Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 36

1

Tight Gas Reservoirs


Professor Ole Torster

11/11/11

Unconventional natural gas resources


What is really considered unconventional natural gas changes with time. However, there are six main categories of unconventional natural gas: Deep gas Tight gas Gas-containing shales Coalbed methane Geopressurized zones Hydrates

Resource Pyramid
Small Volumes
High 1000 md Quality

100 md Medium Quality 1 md 0.1 md

Tight Gas
Large Volumes Gas Shales

0.001 md Coalbed Methane

Low Quality

0.0001 md

Continued Drilling and Development

Increased Demand

Better Technology

Tight natural gas


Permeability less than 0.1md (1*10-16 m2) Porosity approx. 5-15% Limestone or sandstone formations Not readily extractable. We must put more effort into the extraction process than for conventional gas reservoirs; like fracturing, acidizing etc.

Shale gas
In Devonia shales (formed in shallow seas more than 350 million years ago). Permeability in the nanoDarcy range (10-9D or 10-21 m2 ) Difficult to produce due to the properties of shale and therefore the expected recovery of the gas is low. Shale gas is found all over the world.

Shale gas

Statoil

1,8million acres=7300km2

From Statoil.com

10

The Marcellus Shale


Organic rich shale at a depth of approx. 1000m The gas occurs in three ways:
Within the pore space of the shale Within fractures (vertical) and joints in the shale Adsorbed on mineral grains and organic materials

Most of the recoverable gas is contained in the pore space. Natural fracture system is important for well productivity.

11

Coalbed methane
Many coal formations (seams) contain natural gas, either within the seams itself or the surrounding rock. What was once a by-product of the coal industry is becoming an increasingly important source of methane and natural gas.

12

Productivity of tight gas reservoirs

13

Presentation Summary

Some additional information about tight gas reservoirs Conditions generally required for economic tight gas reservoir production Common formation damage types occurring in tight gas reservoirs

14

Conventional vs 'Unconventional' Accumulations


Characteristics of Conventional Accumulations
Relatively high matrix permeability Obvious seals and traps High recovery factors

Characteristics of Unconventional Accumulations


Regional in extent Diffuse boundaries Low matrix permeabilities Low recovery factors Productivity of a tight gas reservoir is only 25% of gas in place in the best case (average 10-15%). Gas connectivity only in 4% of porosity.

From John Lee (Texas A&M University) Advances in Unconventional Resources Technology: Assessment Methodology

15

What controls the ability to economically produce tight gas reserves?


Effective permeability to gas Initial saturation conditions Size of effective sand face drainage area accessed by the completion Reservoir pressure Degree of liquid dropout from gas (rich vs. dry gas)

16

Capillary equilibrium in gas reservoirs High Perm


Capillary Pressure - Psi Relative Permeability Water Saturation

FWC

Water Saturation

Brant Bennion, presentation at Canadian Well Logging Society

17

Capillary equilibrium in gas reservoirs LOW Perm


Capillary Pressure - Psi Relative Permeability Water Saturation

FWC

Water Saturation

Brant Bennion, presentation at Canadian Well Logging Society June 9, 2004

18

Generally if a tight gas matrix is in equilibrium with a free water contact, equilibrium water saturation reduces reserves and effective permeability to gas below the economic limit for production

19

Non - capillary equilibrium in gas reservoirs LOW Perm


Capillary Pressure - Psi Relative Permeability

NO FWC Water Saturation


Brant Bennion, presentation at Canadian Well Logging Society

Water Saturation

20

For significant reserves and mobile gas production in very low perm gas reservoirs, a CAPILLARY SUBNORMAL water saturation condition usually must exist

Water Gauge

21

Subnormally water saturated tight gas reservoirs:


A gas reservoir in which the initial water saturation is less than that which would be achieved on a conventional drainage capillary pressure curve at the effective capillary gradient of the reservoir

22

Some interesting aspects of tight gas relative permeability.

Relative permeability of tight gas reservoirs


Demonstration cross-plot of drainage and imbibition gas-water relative permeability.

23

24

Comparison of relative permeability between conventional and unconventional gas reservoir

Conventional reservoir

Unconventional reservoir

Conventional reservoir: wide range of water saturation where both water and gas can flow. Unconventional reservoir: broad range of water saturation in which neither gas nor water can flow.
Shanley et al. AAPG Bulletin 2004

25

Numerical study

Note crossover, where krg=krw is approximately 67% for all permeabilities but krg value at crossover decreases with decreasing permeability. Dark black horizontal line marks the krg = 2% (0.02). The Sw region where both gas and water have kr < 0.02 broadens as kik decreases.

Capillary pressure of tight gas reservoir


Comparison of capillary pressure between conventional and unconventional gas reservoir

26

Shanley et al. AAPG Bulletin 2004

Relationship between capillary pressure, relative permeability and position within a trap.

27

Shanley et al. AAPG Bulletin 2004

28

Shanley et al. AAPG Bulletin 2004

29

Fracturing of tight gas reservoirs.

30

31

Performance of fractured wells in tight gas reservoirs.

Frac technique: horizontal well with multiple fractures Test rate: 14,000 m3/h vs 4,000 m3/h without technology

Seven Fracture system ready to open sliding sleeves

3.5 increase in well productivity


From Gaz de France

32

Causes of productivity loss of fractured wells in tight gas formation


Rheological fluid properties (affect fracture length) Polymer residus in the fracture (affect fracture conductivity)
with cross-linked fluids up to 90% of conductivity loss optimization of cleaning fluids like "breakers"

Filtration (affects reservoir properties)


fracturing fluid invasion into the reservoir (decrease of the fracture length, reservoir damage around the fracture)

Water blocks (affect gas back flow)


decrease the gas permeability

33

Water blocks investigation.


Aim: Simulation of the filtration of the fracturing fluid and evaluation of damage. Method Cores at Swi (gas) Fracturing fluid filtration with 200 bars on core face Gas backflow at various pressures Water blocks identified by XRay acquisition Results Water saturation profiles Fracturing fluid filtration Gas return permeability 200 bars Conditions of the equipment Direct measurement of water blocks by XRay Temperature: 130C, Pressure 330 bars

Gas Back flow 5, 10, 15 bars

34

Flow rig at Institut Francais du Petrol.

x-ray

fluids core holder

Tmax =130C (210F) Pmax=330bar (4700psi)

35

Workflow for improved predictions


Fracturing fluid selection- Lab study
filtration, absolute permeability damage, measurement of in situ saturation (water blocks), petrophysics (capillary curves)

Modeling at laboratory scale

Modelling parameters Reservoir and fracture description


cake properties, absolute permeability reduction, relative permeability curves permeability hysteresis

Near Wellbore Simulator Well Productivity Evaluation

36

Conclusions
Tight gas reservoirs have a huge future potential for production. Generally to be economic tight gas reservoirs are normally in a subnormal water saturation condition. Fluid trapping (water blocks) tends to be a dominant damage mechanism for tight gas reservoirs. Productivity prediction is almost impossible without detailed petrophysics data measured in representative conditions (stress, hysteresis, capillary pressure...)

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi