%LEOLRJUDSK\

Aarts, B. (1992). Small Clauses in English. the nonverbal tvpes. Berlin and New
York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Aarts, B. (1998). English Binominal Noun Phrases. Transactions of the Philological
Societv 96, 117-158.
Aarts, B. (to appear). Modelling linguistic gradience.
Aarts, B., G. Nelson and S. Wallis (1998). Using Euzzy Tree Eragments to explore
English grammar. English Todav 55. 52-56.
Aarts, B., Denison, D., Keizer, E. and G. Popova (eds) (to appear). Fu::v Grammar.
A reader. OxIord: OxIord University Press.
Aarts, E. (1971). On the distribution oI Noun Phrase types in English clause structure.
Lingua 26, 281-293.
Aarts J., De Mnnick, I. and H. Wekker (eds) (1997). Studies in English Language
and Teaching, in honour of Flor Aarts. Rodopi: Amsterdam.
Abbot, V., Black, J.B. and E.E. Smith (1985). The representation oI scripts in
memory. Journal of Memorv and Language 24, 179-199.
Abbott, B. (1996). Doing without a Partitive Constraint. In: J. Hoeksema (ed.), 26-56.
Abney, S.P. (1986), Eunctional elements and licencing. Paper presented at the 1986
Girona GLOW conIerence.
Abney, S.P. (1987), The English Noun Phrase in its sentential aspect. PhD
Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Acua-Earia, J.C. (1996). The pu::le of apposition. on so-called appositive
structures in English. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.
Acua-Earia, J.C, (1999). On apposition. English Language and Linguistics 3/1, 59-
81.
Acua-Earia, J.C. (1994). Review oI Meyer (1992). Atlantis 16, 321-326.
Aijmer, K. and B. Altenberg (eds) (1991), English Corpus Linguistics. London:
Longman.
Akmajian, A. (1975). More evidence Ior an NP-cycle. Linguistic Inquirv 6, 114-130.
Akmajian, A. and A. Lehrer (1976). NP-like quantiIiers and the problem oI
determining the head oI an NP. Linguistic Analvsis 2/4, 395-413.
Anderson, J. (1976). On seriali:ation in English svntax. Ludwigsburg Studies in
Language and Linguistics 1. Ludwigsburg: R.O.U. Strauch.
Anderson, J.A. (1977). Neural models with cognitive implications. In: D. LaBerge
and S.J. Samuels (eds), 27-90.
Anderson, J.R. (2000). Cognitive psvchologv and its implications. EiIth edition. New
York: Worth Publishers.
Anderson, R.C. (1977). Schema-directed processes in language comprehension. In:
Lesgold et al. (eds), 67-82.
Anderson, R.C. (1985). Role oI the reader's schema in comprehension, learning and
memory. In: H. Singer and R.B. Ruddell (eds), 374-384.
Anderson, S.R. and R.P. Kiparky (eds) (1973). A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New
York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Asher, R.E. and J.M.Y. Simpson (eds) (1994), The Encvclopaedia of Language and
Linguistics, Vol. I. OxIord: Pergamon Press.
Aston, G. and L. Burnard (1998). The BNC Handbook. Exploring the British national
Corpus with SARA. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Austin, Erances O. (1980). A crescent-shaped jewel oI an island: appositive nouns in
phrases separated by of. English Studies 61, 357-366.
Austin, J.L. (1962). How to do things with words. OxIord: Clarendon press.
Auwera, J. van der (ed.) (1980). The semantics of determiners. London: Croom Helm.
Bailey, C-J. and R. W. Shuy (eds) (1973). New wavs of analv:ing variation in
English. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Bach, E. and R.T. Harms (eds) (1968). Universals in linguistic theorv. New York:
Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Baker, C.L. and J. McCarthy (eds) (1981). The logical problem of language
acquisition. Cambridge, Mass: MIT press.
Baltin, M. (1981). Strict bounding. In: C.L. Baker and J. McCarthy (eds), ???
Baltin, M. (1984). Extraposition rules and discontinuous constituents. Linguistic
Inquirv 15, 157-163.
Baltin, M. (1987). Degree complements. In: G.J. Huck and A.E. Ojeda (eds), 11-26.
Baltin, M. and C. Collins (eds) (2001), The handbook of contemporarv svntactic
theorv. Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
Barsalou, L.W. (1983). Ad-hoc categories. Memorv and Cognition 11, 211-227.
Bartlett, E.C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bartsch, R. and T. Vennemann (1972). Semantic structures. ErankIurt: Athenum.
Barwise J. and R. Cooper (1981). Generalized quantiIiers and natural language.
Linguistic Philosophv 4/2, 159-220.
Buerle, R., Egli, U. and A. von Stechow (eds) (1983). Meaning, use and
interpretation of language. Berlin: de Gruyter.
De Beaugrande, R. de (1980). Text, discourse and process. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Bechtel, W. and A. Abrahamsen (1991). Connectionism and the mind. an
introduction to parallel processing in networks. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell.
Bell, A. (1988). The British and the American Connection in new Zealand media
English. American Speech 63, 326-344.
Belletti, A., Brandi, L. and L. Rizzi (eds) (1981). Theory oI markedness in generative
grammar. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore.
Bennis, H. and J. de Vries (eds) (1992). De binnenbouw van het Nederlands. een
bundle artiekelen voor Piet Paardekooper. Dordrecht: JCG Publications.
Berg, Th. (1998). The resolution oI number conIlicts in English and German
agreement patterns. Linguistics 36, 41-70.
Berkel, A. van (1991). Cognitieve aspecten van handelingsbeschrifvingen. Doctoral
dissertation, University oI Groningen.
Berlin, B. (1976). The concept oI rank in ethnobotanical classiIication. American
Ethnologist 3, 381-399.
Berlin, B. (1978). Ethnobotanical classiIication. In: E. Rosch and B.B. Lloyd (eds), 1-
26.
Berlin, B. and P. Kay (1969). Basic color terms. Their universalitv and evolution.
Berkeley: University oI CaliIornia Press.
Berlin, B., D.E. Breedlove and P.H. Raven (1974). Principles of T:eltal plant
classification. New York: Academic.
Bernstein, J. (2001). The DP-Hypothesis: identiIying clausal properties in the clausal
domain. In: M. Baltin and C. Collins (eds), 536-561.
Bhatt, Ch. (1990). Die Svntaktische Struktur der Nominalphrase im Deutschen.
Tbingen: Narr.
Bhatt, Ch., E. Lbel and Cl. Schmidt (eds) (1989). Svntactic phrase structure
phenomena in noun phrases and sentences. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Birner, B.J. and G. Ward (1998). Information status and non-canonical word order in
English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Blom, A. (1977). Het kwantitieve Er. Spektator 6-7/8, 387-395.
Bock, J. K. and J.C. Cutting (1992). Regulating mental energy: perIormance units in
language production. Journal of memorv and Language 31, 99-126. (CHECK)
Bock, J. K. and Eberhard, K.M. (1993). Meaning, sound and syntax in English
number agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes 8, 57-99. (CHECK)
Bock, J. K. and C.A. Miller (1991). Broken Agreement. Cognitive Psvchologv 23, 45-
93.
Bock, J. K., Nicol, J. and J. C. Cutting (1999). The ties that bind: creating number
agreement in speech. Journal of Memorv and Language 40, 330-346.
Bolinger, D.L. (1958). Stress and inIormation. American Speech 33: 5-20.
Bolinger, D.L. (1961). Generalitv, gradience and the all-or none. The Hague:
Mouton.
Bolkestein, A.M., De Groot, C. and J.L. Mackenzie (eds) (1985). Svntax and pragmatics
in Functional Grammar. Dordrecht: Eoris.
Borsley, R.D. (ed.) (2000). Svntax and Semantics. the nature and function of svntactic
categories. San Diego: Academic Press.
Bower, G.H, Black, J.B. and T.J. Turner (1985). Scripts in memory Ior texts. In: H.
Singer and R.B. Ruddell (eds), 434-476.
Bresnan, J. (1982). The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge
MA: MIT Press.
Bresnan, J. (2001). Lexical-functional svntax. OxIord: Blackwell.
Brown, R.(1965). Social psvchologv. New York: Eree Press.
Brown, C. (1983). Topic continuity in written English narrative. In: T. Givon (ed.),
315-341.
Brown, G. and G. Yule (1983). Discourse analvsis. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Brown, P. and S. C. Levinson (1978). Universals in language usage: politeness
phenomena`. In: E.N. Goody (ed.), 56-289.
Brown, P. and S. C. Levinson (1987). Politeness. some universals in language usage.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brugman, C. (1988). The storv of over. polvsemv, semantics and the structure of the
lexicon. New York: Garland Press.
Brugman, C. and G. LakoII (1988). Cognitive typology and lexical networks. In: S.
Small et al. (eds), 477-507.
Bunt, H. and A. van Horck (eds) (1996). Discontinuous constituencv. Berlin: Mouton
de Gruyter.
Burton-Roberts, N. (1975). Nominal apposition. Foundations of Language 13, 391-
419.
Burton-Roberts, N. (1994). Apposition. In: R.E. Asher and J.M.Y. Simpson (eds),
184-187.
Cann, R. (2000). Eunctional versus Lexical: a cognitive dichotomy. In: R.D. Borsley
(ed.), 37-78.
Caspel, P.P.J. van (1970). Een schat van een (niet meer zo jong) kind. De Nieuwe
Taalgids 63, 280-287.
ChaIe, W.L. (1970). Meaning and the structure of language. Chicago: University oI
Chicago Press.
ChaIe, W.L. (1974). Language and consciousness. Language 50, 111-133.
ChaIe, W.L. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, deIiniteness, subjects and topics. In :
C.N. Li (ed.), 27-55.
ChaIe, W.L. (1987). Cognitive constraints on inIormation Ilow. In: R. S. Tomlin (ed.),
21-51.
ChaIe, W.L. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time. the flow and displacement
of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University oI
Chicago Press.
ChaIe, W.L. (2001). The analysis oI discourse Ilow. In: D. SchiIIrin et al. (eds), 673-
687.
Chang. N., Narayanan, S. and M.R.L. Petruck (2002a). Putting Erames in Perspective.
In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational
Linguistics, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chang, N., Eeldman, J., Porzel, R. and K. Sanders (2002b). Scaling Cognitive
Linguistics: Eormalisms Ior Language Understanding. In: Proceedings of the
1
st
International Workshop on Scalable Natural Language Understanding,
Heidelberg, Germany.
Chomsky, N. (1970). Remarks on nominalization. In: R.A. Jacobs and P.S.
Rosenbaum (eds), 184-221. Also appeared in N. Chomsky (1972), 11-61.
Chomsky, N. (1972). Studies on semantics in Generative Grammar. The Hague:
Mouton.
Chomsky, N. (1973). Conditions on transIormations. In: S.R. Anderson and R.P.
Kiparsky (eds), ??
Christiansen, M.H. and N. Chater (1999). Connectionist natural language processing:
The state oI the art. Cognitive Science 23, 417-437.
Christophersen, P. (1939). The articles. a studv of their theorv and use in English.
Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules oI language: a multidisciplinary study oI
German inIlection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, 991-1060.
Clark, H.H. and E.V. Clark (1977). Psvchologv and language, an introduction to
psvcholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Clark, H.H. and S.E. Haviland (1974). Psychological processes as linguistic explanation.
In: D. Cohen (ed.), 91-124.
Clark, H.H. and S.E. Haviland (1977). Comprehension and the Given-New contract. In:
R.O. Ereedle (ed.), 1-40.
Clark, H.H. and C.R. Marshall (1981). DeIinite reIerence and mutual knowledge. In:
A.K. Joshi et al. (eds) 1981, 10-63.
CoIer, C.N. (1976). The structure of human memorv. San Erancisco: Ereeman.
Cohen, D. (ed.) (1974). Explaining linguistic phenomena. Washington D.C.:
Hemisphere.
Cole, P. (ed.) (1981). Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.
Cole, P. and J. Morgan (eds) (1975). Speech Acts. Svntax and Semantics 3. New
York: Academic Press.
Collins, P. and D. Lee (eds) (1999), The Clause in English. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.
Coppen, P-A. (1991). Specifving the Noun Phrase. Thesis Publishers: Amsterdam.
Coppen, P-A. (1992). SpeciIying the Noun Phrase. Computational Linguistics 18,
155.
Corbett, G.G. (1979). The agreement hierarchy. Journal of Linguistics 15, 203-224.
Corbett, G.G. (1994). Agreement. In: R.E Asher and J.M.Y. Simpson (eds), 54-60.
Corbett, G.G., Eraser, N.M. and S. McGlashan (eds) (1993). Heads in grammatical
theorv. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Craig C. (ed.) (1986). Noun classes and categori:ation. Proceedings of a svmposium
on categori:ation and noun classification. Eugene, Oregon, October 1983.
Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Culicover, P.W., Wasow, T. and A. Akmajian (1977) (eds). Formal svntax. New
York: Academic Press.
Curme, G.O. (1931). A Grammar of the English Language. Svntax. Boston: Heath
and Co.
Dahl, . (1971). Nouns as set constants. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical
Linguistics 3.
Danes, E. (1974). Eunctional Sentence Perspective and the organization oI text. In: E.
Danes (ed.), 106-128.
Danes, E. (ed.) (1974). Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective. Prague:
Academia.
Davidson, D. and G. Harman (eds) (1972). Semantics of natural language. Dordrecht:
Reidel.
Deane, P. (1987). English possessive, possession and the Silverstein hierarchy.
Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkelev Linguistics Societv 13, 65-
76.
Deane, P. (1992). Grammar in mind and brain. explorations in Cognitive Svntax.
Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Declerck, R. (1986). Two notes on the theory oI deIiniteness. Journal of Linguistics
22/1, 25-39.
Declerck, R. (1988). Studies on copular sentences, clefts and pseudoclefts. Leuven:
Leuven University Press/Eortis Publications.
Delsing, L.-O. (1991). QuantiIication in the Swedish Noun Phrase. Working papers in
Scandinavian Svntax 47, 89-117.
Denison, D. (1998). Svntax. In: S. Romaine (ed.), 93-329.
Denison, D. and M.E. Keizer (in preparation). Sort of-constructions: grammar and
change.
Dietrich, R. and C.E. Graumann (eds) (1979). Language processing in social context.
Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland.
Dik, S.C. (1997a). The Theorv of Functional Grammar. Part 1. The structure of the
clause. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dik, S.C. (1997b). The Theorv of Functional Grammar. Part 2. Complex and derived
constructions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dik, S.C. (ed.) (1983). Advances in Functional Grammar. Dordrecht: Eoris.
Dikken, M. den (1995). Copulas. Ms. Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.
Dornic, S. (ed.) (1977). Attention & Performance JI. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
Dowty, D. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67/3, 547-
619.
Dowty, D. and P. Jacobson (1988/9?). In: J. Powers and K. de Jong (eds), 95-108.
Dresher, B.E. and N.H. Hornstein (1976). On some supposed contributions oI
artiIicial intelligence to the scientiIic study oI language. Cognition 4, 321-398.
Drijkoningen E. and K. Hengeveld (eds) (1993). Linguistics in the Netherlands 1993.
Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Eberhard, K. M. (1997). The marked eIIect oI number on subject-verb agreement.
Journal of Memorv and Language 36, 147-164.
Eberhard, K. M. (1999). The accessibility oI conceptual number to the processes oI
subject-verb agreement in English. Journal of Memorv and Language 41, 560-
578.
Ekman, P. (1971). Universals and cultural diIIerences in Iacial expressions oI
emotions. Lincoln: University oI Nebraska Press.
Ekman, P., R.W. Levenson and P. Ellsworth (1972). Emotion in the human face.
ElmsIord N.Y.: Pergamon Press.
Es, G.A. and P.P.J. van Caspel (1971-1975). Svntaxis van het moderne Nederlands.
Groningen.
Everaert, M. (1992). Nogmaals: een schat van een kind. In: H. Bennis and J. de Vries
(eds), 45-54.
Eeldman, J.A. and D.H Ballard (1982). Connectionist models and their properties.
Cognitive Science 6, 205-254.
Eillmore, C.J. (1968). The case Ior case. In: E. Bach and R.T. Harms (eds), 1-88.
Eillmore, C.J. (1975). An alternative to checklist theories oI meaning. In: Proceedings
of the first annual meeting of the Berkelev Linguistics Societv. Berkeley:
Berkeley: Linguistics Society, 123-131.
Eillmore, C.J. (1977). Scenes-and-Irames semantics. In: Zampolli (ed.), 55-81??.
Eillmore, C.J. (1978). The organization oI semantic inIormation in the lexicon. In:
Papers from the parasession on the lexicon. Chicago Linguistics Society, 148-
173.
Eillmore, C.J. (1982). Toward a descriptive Iramework Ior spatial deixis. In: R.J.
Jarvella and W. Klein (eds), 31-59.
Eillmore, C.J. (1985a). Erames and the semantics oI understanding. Quaderni di
Semantica 6/2, 222-253.
Eillmore, C.J. (1985b). Syntactic intrusions and the notion oI grammatical
construction. Proceedings of the 11
th
Annual Meeting of the Berkelev
Linguistic Societv, 73-86.
Eillmore, C.J. (1988). The mechanisms oI 'Construction Grammar. Proceedings of
the 14
th
Annual Meeting of the Berkelev Linguistic Societv, 35-55.
Eillmore, C.J., Wooter and C.E. Baker (2001). Building a large lexical databank
which provides deep semantics. In: B. Tsou and O. Kwong (eds), ??
Eirbas, J. (1966). On deIining the theme in Iunctional sentence analysis. Travaux
Linguistiques de Prague, Vol. 1, 267-280.
Elickinger, D.P., Macken, M. and N. Wiegand (1982) (eds). Proceedings of the First
West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Linguistics Department
StanIord, StanIord, CaliIornia.
Eodor, J.A. and Z.W. Pylyshyn (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture: a
critical analysis. Cognition 28, 3-71.
Eodor, J.D. (1977). Semantics. theories of meaning in Generative Grammar.
Hassocks: Harvester Press.
Eodor, J.D. and I. Sag (1982). ReIerential and quantiIicational indeIinites. Linguistics
and Philosophv 5, 355-401.
Eoley, W. and R. D. Van Valin (1984). Functional svntax and universal grammar.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eortescue, M., Harder, P. and L. Kristophersen (eds) (1992), Lavered structure and
reference in a functional perspective, Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Erancis, W. N. (1958). The structure of American English. New York: Ronald.
Eranck, J. Vigliocco, G. and J. Nicol (2002). Subject-verb agreement errors in Erench
and English: the role oI syntactic hierarchy. Language and Cognitive Processes
17, 371-404.
Ereedle, R.O. (ed.) (1977). Discourse Production and Comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J.:
Ablex.
Ereedle, R.O. (ed.) (1979). New directions in discourse processing. Norwood, N.J.:
Ablex.
Eries, C. C. (1952). The structure of English. New York: Harcourt.
Eries, P. H. (1999). Post nominal modiIiers in the English noun phrase. In: P. Collins
and D. Lee (eds), 93-110.
Eries, U. (1988). The crew have abandoned the ship. Concord with collective nouns
revisited. Arbeiten aus Anglistik and Amerikanistik 13, 98-104.
Eujimura, O. (ed.). Three dimensions of Linguistic Theorv, Tokyo: TEC.
Geiger, R. (ed.) (1995). Reference in multidisciplinarv perspective, Hildesheim: Georg
Olms Verlag.
Gestel, E.C. van (1986). X-bar Grammar. attribution and predication in Dutch.
Dordrecht: Eoris.
Givon, T. (1979). On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.
Givon, T. (1984). Svntax. a Functional-Tvpological Introduction. Vol. 1. Amsterdam:
John Benjamins.
Givon, T. (1986). Prototypes: between Plato and Wittgenstein. In: C. Craig (ed.), 77-
102.
Givon, T. (1988). The pragmatics oI word order: predictability, importance and
attention. In: M. Hammond et al. (eds), 243-284.
Givon, T. (1990). Svntax. a Functional-Tvpological Introduction. Vol. 2. Amsterdam:
John Benjamins.
Givon, T. (1993). English Grammar. a Function-based Introduction. Vol. 1.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Givon, T. (1995). Functionalism and grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Givon, T. (2001). Svntax. an introduction. Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Givon, T. (ed.) (1983). Topic continuitv in discourse. a quantitative cross-language
studv. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goldberg, A.E. (1995). Constructions. a construction grammar approach to
argument structure. Chicago: University oI Chicago Press.
Goodenough, W.H. (ed.) (1964). Explorations in cultural anthropologv. New York:
McGraw-Hill.
Goody, E.N. (ed.) (1978). Questions and politeness. strategies in social interaction.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Graesser, A.C and L.E. Clark (1985a). Structures and procedures of implicit
knowledge. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Graesser, A.C and L.E. Clark (1985b). The generation oI knowledge-based inIerences
during narrative comprehension. In: G. Rickheit and H. Strohner (eds), 53-94.
Greenbaum, S. and Y. Ni (1996). About the ICE-Tagset. In: S. Greenbaum (ed.), 92-
109.
Greenbaum, S. (ed.) (1996). Comparing English worldwide. the International Corpus
of English. OxIord Clarendon Press.
Greenberg, J.H. (ed.) (1978), Universals of human language, Vol. 4.: Svntax.
StanIord: StanIord University Press.
Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In: P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds), 41-58.
Groot, A.W. de (1965), Structurele syntaxis (2
nd
ed.). Den Haag: Servire.
Gueron, J. (1980). On the syntax and semantics oI PP extraposition. Linguistic Inquirv
11, 636-678.
Gueron, J. and R. May (1984). Extraposition and logical Iorm. Linguistic Inquirv 15,
1-31
Gundel, J. K. (1988). Universals oI topic-comment structure. In: M. Hammond et al.
(eds), 209-239.
Haan, P. de (1989). Postmodifving clauses in the English Noun Phrase. a corpus-
based studv. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English, Part 2. Journal of
Linguistics 3, 199-244.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1985, 1994). An introduction to Functional Grammar. 2
nd
edition.
London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M.A.K. and R. Hasan (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Hammond, M., Moravcsik, E.A. and J. Wirth (eds) (1988). Studies in svntactic
tvpologv. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hannay, M. (1985a). English existentials in Functional Grammar. Dordrecht: Eoris.
Hannay, M. (1985b). InIerrability, discourse-boundness, and subtopics. In: A.M.
Bolkestein et al. (eds), 49-63.
Haugen, E. (1953). On resolving the close apposition. American Speech 28, 165-170.
Hawkins, J.A. (1978). Definiteness and indefiniteness. London: Croom Helm.
Hawkins, J.A. (1983). Word order universals. New York: Academic Press.
Hawkins, J.A. (1984). A note on reIerent identiIiability and co-presence. Journal of
Pragmatics 8, 649-659.
Hawkins, J.A. (1994). A perIormance theory oI order and constituency. Cambridge:
CUP.
Hawkins, R. (1981). Towards an explanation oI the possessive construction NP`s N
and N oI NP. Journals of Linguistics 17: 247-269.
Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definiteness and indefiniteness. PhD Dissertation,
University oI Massachusetts.
Heim, I. (1983). Eile change semantics and the Iamiliarity theory. In: R. Buerle et al.
(eds), 164-189.
Heine, B., Claudi U. and E. Hnnemeyer (1991). Grammaticali:ation. A Conceptual
Framework. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Hengeveld, K. (1992). Parts oI speech. In: M. Eortescue et al. (eds), 29-55.
Hinton, G.E. and J.A. Anderson (eds) (1989). Parallel models of associative memorv.
Updated edition. Hillsdale, NL: Erlbaum.
Hockett, Ch. E. (1955). Attribution and apposition in English. American Speech 30:
99-102.
Hockett, Ch. E. (1958). A course in modern linguistics. New York: MacMillan.
Hoeksema, J. (1996). Introduction. In: Hoeksema (ed.), 1-25.
Hoeksema, J. (ed.) (1996). Partitives. studies on the svntax and semantics of partitive
and related constructions. Berlin: Mouton the Gruyter.
Hopper, P. and E. C. Traugott (1993). Grammaticali:ation. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Hopper, P. and S. Thompson (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse.
Language 56, 251-299.
Hopper, P. and S. Thompson (1984). The discourse basis Ior lexical categories in
Universal Grammar. Language 60, 703-752.
Hornstein, N. and D. LightIoot (1981). Introduction. In: N. Hornstein and D.
