Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Ready, Aim, Coach: How HR Can (and Should) Coach Managers on Problem Employee Behaviors
Putting Success Back in Succession Planning: The Role of Learning and Development
Passing the Torch: 5 Steps for Turning the Baby Boomer Brain Drain into a Brain Trust
A message from the President and Associate Dean of Executive Development at UNC Kenan-Flagler Business School
About ideas@work
Greetings from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and welcome to the first edition of ideas@work, a new journal designed specifically for business leaders who are involved and interested in talent development issues. Here at UNC Executive Development, we partner with organizations to help them solve real business challenges while developing their top talent. Our approach to program design and delivery draws upon the power of realworld, applicable experiences from our faculty and staff, integrated with the knowledge our client partners share about the challenges they face. ideas@work was created to share some of the ideas and experiences weve gained from working with our partners, and to highlight best practices from other organizations. This issue includes five papers covering a variety of topics which I hope youll find to be interesting and thoughtprovoking. One paper offers suggestions to help you measure and demonstrate the value of learning and development. Another addresses the importance of succession planning and includes suggestions to identify and develop talent to fill key leadership positions. A third paper tackles the challenges caused by a rapidly aging workforce with tips to leverage valuable knowledge and experience before the baby boomer generation starts to retire. I sincerely hope that youll find some useful, actionable ideas that you can apply in your own organization, and I encourage you to share ideas@work with your peers and colleagues as you see fit. Our goal is to feature topics that are relevant to you, so please feel free to email me any ideas that you have for future topics at unc_exec@unc.edu. Thank you for your interest in UNC Executive Development. Warm regards,
Consistently ranked one of the worlds best business schools, UNCs KenanFlagler Business School is known for experiential learning and teamwork, superior teaching, innovative research and a collaborative culture.
Our commitment to developing socially responsible, results-driven leaders distinguishes our programs. We educate people at every stage of their careers and prepare them to manage successfully in the global business environment.
At UNC Executive Development, we believe that managing employee talent is vital to the success of any organization, and we provide unique learning and development experiences for our partners.
www.uncexec.com
Making the Business Case for Learning and Development: 5 Steps for Success
page 4
Ready, Aim, Coach: How HR Can (and Should) Coach Managers on Problem Employee Behaviors
page 16
Putting Success Back in Succession Planning: The Role of Learning and Development
page 26
Passing the Torch: 5 Steps for Turning the Baby Boomer Brain Drain into a Brain Trust
page 38
(Note: The information or conclusions expressed in the following white papers are the authors review of findings expressed by the organizations. All brand representations are registered trademarks owned by the respective companies or organizations.)
Making the Business Case for Learning and Development: 5 Steps for Success
Susan N. Palmer, Ph.D Program Director UNC Executive Development
Introduction
Human resource and talent management professionals can turn todays economic challenges into opportunity and become true strategic partners by creating strong business cases for their learning and development initiatives. To do so, HR can no longer measure the return on investment (ROI) of learning and development after the programs have been implemented. Instead, they should calculate and anticipate the returns these initiatives will have on their organizations bottom line. This white paper explores how organizations can retool their learning and development programs to reflect how they should be doing business and provides steps you can make to show your CEO and CFO the top and bottom-line value and the ROI of learning and development initiatives. With the proper focus and understanding of how learning and development programs contribute to corporate profits, spending on training and development will be viewed as an investment with the potential for strong returns rather than as a disposable business cost.
Our Promise
This white paper draws lessons from our work with a range of organizations. It outlines steps you and other learning and development leaders can take to show your CEO and CFO the top and bottom-line value and the ROI of learning and development initiatives. These steps can change your own and your senior managements perception of learning and development programs and of the value these programs provide to the organization: 1. Know your organizations strategic priorities. 2. Understand how the learning and development function can contribute to those priorities. 3. Determine what learning and development programs will support the organizations strategic direction. 4. Build it with metrics. 5. Pitch it like youre the CFO. With the proper focus and understanding, you can have leaders view training and development as a worthy investment instead of as a cost.
www.uncexec.com
Learning and development professionals who can show how their organizations top and bottom lines ultimately improve from investing in training and development will grab the attention of senior management and quickly become a valued strategic business partner.
Example:
Top management at Duke Energy understands the value of long-term planning. At a time when most organizations slashed their training budgets, Duke Energy actually increased its spending on leadership development. In 2008, the company launched the Strategic Leadership Program, intended to develop the next generation of leaders to be more strategic and less tactical in their thinking and actions. The two-week program focused on developing the leadership skills of mid-level managers. Participants learned how to evaluate business decisions, how to execute business strategies, and then how to put the theory to practice: It started with in-depth sessions on understanding the industry and the business. D uring the first week, participants identified actual business challenges in their own business units and then developed solutions to address these challenges. D uring the second week, they worked on emerging company challenges identified by the senior executives.
The challenges had measurable bottom-line impact for the organization, and they piqued the interest and generated ongoing support of senior management.
According to a recent Bersin & Associates survey, corporate learning and development budgets were cut by 11 percent in 2009, and by a total of 22 percent since 2008.
ource: OLeonard, K. (2010). The Corporate Learning Factbook: Benchmarks, Trends S and Analysis of the U.S. Training. Oakland, CA: Bersin & Associates
www.uncexec.com
Two Examples
For example, if your organization plans to expand its business internationally within the next several years, determine how the training and development function can support this goal. Will current employees need to do work overseas? If so, then evaluate the training that employees will need to succeed in these new business environments. Will the organization need to hire new employees in other countries? If so, then careful thought should be given to the training needs of these employees, as well as to how to deliver the training efficiently and effectively overseas. Also, understand how those employees who do not work overseas will support the strategic objectives and develop training programs that align with those global priorities. The impact of training and development on a strategic priority, such as expanding globally, can be multilayered, so it pays to think outside of the box. Providing a clear picture of how work will change and preparing employees for these changes can be an invaluable contribution. Knowing what learning and development opportunities are needed to help employees adjust to new or changed roles can offer great results and pay back.
Once senior leadership understands that your focus is the same as theirs, it leads to better support to obtain your goals.
