si Si DM Cl DM

Ct

Sh Ah

142
Taxon Bromus secalinus L. subsp. secalinus Bromus sterilis L. Bromus tectorum L. Brunnera macrophylla (Adams) I. M. Johnston Bryonia alba L. Bryonia dioica Jacq Buddleja davidii Franchet Bunias erucago L. Bunias orientalis L. Bunium bulbocastanum L. Bupleurum croceum Fenzl. Bupleurum rotundifolium L. Cakile baltica (Jord. ex Rouy et Fouc.) Pobed. Cakile euxina Pobed. Calamintha grandiflora (L.) Moench Calamintha menthaefolia Host Calamintha nepeta subsp. glandulosa (Req.) P. W. Ball Calamintha nepeta (L.) Savi subsp. nepeta Calandrinia compressa DC. Calendula arvensis L. Calendula officinalis L. Callistephus chinensis (L.) Nees Calystegia pulchra Brummitt et Heywood Camelina alyssum (Mill.) Thell. subsp. alyssum Camelina alyssum subsp. integerrima (elak.) Smejkal Camelina laxa C. A. Meyer Camelina microcarpa DC. subsp. microcarpa Camelina microcarpa subsp. sylvestris (Wallr.) Hiitonen Camelina rumelica Velen. Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz subsp. sativa Camelina sativa subsp. zingeri (Mirek) Smejkal Campanula alliariifolia Willd. Campanula iserana Kovanda Campanula medium L. Campanula rapunculus L. Campanula rhomboidalis L. Campanula speciosa Hornem. Cannabis intersita Sojk Cannabis ruderalis Janisch. Cannabis sativa L. Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Med. Cardamine chelidonia L. Cardamine hirsuta L. Cardaria draba (L.) Desv. Carduus acanthoides L. Carduus crispus L. Carduus leptocephalus Peterm. Carduus orthocephalus Wallr. Carduus sepincola Hausskn. Carduus stangii Buek Carduus tenuiflorus Curtis Carex muskingumensis Schwein. Carthamus lanatus L. Carthamus tinctorius L. Castanea sativa Mill. Catalpa bignonioides Walter Catananche caerulea L. Fam Gra Gra Gra Bor Cuc Cuc Bud Bra Bra Api Api Api Bra Bra Lam Lam Lam Lam Por Com Com Com Con Bra Bra Bra Bra Bra Bra Bra Bra Cam Cam Cam Cam Cam Cam Can Can Can Bra Bra Bra Bra Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Cyp Com Com Fag Big Com Stat nat* nat* nat* cas inv nat cas cas inv cas cas nat* cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas nat nat nat cas cas nat* cas cas cas cas cas cas cas nat cas# cas inv cas nat* nat nat inv nat* nat* cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas Res arB arN arN neo ar ar neo neo neo neo neo ar neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar ar neo neo ar neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar arN neo ar arM ar arN ar ar ar ar neo neo neo neo neo neo neo

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

1st

Landuse H SH NSH SH SH H H H SH H H H H H H H SH N H H H H SH H H H H SH H H H NS S H S S SH H H H H NSH SH H H NSH H H S H H S H H NS H H

Landscape T TM TM T TM TM M M TM T T T TM M TM M T T M TM TM TM T T T M TM T M T T TM T TM TM T T TM M TM TM T TM TM TM T TM T T T M M TM TM T M M

1965

2000 1856 1879 1943 1929 1960 1945 1989 1948 1996 1853 1901 1872 1872 1857

1958

1963 1852

1974 1968 1880 1960 1868

1930

1967 1947

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

143
LH a a a pe pe pe s b pe b pe pe a a a a pe pe pe pe a a a a pe a a a a a b a a pe pe b b pe pe a a a ab a pe ab pe pe pe pe pe pe pe a pe pe a a t t pe Source K K K F, Holub 1970 F F F F F, Jehlk & Slavk 1968, Hejn et al. 1973, Jehlk 1998 F Hadinec 2002 F, ourkov 1976 F F F F F F F, Sekera 1854 K K K F, Holub 1971 F F F F F F F F F, uk 2001 F, Kovanda 1999 F F F, Kovanda & Husov 1976, Kovanda 1996 F F F, Jehlk 1998 F F F, Kuera 1991 F F K K K K K K Jedlika 1949, Grll 1952 K K F F K

Syntaxa Ah Si BR BS GA Si Co DM Sc GA Al BS CR GA Al Ae BS SS Al CA CA Al Ae Ar

Abund LocNo Intr r c c r c sc r r la e se r e e s se s s r r sc r r e e e sc c r e e r s r r r r e la r c r r c la sc r r r r se se s r r r s 4 5 5 2 5 3 1 1 4 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 3 4 4 3 1 3 5 2 3 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 4 4 5 2 3 5 5 5 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 3 2 1 a a a d d d d ad a ad a a a a d a d d d a d d d a a a a a a d a d a d ad ad d a a d a d a a a a a a a a a a a d d d d

Origin E AS E AS E AS E AS E AS E AS AF AS E AS E AS E E AS E AS E E E E E E AMS E AS AS E AS E AS E AS E AS E AS E AS E AS E AS E E E AS AF E E AS AS E E E AS E AS E E AS

Cl

Si Si Ah Ae Al BS Ah Ah Cl Si DM Cl Si DM Oa Fv Cl Si Cl Si

Oa Si Al Si Al MP Ab AS Si Ab Cr GA IS Ae CE CA Si DM Al Oa DM Oa Al Sf Ae St Ph Oa DM

Cr GQ

E AMN E E AS E AS AMN E

144
Taxon Caucalis platycarpos subsp. muricata (elak.) Holub Caucalis platycarpos L. subsp. platycarpos Celastrus orbiculatus Thunb. Celosia argentea var. cristata (L.) O. Kuntze Celtis occidentalis L. Cenchrus echinatus L. Centaurea calcitrapa L. Centaurea cyanus L. Centaurea dealbata Willd. Centaurea diffusa Lam. Centaurea gerstlaueri Erdner Centaurea macrocephala Willd. Centaurea melitensis L. Centaurea nigra L. Centaurea nigra L. C. phrygia L. Centaurea nigrescens Willd. subsp. nigrescens Centaurea psammogena (Gyer) Holub Centaurea solstitialis L. Centranthus ruber (L.) DC. Cephalaria gigantea (Ledeb.) Bobrov Cephalaria syriaca (L.) R. et Sch. Cerastium biebersteinii DC. Cerastium maureri M. Schulze Cerastium tomentosum L. Cerinthe minor L. Chaenomeles japonica (Thunb.) Spach Chamaecyparis lawsoniana (A. Murray) Parl. Chamaecytisus elongatus (W. et K.) Link Chelidonium majus L. Chenopodium acuminatum Willd. Chenopodium ambrosioides L. Chenopodium berlandieri subsp. zschackei (J. Murr) Zobel Chenopodium bonus-henricus L. Chenopodium botrys L. Chenopodium capitatum (L.) Aschers. Chenopodium ficifolium Sm. Chenopodium foliosum (Moench) Aschers. Chenopodium glaucum L. Chenopodium hircinum Schrad. Chenopodium integrifolium Worosch. Chenopodium melanocarpum (J. Black) J. Black Chenopodium missouriense Aellen Chenopodium murale L. Chenopodium nitrariaceum (F. Mueller) Bentham Chenopodium opulifolium Schrader Chenopodium pedunculare Bertol. Chenopodium polyspermum L. Chenopodium probstii Aellen Chenopodium prostratum Herder Chenopodium pumilio R. Br. Chenopodium quinoa Willd. Chenopodium schraderianum Schult. Chenopodium striatiforme J. Murr Chenopodium strictum Roth Chenopodium urbicum L. Chenopodium vulvaria L. Chloris radiata (L.) Swartz Fam Api Api Cel Ama Ulm Gra Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Val Dip Dip Car Car Car Bor Ros Cup Fab Pap Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Chen Gra Stat nat* nat* cas cas cas cas cas nat* cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas nat cas# cas# cas# nat* cas cas cas nat* nat cas inv cas nat* cas cas cas cas nat* cas nat* inv nat* cas cas nat cas cas nat nat* nat* nat* cas Res ar arM neo neo neo neo neo arB neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar neo neo neo arM neo neo neo arN ar neo arN neo arM neo neo neo neo arN neo ar ar arN neo neo neo neo neo neo neo arN arM neo

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

1st

Landuse H SH H H H H SH H NH SH H H H SH H H SH NSH SH SH H H S SH SH S N S NSH H H H H SH H SH H NSH H H H H H H H SH SH H H H H H H H H H H

Landscape T T M M M M T T TM T M TM TM T M TM T TM TM TM T M TM T T T T T TM M M M T TM TM TM T TM M M M M TM M TM TM TM M M M M M M TM T T M

1902 2001 1872

1872 1966 1823 1823 1880 1951 1948

1986

1953 1835

1809 1834 1957 1840 1963 1963

1890 1966 1864

1961

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

145
LH a a s a t a a a pe a pe pe a pe pe pe ? a pe pe a pe pe pe b a pe s t s pe a ab a pe a a a ab a a a a a a s a a a a a a a a a a a a a Source F F F, ervinka & Sdlo 2000 F K K K K K K K K K K Dostl 1989 K F F, Smejkal 1952 F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F, Dostlek 1983 F F, Dostlek 1983 F F F F, Hejn et al. 1973 F F F F F F F F, Lhotsk & Hejn 1979, Jehlk 1998 F F F F, Dostlek 1983 F F, Dostlek 1983 K, Dvok & Khn 1966

Syntaxa Cl Cl BS Si BS

Abund LocNo Intr r r s r r r r sc r r r r e r r r s r r r se sc sc sc sc s r r c e r r c sc r la r sc r r e r sc e sc c c r e sc e r r sc sc sc se 2 5 1 1 1 1 2 5 3 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 2 4 4 5 1 1 1 5 1 3 1 5 3 2 5 3 5 1 1 1 1 4 1 4 5 5 3 1 4 1 2 3 5 4 5 1 a a d d d a a a d a a d a a a a a a d d a d ad d a d d d ad a d a ad d d a d a a d a a a a a ad a a a a d d a a a a a

Origin E AS E AS AS AMC AS AMN AMN E E E AS E AS E AS E E E E AS E E AS E AS E E E E AS AS AMN E E AS AS AMS AMN E E AS AMN E AS E AS AF E AS AMS AU AMN E AS AU E AS AF E E AS AMN AS AU AMS AF E AS AS E AS E AS AMC AMS

Ap Sh Ae Ar DM Fv

DM Oa Fv Cm Ar Ae

Cm Ar Ar Cm Oa GA

GA Ae SS TA Si Si Si Ae Al Ra Pa Si PS Sr Si MP VE Si Cb Bi Si MP VE Cb SJ Si MP Pa Si Si Si Si Mn Si Si Si Al Cb Si VE SO Bi VE Si Si Mn MP Si PS Bi Si Si Si MP Er PS Si Mn Er PS Si Mn MP Si

146
Taxon Chloris truncata R. Br. Chloris virgata Swartz Chlorocrepis staticifolia (All.) Griseb. Chorispora tenella (Pallas) DC. Cicer arietinum L. Cicerbita macrophylla subsp. uralensis (Rouy) P. D. Sell Cichorium intybus subsp. foliosum (Hegi) Janchen Cichorium intybus L. subsp. intybus Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Cirsium aschersonianum elak. Cirsium bipontinum F. W. Schultz Cirsium celakovskyanum Knaf Cirsium echinus (M. Bieb.) Hand.-Mazz. Cirsium gerhardtii Schultz-Bip. Cirsium preiseri Uechtr. Cirsium reichenbachianum Lhr Cirsium sabaudum Lhr Cirsium sextinum Ausserd. ex Huter Cirsium soroksarense Wagner Cirsium subspinuligerum Peterm. Cirsium tuberosum (L.) All. Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Ten. Citrullus lanatus (Thunberg) Matsumura et Nakai Clarkia pulchella Pursh. Clarkia unguiculata Lindl. Claytonia alsinoides Sims Claytonia perfoliata Willd. Clematis flammula L. Clematis tangutica (Maxim.) Korshinsky Clematis viticella L. Cnicus benedictus L. Cnidium silaifolium (Jacq.) Simk. Cochlearia officinalis L. Coleostephus myconis (L.) Reichenb. fil. Collomia grandiflora Lindl. Colutea arborescens L. Commelina communis L. Conium maculatum L. Conringia orientalis (L.) Dumort. Consolida ajacis (L.) Schur Consolida orientalis (Gay) Schrdinger Consolida regalis S. F. Gray subsp. regalis Convolvulus arvensis L. Convolvulus tricolor L. Conygeron huelsenii (Vatke) Rauschert Conyza bonariensis (L.) Cronq. Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq. Conyza triloba Decne. Coreopsis tinctoria Nutt. Coriandrum sativum L. Corispermum leptopterum (Aschers.) Iljin Cornus sericea L. emend. Murray Coronilla scorpioides (L.) Koch Coronopus didymus (L.) Sm. Coronopus squamatus (Forska l) Aschers. subsp. squamatus Corydalis alba (Mill.) Mansf. subsp. alba Corydalis lutea (L.) DC. Fam Gra Gra Com Bra Fab Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Cuc Ona Ona Por Por Ran Ran Ran Com Api Bra Com Pole Fab Come Api Bra Ran Ran Ran Con Con Com Com Com Com Com Api Chen Cor Fab Bra Bra Fum Fum Stat cas cas cas cas cas cas cas nat inv cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas inv cas cas cas nat cas cas cas cas cas nat cas cas nat nat cas inv nat* cas nat nat* nat* cas cas cas inv cas cas cas cas nat cas cas nat* cas nat Res neo neo neo neo neo neo neo arM arP neo ar ar neo ar ar ar ar ar ar ar neo arM neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo arM arB neo neo ar arN neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar neo neo

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

1st 1956 1961 1873 1960

Landuse H H H H H SH H SH SH SH SH SH H SH SH SH SH SH SH SH S SH H H H H H H H H H H H H SH NS H H H H H H NSH H H H H H H H H NSH H H H H H

Landscape M M T M TM TM TM TM TM T T T T T T T T T T T T TM TM M M TM N TM T TM TM TM T TM T T TM TM T TM TM T TM TM T M TM T TM TM M TM M M T TM TM

1937

1872 1969

1951

1883 1868 1819 1880 1819 1940

1880 1913

1887 1964 1750 1971 1883 1819 1960 1900 1903 1995 1886

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

147
LH a a pe a a pe b pe pe pe pe pe pe pe pe pe pe pe pe pe pe pe a a a a a s s s a pe b pe a a s a ab a a a a pe a pe ? a a a pe a a a s a ab ab pe pe Source K, Dvok & Khn 1966 K, Dvok & Khn 1966 Dostl 1989, tech in prep. F F K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K F F F F, Holub 1975 F F K, Pilt 1953, Prochzka 1998 F K F F Dostl 1989 F F K, Hejn et al. 1973, Jehlk 1998 F F F F, Jehlk 1998 F F F K, elakovsk 1888b K K K K F F F F F F Dostl 1989 F

Syntaxa

Abund LocNo Intr e se se r r r r c c se r r e r r r r r r r se c r r r r r r r r r e r se r r sc sc r sc r sc c r r s c se r r e r e r r r sc 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 5 5 1 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 5 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 3 3 4 5 4 3 4 5 5 2 1 1 5 1 2 2 1 3 1 3 5 1 4 a a a a d d d a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a d d d d d d d d d a d d d d d a a ad ad a a d a a a a d d a d a a a d d

Origin AS AU AMC AMS E E AS E AS AS E E AS

Ae Cy DM Ar Si DM CA VE

AS

DM Si CE Si VE

Qp Bd Si Al Sf Cl Si Ah Sh Cl Sh Si Cl Sh CA DM Oa Cl Sh VE Br

E E AS AF AMN AMN AMN AMN AMC E AS AF AS E AS E E AS E E AMN E AS E AS AF E AS AF E AS AF E AS AF E AS E AS E AS AMS AMN AS AF AMN E E AS AMN E AS AF AMS E E E

