Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
available at www.sciencedirect.com
abstract
Keywords: Betula Biolm Consortium Insect vectors Mycocins Sap-ow Trichosporon pullulans Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous Yeasts Spring sap-ow, i.e. xylem sap exuding through wounds of deciduous trees in spring, quickly becomes colonised by yeasts and lamentous fungi, of which several species occur regularly in consortia from different trees or regions. This article considers the survival, spread and population dynamics of these fungi, with particular emphasis on the substantial research by Wladyslav I. Golubev on birch sap-ows in Russia. Most fungi survive in the soil or epiphytically on tree trunks, and dispersal between trees is probably mediated by insects. Competition within and between sap-ow yeast species may be due to nutritional effects or the action of killer toxins (mycocins). 2006 The British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1.
Introduction
In the May issue of this years Mycologist I co-authored a short article describing a colourful consortium of lamentous fungi and yeasts colonising freshly cut birch stumps in Germany (Weber et al. 2006). Despite substantial literature searches on this topic, I remained unaware of a series of three seminal and highly relevant papers published by Wladyslav I. Golubev in the former Soviet Union (Golubev et al. 1977a,b, Shkidchenko & Golubev 1980). Although these articles are available in English translations, they have been cited only rarely by non-Russian scientists. It is therefore appropriate to discuss Golubevs work here, not least because it provides an interesting background and contrast to our results on red yeast consortia discovered in Germany (Weber et al. 2006) and subsequently in Italy (Weber & Davoli 2005).
2.
Tree exudates may be of two kinds, viz. slow but long-lasting (chronic slime-uxes) or vigorous but short-lived (spring sap-ows). Chronic exudates are caused by various factors,
such as mechanical injury or activity of invertebrate and microbial (especially bacterial) tree pathogens. Lasting for several months or even years, they harbour their own well-characterised microbial comunities. Many yeast species have been isolated and described from invertebrates associated with slime-uxes, such as wood-boring insects (see Phaff & Starmer 1987), ies (Phaff & Knapp 1956) and nematodes (e.g. Kerrigan et al. 2004). There is a high degree of host tree specicity which may be enforced by selection due to the nutrient composition of the sap or the presence of host defence compounds. Further, dispersal may be inuenced by the feeding preferences of insects which are the most important vectors for microbial consortium members (Phaff & Starmer 1987; Phaff 1990). In fact, yeasts play an important role in insect nutrition, and the insect gut harbours an immense diversity of yeasts, many of them belonging to as yet undescribed species (Suh et al. 2005). These yeasts may be spread by defaecation, as is well-known for Pichia spp. (Kurtzman 1998). In contrast to chronic slime-uxes, spring sap-ows are conned to the period of bud break when the high root pressure of many broad-leaved trees causes sap to rise. If the bark of trunks or branches is injured, massive bleeding
E-mail address: rwsweber@rhrk.uni-kl.de 0269-915X/$ see front matter 2006 The British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.mycol.2006.09.015
141
(sap-ow) may result. The xylem sap contains its highest concentrations of sugars and other nutrients in spring because these underground storage compounds are mobilised towards the expanding buds (Kallio & Ahtonen 1987; Ahtonen & Kallio 1989). Not surprisingly, therefore, the microbial composition of spring sap-ows differs from that found in chronic slime-uxes. Birch trees (Betula spp.) are particularly prolic producers of spring sap-ow, and their sap, being rich in monosaccharides (up to 1 % w/v), is collected commercially in Finland and North America for use as a health-promoting beverage or in the production of birch syrup as an alternative to maple syrup.
(Italy), and on Carpinus betulus in the Upper Appennines (Italy). The most obvious overlaps with the Russian suspension consortia described by Golubev et al. (1977a,b) were the late-stage colonisers X. dendrorhous and T. pullulans at the species level, and Cryptococcus at the generic level (Fig. 1); another overlap was the red yeast Cystolobasidium capitatum (W.I. Golubev, personal communication). Nonetheless, the German and Italian biolms differed from the Russian suspensions in several important aspects, e.g. the prominence of the ascomycete yeast Hanseniaspora uvarum and the red basidiomycete yeast Cystolobasidium inrmominiatum, and the presence of mycelial fungi, notably Mucor hiemalis. These are fungi associated with plant remains and the soil, but repeated records of their presence in sap-ow biolms argue against chance contaminations.
5.
4.
