Cosmic rays were detected and analysed using a cloud chamber, by taking various photos of the tracks left by ionisation of the vapour by particles. Identification of those tracks were made and found to have distinguishing features similar to those of muon decay, muon deflections, low energy scattering and high energy photon decay.
1. Introduction
This report investigates the ionised tracks left by cosmic particles which pass through the cloud chamber. However only ionising radiation can be detected as the cloud chamber works on the principle that the particles ionise the super saturated alcohol vapour. The ions then act as condensation nuclei, so that vapour forms a trail of condensed alcohol which is then illumination by an external light source.
The term supersaturation describes a solution which contains more dissolved substance than it would contain under normal conditions. In a cloud chamber, dry ice (normal ice is not cold enough) is used to create a steep temperature gradient, allowing the alcohol to vaporise and saturate the air. Ionisation occurs as the particles contain enough energy to detach electrons from atoms or molecules.
2. Theory
2.1 Cosmic Rays Cosmic rays are particles which shower onto the Earths atmosphere and originate from anywhere beyond our atmosphere. These include any particles coming from the interstellar space, outside our solar system, from solar flares which emit large amounts of energetic nuclei into space towards Earth and also include x-rays and gamma rays.
As these particles enter the Earths atmosphere, they collide with molecules such as oxygen and nitrogen. This produces what can be called an air shower, whereby the collision produces a cascade of lighter particles.
Muons are created by the collisions of cosmic rays (mainly protons) in the upper atmosphere, and this experiment hopes to detect muons and the particles muons decay into. As approximately 10,000 muons reach every square meter of the Earths surface every minute, the possibilities of detected muons in the chamber are relatively high.
2 | P a g e
2.2 Cloud Chamber A cloud chamber is a radioactivity detector. In this experiment cosmic rays enter the chamber and ionise the supersaturated alcohol in the chamber, which leave behind trails of condensed alcohol. This system is ideal for observing cosmic rays, as the system is very sensitive to any changes in temperature, volume and pressure.
The region just above the metal condenser plate is the most sensitive to radioactive tracks. Around this region most of the alcohol is in a gaseous state and on the verge of condensing, meaning it is the optimal region for particles to trigger condensation, hence cloud formation. In this region a layer of precipitation (rain) is observed, due to contamination in the chamber which condenses the vapour. The height of this region can be increased by introducing a steeper temperature gradient, so there is enough vapour to replace the vapour which has been condensed lower down in the chamber.
3. Method
Figure 1: Basic arrangement of a cloud chamber
Throughout this experiment, many readjustments were made to ensure that the cloud chamber remained effective for observing cosmic rays. To prevent too much rain forming in the cloud chamber, measurements on the amount of alcohol were made and recorded. However the required amount varies with the size of the cloud chamber, but roughly sprinkling enough alcohol to soak the felt sheet should suffice. Pure isopropyl alcohol was used.
Another vital condition required to have a functioning cloud chamber, is to keep the chamber completely air tight. Any external air currents or leakages into the chamber will disturb the rain, deform the tracks and prevent the chamber becoming super saturated with alcohol. This was achieved by using silicone sealant, duck tape and rubber lining.
The angle at which the light source is directed at the chamber will also determine whether the chamber will appear to have no rain to being able to observe faint tracks. The best light source will be a uniform beam which casts a bright light across the bottom of the 3 | P a g e
chamber. This could be achieved by using the light from a slide projector.
The metal condenser plate must be in direct contact with the dry ice. This will create the steep temperature gradient (from approximately -50C to 20C) needed within the chamber to enable supersaturation to occur.
Finally the chamber must also be level, as the rain will be observed to flow towards a certain direction, which can disrupt the clarity of the tracks, if it is slanted. Once the system has been left to stand for an estimated 15 minutes, visible tracks will become apparent.
4. Results and Discussion The following photographs of tracks observed in the cloud chamber, have been enhanced to allow for easier observation and identification of possible decaying or deflections of cosmic rays.
Figure 2: Charged High Energy Particle
The photograph shows a very straight ionisation track. This could be the track of any charged high energy particle such as electrons, protons, muons or pions. As these particles carry a significant amount of energy, any interactions with the particles within the chamber will not result in deflection.
Figure 3: Charged Low Energy Particle (left) Diagram of electron scattering particle track (right)
From first observations, this photograph would seem to show a charged low energy particle such as an electron being scattered by other charged particles within the cloud chamber through electrostatic Coulomb forces. However the left side of this track suggests that the electron has decayed, even though this normally only occurs with high energy particles; which should leave straight incident tracks as shown in Figure 2. One possible explanation 4 | P a g e
could be an overlap of separate tracks. However due to the difficulties with capturing clear photos, no solid conclusion can be made on how Figure 3 was formed.
Figure 4: Alpha track (left) Possibly a track falling from upper regions of the cloud chamber(right)
Other observations were made of alpha radiation type tracks. These consisted of very thick and straight tracks, which appear to fall to the bottom of the chamber and dissolve into the precipitate clouds. Some of these tracks may also have been from ionisation higher up in the chamber (in the region where we cannot observe tracks) by cosmic particles. As condensation tracks tend to spread out and become less uniform as they fall towards the bottom.
Figure 5: Muon p decay (left) Common decay of muon (right)
This shows a cosmic particle, possibly a muon p - , decaying into an electron, an electron- antineutrino c and a muon-neutrino
. However in Figure 5 only the electron is visible as
neutrinos do not carry any charge, therefore will not leave ionisation trails in the cloud chamber.
Figure 6: Muon p deflecting off an atomic electron (left) Diagram of collision (right) 5 | P a g e
In Figure 6 it shows a high energy particle, such as a muon p, colliding with an atomic electron (electron within the first orbital shell of an atom). The muon then transfers energy to the electron which jumps out of the outer shell and can be seen ionising the vapour. The muons path is then deflected.
Figure 7: Neutron n 0 (beta) decay (left) Diagram of decay (right)
Just as shown in Figure 6, Figure 7 appears to fork into three branches. An initial explanation could be neutron (beta) decay. Free neutrons n 0 (unstable if outside the nucleus) decay and are converted to a protons p + , and emitted an electron - , an electron antineutrino c . However if the tracks are traced back to a main centre point, one might also suggest that only the top two tracks line up to a common origin. Suggesting Figure 7 may be similar to Figure 6, another high energy particle decaying into two other subatomic particles or similar tracks overlapping one another. Furthermore, electron antineutrinos cannot be detected as they are not charged particles, so Figure 7 cannot have resulted from the decay of a neutron.
Figure 8: Photony decaying into electron - and positron + (left) Diagram of decay (right)
This photograph looks similar to Figure 6, as they both fork off into two branches. However Figure 8 does not show an incident track before it decays, where as Figure 6 does. The reason being that this is the decay of a high energy photon y; which does not carry a charge so can not ionise the vapour. However the photon does decay into an electron - and a positron + , which both carry charges.
5. Errors There was great difficulty when trying to physically identify what particles left the tracks captured in the photographs, with the equipment available to use. One method was to identify particles by introducing materials such as paper or aluminium into the bottom of the cloud chamber, to observe whether they would stop certain particles from passing through. Then by using elimination we could try differentiate between beta and alpha 6 | P a g e
radiation. However, the set up of this was very difficult to carry out and due to reflections and temperature difference of the materials. It was very difficult to observe clear tracks.
Another option was to use a magnetic field to draw the cloud tracks into the sensitive region of the cloud chamber, and possibly observe the curvature of the tracks caused by the magnetic field. However from calculations made, we would require approximately 2.83 tesla for muons or 0.015 tesla for electrons. This would not have been achievable with the equipment available to us.
There were also problems with the sealing procedure. Which meant some of the tracks may have been disrupted by external air currents. Because we had to reuse the same cloud chamber, we could not use silicone sealant but had to rely on duck tape; which would freeze and sometime crack from the cold temperatures. This also reduced the amount of time the cloud chamber could be used effectively.
Furthermore, to capture tracks in photos with enough clarity and correct timing was a huge problem. This could be solved by using a trigger or improving the light source. As the currently halogen light source heated up the perspex sheet it was directed at, and caused the rain to drift towards the warmer regions, and so disrupting the formation of tracks.
Finally, there may be some overlapping of tracks which may give the appearance of decaying subatomic particles. However due to the probability of this being very small, we have assumed that our recorded tracks are not due to the overlapping of separate particle tracks.
6. Conclusion The aim of this report was to observe the tracks left by cosmic rays within a cloud chamber. From analysing the photographs, we can conclude that tracks such as muon decay, muon deflections, low energy scattering and high energy photon decay have been observed in the cloud chamber. However many assumptions had to be made when observing and identifying the tracks; for example assuming that the probability of overlapping tracks is small or that all the ionising radiation came solely from cosmic rays.
To seclude the cloud chamber, so there is no radiation coming from surrounding material would be incredibly difficult, as would be the task of differentiating tracks from different sources of ionising radiation; unless we observed showers. In which case it would be possible to trace the tracks back to a single point in space, and assume it is radiation from surrounding materials.
To further develop this experiment, as mentioned previously, a magnetic field could be used, to help differentiate tracks more effectively and so reducing the need for assumptions. Replacing the halogen light source with one which has a uniform bright beam and using a one time cloud chamber; which could be sealed more effectively. Trying to observe vertical tracks may also be of interest, as this experiment only observes horizontal tracks. This could be done by increasing the sensitive region in the cloud chamber, through increasing the temperature gradient or using cloud chambers of different dimensions. 7 | P a g e