Si Sr PS

Ai St MP Si MP Cm Cm

148
Taxon Corylus colurna L. Corylus maxima Mill. Cosmos bipinnatus Cav. Cotinus coggygria Scop. Cotoneaster bullatus Boiss. Cotoneaster horizontalis Decne Cotoneaster lucidus Schlecht. Cotula australis (Sieb. ex Spreng.) Hook fil. Crambe abyssinica Hochst. ex R. E. Fries Crambe maritima L. Crataegus crus-galli L. Crataegus flabellata (Bosc ex Spach) C. Koch Crataegus mollis (Torrey et A. Gray) Crataegus pedicellata Sarg. Crataegus persimilis Sarg. Crepis biennis L. Crepis capillaris (L.) Wallr. Crepis foetida L. subsp. foetida Crepis foetida subsp. rhoeadifolia (M. Bieb.) elak. Crepis nicaeensis Balb. Crepis setosa Haller fil. Crepis tectorum L. Crepis vesicaria subsp. taraxacifolia (Thuill.) Thell. Crocus chrysanthus Herb. Crocus flavus West. Crocus heuffelianus Herb. Crocus napolitanus Mord. Crocus sativus L. Cucumis melo L. Cucumis sativus L. Cucurbita maxima Duchesne Cucurbita pepo L. Cuscuta campestris Yuncker Cuscuta epilinum Boenn. Cydonia oblonga Mill. Cymbalaria muralis G., M. et Sch. subsp. muralis Cymbalaria pallida (Ten.) Wettst. Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. Cynosurus echinatus L. Cyperus eragrostis Lam. Cyperus rotundus L. Cypripedium reginae Walt. Cystopteris bulbifera (L.) Bernh. Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link subsp. scoparius Dactyloctenium aegypticum (L.) P. B. Dahlia pinnata Cav. Dasypyrum villosum (L.) P. Candargy Datura ferox L. Datura inoxia Mill. Datura stramonium L. var. stramonium Datura stramonium var. tatula (L.) Torrey Daucus carota subsp. sativus (Hoffm.) Schbl. et Mart. Descurainia sophia (L.) Webb ex Prantl Desmazeria rigida (L.) Tutin Deutzia scabra Thunb. Dianthus barbatus L. subsp. barbatus Dianthus caryophyllus L. Fam Bet Bet Com Ana Ros Ros Ros Com Bra Bra Ros Ros Ros Ros Ros Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Com Lil Lil Lil Lil Lil Cuc Cuc Cuc Cuc Con Con Ros Scr Scr Gra Gra Cyp Cyp Orch Dry Fab Gra Com Gra Sol Sol Sol Sol Api Bra Gra Phi Car Car Stat cas cas cas cas# cas cas# cas cas cas cas cas# cas cas cas cas nat* nat cas nat cas nat nat* cas cas# cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas inv nat cas nat* cas nat* cas cas cas cas# nat# inv* cas cas cas cas cas nat nat cas nat cas cas cas# cas Res neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar ar neo ar neo arR ar neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo arM ar ar neo ar neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo arI neo neo neo neo

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

1st 2001 1902 1884 2001 1986 1961 1965 1900 1993

Landuse SH H H H H S S H H H N H SH SH S SH SH S SH H SH SH H NSH SH S SH S H H H H H H SH H SH SH H N H S N NSH H H H H H H H H H H H SH H

Landscape T M M T M T T M TM TM T M TM T T TM T T TM TM T T TM TM TM T TM T TM TM TM TM TM T T TM TM TM M T TM T T T M TM M TM TM TM TM TM TM M M TM TM

1872 1872

1960 1999

1963

1969 1883

1999 1935 1819

1987 1934 1809 1935

2001 1874

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

149
LH Source F F K F F F Dvok & Khn 1966 F, Smejkal 1989a F F F F F F K K K K K K K K K, uk 2001 K K K K F F F F F, Jehlk 1998 F F F F K K K, Petk 2002 K Dostl 1948-1950, uk 2001 Marek & Prochzka 2002 F K K K F F F F F F Dostl 1989 F F F

Syntaxa

Abund LocNo Intr s r r r s r s se e r se r r sc s c la e la r r r se r r r r se r r r r sc e r sc r sc r s e e s sc r r r e se sc r r c r s r r 1 2 4 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 5 5 1 5 2 2 4 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 3 4 2 5 2 5 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 3 1 1 1 5 3 3 5 1 1 3 2 d d d d d d d a d d d d d d d a a a a b a a a d d d d d d d d d a a d ad d a a a a d d d a d a a d ad ad d a a d d d

Origin E AS E AS AMC E AS AS AS AU AF E AMN AMN AMN AMN AMN E E E AS E AS E E E AS E E AS E E E

Si Ar

Ar Cy PT DM Sc

Si DM

Si VE Al Ap Cm CA Sr Er

CE Ge GQ Si

Si VE Si VE Si VE Si Cl Oa

t s a st s s s a a pe ts st ts ts st b a a a pe a a pe pe pe pe pe pe AS AF a AS a AMS a AMN AMC AF a AMN a E AS a AS ts E pe E pe AS AF pe E a AMN AMC AMS pe E pe AMN pe AMN pe E s AS AF a AMC pe E AS AF a AS a AMN AMC AMS pe AMN a AMN a AS b E AS a E a AS s E pe E pe

150
Taxon Dianthus chinensis L. Dichanthium sericeum (R. Br.) A. Camus Diervilla lonicera Mill. Digitalis lanata Ehrh. Digitalis lutea L. Digitalis purpurea L. Digitaria ischaemum (Schreber) Mhlenb. Digitaria sanguinalis subsp. pectiniformis Henrard Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. subsp. sanguinalis Dinebra retroflexa (Vahl) Panzer Diplotaxis muralis (L.) DC. Diplotaxis tenuifolia (L.) DC. Dipsacus sativus (L.) Honck. Doronicum columnae Ten. Doronicum orientale Hoffm. Doronicum pardalianches L. Draba sibirica (Pall.) Thell. Dracocephalum moldavica L. Dracocephalum thymiflorum L. Duchesnea indica (Andrew) Focke Ecballium elaterium (L.) A. Richard Echinochloa colonum (L.) Link Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. B. Echinochloa frumentacea Link Echinochloa muricata (P. B.) Fernald Echinochloa oryzoides (Ard.) Fritsch Echinochloa utilis Ohwi et Yabuno Echinocystis lobata (Michx) Torrey et A. Gray Echinops exaltatus Schrad. Echinops sphaerocephalus L. Echium plantagineum L. Echium vulgare L. Ehrharta longiflora Sw. Eichhornia crassipes (C. Martius) Solms-Laub. Elaeagnus angustifolia L. Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. Ellisia nyctelea L. Elodea canadensis Michx. Elodea nuttallii (Planch.) St. John Elsholtzia ciliata Willd. Elymus canadensis L. Epilobium ciliatum Rafin. Epilobium dodonaei Vill. Epilobium floridulum Smejkal Epilobium fossicola Smejkal Epilobium iglaviense Smejkal Epilobium interjectum Smejkal Epilobium josefi-holubi Krahulec Epilobium komarovianum H. Lveille Epilobium mentiens Smejkal Epilobium novae-civitatis Smejkal Epilobium nutantiflorum Smejkal Epilobium prochazkae Krahulec Epilobium vicinum Smejkal Epimedium alpinum L. Eragrostis albensis H. Scholz Eragrostis cilianensis (All.) F. T. Hubbard Fam Car Gra Cap Scr Scr Scr Gra Gra Gra Gra Bra Bra Dip Com Com Com Bra Lam Lam Ros Cuc Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Cuc Com Com Bor Bor Gra Pont Ela Gra Hydp Hydc Hydc Lam Gra Ona Ona Ona Ona Ona Ona Ona Ona Ona Ona Ona Ona Ona Ber Gra Gra Stat cas cas cas# cas cas inv nat* nat* nat* cas nat* nat* cas nat# nat# nat# cas cas cas nat cas cas nat cas cas cas cas inv nat inv cas nat* cas cas cas cas cas inv cas cas cas inv nat cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas Res neo neo neo neo neo neo ar arM arM neo ar ar neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo arN neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo arN neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

1st 1961 1881 1872 1790

Landuse H H SH H SH NS H H H H H SH H S S S H H H H H H NSH H H H H NSH SH SH H NSH H H H H H NSH N H H NSH NSH H SH SH SH SH H SH H SH SH SH H H H

Landscape TM M T T T T TM TM TM M T T T T T T M T TM TM M M TM M M M M T TM TM M TM M T TM M TM TM TM TM M TM TM TM T TM TM T TM TM TM TM T T TM M TM

1972

1901 1819 1897 1963 1854 1958 1960 1880

1950 1911 1871 1960 1963 2000 1963 1879 1988 1853 1926 1794 1980 1979 1987 1997 1964 1987 1972 1976 1997 1971 1874 1984

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

151
LH Source F K, Dvok & Khn 1966 F F F F, Domin 1948, Mackeov 1999 K K K K, Dvok & Khn 1966 F F F K, tech in prep. K, tech in prep. K F F F, Hejn et al. 1973 F, Smejkal 1975b F K K K K K, Hejn 1950-51, Dvok & Khn 1966, Hejn et al. 1973 K F, Slavk & Lhotsk 1967, Sutor 2000, Rydlo 2000 K K, Hendrych 1987 F F, Klotz 1963 Dvok & Khn 1966 Rydlo 2001 F K, Dvok & Khn 1966, Jehlk 1998 F K, Pyek & Mandk 1998b K, Husk 1992 F, Cejp 1948 K F, Holub 1966, Smejkal 1986 F, Slavk 1986 F, Smejkal 1995 F, Smejkal 1995 F, Smejkal 1995 F, Smejkal 1995 K, Krahulec 1999 F, ehoek 1974, Holub 1978a F, Smejkal 1995 F, Smejkal 1974 F, Smejkal 1995 K, Krahulec 1999 F, Smejkal 1995 F K K, Dvok & Khn 1966

Syntaxa

Abund LocNo Intr r se r r r la sc r c r sc sc r r r s r e e r r e c e r e r la r c se c se r r r r c r r e c la r r s r s r r r r r r r s r 1 1 1 2 2 5 5 4 5 1 5 4 3 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 4 3 5 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 3 1 5 3 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 d a d ad ad d a a d a ad a ad d d d d d a d d a a a a a a d d d a a a d d a ad a d d a a a a a a a a ad a a a a a d a a

Origin AS AU AMN E E E E E E AS AF E AF E AS AF E E E AS E AS AS E AS AS E AS AF E E AS AS AMN E AS AMN E E AS E E AS AF AMS E AS AF AMN AMN AMN AS AMN AMN AMC E

CE LF Er PS Si MP PS Er Er PS MP Si VE Mn Si CA DM

Ar Pa

PS Bi Nc Es Si SO

Sf Al Ae Ae DM Al CA DM Ab AS Si AF Fv HF

MP Er Mp Bf Pp Si Ma Ar Pa CE Ae Al Bi Si DM Sx Se

Ae GA

ab pe s b pe pe b pe a a a a ab pe b pe pe pe pe a a pe pe a a a a a a a pe pe b b pe a pe t a a pe pe a pe pe pe pe pe pe pe pe AU pe pe pe pe pe pe E pe a AS AF AMC AMS a

152
Taxon Eragrostis gracilis Schrader Eragrostis mexicana (Lag.) Link Eragrostis minor Host Eragrostis multicaulis Steud. Eragrostis suaveolens Becher. Eragrostis tef (Zuccagni) Trotter Eranthis hyemalis (L.) Salisb. Erechtites hieraciifolia (L.) Rafin. ex DC. Erigeron annuus subsp. septentrionalis (Fern. et Wieg.) Wagenitz Erigeron annuus (L.) Pers. subsp. annuus Erigeron speciosus (Lindl.) DC. Erigeron strigosus Willd. Eriochloa procera (Retz.) C. E. Hubb. Erodium botrys (Cav.) Bertol. Erodium cicutarium (L.) LHr. subsp. cicutarium Erodium gruinum (L.) LHr. Erodium moschatum (L.) LHr. Erodium neuradifolium Delile Eruca sativa (L.) Mill. Erucastrum gallicum (Willd.) O. E. Schulz Erucastrum nasturtiifolium (Poiret) O. E. Schulz Eryngium amethystinum L. Eryngium giganteum M. Bieb. Erysimum argillosum (Greene) Rydberg Erysimum cheiranthoides L. subsp. cheiranthoides Erysimum cheiri (L.) Crantz Erysimum repandum L. Erythronium dens-canis L. Eschscholzia californica Cham. Euclidium syriacum (L.) R. Br. Euphorbia chamaesyce L. Euphorbia exigua L. Euphorbia falcata L. Euphorbia helioscopia L. Euphorbia humifusa Willd. Euphorbia lagascae Sprengel Euphorbia lathyris L. Euphorbia maculata L. Euphorbia marginata Pursh. Euphorbia peplus L. Euphorbia taurinensis All. Fagopyrum esculentum Moench Fagopyrum tataricum (L.) Gaertn. Fallopia aubertii (L. Henry) Holub Fallopia convolvulus (L.) . Lve Ficus carica L. Filago gallica L. Filipendula kamtschatica (Pallas) Maxim. Filipendula rubra (Hill) Robinson Foeniculum vulgare Mill. Forsythia suspensa (Thunb.) Vahl Fragaria magna Thuill. Fraxinus ornus L. Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marshall Fritillaria meleagris L. Fumaria capreolata L. Fumaria officinalis L. subsp. officinalis Fam Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Ran Com Com Com Com Com Gra Ger Ger Ger Ger Ger Bra Bra Bra Api Api Bra Bra Bra Bra Lil Pap Bra Eup Eup Eup Eup Eup Eup Eup Eup Eup Eup Eup Poly Poly Poly Poly Mor Com Ros Ros Api Ole Ros Ole Ole Lil Fum Fum Stat cas cas nat* cas cas cas cas nat inv nat cas nat cas cas nat* cas cas cas cas nat nat cas cas cas nat* cas nat* nat cas nat* cas nat* nat* nat* cas cas cas cas cas nat* cas cas cas nat nat* cas cas cas# cas cas cas cas nat inv cas cas nat* Res neo neo ar neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo arB neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar neo ar neo neo ar neo arI ar arB neo neo neo neo neo arM neo neo neo neo arN neo neo neo neo ar neo neo neo neo neo neo arN

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

1st 1966 1961 1961 1965

Landuse H H H H H H NSH NSH H H H H H H NSH H H H H H SH H H S SH H SH NS H SH H H H H H H H H H H H H H H NSH H SH SH H H SH H NS NSH SH H H

Landscape M M TM M M M T T TM TM TM TM M M T TM M M TM T T T T T TM T T T TM T TM T T TM TM TM TM TM TM T TM T T M TM TM T T TM M M TM T TM T TM TM

1884 1888 1961 1956 1897 1855 1986 1900 1867 1870 1966 1995 1942 1819 1819

1974 1872

1930 1872 1880

1966 1872 1940

1950 1819

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

153
LH a a a a a a pe pe ab a pe a a ab ab ab ab ab a ab b pe pe pe b pe a pe a pe a a a a a a a a ab a a a a a a s a ts a pe pe pe s pe t t pe a a Source K K K K, Dvok & Khn 1966 Dvok & Khn 1966 K, Kubt 1979 F K, Vopravil 1950-1951 K K, Jehlk 1998 Dostl 1989 K Dvok & Khn 1966 F, Slavk 1996b F F F F, Slavk 1996c F F, tpnek 1983 F, tpnek 1983 F F F, Kirschner & tpnek 1984 F F F K F F, Sutor 1982 F F F F F F, Unar 1978 F F F F F, Chrtek & Ksa 1970 F F F F F, Eitel 1982 K F, Smrek & Malina 1984 F F F F F F K F F

Syntaxa

Abund LocNo Intr 1 1 5 1 1 1 2 4 5 4 1 3 1 1 5 1 2 1 3 4 3 1 1 1 5 2 4 1 2 2 1 5 4 5 1 1 3 1 2 5 2 3 2 5 5 2 2 1 1 2 1 4 2 4 1 1 5 a a a a a a d a a a d a a a a ad ad a ad a a d d d a d a d d a a a a a a a d ad d a a d d d ad d a d d d d d d d d a a

Origin AMS AMN E AS AS E AS AF AS E AMN AMN AMN AMN AMS AMN AS E AS E AS E AS E AS E AS AF E E E E AMN E AS AF E E E AMN E AS AMN E E AS AF E AS AF AS E E AMN AMN E E AS AS AS AS E AS AS E AS AF AS AMN E AS AS E AS AMN E E E AS

e r Er sc e se e Ae Ai r CE At r DM Al CA Ar c Si DM sc se r se e AS Ab PF KP AF Cl DM Oa Si HF Fvc e r e r Si PS SO CA sc Oa DM CA la se se e VE SO Bi Si c r Cl CA Oa r Cr s r r e Cl Sh sc Cl sc VE c MP e e Si VE r e Si r VE Si Cl c DM r r r BS sc Cl Sh Ah Sn VE SO TA c r Th Sn e e e r BS r Si sc r Ai la r r Cl Sh Ah VE sc

