GENESIS OF THE TRKIC RUNIC ALPHABET Posted: 13-Oct-2009 at 09:22 Source : http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?

TID=27831

Introduction The origin of the Trkic runic alphabet, despite the efforts of several generations of Trkologists, still remains problematic. Guesses about the origin of the Yenisei script suggested before their decoding were only based on visual, external resemblances of the Trkic runes with the Gothic runes (O.G.Tichzen, G.Rommel, N.Popov) or with Greek, Etruscan and Anatolian (G.Spassky, J.Klaprot, O.Donner) letters1. When N.M.Yadrintsev discovered the Orkhon runic inscriptions, he also saw in them "an Indo-European alphabet, reminding for a long time the Phoenician, Gothic, Greek, etc. letters " 2. However in the 19th century science had not yet accumulated significant proofs for the problem. Therefore, W.Thomsen had a reason to state the following: "It should be firmly remembered that all likewise resemblances, thus, are like an optical illusion. Only when other means allow to determine the meaning of the letters, such comparisons to other alphabets would be of value for the origin of this script" 3. And the suggestion by A.Shifner4 about independent origin of the enigmatic Yenisei script from the tamgas was, in essence, an equation with two unknowns. The decipherer of the Trkic runic alphabet W.Thomsen5 tentatively linked the Orkhon alphabet to the Aramaic, or more precisely to its version, Pehlevi (Perso-Aramaic) alphabet. The hypothesis of W.Thomsen about Aramaic (Aramaic-Pehlevi and Aramaic-Sogdian) as a basis for the Trkic runic alphabet was construed on a rather remote analogies of some (about half) letters of the Orkhon alphabet. We should note that Trkic runes have much more likeness with the ancient Phoenician-Aramaic letters, instead of the Pehlevi and Sogdian. Unfortunately, an uncritical attitude toward the W.Thomsen's hypothesis is observed until now. As an example can serve a not yet confirmed by any facts suggestion by S.G.Klyashtorny6 that Trkic runic script was adopted in the 5th century from the Sogdians of the Gansu and Gaochan. After the W.Thomsen decoding, O.Donner7 fairly considered the distinctions between Yenisei and Orkhon characters as a sign of a long development period of the Trkic runic alphabet, but at the same time he asserted without substantiation that the Orkhon-Yenisean script has arisen, at Uigurs, Trks and Kyrgyzes in the 4th century on the basis of the Indo-Bactrian (also called IndoScythian, Aryan, Bactrian) "Karoshti" letters, then known from the inscriptions on the rocks and coins (3 century BC - 2 century AD). After investigation it becomes obvious that between Trkic runes and "Karoshti" signs no close resemblance exist8.

289

At last, the F.Altheim's9 guess that the Ancient Trkic (and "proto-Bulgarian") runes descend from the Armazian Aramaic script that the Trkic-speaking Huns ostensibly adopted in the Caucasus at the turn of the 3 - 4 centuries is also not supported by any concrete facts10 and observable match of written signs. In a opposition with the hypothesis of W.Thomsen, a Russian orientalist N.A.Aristov " has anew substantiated the hypothesis of A.Shifner about a local tamga-derived source of the Trkic runes. N.A.Aristov found outward similarity with the Trkic tamgas in 29 out of 38 signs of the Orkhon alphabet. Later this hypothesis found support by N.Mallitsky12 and A.Sokolov13. To the opinion of the origin of the Orkhon-Yenisean script from the "local tamgas and others ideograms" in our time was leaning I.A.Batmanov14. As a rule, every clan and tribal tamga between the Trkic-speaking peoples had a name corresponding to the graphic form of a sign (frequently connected with specific objects). For example, tamga of the Kazakh clan Baltal or is called balta "axe",

tamga of a clan Baganaly tamga of the tribe Kongrat

or

is called bashan "rod with split end",

is called bosaga "threshold",

tamga of the tribe Kangly is called kseu "fire iron", etc. If it would be possible to establish sometime the initial names, verbal epithets of the ancient tamga signs (graphic logograms), the hypothesis of A.Shifner - N.A.Aristov can receive a better plausibility. The random outward comparisons of Trkic runes with the tamgas and other ancient signs are insufficiently convincing. W.Thomsen15 and E.D.Polivanov16 suggested a possibility of ideographic origin of some of the Trkic runic characters which are not deduced from the Aramaic alphabet. Suggesting Trkic etymologies for runic characters value of "y" in "york"),
o

j, aj (aj "moon, crescent") (here author's "j" has a phonetic b, b (eb "dwelling, yurt"), W.Thomsen 1, 1 (el "palm of a hand"),

q, uq (oq "arrow") and

simultaneously doubted similar etymologies for the runic characters r, r (er "man, husband"),

n, n (en -"descend, go down", compare en "bottom, descent"),

, ( "trap, snare, fishing tackle"),

t, at (at "horse") and

, a (eik "door"). So far it is difficult to tell to what degree the Trkic runes in their origin are due to ideograms (or better, to graphic logograms), because their paleography is still investigated insufficiently. Nevertheless, exist sufficient reasons to suggest that some specific runic characters nt directly go back to a pre-alphabetic script.
290

lt,

rt and

Trkish scientist A.J, Emre17 embarked to study Trkic runic alphabet as a development of ideographic writing, related to the Sumerian linear writing: oq, oq "arrow" - Sumer. k, kz "eye" - Sumer. d, adaq "leg" - Sumer. j, ja(j) "bow" - Sumer. ARROW, EYE, LEG, BOW, CORRAL,

, eik "door" (Turk. eik "threshold") - Sumer. lt ~ ld, alt "bottom"-Sumer.

LOWER PART of the BODY (man), etc.

The outward similarity of some signs belonging to different ideographic (logographic) scripts is usually explained by a similarity of the respective objects, therefore such comparisons are deemed to be insufficiently convincing. According to a hypothesis of an English researcher J. Closon18, the Trkic runic alphabet was ostensibly invented in the third

quarter of the 6th century under an order of Istemi-Kagan, and was composed as a some kind of secret code from arbitrarily changed Aramaic (Pehlevi, Sogdian) and Greek (Byzantian, Ephtalite) letters. A citation of a fictitious "inventor" testifies to a non-serious attitude of J. Closon to the unresolved problem. In effect, it is an attempt to avoid studying the historical development and natural genetic links of the Trkic runic alphabet, which itself is non-uniform in its local versions. The genetic links of the Trkic runes still have not received a scientific illumination. W.Thomsen has given precisely a decoding, not an interpretation of the Trkic runic (Orkhon-Yenisean) alphabet, the true origin of which remained unknown. The science has not yet established neither the real age of the Trkic runic script, nor its direct source. The hypotheses about the origin of the Orkhon-Yenisean script were not supported with really close correspondences of the compared written signs19. It only transpired that exist supporters of exogenic origin of the Trkic runic alphabet (W.Thomsen, O.Donner, F.Altheim, J. Closon) and the supporters of endogenic origin of this script (N.A.Aristov, A.J. Emre).
291

As an interpreter of the W.Thomsen hypothesis recently rose a known Iranist V.A.Livshits20, in whose opinion the main source ("raw material for working pra-forms") for the Orkhon alphabet was a relatively late version of the Sogdian cursive writing, corresponding to the ancient Uigur alphabet. V.A.Livshits dedices the Trkic (Orkhon) runes from the letters of new Sogdian letters by means of "reconstruction of graphical prototypes in the process of creation of the runic alphabet" 21. So, a Sogdian letters (, , L) by means of three "transformations"

turns into Trkic runic letters d, l, l'. Arming with this method would make it difficult to avoid subjectivity in resolving the question. Anyway, a version about Sogdian base of the Trkic runic characters requires weightier proofs.

A deeper study of the epigraphic finds in the territory of Kazakhstan allows to uncover most ancient monuments of written culture belonging to the remote ancestors of the Trkic-speaking peoples. The existence of alphabetic writing in the culture of early nomadic tribes in the Southern Siberia and Kazakhstan is evidenced, at least, by two runic or rune-like inscriptions from the burials of the 5th - 4th centuries BC22. They are: an inscription on a bone buckle from r. Irtysh valley, and an inscription on a silver cup from r. Ili valley. These inscriptions are apparently made in the Ancient Trkic language, and belong to a fairly early version of the Trkic runes, closely connected to the Mediterranean alphabetic writings of the middle of the 1st millennium BC.
Bone buckle inscription r. Irtysh valley kurgan, ca. 400-500 BC Silver cup inscription Issyk kurgan, 500 BC (C14 dating here)

In a valley of r. Ili were found two rock inscriptions in ancient Greek alphabet23. The language attribution of one of them is under doubt, and another is in Trkic. Both inscriptions have been made in the 1st millennium AD (judging by archaic letters, direction from right to left). There is analogy with the Trkic runic alphabet of Talas, Yenisei and Orkhon inscriptions. Paleographically these inscriptions can also be attributed to the middle of the 1st millennium BC, which points to a relative stability of the Trkic runic script. The fascinating historical fate of the ancient Greek alphabet in the Jeti-Su also indirectly testifies to the most ancient tradition of writing in the Trkic-speaking tribes.
Greek rock inscription "ISAG 1080" r. Ili valley ca. 770 AD Greek-Trkic rock inscription "AG BAPAM"-"MY NOBLE ANSESTOR" Almaty valley, 1st millennium AD

Based on systematic study of the graphics of the Ancient Trkic runic inscriptions, and new results of the Trkic epygraphical studies, now is appearing an opportunity to approach closely to the solution of the problem about the Trkic runes origin (genetic

links). From the correct resolution of this key problem in many respects depend the prospects for the development of Trkology24. The areas of distribution and chronological frameworks of the Trkic runes basically correspond with the Ancient Trkic statehood of the 6th - 10th centuries, though some inscriptions are occasionally found in the kurgans belonging to the epoch of early nomads (rivers Irtysh, Ili, Yaik). In the Central Asia by now were found about three hundred ancient Trkic runic inscriptions. The dynastic Orkhon epitaphs belong to the 8th century, and the Yenisei and Talas inscriptions, as a rule, have no reliable dating. By tradition it is thought that some Yenisei and Talas inscriptions are much older than the Orkhon inscriptions. S.E.Malov believed that Yenisei inscriptions belong to the 5th - 10th (11th) centuries, and Talas inscriptions belong to the 5th - 8th centuries.25 The Talas inscriptions - epitaphs on the boulders, as showed archeological al excavations, already appeared in the 5th century,26 and in any case, long before the10th century.27
292

The viewes of some researchers that the Trkic runic script in Yenisei and Talas appeared late, than in Orkhon, seem to be insufficiently justified28. For example, in the I.V.Kormushin's opinion, without exception all Yenisei monuments are written not earlier than the middle of the 10th - 11th centuries.29 But because the dating graphical features selected by I.V.Kormushin do not correspond to the evolution of the Trkic runic alphabet, and are very vulnerable from purely paleographic side (the monumental script is deduced from the cursive script, even though even in the manuscripts the Trkic runes did not change to the really cursive forms), he had to recognize that these "markers sometimes conflict with each other"30. Some of the Yenisei inscriptions epitaphs, like the expressions trk qan balbal "balbal of the Trkic khan" testify (E 3210), ben ltim trg el iint " I died in Trgesh state" (E 373), etc., are made not later then the middle of the 8th century, before the overthrow of the Trkic and Trgesh dynasties. Incidentally, in these monuments is repeatedly used the runic character t, which is I.V.Kormushin's main dating marker of the monuments not older than the middle of the 9th century.

The graphics of the Talas, Yenisei and Orkhon inscriptions testifies that the Trkic runic alphabet, non-uniform in its local versions, has a long history of development, and generally reflects the sound system of the ancient Trkic language31. *** Historical perspective The genesis question of the Trkic runic alphabet, its creation place and time, to be resolved objectively requires a complex analysis of the alphabet paleography, together with history of cultural contacts of the ancient world, together with history of formation of the Trkic ethnic type. S.E.Malov's noted the following: "In questions of chronology we in Trkology still have many established cliches, some of them quite fair for the known time and for the known geographical space. [...] In my classification of the Trkic languages I, as a result of the my studies, set back the emergence of the Trkic languages in the same form as we have them now, two thousand years deeper"32. In the beginning of the 1st millennium BC, according to archeology, pastoral-agricultural tribes of the Bronze Epoch of the Southern Siberia and Kazakhstan steppes (so-called "Andronov Culture tribes") passed to a more progressive, nomadic cattle tribal. In the 5th - 4th centuries BC the early Asian nomads almost completed a transition to the use of iron. These nomad tribes belonged to the so-called Andronov anthropological type33, that made a basis for the anthropological type of Kazakhs, Karakalpaks, Kirghizes, Altaians, partly Uzbeks, etc. The increase in economical connections and a need to protect their herds and pastures forced a unification of the nomad tribes in military-tribal unions, where developed a process of leveling the tribal distinctions and merging of tribal languages.
293

In the territory of Kazakhstan and Central Asia in the 7th - 4th centuries BC, as testify the ancient Greek historians (Herodotus and others) and Persian cuneiform inscriptions of Darius I, were associations of Scythian- Sakan tribes which had their specific names, territory, ways of life (nomadic, hunting and settled tribes), ethnicity and, probably, languages. "The ethnic problem of Scythians, - posited A.N.Bernshtam, - is not beyond the

hypotheses. The dispute about Trkism or Iranism of the Scythians is as old as the Orientalistics itself. The solution for these problems lies in the archeological al materials"34. The application of the term "Scythians" in relation to the autochthons of the Altai and Jeti-Su is in problematic itself (this is not a region of Herodotus "Scythia"), and does not serve at all as a proof of their Irano-linguality. Sometimes the Trkic ethnogenesis is directly linked with nomadic cattle breeding, the Mongolian ethnogenesis is directly linked with the hunting economy, the Iranian ethnogenesis is directly linked with agricultural economy35. Such a simplistic approach is poorly justified, "All eastern tribes, wrote K.Marx, - can be traced from the very beginning of history a general relationship between the settled part of population and continued nomadism of another part "36. The Chinese historical chronicles tell that in the 3rd - 1st centuries BC in the territories of the Saka's tribal federations formed nomadic tribal unions of Usuns, Kangys and Uechjis. In the Central Asia from the end of the 3rd century BC till the 1st century AD was an association of 24 nomadic tribes of Huns (Hunnu, Snnu). The Trkic-speaking Huns displaced the Uechji and Usun tribes from the east to the west. In the 1st century BC Usuns occupied Tian-Shan and Jeti-Su area. Uechjis, whom L.N.Gumilev37 identifies with the carriers Pazyryk Cultures in Altai, established in the 1st century AD along Cheyhun (Amu Darya) a Kushan (Ku-Sn - Trk. White Hun) state . Kangy tribes, according to the Chinese sources, in the 2nd century BC - 7th century AD lived in the valleys of the Middle and Lower Seyhun (Syr-Darya). The Trkic-linguality of the dynastic tribe of the Usun (As-Sn Trk. As' Hun) union was stated by F.Hirt38, K.Siratori39, N.A.Aristov40 and other researchers after analysis of the Chinese transcriptions of the Usun words (kn beg, ulu, tarqan, etc.). "The presence of Trkic words in the language of ancient Usuns in the 3rd - 1st cc. BC, - noted Yu.A.Zuev, - makes questionable the standard in the Soviet historical literature point of view about socalled "Trkifation" of the local population in Kazakhstan and Central Asia by the Huns (Chinese: Snnu), beguning in the 1st century BC"41 (Snnu is a Trkic dialectal name for Huns, used by Chinese in the 3rd c. BC).

archeological al research allowed to establish that between carriers of the local cultures of Southern Siberia and the Near East in 1st millennium BC existed diverse and deep cultural links42. Most evidently it is visible in the applied fine arts of Scythian or Saka tribes.
294

*** Paleographic analysis The paleographic analysis leads to a conclusion about very early date of appearance of the Trkic runic alphabet in Southern Siberia and Jeti-Su, not later then the middle of the 1st millennium BC. This alphabet display a close genetic proximity, firstly with early types of the ancient Greek alphabet (especially with Anatolian and Italic), and secondly with Northern SemiticPhoenician (including with early Aramaic) and S.Semitic alphabets43. In some measure it agrees with the archeological data about deep cultural ties of the Southern Siberia and Jeti-Su early nomads with the Near East population in the 1st millennium BC. The Aramaic alphabet as a branch of the Phoenician alphabet has also some similarity with the Trkic runic alphabet, though apparently they both are only in an indirect relationship. The graphic affinity of the Gothic (Common German) and Trkic runic characters, in some instances also supported by coincidence of the sound values, can be explained by their link with the writing system of the ancient Greek or even earlier alphabetic writing. The rich arsenal of graphic characters of the Trkic runes could be produced only during a long period of development. These alphabetical characters, certainly, were not individually assembled from early Mediterranean alphabets. It is hardly possible to view the early Semitic, ancient Greek, Italic, and Anatolian analogies in this alphabet to be direct loans, because apparently existed an older common source of the alphabetical writing. The Trkic runic alphabet as a whole does not ascend to anyone of the early Mediterranean alphabets known to us, despite the genetic links of some letters.

The Trkic runic alphabet presents a very rich and quite independently developed graphic system. It would be totally erroneous to depict it as a product of a personal creation. The close genetic links of the Trkic runic characters with the early Semitic, ancient Greek, Italic (Etruscan, Picenian, Messapian, Venetian, Retian) and Anatolian (Karian, Lician, Lidian, Sidetian) letters exist because the Trkic runic alphabet underwent a very long period of development, and it apparently ascends directly to the most ancient common source of alphabetic writing. Such a source could be an early logographic or alphabetic script of the 3rd - 2nd millennia BC. It should be noted that a language, being a main social factor and a major ethnic attribute (the language of the autochthonous population), has to be invariably considered in the studies of the ethnic, historical and cultural communities in the Central Asia. A convinced proponent of the autochthony of the Trkic-speaking population in the Central Asia (based on clearly traced continuity of archeological cultures of the Neolith epoch, Bronze and Early Iron epochs in the territory of Southern Siberia and Kazakhstan) was . Kh. Margulan44. The language contacts in this region are very deep and diverse. The Trks for millennia communicated not only with rest of the Altai language world, but also with the carriers of various Indo-European languages. It can't be excluded that the problem of the Trkic alphabet in one way or another is linked with the hypothesis about a most ancient genetic commonality of Trkic languages with the IndoEuropean languages, which is receiving an increasing linguistic evidence45, and has atendency to develop into a general question about the origin of the alphabet.
295 296

Table 3. Genetic links of Trkic runes.