Fungi have been reported in the past as growing in biolms in spring sap-ows, but most of these older investigations are decient in details of species identication and/or give no indication of species composition of individual consortia (see Kobayashi 1953). For this reason, Weber and Davoli (2005) and Weber et al. (2006) examined spring sap-ow consortia on Betula pendula in Kaiserslautern (Germany) and Modena
By means of carefully executed single- and dual-culture laboratory experiments, Shkidchenko and Golubev (1980) found that T. pullulans and X. dendrorhous have faster growth rates than their main competitors, concluding that substrate competition, in addition to low freeze-thawing tolerance, is a likely explanation for the dominance of these two species in the nal phase of birch sap colonisation. Nutritional interactions have also been described. Thus, X. dendrorhous appears capable of utilising organic acids released by C. skinneri, resulting in the coexistence and enhanced growth of these two species in dual-culture in the absence of other competitors (Shkidchenko & Golubev 1980). A more intriguing case is that of infraspecic (i.e. strainspecic) competition in T. pullulans. Golubev et al. (2002) found that certain strains of T. pullulans produce a proteinaceous toxin capable of killing non-toxigenic strains of the same species from sap-ows but ineffective against other yeast species and even against T. pullulans strains from other habitats. Such killer toxins, called mycocins, are encoded by virus-like agents which bestow resistance upon the yeast cell containing them. Mycocins with an infraspecic action spectrum are common among ascomycete and basidiomycete yeasts (e.g. Saccharomyces; Magliani et al. 1997), whilst broader action spectra have been reported less frequently (Golubev 2006). In nature, killer strains are generally more abundant in nutrient-rich than nutrient-decient habitats (Starmer et al. 1987). Assuming that mycocin production poses an signicant metabolic burden with a retarding effect on growth rate, mathematical models can be developed to simulate the co-existence of killer and non-killer strains in transient and discrete habitats such ra n & Hoekstra 2003). In T. pullulans, the proas sap-ows (Cza portion of mycocin-producing cells among the total population in birch sap-ows rises steeply as the cell density of T. pullulans increases during spring, and mycocin production is lost again before the onset of the next growing season (Golubev et al. 2002). Other yeasts found in sap-ow consortia may also produce mycocins, e.g. C. inrmominiatum (Golubev et al. 2003) and H. uvarum (Schmitt et al. 1997), although their production in this habitat does not seem to have been examined as yet.
142
R. W. S. Weber
Fig. 1 Summary of the presence of fungi in suspension (planktonic phase; Golubev et al. 1977a,b) and in biolms (Weber & Davoli 2005; Weber et al. 2006) of spring sap-ow consortia. Dominant species present in 50 % of subsamples are indicated in bold.
hiemalis, Fusarium spp.) and the yeasts Galactomyces geotrichum and Cryptococcus spp. Hanseniaspora uvarum (anamorph Kloeckera apiculata) is common on the surfaces of ripe and rotting fruits and has also been detected in the soil of fruit orchards (Phaff & Starmer 1987). Therefore, cells or spores of yeasts already present on the bark most probably represent the initial inoculum in early spring. Consortium members surviving in the soil may be disseminated by rainsplash, wind movements or insects. Further, if a sap-ow reaches the soil in early spring, it may provide a track for upwardly mobile lamentous fungi such as the fast-growing and sporulating Mucor and Fusarium spp. Insects are probably crucial as vectors for inoculum between different trees showing sap-ows. Fruit-ies and bees have been reported as carriers of several of the yeasts found in sap-ow consortia, an example being H. uvarum which is ingested by ies feeding on rotting fruits (Batra et al. 1973; Vacek et al. 1979; Phaff & Starmer 1987). Flies alight at sap-ows for feeding, and we have also noticed dung beetles (Geotrupes stercorarius) aggregating in high numbers at such
143
sites. Efcient and rapid dispersal by insects may account for the spectacular phenomenon of every available stump in clear-felled plots being colonised by colouful biolms, as already noted by the earliest workers (Ludwig 1891).