154
Taxon Fumaria officinalis subsp. wirtgenii (Koch) Arcang. Fumaria parviflora Lam. Fumaria rostellata Knaf Fumaria schleicheri Soyer-Willemet Fumaria vaillantii subsp. schrammii (Aschers.) Nyman Fumaria vaillantii Loisel. subsp. vaillantii Gagea villosa (M. Bieb.) Duby Gaillardia pulchella Foug. Galega officinalis L. Galeobdolon argentatum Smejkal Galeopsis ladanum L. Galeopsis segetum Necker Galinsoga ciliata (Rafin.) Blake Galinsoga parviflora Cav. Galium parisiense L. Galium rubioides L. Galium spurium L. Galium tricornutum Dandy Galium verrucosum Hudson Gastridium ventricosum (Gouan) Schinz et Thell. Gaudinia fragilis (L.) P. B. Genista sagittalis L. Gentiana lutea L. subsp. lutea Geranium columbinum L. Geranium dissectum L. Geranium ibericum Cav. Geranium macrorrhizum L. Geranium molle L. Geranium pusillum Burm. fil. Geranium pyrenaicum Burm. fil. Geranium reflexum L. Geranium rotundifolium L. Geranium sibiricum L. Geranium versicolor L. Geum aleppicum Jacq. Geum gajewskii Smejkal Geum macrophyllum Willd. Geum spurium Fisch. et Mey. Gilia capitata Sims. Gilia multicaulis Bentham Gilia tricolor Bentham Glaucium corniculatum (L.) J. H. Rudolph Glaucium flavum Crantz Glyceria striata (Lamk.) A. S. Hitchc. Glyceria stricta Hook Glycine max (L.) Merrill Glycyrrhiza glabra L. Grindelia squarrosa (Pursh) Dunal Guizotia abyssinica (L. fil.) Cass. Gypsophila elegans M. Bieb. Gypsophila scorzonerifolia Ser. Helianthus annuus L. Helianthus laetiflorus Pers. Helianthus petiolaris Nutt. Helianthus rigidus (Cass.) Desf. Helianthus salicifolius A. Dietr. Helianthus strumosus L. Fam Fum Fum Fum Fum Fum Fum Lil Com Fab Lam Lam Lam Com Com Rub Rub Rub Rub Rub Gra Gra Fab Gen Ger Ger Ger Ger Ger Ger Ger Ger Ger Ger Ger Ros Ros Ros Ros Pole Pole Pole Pap Pap Gra Gra Fab Fab Com Com Car Car Com Com Com Com Com Com Stat nat cas nat* nat* nat* nat* nat* cas nat inv nat* cas inv inv cas cas nat* nat cas cas cas nat nat nat* nat* cas cas# nat nat inv cas cas nat cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas nat* cas nat cas cas nat# cas# cas cas cas cas nat cas cas cas cas Res arN ar ar ar arM arI ar neo neo neo arM neo neo neo neo neo arN arM neo neo neo neo neo arB arN neo neo ar arB neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

1st

Landuse H H H SH SH SH SH H SH NSH SH SH H H SH S SH SH H H H NS NS NSH H H SH H H H SH H SH H H S SH H S H H NS SH NSH H H SH H H H H H H H H H H

Landscape TM T TM TM TM TM T M TM TM T TM TM TM T T T T T M M T T T T TM TM T TM TM T TM TM M TM T TM TM T TM TM T T T M TM T T TM TM TM TM TM M M TM M

1819

1852 1901 1867 1835 1852

1822 1961 1928

1965

1819 1992 1851 1850 1986 1923 1956 1956 1982

1900 1961 1958 1900

1968 1900 1872 1974 1973

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

155
LH a a a a a a pe a pe pe a a a a a pe a a a a a ss pe ab a pe pe ab ab b pe pe a pe pe pe pe pe pe pe a ab ab b pe pe pe a pe a pe a a pe a pe a pe pe pe Source F F F F F F K K F F, Smejkal 1975a F F K K F, Kaplan & ehoek 1998 F F F F K, Dvok & Khn 1966 K F, Skalick 1993 F F, Slavk 1997a F F, Slavk 1997a F, Slavk 1997b F, Slavk 1997b F, Slavk 1997b F, Slavk 1997b F F, Slavk 1997a F, Slavk 1997a F, Chrtek 1989 F, Domin 1923, Smejkal 1988, 1989b F, Smejkal 1959 F F F F F F K, Dank 2002 Dvok & Khn 1966 F F K K, Smejkal 1989a F F, Grll & Smejkal 1966 K, Jehlk 1998 K K K K

Syntaxa Cl Sh Ah VE VE VE Cl Sh VE Si GA PS Cl VE Si PS Cl Sh VE Si PS Bd VE BR Ab Sf Pa Ar DM Oa Ai BS TA Ae Sh Sc Cl CE VE PS VE PS

Abund LocNo Intr c e sc sc r sc sc r r sc sc r c c e e sc r e se r r r sc sc r r r c c r r r e r e r e s r r r e r se r r r r r r sc sc se r se se 5 2 5 5 3 5 4 1 4 4 4 2 5 5 2 1 5 4 1 1 1 3 1 5 5 1 2 3 5 5 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 5 5 1 1 1 1 a ad a a a a a d d d a d a a ad a a a ad a a ad d a a d d a a ad d a ad a ad a ad a d d a d a a d d d ad ad d d d d d d d

Origin E AS E AS AF E E AS E E AS E AMN E E AS E AMC AMS AMS E AS AF E E AS E AF E AF E AF E E E E AS AF E AS AS E E AS AF E AS E AS E E AS E AS E AMN E AS AMN AS AMN AMN AMN E AS E AMN AU AS E AS AMN AF E AS AS AMN AMN AMN AMN AMN AMN

Cl Sh Cl

GQ Vc EC Ge Bd Gs DM Sc AF VE Sh SO

VE Si VE Si SO Cl Sh Si GA MP Ae

Fv Cl AS

DM

Si Sf Ar Ae

156
Taxon Helianthus tuberosus L. Heliopsis helianthoides (L.) Sweet Heliotropium europaeum L. Helleborus foetidus L. Helleborus niger L. Helleborus odorus W. et K. Helleborus viridis L. Helminthotheca echioides (L.) Holub Hemerocallis fulva (L.) L. Hemerocallis lilioasphodelus L. Heracleum mantegazzianum Sommier et Levier Heracleum persicum Desf. ex Fischer, Meyer et Lalem. Herniaria cinerea DC. Herniaria hirsuta L. Hesperis matronalis subsp. candida (Kit. ex Schulzer, Kanitz et Knapp) Thell. Hesperis matronalis L. subsp. matronalis Hesperis matronalis subsp. oblongifolia (Schur) Dvok Hesperis matronalis subsp. oblongipetala (Borbs) Dvok Hesperis pycnotricha Borbs et Degen Hibiscus trionum L. Hieracium pannosum Boissier Hippocrepis emerus (L.) Lassen Hippopha rhamnoides L. subsp. rhamnoides Hirschfeldia incana (L.) Lagreze-Fossat Hordeum distichon L. Hordeum geniculatum All. Hordeum jubatum L. Hordeum leporinum Link Hordeum marinum Huds. Hordeum murinum L. Hordeum secalinum Schreber Hordeum vulgare L. Hosta plantaginea (Lamk.) Aschers. Humulus scandens (Lour.) Merrill Hyacinthella leucophaea (C. Koch) Schur Hyacinthella rumelica Velen. Hylotelephium anacampseros (L.) Ohba Hylotelephium ewersii (Ledeb.) Ohba Hylotelephium spectabile (Boreau) Ohba Hyoscyamus albus L. Hyoscyamus niger L. Hyparrhenia hirta (L.) Stapf Hyssopus officinalis L. Iberis amara L. Iberis sempervirens L. Iberis umbellata L. Impatiens balfouri Hooker fil. Impatiens balsamina L. Impatiens glandulifera Royle Impatiens parviflora DC. Impatiens scabrida DC. Imperatoria ostruthium L. Imperatoria verticillaris (L.) DC. Inula helenium L. Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. Ipomoea purpurea (L.) Roth Iris germanica L. Fam Com Com Bor Ran Ran Ran Ran Com Hem Hem Api Api Car Car Bra Bra Bra Bra Bra Mal Com Fab Ela Bra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Aga Can Hya Hya Cra Cra Cra Sol Sol Gra Lam Bra Bra Bra Bal Bal Bal Bal Bal Api Api Com Con Con Lil Stat inv cas nat* cas cas cas# nat cas cas cas inv cas cas nat* cas nat cas cas cas nat cas# cas cas cas cas cas nat cas cas nat* cas cas cas# cas cas# cas# cas cas cas cas nat* cas cas cas cas# cas cas cas inv inv cas inv* cas nat cas cas nat Res neo neo arB neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar neo neo neo neo neo ar neo neo neo neo ar neo neo neo neo arI neo ar neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo arN neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

1st 1885

Landuse NSH H H H SH N SH H SH SH NSH H H H SH NSH SH SH H H S S H H H H H H H H H H H H N NSH H H H H H H SH SH H H S H NSH NS S SH H SH H H NSH

Landscape TM TM T T T T T TM TM TM TM TM M T T T T T M TM T T M M TM M M M M TM M TM T TM T T T T T T T M T TM TM TM TM TM TM TM T T M T TM TM T

1874 1819 1861 1883 1883 1862 1960

1909 1817 1933 1909 1950 1978 1891 1902 1956 1961 1967

1960 1900

1890 1961 1819 1888 1880

1896 1870 1986 1809 1960 1819 1972 1969 1867

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

157
LH Source K K F F F Dostl 1948-1950, uk 2001 F K K K F, Pyek 1991, 1994, Pyek et al. 1995a, Pyek & Pyek 1994 F F F F, Dvok 1968 F, Dvok 1968 F, Dvok 1968 F, Dvok 1968 F F F F F, Jehlk 1998 K K, Dvok & Khn 1966 K K K K K K F uk 2001 Dostl 1989, uk 2001 F F F F F K, Dvok & Khn 1966 F F F F F F F, Daumann 1967, Pyek & Prach 1995a,b, Slavk 1996a F, Vratil1952, Daumann 1967, Slavk 1996a F F, Kopeck 1973 F K K F K

Syntaxa Al Ae Er VE Oa

Abund LocNo Intr c r e r r r sc r r r la s r r sc sc r r s r s e r r r r sc se r c r sc r r s r r r r e sc se sc r r r r r la c e la e sc r r sc 5 1 2 2 2 1 3 3 4 1 5 1 1 3 2 5 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 5 5 1 5 1 4 1 2 4 d d ad d d d d a d d d d a a d d d ad d ad d d d a d a d a a a a d d d d d d d d a a a d d d d d d d d d d a d a d d

Origin AMN AMN E AS AF E AF E E E E E E E AS E AS AF E AS AF E E E E E E AS E AS E AS AF E AS E AS AF E E AS AMN E AS E E AS E

DM BS BR Ae Ae BS SS Ct Ar

MP Al IS BS Ae Pe

Er Si

Si MP

Si

Pa Si Si

Oa Si

Sf St Ae Ph Cr Fg TA CR BS SS IS GA Ae PT Pe Ae Ad Pa Ae

CA Fv

pe pe a pe pe pe pe pe pe pe b pe b pe a a pe pe pe pe pe b pe a pe s ts ab a a a a a a pe a AS pe AS a E pe E pe E pe AS ss AS pe E AS AF b a pe E AS AF ba E AS pe E ss E a E AS ss E a AS a AS a AS a AS a AS a E pe E pe AS pe AMN AMC AMS a AMC AMS a E pe

158
Taxon Iris pallida Lam. Iris sambucina L. Isatis tinctoria subsp. praecox (Tratt.) Domin et Podp. Isatis tinctoria L. subsp. tinctoria Ismelia versicolor Cass. Iva xanthiifolia Nutt. Juglans nigra L. Juglans regia L. Juncus tenuis Willd. Kickxia elatine subsp. crinita (Mabille) Greuter Kickxia elatine (L.) Dumort. subsp. elatine Kickxia spuria (L.) Dumort. subsp. spuria Kochia scoparia subsp. densiflora (Moq.) Aellen Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrader subsp. scoparia Kochia scoparia subsp. scoparia f. trichophylla Schinz et Thell Laburnum anagyroides Med. Lactuca sativa L. Lactuca serriola L Lactuca tatarica (L.) C. A. Meyer Lactuca virosa L. Lagurus ovatus L. Lamium album L. Lamium amplexicaule L. Lamium hybridum Vill. Lamium moluccellifolium Fries Lamium orvala L. Lamium purpureum L. Lappula patula (Lehm.) Menyh. Lappula squarrosa (Retz.) Dumort Lapsana communis L. subsp. communis Lathyrus annuus L. Lathyrus aphaca L. Lathyrus articulatus L. Lathyrus cicera L. Lathyrus clymenum L. Lathyrus odoratus L. Lathyrus ochrus (L.) DC. Lathyrus sativus L. Lathyrus tingitanus L. Lathyrus tuberosus L. Lavandula angustifolia Mill. Lavatera trimestris L. Lawrencia glomerata Hooker Legousia hybrida (L.) Delarbre Legousia speculum-veneris (L.) Chaix Lemna turionifera Landolt Lens culinaris Med. Leontopodium alpinum Cass. Leonurus cardiaca L. Leonurus intermedius Holub Leonurus japonicus Houtt. Leonurus villosus Dum.-dUrv. Lepidium africanum (Burm. fil.) DC. Lepidium campestre (L.) R. Br. Lepidium densiflorum Schrad. Lepidium heterophyllum Bentham Lepidium latifolium L. Fam Lil Lil Bra Bra Com Com Jug Jug Jun Scr Scr Scr Chen Chen Chen Fab Com Com Com Com Gra Lam Lam Lam Lam Lam Lam Bor Bor Com Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Lam Mal Mal Cam Cam Lem Fab Com Lam Lam Lam Lam Bra Bra Bra Bra Bra Stat cas cas cas nat cas nat cas nat inv cas nat* nat* cas inv cas nat cas nat* cas cas cas nat nat* cas cas cas nat* cas nat* nat* cas nat* cas cas cas cas cas cas cas nat* cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas# nat* nat cas nat cas nat* nat cas cas Res neo neo neo ar neo neo neo arP neo neo ar ar neo neo neo neo neo arM neo neo neo arB arI neo ar neo arN neo ar arN neo ar neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo arM neo neo neo neo arR neo neo neo

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

1st 1867 1921

Landuse SH SH S NS H H S NSH SH H H H H H H SH H H H H H SH SH H H S H H NSH NSH H NSH H SH H H H H H SH SH H H H H S H NS H H H H H SH NSH H H

Landscape TM TM T T TM TM T TM T T T T M M TM T TM TM M T M TM TM TM TM T TM M T T M T TM TM M TM M T TM T TM TM M TM TM TM TM T T T TM T M T TM M TM

1851 1934

1901 1819 1819 1900

1957 1872

1946

1960

1874

1961 1809 1809 1997 1819 1901 1887 1934 1899 1964 1904 1900

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

159
LH pe pe b pe b pe a a t t pe a a a a a a st a a pe a a pe a ? ? pe ab a ab a a a a a a a a a a pe ss a pe a a a pe a pe pe pe pe pe a ab ab pe pe Source K K F F K K, Lhotsk & Slavk 1969, Hejn et al. 1973, Jehlk 1998 F F K F F F F, Jehlk 1998 F, Jehlk 1998 F F K K K, Hejn et al. 1973, Jehlk 1980, 1998 K K F F, Ko l 1903 F, Otruba 1946 F F F F, Holub 1974 F K F F, Chrtkov et al. 1977 F F F F F F F F F F F, Dvok & Khn 1966 F F K, Kaplan 2000 F K F, Holub 1993 Holub 1993 F Holub 1993 F F F, Hejn et al. 1973 F F

Syntaxa

Abund LocNo Intr s r s la r sc r la c se r r sc sc sc la r c r e r c sc r r r c e sc c e r e r e r e r r sc r r se r r s r r sc sc e r se sc la r r 1 2 1 4 1 4 1 5 5 1 4 4 3 5 3 4 4 5 3 1 2 5 5 1 1 1 5 1 5 5 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 5 1 2 1 1 1 1 3 2 5 4 1 3 1 5 4 2 2 d d a d d a d d a a a a a a d d d a a a d a a a a d a a a a a a a ad a d a d d a d d a d d a d d ad ad a ad a a a a ad

Origin E AS E E AF AMN AMN E AS AMN E AS AF E E AS AF AS E AS E AS E AS E AS E AS E E E AS E AS AF E E E AS AF E AS AF E AS E AS E AS E AS AF E AF E AS AF E AS AF E E AS AF E AS AF E AF E AS E E AU E E AS AMN E AS E AS AS E AS AF E AS AMN E E AS