Lori Antieau Vice President, Human Resources Talecris Biotherapeutics
Example:
Caterpillar, the worlds leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment, diesel and natural gas engines, and industrial gas turbines, has done exactly this. Caterpillar has hundreds of locations worldwide to serve and support their customer base and to respond quickly to their needs. Jose (Pepe) Brousset, regional director for Americas South at Caterpillar, focuses on how Caterpillar can maintain its leadership in the industry. According to Brousset, While we continue to invest in the differentiation of our products, we recognize that we need to change the (85 year-old) organization to become much more customercentric. We need to understand, really, the solutions that our customers are seeking. Our talent development efforts are designed to drive this organizational change; to become more customer-centric, starting with top leadership and continuing down through the operating managers. In this way, were able to transform the organization and impact the bottom line.
www.uncexec.com
To be successful, talent development needs to start with the leadership; they need to be committed to driving the culture change down through the organization. They also need to empower their managers and provide support. From there, it will cascade through the organization. At the operating manager level, our talent development efforts are designed to provide the training and tools to enable organizational change. We help our executives throughout the organization see their roles in supporting this strategy so they will better understand how their contribution drives results. As a result, we have a direct impact on market performance by imparting knowledge that drives the behaviors which will change attitudes.
79
of CEOs who responded in a recent PricewaterhouseCoopers survey said they intend to increase focus and investment on how to manage people through change. This includes redefining employee roles within their organizations.
79
of CEOs in that same survey said they want to change their strategy for managing talent.
68
said they intend to increase investment in leadership and talent development as a result of the global recession, suggesting that existing people practices did not support businesses when the global recession hit.
Source: PwC Saratoga (2010). Managing People in a Changing World: Key Trends in Human Capital. PricewaterhouseCoopers
Example:
According to a recent McKinsey Quarterly report (July 2010), officials with the Boys and Girls Clubs of America (BGCA) analyzed and created a set of metrics when developing a leadership training program for more than 650 volunteers. In 2007, BGCA management realized that an anticipated wave of retirements among local club leaders would leave them with a severe leadership shortage. With the changing demographics, this leadership gap is a consistent theme seen today in many for-profit and non-profit organizations. BGCA management also found themselves in a situation not uncommon among non-profit organizations; donors preferred that their money go directly to those in need and not to overhead costs like training and development. BGCA quickly understood they would have to make the business case for the leadership training at the outset and ensure that they could demonstrate how the training would pay for itself. First, BGCA officials narrowed the focus of its leadership training down from 50 to 4 key aspects. They accomplished this goal by analyzing which leadership traits contributed the most to job performance. By designing a program based on leadership aspects tied directly to performance, BGCA officials found that developing metrics and assessing the success of the program was straightforward and tied directly to the associations strategic priorities. BGCA compared the pre- and post-training results of leaders who completed the training program. The BGCA officials also gathered benchmarking data from a control set of member organizations that had similar characteristics, such as budget size and operating revenue; however, the leaders in the control group did not receive the training. The results for leaders who participated in the training programs were markedly better than leaders in the control group on every outcome measured.
10
www.uncexec.com
Boys & Girls Clubs of America (BGCA) training attendees performance before and after training
Difference between performance gains of highest-quartile training participants1 and average ones, 2009 vs 2007 Values in percentage points. Mission metric: Increase in club membership Financial metric: Increase in total revenue raised Mission metric: Increase in % of members with club tenure of 2 years or more
1
Officials estimated that if all 1,100 member organizations matched the success level of the groups whose leaders participated in the training programs, then the BGCA would have added 350,000 new members and increased revenue across all its organizations by $100 millionor approximately a 3 percent increase in the average local organizations budget.
Estimated impact of Boys & Girls Clubs of America (BGCA) training program
Impact of advancedleadership program on revenues, $ million Increase, 20082009 30-35 Future annual increase 15-20
Source: BGCA; McKinsey analysis
Cost of advancedleadership program, $ million All-in cost, 20072009 7.3 Future annual cost 2.5
4-5X
6-8X
The BGCA officials also calculated that the training programs generated more than four times the return on the programs costincluding the cost of time and travel for all the participants.
11
Example:
Duke Energy also measures the success of its leadership program, but takes a venture capitalist view; if just one of the business plans generated from the program comes to fruition, the cost savings to the organization or the increase in revenue will pay for the program and more. This is a lesson we can all be reminded of: Dont be afraid to think unconventionally. According to Atul Nerkar, associate professor of strategy and entrepreneurship at the University of North Carolinas Kenan-Flagler Business School, who was involved in the development of the Duke Energy program, We wanted activities that lead to either cost savings or an increase in revenues. We wanted to show where [the program] impacts the top and bottom lines. This is a unique approach which we believe helps make the program pay for itself. According to Mark Short, managing director of organizational development at Duke Energy, this venture capitalist approach to its leadership program has paid off. We wanted to create an environment of innovation and empowerment; an environment where our leadership talent is encouraged to think outside of the box when seeking solutions, and they feel safe in pushing those solutions forward. The impact from the program has been tremendous, both culturally and on the bottom line. You know the program has made an impact when every new participant in the program knows the successes of the preceding class, and they all strive to top.
Getting a seat at the table is imperative; however, you have to be a respected voice at the table or you are doing nothing more than keeping the chair warm. Business is the key word, not the kumbaya-hold-hands-and-sing-the-praises-of-people approach. Business means putting your numbers up and presenting your viewpoint or proposal from a quantitative instead of a qualitative approach.
Carrie Alden, SPHR-CA Human Resources Manager Sierra Nevada Brewing Co.
12
www.uncexec.com
Talent management professionals must be prepared to develop specific measurements for each program.
Your Assignment
This will require you to shelve your HR or training and development role for a while and start thinking about how your job and your department create organizational value. While HR professionals stress the need to get senior management support for training and development programs, it is unlikely that they will get or maintain this support without being able to demonstrate the effect on the organizations key performance metrics. At the end of the day, training and development programs should not be seen by the CEO or CFO as a cost, but rather as an investment in the organizations human assets. An investment that you can demonstrate has a real, positive top and/or bottom-line impact. In most cases, other departments or divisions within organizations have been doing this for years. Marketing and operations directors normally can make strong business cases and have measures in place to show how their functions and programs directly affect the organizations bottom line. CFOs are not likely to support what appear to be disposable costs which offer no measurable positive impact to corporate profitsespecially in tough economic times when resources are limited. However, a positive return on a cash outlay will elicit a completely different response from most finance officers.
We have aligned our HR efforts more closely with the business strategy. Although there was some resistance from managers at the beginning, early and frequent communication and involvement of staff and managers in the development of new, more effective talent management processes has substantially reduced the resistance to change.