Note 46. Abbrevia tions in Table 3 "Genetic links of Trkic runes":

Aram. Aramaic

alphabet (branch of Phoenicia n Semitic), Greek eastern branch of ancient Greek alphabet, Ven. Venet alphabet (version of Etruscan) , Greek. ancient Greek alphabet, W.Greek western branch of the ancient Greek alphabet, Kar. Karian alphabet, Lid. Lidian alphabet, Lic. Lician alphabet, Mes. Messap alphabet, Pit. Picen alphabet, Ret. Retian alphabet (a version of Etruscan) , Sid. Sidian alphabet, Phoen. Phoenicia n (N.Semiti c) alphabet, Etr. -

Etruscan alphabet, S.Sem. S.Semitic alphabets .

A comparison of the Ancient Trkic runes with related alphabetical characters of the early Mediterranean alphabetical scripts is shown in Table 3, which can be viewed as a working plan for future studies46. In the table the Trkic runic characters (graphemes) are grouped in accordance with the transpiring paleographical and phonological links, which allows to track down the evolution of the Trkic runic alphabet from original few initial signs to the extremely rich and complete graphic system, which reflects a long developmental history of the Ancient Trkic language phonetic system, and at the same time displaying a genetic (material) affinity with the early Mediterranean alphabets. The characters for vowels in the Trkic runic alphabet, as is known, were polyphonic. The identical signs designated non-labial broad vowel phonemes a and , non-labial narrow vowel phonemes and i, firm labial phonemes o and u, soft labial phonemes and . In the most ancient inscription on the Ili vessel discussed above, the labial vowel phonemes were transmitted by the same character i. Hence, initially the characters for firm and soft labial vowels were not differentiated. The comparative analysis suggests that Trkic runic characters for the vowels ascend to the common prototype , which once was designating an initial slotted consonant of the *h type (probably, a variation of a phoneme *k) in front of different vowels. This initial sound (apparently, it ascends to a common Altaic *p-) (Translator assumes that the author is using Latin letter symbology, and not Greek/Cyrillic, thus *p and not *r) was not found in the language of the ancient Trkic runic inscriptions, but its traces are found in some Trkic languages47. A gradual loss of a consonant *h- in the language of tribes that inherited the ancient written tradition, caused emergence and subsequent separation of the sounds for the vowel archephonems A (a, ), I (, i) and U (o, u, , ), possibly under an influence of close characters for consonants Trkic runic characters k, j, and , i, b. At the same time, , (from , , ,

comes , u) reveal a close genetic link with the characters for consonants '(a), j, w in the Semitic alphabets.
297

The letter designations for the firm and soft variations of consonant phonemes in the Trkic runic alphabet, as was already noted, frequently underwent neutralization (except for q and k'). Moreover, the letter designations for firm and soft variations of consonant phonemes are usually also connected genetically. For example, the runic character b developed from b', runic j developed from j', runic n developed n'. Therefore in a historical perspective makes sense to examine the Trkic runic characters for the consonants as graphic symbols for phonemes, irrespective of their sound implementation in a word. The Trkic runic characters for consonant phonemes can be broken into three internally connected paleographic groups: 1) signs for bilabial plosive consonant phonemes b, p, m; 2) signs for alveolar plosive consonant phonemes d, t, z, s, . , n, l, r, and palatal approximant consonant phoneme j; 3) signs for velar plosive consonant phonemes g, k, . The signs on the first group go back to their prototypes b' (~ *') and m. The affinity of tracings of these prototypes, apparently, is caused by ancient phonetic conformity b (p)~m. The prospective primary source - a graphic logogram bel "fish", compare Tuva bel " taymen (fish)", Khakass. pil "taymen (fish)". It can't be missed that the Phoenician Orkhon b' and Talas b'. d ' (~ l', b represents a later b',

graphic development in comparison with the Yenisei

Characters of the second group include prototypes *t ') d(~*t), r', and j'. z(~*s), , with signs for ), n', and also rather archaic signs for

(compare

Among these characters show up sometimes ancient graphic logograms tri ( Sumer. diir) "Sky; God, deity", compare Kazakh. tir, tiri "God" or zegir "great, high, highest",

Karakalpak. di aspanda "very high, up in the sky" (phonetic transition t~d~z in the beginning of a word); adaq "leg (legs); azuq "food, provisions, nutrient" (image of pasture, foliage), as-a "meal, food " (image of a grain ear), compare Altaic. a (ash) "food; wheat (in ears) ", Kirgiz. ash "food; fruits (of wild plants)"; ip, bq "twig, thin flexible branch"; en "bottom, descent"; el "hand, palm of a hand"; Khakas. ires "screw".
298

er "drill", compare

The characters of the third group include prototypes (~*k'), (~ *q) and q (comp. Phoenician

g' h,

kh), fairly archaic in form characters for k' (with , ), q (with o, u), q (with ), and also separate signs for velar nasal phoneme . Look like initial the graphic logograms *egeg "file, abrader", compare Tuva egee (g), Kazakh. egeu "file, abrader", ege- "to grind with a file"; fishing tackle, net"; a ""trap, snare, e "face, cheeks".

It is important to note that the phonological differentiation in sonority-aphonity of voiced consonants (b~p, d~t, z~s, g~k) in the Trkic runic alphabet is reflected very unusually. As the comparative analysis shows, almost all runic characters for voiceless consonants (p, t, s, k', q) ultimately are derivatives from the runic characters for corresponding sonorous consonants. For example, the Trkic runic characters (compare p, p ', t ', t k'

t in the fifth rock inscription of Hoyto-Tamir), s',

and q have developed respectively from signs for b' (~ *p'), d' (~ *t'), d (~ *t), z (~ *s), g' (~ *k') and (~ *q). However, the Orkhon runic characters t appear to be primordial, probably ascending to a graphic logogram ta "dawn".
299

Thus, some prototypes of the Ancient Trkic runes appear to be indigenous and, most likely, developed from initial Trkic pictorial

logograms, sympbols for words. The Trkic runic characters for phonetic combinations lt, rt and nt n have no direct analogies in any of the ancient alphabets. Their prospective prototypes are graphic logograms alt "bottom, lower part",

art "upland, mountain; mountain pass", ant~and "swear, oath" (image of skull) or and "rim of a sieve, a strainer". The genetic link of Orkhon sign for (nj) with the Orkhon-Yenisean symbol for n is confirmed by ancient phonetic correspondence of (nj)~n. And finally, the symbols for word separation in Trkic runic inscriptions ( diverse notation for the breaks between words) display greater variety than the corresponding Phoenician, Ancient Greek, Karian and Etruscan scripts. The paleographic and phonologic links of the Trkic runic characters (graphemes) attest a long evolution of the Trkic runic script in a development process of the Ancient Trkic language, which was generally completed not later than the 4th - 1st millennia BC. Consequently, the Trkic runic alphabet, which history and genetic links are receiving principally new interpretation, can become an extremely important source for historical phonetics of the Trkic languages.
300
References for Chapter 10

300
1. Tychsen O.N. Schreiben an Pallas 19 Febr. 1786 ber alte unbekannte Steinschrift in Sibirien, " Neue nordliche Beitrage ", vol. V, SPb., 1793, pp. 237-245; Spassky G.I. Notes about Siberian antiquities. Ancient Siberian inscriptions, "Siberian bulletin ", SPb., 1818, p. 13-14; Vostokov A. About similarity of the tracings found in Siberia on stones, to those found in Germany. " The Siberian bulletin ", SPb., 1824, ch. I, p. 1-8 (translation and comment of the review by G.Rommel from " Gottingische gelehrte Anzeigen ", 204, 1823 - " De antiquis quisbusdam sculpturis et inscriptionibus in Sibiria repertis ", Petropoli, 1822); Klaproth J. Memoires relatifs a V Asie. (Sur quelques antiquites de la Siberie). Paris, 1824, p. 159; Priests N. About runic letters in Minusinsk territory. " News of Siberian department of Russian geographical society ", vol. 5, 2, Irkutsk, 1874, p. 53-55; Donner . Inscriptions en caracteres de Flenissei. Systeme d'ecriture. Langue. - " Inscriptions de Orkhon recueillies par fexpedition Finnoise, 1890 et publiees par la Societe Finno-Ougrienne ", Helsingfors, 1892, pp. XL-XLIV (XXXIX-XLIX). 2. Yadrintsev H.M. Report of expedition to Orkhon in 1889 on behalf of the Eastern - Siberian Department of the Imperial Geographical society (a geographical diary). - Collection of works of Orkhon expedition, I, SPB., 1892, p. 106.

3 Thomsen W. Deciphering of Orkhon and Yenisei inscriptions. "Notes of Eastern branch of Russian Archeological Society " (ZVO Russian Archeological Society), vol. VIII, issue III - IV, SPb., 1894, p. 332 (V.R.Rozen translation from French, Thomsen W. Dechiffrement des inscriptions de Orkhon et de Yenissei. Notice preliminaire, Extrai du "Bulletin de Akademie R. des Sciences et des Lettres de Danemark, 1893, N 3, Copenhague, 1894). 4 Schifner A. ber verschiedene sibirische Eigentums-Zeichen, "Melanges russe ", vol.. IV, 1858, p. 2. 5 Thomsen W. Deciphering of Orkhon and Yenisei inscriptions, p. 337; "To talk definitely about the origin of our alphabet would be premature. I shall allow myself to only address the similarity of some letters with the letters signs of the (Semito-) Pehlevi alphabet"; Tomsen W. Inscriptions de Orkhon dechiffrees. " Memoires de la Societe Finno-Ougrienne " (MSFOu), V, Helsingfors, 18941896, pp. 49-50; Tomsen W. V alphabet runiforme Turc. Samlede Afhandlinger, III Bind, Kobenhavn, 1922, pp. 73-77.

300
6 Klyashtorny S.G. Ancient Trkic runic monuments as a source on a history of Central Asia. ., 1964, p. 49. 7 Donner O. Sur Toriine de Palphabet turc du nord de G Asie, "Journal de la Societe FinnoOugrienne" (JSFOu), XIV, 1, Helsingfors, 1896, pp. 17, 21, 70. 8 Jensen H. Die Schrift in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart, 2. neubearbeitete und erweiterte Auflage, Berlin 1958, pp. 343-344, Abb. 343. 9 Altheim F. Geschichte der Hunnen, Bd. 1, Kapitel 11 (" Hunnische und alttrkische Runen "), Berlin, 1959, pp. 284-286, 437. 10 Here we agree with S.G.Kljashtorny, compare Klyashtorny S.G. Ancient Trkic runic monuments as a source on a history of Central Asia, p. 46. 11 Aristov N. Ethnic structure of Kirghiz - cossacks of the Big Horde and Karakirgizes from genealogical legends and existing clan divisions and clan tamgas, and also history and beginning of anthropological research. "Live olde", issue III - IV, SPB., 1894, p. 419-420; Aristov N. Notes about ethnic structure of Trkic tribes and nations, and their number. "Live olde", issue III - IV, SPb., 1896, p. 418, 420. 12 Mallitsky N. Link of Trkic tamgas with Orkhon letters. " Records of Trkestani circle of archeology fans ", year III, Tashkent, 1897-1898, p. 43-47. 13 Sokolov A. From stone to press. "Culture and writing of the East", Baku, 1928, II, p. 116, 118. 14 Batmanov I.A. and Kunaa A.Ch. Monuments of Ancient Trkic writing in Tuva, issue I. Kyzyl, 1963, p. 8. 15 Tomsen W. L'alphabet runiforme Turc, pp. 78 - 79. 16 Polivanov E.D. Ideographic motive in formation of the Orkhon alphabet. A reprint from "Bulletin of the Central Asian state university" (Tashkent), 9, 1925, p. 177-179. "Alphabetical etymologies ( oq, aj) demonstrate that these letters were created only in the Turkish society, relying upon the Turkish language of the script... ", - wrote in the same place E.D.Polivanov. 17 Emre A. . Eski trk yazisinin menegi. Istanbul, 1938, s. 19, 48, 50-52. 18 Clauson G. The origin of the Trkish "runic" alphabet. " Acta rientalia " (Havniae), XXXII, 1970, pp. 55, 59-60.

19 Critical analysis of these hypotheses see: Amanjolov A.S. Materials and research for history of the Ancient Trkic writing. Author's abstract of the Doctor Dissertation. Alma-Ata, 1975, p. 5457.

301
20 Livshits V.A. Origin of Ancient Trkic runic writing. SPb. "Ethnic, historical and cultural links of Trkic peoples of the USSR. Theses of reports and messages. All-Union Trkological conference, 27 - 29 September, 1976 ", Alma-Ata, 1976, p. 64. 21 Ibid, p. 68-69 (table). 22 Amanjolov A.S. Once more about Irtysh runic inscription, "Bulletin of Kazakh SSR Academy of Sciences", 1967, 9 (269), p. 66-70; Amanjolov A.S. Runic-like inscription from Saka burial near Alma-Ata, "Bulletin of Kazakh SSR Academy of Sciences", 1971, 12 (320), p. 64-66; Amanjolov A.S. Trkic runic graphics, Ch. III (exponents - Irtysh, Ili and Syr-Darya inscriptions). Alma-Ata, 1985, p. 5-16, 31-39. 23 Amanjolov A.S. An "Ancient Greek " inscription from Alma-Ata region, "Oriental Archive" (Praha), 1967, 35/1, pp. 89-94; Amanzh1v A. S. Forefather goat or ancient Trkic inscription in early Greek alphabet, "Oriental Archive" (Praha), 1974, 42/1, pp. 33-36. 24 Main provisions of this principally new development of the subject were published, see: Amanjolov A.S. History of the Trkic runic alphabet. Coll. "Kazaktsh men edebiet" ["Kazakh language and literature"], issue 5, Alma-Ata, 1974, p. 98-100; Amanjolov A.S. Problem of origin of the Trkic runic alphabet. Coll. " The cossack tsh men 1 " ["Kazakh language and literature "], issue 8, Alma-Ata, 1976, p. 59-71; Amanjolov A.S. Genesis of Trkic runes. "Questions of linguistics", 1978, 2, p. 76 - 87. 25 Malov S.E. Monuments of Ancient Trkic writing in Mongolia and Kirghizia. M. - L., 1959, p. 63, 74-75. 26 Neike1 H. J. Altertumer aus dem Tale des Tala in Trkestan. "Travaux ethnographiques de la Societe Finno-Ougrienne", VII, Helsinki, 1918, II: 1 and II: 14. 27 Vinnik D.N., Kojemyako P. N. Monuments of Ancient Trkic writing of Ayrtam-Oy valley. Coll. "New epigraphic finds in Kirghizia (1961)", Frunze, 1962, p. 9-10. 28 Convincing critics of such statements which contradict obvious facts, see: Batmanov I.A. Dating of Yenisei monuments of the Ancient Trkic writing, "Scientific notes of Tuva NIIYALI ", X, Kyzyl, 1963, p. 294. 29 I.V. Basic concepts of Trkic runic paleography, "Soviet Trkology", 1975, 2, p. 38, 45, 47. 30 Ibid, p. 45. 31 This subject is covered with more detail in Chapter I of this monograph, partly in former publications, see: Amanjolov A.S. Graphics of Talass, Yenisei and Orkhon inscriptions, Coll. "Kazak tili men aedebieti", 3, Alma-Ata, 1973, p. 16-26; Amanjolov A.S. Interpretation of some runic characters, "Scientific notes of Tuva NIIYALI", XVI, Kyzyl, 1973, p. 163-168; Amanjolov A.S. Trkic runic graphics (methodical development). Alma-Ata, 1980 [P. I].

302

32 M . E. Monuments of the Ancient Trkic writing of Mongolia and Kirgizia. M. - L., 1959, p. 74.

33 Ginzburg V.V. Anthropological characteristic of the Kazakhstan population during Bronze Epoch. Works IIAE Academy of Sciences KazSSR, vol. I, Alma-Ata, 1956, p. 159, 170-171; Ginzburg V.V. Anthropology materials of ancient population of southeast Kazakhstan. - Works IIAE Academy of Sciences KazSSR, vol. 7, Alma-Ata, 1959, p. 269; Ismagulov O. Anthropological characteristics of Jeti-Su Usuns. - Works IIAE Academy of Sciences KazSSR, vol. 16, Alma-Ata, 1962, p. 176, 187, 190-192; Ismagulov O. Kazakhstan population from an Bronze Epoch to modernity (paleoanthropological research). Alma-Ata, 1970, p. 4, 10, 19, 37-38. 34 Bernshtam A.N. Most ancient Trkic elements in ethnogenesis of Central Asia. "Soviet Ethnography" (collection of articles), VI - VII, M. - L., 1947, p. 148. 35 Ibid, p. 148-149, etc. 36 Marx . and Engels F. Selected letters. M., I947, p. 73. 37 Gumilev L.N. Hunnu. Middle Asia during ancient times. M, 1960, p. 39-40. 38 Hirth F. Nachworte zur Inschrift des Tonjukuk. In: Radloff W. Diealttiirkischen Inschriften der Mongolei. Zweite Folge. SPb., 1899, S. 49. 39 Shiratori . ber die Wu-sun Stamm in Zentralasien. " Keleti Szemle " (Budapest), 1902, 23, pp. 103-140. 40 Aristov N.A. Notes about ethnic structure of Trkic tribes and nations and their number, p.

17.

41 Zuev . I. Question of language of ancient Usuns. "Bulletin of Academy of Sciences KazSSR ", No 5 (146), 1957, p. 73. 42 Gryaznov M.P. Connections of Southern Siberia nomads with Central Asia and Near East in 1st millennium BC "Materials of Second meeting of archeologists and ethnographers of Central Asia". M. - L., 1959, p. 142; Rudenko S.I. Art of Altai and Near East (Middle of the 1st millennium BC). ., 1961, p. 64; Mannay-ool M. X. New materials of Scythian time in Tuva (Materials of archeological research TNIIYALI), issue IX, Kyzyl, 1964, p. 278-284. 43 Comparison material, besides Trkological material, was from the following studies of general and specific nature: Shampolion J.-F. Egyptian hieroglyphic alphabet. Translation, edition and comments by I.G.Livshits. Publ. USSR Academy of Sciences, 1950; Wiedemann F. Begining of historical Greek writing. Research in the field of most ancient Greek alphabet. Leipzig, 1908 (1910); Thompson E. M. An Introduction to Greek and Latin Palaeography. Oxford, 1912; Driver G. R. Semitic Writing from Pictograph to Alphabet. London, 1948; Gelb L. J. Study of Writing. Foundation of Grammatology. London, 1952; Diringer D. Alphabet. Key to the History of Mankind. London, 1953; Diringer D. Writing. London, 1962; Moorhouse A. . The Triumph of the Alphabet. A History of Writing. New York, 1953; Friedrich J. Entzifferung verschollener Schriften und Sprachen, Berlin, 1954; Jensen . Die Schrift in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart, 2. neubearbeitete und erweiterte Auflage, Berlin, 1958; Cohen M. La grande invention de reeriture et son evolution. Paris, 1958; Shifman I.S. Phoenician language. ., 1963; Istrin V.A. Emergence and development of writing. ., 1965 (2nd revised edition); Shevoroshkin V.V. Research in decoding of Karian inscriptions. ., 1965; Makaev E.A. Language of the most ancient runic inscriptions. The linguistic and historical philological analysis. ., 1965; Friedrich J. Geschichte der Schrift. Unter besonderer Bercksichtung ilrer geistigen Entwickltmg. Heidelberg, 1966; Fldes-Papp . Vom Felsbild zurn Alphabet. Die geschichte der Schrift von ihren frhesten

Vorstufen bis zur modernen lateinischen Schreibshrift. Stuttgart, 1966; Bauer . M. Language of S.Arabian writing. ., 1966; Shevoroshkin V.V. Lidian language. ., 1967; Shevoroshkin V. V. Zur Entstehmg und Entwicklung der kleinasiatischen Buchstabenschriften. "Kadmos" (Berlin), Bd. VII, 2, 1968, pp. 150-173.