DM Fv AF Si BS Cr Qp AQ BR Bd Ar Al NJ Cy Sh Cl Cl Si Si Sr Si Bd Si Si Si Al

Al Ae Si Sh Cl VE Ab AS

Ae Ai VE Sh Cl Si Oa Si GA IS TA Fv Gs Ar CA Pa Cl

Cl CA DM

Le

Al Ae Al Ae Al Ae Bd Ar,KP Ab DM PF DM Co Sr Al MP CA Si

160
Taxon Lepidium perfoliatum L. Lepidium ruderale L. Lepidium sativum L. Lepidium virginicum L. Leptochloa chinensis Nees Leptochloa fascicularis (Lamk.) A. Gray Leptochloa filiformis (Lamk.) P. B. Lepyrodiclis holosteoides (C. A. Meyer) Fisch. et Mey. Leucanthemella serotina (L.) Tzvelev Leucosinapis alba (L.) Spach Leucosinapis dissecta (Lag.) Zelen Levisticum officinale Koch Leymus arenarius (L.) Hochst. Linaria arvensis (L.) Desf. Linaria maroccana Hooker Linaria repens (L.) Mill. Linaria vulgaris Mill. Lindernia dubia (L.) Pennell Linum usitatissimum L. Lithospermum arvense L. subsp. arvense Lithospermum arvense subsp. caerulescens (DC.) Rothm. Lobelia erinus L. Lobularia maritima (L.) Desv. Lolium loliaceum (Bory et Chaub.) Hand. - Mazz. Lolium multiflorum Lamk. Lolium remotum Schrank Lolium rigidum Gaudin Lolium temulentum L. Lonicera caprifolium L. Lonicera tatarica L. Lunaria annua L. Lupinus albus L. Lupinus angustifolius L. Lupinus luteus L. Lupinus polyphyllus Lindl. Luzula nivea (Nath.) DC. Lychnis chalcedonica L. Lychnis coronaria (L.) Desr. Lycium barbarum L. Lycium chinense Mill. Lycopsis arvensis L. Lycopsis orientalis L. Lycopus europaeus subsp. menthifolius (Mabille) Skalick Lysimachia punctata L. Lythrum junceum Banks et Solander Macleaya cordata (Willd.) R. Br. Madia sativa Molina Mahonia aquifolium (Pursh) Nutt. Majorana hortensis Moench Malcolmia africana (L.) R. Br. Malcolmia chia (L.) DC. Malcolmia maritima (L.) R. Br. Malope trifida Cav. Malus dasyphylla Borkh. Malus domestica Borkh. Malva adulterina Wallr. Malva crispa (L.) L. Fam Bra Bra Bra Bra Gra Gra Gra Car Com Bra Bra Api Gra Scr Scr Scr Scr Scr Lin Bor Bor Cam Bra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Cap Cap Bra Fab Fab Fab Fab Jun Car Car Sol Sol Bor Bor Lam Pri Lyt Pap Com Ber Lam Bra Bra Bra Mal Ros Ros Mal Mal Stat cas nat* cas cas cas cas cas cas cas nat cas cas cas nat* cas cas nat* cas cas nat* cas cas cas cas nat cas cas cas nat cas# nat cas cas cas# inv nat cas nat inv cas# nat* cas cas nat cas cas cas inv cas cas cas cas cas nat cas cas cas Res neo arR neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar neo neo ar neo ar arN neo neo neo neo neo arI neo arB neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo arB neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar ar ar neo

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

1st 1872 1874 1936

Landuse H H H H H H H H N H H H N H H NSH SH S H SH H H H H H H H H NSH SH NSH H SH SH NS SH H NS NSH H H H H SH H H H NSH H H H H H NS NSH H H

Landscape TM TM TM TM M M M T T TM M T T T TM TM TM T TM T T TM M M TM T TM T T TM TM M TM T T T TM T TM T T TM T TM M TM M TM TM M M M TM T TM T TM

1961 1967 1875 1953 1809

1934 1989

1867 1963 1883

1809 1872 1819 1878 1900 1880 1895

1879 1870

1911 1880 1819 1965

1935 1850 1969

1853

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

161
LH a ab a ab a a a a pe a a pe pe a a pe pe a ab a a a pe a a pe a a a s s b a a a pe pe pe pe b s s ab ab pe pe pe pe a s ab a a a a t ts ? a Source F F F F, Hejn et al. 1973 K K K, Dvok & Khn 1966 F K F F F K F, Suda 1999, 2001 F F F F, Kurka 1990 F F F F F K K K K, Dvok & Khn 1966 K F F F F F F F K F F F F F F, Krahulec 1981 F, Skalick 1968 F F, Toman & Star 1966 F K F F F, Krist 1940 F F F F F F F

Syntaxa Si DM MP DM Si MP

Abund LocNo Intr r c r sc r r r r e sc e r r r r r c s sc sc se r r s c e r e sc r sc r r e c r r r sc s sc r se c se r r la r e e r r sc sc r r 3 5 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 3 1 4 1 2 5 1 5 5 1 2 2 1 5 3 1 4 4 2 4 2 2 2 5 1 2 4 5 1 5 1 1 4 1 1 1 5 2 1 1 1 2 4 5 2 4 ad a d ad a a a a a ad a d d a a ad a a d a a d d a d a a a d d d ad ad d d d d ad d d a a a d a d a d d a d d d a d a d

Origin E E AS AF AMN AMC AS AMN AMS AMC AMS AS E AS E AS E AS E E AF AF E E AS AMN E AS E AS E AS AF E E AS E E AS E E AS E E E E AMN E E AS E AS AF E AS AS E E AS E E E AS AMC AMN E E AS AF E E E AF

Si VE Ae Ad Ah SO Sc DM DM CA Si Cl Sh VE AS Cl

Pa Ar Ah Ah Cr Bd CR TA Ae GA Si

CE Ar

Fv Bd Qt Ar BS BR SO PS

Ae Ap Ar Ct PT CE

Bd Qt CR

Bd Cr PR Bd BS SS Mn MP Si Al

AS

162
Taxon Malva neglecta Wallr. Malva parviflora L. Malva pusilla Sm. Malva sylvestris L. Malva verticillata L. Malva zoernigii Fleischer Mantisalca salmantica (L.) Briq. Marrubium paniculatum Desr. Marrubium peregrinum L. Marrubium vulgare L. Matricaria discoidea DC. Matteucia struthiopteris (L.) Tod. Matthiola incana (L.) R. Br. subsp. incana Matthiola longipetala subsp. bicornis (Sibth. et Sm.) P. W. Ball Matthiola longipetala (Vent.) DC. subsp. longipetala Medicago arabica (L.) Hudson Medicago disciformis DC. Medicago lupulina L. Medicago orbicularis (L.) Bartal. Medicago polymorpha L. Medicago rigidula (L.) Desr. Medicago sativa L. subsp. sativa Medicago varia Martyn Melampyrum arvense L. Melampyrum barbatum Willd. subsp. barbatum Melica altissima L. Melilotus albus Med. Melilotus indicus (L.) All. Melilotus messanensis (L.) All. Melilotus officinalis (L.) Pallas Melilotus sulcatus Desf. Melilotus wolgicus Poiret Melissa officinalis L. subsp. officinalis Mentha arvensis L. Mentha dalmatica Tausch Mentha gracilis Sole Mentha niliaca Jacq. Mentha piperita L. nothosubsp. piperita Mentha rotundifolia (L.) Huds. Mentha spicata L. subsp. spicata Mentha spicata L. s.l. Mentha verticilata L. Mercurialis annua L. Mespilus germanica L. Microrrhinum litorale (Willd.) Speta Microrrhinum minus (L.) Fourr. Mimulus guttatus DC. Mimulus moschatus Lindl. Mirabilis jalapa L. Miscanthus sinensis N. J. Andersson Misopates orontium (L.) Rafin. Monolepis nuttaliana (Schult.) Greene Myagrum perfoliatum L. Myosotis arvensis (L.) Hill subsp. arvensis Myosotis krajinae Domin Myosotis pseudohispida Domin Myrrhis odorata (L.) Scop. Fam Mal Mal Mal Mal Mal Mal Com Lam Lam Lam Com Dry Bra Bra Bra Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Scr Scr Gra Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Lam Lam Lam Lam Lam Lam Lam Lam Lam Lam Eup Ros Scr Scr Scr Scr Nyc Gra Scr Chen Bra Bor Bor Bor Api Stat nat* cas nat* nat* cas cas cas cas nat* nat* inv nat cas cas cas cas cas nat cas cas cas nat nat* nat* cas nat inv cas cas inv cas cas cas nat* cas nat cas cas nat* nat nat nat nat* cas cas nat* inv* nat cas cas nat* cas cas nat* cas cas inv* Res arI neo arN ar neo ar neo ar ar arM neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar neo neo neo neo neo ar neo neo ar neo neo arM neo neo neo ar ar neo neo neo neo neo neo ar arB ar neo ar neo neo neo neo ar neo neo arB ar ar neo

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

1st 1957

Landuse H H H H H H H H SH H H NSH H H H H H SH H H SH SH NSH NS SH SH SH H H SH H H H SH SH H SH H SH SH SH NSH H NS H NSH NS NS H SH H H H SH N H NS

Landscape T TM T T TM T TM T T T TM T TM TM M M M TM M M T TM T T T T TM M M TM M M TM TM TM TM T TM TM TM TM T TM T M T T T M T T M TM TM T T T

1851 1820 1877 1952 1924 1936 1963

1880 1923 1819

1893 1955 1913 1929 1929 1963 1872

1855 1976 1840 1846 1818 1844

1994 1853 1868

1927 1855

1809

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

163
LH Source F F F F F F K F F F K F, Hendrych 1984 F F F F F F F F F F F F F K, Pyek 1997 F F F F F F F F, tpnek 1998 F, tpnek 1998 F, tpnek 1998 F, tpnek 1998 F, tpnek 1998 F, tpnek 1998 F, tpnek 1998 F, tpnek 1998 F, tpnek 1998 F F F, Mikol 1997 F F F F K F F F, Sutor 1982 F F F F, Lhotsk 1975

Syntaxa Mn MP Oa Mn MP Oa Si Oa Al Si DM

Abund LocNo Intr c e sc sc r e r r r r c r r r e r e c e r e c sc sc e r c r e c e e r c sc sc r sc c r r c c r r sc sc r r r r e r c s r la 5 1 5 4 3 1 1 1 4 4 5 3 1 1 1 2 1 5 1 2 1 5 5 5 1 1 5 2 1 5 1 1 3 5 4 4 2 3 5 3 3 5 5 3 1 5 5 3 2 1 4 1 2 5 1 2 5 ad a ad d d a a a a ad a d d d a a a ad a a a d ad a a d ad a a ad a a d a ad d d d d d? d a a d a a d d d d a a a a a a d

Origin AS E AS AS E AS AS

Oa CA Al Oa CA Al Oa Mn Al MP Ai An IS Ae

MP Si CA Cl VE Cy Ar DM

DM CA Br Ar Br CA Gs Tm Br Ar KP Cl Sh Fv Ar DM Si Al CA

DM Si Al CA

Ae BS Ah Sh VE SO Pa Ae Ae Pa Ae Pa Pa Ae Ar Pe Al Pa Pa Ap Pa SG Pr Ph VE GQ Bd DM Sc Sr DM SG CM Ct SG CM Pa Ct Si VE Cl Sh

Cl Sh Ah PS Si Sr SO Ab

Ae PT CE

b pe a a b pe a b pe ? E pe pe E pe E pe AS a E AS AMN f E ab E AS a E AS a E AF a E a E AS AF a pe E AS a E a E a AS pe AS pe E AS ap E ap E AS pe E AS ba E AS a E a E AS b E a E b E AS pe E AS pe pe E pe pe E pe pe E pe E pe pe E AF a E AS ts E a E AS AF a AMN pe AMN pe AMN AMC AMS pe AS pe E AS AF a AMN AS a E AS a E AS AF a a a E pe

164
Taxon Myrrhoides nodosa (L.) Cannon Narcissus poeticus L. Narcissus pseudonarcissus L. Nemophila menziesii Hooker fil. et Arnott Nepeta cataria L. Nepeta faasenii Stearn Nepeta grandiflora M. Bieb. Nepeta racemosa Lam. Neslia paniculata (L.) Desv. subsp. paniculata Nicandra physalodes (L.) Gaertn. Nicotiana alata Link et Otto Nicotiana rustica L. Nicotiana tabacum L. Nigella arvensis L. Nigella damascena L. Nigella sativa L. Nonea lutea (Desr.) DC. Nonea rosea (M. Bieb.) Link Obione sibirica (L.) Fischer Ocimum basilicum L. Oenothera acutifolia Rostaski Oenothera albipercurva Renner Oenothera ammophila Focke Oenothera biennis L. Oenothera canovirens Steele Oenothera coronifera Renner Oenothera depressa Greene Oenothera fallax Renner emend. Rostaski Oenothera flava subsp. taraxacoides (Woot. et Standl) W. L. Wagner Oenothera glazioviana M. Micheli Oenothera hoelscheri Rostaski Oenothera issleri Rostaski Oenothera missouriensis Sims Oenothera moravica Jehlk et Rostaski Oenothera oakesiana S. Watson et Coulter Oenothera parviflora L. Oenothera punctulata Rostaski et Gutte Oenothera pycnocarpa Atkinson et Bartlett Oenothera rubricaulis Klebahn Oenothera stricta Ledeb. Oenothera subterminalis Gates Oenothera tetragona Roth Oenothera victorini Gates et Catcheside Omphalodes verna Moench Onobrychis viciifolia Scop. Onopordum acanthium L. Onopordum beckianum John Opuntia phaeacantha Engelm. Ornithogalum nutans L. Ornithopus compressus L. Ornithopus sativus Brot. subsp. sativus Orobanche crenata Forska l Orobanche gracilis Sm. Orobanche hederae Duby Orobanche lucorum A. Br. Orobanche minor Sm. Orobanche nana (Reuter) Beck Fam Api Hya Amr Hydp Lam Lam Lam Lam Bra Sol Sol Sol Sol Ran Ran Ran Bor Bor Chen Lam Ona Ona Ona Ona Ona Ona Ona Ona Ona Ona Ona Ona Ona Ona Ona Ona Ona Ona Ona Ona Ona Ona Ona Bor Fab Com Com Cac Lil Fab Fab Oro Oro Oro Oro Oro Oro Stat cas cas cas cas nat* cas cas cas nat* cas cas cas cas nat* cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas inv cas cas nat nat cas nat cas cas cas cas cas cas cas nat nat cas cas cas cas cas nat* nat* cas cas# nat cas cas cas nat nat# nat# inv cas Res neo neo neo neo arN neo neo neo arR neo neo neo neo arR neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo arM neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar neo

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

1st 1997 1867 1867

Landuse H H H S H NSH H NSH H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H SH H H SH H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H SH NS H H S SH H SH H S H H H H

Landscape M TM TM TM T T TM T T M M TM TM T TM TM TM TM M TM M M M TM M M TM M TM M M M M M M M M M M T M TM M T T T TM T T M T T T TM TM T T

1900

1853 1891 1891 1874

1872 1939 1975 1899 1848 1831 1953 2001 1936 1961 2000 1890 1975 1949 1913 1985 1962 1914 1972 1960 1914 1825 1967 1884 1973 1852 1906 1809 1937 1889 1896 1878 1945

1985

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

165
LH a pe pe a pe pe pe pe a a a a a a a a a a a a b b b ba b b b b pe b b b pe b b b b ab b ab b pe b pe pe b b pe pe a a b pe p b pe p b pe p b pe p b pe p a b pe p Source K, Filippov 1999 K K K F F F, Holub 1991 F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F, Jehlk & Rostaski 1980 F F F, Roubal 1972 K, Chrtek & Skodopolov 2001a, Prochzka 2002 F F F F F F F F F F, Roubal 1968 F F F F F F K Sutor 2001 K K F F F F F F F, Krop 1997, Jehlk 1998 F

Syntaxa Ar Ae Ar Ae Al Oa Si

Abund LocNo Intr s r r r sc r r r c r r r r sc r r r r e r r r r c r s r sc s sc r r r r e r s r sc e r e r r sc la se r r e r e e r s r e 1 4 4 1 5 2 2 2 5 2 1 1 1 4 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 5 1 1 3 3 1 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 1 1 1 2 2 5 5 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 a d d d ad d d d a d d d d a d d d a a d a a ad ad a a a a d d a a d a a ad a a a a a ad a d d a a d d a ad ad a d d a ad