Milton E. Barrios Assistant Senior Personnel Manager International Monetary Fund
13
The challenge that many learning and development professionals face is calculating the return from what some call a soft set of measures. A basic rule of capital budgeting is to only fund investments where the net present value is positive; the challenge to HR and learning and development managers is how to calculate the real value that training and development programs add to the bottom line, said Robert A. Connolly, associate professor of finance at the University of North Carolinas Kenan-Flagler Business School. Since HR and learning and development projects generate human capital, change management processes, affect job satisfaction and have a direct impact on other hard-to-measure outcomes, these types of investments tend to be much more difficult but not impossible to quantify, Connolly says. For example, how might one measure the impact of a cross-cultural training program for a business
planning to enter the international market? Many times organizations tend to chalk up such a training exercise as a direct but necessary cost. However, even a training program which appears to support a soft set of skills can have a hard and measurable impact on corporate profits by improving external and internal customer satisfaction. This satisfaction can be measured through customer or client retention, which in turn can directly affect corporate profits and costs savings.
The challenge that many learning and development professionals face is calculating the return from what some call a soft set of measures.
Conclusion
An organizations financial officer will be much more likely to fund learning and development proposals that project a return on the initial investment. Metrics such as customer retention and the positive impact repeat customers have on the bottom line can be ways to illustrate the efficacy of a learning and development program. The trick is learning to use a financial perspective to view the possible outcomes of learning and development programs and then apply the appropriate metrics to project the possible returns. As most any financial professional will tell you, its not an exact science. No one can predict the future with 100 percent accuracy, so cost and return projections which provide best and worst-case scenarios and the probabilities of success are what CFOs think about and want to see. Simply put, do your homework. And if that homework clearly shows how learning and development programs offer a strong return on investment on the organizations performance metrics that matter, then a business will be much more likely to provide the resources. Its a formula for success that many top organizations (both profit and not-for-profit) are now using.
OLeonard, K. (2010). The Corporate Learning Factbook: Benchmarks, Trends and Analysis of the U.S. Training . Oakland, CA: Bersin & Associates.
PwC Saratoga (2010). Managing People in a Changing World: Key Trends in Human Capital. PriceWaterhouseCoopers.
14
www.uncexec.com
If youre ready to
take the next step in your career, make a quick trip back to the classroom first.
E X E C U T I V E
D E V E L O P M E N T
I N S T I T U T E
At UNCs Executive Development Institute, youll gain the core knowledge of an MBA program without the long-term time commitment. Youll also learn how to view the business world from a senior executives perspective. And youll develop the key leadership characteristics that lead to effective strategic performance. The result? In two weeks, youll be fully prepared for that next step.
UNC EXECUTIVE DEVELOPMENT
15
Ready, Aim, Coach: How HR Can (and Should) Coach Managers on Problem Employee Behaviors
Melodie Howard Program Director UNC Executive Development
A Common Problem
Weve all been there. Its Monday morning. Youve had a good weekend and arrive in the office ready for a new week. Carol had a good weekend too. She had plenty of time to mull over the situation with her direct report, Joe. Hes good at what he doesreally good. But Joe has to go. Hes a thorn in her side and is lowering morale in the IT department. She cant wait to share her news with you and walks into your office shortly after you arrive. Its time, she announces, that you fire Joe.
16
www.uncexec.com
Introduction
Problem employees are the bane of everyones existence in an organization. They cause productivity to plummet and damage morale. Because few people enjoy conflict, managers often go to extremes to avoid addressing the problem behavior. It seems inevitable that it winds up in the HR department. Unfortunately, by the time it does, the damage has already been done and the clean-up can take months. This white paper will show HR and talent managers how to use coaching skills to help managers handle problem employee behavior and reduce the workplace costs associated with problem employees.
According to one 2004 study, executive coaching at Booz Allen Hamilton returned $7.90 for every dollar the business consulting firm spent on coaching.
17
1. Technician-Turned-Managers:
Their high proficiency in their technical areas of expertise (e.g., IT, Finance, R&D) probably led them to be promoted into a management position. Unfortunately, what made them great technicians may not match the skills they need as a manager. They are used to doing their work as individual contributors and are unclear on how to get work done through others. They earn a reputation of being a micromanager because they cannot delegate and are often heard saying that they cant get anything done because of all these people showing up at my door and asking questions. Because their previous roles were so insular and their expertise so specialized, they are ill-equipped for managing others and being more extroverted.
2. The Oblivious:
This category includes any and all permutations of a lack of self-awareness. These employees are generally unaware of their surroundings or themselves and as a result, clash with others in the workplace. These are the employees who think they are better, smarter, more productive than everyone else. They simply dont understand that their behavior is disruptive to co-workers or why others react to them in such an exaggerated manner (Im just a straightforward type guy. Its not my problem that they cant handle the truth.). This category includes employees who dont show up in appropriate ways; the senior leader who has no executive presence or the customer service supervisor who uses inappropriate speech.
3. Naysayers:
These employees generally have bad attitudes or an underdeveloped ability to solve problems. If there is a challenge at hand, they tend to add to it. They can give you all the reasons it wont work, but seldom offer a solution. They are constant kvetchers who tend to bring the entire units morale down a few notches. Beware of the cheerful naysayersthe ones whose discouraging comments are delivered with a cheerful smile or sotto voce. They are likely to express their disapproval outside the meeting versus directly in the meeting.
18
www.uncexec.com
It is important to note that these categories are not mutually exclusive. It is entirely possible to have an employee or manager who is an oblivious naysayer with a bad attitude. However, all of these categories can offer coachable moments that can lead to real behavioral improvement.
4. People Pleasers:
Believe it or not, people pleasers can get in the way of employee morale and productivity. These people are incapable of saying no and because of that, they tend to feel and act overwhelmed and victimized. Their inclination to over-promise and under-deliver earns them a reputation of being untrustworthy. People pleasers are frequently fence sitters. They are the leaders who cant or wont make a decision for fear of upsetting people. Their inability to make decisions can leave subordinates feeling frustrated, confused and stressed out.
5. The Passive-Aggressive:
Passive-aggressive employees avoid addressing problems at all costs but can inflame them by stirring the pot with negativity or innuendo. Like naysayers, they prefer to stir the pot outside of meetings.
6. Poor Communicators:
We all know how critical good communication is to organizational success, but few employees are actually trained in what good communication is. Bad communicators either fail to pass on critical information, fail to do so effectively, or do so in a manner that is perceived as ineffectual or abrasive.