303
44 Margulan A.H. Begazy-Dandyb Culture of Central Kazakhstan. Alma-Ata, 1979, p. 21. 45 Ramstedt . J. The relation of the Altaic languages to other language groups. Extrait du " Journal de la Societe Finno-Ougrienne ", LIII, Helsinki, 1947, p. 23: "In my view equally good reasons could be found for attempting to link together the Altaic and Indo-European languages"; Emre A. C. Le probleme de la parente des langues turques et indo-europeennes. Ankara, 1960; (A.J. Emre addressed up to 40 cases of most ancient Indoeuropean-Trkic lexical concordances); Dulzon A.P. Hypothesis about remote relationship of the Uralo-Altai languages with Indo-European. Coll. "Origin of Siberia natives and their languages" (Materials of interuniversity conference 11 - 13 May, 1969), Tomsk, 1969, p. 108 - 110; Petrov K.I. Genetical relationship of the Altai and Indo-European languages. Ibid, p. 110 - 112. 46 Abbreviations in Table 3 "Genetical links of Trkic runes": see Table 3

304

47 Ryasyanen M. Materials for historical phonetics of Trkic languages, ., 1955, p. 24 - 25; Baskakov N.A. Trkic languages (General and typological characteristics), "Languages of the USSR peoples", II - Trkic languages, ., 1966, p. 17; Doerfer G. Bemerkungen zur Methodik der turkischen Lautlehre, " Orientalistische Literaturzeitung ", (Berlin), LXVI, 7/8,1971, p. 335. Existence of proto-Trkic initial consonant of type *h (*k) is definitely confirmed by the Khalage material, see: Derfer, Research status of Khalage group of languages. Questions of linguistics, 1972, 1, and other works. Also compare: ancient-Trkic ara "interval, middle" and Chuvash. khusha "gap between objects", ancient-Trkic egri "1) curved, uneven, bent; 2) indirect: false, lying, wrong; 3) curvature", and Chuvash. kuker " 1) curved, bent, crooked; 2) dishonest, dishonestly; 3) curvature, bend, corner, turn, bow", ancient-Trkic in "1) rest; quiet; 2) quietly ", and Chuvash. kana "rest, calmness, breather, convenience" (formed from verb kan- "to rest, resting"), ancient-Trkic a "1) sour, bitter; 2) indirect. bitter, insulting; 3) noun, indirect bitterness, bitter", and Chuvash. kacha "term for anything very spicy, bitter", ancient-Trkic auq "ankle joint, anklebone" and Khakass. khazykh "knucklebone, anklebone", ancient-Trkic r " 1) emptiness, empty space; 2) hollow".

305

GENESIS OF TURKIC RUNIC ALPHABET Conclusion and Bibliography

A.S. AMANJOLOV HISTORY of ANCIENT TURKIC SCRIPT Almaty, "Mektep", 2003
Introduction The original bibliography of the A. Amanjolov monograph includes a large quantity of references transcribed in quasi-Cyrillic alphabet cooked individually by Russians for each Turkic administrative subdivision, after their sequential state prohibition and expulsion from the Turkic culture, of first the Arabic, and then the Latin alphabet. All the efforts were made in the translation to re-transcribe them back to a common Turkic alphabet, but because the same grapheme may be used differently in various Turkic Soviet and postSoviet alphabets, the accuracy of each word transcription is unknown, though for a Turkicfluent person the meaning should be clear in all cases. My apologies for any inconvenience. The translation retained a Cyrillic alphabetical sequence of the original, a little different from the customary Latin, to ease the cross-reference with the Russian-lingual original. The Latin-based part of the Bibliography retained as in the original. The Conclusion of the book summarizes the main theses in so few and clear sentences which could be composed only by a great master with an intricate knowledge and a cl ear perception of the subject. CONCLUSION 1. The Ancient Trkic runic script (Trkic runes) is closely connected with the history of ancient Trkic -speaking tribes social and cultural development in Tian -Shan, Sayan-Altai and Khangay mountains. The distri bution area and chronological frameworks of Trkic runes correlate with the Ancient Trkic statehood of the 6th -10th centuries. At the same time, the sources of this process go much deeper. The linguistic particularities of Ancient Trkic runic monuments reflect a period of development of all live Trkic languages. The language of the Trkic runes, being a written literary language, developed on the basis of close dialects of the ancient tribes now composing the ethnic mix of many Trkic peoples. The Trki c runes furnish valuable material about ideology of the ancient hunter -animal husbandry tribes of the Central Asia. The early beliefs of the Trkic -speaking tribes found reflection in closely bound cults of nature and patron ancestors, zoolatry and totemis m. In second half of the 1st millennium AD the ancient Trks experienced strong influence of Buddhism, Manichaeism, and Christianity of Nestorian variety (i.e. Tengrianism, called Nestorianism by Christian clergy), which frequently resulted in change of re ligious views and, as a rule, change of writing. Finally, in the Western and Eastern Turkestan at the turn of the 1st - 2nd millennia AD diffused Islam ideology and Arabic alphabet. 2. The graphics of Talas, Yenisei and Orkhon inscriptions shows that the Trkic runic alphabet was well adapted to t he sound system of Ancient Trkic language. The vowel phonemes and , and i, o and u, and were symbolized by four polyphonic letters, the use of which was frequently facultative (depending on a position of a vowel phoneme in a word). The consonant phonemes b, p, d, t, z, s, , , m, n, l, r, j, g, k, (and partly their variations) were symbolized by thirty one letter. Under influence of vowel harmony of syllable and word, the Trkic runic script developed a graphical opposition of hard and soft va riations of consonant phonemes b, d, t, s, , n, l, r, j, g (~g'), k (q~k'). Nevertheless, the "paired" consonants quite often were subjected to

neutralization, i.e. were partially interchangeable. An exception was a "paired" letters for sound versions of the consonant phoneme k (q~k'), which sometimes had additional graphical differentiation for labial syllable -forming vowel (the consonant q with non -labial narrow vowel also could receive a special designation). The consonant phonemes p, z, , m, were s ymbolized by "unary" consonants, i.e. irrespective of positional voiced variations. Thus, in the Trkic runic (Orkhon -YEnisean) alphabet were 35 letters, represented by different graphical variations. In addition, special signs were for combinations of co nsonants lt, rt, nt, n. Some Trkic runic characters brought new interpretations. 306 3. The graphics of Talas, Yenisei and Orkhon runic inscriptions was mostly studied by us from originals (and the Orkhon inscriptions partly from pictures), which allow ed to verify tracings, transcription, and translation of some of them. The monograph includes verified epigraphic materials, and partly studies of the Talas, Yenisei and Orkhon runes. For example, are reviewed in detail three Yenisei inscriptions published by the author (on a Chinese bronze coin of 759, on a heart -shaped pebble, and on a stele found by A.N.Lipsky), offered a decoding of a runic inscription on a Talas stick, corrected the reading of some Talas (and Chu's) runic inscriptions, given new readin g for three large Orkhon inscriptions (monument in honor of Kl -Tegin, Ongin monument, Tonkuk monument). 4. New epigraphic finds in the territory of Kazakhstan (Irtysh, Ili, Syr -Darya, Yaik) allow to reveal most ancient monuments of written culture of t he Trkic -speaking peoples' remote ancestors. On a bone circle with an image of a flying deer from a kurgan of the 5th - 4th centuries BC in the r. Irtysh valley was found and read a most ancient Trkic (proto - Trkic) runic inscription "White Deer". Apparently, this sacral inscription was devoted to a zoomorphic solar deity of the ancient "Scythians" in the Central Asia. This inscription is one of two earliest documentarily confirmed inscriptions in the history of the Trkic runic alphabet. The second proto- Trkic inscription is runic -like inscription on a silver cup from Issyk kurgan of the 5th - 4th centuries BC in the valley of the r. Ili. In time they are probably close to the runic inscriptions on the rocks in the r. Ili valley, an inscription on a clay seal from Seyhun (Syr-Darya), an inscription on a Bronze mirror from the r. Yaik, some Talas inscriptions (especially a runic inscription on a wooden stick) and some Yenisei inscriptions on the so-called deer stones. Most of the Trkic runic inscriptions from Yenisei, Irtysh, Ili, Seyhun (Syr-Darya) and Talas, and the inscriptions from Mongolia, are made in the second half of the 1st millennium AD. 5. As the epigraphic finds show, in the valley of r. Ili, in the 1st millennium AD the ancient Trkic tribe s in Tian-Shan used not only the Trkic runic, but also the ancient Greek alphabet (direction of writing from right to left). Apparently, the ancient Greek alphabet was inherited by the ancient Trks from Sakas and Tochars -Buddhists. The presence among the ancient Trks of the typical for the middle of the 1st millennium BC ancient Greek alphabet, along with the Trkic runic alphabet, which apparently arose not later than the middle of the 1st millennium BC, unequivocally points to an amazing concurrence of the historical fates of these closely related alphabets in the r. Ili valley, and testifies to the most ancient written tradition of Trkic -speaking tribes. 6. For the history of writing, in our opinion, important role play pictograms, ideograms and other early written signs of Kazakhstan and Southern Siberia, which belong to the Neolith, Bronze and Early Iron (4th - 1st millennia BC) epochs. The early types of writing (pictography, ideography), attested in the territory of Kazakhstan, reflect stages of t he

proto- Trkic civilization development under indispensable organizing role of language and writing. The most ancient Kazakhstan rock symbols in the Late Bronze and Early Iron epochs, engraved with dot techniques, in some instances border on the initial graphics of some Ancient Trkic runes. Exposed through a prism of most ancient language contracts, the mysterious "Sumer" Trkic lexical congruencies and graphical logograms find a convincing confirmation from the positions of historical phonetics of Trk ic languages. 7. The paleographic analysis of the Ancient Trkic runes, in turn, leads to a conclusion about very early forming date for the Trkic runic alphabet in Southern Siberia and Jeti -Su, not later than the middle of the 1st millennium BC. This al phabet reveals a close genetic linkage, first, with the early types of the ancient Greek alphabet (especially with Anatolian and Italic), and secondly, with the Northern Semitic -Phoenician (including the early Aramean) and S.Semitic alphabets. At the same time, the Trkic runic alphabet represents a very rich and expressly developed independently graphic system. The close genetic linkage of the Trkic runic characters with the early Semitic, ancient Greek, Italic and Anatolian letters demonstrate that the Trkic runic alphabet underwent a long path of development, and apparently it ascends to the most ancient common source of alphabetic writing. A conjectured primary source was an original logographic (ideographic) or alphabetic script of the 3rd - 2nd millennia BC. It is very probable that some prototypes of Ancient Trkic runes descend from primeval Trkic graphic logograms, the signs for the words. For a solution of the problem of the Trkic runic alphabet origin, a great importance acquires the hypothes is about a most ancient genetic unity of Trkic languages with the Indo -European languages. The paleographical and phonological relations of the Trkic runic characters (graphemes) attest to extended evolution of the Trkic runic alphabet, which reflected the original process of becoming a sound system for the ancient Trkic language. Consequently, the problem of the origin (genesis) of the Trkic runic alphabet is closely bound not only with the questions of Ancient Trkic ethnogenesis and the history of culture of Ancient Trkic tribes, but also with the problems of historical phonetics of the Trkic languages. BIBLIOGRAPHY Translated Section (Cyrillic and quasi -Cyrillic to English)

A
Abaev V.I. Oset language and folklore, I, M.-L., 1949. Abaev V.I. Historico-etymological dictionary of Ossetian language, vol. I (A -K), M.-L., 1958. Abramzon S. M. Semantics of the Kirgiz ethnonyms. "Soviet Ethnography", 1946, No 6. Abramzon S.M. Forms of family at pre- Trk and Trkic tribes of Southern Siberia, Jeti -Su and Tian-Shan in antiquity and Middle Ages. "Trkological Collection", 1972 , ., 1973, p. 287 - 305. Abramzon S.M. Kirgizes and their ethnogenetic, historical, and cultural links. Frunze, 1990 (text of the first edition - L., 1971). Adrianov I.V. Archeology of the Western Altai (Trip to Semipalatinsk area in 1911), "News of the archeologicalal commission", issue 62, Petrograd, 1916. Aydarov Gh. Kne trki jazuly syntas. "Bulletin of KazSSR Academy of Sciences", 1963, No 2, p. 77-79. Aydarov Gh. Language of Bilge-Kagan Orkhon monument. Alma-Ata, 1966.

Aydarov Gh. Tonkuk eskertkish indegi Kazak tiline katysty of mother-aldar. "Kazak tili tarihi men dialektologiyasynyn, mceleleri", 5 -shyghuy, Almaty, 1966. Aydarov Gh. One more find of Orkhon-YEnisean inscription. "Epygraphics of the East", XIX, L., 1969, p. 106-108. Aydarov Gh. Langu age of Orkhon monuments of Ancient Trkic inscriptions of 8 century. Alma-Ata, 1971. Aydarov Gh., Kryshjanov E., Tomanov M. Kne trki jazba eskertkishterinin tili. Almaty, 1971. Aydarov Gh. Kne trki jazba eskertkishterinin tili. Almaty, 1986. Aylyarov Sh. S. Some questions of phonetics of modern Turkish literary language. Coll. "Problems of Trkic philology", ., 1966, p. 3 -73. Akishev K.A., Kushaev G.I. Ancient culture of Sakas and Usuns in the valley of r. Ili, Alma Ata, 1963. Akishev K.A. Kurgan Issy k. ., 1978. Akchokrakly L. Tatar tamgas in Crimea. (Materials of scientific ethnographic expedition studying Tatar culture in Crimea, 1925). Simferopol, 1927. Alektorov A. E. From the world of Kirgiz superstitions. (Baksy). Kazan, 1899. Alpysbaev Kh. A. New petroglyph of Bostandyk area. Works of IIAE KazSSR Academy of Sciences, vol. I, (Archeology), Alma-Ata, 1956, p. 182-188. Amanjolov S. New alphabet and spelling of Kazakh literary language. Alma -Ata, 1940. Amanjolov S. Kazaktyn edebi tili. Almaty, 1949. Amanjolov S., Amanjolov A.S. Petroglyphs on Bugytas rocks. "Bulletin of KazSSR Academy of Sciences", 1956, No 4, p. 97 - 100. Amanjolov S.A. Monuments of Ancient Trkic writing and their relation to modern Trkic languages. "Materials of First All -Union conference of Orientalists in Tashkent 4 -11 June, 1957", Tashkent, 1958, p. 828-836. Amanjolov S. Problems of dialectology and history of the Kazakh language. Alma -Ata, 1959 (2nd revised edition - Almaty, 1997). Amanjolov A.S. Petroglyphs of Utegen gorge. "Bulletin of KazSSR Academy of Sciences", 1959, No 10 (175), p. 52-61. Amanjolov . [S.]. Jazu derimiz. "Kazak edebieti", No 51 (778), 17.12.1965. Amanjolov A.S. Ancient inscriptions and petroglyphs of Ketmen (Tien Shan)ridge . "News of KazSSR Academy of Sciences, public series", 1966, No 5, p. 79 - 96. Amanjolov A.S. Once more about Irtysh runic inscriptions. "Bulletin of KazSSR Academy of Sciences", 1967, No 9 (269), p. 66-70. Amanjolov A.S. Two runic inscriptions from Syr -Daria. "Bulletin of KazSSR Academy of Sciences", 1969, No 1 (285), p. 72-74. Amanjolov A.S. Ili runic inscriptions, "Problems of linguistics", 1969, No 3, p. 147 - 151. Amanjolov A.S. Verbal treatment in the language of Ancient Trkic monuments. ., 1969. Amanjolov A.S. Question of conformance of s/sh in Ancient Trkic dialects. Coll. "Study of Uigur language", 2, Alma-Ata, 1970, p. 167-169. Amanjolov A.S. Runic inscription on a Bronze ring (r. Ili). "Bulletin of KazSSR Academy of Sciences", 1971, No 1 (309), p. 64-66. Amanjolov A.S. Runic-like inscription from Saka's burial near Alma-Ata. "Bulletin of KazSSR Academy of Sciences", 1971, No 12 (320), p. 64 -66. Amanjolov A.S . Early alphabetic writing of Trkic -speaking tribes. Coll. "Kazak tili men edebieti meseleleri ["Questions of Kazakh language and literature"], VIII, Alma -Ata, 1971, p. 24 - 33. Amanjolov A.S. Interpretation of some runic characters. "Scientific notes of Tuva NIIYALI", issue XVI, Kyzyl, 1973, p. 163 - 168. Amanjolov A.S. Graphics of Talas, Yenisei and Orkhon inscriptions. Coll. "Kazak tili men edebieti" ["Kazakh language and literature"], issue 3, Alma -Ata, 1973, p. 16 - 26. Amanjolov A.S. Two Yenisei runic inscriptions. "Scientific notes of Khakass NIIYALI", issue XIX, historical series, No 5, Abakan, 1974, p. 137 -140.