Origin E AS E E AMN E AS E E AS AS AMS AMS AMN AMS E AS AF E AS AS E AS AS

Cl Sh Ah VE Si

Cl Oa

DM DM DM DM DM DM DM DM

AMN

AMN

DM DM

AMS AMN E E AS E

Br Fv Ar Oa

Ae An CR

Sh Ah Ar

E E AS AF E E E E AS E E AS AF E

166
Taxon Orobanche ramosa L. Oxalis corniculata L. Oxalis debilis Humboldt, Bonpland et Kunth Oxalis dillenii Jacq. Oxalis fontana Bunge Oxalis latifolia Humboldt, Bonpland et Kunth Oxalis pes-caprae L. Oxalis repens Thunb. Oxybaphus nyctagineus (Michx) Sweet Paeonia officinalis L. Panicum capillare subsp. barbipulvinatum (Nash) Tzvelev Panicum capillare L. subsp. capillare Panicum compressum Bivona Panicum dichotomiflorum Michx. Panicum miliaceum subsp. agricolum H. Scholz et Mikol Panicum miliaceum L. subsp. miliaceum Panicum miliaceum subsp. ruderale (Kitagawa) Tzvelev Panicum obtusum Humboldt, Bonpland et Kunth Panicum oligosanthes Schult. Papaver argemone L. Papaver atlanticum subsp. mesatlanticum (Maire) Kadereit Papaver croceum Ledeb. Papaver dubium L. Papaver hybridum L. Papaver lecoqii Lamotte Papaver pseudo-orientale (Fedde) Medvedev Papaver rhoeas L. Papaver somniferum L. subsp. somniferum Parapholis strigosa (Dum.) C. E. Hubbard Parentucellia viscosa (L.) Caruel Parietaria judaica L. Parietaria officinalis L. Parietaria pennsylvanica Willd. Parthenocissus inserta (Kerner) Fritsch Parthenocissus quinquefolia (L.) Planchon Pastinaca sativa L. subsp. sativa Pastinaca sativa subsp. urens (Godron) elak. Paulownia tomentosa (Thunb.) Steudel Peltaria alliacea Jacq. Pentaglottis sempervirens (L.) Tausch ex L. H. Bailey Persicaria orientalis (L.) Spach Persicaria pennsylvanica (L.) M. Gmez Persicaria polystachya (Wall. ex Meisner) H. Gross Petasites japonicus (Sieb. et Zucc.) F. W. Schmidt Petroselinum crispum (Mill.) A.W. Hill Petunia atkinsiana Loudon Peucedanum austriacum (Jacq.) Koch Phacelia campanularia A. Gray Phacelia ciliata A. Gray Phacelia tanacetifolia Bentham Phalaris arundinacea var. picta L. Phalaris brachystachys Link Phalaris canariensis L. Phalaris coerulescens Desf. Phalaris minor Retz. Phalaris paradoxa L. Phaseolus coccineus L. Fam Oro Oxa Oxa Oxa Oxa Oxa Oxa Oxa Nyc Pae Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Pap Pap Pap Pap Pap Pap Pap Pap Pap Gra Scr Urt Urt Urt Vit Vit Api Api Scr Bra Bor Poly Poly Poly Com Api Sol Api Hydp Hydp Hydp Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Fab Stat nat* nat cas nat nat cas cas cas nat cas cas nat cas cas cas cas nat cas cas nat* cas cas nat* cas nat cas nat* cas cas cas cas nat* cas inv nat nat* nat cas cas cas cas cas inv cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas Res arI neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo arN neo neo neo arN neo neo arM neo ar neo arN ar neo neo neo ar neo neo neo ar ar neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

1st 1852 1963 1852 1963 1961 1843 1968 1940 1961 1970 1975 1823 1961

Landuse H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H SH H H SH H H H H H H SH H NSH H NSH NSH SH SH H N H H H SH SH H H S H H H SH H H H H H H

Landscape T TM M TM TM M M TM TM TM M M M M TM T M M M T M TM T TM T TM TM TM M T TM T M TM TM TM TM M T TM TM M T TM TM M T TM TM TM T TM TM M TM TM TM

2001

1865

1882

2000 1900

1993 1989 1968

1837

1891 1961 1867 1961 1961

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

167
LH a b pe p a b pe pe a b pe a b pe pe pe a b pe pe pe a a a a a a a pe pe a pe pe a a a pe a a a ap a pe pe a s s b pe b pe t pe pe a a pe pe b a pe a a a pe a a pe a a pe Source F, Jehlk 1998 F F, Holub & Holubikov 1980, Jehlk 1995, 1998 F F F, Jehlk 1995, 1998 Dvok & Khn 1966 F F, Jehlk 1998 F K, Jehlk 1998 K, Jehlk 1998 Dvok & Khn 1966 K, Jehlk 1998 K, Jehlk 1998 K K, Jehlk 1998 K, Dvok & Khn 1966 K F F F F F F F F K F F F K F F F F F K, Mandk 1995 F, Zlmalk 1996, Holub 1996 F K F K F F F F F F K K, Dvok & Khn 1966 K, Dvok & Khn 1966 K K, Dvok & Khn 1966 K, Dvok & Khn 1966 F

Syntaxa Er PS SO VE VE PS SO SO CE Ae Cr Ai Sa VE MP VE Oa Ar

Abund LocNo Intr e r s r sc r r r r r r sc se sc sc r sc se r c r r sc e r r c sc r e e sc r la sc c sc r s s r r sc r sc r e r r r sc se sc r se se s 3 4 1 2 5 1 1 3 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 4 2 1 1 5 1 1 5 1 1 1 5 4 1 1 1 3 1 5 3 5 4 2 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 4 1 1 1 4 5 2 2 2 2 2 1 a a a a a a a ad ad d a a a a a d a a a a d d a a a d a d a a a ad a d d ad a d a d d a d d d d a d d d d a a a a a d

Origin E AS AF E AS AU AF AMS AMN AMN AMC AMS AF AS AU AMN AMC E AS AMN AMN E AMN E AS AS AMC AMS AMC AMS E AF AS E AS AF E AS AF E AS E AS AF E AS E E E E AMN AMN AMN AS AS AS E E AS AMN AS AS E AS AMS E AMN AMN AMN E AS E E E AS AF E AS AF AMC AMS

Pa Si

PS Er Si Si PS

Ah Cl Sh Fv Ab SO Ah Si Cl Sh AS

Cl Sh Ah Si Si

TA Ai BS IS GA Al Si Ai BS CR Ae BS Ae Ar DM Ar DM

Ae Si Si

Ah Sh Si Ae Al Ar

168
Taxon Phaseolus vulgaris L. Philadelphus coronarius L. Phleum paniculatum Huds. Phleum subulatum (Savi) A. et Gr. Phlox drummondii Hooker Phlox paniculata L. Phlox subulata L. Pholiurus incurvus Schinz et Thell. Physalis alkekengi L. var. alkekengi Physalis alkekengi var. franchetii (Masters) Makino Physalis angulata L. Physalis peruviana L. Physalis philadelphica Lam. Physalis pubescens L. Physocarpus opulifolius (L.) Maxim. Phytolacca americana L. Phytolacca esculenta Van Houtte Pimpinella anisum L. Pinus nigra Arnold Pinus strobus L. Pistia stratiotes L. Pisum sativum L. Plantago afra L. Plantago alpina L. Plantago coronopus L. subsp. coronopus Plantago gentianoides Sibth. et Sm.. Plantago major L. subsp. major Plantago mixta Domin Plantago moravica Chrtek Platanus hispanica Mill. Platycladus orientalis (L.) Franco Polycarpon tetraphyllum (L.) L. Polycnemum arvense L. Polycnemum heuffelii A. F. Lng Polycnemum majus A. Braun Polygonatum latifolium (Jacq.) Desf. Polygonum aviculare L. Polypogon fugax Nees ex Steud. Polypogon monspeliensis (L.) Desf. Populus balsamifera L. Populus canadensis Moench Portulaca grandiflora Hooker Portulaca oleracea L. subsp. oleracea Potentilla fruticosa L. Potentilla intermedia L. Potentilla supina subsp. paradoxa (Nutt.) Sojk Primula vulgaris Huds. subsp. vulgaris Prunus armeniaca L. Prunus cerasifera Ehrh. Prunus cerasus L. Prunus domestica L. Prunus eminens G. Beck Prunus fruticans Weihe Prunus insititia L. Prunus laurocerasus L. Prunus persica (L.) Batsch Prunus serotina Ehrh. Fam Fab Phi Gra Gra Pole Pole Pole Gra Sol Sol Sol Sol Sol Sol Ros Phy Phy Api Pin Pin Ara Fab Plan Plan Plan Plan Plan Plan Plan Plat Cup Car Chen Chen Chen Lil Poly Gra Gra Sal Sal Por Por Ros Ros Ros Pri Ros Ros Ros Ros Ros Ros Ros Ros Ros Ros Stat cas cas# cas cas cas cas cas cas nat cas cas cas cas cas inv cas nat cas nat inv cas cas cas cas# cas cas inv cas cas cas cas cas nat* nat* nat* nat nat* cas cas cas inv cas nat* cas# nat cas nat cas nat nat* nat* nat* nat nat* cas cas inv Res neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar neo neo neo neo ar arch arch neo neo neo ar ar ar neo ar neo neo neo neo neo arR neo neo neo neo ar neo ar ar ar ar ar neo ar neo

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

1st 1819

Landuse H SH H H H H H H NSH SH H H H H NSH NSH H H NS N N H H N H H H SH SH H N H NSH NS NSH H H H H H SH H H S H SH SH H SH NSH SH NS S SH H H NS

Landscape TM TM M M M TM M M TM TM TM TM TM T T T M T T T TM TM TM T M TM TM T T M T M T T T M TM M M M TM M TM T M T T TM T T T T T T M TM TM

1880 1961

1972 1935 2001 1874 1853 1956

1800

1851 1934 1935

1950 1863

1809 1964 1961 1880 1937 1977 1903

2001

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

169
LH a s a pe a a pe pe a pe pe a pe a a s pe pe a t t pe a a pe a pe pe pe pe pe t st a a a a pe a a a t t a a s b pe a pe pe ts ts ts ts s s ts s ts ts Source F F K K F F F Dvok & Khn 1966 F, Hendrych 1989 F F F F, Pyek 1995 F F F F, Skalick 1972 F F F K F F F, Chrtek & Skodopolov 1995 F F F F F F F F F F F, Novk 2001 K F K, Dvok & Khn 1966 K F F, Domin 1937a, Petk 2001 F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F

Syntaxa

Abund LocNo Intr r r r r r r r se sc r se r r s la r r r sc la e r se e e e c e r r r r r e r r c se r r la r sc s r e r r sc sc sc sc r sc r r la 2 3 1 1 1 2 2 1 4 1 1 1 2 1 4 2 3 2 5 5 1 4 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 4 2 4 1 5 1 1 1 4 1 5 1 3 1 2 3 5 5 4 4 4 5 1 3 4 d d a a d d d a d d d d d d d d d d d d d d a d a d a a a d d a a a a d a a a d ad d a d a a a d d d d a a d d d d

Origin AMS E E E AMN AMN AMN E AS E AS AMN AMC AMS AMS AMC AMN AMC AMS AMN AMN AS AS E AMN AS AF AMC AMS E AS E AS E E E E AS AF

CR BS Ai Ae

Ai Ar Ae Al Br Fv Qp Cr DS GQ Le Si Na NA

MP Sg Si Cy

MP Co PF Ah Sn Ab Cl AS Fv Ah Si Cl DM VE SO Si

AS E E AS E E AS E E AS E AS AF E AS AF AMN AMS AS AF AS E AMN AS E AS AF AS E AS E AS

SS St DM Si VE Er PS MP DM MP Bi Pa

BS Bd PR PR Bd BS CR BS Bd PR Ps Gs Bd Bd Ai BS BS Bd PR

GQ SS

AS E AS AS AMN

170
Taxon Prunus virginiana L. Pseudolysimachion incanum (L.) Holub subsp. incanum Pseudolysimachion neglectum (Vahl) Trvnek Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirbel) Franco Puccinellia gigantea (Grossh.) Grossh. Pulmonaria sibirica L. Pulsatilla vulgaris Mill. Pulsatilla slavica Reuss Puschkinia scilloides Adams Pyrethrum macrophyllum (W. et K.) Willd. Pyrus amphigenea Domin ex Dostlek Pyrus communis L. Pyrus nivalis Jacq. Quercus rubra L. Ranunculus acris subsp. friesianus (Jordan) Rouy et Fouc. Ranunculus arvensis L. Raphanus raphanistrum L. Raphanus sativus L. subsp. sativus Rapistrum rugosum subsp. orientale (L.) Arcang. Rapistrum rugosum (L.) All. subsp. rugosum Reseda alba L. subsp. alba Reseda lutea L. subsp. lutea Reseda luteola L. Reseda odorata L. Reseda phyteuma L. Reynoutria bohemica Chrtek et Chrtkov Reynoutria japonica var. compacta Moldenke Reynoutria japonica Houtt. var. japonica Reynoutria sachalinensis (F. Schmidt) Nakai Rhagadiolus stellatus (L.) Gaertn. Rheum rhabarbarum L. Rhus hirta (L.) Sudw. Rhus toxicodendron L. Ribes aureum Pursh Ribes odoratum Wendl. fil. Ribes rubrum L. Ribes spicatum Robson Ricinus communis L. Robinia pseudacacia L. Rodgersia aesculifolia Batalin Rosa alba L. Rosa centifolia L. Rosa foetida J. Herrmann Rosa glauca Pourr. Rosa rugosa Thunb. Rosa villosa L. Rostraria cristata (L.) Tzvelev Rubia tinctorum L. Rubus allegheniensis Porter Rubus armeniacus Focke Rubus canadensis L. Rubus illecebrosus Focke Rubus laciniatus Willd. Rubus moschus Juz. Rubus occidentalis L. Rubus odoratus L. Fam Ros Scr Scr Pin Gra Bor Ran Ran Hya Com Ros Ros Ros Fag Ran Ran Bra Bra Bra Bra Res Res Res Res Res Poly Poly Poly Poly Com Poly Ana Ana Gro Gro Gro Gro Eup Fab Sax Ros Ros Ros Ros Ros Ros Gra Rub Ros Ros Ros Ros Ros Ros Ros Ros Stat cas cas cas nat cas cas cas nat# nat# nat nat nat nat inv cas nat* nat* cas cas cas cas nat nat* cas nat* inv cas inv inv cas cas inv cas cas nat nat* cas cas inv cas cas# cas# cas cas nat# cas cas cas nat nat nat cas nat nat cas nat Res neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar ar ar neo neo arB arN ar neo neo neo arR arN neo ar neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar neo neo neo ar neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

1st

Landuse S H N N H SH NS N NS SH NS NSH NS N H H H H H H H SH SH H NSH NSH SH SH SH H H SH H NSH SH NSH NSH H NSH S H H NS SH SH SH H H NSH H SH SH NSH SH S NS

Landscape T TM T T M T T T T T T TM T TM TM T TM TM T T TM T T T T TM TM TM TM M TM T TM T T T T TM TM T T T T TM TM TM M M T TM TM TM TM TM T T

1940

1852 1856

1882

1940 1850 1840

1900 1942 1995 1892 1869 1929 1967 1900 1874 1900 1809 1885 1996 1874 2001 1874 1814 1874 1950

1800

1997 1880

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

171
LH ts pe pe t a pe pe pe pe pe pe t t t t pe a a ab ab ab a pe a b b a ab pe pe pe pe a pe st s s s s s a ss s t ts pe s s s s s s a pe s s s ss s s s s Source F F, Trvnek 1998 F F K F F F, uk 2001 K K F F F F F F F F F F, Hejn et al. 1973 F F F F F, Roubal 1984, Hendrych 1978 F, Mandk & Pyek 1997 K, Hlavek et al. 1996, Mandk & Pyek 1997 F, Beerling et al. 1994, Mandk & Pyek 1997 F, Beerling et al.1994, Mandk & Pyek 1997, Sukopp & Sukopp 1995 K F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F K F F F F, la & Chn 2001 F F F F F

Syntaxa

Abund LocNo Intr s r se r r r r s r r sc sc e sc r sc c r r r r sc sc r r c r c la e r la r r sc sc r r c s r r r r r r r r r r r s r s s sc 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 3 2 4 5 2 5 1 5 5 2 2 3 1 5 5 2 1 5 1 5 4 1 2 3 1 1 3 5 1 1 5 1 3 3 1 1 3 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 3 d d d d a d d d d d ad d d d a a a d a a d a ad d a ad d d d a d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d a d d d d d d d d d

Origin AMN E AS AMN AS AS E E AS E AS E AS AMN E E AS AF E AS E AS E AS E AS E E AS E E AS AS AS E AS AS AMN AMN AMN AMN E E AF AMN AS AS E AS E AS E E E AS AMN E AMN AS E AS AMN AMN

Cr GQ LF

Fv HS Ar Ae GA Bd Bd BS Bd GQ LF Cr Ar Cy Cl Ah Sh SO Si Si Cl Al Si Cl Al Oa DM CA Br Oa Al Cl Sf Ae BS Sf Ae BS Sf Ae BS