7. Credit Hogs:
Credit hogs may be the antithesis of the oblivious employee. They are absolutely aware of themselves and others and are quick to use others to raise themselves up. They tend to claim credit for everything and share credit for nothing. They are corporate climbers in the worst sense of the term.
8. Volatiles:
These are the tightly wound, overly emotional and unpredictable employees. They can be bullies or simply highly unpleasant to work with.
19
The Un-Manageables
Unfortunately, there are some problem behaviors that are simply un-manageable. In most cases, these behaviors lead to termination of employment.
Incompetents:
These employees are simply bad hires who cannot meet the requirements of the job.
One-trick ponies:
One-trick ponies have been extremely successful at something but cant or wont learn something new as job requirements and company demands shift and change.
Liars/cheaters:
Liars and cheaters are fundamentally flawed individuals who will break an organizations code of ethics and perhaps even the law to get ahead.
20
www.uncexec.com
21
22
www.uncexec.com
Step 4: Show the Manager How to Create a Contract with the Employee
The meeting with the employee to address the problem behavior will no doubt be emotional for both parties, and it may be easy to forget some of the desired outcomes and timeframes agreed to during the meeting. The manager should put this all in writing to help the employee and to establish a good legacy for future managers regarding the employees development. Unfortunately, for many managers, writing is a stumbling block. Remember the introverted number cruncher? He hates to write and has never heard of the term behavioral descriptors. Its all HR speak to him. Hes going to need some more coaching to learn how to effectively document the discussion. Coach him in how good behavioral descriptors provide detail on the problem behavior, including instances when it occurred, and a recommendation on how to effectively address it. Bad behavioral descriptors (You are just not a team player. You are rude in meetings. You are too negative.) fail to provide the employee context and a solution. Good behavioral descriptors (When bringing concerns forward about project implementation, you focus on what will not work. In the future, Id like for you to focus on bringing some positive aspects or potential solutions to these issues as well as your concerns.) will help the employee identify when the behavior likely occurs and how to effectively address it.
23
Bergman, A. (2009, July 30). It Pays to Be Nice: Rudeness in the Workplace Comes with a Hefty Price Tag. Newswise. Retrieved February 17, 2011 from www.newswise.com/articles/view/554773.
HBS Press Book (2006, November 23). Coaching People: Pocket Mentor Series. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Porath, C. & Pearson, C. (2009). The Cost of Bad Behavior: How Incivility Is Damaging Your Business and What to Do About It. London: Portfolio Hardcover.
SHRM (2010, December 23). Managing Difficult Employees and Disruptive Behaviors. SHRM Online. Retrieved February 15, 2011 from www.shrm.org.
24
www.uncexec.com
Now more than ever, senior HR leaders need the knowledge, skills and experience to respond to emerging trends that are shaping the future of global business. Offered in partnership with the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), UNCs Business and Human Resources program is designed to equip senior HR leaders with the most up-to-date business knowledge and skills needed to succeed in the rapidly changing business environment today and tomorrow. To learn more, visit www.bhr.uncexec.com.
UNC EXECUTIVE DEVELOPMENT
25
Putting Success Back in Succession Planning: The Role of Learning and Development
David Leonard, Ph.D Program Director UNC Executive Development
Promise
Do you believe that your organization is developing the talent it needs to reach business objectives and meet future challenges? If not, you are not alone. This white paper will show you how successful succession plans are more than filling out forms. They are real, living programs that combine learning and development opportunities and experiential learning to prepare leaders at all levels for tomorrows business challenges. If you, as a learning and development professional, dont have succession planning on your radar, you should. A recent Towers Watson survey found that similar to the 2001 recession and recovery, high performers plan to jump ship as soon as the economy and job market revives. The same survey found that employee engagement has dropped nearly 10 percent since 2008 and approximately 25 percent for high performers.
Introduction
After nearly two years of economic gloom, there is some good news these days. According to the National Bureau of Economic Research, the worlds worst recession in 70 years ended in June 2009. Most experts agree that the recovery will be slow and arduous, but if history is any indication, talent management and learning and development professionals must start planning now to staunch the anticipated loss of their organizations top talent.
L ess than half of all organizations have succession plans at any level. Among those that do have them, the plans are likely to be at the department director level and above, ignoring leaders at lower levels. 3 7% of succession candidates fail. A bout half of all organizations have a process in place to identify high potential leaders, but less than two in five have a program to accelerate their development.
Source: Howard & Wellins, 2008
26
www.uncexec.com
Today, most employers are more concerned about retaining their top performers and skilled employees than before the economic crisis of 2007 and 2008 began (Towers Watson, 2009). Another issue organizations must factor into their succession-planning equation is the imminent retirement of baby boomers. In a 2009/2010 report on trends in executive development by Executive Development Associates (EDA), respondents named the lack of bench strength as the second most influential factor in executive development for the next two to three years, primarily because of the expected number of baby boomers who are set to retire as the economy recovers (Hagemann & Chartrand, 2009). If you combine all these factors, this can add up to a huge opportunity for learning and development professionals who are in a unique position to shape learning programs that develop leadership skills and identify employees potential leadership abilities.
Employee engagement and leadership development work hand-in-hand. Research has shown that employers with the most engaged and satisfied workers are those who provide their employees with meaningful learning and development opportunities. Learning and development specialists who understand how leader development programs can merge with and support succession planning will be in the position to shape and direct the future success of their organizations. Adequate succession plans identify high potential employees who will assume key leadership roles left vacant by departures or retirement. Successful plans not only prepare employees for those roles but also prepare them to meet the challenges of tomorrows workplace. Learning and development professionals have a crucial role in these processes and in putting success back in an organizations succession planning process.
The Impact of an Integrated Approach to Talent Management Companies that Take an Integrated Approach to Reward and Talent Management Are
Less Likely
to experience problems attracting critical-skill employees
Less Likely
to report having trouble retaining top-performing employees
Less Likely
to report having trouble retaining critical-skill employees
More Likely
to be highperforming organizations
27
28
www.uncexec.com
75
Of Employers
said that increasing leadership bench strength was a priority.
69
Of Employers
said that accelerating the development of high potential employees was a high priority for their organizations.
29
The mid-level leader group participates in a shortened version of the senior-leader program, with the content and learning methods tailored to the challenges mid-level leaders encounter on a daily basis. The front-line managers participate in a four-day program that focuses on implementing change, team effectiveness and constructive conflict.