Amanjolov A.S. Most ancient rock signs in Kazakhstan. Coll. "Kazak tili men edebieti" ["Kazakh language and literature"], issue 4, Alma -Ata, 1974, p. 44-48. Amanjolov A.S. History of Trkic runic alphabet. Coll. "Kazak tili men edebieti" ["Kazakh language and literature"] issue 5, Alma-Ata, 1974, p. 98-100. Amanjolov A.S. Corrected Yenisei inscriptions. Coll. "Kazak tili men edebieti" ["Kazak h language and literature"], issue 5, Alma-Ata, 1974, p. 100-104. Amanjolov A.S. "Sumer"- Trkic coincidences and graphic logograms. - " Sprache, Geschichte und Kltr der Altaischen Vlker " (Protokollband der XII. Tagung der Permanent International Altaistic Conference 1969 in Berlin), Berlin, 1974, pp. 65 -71. Amanjolov A.S. Materials and research in history of Ancient Trkic writing. Author's abstract of the Ph.D Dissertation, Alma-Ata, 1975. Amanjolov A.S. Problem of the origin of the Trkic runic alphab et. Coll. "Kazak tili men edebiet ["Kazakh language and the literature "], issue 8, Alma -Ata, 1976 (1977), p. 59-71. Amanjolov A.S. Genesis of Trkic runes. "Problems of linguistics", 1978, No2, p. 76 -87. Amanjolov A.S. Kne Trki, Arab, Latyn grafikasy ku rsynyn programmasy [Curriculum for the course in Ancient Trkic, Arabic and Latin graphics]. Almaty, 1980. Amanjolov A.S. Trkic runic graphics (methodical development), I - . Alma -Ata, 1980 (Part I), 1981 (Part II), 1985 (Part III). Amanjolov A.S. Ancient Trkic dialects and Trkic written literary language. "Questions of eastern philology", Alma-Ata, 1985, p. 60-76. Amanjolov A.S. Introduction in Trkic philology (methodical development and program for a course in Kazakh branch of philological faculty). Alma-Ata, 1986. Amanjolov A.S. Question in dialect classification of Ancient Trkic writing monuments. "Problems of linguistics", 1986, No 1, p. 75 -81. Amanjolov A.S. Kola aynadaghy koltangba [Autograph on a Bronze mirror]. "Bilim jene engbek" (Almaty), 1986, No 2, p. 26 - 27. Amanjolov A.S. Ertik jazu eskertkishteri [Irtysh written monuments]. "Bilim jene engbek", 1988, No 11, p. 36. Amanjolov A.S. Traces of a deer cult in Trkic languages. Coll. "Problems of cultural monuments of Kazakhstan study and protection", Alma-Ata, 1990. Amanjolov A.S. Ancient Trkic writing. - Kazakh SSR. The 4-volume brief encyclopedia. Alma-Ata, 1991, p. 220. Amanjolov A.S. Typki filologiyasy jene jazu Tarihi [Trkic philology and history of writing]. Almaty, 1996. Amanjolov A.S. Ancient Trkic writing and monuments of early statehood in the territory of Kazakhstan. "Kazakhstan and the world community " (Almaty), 1996, No 4, p. 13 -15. Amanjolov A.S. Historico-etymological etudes (Turk, Turgesh, Kengeres). "Bulletin KazGU", philological series, No 30, Almaty, 1999, p. 9-13. Amanjolov A.S. Kne trki tili (oku pengining baghdarlamasy) [Ancient Trkic language (Program for a subject carriculum)]. " KazMU habarshy -sy", philologia seriyasy, No 30, Almaty, 1999, p. 13-16. Amirova T. A. Hi story and theory of graphemics. ., 1977. Amirova T.A. Common lingvistic base of graphemics (theoretical problems of graphemics and hypotheses of functional interrelation of written and sound language). Author's abstract of Ph.D Dissertation, ., 1981. Ami rova T.A. Functional interrelation of written and sound language. ., 1985. Amirova T.A., Amanjolov A.S. History of study of earliest stages of writing. - Coll. Proceedings MGPIIYa, issue 275, "Pressing problems of history and historiography of linguistics ", ., 1986, p. 126 -133. Antonov N.K. Lections on Trkology. Yakutsk, 1976. Antonov N.K. Lections on Trkology (Middle - Trkic epoch). Yakutsk, 1981. Aragachi Z. B. Monument from Elegesta. "Scientific notes of Tuva NIIYALI", issue IX, Kyzyl, 1961, p. 235-237.

Aragachi Z. B. New epigraphic finds in Tuva. "Scientific notes of Tuva NIIYALI", issue X, Kyzyl, 1963, p. 247-256. Aragachi Z. B., Nasilov D. M. Inscription on a rock Khaya -Uju. "Scientific notes of Tuva NIIYALI", issue X, Kyzyl, 1963, p. 257 - 263. Ara nchyn Yu.L. Saygyn slab with Ancient Trkic inscription. "Epygraphics of the East", V, 1951, p. 76 - 77.. Aristov N. Research of ethnic composition of Kirgiz - Kazakhs of the Big Horde and Kara Kirgiz from genealogical legends and existing information, a nd the beginning anthropological research. "Live olde", issue III - IV, SPb., 1894. Aristov N. Notes about ethnic structure of Trkic tribes and nations and their number. "Live olde", issue III - IV, SPb., 1896. Aristov N.A. Usuns and Kyrgyzes or Kara - Kyrgyzes. Sketches of history and life of western Tian-Shan population and research on its historical geography. Bishkek, 2001. Arslanova F. Kh. archeologicalal monuments of the Average Irtysh area. The author's abstract candidate. Dissertation, Alma-Ata, 1964. Arslanova F. Kh., Klyashtorny S.G. Runic inscription on a mirror from the Upper Irtysh area. "Trkological Collection. 1972", ., 1973, p. 306 -315. Artamonov M.I. Inscriptions on flasks in the Novocherkassk museum and on Mayak fortress stones. Coll. "S oviet Archeology", XIX, ., 1954, p. 263 -268. Artamonov M.I. Antropomorphic deities in the religion of Scythians. "Archeological collection", issue 2. Scythian - Sarmatian time. L., 1961. Archeological map of Kazakhstan (register). Compilers: . I.Ageeva, K.A.Akishev, G.A.Kushaev, A.G.Maksimova, T.N.Senigova. Publishing house KazSSR Academy of Sciences, Alma-Ata, 1960. Ahmanova O.S. Dictionary of linguistic terms. ., 1966. Ahmetov M. A. Meaning of word "erinch" in languageof Orhono -Enisey monuments. "Bulletin of KazSSR Academy of Sciences", 1970, No 9 (305).

B
Baichorov S. Inscriptions of the Khumarian fortress. "Soviet Trkology", 1974, No 4, p. 89 93. Baichorov S.Ya. N.Caucasus area of ancient Trkic runic writing. Author's abstract of PhD Dissertation., ., 1977. Baichorov S.Ya. Ancient Trkic runic monuments of Europe. Relation of North Caucasian area ancient Trkic inscriptions to Volga -Don and Danube area inscriptions. Stavropol, 1989. Baichorov S.Ya. Ancient Trkic runic monuments of Europe (Relation of a North Caucasian area ancient Trkic runic inscriptions to Volga -Don and Danube area inscriptions.) Author's abstract of PhD Dissertation, Alma-Ata, 1999. Balakaev M, Janpeyisov E., Tomanov M. Kazak edebi tilinin meseleleri, Almaty, 1961. Baltin P.I. Semantics of Ancient Trkic word sir. Collection of works of Karachaevo Circassian pedagogical institute, issue 3, Nalchik, 1960. Bartold V.V. New research of Orkhon inscriptions. "Journal of the National Education Ministry" (SPb.), 1902, p. 231 - 325. Bartold V.V. Greco-Baktrian state and its spread in the northeast. "News of Academy of Sciences" (Petrograd), VI series, 1916, No 10. Bartold V.V. Question of Sogdian and Tochar languages. "Iran", vol. I, L., 1927, p. 29 -41. Bartold V.V. History of the Trkic -Mongolian peoples. Tashkent, 1928. Baruzdin Yu. D. Finds in the south of Kirgizia. Coll. "New epigraphic finds in Kirgizia" (1961)", Frunze, 1962, p. 11 - 13. Baskakov N.A., Nasilov V.M. Uigur- Russian dictionary, ., 1939. Baskakov N.A., Toshchakova T.M. Oijrot - Russian dictionary. ., 1947. Baskakov N.A. Karakalpak language, II. Phonetics an d morphology, Part I, M., 1952.

Baskakov N. A. Classification of Trkic languages. "News of USSR Academy of Sciences", OLYA, 1952, No 2. Baskakov N.A. Classification of Trkic languages in connection with a historical periodization of their development and formation. - Works of Institute of Linguistics USSR Academy of Sciences, 1952, vol. I. Baskakov N.A., Inkijekova-Grekul. Khakass-Russian dictionary. ., 1953. Baskakov N.A. Structure of syllable in Trkic languages. Coll. "Research of comparative grammar of Trkic languages, I, Phonetics". ., 1955, p. 333 -334. Baskakov N. A. Project for uni form phonetic transcription of Trkic languages. ., 1959. Baskakov N.A. Trkic languages. ., 1961. Baskakov N.A. Introduction in study of Trkic languages. 2nd print, ., 1966. Baskakov N.A. Three runic inscriptions from village Mendur -Sokkon the Mountain Altai autonomous region. "Soviet Ethnography", 1966, No 6, p. 79 -83. Baskakov N.A. Northern dialects of Altai (Oirot) language. Dialect of Kara Tatars (Tba Kiji). Grammatic sketch and dictionary. ., 1966. Baskakov N.A. Trkic languages (common data and typological characteristics). "Languages of peoples of USSR", vol. II, "Trkic languages", ., 1966, p. 7 -42. Baskakov N. A. Modern condition and the further improvement of Trkic language alphabets for peoples of USSR. Coll. "Questions of improvement o f Trkic languages of USSR", ., 1972. Baskakov N.A. Developmental experience in Latinized alphabets for Trkic languages of peoples of USSR. Coll. "Questions of improvement of Trkic languages of USSR", ., 1972. Baskakov N.A. Unification of terms for anc ient and medieval written Trkic languages. "Trkological Collection - 1977", ., 1981. Baskakov N.A. Altai family of languages and its study. ., 1981. Batmanov I.A. Language of the Yenisei monuments of Ancient Trkic writing. Frunze, 1959. Batmanov I.A. New texts. Coll. "New epigraphic finds in Kirgizia (1961)", Frunze, 1962. Batmanov I.A., Aragachi Z. B., Babushkin G.F. Modern and ancient Enisey. Frunze, 1962. Batmanov I.A. Once more about inscription on a rock Khaya -Uju. "Works of Kyzyl Teacher College", III, 1963, p. 239 - 242. Batmanov I.A. Dating Yenisei monuments of Ancient Trkic writing. "Scientific notes of Tuva NIIYALI", issue X, Kyzyl, 1963, p. 291-302. Batmanov I.A., Kunaa A. Ch. Monuments of Ancient Trkic writing of Tuva, issue I, Kyzyl, 1963. Batmanov I.A., Kunaa A. Ch. Monuments of Ancient Trkic writing of Tuva, issue II, Kyzyl, 1963. Batmanov I.A., Kunaa A. Ch. Monument from Iyme. Coll. "Materials on general Trkology and Dunganology", Frunze, 1964, p. 92-94. Batmanov I.A. Trkological not es (for further searches). Coll. "Materials on general Trkology and Dunganology", Frunze, 1964, p. 3 -11. Batmanov I.A. Traces of dialects in language of Orkhon -YEnisey writing monuments. Coll. "Problems Trkology and histories of oriental studies", Kazan, 1964. Batmanov I.A., Kunaa A. Ch. Monuments of Ancient Trkic writing of Tuva, issue III, Kyzyl, 1965. Batmanov I.A. Sources of formation of Trkic languages of Southern Siberia and Central Asia. Coll. "Sources of formation of Trkic languages of Central Asia and Southern Siberia", Frunze, 1966, p. 5 - 22. Batmanov I.A. Talas monuments of Ancient Trkic writing. Frunze, 1971. Batmanov I.A. Ancient's Trkic dialects and their reflection in the modern languages. Coll. "Ancient Trkic dialects and their refle ction in the modern languages", Frunze, 1971, p. 3 26. Bauer G. M. Language of S.Aravian writing. ., 1966. Begaliev G.B., Gavrilov M.F. Kazakh-Russian dictionary. Alma-Ata, 1936.

Bernshtam A. N. Origin of the Trks. "Problems of history of pre -capitalistic societies", 1935, No 5 - 6. Bernshtam A. N. Most ancient traces of "Dj'- ing" in Trkic languages of Central Asia. Coll. "In memory of academician N.Ya.Marr (1864 -1934)", M.-L., 1938. Bernshtam A. N. Tjurgesh coins. "Works of Oriental Department of Stat e Hermitage", vol. II, 1940, p. 105-111. Bernshtam A. N. Social and economic system of Orhono - Enisey Trks in the 6th - 8th centuries. M.-L., 1946. Bernshtam A. N. Most ancient Trkic elements in ethnogenesis of Central Asia. "Soviet Ethnography", vol. VI - VII, M.-L., 1947, p. 148-158. Bernshtam A. N. New works on Tochar problem. "Bulletin of ancient history", 1947, No 2, p. 134-138. Bernshtam A. N. Question of Usuns // Kushan and Tochars. (From Histories of the Central Asia). "Soviet Ethnography", 1947, No 3, p. 41-47. Bernshtam A. N. Ancient Trkic inscriptions on r. Lena. "Epygraphics of the East", IV, M. -L., 1951, p. 76-86. Bernshtam A. N. Ancient Trkic document from Sogd (Preliminary posting), "Epygraphics of the East", V, 1951, p. 65 - 75. Bernshtam A. N. Petroglyphs from Saymaly Tash. "Soviet Ethnography", 1952, No 2. Bernshtam A. N. Ancient Trkic runic inscriptions from Fergana. "Epygraphics of the East", XI, 1956, p. 55-58. Bernshtam A. N. New Ancient Trkic and Chinese epigraphic finds. "Epygraph ics of the East", XII, 1958, p. 67-68. Biishev A.G. "Primary" long vowels in Trkic languages. Ufa 1968. Bichurin N.Ya. (Iakinf). Collection of data about peoples in Central Asia during ancient times, vol. I - III, M.-L., 1950-1953 (1st ed., SPb., 1851). B lagova G.F. Problems of studying medieval Trkic texts. "Trkological Collection - 1977", ., 1981. Bogoroditsky V.A. Introduction into Tatar linguistics in connection with other Trkic languages. 2nd edition (revised and appended), Kazan, 1953. Borovkov A.K. "Bada'i al-lugat". Dictionary of Tali ' Imani Geratian to Alisher Navoi's compositions. ., 1961. Borovkov A.K. Lexicon of Central Asian tefsir of the 12th - 13th centuries, ., 1963. Borovkov A.K. Enisey inscriptions on vessels. Coll. "Trkological rese arch", M.-L., 1963, p. 190-196. Budagov L. Z. Comparative dictionary of Turkish -Tatar adverbs, vol. I - II, SPb., 18691871. Butanaev V.Ya. New Uibat sabra. "Scientific notes of Khakass NIIYALI", issue XVIII, philological series, No 2, Abakan, 1973 (runic inscription on a stele, examined by us in 1972 and insufficiently precisely reproduced byV.Ya. Butanaev). Bykov A.A. Coins of China. L., 1969. Weinstein S.I. Kurgans and stele with Ancient Trkic runic inscription in the Herbis -Baary valley. "Scientific notes of Tuva NIIYALI", issue X, Kyzyl, 1963, p. 264 -267.

V
Valihanov Ch. Ch. Compositions. "Notes of IRGO of Ethnography Branch", vol. XXIX, SPb., 1904. Valihanov Ch. Ch. Collection of works in five volumes, vol. 1, Alma -Ata, 1961. Vandries J. Language. A linguistic introduction into history. ., 1937. Vasilevich G.M. Evenk- Russian dictionary. ., 1958. Vasilevich G.M. Evenks' early beliefs about the world (Materials). Coll. "Research and materials about primitive religious beliefs", ., 1959. Vasiliev V.P. Chinese inscription on Orkhon monuments in Kosho -Tsaydam and Karabalgasun. - Collection of works of Orkhon expedition,

III. SPb., 1897, p. 1-36. Vasiliev D.D., Klyashtorny S.G. Runic inscription Yir - Sayir. "Soviet Trkology", 1973, No 2, p. 105 - 110. Vasiliev D. D. Graphic features of Hoyto-Tamir monuments. Coll. "Questions of eastern literary critici sm and textology", ., 1976, p. 100 -109. Vasiliev D. D. Monuments of Trkic runic writing of the Asian area. "Soviet Trkology", 1976, No 1, p. 71-81. Vasiliev D. D. Monuments of Trkic runic writing of the Asian area, II. "Soviet Trkology", 1978, No 5, p. 92 - 95. Vasiliev D. D. Ancient Trkic epygraphy of Southern Siberia. "Trkological Collection. 1975", ., 1978, p. 92 - 101. Vasiliev D. D. Trkic runes on metal mirrors from Minusinsk collection. "Written monuments and problems of history of culture of peoples of the East", issue 14, ch. 1, ., 1979, p. 27 33. Vasiliev D. D. New Ancient Trkic inscription from Tuva. "Archeological discoveries - 1979", ., 1980, p. 193. Vasiliev D. D. Ancient Trkic epygraphics of Southern Siberia. II. "Trkological Co llection. 1977", ., 1981, p. 51 - 62. Vasiliev D.D., Chadamba Z. B. Ancient Trkic epigraphic monuments from r. Uk valley. "Trkological Collection. 1977", ., 1981, p. 63 -75. Vasiliev D.D., Nasilov D. M. Reading of Abakan monument. Coll. "Medieval East: history, culture, source study". ., 1980, p. 60 -66. Vasiliev D. D. Inventory of graphic monuments of Trkic runic writing in the Asia area. (Attempt of systematizing). ., 1983. Vasiliev D. D. Codex of Trkic runic monuments in the basin of Yenisei. L., 1983. Veselovsky N.I. Greek images on Turkestan ossuaries. "News of the archeologicalal commission", issue 63, Petrograd, 1917. Wideman F. Beginning of historical Greek script. Research attempt in the field of most ancient Greek alphabet. Leipzig, 1908 (1910). Vinnik D.F., Kojemjako P. N. Monuments of Ancient Trkic writing from Ayrtam -Oy valley. Coll. "New epigraphic finds in Kirgizia (1961)", Frunze, 1962, p. 3 -10. Methodical questions in study of history of Trkic languages. A stenography of coordination meeting about methodical questions in study of history of Trkic languages, Ashkhabad 19 - 22 October, 1959. Ashkhabad, 1961. Questions of development of literary languages of peoples of USSR (Materials of All -Union conference, 20 - on November, 24, 1962). Alma-Ata, 1964. Questions of perfection the alphabets of USSR's Trkic languages. ., 1972. Vostokov A. Similarity of the signs found in Siberia to those found in Germany. "Siberian bulletin", SPb., 1824, ch. I, p. 1 - 8 (translation and the comment of the review by G.Rommel from " Gottingische gelehrte Anzeigen", No204, 1823. Vyatkina K.V. Kentey runic inscription. Coll. "Philology and a history of Mongolian peoples", ., 1958, p. 217 - 218.