Ai BS

BS TA CR BR

GQ Bd PR Al PR BS

CE

GQ Cr CE

172
Taxon Rubus parviflorus Nutt. Rubus phoenicolasius Maxim. Rubus sylvaticus Weihe et Nees Rubus tuberculatus Bab. Rubus ulmifolius Schott Rubus xanthocarpus Bureau et Franchet Rudbeckia hirta L. Rudbeckia laciniata L. Rumex acetosa L. R. thyrsiflorus Fingerh. Rumex alpinus L. Rumex brownii Campd. Rumex corconticus Kubt Rumex confertus Willd. Rumex dentatus subsp. halacsyi (Rech.) Rech. fil. Rumex hybridus Kindberg Rumex longifolius DC. Rumex mezei Haussknecht Rumex obovatus Danser Rumex patientia L. subsp. patientia Rumex propinquus Aresch Rumex scutatus L. Rumex thyrsiflorus Fingerh. Rumex triangulivalvis (Danser) Rech. fil. Ruta graveolens subsp. hortensis (Mill.) Gams Sagina apetala Ard. subsp. apetala Sagina apetala subsp. erecta (Hornem.) F. Hermann Sagittaria latifolia Willd. Salix sepulcralis Simk. Salix acutifolia Willd. Salsola collina Pallas Salvia officinalis L. Salvia reflexa Hornem. Salvia sclarea L. Salvia spinosa L. Salvia splendens Ker-Gawl. Salvia verbenaca L. Salvia viridis L. Sambucus ebulus L. Sanguisorba minor subsp. polygama (W. et K.) Holub Sanguisorba tenuifolia Fisch. ex Link Saponaria ocymoides L. Saponaria officinalis L. Satureja hortensis L. Saxifraga cuneifolia L. Saxifraga cymbalaria L. Saxifraga geum L. Saxifraga hostii Tausch subsp. hostii Saxifraga hypnoides L. Saxifraga rotundifolia L. Scandix pecten-veneris L. subsp. pecten-veneris Scilla amoena L. Scilla luciliae (Boiss.) Speta Scilla sibirica Haw. Scirpus pendulus Mhlenb. Scleranthus annuus L. Scleroblitum atriplicinum (F. Mueller) Ulbrich Sclerochloa dura (L.) P. B. Fam Ros Ros Ros Ros Ros Ros Com Com Poly Poly Poly Poly Poly Poly Poly Poly Poly Poly Poly Poly Poly Poly Poly Rut Car Car Alis Sal Sal Chen Lam Lam Lam Lam Lam Lam Lam Cap Ros Ros Car Car Lam Sax Sax Sax Sax Sax Sax Api Hya Hya Hya Cyp Car Chen Gra Stat nat cas nat nat cas nat nat inv cas inv cas cas cas cas cas inv cas cas nat cas nat inv nat cas nat* nat* cas cas nat cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas nat* nat cas cas nat* cas cas cas nat nat cas cas nat* cas cas nat cas nat* cas nat* Res neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar ar neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar neo neo neo arP neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar neo neo neo neo arN neo ar

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

1st

Landuse NSH H S H SH S H NSH SH SH H SH SH H SH SH S H H H NSH NSH H NSH S SH N N N H SH H SH H H H H SH NSH H NSH NSH H H H NSH N N S H H SH H NSH H H

Landscape TM TM TM TM TM T TM TM T T M T TM M T T T M M T T T M TM T T M T T M TM TM TM M TM M TM T TM TM T TM TM T T T T T T T T T T T M T

1962 1873 1859 1819 1965 1981 1965 1965 1981 1961 1980 1861 1984 1818 1943 1874

2001

1880 1934 1809 1966 1965 1908 1840 1946 1906

1955 1850 1819 1956 1809 1867

1963

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

173
LH s s s s s pe abp pe pe pe pe pe pe a pe pe pe a pe pe pe pe pe ss a a pe t s a ss a b pe pe a pe a pe pe pe pe pe ab pe ab pe pe pe pe a pe pe pe pe a a a Source F F F F F F, Holub & Palek 1981 K K, Francrkov 2001 F F, Hendrych 2001 F F, Kubt 1985 F, Jehlk & Kopeck 1967 F F, Kubt 1985 F, Kubnov & Krahulec 1997, 1999 F, Kubt 1985 F F, Jehlk 1998 F, Kubt 1985 F F F, Hejn 1949, Hejn et al. 1973, Jehlk 1998 F F F K F F F F F F F, tpnkov 1999 F F F F F, Holub 1978b F F, Domin 1924, Michal 1949 F F F K, Prochzka et al. 1983 F F F F F, Chrtek et al. 1968, Phoda 2001 K K K Dostl 1989 F F K, Chrtek & kov 1990

Syntaxa

Abund LocNo Intr s r s s s s sc c r la se e r e r la e e sc r e la r r e e e s r r r e r se r e r sc r e r sc r r r sc s e e r r r sc se c e r 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 5 4 5 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 3 1 3 5 3 3 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 4 1 2 5 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 3 3 1 5 1 5 d d d a d d d d a d a a a a a a a a ad a d a a d a a d d d a d a d a d a d a a d d d d d d d d a d a d d d a a a a

Origin AMN AS E E E AF AS AMN AMN E AS AU E AS E AS AF E AMS E AS E AS AF E AS AMN E E E AMN E AS AS E AS AMN E AS E AS AF AMS E E AS E AS E AS AS E E AS E AS E E E E E E AS E AS AF E AS E AS AMN E AS AU E AS

PR

Ae Sf St Ar Ra Ae Pe PT CE Ad

Ar Al DM PT Ar Ae Ae Al Ar PT Pe

Al DM

DM Ar PF CA Si Al DM Gs Fv Th Th MP Ah Sg Ph St

Al Ae Fv Br CA DM

DM CA PF Ar Si

DS

Cl Ar Ar Ah Sn Ab Co Sr PS SO MP

174
Taxon Scopolia carniolica Jacq. Scorpiurus muricatus L. Scrophularia canina L. Scrophularia chrysantha Jaub. et Spach Scutellaria altissima L. Secale cereale L. Sedum aizoon L. Sedum annuum L. Sedum anopetalum DC. Sedum hispanicum L. Sedum hybridum L. Sedum pallidum var. bithynicum (Boiss.) Chamberlain Sedum rupestre subsp. erectum tHart Sedum sarmentosum Bunge Sedum spurium M. Bieb. Sedum stoloniferum S. Gmelin Sempervivum tectorum L. Senecio inaequidens DC. Senecio rupestris W. et K. Senecio vernalis W. et K. Senecio vulgaris L. Setaria adhaerens (Forska l) Chiovenda Setaria faberi Herrmann Setaria gussonei Kergulen Setaria italica (L.) P. B. subsp. italica Setaria italica subsp. moharia (Alef.) Krnicke Setaria pumila (Poiret) R. et Sch. Setaria verticillata (L.) P. B. Setaria viridis subsp. pycnocoma (Steud.) Tzvelev Setaria viridis (L.) P. B. subsp. viridis Sherardia arvensis L. Schismus barbatus (L.) Thell. Schkuhria pinnata (Lam.) O. Kuntze Sicyos angulata L. Sida hermaphrodita (L.) Rusby Sida rhombifolia L. subsp. rhombifolia Sida spinosa L. Silene armeria L. Silene cretica subsp. annulata (Thore) Hayek Silene dichotoma Ehrh. Silene gallica L. Silene hampeana Meusel et Werner Silene latifolia subsp. alba (Miller) Greuter et Burdet Silene noctiflora L. Silene grecescui Gusul. Silene pendula L. Silene viridiflora L. Silphium perfoliatum L. Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertner Sinapis arvensis L. Sisymbrium altissimum L. Sisymbrium austriacum Jacq. subsp. austriacum Sisymbrium irio L. Sisymbrium loeselii L. Sisymbrium officinale (L.) Scop. Sisymbrium orientale subsp. macroloma (Pomel) Dvok Fam Sol Fab Scr Scr Lam Gra Cra Cra Cra Cra Cra Cra Cra Cra Cra Cra Cra Com Com Com Com Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Gra Rub Gra Com Cuc Mal Mal Mal Car Car Car Car Car Car Car Car Car Car Com Com Bra Bra Bra Bra Bra Bra Bra Stat nat cas cas cas nat cas cas cas nat inv nat cas nat cas nat cas nat cas cas nat nat* cas nat nat* cas cas nat* nat* cas nat* nat* cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas nat cas nat nat* nat cas cas cas# cas cas nat* nat cas cas inv nat cas Res neo neo neo neo neo arB neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar neo neo ar ar ar arN arM neo arN ar neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo ar ar arN arI neo neo neo neo neo arN neo neo neo neo arN neo

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

1st 1866 1961 1855 1901 1880

Landuse NSH H H SH SH H SH SH S SH SH H H SH NS SH H H S H H H H H H H H H H H H H H SH H H H H H SH H NS SH H H H NS N H H SH NSH H H H H

Landscape T M M T T TM T T T TM T TM TM TM T TM T M T TM TM M M TM TM TM TM TM M TM T M T TM TM M M TM T TM T T TM T TM TM T T M TM TM T TM TM TM T

2001

1879 2001 1819 1997 1879 1872

1961

1961 1950 1880 1958 1979 1972 1850 1941 1841

1972 1896 1971 1885 1872 1815 1858 1851 1819 1958

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

175
LH Source F F F F, Chrtek J. & Skodopolov 1996 F K F F F, Holub 1972 F F F F F F K, Mandk & Bmov 2001 K K K K K, Jehlk 1971a, 1998 K K K K K K K F K, Dvok & Khn 1966 K, Chrtek 1981 F F F F F F, ourkov 1978 F F F F F F, Smejkal 1973 F F, Smejkal 1973 K K F F F F, Dvok 1982 F F F

Syntaxa TA Ae

Abund LocNo Intr r r e e sc r r s r sc r s sc r la r r r e la c r sc r r r c la r sc sc se r r r r r r e sc r sc c c e r se r r c c e r c c e 1 1 1 1 3 5 2 1 1 4 2 1 3 1 4 1 3 1 2 5 5 1 3 2 3 3 5 5 1 5 5 1 1 3 1 2 2 3 1 4 3 4 5 5 1 1 1 2 3 5 5 1 2 5 5 2 d a a d d d d d d d d d d d d d d a a a a a a a d d a a a a a a a d d a a ad a a a a a a a d d d d ad a a a a a a

Origin E E AS AF E AS AF E AS E AS

GA Si

MP Ab Cm Cm Ab Cm AS Ab CA Ab Al Si Ah Sh VE Si PS Er Cl PS Si Si PS Si PS Er Cl PS Er PS Er DM Sc AS Si Sh Sh Cl Ah

GA Al BS

DM VT Ar Ah Ae IS CA DM Oa PR Bd Al VT Cl VT Sh

Cr Si Oa VE SO PS Si Si Sr Er Si Si Si Mn

pe a pe b pe pe a AS pe E ab E AS pe E AS pe AS pe E AS pe E pe AS pe AS pe AS pe E pe AF pe E a E AS a E AS a AS AF AMC AMS a AS a a a a E AS a E a E AS a E AS a E AS AF a E a AMC AMS a AMN a AMN pe AMN AMC AMS ss AS AF AMN AMC AMS pe ss E a E a E AS ab E ab ? E AS AF pe a E AS ab ? E a E pe AMN pe E a E AS AF a E AS a E b pe E AS a E AS AF a E AS AF a E a

176
Taxon Sisymbrium polymorphum (Murray) Roth Sisymbrium strictissimum L. Sisymbrium volgense M. Bieb ex E. Foum Sisyrinchium angustifolium Mill. Sium sisarum L. Smyrnium perfoliatum L. Solanum americanum Mill. Solanum carolinense L. Solanum cornutum L. Solanum decipiens Opiz Solanum linneanum Hepper et Jaeger Solanum lycopersicum L. Solanum melongena L. Solanum nigrum L. Solanum physalifolium Rusby Solanum pseudocapsicum L. Solanum pyracanthos Lam. Solanum scabrum Mill. Solanum sisymbriifolium Lam. Solanum triflorum Nutt. Solanum tuberosum L. Solanum villosum Mill. Solidago canadensis L. Solidago gigantea Aiton Solidago graminifolia (L.) Salisb. Sonchus arvensis L. subsp. arvensis Sonchus asper (L.) Hill Sonchus oleraceus L. Sorbaria sorbifolia (L.) A. Braun Sorbus domestica L. Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. Sorghum sudanense (Piper) Stapf Spergula arvensis L. subsp. arvensis Spergula arvensis L. subsp. arvensis S. sativa Spergula arvensis subsp. linicola (Boreau) Janchen Spergula arvensis subsp. maxima (Weihe) O. Schwarz Spergula arvensis subsp. sativa (Boenn.) elak. Spinacia oleracea L. Spiraea alba Duroi Spiraea billardii Dippel Spiraea chamaedryfolia L. Spiraea crenata L. Spiraea douglasii Hooker Spiraea macrothyrsa Dippel Sporobolus elongatus (Lam.) R. Br. Stachys affinis Bunge Stachys annua (L.) L. Stachys arvensis (L.) L. Stachys byzantina C. Koch Stellaria pallida (Dumort.) Murb. Symphoricarpos albus (L.) Blake Symphoricarpos orbiculatus Moench Symphytum asperum Lepechin Symphytum upplandicum Nyman Syringa vulgaris L. Tagetes erecta L. Fam Bra Bra Bra Iri Api Api Sol Sol Sol Sol Sol Sol Sol Sol Sol Sol Sol Sol Sol Sol Sol Sol Com Com Com Com Com Com Ros Ros Gra Gra Gra Car Car Car Car Car Chen Ros Ros Ros Ros Ros Ros Gra Lam Lam Lam Lam Car Cap Cap Bor Bor Ole Com Stat cas nat nat nat cas nat cas cas cas nat cas cas cas nat* cas cas# cas cas cas cas cas cas inv inv cas nat* nat nat* nat# cas cas cas cas nat* cas cas cas nat cas cas cas cas nat cas# cas# cas cas nat* nat cas nat* inv cas# cas nat inv cas Res neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo arN neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo arM arM ar neo neo neo neo neo arN ar ar ar arB arM neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo arM arN neo ar neo neo neo neo neo neo

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

1st 1959 1819 1960 1863 1886 1966 1985 1899 1819 1880

Landuse H NSH H S S NSH H H H H H SH H H H H H H H H H H NSH NSH H SH H H NS NS H H H H H H H H H H H NSH N SH H H H H H NS NSH H H SH NSH H

Landscape M T TM T T TM M M TM TM TM TM TM TM M TM M TM TM M TM M TM TM TM TM TM TM T T M M M T T T T T TM T TM T T T M T T T TM TM TM TM TM T T TM

1975 1940 1975 1935 1914 1850 1838 1851

1940

1927

1900 1889 1940 1961 1924

1941 1908 1809

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

177
LH Source F, Dvok 1981 F F, Jehlk 1971b, 1981, 1998, Hejn et al. 1973 K, Pospil 1952, Kotlaba 1952 K F, Ksa et al. 1968, Mller 1998 F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F K K K K K K F F K K, Hejn et al. 1973, Jehlk 1998 K F F F F F F F F F F F F Dvok & Khn 1966 K, Novk 1924, Chrtek 1994 F F F F F F F, Smejkal 1978 F F K

Syntaxa Al GA Bd BS TA Al DM Si Ar Ap GA CR Ai BS

Abund LocNo Intr e sc r r s r r e r sc s la r c r r e r r e c s c c r c c c r r r r r c r e e sc r r r r s r r se e r e r sc sc r r r sc r 1 4 3 3 1 2 1 1 1 4 1 5 1 5 1 1 1 1 2 2 5 1 5 5 1 5 5 5 2 3 2 1 1 5 2 1 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 5 2 2 5 5 3 2 4 5 2 a ad a d a ad a a a a a d d a a d d d ad a d a d d d a a a d d d a a a a ad ad ad d d d d d d d a d a a d a d d d ad d d

Origin E AS E E AMN E E AS AMN AMS AMN AMN E AF AMC AMS AS AF E AMS AMS AF AF AMS AMN AMS E AS AF AMN AMN AMN E E E AS E AS AF AF E AS AF E AS

Si VE Al Bi Cb Si VE Si

Si VE Ar DM Al Ae BS SS St Ar Ae Sf BS CR Si Pa VE VE Si VE Si Cr Bd

SO PS Ah Ah Ah SO PS Ah Si

Cl VE Si Ah SO Ab MP BS BS Cr Ae Ae Ar Ap Ae Pa Bd BS

pe pe pe pe pe b a pe a pe a a ss s a a pe a a ss s pe a a pe a pe pe a pe pe pe pe a a s t a pe a a a E AS a E AS a E AS a AS a AMN s s E AS s E AS s AMN s s AS AF AMC AMS pe AS pe E AS a E AS AF a AS pe E a AMN s AMN s AS pe pe E st AMC a

