TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE PHILIPPINES RUBRIC FOR LABORATORY PERFORMANCE Subject : ________________________________________ Experiment No : ___________________________________ Group No : ______________________________________ Section

: __________________________________________ Group Members : ________________________________ Instructor : ____________________________________ BEGINNER 1 ACCEPTABLE 2 PROFICIENT 3

CRITERIA I. Laboratory Skills

Manipulative Skills

Members do not demonstrate neededskills

Members occasionally demonstrate needed skills

Members always able to demonstrate needed skills

Experimental Set-up

Members are unable to set-up the materials

Members are able to set- Members are able to setup the materials with up the material with supervision minimum supervision

Process Skills

Member do not demonstrate targeted process skills

Members occasionally demonstrate targeted process skills

Members always demonstrate targeted skills

Safety Precautions II. Work Habits

Members follow safety Members do not follow precautions most of the Members follow safety safety precautions time precautions at all times Members finish ahead of time with complete Members finish on time data and time to revise with incomplete data data

Members do not finish Time Management / on time with Conduct of Experiment incoomplete data

Members do not know their tasks and have no defined responsibilities. Group conflicts have to Cooperative and Teamwork be settled by the teacher

Members have defined responsibilities most of the time. Group conflicts are cooperatively managed most of the time

Members are on tasks and have defined responsibilities at all times. Group conflicts are cooperatively managed at all times.

Clean and orderly workplace with occasional mess during Messy workplace during and afiter the Neatness and Orderliness and after the experiment experiement Members require supervision by the teacher

Clean and orderly workplace at all times during and after the experiment

Ability to do independent work

Members require Members do not need to occassional supervision be supervised by the by the teacher teacher
TOTAL SCORE RATING = (TotalScore) x 100% 24

Other Comments / Observations Evaluated by : ___________________________________________ Printed Name and Signature of Faculty Member

Date : _________________________

__________________ __________________ _______________ SCORE

E (TotalScore) x 100% 24

______________

TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE PHILIPPINES RUBRIC FOR ORAL PRESENTATION Name of Student_________________________________ Section : ___________________________________ Title / Topic : ____________________________________ Subject____________________________________
Outcome : Students will deliver effective oral presentations and demonstrate a command of the English language.

CRITERIA

BEGINNER 1

ACCEPTABLE 2

PROFICIENT 3

Eye Contact

Presenter reads entire report, making no eye contact with audience

Presenter reads most of the report, but occassionally makes eye contact with audience

Presenter maintains eye contact with audience most of the time, but frequently returns to notes

Enthusiam

Shows absolutely no interest in topic presented

Occassionally shows Shows some negativity positive feelings about toward topic presented topic

Delivery

Presenter mumbles, mispronounces terms, and makes serious and persistent grammatical errors throughout presentation. Presenter speaks too softly to be heard by many in the audience

Presenter's voice is relatively clear, but too low to be heard by those in the back of the room. Presenter makes several major grammatical errors, and mispronounces some terms.

Presenter speaks clearly and loud enough to be heard by most of the audience; makes relatively few grammatical errors, and pronounces most terms correctly.

Awareness of Audience

Fails to effectively convince the audience

Clear point of view, but development or Point of view may be support is clear, but lacks inclonclusive and development or support incomplete

Visual Aid

Poor, distracts audience and is hard to Adds nothing to read presentation

Thoughts articulated clearly, but not engaging

Organization

There is no logical sequence of information The content is incomplete and more than three details are not included

Presenter does not follow logical sequence Presenter follows (jumps around the logical sequence but presentation) fails to elaborate The content is complete but one or two details are not included

Content

The content is comprehensive and complete

Time Frame

The presentation is finished exceeding three minutes of due time limit

The presentation id finished exceeding not more than two minute of the time limit

The presentation id finished exceeding not more than one minute of the time limit
TOTAL SCORE RATING = (TotalScore) x 100% 32

Other Comments / Observations

Evaluated by :

___________________________________________ Printed Name and Signature of Faculty Member

Date : _________________________

PHILIPPINES

ATION

________________ _______________

nd demonstrate a command of the

EXEMPLARY 4

SCORE

Presenter seldom returns to notes, maintaining eye contact with audience throughout the presentation.

Strong positive feeling about topic during entire presentation

Presenter speaks clearly and loud enough for all in the audience to hear; makes no grammatical errors, and pronounces all terms correctly and precisely.

Effectively convinces an audience to recognize the valididity of a point of view

Visual aid enhances presentation, all thoughts articulated and keeps interests.

Presenter follows logical sequence and provides explanations / elaboration

The content is very comprehensive and complete in details

The presentation id finished within the time limit

ORE (TotalScore) x 100% 32

RATING =

Date : _________________________

TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE PHILIPPINES RUBRIC FOR RESEARCH PAPER Name of Student_________________________________ Title / Topic : ____________________________________ Section : ___________________________________ Subject____________________________________

Outcome : Students will deliver effective oral presentations and demonstrate a command of the English language.

CRITERIA

BEGINNER 1 There is no clear introduction of main topic and the structure of the paper is missing

ACCEPTABLE 2 The introduction states the main topic but does not adequately preview the structure of the paper

PROFICIENT 3

EXEMPLARY 4 The introduction is engaging, states the main topic and previews the structure of the paper. Clearly and concisely states the paper's purpose in a single sentence, which is engaging, and thought provoking

SCORE

Introduction

The introduction states the main topic and previews the structure of the paper

Purpose

The purpose or argument is generally unclear

The central purpose or argument is not consistently clear throughout the Clearly states the paper's purpose in a paper single sentence

Content

Central purpose or argument is not clearly identified. Analysis is vague or not evident. Reader is confused or may be misinformed

Information supports a central purpose or argument at times. Analysis is basic or general. Reader gains few insights.

Information provides reasonable support for a central purpose or argument and displays evidence of a basic analysis of a significant topic. Reader gains some insights.

Balanced presentation of relevant and legitimate information that clearly supports a central purpose of argument and shows a thoughtful, in-depth analysis of a significant topic. Reader gains important insights

Organization Grammar, Spelling, Writing Mechanics (puntuation, italics, capitalixation, etc.)

The writing is not logically organized. Frequently, ideas fail to make sense together. The reader cannot identify a line of reasoning and loses interest

In general, the writing is arranged logically, although occassionally ideas fail to make sense together. The reader is fairly clear about what writer intends.

The ideas are arranged logically to support the central purpose or argument. They are usually clearly linked to each other. For the most part, the reader can follow the line of reasoning.

The ideas are arranged logically to support the purpose or argument. They flow smoothly from one point to another and are clearly linked to each other. The reader can follow the line of reasoning.

There are so manyerrors that meaning is obscured. The reader is The writing has many errors, and confused and stops reading the reader is distracted by them The tone is unprofessional. It is not The tone is not consistently appropriate for an academic professional or appropriate for an research paper. academic research paper.

There are occassional errors, but they don't represent a major distraction or obscure The writing is free or almost free of meaning errors. The tone is generally professional. For the The tone is consistently professional most part, it is appropriate for an academic and appropriate for academic research research paper. paper.

Tone

Use of References

References are seldom cited to support statetements

Although attributions are occassionally given, many statements seem unsubstantiated. The reader is confused about the source of information and ideas.

Professionally legitimate sources that support claims are generally present and attributions is for the most part, clear and fairly represented.

Compelling evidence from professionally legitimate sources is given to support claims. Attribution is clear and fairly represented

Quality of References

There are no virtually no sources that are professionally reliable. The reader seriously doubts the value of the material and stops reading. Done in the correct format with many errors. Includes 3 major references(e.g. science journal articles, books, but not more than two internet sites.

Most of the references are from sources that are not peer-reviewed and have uncertain reliability. The reader doubts the accuracy of much of the material presented. Done in the correct format with some errors. Includes 4 major references (e.g. science journal articles, books but not more than two internet sites

Although most of the references are professionally legitimate, a few are questionable. The reader is uncertain of the reliability if some of the sources.

References are primarily peerreviewed professional journals or other approved sources. The reader is confident that the information and ideas can be trusted. Done in the correct format with some errors. Includes more than 5 major references (e.g. science journal articles, books but not more than two internet sites

Bibliography

Done in the correct format with some errors. Includes 5 major references (e.g. science journal articles, books but not more than two internet sites

TOTAL SCORE

RATING = Other Comments / Observations

Evaluated by :

(TotalScore) x 100% 36

___________________________________________ Printed Name and Signature of Faculty Member

Date : _________________________

RUBRIC FOR REFLECTION PAPER / Name of Student_________________________________ Title / Topic : ____________________________________ Outcome : Students will write reflection paper / essay which is logically organized, have a demonstrates a command of the practice of effective writing. BEGINNER 1

CRITERIA

Focus on Assigned Topic

No attempt has been made to relate the essay to the assigned topic

Little or no explanation or reflection on learning, no or Reflection of Personal Learning few details to support reflection Many grammatical spelling, or punctuation errors

Mechanics

Organization

Ideas seem to be randomly arranged. No effort at paragraph organization

Conclusion

Incomplete and/or unfocused

Other Comments / Observations Evaluated by :

___________________________________________ Printed Name and Signature of Faculty Member

RUBRIC FOR REFLECTION PAPER / ESSAY Section : ___________________________________ Subject____________________________________

ssay which is logically organized, have a clear sence of purpose and ractice of effective writing. ACCEPTABLE 2 PROFICIENT 3

Most of the essay is related to Some of the essay is related to the assigned topic. The essay the assigned topic, but a wanders off at one point, but reader does not learn much the reader can still learn about the topic soemthing about the topic

Does not go deeply into the reflection of learning, generalizations and limited insight, uses some detail. A few grammatical spelling, or punctuation errors. The essay is a little hard to follow. Paragraphs are unclear. The transitions are sometimes not clear. The conclusion does not adequately restaten the learning

Relates learning with research and project, personal and general reflections included, uses concrete language

Almost no grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

The essay is pretty well organized. One idea may seem out of place. Clear transitions are used. The conclusion restates the learning

TOTAL SCORE

RATING

(TotalScore) x 100% 20

Date : _________________________

urpose and

EXEMPLARY 4

SCORE

Entire essay is related to the assigned topic and allows the reader to understand much more about the topic Shows great depth of knowledge and learning, reveals feelings and thoughts, abstract ideas reflected through use of specific details No grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The essay is very well organized. One idea or scene follows another in a logical sequence with clear transitions The conclusion is engaging and restates personal learning.

TING

(TotalScore) x 100% 20