G
Gadjieva N. Z. Voiceless beginning of word in pra- Trkic language. "Soviet Tr kology", 1973, No 4, p. 3 - 10. Gadjieva N. Z., Serebrennikov B.A. Was initial J in Trkic languages a primary initial? "Soviet Trkology", 1974, No 3, p. 75 - 82. Garipov T.M. Kypchak languages of the Uralo-Volga region. Attempt of synchronic and diachron ic characteristics. ., 1979. Gaffarov M.A. Complete Perso-Russian dictionary, vol. I - II, ., 1914. Ginzburg V.V. Anthropological characteristic of Kazakhstan population during Bronze Epoch. "Works of of History, Archeology and Ethnography Institute ofs KazSSR Academy of Science", vol. I, Archeology, Alma-Ata, 1956, p. 159, 170 - 171.

Ginzburg V.V. Anthropological materials of Southeast Kazakhstan ancient population. "Works of of History, Archeology and Ethnography Institute ofs KazSSR Academy of Science", vol. 7, Archeology, Alma-Ata, 1959. Grach A.D. Petroglyphs of Tuva, I. Collection of the Museum of anthro pology and ethnography, issue XVII, M.-L., 1957, p. 385-428, tabl. I- . Grach A.D. Petroglyphs of Tuva, II. Collection of the Museum of anthropology and ethnography, issue XVIII, M.-L., 1958, p. 339-384, tabl. I-LXIV. Grach A.D. Ancient Trkic sculptures of Tuva. ., 1961. Grach A.D. Chronological and ethno- cultural borders of Ancient Trkic time. "Trkological Collection", ., 1966. Grach A.D. Problems of dating and semantics for Ancient Trkic tamga -shaped images of mountain goat. "Trkological Collection. 1972", ., 1973, p. 316 -333. Grigoriev G.V. Brief report about works of 1937 Yangil archeologicalal expedition. Tashkent, 1940. Grigoriev G.V. Keles steppe in relation to archeology (Culture history of ancient Sakas). "News of KazSSR Academy of Sciences", archeologicalal series, issue I, Alma-Ata, 1948, p. 47 - 78. Grozny B. Pre-historic events in Near East. "Bulletin of ancient history", 1940. No 3 - 4, (12 - 13). Gryaznov M.P. Connections of Southern Siberia nomads with Central Asia and Near East in the1st millennium BC "Materials of the Second meeting of archeologists and ethnographers of Central Asia", M.-L., 1959. Gryaznov M.P., Klyashtorny S.G. Inscription or a deer? (In reference to one publication). "Peoples of Asia and Africa", 1966, No 2, p. 131 - 133. Gumilev L. N. Hunnu. Middle Asia during ancient times. ., 1960. Gumilev L. N. In reference to interpretation of Ulankom inscription. "Soviet Archeology", 1963, No 1, p. 295 - 298. Gumilev L. N. Ancient Trks. ., 1967.

D
Dalsky A. N. Petroglyphs of Tadjikistan. "News of All-Union Geographical society", 1949, vol. 81, issue 2, p. 183 - 197. Dvoretskiy I. Kh. Ancient Greek-Russian dictionary, vol. I - II, ., 1958. Derfer G. Status of Khalage group of languages research. "Problems of linguistics" , 1972, M 1. Djumagulov Ch.Second Talas monument. Coll. "New epigraphic finds in Kirgizia (1961)", Frunze, 1962. Djumagulov Ch. Epigraphy of Kirgizia. Issue 1 -3, Frunze, 1963, 1982, 1989. Djumagulov Ch., Karagulova G. New Talas Ancient Trkic monument. "Ne ws of KirSSR Academy of Sciences", 1978, No 1, p. 86-88. Diringer D. Alphabet, ., 1963 (translation of English edition of 1949). Dmitriev N.K. Works of Russian scientists in Trkology area. "Scientific notes of Moscow State University", 1946, vol. III, Book. 2, issue 107, p. 63 - 70. Dmitriev N.K. Correlation o f r/d/t/z/z/y. Coll. "Research in comparative grammar of Trkic languages, Part I, Phonetics", ., 1955, p. 326 - 328. Dmitriev N.K. Phonetic law of the beginning and end in Trkic words. Coll. "Research in comparative grammar of Trkic languages, Part I. Phonetics", ., 1955, p. 265 - 273. Dmitriev N.K. Structure of Trkic languages. ., 1962. Dmitrieva L.V. Khuastuanift (introduction, text, translation). "Trkological research", . -L., 1963. Dobrodomov I.G. Secondary runic inscriptions on coins and questi ons of monetary circulation among ancient Yenisei Trks. - Near and Middle East. Commodity-monetary relations during feudalism. ., 1980, p. 94 -97. Dravert P. L. A grotto with inscription on lake Djasybay in vicinity of the Bayan -aul. "News of the Western Siberian Geographical society", vol. VII, Omsk, 1930, p. 231 -234.

Ancient Trkic civilization: writing monuments. (Materials of the international scientific theoretical conference devoted to 10 -year independence of Republic Kazakhstan, Astana, 18 - 19 May, 2001). Almaty, 2001. Ancient Trkic dictionary. Editors: V.M.Nadelyaev, D.M.Nasilov, E.R.Tenishev, A.M.Scherbak. L., 1969. Dulzon A.P. Terms of relationship and properties in languages of Narym territory and Chulym area. "Scientific notes of Tomsk pedagog ical institute", vol. XI, Tomsk, 1954. Dulzon A. P. Methods of detecting remote language relationships. Coll. "Origin of Siberia natives and their languages" (Materials of inter -university conference 11 - 13 May, 1969), Tomsk, 1969, p. 5 - 8. Dulzon A.P. Hypothesis of remote relationship of Uralo-Altaic languages with IndoEuropean. Coll. "Origin of Siberia natives and their languages". Tomsk, 1969, p. 108 - 110. Dulzon A. P. Some questions on reconstruction technique of common Trkic sound system. "Soviet Trkology", 1971, No 2, p. 17 - 20. Dulzon A.P. Detecting phoneme archetype by inter -language line of alternations. "Soviet Trkology", 1973, No 5, p. 93 - 104. Diaconov I.M. Languages of ancient Near East. ., 1967.

E
Evthova L., Kiselyov S. Chaa -tas near village Kopeny. "Works of State Historical Museum", issue XI, ., 1940, p. 21 -54. Evthova L.A., Kiselyov S.V. Report about works of the 1935 Sayan -Altai expedition. "Works of State Historical Museum", issue XVI, ., 1941. Evthova L., Kiselyov S. V. Te nth excavating season of Sayan-Altai expedition IIMK and GIM. "Brief notes of History of material culture Institute", III, 1940, p. 39 - 42. Evthova L.A. Archeological monuments of Yenisei Kyrgyzes (Khakases). Abakan, 1948. Evthova L., Kiselyov S. V. Say an-Altai expedition. "Brief notes of History of material culture Institute", XXVI, 1949, p. 120-127. Egorov V.G. Chavashla-Vyrasla dictionary (Chuvash-Russian dictionary). Cheboksary, 1954. Jamanbaev K. lke tanudaghy kadamdarymyz. "Qazaqstan mgalimi" (Al ma-Ata), July, 1, 1965.

Z
Zadneprovsky .A. Trkic monuments in Fergana. "Soviet Archeology", 1967, No 1. Developmental laws of literary languages of USSR peoples during Soviet epoch. (Intrastructural development of old written languages). ., 1973. Zolotaryov A. Traces of totemism among peoples of Siberia. L., 1934. Zuev . A. Question about language of ancient Usuns. "Bulletin of KazSSR Academy of Sciences", 1957, No 5 (146). Zuev . A. Chinese news about Suyab. "News of KazSSR Academy of Sciences", seri es of a history, archeology and ethnography, issue 3 (14), Alma -Ata, I960. Zuev .A. "Horse tamgas from vassal princedoms". (Translation of Chinese composition of the 8th - 10th centuries "Tanhuyao", vol. III, tszan 72, p. 1305 -1308). Coll. "New materials on ancient and medieval history of Kazakhstan", Alma -Ata, 1960. Zuev .A. Ancient Trkic genealogical legends as a source on early history of Trks. Author's abstract of PhD dissertation. Alma-Ata, 1967.

I
Ivanov V.V. Hett language, ., 1963. Illich-Svi tych V.M. Altaic dentals: t, d, . "Problems of linguistics", 1963, No 6, p. 37 - 56. Illich- Svitych V.M. Altaicie guttural: *k', *k, *g. Coll. "Ethymology. 1964", ., 1965, p. 338-343.

Illich-Svitych V.M. Correlation of slotted in nostratiche languages. C oll. "Ethymology. 1966", ., 1968, p. 304 - 355. Illich-Svitych V.M. Attempt of comparison Nostratic languages (Semitochamitian, Kartvel, Indo- European, Uralic, Dravidian, Altaic). ., 1971. Inostrantsev K. Hunnus and Huns. L., 1926. Ismagulov O. Anthropological characteristic of Jeti-Su Usuns. "Works of C.C.Valihanov History, Archeology and Ethnography Institute", vol. 16, Alma -Ata, 1962. Ismagulov O. Population of Kazakhstan from Bronze Epoch to modernity (paleoantropological research). Alma-Ata, 1970. Re search on comparative grammar of Trkic languages, I -IV, ., 1955, 1956, 1961, 1962.. Historical development of Trkic languages' lexicon. ., 1961. History of Kazakh SSR, vol. I. Alma-Ata, 1957. Istrin V.A. Emergence and development of writing. ., 1965 ( 2nd revised edition). Iskhakov F., Kh. Some suggestions about the origin of final -t and - d in words ast, st, ald, art, etc. "To Academician V.A.Gordlevsky to his seventy years", (Collection of articles), ., 1953, p. 124-136, Iskhakov F.G., Palmbah A.A. Grammar of the Tuva language. Phonetics and morphology, ., 1961. Its R. A flower of lotus. Stories of the ethnographer. Geografgiz, ., 1962.

K
Qazaq tilinin tsindirrme szdigi, I -II. Almaty, 1959-1961. Qazaq tilinin tsindirrme szdigi, I -X, Almaty, 1974-1986. Kallaur V.A. Rock with Ancient Trkic inscription from Aulieatin district. "Notes of Eastern Branch of Russian archeological society" [ZVO RAO], vol. XI, SPb., 1899. Kastanie I.A. Excavation report, 6 kurgans in Aktyubinsk district in the summer o f 1906 Works of Orenburg scientific archival commission, 1908, issue 19, p. 102 -116. Kastanie I.A. Antiques of Kirgiz steppe and Orenburg territory. - Works of Orenburg scientific archival commission, issue 22. Orenburg, 1910. Kiselyov S. V. Unpublished inscriptions of Yenisei Kirgiz. "Bulletin of ancient history", No 3 (8), 1939, p. 124-134. Kiselyov S.V. Ancient history of Southern Siberia. M. -L., 1949, (2 edition - ., 1951). Kiselyov S.V. Script of the Yenisei Kyrgyzes. "Brief messages IIMK", issue XX V, M.-L., 1949, p. 33-41. Kiselyov S.V. Brief sketch of ancient history of Khakases. Abakan, 1951. Klyashtorny S.G. Kangy ethno -toponymics in Orkhon Texts. "Soviet Ethnography", 1951, No 3. Klyashtorny S.G. Ancient Trkic runic monuments as a source on hi story of Central Asia, ., 1964. Klyashtorny S.G., Tonjukuk - Ashide anchjen. "Trkological Collection", ., 1966, p. 202 205. Klyashtorny S.G., Livshits V.A. Sevrey stone. "Soviet Trkology", 1971, No 3, p. 106 -112. Klyashtorny S.G., Livshits V.A. Sogdian inscription from Buguta. - Coll. "Countries and peoples of the East", X, ., 1971, p. 121 -146. Klyashtorny S.G., Sambu I.U. New runic inscription in Ulug -Hem area. "Scientific notes of Tuva NIIYALI", issue XV, Kyzyl, 1971, p. 245 -249. Klyashtorny S.G. Runic inscription of Sayan canyon of Yenisei. "Scientific notes of Tuva NIIYALI", issue XVI, Kyzyl, 1973, p. 228 -231. Klyashtorny S.G. Ancient Trkic writing and culture of peoples of the Central Asia (on materials of field research in Mongolia, 1968 -1969). "Trkological Collection. 1972", ., 1973, p. 254-264. Klyashtorny S.G. Coin with runic inscription from Mongolia. "Trkological Collection, 1972", ., 1973, p. 334 -338.

Klyashtorny S.G. Stelae of Gold lake (To the dating of the Yenisei runic monuments). Trkologica. To the 70eth anniversary of Acad. A.N.Kononov. L., 1976. Klyashtorny S.G. Temple, sculpture and stele in the Ancient Trkic texts (Interpretation of Ikhe-Hanyn-nor inscription). "Trkological Collection. 1974", ., 1978, p. 238 -255. Klyashtor ny S.G. Rock runic inscriptions of Mongolia. "Trkological Collection - 1975", ., 1978, p. 151-158. Klyashtorny S.G. Ancient Trkic inscription on stone sculpture from Choyren. - Countries and peoples of the East, issue 22. M., 1980, p. 90 -102. Klyashtorn y S.G. Terkhin inscription. "Soviet Trkology", 1980, No 3, p. 82 -95. Klyashtorny S.G. Mythological plots in Ancient Trkic monuments. "Trkological Collection. 1977", ., 1981, p. 117 -138. Klyashtorny S.G. Dating of Talas runic monuments. - Bartold's readings. 1980. Fifth year. Theses of reports and briefs. ., 1981. Klyashtorny S.G. Tesin stele (preliminary publication). "Soviet Trkology", 1983, No 6, p. 80-88. Klyashtorny S.G. Inscription of Uigur Bg -Kagan in Northwest Mongolia, - Central Asia. New mo numents of writing and art. ., 1987, p. 19 -37. Klyashtorny S.G. Runic monuments of Talas: problems of dating and topography. - Study of cultural heritage of the East. Cultural traditions and continuity in development of ancient cultures and civilizations. SPb., 1999, p. 30-33. Klyashtorny S.G. New discoveries of Ancient Trkic runic inscriptions in the Central Tian Shan. "News NAN KR" (Bishkek), 2001, No 1 -2, p. 73-75. Klyashtorny S.G. Ancient runic inscriptions in Central Tian -Shan. "News of MON RK, NAN KR", series of social studies, 2001, No 1, p. 83 -87. Klyashtorny S.G. Runic monuments of Talas: problems of dating and topography. "News of MON RK, NAN KR", series of social studies, 2001, No 1, p. 88 -91. Marko Polo Book. Translation of Old French text by I .P.Minaev. Redaction and introductory article by I.P.Magidovich. Geografgiz. ., 1955. Kobeshavidze I. N. Characteristic of the graphics and phonetic structure of Orkhon Yenisean inscriptions' language. "Soviet Trkology" (Baku), 1972, No 2, p. 40 -46. Komarov P. A. Borolday inscriptions. Notes of Turkestani circle of archeology lovers, year X, Tashkent, 1905. Kondratiev V.G. Treatise on grammar of Ancient Trkic language. L., 1970. Kondratiev V.G. To eighth- decade of decoding of Trkic runic writing. "Sovie t Trkology", 1974, No 1, p. 58-62. Kondratiev V.G. Grammatical structure of language of Ancient Trkic writing monuments of the 8th-11th centuries. L., 1981. Kononov A. N. Attempt of analysis of the term Trk. "Soviet Ethnography", 1949, No 1, p. 40-47. Kononov A. N. Grammar of modern Turkish literary language. M. -L., 1956, Kononov A. N. Family tree of Turkmen. Composition of Khiva Khan Abu -l-Gazi. M.-L., 1958. Kononov A. N. Trkic philology in the USSR. 1917 - 1967. ., 1968. Kononov A. N. Trkic linguistic s in Leningrad. 1917- 1967. "Trkological Collection. 1970". ., 1970, p. 5 -28. Kononov A. N. V.V. Radlov and domestic Trkology. "Trkological Collection. 1971", ., 1972, p. 7-15. Kononov A. N. History of study Trkic languages in Russia. Pre -October period. L., 1972, 1982. Kononov A. N. Some results in the development of the Soviet Trkology and objectives of Soviet committee of Trkologists. "Soviet Trkology", 1974, No 2, p. 3 -12. Kononov A. N. Grammar of Trkic runic monuments language of the 7th -9th centuries. L., 1980. Kormushin I.V. Texto logical research of Ancient Trkic runic monuments. 1. "Trkological Collection. 1977", ., 1981, p. 139 -149.

Kormushin I.V. Trkic Yenisei epitaphs. Texts and research. ., 1997. Kormushin I.V., Nasilov D.M. For scientific, deep study of Ancient Trkic mo numents. "Soviet Trkology", 1972, No 5, p. 139 -142. Kosven M.O. Treatise on history of primitive culture. ., 1953. Kotvich V. Study of on Altai languages. IIL, ., 1962 (translation fr. Polish). Kuznetsov V.A. Inscriptioni's smiths of the Khumarian fortr ess. "Soviet Archeology", 1963, No 1, p. 298-305. Kuznetsov L. Inscription on "Tamgaly-Tas" stone in Betpak-Dala desert in Atbasar district of Akmola province. "Notes of Semipalatinsk department of the Russian State Geographical society", issue XVI, Semipalatinsk, 1927, p. 122. Kurbatov Kh. Alphabet unification of Trkic languages. "Soviet oriental studies", 1957, No 6. Kryshjanov E., Tomanov M. Orhon -Enisey jazuy eskertkishterinin zertteu Tarihy men grammatikalyk treateaseteri. Almaty, 1964. Kyzlasov L.R. Tuva in Uigur Kaganate (8th-9th centuries). "Scientific notes of Tuva NIIYALI", issue VIII, Kyzyl, 1960. Kyzlasov L.R. New dating of the Yenisei writing monuments. "Soviet Archeology", 1960, No 3, p. 93-120. Kyzlasov L.R. New monument of the Yenisei writi ng. "Soviet Ethnography", 1965, No 2, p. 104-113. Kyzlasov L. R. Dating of the Yenisei written monuments. "Soviet Archeology", 1965, No 3, p. 38-49. Kyzlasov L. R. History of Tuva in Middle Ages. ., 1969. Kyzlasov I.L. Runic writing of steppe zone of Eurasia. Problems of source study. Author's abstract of PhD dissertation. ., 1990. Kyzlasov I.L. Paleographical study of Asian runic alphabets. "Soviet Archeology" (Moscow), 1991, No 4. Kyzlasov I.L. Runic writing of the Euroasian steppes. ., 1994. Kner N.V. Chinese news about peoples of Southern Siberia, Central Asia and Far East. ., 1961.

L
Lubo-Lesnichenko E.I. Imported mirrors of Minusinsk depression. M, 1975.