178
Taxon Tagetes patula L. Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Schultz-Bip. Tanacetum vulgare L. Telekia speciosa (Schreb.) Baumg. Tetragonia tetragonoides (Pallas) O. Kuntze Teucrium marum L. Teucrium polium L. Teucrium scorodonia L. Thladiantha dubia Bunge Thlaspi arvense L. Thlaspi kovatsii Heuff. Thymus drucei Ronniger Thymus vulgaris L. Tilia tomentosa Moench Torilis arvensis (Hudson) Link subsp. arvensis Torilis nodosa (L.) Gaertn. Tragopogon dubius Scop. Tragopogon mirabilis Rouy Tragopogon porrifolius L. Tragus racemosus (L.) All. Tribulus terrestris L. Trifolium alexandrinum L. Trifolium angulatum W. et K. Trifolium angustifolium M. Bieb. Trifolium glomeratum L. Trifolium hybridum L. subsp. hybridum Trifolium incarnatum L. subsp. incarnatum Trifolium lappaceum L. Trifolium ornithopodioides L. Trifolium pallidum W. et K. Trifolium pannonicum Jacq. Trifolium pratense subsp. americanum (C. O. Harz) Sojk Trifolium pratense subsp. sativum (Schreber) Schbl. et Mart. Trifolium resupinatum L. Trifolium squamosum L. Trifolium subterraneum L. Trifolium tomentosum L. Trigonella caerulea (L.) Ser. Trigonella foenum-graceum L. Tripleurospermum inodorum (L.) Schultze Triticum aestivum L. Triticum dicoccon Schrank Triticum polonicum L. Triticum turgidum L. Tropaeolum majus L. Tulipa gesnerana L. Tulipa sylvestris L. Turgenia latifolia (L.) Hoffm. Ulex europaeus L. Urtica dodartii L. Urtica pilulifera L. Urtica urens L. Vaccaria hispanica subsp. grandiflora (Ser.) Holub Valerianella dentata (L.) Pollich subsp. dentata Valerianella dentata subsp. eriosperma (Wallr.) Holub Valerianella rimosa Bast. Vallisneria spiralis L. Fam Com Com Com Com Aiz Lam Lam Lam Cuc Bra Bra Lam Lam Til Api Api Com Com Com Gra Zyg Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Com Gra Gra Gra Gra Tro Lil Lil Api Fab Urt Urt Urt Car Val Val Val Hydc Stat cas nat inv inv cas cas cas nat cas nat* cas cas cas cas nat* cas nat cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas nat* cas cas cas cas nat cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas inv cas cas cas cas cas cas cas nat* cas# cas cas nat* nat* nat* nat* nat* cas Res neo ar ar neo neo neo neo neo neo arN neo neo neo neo ar neo ar neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo neo arM ar ar neo neo neo neo neo ar neo neo neo arN arP arN ar ar neo

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

1st

Landuse H H SH SH H H H SH SH H H NS SH H H H SH H H H H H N H H SH SH H H H NS SH H H H H H H H H H H H H H SH NSH H S H H H H H H H N

Landscape TM T TM T TM TM TM T TM TM M T TM M T T TM TM TM TM M M T T M TM T M M M T T TM TM M M M T T TM TM T T T TM TM T T T TM TM T T T T T T

1918 1960 1806 1939

1974 2001

1872

1960 1976 1923 1961 1819 1870 1916 1960 1930 1919 1880 1853 1930 1962 1961 1874 1889

1867 1880 1872

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

179
LH a pe pe pe a s s pe ss pe ab pe ss s ss t a a a a pe a a a a a a a b pe ab a a ab pe pe pe a a a a a a a a a a a a pe pe a s pe a a a a a a pe Source K K K K F F F F, Kubt 1993 F F F F, p 1982 F F F F K K K K F F F F F F F F F F F, Hendrych 1968 F F F F F F F F K K K K K F K K F F F F F F F, Holub 1978c F F K

Syntaxa Si Cm Al Si Al CA Ar Ae Ai IS

Abund LocNo Intr r sc c sc r r e r r c s r r r r e c r r r r e e se e c sc e e e r e sc r e r e sc sc c sc r r r r sc r e r r r c e sc r r e 3 5 5 4 1 1 1 3 3 5 1 1 2 1 3 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 1 2 5 3 1 2 1 3 3 5 5 1 1 1 3 4 3 3 1 1 2 5 4 5 4 4 1 d d a d d d a ad d a a d d d a a a a d a a ad a a a d ad a a a ad d d ad a a a d d a d a a a d d d a d d d a a a a a d

Origin AMC E AS E E AMS AS AU E E AS AF E AS E AS E E E E E AS E E E E E AS E E E AS E AS E AS E E AS E E AS E

GQ LF CE Si Ae VE SO Ah

Oa Al DM Cl DM Sc

Sr Er MP

Ap C Ar Pa Pa Ar

Pa Ar

Si DM Si SO PS

AS E AS E AS AF E AS E E AS E

E AMS E E AS AF E E E E AS E E AS AF E E AF AS

Si VE Ar Ae Cr Ai TA Cl

Mn Cb Cl Sh Cl Cl Sh Fv Cl Sh

180
Taxon Verbascum niveum subsp. visianinum (Reichenb.) Murb. Verbena bonariensis L. Verbena chamaedryfolia Juss. Verbena hybrida hort. Verbena officinalis L. Verbena rigida Sprengel Veronica acinifolia L. Veronica agrestis L. Veronica arvensis L. Veronica filiformis Sm. Veronica hederifolia L. Veronica opaca Fries Veronica peregrina L. subsp. peregrina Veronica persica Poiret Veronica polita Fries Veronica triloba (Opiz) Wiesb. Veronica triphyllos L. Vicia angustifolia L. Vicia articulata Hornem. Vicia bithynica (L.) L. Vicia cordata Hoppe Vicia ervilia (L.) Willd. Vicia faba L. Vicia grandiflora Scop. subsp. grandiflora Vicia hirsuta (L.) S. F. Gray Vicia lutea L. Vicia melanops Sibth. et Sm. Vicia narbonensis L. Vicia onobrychioides L. Vicia pannonica Crantz subsp. pannonica Vicia pannonica subsp. striata (M. Bieb.) Nyman Vicia poechhackeri J. Murr Vicia sativa L. Vicia villosa subsp. varia (Host) Corb. Vicia villosa Roth subsp. villosa Viola canadensis var. rugulosa (Greene) Hitchc. Viola cornuta L. Viola haynaldii Wiesb. Viola hungarica Degen et Sabr. Viola kerneri Wiesb. Viola obliqua Hill. Viola odorata L. Viola pluricaulis Borbs Viola poelliana Murr. Viola porphyrea Uechtr. Viola scabra F. Braun Viola sourekii Prochzka Viola suavis M. Bieb. Viola tricolor L. subsp. curtisii (E. Forster) Syme Viola tricolor L. subsp. tricolor Viola vindobonensis Wiesb. Viola wittrockiana Gams Virga strigosa (R. et Sch.) Holub Vitis riparia Michx Vitis vinifera L. subsp. vinifera Vulpia bromoides (L.) S. F. Gray Fam Scr Ver Ver Ver Ver Ver Scr Scr Scr Scr Scr Scr Scr Scr Scr Scr Scr Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Fab Vio Vio Vio Vio Vio Vio Vio Vio Vio Vio Vio Vio Vio Vio Vio Vio Vio Dip Vit Vit Gra Stat cas cas cas cas nat* cas cas nat* nat* inv inv nat* cas inv nat* nat* nat* nat* cas cas nat* cas cas nat* nat cas cas cas cas nat nat cas nat* nat* nat* cas# cas nat nat cas cas inv cas nat nat inv cas nat cas nat* cas cas inv cas cas nat Res neo neo neo neo arN neo neo ar ar neo arN ar neo neo arM ar ar ar neo neo ar neo neo neo arN neo neo neo neo ar neo neo ar ar arI neo neo neo arM neo neo arM arM arM arM arM neo neo neo ar neo neo neo neo arM ar

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

1st 1914 1983 1853

Landuse SH H H H H H H NSH NSH SH NSH H NSH H H H H SH H H H H H SH SH NSH SH H H SH SH SH SH NSH NSH H NS NS NS N NS NSH S NS NSH NSH S NSH N SH SH H H SH SH SH

Landscape TM M M T T M TM T TM TM TM T T TM TM T T TM TM TM TM T TM T TM T T TM TM T T T TM T TM TM T T T T T TM T T T TM T TM T T TM TM TM TM TM T

1967 1908

1938

1809 1809

1874 1949 1874 1877

1900 1980

1948 1959 1886 1904 1895

1953

1864 1964

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

181
LH b pe ss ss a pe a pe a a a pe a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a pe a a a a a ab pe pe pe pe pe pe pe pe pe pe pe ? pe pe a pe ab b s t ab Source F F F F F F F, Smejkal 1970 F F F, Jehlk 1961, 1998, Jehlk & Slavk 1967, Hejn et al. 1973, Jehlk 1998 F F F, Peniatekov & Ferkov 1993 F F F F F F F, Sutor 1976 K F F F F F, Skivnek 1949 F F F, Saul 1983 F F F F F F F, Kirschner & tpnek 1984 F, Skalick 1973 F F F F, Kirschner & tpnek 1984 F F F F F F F F F F F F, Lhotsk 1968b F F K

Syntaxa

Abund LocNo Intr e e e r sc se r r c sc c r r c c r sc c sc e r r r sc c r e r e sc r r c c c se r r r e se c e r sc sc r r r sc r sc la r r r 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 5 5 4 5 4 2 5 5 4 5 5 4 1 3 2 3 4 5 2 1 2 1 4 3 1 5 5 5 1 2 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 4 5 1 3 1 5 1 4 4 1 4 2 a ad d d a d a a a d a a a a a a a a d a a d d a a a a ad a ad a a ad ad ad d d a a a d d a a a a a d a a a d d d d a

Origin E AMS AMS E AS AF AMS E E AF E AS E AS E AS AF E AMN AMC AMS AS E E E E AS AF E AS AF E AS E AS E AS AS AF E AS E AS E AS AF E E AS E E E AS AF E AS AF E E AS AMN E

Al Pa MP Ah Sh VE Ab AS Ab Ap Ar Cy Pa Ae Ah Sh Si BS BR CR Cr VE Bi Es Sg VE Sh Ah Si VT VE Cl Mn Cl Ah Ab Sh Cl PS Ab Fv KP AS DM

Cl Sh Ah Ar CA Tm Ah KP PF Ab Cl Fv Br Ar

Ar Ps Fv Br Cl Fv Br Ar KP Cl Sh Ah Pa PS VT PF DM Cl Sh Ar Ah Sh Ar CA Vc PT Ar Fv Fv Br Bd

GA BS CR Cr Ai Ae

AMN E AS AF

Bd Cr Br GA BS Cr BR Bd GA TA PT GA BS CR Ae Co SO Si Ar Bd TA BS GA Si Al Ae GA BS CA PR Bd Th

E AS E E

E AS AMN E AS E

182
Taxon Vulpia ciliata Dum. Vulpia ligustica (All.) Link Vulpia myuros (L.) C. C. Gmelin Waldsteinia geoides Willd. Waldsteinia trifolia Rochel ex Koch Xanthium albinum (Widd.) H. Scholz Xanthium ripicola Holub Xanthium spinosum L. Xanthium strumarium L. Xanthophthalmum coronarium (L.) Trehane Xanthophthalmum segetum (L.) Schultz-Bip. Zea mays L. Zelkova serrata (Thunb.) Mak. Zinnia elegans Jacq. Fam Gra Gra Gra Ros Ros Com Com Com Com Com Com Gra Ulm Com Stat cas cas nat cas nat nat cas nat* nat* cas cas cas cas cas Res neo neo ar neo neo neo neo neo arB neo neo neo neo neo

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

1st

Landuse H H SH S S S H H H H H H N H

Landscape M M T T T T TM T TM TM T M TM TM

1872 1872 1879 1872 1973

New additions to the alien flora of the Czech Republic: Agrostis scabra. Tebo region: sand pit near the village of Halmky in the southern part of the basin (2001, V. Horvthov M. tech, pers. com.). Alhagi pseudalhagi. Raspenava, distr. Liberec: 1 specimen in the garden of the house no. 16, SW from the Pekelsk vrch hill (1963, V. Jehlk PRA). Wool casual, native from E Europe to Middle Asia. Allium atropurpureum W. et K. was found escaped from cultivation in Marovice, South Moravia (BRNM Krahulec, pers. com.). Bromus hordeaceus subsp. pseudothominii. Hrdoovice and Nov Paka, distr. Jin: rarely between tracks at railway stations in both settlements; Praha-Holeovice: W part of the Vltava river port (all localities 1971, V. Jehlk PRA). Carduus tenuiflorus. Liberec: 1 specimen found on the wool-waste deposits of Textilana spinning mill (1967, V. Jehlk PRA). Taxonomic identity of this species requires further study (see Clement & Foster 1994: 300). Centaurea gerstlaueri. Jasenn, distr. Semily: rarely on railway station; Krsn Lpa: rarely on the main railway station; Tanvald, rarely at the perifery of the main railway station (all localities 1966, V. Jehlk PRA). Centaurea nigra phrygia. Jasenn, distr. Semily: rarely at railway station (1966, V. Jehlk PRA). Cerastium maureri. Occurence of the cross between the neophyte C. tomentosum and native C. arvense subsp. arvense was suspected but not confirmed by Smejkal in Hejn & Slavk (1992). In fact, it has been overlooked as it is rather common around cabins and cottages, in gardens and cemeteries. Selected localities: Praha 8, Trojsk street: at a wall base (2001, P. Pyek & B. Mandk); ruderal habitats in towns, e.g. Otradovice near Lys nad Labem, Karltejn, esk Krumlov, Horn Slavkov, Dvr Krlov nad Labem (J. Sdlo). Gilia capitata. atec, on the bank of Ohe river along the road to Podboany (1982, J. Houda PRA). The species is native to North America where it grows from Alaska to California, Arizona, Utah, Idaho (Kartesz & Meacham 1999). Since planting is not mentioned in Czech garden literature, it is uncertain whether it was introduced accidentally or escaped from cultivation. Helianthus strumosus. Reported from two localities (Kutn hora, Bezina). Seldom planted in gardens. Native to E North America (J. Kirschner & O. da, pers. com.). Hieracium pannosum. It grows on the Kuntick hora hill near Pardubice (J. Chrtek jun., pers. comm.); its occurence is associated with intentional introductions of many species which were planted at the locality in the 1930s by a natural-historical society from Pardubice (F. Prochzka, pers. com.). Hordeum leporinum. Liberec: several plants on a waste deposit near the Textilana spinning mill (1967, V. Jehlk PRA). Native to Mediterranean, including Atlantic Islands. Oenothera coronifera. Zliv, distr. esk Budjovice: cca 30 plants grew in a mixed stand with O. issleri at a railway station (2001, Mihulka et al. in prep.). Papaver atlanticum subsp. mesatlanticum. Suice, distr. Klatovy: yard of a school canteen (house no. 87/III); hospital: several plants near the entrance gate and by the nutrition department. It formerly occurred on several other localities in the town of Klatovy but disappeared due to building activities (2001, M. Krl). The species originates from N Africa (Morocco) and is rarely planted in the Czech Republic. Parietaria pennsylvanica. Praha 5, Na eelice street; about 30 plants were first observed in 2000 (J. Sdlo PRA, in prep.). The species is native to N America, and might have been introduced into Czech Republic from Berlin where it is rather common. Polypogon fugax. esk Skalice II Mal Skalice: one specimen on the yard of the Tiba spinning mill on the pa river bank (1964, V. Jehlk PRA). Wool or cotton casual native to Mediterranean, including Atlantic Islands. Rodgersia aesculifolia. Pbram: wetland patch with Menyathes trifoliata in a park near a football stadium (2001, P. Pyek & J. Pykov PRA). A single clone ca. 0.9 m in diameter was found; the character of the locality indicates accidental introduction. Native to China. Sedum pallidum var. bithynicum. Beroun: it was found in 2001 at the Berounka

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

183
Source K K K F F K K K K, Opravil 1963 K K K K K

Syntaxa

Abund LocNo Intr r r sc s s la r r la r r sc s r 2 2 4 1 1 4 1 2 3 2 2 4 1 2 a a a a a a a a a d ad d d d

Origin E E E E E AMN E AMS E AS E E AMC AS AMC

LH a a ab pe pe a a a a a a a t a

Th

PS Pa Oa Mn Oa Mn Si PS Er Ah Sn Si

river bank during the floristic summer school organized by the Czech Botanical Society (det. M. Krl). It is rarely planted (e.g. cemetery in Klatovy) and originates from SE Europe and SW Asia. Sedum stoloniferum. Klatovy: two localities near the Vtrovna quarry where the plants were probably introduced from the nearby cemetery (2001, M. Krl, pers. com.). Native to Caucasus. Species treated in the Flora of the Czech Republic or in Kubt et al. (2002) but not reported as escaping from cultivation: Acer ginnala. Liberec: escaped and growing in a park hedgerow (2001, J. Sdlo). Acer monspessulanum. Praha: Vinohrady hospital, young trees about 1 m tall were found growing in the park where adult trees are planted (2001, J. Sdlo). Aesculus carnea. Semily: two-year old sapling was found at the perifery of railway station (1964, V. Jehlk PRA). Astilbe arendsii. Jilemnice, distr. Semily: ca 5 km NW of the town, near the Doln Sytov village, ca 0.2 km from the bridge upstream across the Jizera river (1999, B. Mandk PRA). A single clone ca 1 m2 in size was found; it corresponds to the cultivar grown during WWI (M. Opatrn, pers. com.). Beta vulgaris group Vulgaris. Escapes by seed on field margins, along roads and paths, on compost piles, rubbish tips and in the vicinity of sugar refineries. Beta vulgaris group Cicla. Escapes by seed, usually in garden composts, and occasionally persists for few years (Praha-Satalice, J. Sdlo). Buddleja davidii. Praha 8: numerous population of shrubs of various ages (up to several years) originated from seed was found between the tram stops Trojsk and Nad Trojou (2001, J. Pykov & P. Pyek). Campanula speciosa. Pec pod Snkou (J. Sdlo). A garden escape found in the vicinity of mountain chalets and gardens; the localities represent clonally spreading cultivation relics. Castanea sativa. Praha-Petn; several localities in the esk Stedoho hills (2000, J. Sdlo) and near Litoice in the elezn hory Mts (B. Mandk). Celtis occidentalis. Praha: Vinohrady hospital (2001, J. Sdlo PRA). The species was reported in the Flora of the Czech Republic as very rarely escaping from cultivation, albeit without a concrete locality (an old record by Dostl 1954 from the vicinity of the town of Velvary is erroneous). The record reported here is the first evidence of cultivation escape and the mention in Kubt et al. (2002) is based on the same locality. Chamaecyparis lawsoniana. National park Czech-Saxonian Switzerlan (N Bohemia): self-seeding in a sandstone valley NE of the Kolit hill (P. Bauer, pers. com.). Chaenomeles japonica. It grows on Kuntick hora hill near Pardubice as a cultivation relic planted in the 1930s by a natural-historical society from the town of Pardubice; it has spread since then and persists (F. Prochzka, pers. com.). Chrysanthemum indicum. Garden escape at rubbish tips in cemeteries and allotments. Corydalis alba subsp. alba. Jindichv Hradec (ca. 1995, J. Kolbek & J. Sdlo), Ronov nad Doubravou (ca 1998, J. Sdlo). Reported neither by the Flora of the Czech Republic nor by Kubt et al. (2002), only by Dostl (1989). It is seldom planted as a garden ornamental and very rarely escapes from cultivation. Corylus colurna. Praha-Petn: young shrubs escaped from cultivation in the park (2001, J. Sdlo). Cotoneaster bullatus. Praha-Libe: along tracks at the railway station in a depression between two railway embankments (2001, Z. Kaplan PRA). Native to North America (British Columbia). Cotoneaster horizontalis. Kuntick hora hill near Pardubice. The species grows there as a cultivation relic planted in the 1930s by a natural-historical society from the town of Pardubice; it has spread since then and persists (F. Prochzka, pers. com.). Praha-Radotn: as a cultivation relic on a rock in the area of cement works; Brno-ekovice: itn street, escaped from cultivation,