Where and How Is Talent Identified In Your Organization? Employee Segments Considered Talent
Senior leadership Those with leadership potential at mid-level High performers Key contributors / technical experts Those in roles critical to delivering the business strategy Those with skills in short supply and high demand The entire workforce 36% 42% 46% 49% 58% 62% 66%
30
www.uncexec.com
3M keeps their business strategy in mind when planning their leadership development activities. Business strategy plays the central role, according to Sandra Tokach, Ph.D., Vice President of HR at 3M. Without the strategic direction or without understanding the strategic direction, its hard to discuss succession planning. (SHRM Foundation, 2008).
What Are Your Talent Development Priorities? Talent Management Priorities Over the Next 18 Months
High Priority Medium Priority Low/No Priority
66%
Recognizing exceptional performers
27%
7%
57%
Performance management
36%
7%
55%
Assessing/developing senior leaders
37%
8%
55%
Strengthening the talent pipeline and succession management
33%
12%
54%
Training managers
35%
11%
42%
Measuring/increasing employee engagement
41%
17%
42%
Deploying key talent across roles/functions/regions
35%
23%
41%
Mentoring of key talent
43%
16%
38%
Identifying and integrating competencies
39%
23%
30%
Career pathing and planning
39%
31%
25%
Onboarding
45%
30%
24%
Developing/implementing an employee value proposition
44%
32%
14%
45%
41%
Source: Towers Watson, Managing Talent in Tough Times: A Tipping Point for Talent Management? (2009, October)
31
32
www.uncexec.com
Those with skills in short supply and high demand 55 High performers 38 Those with leadership potential at mid-level 29 Key contributors/technical experts 28 Those with leadership potential at an entry level 25 Those in roles critical to delivering the business strategy 2323 Senior leadership 13 13 The entire workforce 5 5 41 54 27 61 47 30 45 30 51 21 40 31 47 15 35 10
Source: Towers Watson, Managing Talent in Tough Times: A Tipping Point for Talent Management? (2009, October)
33
We see the hesitancy many talent management professionals have about having a conversation with their CEO or other senior leaders. It really doesnt have to be difficult.
Keri Bennington, Account Director UNC Executive Development
34
www.uncexec.com
Talk About It
Should employees know theyve been identified as key players in a succession plan? Some business leaders believe that it can be detrimental to do so, potentially pigeonholing employees into certain roles or responsibilities. Others believe it can discourage other high-potential workers to apply for promotions or to learn new job skills, or worse, it can lead employees to believe that a particular promotion is guaranteed. The answer and solution to this issue is not as clearcut as you might hope. Much of the communication of succession plans can depend on corporate culture. More and more employers are choosing to let people know they have been identified as one of several employees selected for a particular role, simultaneously communicating to workers that their leadership skills have been identified and valuedbut that the future position is in no way ensured. The key is to let employees know that their skills and experience are highly valued and needed. Employees who feel underappreciated and unvalued tend to be the most dissatisfied in their jobs and more likely to move on to other organizations when opportunity knocks. Providing the opportunities to develop leadership and work skills is the most effective way for a business to demonstrate that it values employees talent and leadership potential. Research has shown repeatedly that the most engaged and satisfied employees are those who feel their employers offer them opportunities to grow and develop their work and leadership skills. There is more to communication, however, than letting employees know they have been identified in a succession plan. A successful succession plan must encourage communication among executives and managers at all levels. Top-level executives should be clear about the type of talent and leaders the organization wants and needs, while lower-level managers should feel comfortable identifying potential leaders and discussing leadership potentials with their bosses. Clear two-way communication and understanding how to best use communication channels not only will support the success of a succession plan, it also can be an excellent indicator of leadership potential. Learning and development professionals should be keenly aware of this fact and use it to their advantage in demonstrating the value that leadership development programs add to succession planning.
35
Other metrics can include productivity, innovation and employee engagement. Improved productivity can be one of the easiest measures to track, while innovation and engagement are often called more soft measures. However, by tracking sources of improved productivity through employee satisfaction and improved processes (innovation), organizations can get a clear picture of how well a leadership development program is working and aligning with their strategic business goals. Reporting and communicating these successes in a manner that clearly shows the bottom-line value of succession plans and leadership development will strengthen the buy-in factor from top-level executives and help ensure the success of your organizations succession plans and leadership bench strength for years to come.
Nearly half of human resource executives responding to a 2010 Society for Human Resource Management poll said the biggest investment challenge facing their organizations over the next 10 years was obtaining human capital and optimizing human capital investments.
Hagemann, B. & Chartrand, J. (2009). 2009|2010 Trends in Executive Development: A Benchmark Report. Oklahoma City, OK: Executive Development Associates. Howard, A. & Wellins, R. (2008). Global Leadership Forecast 2008|2009. Bridgeville, PA: Development Dimensions International. Minton-Eversole, T. (2010, June 21). Most Companies Unprepared for CEO Succession. Alexandria, VA: SHRM Online.
Palmer, S. (2010). Making the Business Case for Learning and Development: 5 Steps for Success. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina, Kenan Flagler School of Business. SHRM Foundation. (2008). Seeing Forward: Succession Planning at 3M. Retrieved in September 2010 at http://www.shrm. org/about/foundation/products/Pages/ SeeingForwardDVD.aspx.
SHRM Online. (2007). Succession Planning: Tie Talent Needs to Current, Future Org Direction. Retrieved in September 2010 at http://www. shrm.org/hrdisciplines/staffingmanagement/ Articles/Pages/CMS_016356.aspx. Society for Human Resource Management. (2010). SHRM Poll: Challenges Facing Organizations and HR in the Next Ten Years. Alexandria, VA: SHRM.
Towers Watson. (2010). Five Rules for Talent Management in the New Economy. New York, NY: Towers Watson. Towers Waston. (2009, October). Managing Talent in Tough Times: A Tipping Point for Talent Management? New York, NY: Towers Watson.
36
www.uncexec.com
We help you
Businesses today face many distinctive challenges. We listen to your needs and develop a thorough understanding of your business and industry. Then we create unique executive learning experiences designed to develop your executives as they address and overcome these challenges. Multi-tasking at its best.
UNC EXECUTIVE DEVELOPMENT
37
Passing the Torch: 5 Steps for Turning the Baby Boomer Brain Drain into a Brain Trust
Kip Kelly Director of Marketing UNC Executive Development
Promise
As aging baby boomers reach retirement age over the next two decades, many organizations face a potential mass exodus of their senior leaders. While the economic downturn may have delayed retirement for many baby boomers, these valued employees will retire eventually, taking with them a lifetime of knowledge and skills that are difficult, if not impossible, to replace. This paper discusses the five steps you should take now to avoid the baby boomer brain drain and create a brain trust.
