Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
OH
HCHO
N O
Ph
NH Ph
2
PEG-400
2 1 3a
4a
OH
NH Ph
2
O
N
Ph
HCHO
PEG-400
2 5 3a 6a
Scheme 1.
In further set of experiments, optimized reaction condition was applied for the synthesis of another 1,3-oxazine
derivative replacing a-naphthol with b-naphthol (Scheme 1). In this experiment, reaction of b-naphthol, aniline and
formaldehyde was subjected to optimized reaction conditions and reaction was observed to proceed smoothly in
agreement with the reaction of a-naphthol.
This success of PEG 400 could be attributed to the following facts: (i) PEG possess two active sites viz. free
hydroxyl groups and ethereal oxygen linkages. (ii) These hydroxyl groups, via hydrogen bonding with carbonyl
oxygen of formaldehyde increases its electrophilic character, whereas, ethereal oxygen linkages assists in enhancing
the nucleophilicity of amines and naphthols. (iii) Consequently, the chemical reactivity of the reactants considerably
increases, which results in signicant rate acceleration of chemical reaction leading to the formation of desired product
within short reaction times, avoiding undesirable side products.
P.V. Shinde et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters 22 (2011) 915918 917
Table 1
Screening of reaction medium.
a
Entry PEG 400 (mL) Solvent (mL) Time (min) Yield
b
(%)
1 30 Trace
2
c
0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, 1.0 20, 10, 5, 5,5 77, 78, 91, 87, 88
3 0.3 Water (5) 30 59
4 0.3 Ethanol (5) 30 67
5 0.3 DMF (5) 30 38
6 0.3 THF (5) 30 45
7 0.3 CH
3
CN (5) 30 62
a
Reaction conditions: 1 (1 mmol), 2 (2.2 mmol), 3a (1 mmol).
b
Isolated yields.
c
Consider respective time and yield.
Table 2
Synthesis of 1,3-oxazine derivatives.
a
OH
OH
NH
2
O
N
R
N O
2 CH
2
O
PEG-400
1
5
PEG-400
2 3
4a-h
6a-j
R
R
.
Product code R Compound 4ah Compound 6aj
Time (min) Yield
b
(%) M.P.
c
(8C) Time (min) Yield
b
(%) M.P.
c
(8C)
a H 5 91 6365 5 89 5052
b 2-Me 5 89 8788 10 90 5557
c 4-Me 10 86 193195 10 85 9091
d 3-OMe 15 91 278 (d) 15 88 6566
e 4-OMe 10 88 301 (d) 10 85 7980
f 2-OEt 10 85 202 (d) 15 87 102104
g 4-OEt 10 87 7880 10 84 6869
h 4-F 5 92 117118 10 91 134135
i 2-NO
2
# # # 15 85 113115
j 4-NO
2
# # # 15 86 166168
# reaction was not performed.
a
Reaction conditions: 1 or 5 (1 mmol), 2 (2.2 mmol), 3 (1 mmol) and PEG-400 (0.3 mL).
b
Isolated yields.
c
Melting points match with literature [20].
To further establish the scope of optimized reaction conditions and in order to generalize the synthetic procedure,
variety of electronically divergent aromatic amines were treated with a-naphthol as well as b-naphthol and
formaldehyde solution, and all these substrates were found to be equally amenable to these conditions affording good
to excellent yields (see the supporting information). Notably, liquid amines underwent the reaction rapidly in
comparison with solid amines. Representative results are summarized in Table 2. Structures of the products were
conrmed on the basis of IR,
1
H NMR,
13
C NMR and mass spectroscopic data.
3. Conclusions
In summary, we have developed an exceedingly simple, mild, clean and expeditious synthetic protocol for 1,3-
oxazine derivatives. Remarkable advantages of this synthetic strategy over the others are (i) high yields, (ii) no need of
acid/base catalyst and solvent, (iii) decreased reaction times, (iv) simplied work-up procedure, and (v) ambient
reaction temperature.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/
j.cclet.2011.01.011.
References
[1] I.T. Horvath, P.T. Anastas, Chem. Rev. 107 (2007) 2169.
[2] N.R. Candeias, L.C. Branco, P.M.P. Gois, et al. Chem. Rev. 109 (2009) 2703.
[3] I.T. Horvath, Green Chem. 10 (2008) 1024.
[4] R. Kumar, P. Chaudhary, S. Nimesh, R. Chandra, Green Chem. 8 (2006) 356.
[5] C.K.Z. Andrade, L.M. Alves, Curr. Org. Chem. 9 (2005) 195.
[6] J.R. Mali, D.V. Jawale, B.S. Londhe, R.A. Mane, Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 3 (2010) 209.
[7] S. Chandrasekhar, C. Narsihmulu, S.S. Sultana, N.R. Reddy, Org. Lett. 4 (2002) 4399.
[8] C. Mukhopadhyay, P.K. Tapaswi, Tetrahedron Lett. 49 (2008) 6237.
[9] N. Suryakiran, T.S. Reddy, K. Ashalatha, et al. Tetrahedron Lett. 47 (2006) 3853.
[10] Z. Turgut, E. Pelit, A. Koyeu, Molecules 12 (2007) 345.
[11] T. Kurtz, Tetrahedron 61 (2005) 3091.
[12] M. Adib, E. Sheibani, M. Mosto, et al. Tetrahedron 62 (2006) 3435.
[13] H.V. Poel, G. Guilaumet, M. Viaud-Massuard, Tetrahedron Lett. 43 (2002) 1205.
[14] A.J. Cocuzza, D.R. Chidester, B.C. Cordova, et al. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 11 (2001) 1177.
[15] N. Kajino, Y. Shibouta, K. Nishikawa, et al. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 11 (1991) 2896.
[16] B.O. Buckman, R. Mohan, S. Koovakkat, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 8 (1998) 2235.
[17] Y. Katsura, S. Nishino, H. Takasugi, Chem. Pharm. Bull. 11 (1991) 2937.
[18] J.N. Joyce, S. Presgraves, L. Renish, et al. Exp. Neurol. 184 (2003) 393.
[19] F.A. Kerdesky, Tetrahedron Lett. 46 (2005) 1711.
[20] (a) B.P. Mathew, M. Nath, J. Heterocycl. Chem. 46 (2009) 1003;
(b) A.H. Kategaonkar, S.S. Sonar, R.U. Pokalwar, et al. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 31 (2010) 1657;
(c) S.B. Sapkal, K.F. Shelke, B.B. Shingate, M.S. Shingare, J. Korean Chem. Soc. 54 (2010) 437;
(d) S.A. Sadaphal, S.S. Sonar, B.B. Shingate, M.S. Shingare, Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 3 (2010) 213;
(e) S. Tumtin, I.T. Phucho, A. Nongpiur, et al. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 47 (2010) 125.
[21] (a) S.B. Sapkal, K.F. Shelke, B.B. Shingate, M.S. Shingare, Tetrahedron Lett. 50 (2009) 1754;
(b) P.V. Shinde, S.S. Sonar, B.B. Shingate, M.S. Shingare, Tetrahedron Lett. 51 (2010) 1309;
(c) K.S. Niralwad, B.B. Shingate, M.S. Shingare, Tetrahedron Lett. 51 (2010) 3616.
P.V. Shinde et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters 22 (2011) 915918 918