184

Preslia 74: 97186, 2002

between a stone wall base and asphalt pavement (2001, V. ehoek). Crataegus flabellata. Javornk (distr. Jesenk): the Jnsk vrch hill ca. 1 km SW of the town, shrubs along a path between fields (1993, J. Vicherek); Praha 5-ern vrch: several young shrubs in open spaces and among shrub plantations (2001, J. Sdlo). Crataegus persimilis. Lednice, distr. Beclav: escaping from cultivation in the chateau park (M. Pejchal, pers. com.). Crocus flavus. Morvka, distr. Frdek-Mstek: understory of a beech woodland at the bank of the Morvka river (1999, P. Pyek & B. Mandk PRA, det. J. Holub). Reported by Dostl (1989) as intentionally planted in the wild near Praha-Hluboepy. Deutzia scabra. Liberec: escaped by seed in open spaces and in the streets, among cobble stones (2001, J. Sdlo). Doronicum orientale. Naturalized as a cultivation relic in the Terino dol valley near Nov Hrady, S Bohemia; it has been known from there since 1884 (elakovsk 1885), and still grows there (M. tech, pers. com.). Doronicum columnae. Occasionally planted in the wild and surviving as a cultivation relic, e.g. district of Brno: deciduous forest on the Mni hora hill E of the Knniky village (1995, M. Hladkov); allotments in Slabice near the Vltava river (M. tech, pers. com.) Forsythia suspensa. Praha-Libe, slope with scrub above the Rokytka brook; Vino: in the village. In both localities, the species spreads by rooting of shoots (2001, J. Sdlo). Fraxinus ornus. Praha-Troja: south-oriented slopes above the Trojsk street and elsewhere around (approximately since the 1950s); Bohemian Karst: Konprusy, Beroun (J. Sdlo). In the past, several specimens were reported by elakovsk (1872) growing on the Niklasberg (Mikulsk kopec) hill near esk Krumlov but it was not possible to determine whether or not these were planted and persisted as cultivation relics. Although the species should be considered as naturalized, neither the Flora of the Czech Republic nor Kubt et al. (2002) mention escaping from cultivation. Hippopha rhamnoides. First reported as garden escape from a hill near Podhradice NE of Blina (Polvka 1901). Recently, a plant established from a discarded root has been persisting since ca. 1995 in Praha-Jinonice, in a soil deposit near underground station (2000, J. Sdlo). Hosta plantaginea. Escapes occasionally from cultivation in gardens and parks. Iris pallida. Escapes occasionally from cultivation in gardens and parks (J. Holub, pers. com.). Juglans nigra. S Moravia: rather frequent in forest plantations at the confluence of the Morava and Dyje rivers, intensively escaping from cultivation in places, e.g. Ranpurk nature reserve (Vicherek et al. 2000); Lednice, distr. Beclav: rather easily escaping from cultivation in the chateau park and its surroundings (M. Pejchal, pers. com.). Lycium chinense. Nebanice, distr. Cheb: it grows as a clonally spreading cultivation relic around a poorly maintained church, and penetrates into surrounding vegetation (J. Sdlo). Miscanthus sinensis. Garden escape at fishpond barrier in Malenice near Volyn, and in ruderal grassland in Praha-Satalice (J. Sdlo). Paeonia officinalis. Srbsko, distr. Beroun: a plant established from rubbish deposited in the limestone quarry Na Chlumu has been persisting for ca. 20 years, and spreads slightly (J. Sdlo). Physalis pubescens. Zlat Koruna, distr. esk Krumlov: in the village (2001, M. Lep, in prep.). Platanus hispanica. Praha: Vinohrady hospital; Praha, Botisk street: an adult tree originated from seed was observed in 1990 and later cut down (J. Sdlo). Populus balsamifera. First reported as a cultivation escape by elakovsk (1880) along the road from esk Lpa to Nov Zmky and by Velenovsk from the region of Blatn. Recently, three specimens were found in Star Paka (distr. Jin) growing at the perifery of the railway station (1964, V. Jehlk PRA). Neither the Flora of the Czech Republic nor Kubt et al. (2002) mention escape from cultivation. Potentilla fruticosa. Kuntick hora hill near Pardubice. The species grows as a cultivation relic planted in the 1930s by a natural-historical society from the town of Pardubice; it has spread since then and persists (F. Prochzka, pers. com.). Prunus laurocerasus. Praha-Spoilov, Prhonice: numerous self-seeded young plants around planted adults (2001, J. Sdlo). Prunus virginiana. Lednice, distr. Beclav: escaped from cultivation in the chateau park (M. Pejchal, pers. com.). Ricinus communis. Kozomn near Kralupy nad Vltavou: two flowering plants on a rubbish tip at the village perifery (1996, P. Pyek & B. Mandk). Salix sepulcralis. Praha-Radotn: a single shrub on a Vltava river alluvium (2001, J. Sdlo). Scopolia carniolica. It was reported as long persistent (18661880) from school garden in Valteice near esk Lpa (elakovsk 1881). At present, it grows in Praha-Divok rka, probably as a cultivation relic (J. Hadinec, pers. comm.). Recently, a small established population of ca. 10 plants was found in ampach, distr. Praha-zpad (2001, J. Sdlo PRA). Sedum annuum. Old records about escapes from cultivation (elakovsk 18671881, 19001904) are doubtful (Grulich in Hejn & Slavk 1992). Recently, it was found as a garden escape in the region of Kivoklt (J. Kolbek, pers. com.). Tilia tomentosa. Praha-Karlovo nmst square: several young trees from self-seeding, growing in a ruderal habitat by a house (2001, J. Sdlo). Tulipa gesnerana. Escapes from cultivation in gardens, waste places, rubbish tips and villages.

Pyek et al.: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic

185

Remarks on other species: Acorus calamus. Immigration time of this species requires further study as it probably arrived earlier than usually considered (R. Hendrych, in litt.). Allium tuberosum. The herbarium specimen collected by elakovsk in Praha-Chuchle 1866, and listed since then in several floras (Dostl 19481950, 1989) under the name Allium odorum L., belongs to this species (F. Krahulec, in prep.). Allim atroviolaceum. Errouneously reported from South Moravia, near the village of Sokolnice (Dostl 19481950, 1989). These plants belong to another taxon; however, herbarium specimen of A. atroviolaceum from Pouzdany, South Moravia, has been discovered recently (F. Krahulec, in prep.). Amelanchier lamarckii. First reported under the name A. canadensis as growing wild from the Terezino dol valley in the vicinity of Nov Hrady (Velenovsk 1877 in elakovsk 1881), also mentioned as garden escape by Polvka (19001904). However, A. canadensis is cultivated very rarely in Europe, only in few botanical gardens. The old records relate to A. lamarckii, grown for its fruits and medicinal use, with which it is often confused. The latter species easily escapes from cultivation in western Europe (M. Pejchal, pers. com.). Bromus pumpellianus inermis. This taxon was first reported as Bromopsis pumpelliana subsp. flexuosa, syn. Bromus pumpellianus (Krahulec & Jiit 1997) but further studies revealed that it is most probably a hybrid between B. pumpellianus and B. inermis (F. Krahulec, pers. com.). Bunias orientalis. The species is considered as a neophyte but the time of its immigration into Central Europe requires further study as it is listed by Lang (1994) as an archaeophyte having arrived in the Middle Ages. Carex muskingumensis. Not listed in Kubt et al. (2002). In 1947, two tussocks were collected on a rubbish tip in Brno-Pisrky; later, a more abundant source population was found in a semi-natural reed stand by a small pond (Grll 1952). Conygeron huelsenii. This hybrid was found in 1887 near Roov, distr. Louny, in a clearing by the road from Netluky to Teskonice, in the population of both parents (elakovsk 1888b). Cyperus eragrostis. A single plant appeared on an emergent bottom of the water reservoir in Jablonec nad Nisou (Petk 2002). Eichhornia crassipes. Osek (distr. Nymburk): ca. 10 plants growing in a water reservoir at the SE margin of the village (2000, J. Hadinec & P. Havlek). Also reported by Rydlo (1992) as planted in a pool near the village of Raice at Kivoklt region, C Bohemia, in 1991, and later by the same author (Rydlo 2001) from the section of Labe river between Mlnk and Hrobce, albeit without further details. Oenothera stricta. Reported from the Vltava river bank (Knaf 1825 PR Jehlk in Slavk 1997). Recently, a single plant was found growing as a weed on a garden bed in Husova 342, Vroutek, distr. Podboany (2001, A. Pyek & P. Pyek PRA). Polygonum aviculare agg. Pollen of this aggregate species was found in Mesolith (P. Pokorn, pers. com.), which qualifies it as a native species. We believe that this finding concerns P. arenastrum Bor. which is considered an apophyte (in the sense of Holub & Jirsek 1967) whereas P. aviculare s. str. is considered an archaeophyte, on the basis of its ecology and distribution outside the territory of the Czech Republic. Setaria faberi. Plants treated as S. macrocarpa Lucznik by some authors (e.g. Jehlk 1998) are included here within this taxon, according to Kubt et al. (2002). Veronica filiformis. The Caucasian species V. filiformis was described by Smith in 1791. Unfortunately, Besser used the same name for V. persica (syn. V. tournefortii, V. buxbaumii) in 1809, as did De Candolle in 1815. For this reason, Presl & Presl (1819) listed V. filiformis in their Flora echica but the record relates to V. persica. The same mistake was made by Pohl (1809) and Opiz (1823). elakovsk (18671881) obviously distinguished between the two species and avoided the confusion as can be inferred from the fact that he does not list V. filiformis for the Czech flora (Bohumil Slavk, pers. com.). The true V. filiformis was introduced as late as in 1938. Zelkova serrata. Erroneously reported as Z. carpinifolia in the Flora of the Czech Republic (Hrouda in Slavk 1988). Hundred and twenty specimens were planted on arable land in the arboretum near Ti grcie near Lednice in S Moravia. Thousands of saplings have escaped from browsing danger and grow in the surrounding vegetation; where they were first observed in 1973 (M. Pejchal, pers. com.).

186

Preslia 74: 97XX, 2002

Appendix 2. Structure of the database. See text for more details on characteristics concerning species invasiveness in the Czech Republic. The four main spheres of information are displayed in bold, database fields are printed in upper case. I. Species identity and taxonomic position: GENUS, SPECIES, SUBSPECIES, SYNONYMS, FAMILY, ORDER, SOURCE OF INFORMATION: floras, important detailed papers; LOCALITY: only in rare species. II. Invasiveness (features related to the species ecology and behaviour in the Czech Republic) INVASIVE STATUS (sensu Richardson et al. 2000): casual, naturalized, invasive, post-invasive, cultivation relict; RESIDENCE TIME (period of immigration): archaeophyte, neophyte. Recently found hybrid between two archaeophytes is also considered as an archaeophyte; despite of it being reported only recently, the species could have hybridized since the time of arrival of the later immigrant. Hybrid between archaeophyte and neophyte must be, following the same logic, considered a neophyte. YEAR OF INTRODUCTION: in deliberately introduced taxa (applicable namely for woody plants); YEAR OF THE FIRST RECORD in the wild; TYPE OF INVADED HABITAT: natural, seminatural, human-made (Chytr et al. 2001); TYPE OF INVADED LANDSCAPE: traditional agricultural landscape, industrial urban landscape (Hobsbawm 1991). LIST OF INVADED HABITATS: based on Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (1992); SOIL description; PHYTOSOCIOLOGICAL UNITS: list of alliances of the Zrich-Montpellier classification system in which the species is found; NUMBER OF PHYTOGEOGRAPHICAL DISTRICTS from which the species is reported, divided into the three basic types: Thermophyticum, Mesophyticum, Oreophyticum (Skalick 1988); ALTITUDINAL RANGE: minimum, maximum; ABUNDANCE in the wild at the territory of the country: single locality, rare, scattered, locally abundant, common, extinct (if no records have been known for a long period); quantitative estimate of the number of localities using the scale of Clement & Foster (1994): 14, 514, 1549, 50499, at least 500 localities; REGION where the occurence is concentrated given that species distribution has a regional pattern. TYPE OF INTRODUCTION into the country: deliberate, accidental, or both types. Spontaneously originated hybrids are considered as accidental, hybrids escaped from cultivation are considered deliberate. PLANTING PURPOSE: ornamental, forestry, agriculture (other than food), food, oil, fodder, medicinal, botanical, bee, textile, dye, landscaping, etc. VECTOR OF ACCIDENTAL INTRODUCTION: grain, seed, fodder, wool, cotton, vine, flax, agricultural products, ore, soya beans, bird-seed, garden material, etc; HISTORY OF INTRODUCTION: description of the introduction into the country and species invasion history. INVASIVENESS ELSEWHERE in the world. III. Native distribution. AREA OF ORIGIN: classified into geographical regions according to the system used by Brummitt et al. (2001); MAPS available, showing species distribution; LATITUDINAL AND LONGITUDINAL RANGE of primary distribution; HABITATS occupied in primary distribution area; MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM HEIGHT reached in primary distribution area. IV. Biological and ecological characteristics. LIFE FORM: annual, biennial, monocarpic perennial, polycarpic perennial, shrub, semishrub, tree, climber; RAUNKIAER SCHEME: therophyte, hemicryptophyte, geophyte, chamaephyte, nanophanerophyte, phanerophyte; LIFE STRATEGY: C, S, R, CS, CSR, SR (Grime 1979); CLONALITY TYPE (according to Klimeov & Klime 1998). MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM HEIGHT reached in the Czech Republic; SEXUAL REPRODUCTION IN CR: yes, no, rarely; BREEDING SYSTEM: allogamy (protandry, protogyny), autogamy (facultative, obligate), cleistogamy, apogamy, geitonogamy; SEX TYPE: dioecy, monoecy, andromonoecy, gynomonoecy, gynodioecy, polygamy; PLOIDY LEVEL; CHROMOSOME NUMBER; DNA CONTENT: taken from Bennett & Leitch (2001); HYBRID TYPE: none, neophyte neophyte, neophyte native, neophyte archaeophyte, archaeophyte archaeophyte, archaeophyte native, originated in cultivation; FLOWERING TIME: start, end; FLOWER COLOUR; FRUIT TYPE: achene, nut, berry, drupe, capsule, follicle, pod, siliqua, silicula, loment, pome, nutlet, schizokarpium; FRUIT SIZE: minimum, maximum; SEED SIZE: minimum, maximum; PROPAGULE: seed, fruit, fruit fragment; stem, whole plant, root, rhizome, rosette; PROPAGULE WEIGHT; FECUNDITY: number of propagules per plant; SEED BANK TYPE: IIV (Thompson et al. 1997); PROPAGULE CHARACTERISTIC: description and special features; DORMANCY: non-dormant, morphological, physiological, morphophysiological (Baskin & Baskin 1999); POLLINATION MODE: wind, insect; DISPERSAL MODE: autochory, endozoochory, epizoochory, myrmecochory (dispersal by ants), anemochory (wind), hydrochory (water); ELLENBERG INDICATOR VALUES: light, temperacture, moisture, soil reaction, nitrogen (Ellenberg et al. 1991).