Acknowledgement
I am grateful to Prof. W.I. Golubev and S. Herz for their constructive comments on early versions of this manuscript.
references
Ahtonen S, Kallio H, 1989. Identication and seasonal variations of amino acids in birch sap used for syrup production. Food Chemistry 33: 125132. Barnett JA, Payne RW, Yarrow D, 2000. Yeasts: Characteristics and Identication, third ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Batra LR, Batra SWT, Bohart GE, 1973. The mycoora of domesticated and wild bees (Apoidea). Mycopathologia et Mycologia Applicata 49: 1344. ra n TL, Hoekstra RF, 2003. Killer-sensitive coexistence in Cza metapopulations of micro-organisms. Proceedings of the Royal Society (London) B 270: 13731378. Golubev WI, 1995. Perfect state of Rhodomyces dendrorhous (Phafa rhodozyma). Yeast 11: 101110. Golubev WI, 2006. Antagonistic interactions among yeasts. In: ter G (eds), Biodiversity and Ecophysiology of Yeasts. Rosa CA, Pe Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 197219. Golubev VI, Babeva IP, Blagodatskaya VM, Reshetova IS, 1977a. Taxonomic study of yeasts isolated from spring sap ows. Microbiology 46: 461466. Golubev VI, Babeva IP, Novik SN, 1977b. Yeast succession in birch sap ows. Soviet Journal of Ecology 8: 399403. Golubev WI, Pfeiffer I, Golubeva E, 2002. Mycocin production in Trichosporon pullulans populations colonizing tree exudates in the spring. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 40: 151157. Golubev WI, Pfeiffer I, Churkina LG, Golubeva EW, 2003. Doublestranded RNA viruses in a mycocinogenic strain of Cystolobasidium inrmominiatum. FEMS Yeast Research 3: 6368. Kallio H, Ahtonen S, 1987. Seasonal variations of the sugars in birch sap. Food Chemistry 25: 293304. Kerrigan J, Smith MT, Rogers JD, Poot GA, 2004. Botryozyma mucatilis sp. nov., an anamorphic ascomycetous yeast associated
with nematodes in poplar slime ux. FEMS Yeast Research 4: 849856. Kobayashi Y, 1953. Yeasts and moulds in the trunk-exudations. Bulletin of the National Science Museum (Tokyo) 33: 3146. Kurtzman CP, 1998. Pichia E.C. Hansen emend. Kurtzman. In: Kurtzman CP, Fell JW (eds), The Yeasts: A Taxonomic Study, fourth ed. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 273352. Ludwig F, 1891. Der Milch- und Rothuss der Ba ume und ihre Urheber. Centralblatt fu r Bakteriologie und Parasitenkunde 10: 1013. Magliani W, Conti S, Gerloni M, Bertolotti D, Polonelli L, 1997. Yeast killer systems. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 10: 369400. Phaff HJ, 1990. Isolation of yeasts from natural sources. In: Labeda DP (ed), Isolation of Biotechnological Organisms from Nature. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 5379. Phaff HJ, Knapp EP, 1956. The taxonomy of yeasts found in exudates of certain trees and other natural breeding sites of some species of Drosophila. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 22: 117130. Phaff HJ, Starmer WT, 1987. Yeasts associated with plants, insects and soil. In: Rose AH, Harrison JS (eds), The Yeasts Vol. 1: Biology of Yeasts, second ed. Academic Press, London, pp. 123180. Schmitt MJ, Poravou O, Trenz K, Rehfeldt K, 1997. Unique double-stranded RNAs responsible for the anti-Candida activity of the yeast Hanseniaspora uvarum. Journal of Virology 71: 88528855. Shkidchenko AN, Golubev VI, 1980. Continuous culture of yeasts from birch sap ows, in pure and mixed culture. Microbiology 49: 3438. Starmer WT, Ganter PF, Aberdeen V, Lachance M-A, Phaff HJ, 1987. The ecological role of killer yeasts in natural communities of yeasts. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 33: 783796. Suh S-O, McHugh JV, Pollock DD, Blackwell M, 2005. The beetle gut: a hyperdiverse source of novel yeasts. Mycological Research 109: 261265. Vacek DC, Starmer WT, Heed WB, 1979. Relevance of the ecology of Citrus yeasts to the diet of Drosophila. Microbial Ecology 5: 4349. Weber RWS, Davoli P, 2005. Xanthophyllomyces and other red yeasts in microbial consortia on spring sap-ow in the Mod` dei Naturalisti e ena province (Northern Italy). Atti della Societa Matematici di Modena 136: 127135. Weber RWS, Davoli P, Anke H, 2006. A microbial consortium involving the astaxanthin producer Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous on freshly cut birch stumps in Germany. Mycologist 20: 5761.