M
Magazanik D.A. Turkish- Russian dictionary. 2nd Edition, ., 1945. Madji . E. Rock figures in Mogoltau mountains. "News of Tadjik SSR Academy of Sciences Branch of social studies", 1957, issue 14. Makaev E.A. Language of most ancient runic inscriptions. Linguistic and historical philological analysis. ., 1965. Makarenko H. E. Archeological research of 1907 -1909 "News of the Archeological Commission", issue 43, 1911, p. 21-22. Maksimova A.G. Petroglyphs of Tamgaly gorge. "Bulletin of KazSSR Academy of Sciences", 1958, No 9 (162), p. 108-110, fig. 1-42. Malitsky N. Connection of Trkic tamgas with Orkhon letters. "Reports of Turkestani circle of archeology lovers", year III. Tashkent, 1897 -1898, p. 43-47. Malov . E. Bulgarian gold bowl with a Turkish inscription. "Kazan museum bulletin", 1921, No 1-2. Malov S. Ancient Turkish gravestone with inscriptions in the basin of r. Talas. "News of USSR Academy of Sciences", Humanities Branch, 1929, No 10. Malov S. E. New monuments with Turkish runes. "Language and thinking", VI-VII, M.-L., 1936, p. 251-279. Malov S.E. Talas epigraphic monuments. "Materials Uzkomstarisa", issue 6 -7, M.-L., 1936.

Malov S. E. Monuments of Ancient Trkic writing. M. -L., 1951. Malov S.E. Enisey writing of Trks. M. -L., 1952. Malov S.E. Ancient and new Trkic languages. "News of USSR Academy of Sciences", OLYA, 1952, issue 2. Malov S.E. Language of Yellow Uigurs. Dictionary and grammar. Alma -Ata, 1957. Malov S.E. Monuments of Ancient Trkic writing in Mongolia and Kirgizia. M .-L, 1959. Mannai- Ool . Kh. New materials of Scythian time in Tuva (Materials of archeological research TNIIYALI in 1962-1963). Scientific notes of TNIIYALI", issue IX, Kyzyl, 1964, p. 278-284. Mannai- Ool . Kh. Ancient image of a mountain goat in Tuva. " Soviet Archeology", 1967, No 1, p. 140-146. Mannai- Ool . Kh. Deer Stones of Tuva. "Scientific notes of Tuva NIIYALI", issue XIII, Kyzyl, 1968, p. 138-149. Mannai- Ool . Kh. Tuva during Scythian time (Uk culture), ., 1970. Margulan . Kh. Third season of archeological work in the Central Kazakhstan (Report of 1948 expedition ). "News of KazSSR Academy of Sciences", archeological series , No 108, issue 3, Alma-Ata, 1951. Margulan . Kh. Architecture of the ancient period (in the book "Architecture of Kazakhstan", Alma-Ata, 1959). Margulan . Kh., Akishev K.A., Kadyrbaev M.K., Orazbasv M. M. Ancient culture of Central Kazakhstan. Alma-Ata, 1966. Margulan . Kh. Begazy -Dandybay culture of Central Kazakhstan. Alma-Ata, 1977. Marikovsky P.I. Methods and objects of hunting in petroglyph motives of rock figures of Chulak mountains (Kazakh SSR). "Zoological Journal", 1953, vol. XXXII, issue 6, p. 1064 1073. Marikovsky P.I. Petroglyphs of Kuldzhabasy mountains. Coll. "New materials for archeology and ethnography of Kazakhstan", Works of IIAE KazSSR Academy of Sciences, vol. 12, Alma-Ata, 1961, p. 78-86. Marx ., Engels F. Selected letters. Gospolitizdat, 1947. Maruzo J. Dictionary of linguistic terms. IIL. ., 1960, Maslov .S. Notes for the theory of graphics. - Philologca. Research in language and literature. In memory of Acad. V.M.Jirmunsky. L., 1973, p. 220-226. Masson V.M. Ancient Baktrian coins minted by Geliokl type tetradrahm. "Epygraphics of the East", XI, 1956. Materials for history of Snnu (Huns) (in Chinese sources). Foreword, translation and notes by V.S.Taskin. ., 1968). Mahmud al-Kashgari. Kitab divan lugat at-turk, vol. I-III, published by Kilisli Ahmed Rifat Abdulkerim. Istanbul, 1915-1917 (in Arabic). Mahmud Kashgari. Divan lugat-at-turk (Mahmud Koshgary. Devonu lughotit turk), vol. I III, Translation (in Uzbek language) and preparation for printing by S.M.Mutallibov, Tashkent, 1960, 1961, 1963. Mahmudov Kh., Musabaev G. Kazakh-Russian dictionary, Alma-Ata, 1954, Mahmutov A. How has arisen Ancient Trkic alphabet? Coll. "Research in Trkology", Alma Ata, 1969, p. 141-147, Medoev A.G. Petroglyphs of Tesiktas and Karaungur mountains. Coll. "New materials on archeology and ethnographies of Kazakhstan", Works of AIAE KazSSR Academy of Sciences, vol. 12, Alma-Ata, 1961, p. 72-77. Melioransky P.M. Monument in honor of Kl -Tegin. ZVO Russian Archeological Society, vol. XII, issue II and III, SPb., 1899, p. 1-144. Melioransky P.M. Two silver vessels with Yenisei inscriptions. ZVO Russian Archeological Society, 1902, vol. XIV, p. 017-022. Melioransky P.M. Ob, Orkhon, and Yenisei gravestone monument s with inscriptions. "Journal of the Ministry of National Education" (SPB.), 1898, Part CCCXVII, June, Div. 2, p. 263-292.

Melioransky P.M. Small Orkhon inscription on silver cup in Rumyantsev museum. ZVO Russian Archeological Society, 1904, vol. XV, p. 034-036. Mepshiev M.S. Excavations of fortress Ak -tobe I citadel. "Bulletin of KazSSR Academy of Sciences", 1964, No 12 (237). Meshchaninov I.I. Mysterious signs on Black Sea Coast. "News of State Academy of history of material culture", issue 62, L., 1933. Mongayt A. L. Archeological cultures and ethnic community (questions of historical archeological research technique). "Peoples of Asia and Africa", 1967, No 1, p. 53 -76. Mongol- Russian dictionary under A.Luvsandendeva's general redaction. ., 1957. Musabaev G.G., Aydars G. Syr-Daria inscription. "Bulletin of KazSSR Academy of Sciences", 1966, No 6 (254), p. 85-86. Musabaev G.G. Kegen inscription. "Bulletin of KazSSR Academy of Sciences", 1967, No 3 (263), p. 83-85. Msabaev Gh., Mahmutov ., Aydarov Gh. Kaz akstan epigrafikasy, I shyghuy. Almaty, 1971.

N
Nadelyaev V.M. Reading of Orkhon- Yenisean sign and ethymology of Tonkuk name. Coll. "Trkological research", M. -L., 1963. Nadjip E. N. Uigur- Russian dictionary. ., 1969. Nadjip E. N. Kypchak-Oguz literary language of Mamlk Egypt of 14th century, ., 1965. Nasilov V.M. Language of Orkhon-Yenisean monuments. ., 1960. Nasilov V.M. Ancient Uigur language. . 1963. Nasilov V.M. Onomastics of Tuvinians, Uigurs and Kazakhs hunting life. "Soviet Trkology", 1970, No 3, p. 71-78. Nasilov V.M. Language of Trkic monuments in Uigur script of the 11th -15th centuries M., I974. Nasilov D. M. Question about modal words rinch, rki and rkn in Ancient Trkic languages. "Works of Samarkand State University. New series, i ssue 102, Samarkand, I960, p. 129-130. Nasilov D. M. Some monuments in Minusinsk museum "Peoples of Asia and Africa" 1963, No 6, p. 124-129. Nasilov D.M. Remark about reading of Yenisei monuments. "Written monuments of the East", Historico-philological research, Year-book 1971. ., 1974, p. 204 -214. Nasilov D.M. Monuments of Ancient Trkic writing (Orkhon -Yenisean and ancient Uigur) in domestic Trkological research of last years (review of linguistic publications in 1969 1974). "Soviet Trkology", 1976, No 1, p. 87-89. Nasilov D.M. Altai linguistic community (History of the problem). "Trkological Collection 1974", ., 1977, p. 90 -108. Nasilov D.M. History of Altaistics. "Soviet Trkology", 1979, No 4. Nasilov D.M. Altaistics of 19th century "Trkological Collection - 1977", ., 1981, p. 150 155. Nekldov S. . Mythology of Trkic and Mongolian peoples (Problem of interrelations). "Trkological Collection - 1977", ., 1981, p. 183 -202. Nasyrov S. D., Ubaydullaev K.U., et al. Karakalpak -Russian dictionary. Redacted by N.A.Baskakov. ., 1958. Nikolsky H. M. Culture of ancient Babylonia. Minsk, 1959. New epigraphic finds in Kirgizia (1961). Coll. of Articles, Frunze, 1962. Nominhanov Ts. D. Alternation of some consonants in Trko -Mongolian languages. "Scientific notes of the Kazakh university", vol. XIX, 1955. Nominhanov Ts. D. Research in Trkic and Mongolian languages. Alma -Ata, 1966.

O
Okladnikov A. P. History of Yakut SSR, vol. I, M.-L., 1955.

Okladnikov A. P. Deer Gold Horns. L.- ., 1964. Oralbaeva N. Kazak grafikasy men orfografijasynyng negizderi. Almaty, 1968. Oransky I.M. Introduction into Iranian philology. ., 1960. Oransky I.M. Iranian languages. ., 1963. Orphography of Trkic literary languages of USSR. M, 1972. Orkhon inscriptions. Kl -Tegin. Bilge-Kagan. Tonyukuk. Compiler and scientific editor A.Amanjolov. Semipalatinsk (Semey), 2001. Sketches of USSR history. A primitive-communal system and most ancient states in the territory of USSR. Redacted by P.N.Tretiyakov and A.L.Mongayt. Edition of USSR Academy of Sciences, ., 1956. In memory of V.Tomsen. For anniversary of his death. L., 1928.

P
Pantusov N. N. Air-kezen and Taygak (Kopal district). "Sessions reports and messages of Turkestani circle of archeology lovers members", year 4 (December, 11, 1898 - December, 11, 1899). Tashkent, 1899, p. 59-63. Pekarsky E.K. Dictionary of Yakut language. ., 1959 (photomechanically reprinted from 1 st edition). Petrov K.I. Genetical relationship of Altai and Indo -European languages. Coll. "Origin of natives of Siberia and their languages", Tomsk, 1969, p. 110 -112. Pigulev N. Syrian sources for history of USSR peoples. (Works of IV of USSR Academy of Sciences, vol. XLI), M.-L., 1941. Pigulev N. Byzantium on the way to India. From the history of Byzantium trade with the East in the 4th-6th centuries. M.-L., 1951. Pigulev N.V. Production of silk in Byzantium and Iran in the 4th century. "Byzantian time", X, 1956. Polivanov E. D. Ideographic motive in the formation of Orkhon alphabet. Print from "Bulletin of SAGU", No 9, Tashkent, 1925. Polivanov E. D. Project of Latinization of Turkish scripts. Tashkent, 1926. Polivanov E.D. "Tu- ke" of Chinese transcription, Turkish "tyrklaer", "News of USSR Academy of Sciences", 1927, No 7-8, p. 691-698. Polivanov E. D. Introduction in linguistics for Eastern Science universities. L., 1928. Poltoratskaya V. N. Signs on subjects from kurgans of of early nomads epoch in Mountain Altai. "Archeological Collection", issue 5. Monuments of Bronze and Early Iron epochs in Eastern Europe, Southern Siberia and Central Asia. L., 1962. Pokrovskaya L.A. Grammar of Gagauz language. Phonetics and morphology. ., 1964. Popov N. Runic letters in Minusinsk territory. "News of the Siberian department of Russian Geographical society", vol. V. No 2, Irkutsk, 1874, p. 53-55. Potanin G.N. Treatise about Northwestern Mongolia, issue IV, SPb., 1883. Potanin G.N. Kazak-Kirgiz and Altai tales, legends and fairy tales. "Alive olden time", vol. XXV, issue II-III (1916.) Petrograd, 1917. Potapov L.P. Traces of totemic ideas among Altaians. "Soviet Ethnography", No 4 -5, 1935. Potapov L.P. Cult of mountains in Altai. "Soviet Ethnography", 1946, No 2. Potapov L.P. Resurrection ritual of shaman tambourine among Trkic -speaking tribes of Altai. "Works of Mikluho-Maklay Institute of ethnography", New series, vol. I, M. -L., 1947, p. 157-182. Potapov L.P. Treatise about history of Altaians. M. -L., 1953. Potapov L.P. Tlbers of Yenisei runic inscriptions. "Trkological Collection - 1971". ., 1972, p. 145-166. Potapov L.P. Umai - deity of ancient Trks in view of ethnographical data. "Trkological Collection - 1972", ., 1973, p. 265 -286. Potapov L.P. Ancient Trkic reverence rituals of the Sky (Tengri) among Sayan -Altai peoples. - Ethnography of Altai and Western Siberia peoples. Novosibirsk, 1978, p. 50-64.

Poyjarkov F. Archeological excursions in Pishpek district and banks of Issyk Kul. "Notebook and address-calendar of Semirech (Jeti-Su) area for 1898", vol. II, Verniy, 1898. Problems of modern Trkology. Materials of 2n d All-Union Trkological conference. Alma Ata, 1980. Problems of unity of the Altai languages. L., 1971. Pubaev R. E. Problems of scientific atheistic propagandizing in overcoming vestiges of Lamaism and a shamanism. Coll. "Criticism of ideology of a Lamai sm and shamanism". Ulan-Ude, 1965.

R
Radjabov A.A. Ongin monument. "Soviet Trkology", 1970, No 2, p. 33 -43. Radlov V.V. Atlas of antiquities in Mongolia. Works of Orkhon expedition, I -IV. SPb., 1892, 1893, 1896, 1899. Radlov V. V. Question about Uigurs. Appendix to LXXII volume of " Notes of the Academy of sciences", No 2, SPb., 1893. Radlov V.V. Attempt of dictionary of Trkic adverbs, vol. I -IV. SPb., 1893-1911. Radlov V.V., Melioransky P.M. Ancient Trkic monuments in Kosho -Tsaydam. - Collection of works of Orkhon expedition, IV. SPb., 1897. Ramstedt G.I. Introduction into Altai linguistics. Morphology. ., 1957 (translation from German). Rashid-ad-Din. Collection of annals, vol. I, Book. 1, 2. M.-L., 1952. Roerich . N. Tocharian problem. "Peoples of A sia and Africa", 1963, No 6, p. 118-123. Rinchine A.R. Brief Mongol- Russian dictionary. ., 1947. Romanova A.V., Myreeva A.N. Dialectological dictionary of Evenki language. L., 1968. Rona-Tash A. Common inheritance or loan? (Problem of relationship of Alta i languages, "Linguistic Questions", 1974, No 2. Rudenko S.I. Art of Altai and Near East (middle of 1st millennium BC). ., 1961. Russian- Turkmen dictionary. General redaction by N.A.Baskakov and M.Ya.Hamzaev. ., 1956. Rygdylon E.R. Signs on slabs with runic inscriptions. "Epygraphics of the East", IX, 1954, p. 63-72. Rygdylon E.R. New runic inscriptions in Minusinsk territory. "Epygraphics of the East", 1951, p. 87-93. Rygdylon E.R. Pictographs near Matkechik village in Abakan. "News of the All -Union geographical society", 1955, vol. 87, issue 6. Rygdylon E.R. Podkun's runic inscription. "Epygraphics of the East", XI, 1956, p. 59 -62. R yasyanen M. Materials for historical phonetics of Trkic languages. ., 1955 (translation from German).

S
Samoilovich A. N. Materials for the literature index for Enisey -Orkhon writing. "Works of Troitskosavian-Kyahtinian section of the Amur department of Russian geographical society", vol. XV (1912), issue I, SPb., 1914, p. 55 -80. Samoilovich . [N]. Amendments to classification of Turkish languages. Petrograd, 1922. Samoylovich A. N. Vilhelm Tomsen and Trkology. Coll. "In V.Tomsen Memory" (For anniversary of his death). L., 1928. Samoylovich A.N. New Trkic runes from Mongolia (1.) "News of USSR Academy of Sciences", Div. Social studies, 1934, p. 631-634. Samoylovich A.N. New's Trkic runes from Mongolia, II. "News of USSR Academy of Sciences", Div. Social studies, 1935, No 7, p. 657-659. Sat Sh. Ch. Tuvan- Russian dictionary. Redaction by A.A.Palmbah, ., 1955. Sanjeev G. D. Old written Mongolian language. ., 1964. Sevortyan E. V. Contents of the term "Common Trkic". "Soviet Trkology", 1971, No 2, p. 3-12.

Sevortyan E.V. Etymological dic tionary of Trkic languages, [I - IV]. ., 1974 -1989. Seydakmatov K. Ancient Trkic inscriptions in Mountain Altai. Coll. "Materials on the general Trkology and Dungan studies", Frunze, 1964, p. 95 -101. Semenov-Tyan-Shansky. Travel to Tien Shan in 1856-1857. Memoirs, vol. II, Geografgiz, ., 1946. Senigova T. N. Petroglyphs near settlement Aktobe. Coll. "Archeological research in northern slopes of Karatau". Works of IIAE KazSSR Academy of Sciences, Alma -Ata, 1962, p. 87-97. Serebrennikov B. A. Some questions about comparative- historical phonetics of Trkic languages. "Questions of linguistics", I960, No 4. Serebryannikov B.A. What was primary r2 or z? "Soviet Trkology", 1971, No 1, p. 13 -19. Serebrennikov B.A., Gadjiev N. Z. Comparative-historical grammar o f Trkic languages. Baku, 1979 (2 edition - ., 1986). Sludsky S. S. Trkic inscription on stone statue. "Eastern Antiquities", Works of Eastern Commission of the Moscow Archeological society", II, I, No 18, ., 1896, p. 68 -89. Smirnov Ya.I. Eastern silver. SPb., 1909. Smirnova O.I. Sogdian coin from collection of Numismatics Department of State Hermitage. "Epygraphics of the East", IV, M.-L., 1951. Sokolov A. From stone to press. "Culture and writing of the East". II, Baku, 1928. Spassky G.I. Notes about Siberian antiquities. Ancient Siberian tracings. "Siberian bulletin", SPb., 1818, Part I. Spassky G.I. Noteworthy monuments of the Siberian antiquities and similarity of some of them with Great Russian. "Notes of Russian Geographical society", Book. XII, SP b., 1857, p. 113-181. Comparative-historical grammar of Trkic languages. Phonetics. M, 1984. Morphology. M, 1988. Stavisky B. Ya. Central Asia, India, Rome (Question about international connections in Kushan period). "India in antiquity" (Collection of ar ticles), ., 1964, p. 166 -187. Stebleva I.V. Trkic poetry of the 6th - 8th of centuries. ., 1965. Stebleva I.V. Poetics of Ancient Trkic literature and its transformation in Early Classical period. ., 1976. Stebleva I.V. Reconstruction of Ancient Trkic religious-mythological system. "Trkological Collection - 1971", ., 1972, p. 213 -226. Stratanovich G.G. Ancient folk beliefs within Buddhism. Coll. "Criticism of ideology of a Lamaism and shamanism", Ulan-Ude. 1965. Subrakova O.V., Batmanov I.A. Ancient's scripts of Khakassia, issue I, Abakan, 1970. Sunik O.P. Problem of unity of Altai languages. Coll. "Problems of unity of the Altai languages", L., 1971. Sydykov S. Ancient inscription in Kulan -Say gorges and Terek - Say. Coll. "Materials for general Trko logy and Dungan studies", Frunze, 1964, p. 102 -106. Sydykov ., Konkobaev K. Bayiyrky trk jazuusu (7th -10th kylymdar. Okuu kitebi. Bishkek, 2001.