Introduction
The statistics of an aging workforce tell the story. As of January 1, 2011, a baby boomer turns 65 every eight seconds -over 7,000 per day. While many may delay retirement for financial and personal reasons, employers are worriedand rightfully sothat they will face a shortage of experienced workers over the next five years. A recent Ernst and Young survey of Fortune 1000 companies found that 62 percent of employers believe future retirements will result in a labor shortage (Johnson, 2010). With every passing year there will be fewer workers with the knowledge and experience to lead effectively. For some industries like health care, energy and construction,
38
www.uncexec.com
PA S S I N G T H E T O R C H : B R A I N D R A I N T O B R A I N T R U S T
this talent gap is already acutely felt (Davis, 2008). Few industries, however, will be unaffected. Research indicates that employers are unprepared for the inevitable departure of these workers: A Sloan Center on Aging and Work survey found that 68 percent of employers had not analyzed the demographics of their workforce and that 77 percent had not analyzed the projected retirement rates of their employees (Pitt-Catsouphes, 2009). A series of AARP surveys found that few employers (between 19 and 37 percent) had taken active steps to prepare for baby boomer retirements (Johnson, 2010).
The brain drain resulting from retirements in key business functions can be devastating. Organizations that ignore the looming crisis will suffer the consequences later. The good news is that many senior leaders want to give back and create a legacy in their organization. You can seize the opportunity and engage your most senior leaders before they retire and harvest their collective experience to shape the next generation of leaders in your organization. If you want to take action, here are five steps to avoid the brain drain and turn your baby boomers into a brain trust.
39
40
www.uncexec.com
PA S S I N G T H E T O R C H : B R A I N D R A I N T O B R A I N T R U S T
41
The line manager survey asks three questions: 1. What knowledge will be lost when an employee retires? 2. What are the consequences of losing this knowledge? 3. How can the organization retain this knowledge? These surveys help the TVAs HR staff identify those employees who, according to their supervisors, hold critical knowledge and skills. HR staff members then interview both the supervisor and the employee to learn about the employees specific knowledge and skills. Jerry Landon, senior consultant for assessment and evaluations at TVA University, realized early on that these conversations are not as difficult as you may think. This interview process is very important, because we foundthat retiring workers really care about TVA and their jobs, reports Landon. They have devoted a good part of their lives to this organization, and many are very concerned that their knowledge of what makes this utility run will be lost or, even worse, just ignored when they retire. (Leonard, 2003). After the interview, HR assesses each employees skills and knowledge on a five point scale, with a five meaning that transferring and retaining the employees skills and knowledge should be a top priority. Those with high scores receive special attention and are asked to take on some new roles as consultants, instructors and mentors. In some cases, capturing knowledge is simply a matter of writing down procedures or processes. In other cases, reports Langdon, the interviews shed light on where processes could actually be improved, saving TVA money. For example, there might be one worker who has a very specialized skill in how to operate or repair an ancient type of electrical switch at a power station, Landon says. Well, the answer here may not be to keep doing this the same old way. The answer might be, lets upgrade the switch. In the long run, were going to save the organization a lot of money by finding solutions like this. (Leonard, 2003). TVAs knowledge retention initiative has also had some unexpected benefits. TVA senior leaders say the process has improved team building and made employees more cohesive, enhanced employees selfesteem as they realize that what they do counts, and lowered stress levels among supervisors who were concerned about losing valuable knowledge with employee retirements (Leonard, 2003).
42
www.uncexec.com
PA S S I N G T H E T O R C H : B R A I N D R A I N T O B R A I N T R U S T
43
44
www.uncexec.com
PA S S I N G T H E T O R C H : B R A I N D R A I N T O B R A I N T R U S T
Proven Methods Of Knowledge Transfer 1. Formal and Informal Mentoring and Coaching Programs
Coaching and mentoring programs provide an effective way to transfer knowledge and skills as well as the wisdom gained from years of experience. Coaches and mentors can share valuable information on a one-on-one basis, sharing personal insights and professional advice that lead to greater individual and organizational success. Your senior leaders are stewards of your organizations history, culture and values. The stories they pass on to the next generation of leaders can be more meaningful and powerful than any corporate mission statement.
The YMCA of Greater Rochester, New York, a non-profit organization with more than 2,700 employees, has been recognized by AARP for five consecutive years as an outstanding place to work for older workers. For the past several years, the YMCAs HR team has made a concentrated effort to recruit and retain older workers. A full-time staff member serves as a liaison with a group of 40 retirees in its workforce, managing employee support and relation activities. In addition, the organization keeps a roster of outside retirees who are interested and available for work and calls on them for temporary jobs, consulting projects and part-time work. The YMCA also offers phased retirement and works with recruiters from outside agencies to identify qualified older job seekers (SHRM, 2010). As part of its professional development programming, the YMCA gives employees the opportunity to participate in their Mentoring Across Generations program (also known as Generation YMCA), in which baby boomer employees are paired with Gen X and Gen Y employees to exchange information and skills (AARP, 2009).
45
Coaching Characteristics
1. Managers coach their staff as a required part of the job. 2. C oaching takes place within the confines of a formal manager-employee relationship. 3. The focus is to develop individuals within their current job. 4. The interest of the relationship is functional, arising out of the need for individuals to perform the tasks required to the best of their ability. 5. Managers tend to initiate and drive the relationship. 6. The relationship is finite, ending when an individual has learned what the coach is teaching.
Mentoring Characteristics
1. Mentoring occurs outside of a line manager-employee relationship, at the mutual consent of a mentor and employee. 2. Mentoring is career focused or focused on professional development that may be outside the employees area of work. 3. Relationships are personala mentor provides professional and personal support. 4. Relationships may be initiated by mentors or created through matches initiated by the organization. 5. Relationships cross job boundaries. 6. Relationships last for a specific period of time (nine months to a year) in a formal program, at which point the pair may continue in an informal mentoring relationship.
46
www.uncexec.com
PA S S I N G T H E T O R C H : B R A I N D R A I N T O B R A I N T R U S T
47
Conclusion
You can turn the impending baby boomer brain drain into a brain trust by developing programs that will transfer critical knowledge and skills to the next generation of leaders. In doing so, you can ensure your organizations future success and prevent the loss of valuable knowledge and experience. Follow the five steps outlined in this paper and proactively approach baby boomer retirement: 1. Conduct a strategic workforce analysis 2. Refine your retention strategy 3. Identify, prioritize and engage potential retirees 4. Prepare senior and emerging leaders 5. Create knowledge transfer opportunities
As the global economy recovers from the deepest recession in 70 years, organizations need every competitive advantage they can find to survive and thrive. Employers that explore and develop ways to leverage the knowledge and experience of employees approaching retirement age will discover that these workers offer a lasting legacy of outstanding corporate performance.