LightIoot (eds), 9-31.
Hornstein, N. and D. LightIoot (1981). Explanation in Linguistics. Longman: London.
Huck, G. and A.E. Ojeda (eds) (1987). Svntax and Semantics 20. Discontinuous
constituencv. New York: Academic Press.
Huddleston, R. (1984). Introduction to the grammar of English. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Huddleston, R. and G.K. Pullum (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English
Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hudson, R. A. (1987). Zwicky on heads. Journal of Linguistics 23, 109-132.
Hudson, R. A. (1990). English Word Grammar. OxIord: Blackwell.
Hudson, R. A. (1993). Do we have heads in our minds? In G.G. Corbett et al. (eds),
266-291.
Hudson, R. A. (1997). Syntax without Iunctional categories. UCL Working Papers in
Linguistics 9. 253-279.
Hudson, R.A. (2000). Grammar without Iunctional categories. In: R.D. Borsley, (ed.),
7-35.
JackendoII, R.J. (1971). Gapping and related rules. Linguistic Inquirv 2, 21-35.
JackendoII, R.J. (1972). Semantic interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge,
Mass: MIT Press.
JackendoII, R.J. (1977). X Svntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
JackendoII, R.J. (1983). Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
JackendoII, R.J. (1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
JackendoII, R.J. (1992). Languages of the mind. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
JackendoII, R.J. (2002). Foundations of language. brain, meaning, grammar
evolution. OxIord, OxIord University Press.
Jacobs, R.A. and P.S. Rosenbaum (eds) (1970). Readings in English
Transformational Grammar. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn.
Jakobson, R. and S. Kawamoto (eds) (1970). Studies in general and oriental
linguistics. Tokyo: TEC Corporation Ior Language and Educational Research.
Janssen, Th.A.J.M. and G. Redeker (eds) (1999), Cognitive Linguistics. Foundations,
Scope, and Methodologv.
Jarvella, R.J. and W. Klein (eds) (1982). Speech, place and action. studies in deixis
and related topics. Chichester: Wiley.
Jespersen, O. (1924). Philosophv of grammar. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Jespersen, O. (1933). Essentials of English Grammar. London: George Allen and
Unwin.
Joshi, A.K., Webber, B.L. and I. Sag (eds) (1981). Elements of discourse understanding.
Cambridge: CUP.
Kay, P. (1990). Even. Linguistics and Philosophv 13/1, 59-112.
Kay, P. and C. McDaniel (1978). The linguistic signiIicance oI the meaning oI basic
color terms. Language 54, 610-646.
Kayne, R. (1994). The antisymmetry oI syntax. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Keenan, E.L. (ed.) (1975). Formal semantics of natural language. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Keenan, E.L. and Stavi (1986). A semantic characterization oI natural language
determiners. Linguistics and Philosophv 9, 253-326.
Keenan, E.O. and B. SchieIIelin (1976). Topic as a discourse notion. In: C.N. Li (ed.),
335-384.
Keizer, M.E. (1988). DeIiniteness and indeIiniteness: a scalar representation. Working
Papers in Functional Grammar 26.
Keizer, M.E. (1991). ReIerring in Eunctional Grammar: how to deIine reIerence and
reIerring expressions, Working Papers in Functional Grammar 43.
Keizer, M.E. (1992a). Reference, predication and (in)definiteness in Functional
Grammar. A functional approach to English copular sentences. PhD
dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Keizer, M.E. (1992b). 'Predicates as reIerring expressions'. In: M. Eortescue et al. (eds),
1-27.
Keizer, M.E. (1995). 'ReIerring in Eunctional Grammar: properties and relations as
zero-order entities'. In: R. Geiger (ed.), ??
Keizer, M.E. (2002). Review oI Inge de Mnnick: On the move. The mobility oI
constituents in the English noun phrase: a multi-method approach. English
language and Linguistics, 6/1, 210-216.
Kintsch, W. (1989). The representation oI knowledge and the use oI knowledge in
discourse comprehension. In: R. Dietrich and C.E. Graumann (eds), 185-209.
Kirk, J.M. (ed.) (1999). Corpora Galore, Proceedings of the 19
th
International
Conference on English Language Research on Computeri:ed Corpora,
ICAME-98. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Kruisinga, E. (1925), A handbook of present-dav English, Part II/2. 4
th
ed. Utrecht:
Kemink & Zn.
Kruisinga, E. & P. Erades (1947). An English Grammar, Jol. I/1. 7
th
ed. Groningen:
??.
Kuno, S. (1970). Some properties oI non-reIerential noun phrases. In: R. Jakobson
and S. Kawamoto (eds), 348-373.
Kuno, S. (1972). Eunctional Sentence Perspective: a case study Irom Japanese and
English. Linguistic Inquirv 3, 269-320.
LaBerge, D. and S.J. Samuels (eds) 91977). Basic processes in reading. perception
and comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Labov, W. (1973). The boundaries oI words and their meanings. In: C-J. Bailey and
R.W. Shuy (eds), 340-373.
Ladusaw, W. (1982). Semantic constraints on the English partitive construction. In:
D.P. Elickinger et al. (eds), 231-242.
LakoII, G. (1972). Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic oI Iuzzy
concepts. In: Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistics
Societv, 183-228.
LakoII, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things. what categories reveal about
the mind. Chicago and London: University oI Chicago Press.
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form. topic, focus and the
mental representation of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Jol. 1.. Theoretical
prerequisites. StanIord: StanIord University Press.
Langacker, R.W. (1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Jol. 2.. Descriptive
application. StanIord: StanIord University Press.
Langacker, R.W. (1992). The symbolic nature oI Cognitive Grammar: the meaning oI
of and of-periphrasis. In: M. Ptz (ed.), 483-502.
Langacker, R.W. (1993). ReIerence point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 4, 1-38.
Langacker, R.W. (1999). Grammar and Conceptuali:ation. Berlin: Mouton de
Gruyter
Langacker, R.W. (2002). Concept, image, and svmbol: The cognitive basis of
grammar. 2
nd
ed. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lee, D.W. (1952). Close apposition: an unresolved problem. American Speech 27,
268-275.
Leech, G.N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
Lehmann, W. and Y. Malkiel (eds) (1968). Directions for historical linguistics.
Austin: University oI Texas Press.
Lehnert, W.G. and M.H. Ringle (eds) (1982). Strategies for natural language
processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lesgold, A.M., Pellegrin, J.W., Eokkema, S.D. and R. Glaser (eds) (1977). Cognitive
psvchologv and instruction. New York: Plenum.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking. from intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Li, C.N. and S. Thompson (1976). Subject and Topic: a new typology oI language. In:
C.N Li (ed.), 457-489.
Li, C.N. (ed.) (1976). Subfect and Topic. New York: Academic Press.
Lindstromberg, S. (1997). English prepositions explained. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins
Lbel, E. (1989). Q as a Iunctional category. In: Ch. Bhatt et al. (eds), 133-158.
Lbel, E. (1990). D und Q als Iunktionale Kategorien in der Nominalphrase.
Linguistische Berichte 127, 232-264.
Lbner, S. (1985). DeIinites. Journal of Semantics 4, 279-326.
Lounsbury, E. (1964). A Iormal account oI the Crow- and Omaha-type kinship
terminologies. In: W.H. Goodenough (ed.), 351-394. Reprinted in S. A. Tyler
(ed.) (1969), 212-254.
Lyons, C.G. (1980). The meaning oI the English deIinite article. In: J. Van der
Auwera ed. (1980: 81-95).
Lyons, J. (1977), Semantics, 2 volumes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mackenzie J.L. (1983). Nominal predicates in a Eunctional Grammar oI English. In:
S.C. Dik (ed.), 31-51.
Mackenzie, J.L. (1986). Aspects oI nominalization in English and Dutch. Working
Papers in Functional Grammar 15.
Mackenzie, J.L. (1997). Grammar, discourse and knowledge: the use oI such in
written language. In: J. Aarts et al. (eds). 85-105.
Mackenzie J.L. and M.E. Keizer (1990). On assigning pragmatic Iunctions in EG,
Pragmatics 1/2, 169-215. Also appeared in Working Papers in Functional
Grammar 38, Pragmatic Iunctions: the view Irom the VU, and Dutch Working
Papers in English Language and Linguistics 21.
Mallinson, G. and B.J. Blake (1981). Language tvpologv. cross-linguistic studies in
svntax. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
MalouI, R.P. (1999). Mixed categories in the hierarchical lexicon. (Center Ior the
Study oI Language and InIormation Publication Lecture Notes, 90). StanIord:
CSLI Publications.
Matheson, C.A. (1990). Svntax and semantics of English partititive noun phrases. a
phrase structure account. PhD Dissertation, University oI Edinburgh,
Edinburgh.
Matthews, P.H. (1981). Svntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCawley, J.D. (1968). The role oI semantics in grammar. In: Bach and Harms
(eds.), 125-169.
McCawley, J.D. (1982). Parentheticals and discontinuous constituents. Linguistic
Inquirv 13, 91-106.
McCawley, J.D. (1987). Some additional evidence Ior discontinuity. In: G.J. Huck
and A.E. Ojeda (eds), 185-200.
McCawley, J.D. (1988). The svntactic phenomena of English, 2 volumes, Chicago:
Chicago University Press.
McClelland, J.L. (1981). Retrieving general and speciIic inIormation Irom stored
knowledge oI speciIics. Proceedings of the third annual meeting of the
Cognitive Science Societv, 170-171.
McClelland, J.L. and D.E. Rumelhart (1985). Distributed memory and the
representation oI general and speciIic inIormation. Journal of Experimental
Psvchologv. General 114, 159-188.
McClelland, J.L. and M.S. Seidenberg (2000). Why do kids say goed and brang?
review oI Pinker (1999). Science 287 (5450): 47-48.
McClelland, J.L., Rumelhart, D.E. and G.E. Hinton (1986). The appeal oI parallel
distributed processing. In: J.L. McClelland and D.E. Rumelhart (eds) (1986a),
3-44.
McClelland, J.L. and D.E. Rumelhart (1986a). A distributed model oI human learning
and memory. In: J.L. McClelland and D.E. Rumelhart (eds) (1986c), 170-215.
McClelland, J.L. and D.E. Rumelhart (eds) (1986b). Parallel distributed processing,
Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Vol. 1. Cambridge, Mass.:
MIT Press.
McClelland, J.L. and D.E. Rumelhart (eds) (1986c). Parallel distributed processing,
Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Vol. 2. Cambridge, Mass.:
MIT Press.
McGloskey, M. and S. Glucksburg (1978). Natural categories: well-deIined or Iuzzy
sets? Memorv and Cognition 6, 462-472.
Meyer, Ch. E. (1987). Apposition in English. Journal of Linguistics 20: 101-121.
Meyer, Ch. E. (1991). A corpus-based study oI apposition in English. In: K. Aijmer
and B. Altenberg (eds), 166-181.
Meyer, Ch. E. (1992). Apposition in Contemporarv English. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Minsky, M. (1975). A Iramework Ior representing knowledge. In: Winston (ed.),
211-277.
Mnnick, I. de (2000). On the move. The mobilitv of constituents in the English noun
phrase. a multi-method approach. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Montague, R. (1974). Formal philosophv. Edited by Richmond Thomason. New
Haven: Yale University Press.
Moravcsik, E.A. (1978). Agreement. In: J.H. Greenberg (ed.), 331-374.
Morgan, J. L. (1972). Verb agreement as a rule oI English. Papers from the Regional
Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Societv 8, 278-286.
Morton, J. (1969). Interaction oI inIormation in word recognition. Psvchological
Review 76, 165-178.
Napoli, D.J. (1989). Predication theorv. a case studv for indexing theorv. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Napoli, D.J and J.A. Kegl (eds) (1991). Bridges between linguistics and psvchologv. a
Swathmore Festschrift for Lila Gleitman. Hillsdale NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Narayanan, S. and D. JuraIsky (1998). Bayesian models oI human sentence
processing. In: Proceedings of the 20
th
Cognitive Science Societv Conference,
84-90. Hillsdale N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Nelson, G., Wallis, S. and B. Aarts (2002). Exploring Natural Language. Working
with the British Component of the International Corpus of English.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Newmeyer, E. J. (1998). Language form and language function. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Newmeyer, E. J. (2000). The discrete nature oI syntactic categories. Against a
prototype-based account. In: R. D. Borsley (ed.), 221-250. |also published as
Chapter 4 in Newmeyer (1998)|
Nicol, J. (1995). EIIect oI clausal structure on subject-verb agreement errors. Journal
of Psvcholinguistic Research 24, 507-516.
Nixon, G. and J. Honey (eds) (1988). An historic tongue. Studies in English
linguistics in memorv of Barbara Strang. London: Routledge.
Oostdijk, N. (1991). Corpus linguistics and the automatic analvsis of English.
Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Oostdijk, N. and J. Aarts (1997). Multiple postmodiIication in the English noun
phrase. In: J. Aarts et al. (eds), 107-121.
Osselton, N. (1988). Thematic genitives. In: G. Nixon and J. Honey (eds), 138-144.
Paardekooper, P.C. (1956). Een schat van een kind. De Nieuwe Taalgids 49, 93-99.
Paardekooper, P.C. (1971). Beknopte ABN-syntaksis (4
th
ed.). Den Bosch.
Partee, B. (1972). Opacity, coreIerence, and pronouns. In: D. Davidson and G.
Harman (eds), 415-441.
Payne, J. (1993). The headedness oI noun phrases: slaying the nominal Hydra. In:
G.G. Corbett et al. (eds), 114-139.
Pinker, S. (1999). Words and Rules. New York: basic Books.
Pinker, S. and A. Prince (1988). On language and connectionism: analysis oI a
parallel distributed processing model oI language acquisition. Cognition 28,
73-193.
Poutsma, H. (1914). A grammar of late modern English, Part IA: nouns, adfectives
and articles. Groningen: NoordhoII.
Poutsma, H. (1926). A grammar of late modern English, Part II: the verb and the
particles. Groningen: NoordhoII.
Powers, J. and K. de Jong (eds) (1988/9?). Proceedings of the Fifth Eastern States
Conference on Linguistics. Columbus: the Ohio State University.
Prince, E.E. (1981). Toward a taxonomy oI Given-New inIormation. In: Cole (ed.),
223-255).
Ptz, M. (ed.) (1992). Thirtv vears of linguistic evolution. Studies in honour of Rene
Dirven on the occasion of his sixtieth birthdav. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech and J. Svartvik (1972). A Grammar oI
Contemporary English. London: Longman.
Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech and J. Svartvik (1985). A Comprehensive
Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
RadIord, A. (1988). TransIormational Grammar: a Iirst course. New York: Cambridge
University Press.
RadIord, A. (1993). Head-hunting: on the trail oI the nominal Janus. In: G.G. Corbett
et al. (eds), 73-113.
Rayner, K. and A. Pollatsek (1989). The psvchologv of reading. Englewood CliIIs, NJ:
Prentice hall.
Reed, A. (1988/9?). Semantic groups anmd discourse groups. In: J. Powers and K. de
Jong (eds), 416-427.
Reed, A. (1991). On interpreting partitives. In D.J. Napoli and J.A. Kegl (eds), 207-224.
Reid, W. (1991). Jerb and number agreement in English. London: Longman.
Reinhart, T. (1980). The position oI extraposed clauses. Linguistic Inquirv 11, 621-
624.
Renkema, J. (1987). Tekst en uitleg. een inleiding in de tekstwetenschap. Dordrecht:
Eoris.
Rickheit, G. and H. Strohner (eds) (1985). Inferences in text-processing. Amsterdam:
Elsevier Science (North-Holland).
Riemsdijk, H.C. van (1998). Categorial Ieature magnetism: the endocentricity and
distribution oI projections. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2, 1-
48.
RijkhoII, J. (1990). Explaining word order in the noun phrase. Linguistics 28, 5-42.
Romaine, S. (1998) (ed.). The Cambridge Historv of the English Language, Jol. IJ.
1776-1997. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psvchologv 4, 328-350.
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles oI categorization. In E. Rosch and B.B. Lloyd (eds), 27-
48.
Rosch, E. and C.B. Mervis (1975). Eamily resemblances: Studies in the internal
structure oI categories. Cognitive Psvchologv 7, 573-605.
Rosch, E., C.B. Mervis, W.D. Gray and D.M. Johnson (1976). Basic objects in natural
categories. Cognitive Psvchologv 8, 382-439.
Rosch, E. and B. B. Lloyd (eds) (1978). Cognition and categori:ation. Hillsdale N.J.:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rosenbach, A. (2002). Genitive variation in English. Conceptual factors in
svnchronic and diachronic studies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Ross, John R. (1967). Constraints on variables in svntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Ross, John R. (1973a). A Iake NP squish. In: C-J. Bailey and R. W. Shuy (eds), 96-
140.
Ross, John R. (1973b). Nouniness. In: O. Eujimura (ed.), 137-257.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Toward an interactive model oI reading. In: S. Dornic (ed.),
573-603.
Rumelhart, D.E. (1980). Schemata: the building blocks oI cognition. In: R.J. Spiro et
al. (eds), 33-58.
Rumelhart, D. E. and J.L. McClelland (1986). On learning oI past tenses oI English
verbs. In: J.L. McClelland and D.E. Rumelhart (eds) (1986c), 216-271.
Russell, B. (1903). The principles of mathematics. London: Allen and Unwin.
Russell, B. (1905). On denoting. Mind 14, 479-493.
Russell, B. (1920). Descriptions. In: L. Linsky ed. (1952: 95-108).
SanIord, A.J. and S.C. Garrod (1981). Understanding written language. explorations
of comprehension bevond the sentence. Chichester: Wiley.
Schank, R.C. (1976). The role oI memory in language processing. In: C. N. CoIer
(ed.), 162-189.
Schank, R.C. (1980). Language and memory. Cognitive Science 4, 243-284.
Schank, R.C. (1982a). Representing memory: an artiIicial intelligence perspective. In:
Ullen (ed), 25-63.
Schank, R.C. (1982b). Reminding and memory organization: an introduction to
MOPs. In: W.G. Lehnert and M.H. Ringle (eds), 455-493.
Schank, R.C. and R. Abelson (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding.
Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
SchiIIrin, D., Tannen, D, and H. E. Hamilton (2001). The handbook of discourse
analvsis. OxIord: Blackwell.
Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. (1975), Indirect speech acts. In: P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds), 59-82.
Seidenberg, M.S. and M.C. MacDonald (1999). A probabilistic constraints approach
to language acquisition and processing. Cognitive Science 23, 569-588.
Seidenberg, M.S. and J.L. McClelland (1990). More words but still no lexicon: Reply
to Besner et al. (1990). Psvchological Review 97, 447-452.
Seiler, H. (1983a). Possession as an operational dimension of language. Tbingen:
Narr.
Seiler, H. (1983b). Possessivity, subject and object. Studies in Language 7, 89-117.
Selkirk, E. (1977). Some remarks on noun phrase structure. In: P.W. Culicover et al.,
285-316.
Siewierska, A. (1988). Word order rules. London: Croom Helm.
Singer, H. and R.B. Ruddell (eds) (1985). Theoretical models of reading. Newark:
International Reading Association.
Small, S. Cottrell, G. and M. Tanenhaus (eds) (1988). Lexical ambiguitv resolution.
Palo Alto, CA: Morgan KauIman.
Smolensky, P (1999). Grammar-based connectionist approaches to language.
Cognitive Science 23, 589-613.
Sopher, H. (1971). Apposition. English Studies 52, 401-412.
Sperber, D. and D. Wilson (1986). Relevance. communication and cognition. OxIord:
Blackwell.
Spiro, R.J., Bruce, B.C. and W.E. Brewer (eds) (1980). Theoretical issues in reading
comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Steedman, M (1999). Connectionist sentence processing in perspective. Cognitive
Science 23, 615-634.
Steinberg, D.D. and L.A. Jacobovits (eds) (1971). Semantics. an interdisciplinarv
reader in philosophv, linguistics and psvchologv. Cambridge: CUP.
Stockwell, R.P., Schachter, P. and B. Partee (1973). The mafor svntactic structures of
English. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Strawson, P. (1964). IdentiIying reIerence and truth values. In: D.D. Steinberg and
L.A. Jakobivits (eds) (1971), 86-99.
Tannen, D. (1979). What`s in a Irame? SurIace evidence Ior underlying expectations.
In: R.O. Ereedle (ed.), 137-181.
Taraldsen, T. (1981). The theoretical interpretation oI a class oI marked extractions.
In: A. Belletti et al. (eds), ???
Taylor, J.R. (1991). Possessive genitives in English: a discourse perspective. South
African Journal of Linguistics 9, 59-63.
Taylor, J.R. (1995). Linguistic categori:ation. prototvpes in linguistic theorv. OxIord:
Clarendon Press (1
st
ed. 1989).
Taylor, J.R. (1996). Possessives in English. an exploration in cognitive grammar.
OxIord: Clarendon Press.
Tomlin, R. S. (1986). Basic word order. Functional principles. London: Croom
Helm.
Tomlin, R. S. (1987a). Linguistic reIlections oI cognitive events. In: R. S. Tomlin
(ed.), 455-479.
Tomlin, R. S. (ed.) (1987b). Coherence and grounding in discourse. Amsterdam:
John Benjamins.
Tsou, B. and O. Kwong (eds) (2001). Proceedings of the 15
th
Pacific Asia Conference
on Language, Information and Computation, Hong Kong.
Tyler, A. and V. Evans (2001). Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: the
case oI over. Language 77/4, 724-765.
Tyler, S.A. (1969). Cognitive anthropologv. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Ullen, S. (ed.) (1982). Text processing. Proceedings of Nobel svmposium 51,
Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell.
Van Valin, R.D. (ed.) (1993). Advances in Role and Reference Grammar.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Van Valin, R.D. and R.J. LaPolla (1997). Svntax. structure, meaning and function.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Venneman, T. (1975). Topic, sentence accent and ellipsis: a proposal Ior their Iormal
treatment. In: E.L. Keenan (ed.), 313-328.
Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B. and C. Semenza (1995). Constructing subject-verb
agreement in speech: The role oI semantic and morphological Iactors. Journal
of Memorv and Language 34, 186-215.
Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B. and M.E. Garrett (1996a). Subject-verb agreement in
Spanish and English: the role oI conceptual Iactors. Cognition 61, 261-298.
Vigliocco, G., Hartsuiker, R.J., Jarema, G. and H.H.J. Kolk (1996b). One or more
labels on the bottles? Notional concord in Dutch and Erench. Language and
Cognitive Processes 11, 407-442.
Vigliocco, G. and J. Nicol (1998). Separating hierarchical relations and word oder in
language production: is proximity concord syntactic or linear? Cognition 68,
B13-B29.
Vos, R. (1993). Direct partitive constructions. In: E. Drijkoningen and K. Hengeveld
(eds), 177-188.
Vos, R. (1999). A grammar of partitive constructions. PhD Dissertation, Tilburg
University, Tilburg.
Wallis, S.A., B. Aarts and G. Nelson (1999). Parsing in Reverse exploring ICE-GB
with Euzzy Tree Eragments and ICE-CUP. In: J.M. Kirk (ed.), 355-344.
Wallis S.A., and G. Nelson (2000). Exploiting Iuzzy tree Iragments in parsed corpus
linguistics. Literarv and Linguistic Computing 15, 339-361.
Weinreich, U., W. Labov and M. Herzog (1968). Empirical Ioundations Ior a theory
oI language change. In: W. Lehmann and Y. Malkiel (eds), 97-195.
Wiers, E. (1978). Kleins appositionele constructies`. Spektator 8-1/2, 62-80.
Winston, P.H. (ed.) (1975). The psvchologv of computer vision. New York: McCraw-
Hill Book Company.
Wittenburg, K. (1987). Extraposition Irom NP as anaphora. In: G.J. Huck and A.E.
Ojeda (eds), 428-445.
Zadeh, L. (1965). Euzzy sets. Information and Control 8: 338-353.
Zampolli, A. (ed.) (1977). Linguistic structures processing. Fundamental studies in
computer science 5. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Zandvoort, R.W. (1961). Varia Syntactica. In: Language and Societv. Essavs
presented to Arthur M. Jensen on his seventieth birthdav, 193-203.
Copenhagen: Det Berlingske Bogtrykkeri.
Zwicky, A. (1985). Heads. Journal of Linguistics 21, 1-29.
Zwicky, A. (1993). Heads, bases and Iunctors. In G.G. Corbett et al. (eds), 192-315.