T
Tabaldiev K.S., Soltobaev O.A. Runic inscription in Kochkor valley. Journal "" (Bishkek), 1998, No 2, p. 36-37. Tabaldiev K.S., Soltobaev O.A. Runic inscription in Kochkor valley. "News NAN KR" (Bishkek), 2001, No 1-2. Tenishev E.R. Runic inscription on r. Charysh rock (Altai). "Epygraphics of the East", XII, 1958, p. 62-66. Tenishev E.R. Ancient Trkic epygraphics of Altai. "Trkological Collection", ., 1966, p. 262-265. Tenishev E.R. Concept "All-Trkic status". "Soviet Trkology", 1971, No 2, p. 13 -16.

Tenishev E.R. Slotted consonants in the language of Trkic runic monuments. "Soviet Trkology", 1973 , No 2, p. 40-45. Tenishev E.R. Trkic historical dialectology and Mahmud Kashgari. "Soviet Trkology", 1973, No 6, p. 54-61. Tenishev E.R. Reflection of dialects in Trkic runic and Uigur inscriptions. "Soviet Trkology", 1976, No 1. Tenishev E. R. Super- dialectal character of Trkic runic monuments language. Trkologica. To the 70eth anniversary of Acad. A.N.Kononov. L., 1976. Tenishev E.R. Language of Ancient and Middle Trkic written monuments in functional aspect. "Questions of linguistics", 1979, No 2. Tolstov S.P. Ancient Chorasm. Attempt of historical - archeological research. ., 1948. Tolstov S.P. Tracing the ancient Chorasmian civilizations. M -L, 1948. Tolstov S.P. Oguzes, Badjanks, the Daukar Sea. "Soviet Ethnography"; 1950, No 4. Tolstov S.P. Work of Chorasmian expedition of USSR Academy of Sciences on excavation of 4th-3rd centuries BC Koy-Krylgan monument. "Bulletin of ancient history", 1953, No 1, p. 163, 169. Thomsen V. Deciphering of Orkhon and Yenisei inscriptions. "Notes of Eastern branch of Russian archeological society" (ZVO Russian Archeological Society), vol. VIII, issue III -IV, SPb., 1894. Toporov V. N. Reconstruction of some mythological beliefs (by materials of Buddhist fine arts). "Peoples of Asia and Africa", 1964, No 3, p. 101 -110. Tochar languages. Coll. of Articles. Redaction and introduction by V.V.Ivanov. IIL, ., 1959. Trever K.V. Monuments of Greek-Baktrian arts. M.-L., 1940. Tuvan- Russian dictionary. , ., 1955. Tuvan- Russian dictionary. Redaction by E.R.Tenishev. ., 1968. Tugusheva L. . Orhono - Trkic and ancient Uigur languages, their similarity and distinction. "Trkological Collection - 1974", ., 1978. Turaev B.A. History of the Ancient East, vol. 1, L., 1935. Turchaninov G.F. Literary and linguistic monuments of Cauc asus and Eastern Europe peoples. L., 1971. ieqabylly . Shipagerlik bayan. Almaty, 1996. Trkological research. M. -L., 1963. Trkological collection, I, M. -L., 1951. Trkological collection (To A.N.Kononova's 60 - anniversary). ., 1966. Trkological collection. 1970, M., 197. Trkological collection. 1971. ., 1972. Trkological collection. 1972. ., 1973. Trkological collection. 1974. ., 1978. Trkological collection. 1975. ., 1978. Trkological collection. 1977. ., 1981.

U
Uzbek-Russian dictionar y. Redaction by A.K.Borovkov. ., 1959. Uigur- Russian dictionary. Redaction by S.Kibirev and .Tsunvazo. Alma -Ata, 1961. Umnyakov I.I. Tocharian problem. "Bulletin of ancient history", 1940, No 3 -4 (12-13), p. 181-193. Umnyakov I.I. Tochars and Tochar question. "Works of UzGU", New series, No31, Hist.philologist. Sciences Series, issue I, Samarkand, 1946, p. 15 -22. Ungvitskaya M.A. Monuments of Yenisei writing and song folklore of Khakasses. "Soviet Trkology", 1971, No 5, p. 61 -72.

Fedotov M.R. Chuvash language in family of Altai languages. Cheboksary, 1980 (Part I), 1983 (Part II), 1986 (Part III). Theoeophilakt Simokatta. History. Translation by S.P.Kondratiev. ., 1957. Formozov A.A. Petroglyphs of Ural and Kazakhstan of Bronze epoch and their semant ics. "Soviet Ethnography", 1950, No 3. Formozov A.A. Monuments of primitive art in the USSR territory, ., 1966. Formozov A.A.Treatise on primitive art. ., 1969. Freiman A.A. Tocharian question and its resolution in (USSR) domestic science. "Scientific notes of LGU". No 128, Orientology sciences series, issue 3, L., 1952, p. 123 -135. Fridrih I. Deciphering of forgotten scripts and languages. ., 1961 (translation from German). Fridrih I. History of writing. ., 1979 (translation from German). Fan Tszya-shen. Runic inscription from Eastern Mongolia. (Attempt of decoding). "Soviet Ethnography", 1959, No 1, p. 3-6.

K
Khabichev M. A. Ancient Trkic runic inscriptions in Alanian catacombs. "Soviet Trkology", 1970, No 2, p. 64-69. Khabichev M. A. About runes and tamgas. "Philological etudes", Series "Linguistics", issue I, Rostov university Edition, Rostov-on-Don, 1972, p. 131-143. Khakimzyanov F.S. Epitaph language of Volga Bulgars. ., 1978. Cincius V.I. Problems of comparative-historical study of Altai languages lexicon. L., 1979.

Ch
Cheremisov K.M., Rumyantsev G. N. Mongol-Russian dictionary, L., 1937. Cheremisov K.M. Buryat-Mongol- Russian dictionary. ., 1951. Chernikov S.S. Petroglyphs of Irtysh upper course. "Soviet Archeology", IX, M. -L., 1947. Chernikov S.S. Find of Paleolithic sites in Eastern Kazakhstan. "Bulletin of KazSSR Academy of Sciences", 1951, No 12. Chlenova N. L. Scythian deer. "Materials and research in archeology of USSR", No 115, Monuments of Scythian- Sarmatian culture. ., 1962. Chuvash-R ussian dictionary. Editor M.I.Skvortsov. ., 1982.

Sh
Shayhulov A.G. Introduction to study of the Altai languages. Ufa, 1984. Sharaf G. Adoption for Trkic nations of Roman alphabet. Kazan, 1926. Shatsky G.V. Graphics on stone. Tashkent, 1973. Shevoroshki n V.V. Research in decoding of Karian inscriptions. ., 1965. Shevoroshkin V.V. Lidian language. ., 1967. Shifman I. Sh. Phoenician language. ., 1963.

Sch
Scherbak A.M. A few words about methods of reading the runic inscriptions found in Don area. Coll . "Soviet Archeology", XIX, ., 1954, p. 269 -282. Scherbak A.M. Signs on ceramics and bricks from Sarkel White Fort. (Question about language and writing of Badjanks). "Materials and research in USSR archeology", No 75, Works of Volga-Don archeological expedition, vol. II, M.-L., 1959. Scherbak A.M. Once again about coins with runic inscriptions from Minusinsk, "Bulletin of ancient history", I960, No 2, p. 139-141. Scherbak A.M. Names of domestic and wild animals in Trkic languages. Coll. "Historical devel opment of lexicon in Trkic languages", ., 1961, p. 82 -172. Scherbak A.M. New runic inscription on stone. "Scientific notes of Tuva NIIYALI", issue IX, 1961, p. 238-241.

Scherbak A.M. Grammatical sketch of language of 10th - 13th centuries Trkic texts from Eastern Turkestan. M.-L., 1961. Scherbak A.M. Monuments of runic writing of Yenisei Trks. "Peoples of Asia and Africa", 1964. No 4, p. 141-148. Scherbak A.M. Trkic vowels in a quantitative sense. "Trkological Collection", ., 1966, p. 146-162. Scherbak A.M. Comparative phonetics of Trkic languages. L., 1970. Scherbak A.M. Enisey runic inscriptions. History of discovery and study. "Trkological Collection. 1970", ., 1970, p. 111 -134. Scherbak A.M. Runic writing in southeast of Europe. "Soviet Trkology ", 1971, No 4, p. 7682. Scherbak A.M. V.V.Radlov and study of runic writing monuments. "Trkological Collection. 1971", ., 1972, p. 54 -63. Scherbak A.M., P.M.Melioransky and study of Trkic writing monuments. "Trkological Collection - 1972", ., 1973, p . 24-35. Scherbak A.M. Once more about question of reconstruction Trkic anlaut archetype j ~... ~z~~~s... "Soviet Trkology", 1974, No 4, p. 80 -84.

dakhin K.K. Kirgiz -Russian dictionary. M., 1940. dakhin K.K. Kirgiz - Russian dictionary. ., 1965. s upov G.V. Introduction to the Bulgaro-Tatar epigraphic. M.-L., 1960.

Ya
Yadrintsev N. M. Report of expedition to Orkhon in 1889 on behalf of Eastern Siberian Department of the Imperial Geographical society (Geographical diary). - Collection of works of Orkhon expedition, I, SPb., 1892, p. 51-113. Yadrintsev N. M. Report and a diary about travel across Orkhon and in Southern Hangay in 1891 - Collection of works of Orkhon expedition, V, SPb., 1901. Languages of USSR peoples, vol. II. Trkic languages. ., 19 66. Yakovlev N. Development and upcoming problems of Latinization of alphabets. "Revolution and writing", 1936, No 2. Yampolsky Z. Most ancient information about Trks in the Azerbaijan area. Scientific notes AzGU" (Baku), Series of language and literature , 1966, No 2, p. 62-64.

Non-Translated Section (Latin alphabet)

A
llheim F. Hmnische Runen. - Hallische Monographien, Nr. l, Halle (Saale), 1948. llheim F. Geschichte der Hunnen. Bd. I, Kapitel 11 ("Hunnische und alttrkische Runen"), Berlin, 1959. Amanjolov A. An "Ancient Greek" inscription from the region of Alma -Ata. "Archiv Orientlni", vol. 35, Praha, 1967, pp. 89 -94. Amanjolov A. S. Forefather Goat or the Ancient Trkic Inscription in Early Greek Alphabet. "Archiv Orientlni", vol. 42, Praha, 1974 , pp. 33-36. Amanjolov A.S. Kazakistan'da bulunan in aynas ile Sasani tabagi'ndaki runik Trk yazlar . "Trk Dili Aratrmalar ' YiWgi", Belleten - 1993, Ankara, 1995, s. 115-1,19. Anciens caracteres, trouves sur de pierres de taille et de monum ents au bord de l'Orkhon dans laMongolie orientale par l ' expedition de M. N. Jadrientseff en 1899. SPb., 1890. Arat R. R. Kutadgu bilig, I. Metin, istanbul, 1947. Aspelin J. R. Fels-und Stein- Inschriften am oberen Jenissei, "Zeitschrift fr Ethnologic", XIX, Berlin, 1887, SS. 529-531.

Aspelin J. Die Jenisei- Inschriften, "Zeitschrift fr Ethnologie", XXI, Berlin, 1889, SS. 744 746.

B
Babinger F r. Ein schriftgeschichtliche Ratsel. "Revue Orientale pr le Etudes Oural Altaiques", XIV, Paris, 1913, pp. 4-19. Bailey H. W. Ttaugara. "Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies" (BSOS), vol. VIII (1936), part 4. Bailey H. W. Recent Work in "Tokharian." Transactions of the Philological Society, 1.948. pp. 126-153. Bailey H. W. The Stael-Holstein Miscellany, "Asia Major", New Series, vol. 11 (1951), part 3. Bailey H. W. The Date of the Stael -Holstein Roll. "Asia Major", New Series, vol. IV (1954), part 1. Bailey H. W. Languages of the Saka. "Handbuch der Qrientalistik", Abt, I, Bd. IV, Absch. 1. Linguistik. Leiden- Kln, 1958. Bang W. Zu den kktrkischen Inschriften. "T'oimg Pao" (Leiden), IX, 1898, SS. 117 -141. Bang W. Zu den kktrkischen Inschriften und den turkischen Turfan -Fragmenten. "Wiener Zeitschrift fur die Kunde des Morgenlandes", XXIII, 1909, SS. 415 -419. Bang W. Turcica. "Mitteilungen der Vorderasiatische Gesellschaft", Jahrgang 1916, Leipzig, 1917, Bartholomae Ch. Altiranisches Worterbuch. 2. unveranderte Auflage. Berlin, 1961. Bazin L. Un text prototurk du IV siecle: le distique Hioung -nu Tsin chou. "Oriens", vol. I, n. 2. Bazin L. Notes sur le mots 'ouz' et 'rrk.' "Oriens", 6/2, 1953, pp. 315 -322. Bazin L. L'inscription d'Uyug- Tarli'q. "Ata Orientalia", XXII, Kopenhagen, 1957, pp. 1 -7. Bazin L. La turcologie: bilan provisoire. "Diogene", N 24, G allimard, 1958. Bazin L. La litterature epigraphique turque ancienne. - Philologiae turcicae fundamenta, vol. 2. Wiesbaden, 1965, pp. 192-211. 1CHET E. Le inscriptions turques de l'Orkhon. "Revue archeologique" (Paris), vol. XXXII, 1898, pp. 356-382; vol. XXXIII, 1898, pp. 352-365. Boodberg P. A. Two Notes on History of the Chinese Frontier, 2. "Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies", vol. I, Numbers 3-4, Harvard-Yenching Institute, 1936, pp. 290-291. Brockelmann C. Mitteltiirkischer Wortschatz nach Mahmud al-Kasgaris Divan Lugat at-turk. Budapest-Leipzig, 1928. Brockelmann C. Zu den altturkischen Inschriften aus dem lenissei -Gebiet. "Ural-altaische Jahrbcher", XXIV, Wiesbaden, 1952, SS. 137 -142.

C
Caferoglu A. Trk dili tarihi, I -II. 3. baski. Istanbul, 1984. Clauson G. The Geographical Names in the Stael -Holstein Scroll. "Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society" (JRAS), 1931. Clauson G. The Ongin inscription. "Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland", London, 1957, parts 3-4.342 Slauson G. Turkish and Mongolian Studies. London, 1962. Clauson G. The diffusion of writing in the Altaic world. - In: "Aspects of Altaic civilization", Indiana University Publications. Uralic and Altaic Series, vol. 23, Bloomington, 1963, pp. 139-144. Claus on G. The origin of the Trkish "runic" alphabet. "Ata Orientalia" (Havniae), XXXII, 1970, pp. 51-76. Clauson G. Some notes on the inscription of Tonuquq. "Studia Turcica", Budapest, 1971, pp. 125-132. Clauson G. An Etymological Dictionary of Pre -thirteenth-Century Turkish. Oxford, 1972,

Cohen M. La grande invention de l'ecriture et son evolution. Paris, 1958.

D
Diringer D. The Alphabet. A Key to the History of Mankind. London, 1953. Diringer D. Writing. London, 1962. Doerfer G. Trkische und Mongolische Elemente irn Neupersischen, I-IV. Wiesbaden, 19631975. Doerfer G. Bemerkungen zur Methodik der trkischen Lautlehre. "Orientalistische Literaturzcitung" (Berlin), LXVI, 7-8, 1971, S. 325-344. Doerfer G. Bemerkungen zu Talt Tekins "Orhon Yazitlari". "Trk Dilleri Aratirmalari 1992", Ankara, 1992, ss. 5-17. Donner K. und Rsnen M. Zwei neue trkische Runeninschriften. JSFOu, LXV, 2, Helsmgfors, 1931. Donner O. Worterverzeichniss zu den Inscriptions de l'Ienissei ', MSFOu, IV, Helsingfors, 1892. Donner O. Inscriptions en caracteres de l'Ienissei '. Systeme d'ecriture. Langue. "Inscriptions de l'Orkhon recuellies par G expedition Finooise 1890etpub! iees par la Societe Finno-Ougrienne", Helsingfors, 1892, pp. XL-XLIV (XXXIX-XLIX). Donner . Sur Toriine de Palphabet tre du nord de PAsie, JSFOu, XIV, l, Helsingfors, 1896, pp. 1-71. Driver G. K. Semitic Writing from Pictograph to Alphabet. London, 1948. Drouin E. Sur queiques monnaies turco-chinoises, "Revue numismatique", IX, Paris, 1891, p. 466. Drouin E. La monnaie bilingue de Minoussinsk. - "Bulletin de Numismatique", VIII, Paris, 1892, pp. 133-135. Dubs H. H. A Roman city in ancient China. The China Society, London, 1957.

E
[Emre] Ahmet Cevat. Alfabenin menei. En eski trk yazisidir. istanbul, 1933. Em re A. C. Eski Trk yazisinin menegi. (Sur Toriine de l ' Alphabet vieux -turc). istanbul, 1938. Emre A. C. Trk dilbilgisi, istanbul, 1945 (1946). Emre A. C. Trk lehelerinin mukayeseli grameri, I. Phonetik. istanbul, 1949. Emre A. C. Le probleme de la p arenle de langues turques et indoeuropeennes, Ankara, 1960. Erdberg Consten E. von. The deer in early Chinese art. "Artibus Asiae", vol. XXVI, 3 -4, Ascona, 1963. Ergin M. Orhun bideleri, istanbul, 1975 (nc baski),

F
Falkenstein A. Das Sumerische. "Handbuch der Orientalistik", Abt. I, Bd, II, Absch. 1 -2, Geschichte der Forschmg, Sprache und Literatr. Leiden, 1959. Fldes - Papp K. Vom Felsbild zum Alphabet. Die Geschichte der Schrift von ihren frhesten Vorstufen bis zur modernen Lateinischen Schreib schrift. Stuttgart, 1966. Friedrich J. Hethitisches Worterbuch. Heidelberg, 1952, 1957, 1961. Friedrich J. Entzifferang verschollener Schriften und Sprachen. Berlin, 1954. Friedrich J. Geschichte de Schrift. Unter bezonderer Bercksichtung ihrer geistige n Entwicklung. Heidelberg, 1966.

G
Gabain A. von. Alttrkische Grammatik. 2. verbesserte Auflage. Leipzig, 1950; 3. Auflage. Wiesbaden, 1974.

Gabain A. von. Alttrkisches Schrifttum. "Sitzungsberichte der Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin", Philosophisch-historische Klasse, Jahrgang 1948, No. III, Berlin, 1950. Gabain A. von. Inhalt und magische Bedeutung der alttrkischen Inschriften. "Antropos" (Revue Internationale d'Ethnologie et de Linguistique), Vol. 48, Fasc. 3 -4, Freiburg, 1953. Gabai n A. von. und Winter W. Trkische Turfantexte IX. "Abhandlungen der Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften z Berlin", Klasse flir Sprachen, Literatr und Kunst. Jahrgang, 1956, Nr. 2. Berlin, 1958. Gabain A. von. Das alttrkische. - Philologiae turcicae fundamenta, vol. L Wiesbaden, 1959. Gabain A. von. Alttrkische Schreibkultur und Druckerei. - Philologiae turcicae fundamenta, vol. 2. Wiesbaden, 1965, SS. 172-210. Gabain A. von. Die alttrkische Literatr. -Philologiae turcicae fundamenta, vol. 2. Wiesbaden, 1965, SS. 211-242. Gabain A. von. Eski Trkenin Grameri. eviren: M. Akalin. Ankara, 1995. Gauthiot R. De l'alphabet sogdien. "Journal Asiatique", 10 serie, vol. XVIII. Paris, 1911, Janv.-Fevr., pp. 81-95. Ghirshman R. Begram. Recherches archeologiqu es et historiques sur le Kouchans. Le Caire, 1946. Ghirshman R. Le Chionites-hephtalites. Le Caire, 1948. Giraud R. L'inscription de Bain-Tsokto, Edition critique. Paris, 1961.

H
Harmatta J. Cusanica. "Ata Orientalia Hungaricae", vol. XI, fasc. 1 -3, Budapest, 1960. Harva U. Die religisen Vbrstellugen der altaischen Vlker. Porvoo -Helsinki, 1938. Heikel H. J. Altertmer aus dem Tale de Tala in Turkestan. "Travaux ethnographique", VII, Helsinki, 1918. Henning W. B. Argi and the "Tokharians." BSOS, vol. IX (1938), part 3, pp. 545-571. Henning W. B. The date of the Sogdian ancient letters. BSOAS, vol. XII (1948), part 3 -4. Hirth F. Nachworte zur Inschrift de Tonjukuk, Zeit de Ku -tu-lu (Ilteres Khan). - Die alttrkischen Inschriften in der Mongolei, Zw eite Folgc. SPb., 1899, SS. 1-140. Inscriptions de l'Orkhon recueillies par 1'expedition finnoise 1890, et publiees par la Societe Finno-Ougrienne. Helsingfors, 1892.

I
Inscriptions de l'Ienissei recueillies et publiees par la Societe Finlandaise d'Archeo logie. Helsingfors, 1889.

J
Jensen H. Die Schrift in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart, 2. neubearbeitete und erweiterte Auflage, Berlin, 1958.

K
Klaproth J. Memoires relatifs l'Asie (Sur quelques antiquites de la Siberie). Paris, 1824. Konow St. Vedic "dasyu", Toxri "daha." - Festschrift Vilhelm Thomsen (zur Vollendung de siebzigsten Lebensjahres am 25. Januar 1912). Von Freunden und Schlern. Leipzig, 1912, SS. 96-97. Kotwicz W. et Samoilovitsch A. Le monument tre d'Ikhe -khochotu en Mongolie centrale. "Rocznik Orientalistyczny", vol. IV (1926), L wow, 1928, pp. 60 -107. Kotwicz W. Contributions l'histoire de l'Asie Centrale. "Rocznik Orientalistyczny", vol. XV, 1949.

Krmsky I, ber der Ursprung und die Funktion der Vokalharmonie in den Ural -Altaisehen Sprachen. "Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenlandischen Gesellschaft", WITH VI, I, Leipzig Wiesbaden, 1956. Krause W. Tocharisch. "Handbuch der Orientalistik", Bd. IV, Abschnit 3, Leiden, 1955. Kurat A. H. Peenek tarihi. Istanbul, 1937.

L
Le COQ A. von. Kktrkisches aus Turfan. "Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften", Phil.-hist. Ciasse, Berlin, 1909, XI. Le COQ A. von. Tilrkische Manichaica aus Chotscho, I -III. "Abhandlungen der K. Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften", Philosop hisch-historische Kiasse, Berlin, 1911, 1919, 1922.

M
Mahrnud Kasgarli. Divan lgat -it-trk tercmesi, eviren Besim Atalay, cilt I -III, Ankara, 1939, 1940, 1941. Marquart J. Die chronologic der alttrkischen Inschriften. Leipzig, 1898. Messerschmidt D. G. Forschungsreise durch Sibirien, 1720 -1727,1.1, Berlin, 1962. Matsuda H. The Geo-historical studies on the ancient Tien -Shan region. Tokyo, 1955. Moorhouse A. C. The Triumph of the Alphabet. A History of Writing, New -York, 1953. Mullen F. W. K. Bin irani sches Sprachdenkmal aus der nrdlichen Mongolei. SPAW, 1909, XXVII. Munkacsi B. Die Bedeutung de Namens der Trken. "Krsi Csoma -Archivum", I, l, 1921. Menges K. H. The Trkic languages and peoples. (An introduction to Trkic Studies). Wiesbaden, 1968.

N
Nebesky-Wojkowitz R. M. de. Oracles and Demons of Tibet. The Cult and Iconography of the Tibetan Protective Deities. Oxford University Press, London, 1956. Nemeth J. Zm Kenntnis der Petschenegen. "Krsi Csoma -Archivum", I, 3, 1922. Nemeth J. Der Volksna me Trk. "Krsi Csoma -Archivum", II, 4, 1926. Nemeth J. Die kktrkischen Grabinschriften aus dem Tale de Tala in Turkestan. "Krsi Csoma-Archivum", 1-2, Budapest, 1926, SS. 137-138. Nemeth J. Die Inschriften de Schatzes von Nagy -Szent-Miklos. Bibl iotheka rientalis Hungarica, II. Budapest-Leipzig, 1932. Nemeth J. The runform inscriptions from Nagy -Szent-Miklos and the runiform scripts of Eastern Europe. "Ata Linguistica Scientiarum Hungaricae", vol. XXI, 1 -2, Budapest, 1971, pp. 1-52.

O
Orkun H. N. Eski trkyazitlari, I -IV. istanbul, 1936, 1939, 1940, 1941; 2. baski. Ankara, 1987.

P
Peliot P. A propos du "Tokharien." - "T'oung Pao", XXXII, 1936. P h i l o l o g i a e turcicae fmdamenta, vol. I. Wiesbaden, 1959. P h i l o l o g i a e turcicae fu ndamenta, vol. 2. Wiesbaden, 1965. Poppe N. Vergleichende Grammatik der Altaischen Sprachen, I. Vergleichende Lautlehre. Wiesbaden, 1960. Poppe N. N. Introduction to Altaic Linguistics. Wiesbaden, 1965. P o u c h a P. Thesaurus linguae Tocharicae dialecti A. Praha, 1955. Pritsak O. Das Alttrkische. - "Handbuch der Orientalistik", Bd. V, Altaistics, Abschnitt l, Trkologie. Leiden -Kln, 1963.

Pulleyblank E. G. The background of the rebellion of An Lu -Shan. London, 1955. Pulleyblank E. G. The Chinese name fo r the Trks. "Journal of the American Oriental Society", 85/2, 1965.

R
Radloff W. Atlas der Alterthmer der Mongolei. Arbeiten der Orchon -Expedition. I-IV. SPb., 1892, 1893, 1896, 1899. Radloff W. Die alttrkischen Inschriften der Mongolei, I. Das Denkmal zu Ehren de Prinzen Kl Tegin. SPb., 1894. Radloff W, Die alttrkischen Inschriften der Mongolei, SPb., 1895. Radloff W. Die alttrkischen Inschriften der Mongolei. Neue Folge. St. -Petersburg, 1897. Radloff W. Die alttrkischen Inschriften der Mongolei. Zweite Folge. Die Inschrift de Tonjukuk. SPb., 1899. Radloff W. Zur Geschichte de trkischen Vokalsystems. - "News of the Academy of sciences", XIV, No 4, SPb., 1901, p. 425 -462. Radloff W. Die vorislamischen Schriftarten der Trken und ilr Verhaltni ss zu der Sprache derselben. - "News of the Academy of sciences", VI series, 1908 No 10 with 835 -856. Radloff W. Alttrkische Studien, I -VI - "News of the Academy of sciences", SPb., 1909 1912. Radloff W. Tisastvustik, ein in trkischer Sprache bearbeitet es buddistisches Stra. "Bibliotheca Buddhica", XII, SPb., 1910. Ramstedt G. J. Zwei uigurische Runeninschriften in der Nord -Mongolei. "Journal de la Societe Finno-Ougrienne" [JSFOu], XXX, 3, Helsingfors, 1913. Ramstedt G. J. The relations of the Aitaic la nguages to other languages groups. JSFO , vol. LIII, 1, Helsinki, 1946/47. Ramstedt G. J. Einfhrung in die altaische Sprachwissenschaft, I. Lautlehrc. Bearbeitet und herausgegeben von Pentti Aalto. Helsinki, 1957. Rarnstedt G. J. Einfhrung in die altai sche Sprachwissenschaft. Formenlehre. Bearbeitet und herausgegeben von Pentti Aalto. Helsinki, 1952. Ramstedt G. J., Gran J. G. und Pentti Aalto. Materialien zu den alt.turkisch.en Tnschriften derMongolei. JSFOu, vol. LX, 7, Helsinki, 1958, SS. 30 -61. Rii snen M. Beitrge zu den trkischen Runeninschriften. "Studia Orientalia", XVII, 6, Helsinki, 1952. Rasanen M. Materialien zur Morphologic der trkischen Sprachen. Helsinki, 1957. Rasanen M. Vers ch cines etymologischen Worterbuchs der Trksprachen* Hel sinki, 1969.

S
Schifner A. ber verschiedene sibirische Eigenthums -Zeichen, "Melanges russes", vol. IV, 1858, p. 2.; Sertkaya O. F. The first line of the Tonyukuk monument. "Central Asiatic Journal", vol. XXIII, 3-4, 1979, pp. 288-291. Sertkaya O. F. Gk Trk tarihinin meseleleri. Ankara, 1995. Shiratori K. ber die Wu -sun Stamm in Zentralasien. "Keleti Szemle" (Revue Orientale), 1902, 2-3, SS. 103-140. Spassky G. De anttquis quisbusdam sculpturis et inscriptionibus in Sibiria repertis, Petropoli, 1822. Strahlenberg Ph. von. Das Nord- und stliche Theil von Europa und Asia. Stockholm, 1730. Scerbak A. M. L'inscription runique d'Oust -Elegueste (Touva.) "Ural- altaische .Tahrbcher", XXXV, Wiesbaden, 1964, pp. 145-149.

T
Tarn W. W. The Greeks in Baktria and In dia. Cambridge, 1951 (first edition 1938).

Tchlenova N. L. Lecerf scythe. "Artibus Asiae", vol. XXVI 1 Ascona 1963. Tekin T. On Kk Trkic biincagi. "Central Asiatic Journal", vol. VIII, No. 3, The Hague Wiesbaden, 1963, pp. 196-198. Tekin T. On a misinter preted word in the Old Trkic inscriptions. "Ural -altaische Jahrbcher", XXXV, Wiesbaden, 1964, pp. 134 -144. Tekin T. Bir "runik" harfin fonetik deeri hakknda. "Trk Kltrn Aratrma Enstits yaynlan", 19, Seri I, ayi A 2. Ankara, 1966, S. 412 -417. Tekin T. A Grammar of Orkhon Trkic. Bloomington, 968. Tekin T. Orhon yaz 'tlar. Ankara, 1988. Tekin T. Tonyukuk yazt . Ankara, 1994. Tezcan S. Tonyukuk yazitinda birka dzeltme. "Trk Dili Aratirmalari Yilligi - Belleten 1975-1976, Ankara, 1976, ss. 173-181. Thompson E. M, An Introduction to Greek and Latin Palaeography. Oxford, 1912. Thomsen V. Dechifrement de inscriptions de l'Orkhon et de 1'IenisseY. Notice prelininaire. Extrait du "Bulletin de l'Academie R. de Sciences et de Lettres de Danemark", 1893, N 3, Copenhague, 1894. Thomsen V. Inscriptions de G Orkhon dechiffrees. "Memoires de la Societe Finno Ougrienme" [MSFOu], V, Helsingfors, 1984 -1896. Thomsen V. Sur le systeme de consonnes dans la langue ouigoure. "Keleti Szemle", II, Budapest, 1901. Thomsen V. Ein Blatt in Trkischer "Runenscfarift" aus Turfan. SPAW, Phil. -histClasse, 1910, XV. Thomsen V. Dr. M. A. Stein's Manuscripts in Turkish "runic" script from Miran and Tun Huang. "Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society"/JRAS/, London, 1912, January, pp. 181-227. Thomsen V. Turcica. Etudes concernant (' interpretation des inscriptions turques de la Mongolie et de la Siberie. MSFOu, XXXVII, 1916. Thomsen V. Une lettre meconnue des inscription de Henissei '. JSFOu, XXX, 1916, pp. 1 -9. Tho msen V, L'alphabet nmiforme tre. Samlede Afhandlinger, III Bind, Kobenhavn, 1922. Thomson V. ne inscription de la trouvaille d'or der Nagy -Szent-Miklos, Samlede Afhandlinger, III, Kobenhavn, 1922. Thomsen V. Alttrkische Inschriften aus der Mongolei in bersetzung und mit Einleitmg. "Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenlndischen Gesellschaft", Bd. 78, Leipzig, 1924 -1925. Thomsen V. Orhon ve Yenisey yaztlarnn zm. zlm Ornon yazitlari. eviren: V. Kken. Ankara, 1993. Tomas F. W., Konow St. Two Me dieval Documents from Tunhuan . "Oslo Ethnografiske Museums Skifter", Bind III (1929), Hefte 3. Tryjarski E. L'inscription turque runiforme d'Arkhanen en Mongolia, "Ural- ALtaische Jahrbcher", XXXVI, 3 -4, Wiesbaden, 1965, pp. 423-428. Tychsen 0. H. Schrei bcn an Pallas 19 Febr. 1786 ber alte unbekannte Steinschrift in Siberien. - "Neue nrdliche Beitrge", vol. V, SPb., 1793, SS. 237 -245. Tuna . N. On the phonetic values of the symbols used, in some of the text in Kk -Trkish script. "Central Asiatic Journal", vol. XI, No. 4, The Hague-Wiesbaden, 1966. Tuna . N. Smer ve Trk dillerinin trih ilgisi ile Trk dilinin yai meselesi. Ankara, 1997.

V
Vry H. Alttrkische Felszeichnungen in Nordost -Anatolien. "Ural- Altaische Jahrbcher", Band 40, Heft 1-2, Wiesbaden, 1968, SS. 50-78.

W
Windekens V. Le norns de Saces et de Scythes. "Beitrge zuir: Namenforschung", I, 1949, pp. 98-102. Winter W. Tocharians and Trks. - In: "Aspects of Altaic civilization". Indiana University Publications. Uralic and Altaic Series, Vol. 23. Bloomington, 1963.,

The scientific edition Altai Sarsenovich Amanjolov HISTORY AND THE THEORY OF THE ANCIENT TURKIC LETTER It is authorized for printing by the Academic council philological faculty of the Kazakh national university him{it}. al-Farabi Editor I.Krotov Art editor E.Zhaksylykova Technical editor M.Orazbekova Computer imposition Natalia P Computer set KaznagulAlimzhanova IB No 8531 It is handed over in a set 10,07.2002. It is signed in a seal 28.11.2002. A format 60x90 ViePaper offset. Set "Time". A seal offset. Usl.-pech. l. 29,67. Uch.-izd. l. 21,53. Circulation 2000. The order 709. Joint-Stock Company " Publishing house " Mektep", 480009, Almaty, pr. Abaja, 143. Poligrafkombinat corporations " " of Rep ublic Kazakhstan, 480002, Almaty, street. Makataeva, 41. Thomsen V. L'alphabet runiforme turc. Samlede Afhandlinger, III Bind, Kobenhavn, 1922. Thomsen V. line inscription dc la trouvaille d'or der Nagy -Szent-Miklos. Samlede Afhandlinger, III, Kobenhavn, 1922. Thomsen V. Alttrkische Inschriften aus der Mongolei in bersetzung und mit Einleitung. "Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenlndischen Gesellschaft", Bd. 78, Leipzig, 1924 -1925. Thomsen V. Orhon ve Yenisey yaztlarnn zm. zlm Orhon yazitlari. eviren: V. Kken. Ankara, 1993. Tomas F. W. Konow St. Two Medieval Documents from Tunhuang. "Oslo Ethnografiske Museums Ski f ter", Bind III (1929), Hefte 3. Tryjarski E. L'inscription turque runiforme d'Arkhanen en Mongolie. "Ural -Altaische Jahrbcher", XXXVI, 3-4, Wiesbaden, 1965, pp. 423-428. Tychsen O. H. Schreiben an Pallas 19 Febr. 1786 ber alte unbekannte Steinschrift in Siberien. - "Neue nrdliche Beitrage", t. V, SPb., 1793, SS. 237 -245. Tuna . N. On the phonetic values of the symbols used in so me of the text in Kk -Turkish script. "Central Asiatic Journal", vol. XI, No. 4, The Hague -Wiesbaden, 1966. Tuna . N. Smer ve Trk dillerinin trih ilgisi ile Trk dilinin yai meselesi. Ankara, 1997. Vry H. Alttrkische Felszeichnungen in Nordost -Anatolien, "Ural- Altaische Jahrbcher", Band 40, Heft 1-2, Wiesbaden, 1968, SS. 50-78. Windekens V. Le noms de Saces et de Scythes. "Beitrage zur Namenforschung", I, 1949, pp. 98-102. Winter W. Tocharians and Turks. - In: "Aspects of Altaic civilization". Indiana University Publications. Uralic and Altaic Series, Vol. 23. Bloomington, 1963.