Anonymous (undated). Chevron Bridges Contract Positions. Chevron Alumni Community. Retrieved December 2010 from http://alumni.chevron.com/index.aphp. Barnhart, M. (2009). Keeping Top Talent: The Value of Employee Retention. Katz, Sapper & Miller. Retrieved on December 2010 from http://www.touchpointrecruiting.com/ doc/KSMTPRAdvisor2009.pdf. Cauchon, D. (2010, December 14). American Workforce Growing Grayer. USA Today. Retrieved December 2010 from http://www. usatoday.com/money/workplace/2010-12-14older-workers-employment_N.htm. CEO Consultant (2010, August 12). Aging Workforce10 Key Points on Training. CEOConsultant.com. Retrieved December 17, 2010 from http://www.ceoconsultant. com/business/aging-workforce-10-key-pointstraining/. Davis, D. (2008, September 24). Strategies to Employ and Retain Older Workers. Forum on North Carolinas Aging Workforce. Raleigh, NC: National Council on Aging. Delong, D. & Mann, T. (2003). Stemming the Brain Drain. Accenture. Retrieved January 2011 from http://www.accenture.com/Global/ Research_and_Insights/Outlook/By_Alphabet/ StemmingTheBrainDrain.htm.
Evans, P. (2010, December 15). Baby Boomer Retirement: Is Your Data Center Ready? CIO Network. Retrieved January 2011 from http://blogs.forbes.com/ciocentral/2010/12/15/ baby-boomer-retirement-is-your-data-centerready/.
James, B. (2008, April 8). Capitalizing on the Baby Boom Brain Drain. The HR Edge. Retrieved December 2010 from http:// thehredge.wordpress.com/2008/04/08/ capitalizing-on-the-baby-boomer-brain-drain/. Johnson, R. (2010). Phased Retirement
Moore, J. (2009, April 17). Knowledge Retention Helps Agencies Retain Employee Expertise. Federal Computer Week. Retrieved January 2011 from http://fcw. com/articles/2009/04/20/tips-for-knowledgeretention.aspx.
Gallagher, J. (2010, September 14). Older Workers Can ShineBut Will They Get a Chance? Michigan Business. Retrieved December 2010 from http://www.freep.com/. Gurchiek, K. (2011, January). Older Workers Need More Flexible Policies. HR Magazine. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resource Management. Hastings, R. (2008, October 2). Global Employers Lauded for Support of Workers Over 50. SHRM Online. Retrieved December 2010 from http://www.shrm.org/hrdisciplines/ diversity/articles/pages/globalemployerslauded. aspx. Hewlett, S. (2009, September 4). Reward Older Workers with What They Really Want. Bloomberg. Retrieved on December 2010 from http://www.bloomber.com/news/200909-04/reward-older-workers-with-what-theyreally-want.html. Jackson, H. & Rand, A. (2010, October). HR and the Aging Workforce: Two CEO Points of View. HR Magazine. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resource Management.
and Workplace Flexibility for Older Adults: Opportunities and Challenges. Focus on Workplace Flexibility. Retrieved December 2010 from http://workplaceflexibility.org/ images/uploads/program_papers/johnson_-_ phased_retirement_and_workplace_flexibility. pdf. Leonard, B. (2003, July). More than 2,500 Employees Riding the Age Wave. HR Magazine. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resource Management. Leonard, B. (2010, January 10). Economic Uncertainty Shaping Employee Relations Trends for 2011. SHRM Online. Retrieved January 2011 from www.shrm.org. McGregor, J. (2009, November 13). How Older Workers Can Lighten the Load. Bloomberg Businessweek. Retrieved December 2010 from http://www.businessweek.com/managing/ content/nov2009/ca20091111_435788.htm. Management Mentors (undated). Corporate Mentoring vs. Corporate Coaching. Management Mentors. Retrieved January 2011 from http://www.management-mentors. com/resources/coaching-and-mentoring/.
Nichols, M. (2008, October 22). Americas Aging Workforce: Its Time for Employers to Accept Reality. Citizen Economists. Retrieved December 2010 from http://www. citizeneconomics.com/blogs/2008/10/22/ americas-aging-workforce-its-time-foremployers-to-accept-reality/. Pitt-Catsouphes, M. (2009, October). Talent Management Study: The Pressures of Talent Management. Boston, MA: The Sloan Center on Aging and Work at Boston College. Roth, R. (2010, September 5). How BMW Deals with an Aging Workforce. CBS News. Retrieved December 2010 from http://www. cbsnews.com/stories/2010/09/05/sunday/ main6837469.shtml. SHRM (2009, November 17). SHRM-AARP Poll Shows Concern About Aging Workforce. SHRM Online. Retrieved December 2010 from http://www.shrm.org. Smith, D. (2010, Dec. 22). Leading Edge of U.S. Baby Boomers Content Survey. Washington, DC: Reuters. Tennessee Valley Authority (undated). Knowledge Retention. TVA. Retrieved January 2011 from http://www.tva.gov/ knowledgeretention/.
48
www.uncexec.com
Helping you
Our executive development open enrollment offerings combine powerful continuing business education content with real-world work experience. Through action learning and business simulation activities, we challenge participants to think, reflect, and grow as leaders.
GENERAL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
Executive Development Institute Negotiation Skills for Effective Managers Change Management Sales Management Strategic Planning and Business Decision Making
LEADERSHIP AND EFFECTIVENESS
Business and Human Resources: Leading HR and Your Organization into the Future
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Leadership Effectiveness Workshop Project Leadership: Build a Best-in-Class Project Team Women in Business: Transitioning to Leadership
Becoming Green: Effective Sustainability Strategies for You and Your Organization
UNC EXECUTIVE DEVELOPMENT
49
Promise
Employees and employers face the same dilemma these days when it comes to keeping skills sharp; neither have the time nor the money to spend on long-term learning and development opportunities. Most training and human resource professionals know, however, that there is a direct, positive link between providing meaningful learning and development opportunities to employees and job satisfaction--when you train employees, job satisfaction increases, as does employee retention.
Introduction
One solution to the dilemma of providing quality training opportunities as corporate resources continue to dwindle is on-demand, online learning programs. Many training and development professionals shelved earlier E-learning prototypes because they lacked key components to the transfer of learningthe ability to interact and collaborate with instructors and fellow students. Over the years, E-learning programs have matured into interactive experiences that engage all types of learners. Todays E-learning takes what worked from earlier versions of distance learning (such as video conferencing) and combines it with new Web technologies, to provide richer, more dynamic learning experiences than ever before. This white paper will discuss the evolution of online, on-demand learning and what to look for when designing or purchasing E-learning programs for your organization. Through case examples, it will also provide training and development professionals with ideas about how to apply on-demand learning in their workplaces to meet strategic objectives and succeed in todays fast-paced global marketplace.
E-learning Benefits
Reduces costs Saves time Offers flexibility Allows social interaction with other participants and instructors Engages all types of learning styles
50
www.uncexec.com
51
{ e- lrn-ing }
Negotiating E-learning Jargon
E-learning is the general term used for all varieties of electronic teaching and learning.
Varieties of E-learning include Web-based learning, computer-based learning and virtual classrooms. Content can be delivered through the Internet, intranet or extranet, audio or videotape, satellite TV or CD-ROM. It can be self-paced or instructor-led and includes media in the form of text, image, animation, streaming video and audio.
E-learning 2.0 emerged with the launch of Web 2.0 technologies, which emphasized
information sharing and collaboration. E-learning 2.0 technologies supplement E-learning by adding social learning components such as discussion boards, wikis, blogs, podcasts and virtual worlds.
52
www.uncexec.com
53
For training and development professionals considering incorporating E-learning into their training offerings, seeing a demo of the product is an absolute must. Develop a checklist listing the benchmark features you are looking for in an E-learning environment. Items on the checklist may include: I f the training is to be asynchronous, does it allow participants easy entry and exit points? How easy is it for participants to stop and pick up later where they left off? D oes it offer learning checkpoints along the way to assess learning? These checkpoints can include quizzes but may also involve video conferences or collaborative bulletin board postings where students work on a project together or discuss a particular subject. W hat other interactive features are included to help students learn? Is there tutor or instructor support available? W hat reports are made available to the employer to ensure employee participation and completion? Is the technology easily accessible by all participants? F or the less technically adept, are there clear, simple directions and tutorials for use? A re there case studies included to help bring the learning into the workplace and real-life situation? If possible, consider piloting the E-learning program with a smaller group of employees and ask for their feedback at the end of the training. These employees can provide excellent testimonials and help support a wider launch of the E-learning activity.
I was impressed with the comprehensiveness of the UNC Business Essentials program. The coursework provided a well-rounded set of tools that I can use for thinking and acting in business situations. The level of personal attention by the tutors challenged me to approach discussion questions with depth and clarity. The material was practical and urged me to connect my working experience with the themes presented in the lectures. Lastly, the delivery format is very accommodating to students schedules and timely in the light of emerging work practices. I began the coursework in Chapel Hill and finished in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Andrew Cary Co-founder of Infused Industries, Inc. Raleigh, N.C. Recent UNC Business Essentials graduate
54
www.uncexec.com
55
A key element to ADPs success has been the companys commitment to continuous learning for sales associatesa process that starts from the day they are hired. Until 2004, new sales associates were given two weeks of face-to-face training at ADPs Atlanta training center, followed by two weeks off and then another two-week training period, also in the Atlanta training center. According to Tim Dewey, ADP employer services sales distance learning manager, the process was effective but, with 7,500 sales associates nationwide, extremely costly. ADP decided to rein in costs by piloting an online training program. The results were so positive that ADP quickly adopted it for all new sales associates.
56
www.uncexec.com
The online training program has reduced the time spent in Atlanta from four weeks to one, a benefit to not only ADP but to employees as well. The companys new sales associates enjoy the process more because it is less intrusive in their family lives and they are more productive right off the bat, reports Dewey. The online training program has increased comprehension, retention and even final grades. The program was initially designed for new hires, but has been expanded to include every aspect of training for the sales organization. n addition to a better-prepared sales force, ADP saw I substantial cost savings. The organization saved $1.2 million in travel and accommodation expenses the first year alone. Additional benefits have included more than $1.5 million in annual savings, a 12 percent increase in first-year annual sales per sales associate, and a 10 times faster time-to- deployment of new content.
Allen, I.E. & Seaman, J. (2010). Learning on Demand. Online Education in the United States, 2009. Babson Park, MA: Babson Research Group. Bersin & Associates. (2006). Blended Learning in Leadership Programs. Retrieved October 2010 from www.bersin.com.
Bersin & Associates. (2003, May). Blended Learning: What Works? Retrieved October 2010 from www.e-learningguru.com/wpapers/ blended_bersin.doc.
Howard, C. (2008, March 21). Learning OnDemand: A New Role for Enterprise Learning. Oakland, CA: Bersin & Associates. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M.,
Rossett, A. & Marshall, J. (January 2010). E-learning: Whats Old Is New Again. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development. Retrieved November 2010 from http://www.astd.org/TD/Archives/2010/ Jan/Free/1001_eLearning_Whats_Old.htm.
Blackboard. Corporate Case Studies. Retrieved November 2010 from http://www.blackboard. com/Solutions-by-Market/Corporate/CaseStudies.aspx.
Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of Evidence- Based Practices in Online Learning. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
57
U N C
B U S I N E S S
E S S E N T I A L S
Companies need employees to do more within the organization, and employees need a strong foundation in business to be more effective. The UNC Business Essentials program is designed to help employees gain this essential business knowledge in a flexible e-learning environment that limits associated costs and time away from work. Taken on an individual basis or customized to meet an organizations specific needs, UNC Business Essentials provides the best in business basic training. To learn more, visit www.uncbusinessessentials.com.
UNC EXECUTIVE DEVELOPMENT
58
PAID
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Kenan-Flagler Business School Executive Development Campus Box 3445 Rizzo Conference Center Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3445 Permit Number 177 Chapel Hill, NC
In this issue:
Making the Business Case for Learning and Development: 5 Steps for Success Ready, Aim, Coach: How HR Can (and Should) Coach Managers on Problem Employee Behaviors Putting Success Back in Succession Planning: The Role of Learning and Development Passing the Torch: 5 Steps for Turning the Baby Boomer Brain Drain into a Brain Trust Unlocking the Potential of On-Demand Learning in the Workplace