Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
=
i
i
n
x
x = standard deviation
n
x x
s
i
i
=
2
) (
=
c) mean =
n
n n
f f f f
f x f x f x f x
x Mean
+ + + +
+ + + +
=
...
...
) (
3 2 1
3 3 2 2 1 1
d) standard deviation =
n
n n
f f f f
f x x f x x f x x f x x
+ + + +
+ + + +
...
) ( ... ) ( ) ( ) (
3 2 1
2
3
2
3 2
2
2 1
2
1
n
x x x x x x x x
n
2 2
3
2
2
2
1
) ( ... ) ( ) ( ) ( + + + +
n
n n
f f f f
f x x f x x f x x f x x
+ + + +
+ + + +
...
) ( ... ) ( ) ( ) (
3 2 1
2
3
2
3 2
2
2 1
2
1
Evaluation in Home Economics Page 9
Variance
Variance is the squared standard deviation (s
2
)
Data organization and Presentation
Generally speaking, DATA refers to facts that are gathered in some way, and which
constitute a body of information. In order to be useful, data must not only be organized, but
it should also be able to be represented in some way that comparisons, trends and or
relationships may easily be visualized. Graphs and charts provide such representations.
There are a wide number of types of graphs and charts, but the most common ones are line
graphs, bar graphs, pie charts and histograms.
Line graphs
Line graphs connect data points that are somehow related. For example, a mother may
measure the height of her child every year on that child's birthday. The age of the child and
her height are data that are clearly related, whereas measurements of any child at any time
would not be particularly meaningful. The same thing with students performance over time
or student progress. The graph immediately suggests that the child undergoes a regular
growth between the ages of 1 and 8. It also allows us to have a reasonable estimate of what
the height of the child was at an intermediate age, say 4.5 years, when the height, read from
the graph, would have been about 102 cm.
Evaluation in Home Economics Page 10
Bar graphs
Bar graphs are commonly used to represent qualitative data, consisting of separated, vertical
bars of equal widths whose heights are drawn proportional to the frequencies of the classes
they represent. The example below present 40 students preferred method of teaching.
Method no. students
Lecture 2
Group work 6
Student centred 8
Teacher centered 20
Other 4
0
5
10
15
20
25
Lecture Group
work
Student
centred
Teacher
centered
Other
Method
Prefered Teaching
Method
Evaluation in Home Economics Page 11
Pie charts
Pie charts are useful to show the proportion of certain types of data as parts of a whole. The
"pie" represents the whole, and the segments of the pie represent the proportion of various
data points to that whole. For an example, let us take a school tuckshop that is making an
analysis of its sales. In a given week, it solds goods to a total of P13 414. The amounts
collected for each category of items are tabulated, and the percentage contribution of each
class of items worked out. The resultant pie chart is shown above on the right.
Histograms
Histograms display distributions of quantitative data. Imagine a class of 26 students who
have written a Home Economics test. The scores are arranged in data ranges 0-9, 10-19, and
so on. Against these, the number of learners whose scores fall within these ranges are
tabulated as shown in the table above on the left. A histogram is then drawn, with the count
of learners whose scores fall in each range, as shown above on the right. The bars are also
vertical but joined as compared to bar graphs
Evaluation in Home Economics Page 12
Evaluation in Home Economics Page 13
Item Analysis of Classroom Tests
After you create your objective assessment items and give your test, how can you be sure that
the items are appropriate -- not too difficult and not too easy? How will you know if the test
effectively differentiates between students who do well on the overall test and those who do not?
An item analysis is a valuable, yet relatively easy, procedure that teachers can use to answer both
of these questions.
1. Level of Difficulty
To determine the difficulty level of test items, a measure called the Difficulty I ndex is used. This
measure asks teachers to calculate the proportion of students who answered the test item
accurately. By looking at each alternative (for multiple choice), we can also find out if there are
answer choices that should be replaced. For example, let's say you gave a multiple choice quiz
and there were four answer choices (A, B, C, and D). The following table illustrates how many
students selected each answer choice for Question #1 and #2.
Question A B C D
#1 0 3 24* 3
#2 12* 13 3 2
* Denotes correct answer.
For Question #1, we can see that A was not a very good distractor -- no one selected that answer.
We can also compute the difficulty of the item by dividing the number of students who choose
the correct answer (24) by the number of total students (30). Using this formula, the difficulty of
Question #1 (referred to as p) is equal to 24/30 or .80. A rough "rule-of-thumb" is that if the item
difficulty is more than .75, it is an easy item; if the difficulty is below .25, it is a difficult item.
Given these parameters, this item could be regarded moderately easy -- lots (80%) of students
got it correct. In contrast, Question #2 is much more difficult (12/30 = .40). In fact, on Question
#2, more students selected an incorrect answer (B) than selected the correct answer (A). This
item should be carefully analyzed to ensure that B is an appropriate distractor.
Difficulty I ndex = #of correct
Total #of question
2. Discrimination Test
Another measure, the Discrimination I ndex, refers to how well an assessment differentiates
between high and low scorers. In other words, you should be able to expect that the high-
performing students would select the correct answer for each question more often than the low-
Evaluation in Home Economics Page 14
performing students. If this is true, then the assessment is said to have a positive discrimination
index (between 0 and 1) -- indicating that students who received a high total score chose the
correct answer for a specific item more often than the students who had a lower overall score. If,
however, you find that more of the low-performing students got a specific item correct, then the
item has a negative discrimination index (between -1 and 0). Let's look at an example.
Table 2 displays the results of ten questions on a quiz. Note that the students are arranged with
the top overall scorers at the top of the table.
Student
Total
Score (%)
Questions
1 2 3
Asif 90 1 0 1
Sam 90 1 0 1
Jill 80 0 0 1
Charlie 80 1 0 1
Sonya 70 1 0 1
Ruben 60 1 0 0
Clay 60 1 0 1
Kelley 50 1 1 0
Justin 50 1 1 0
Tonya 40 0 1 0
"1" indicates the answer was correct; "0" indicates it was incorrect.
Follow these steps to determine the Difficulty Index and the Discrimination Index.
1. After the students are arranged with the highest overall scores at the top, count the
number of students in the upper and lower group who got each item correct. For Question
#1, there were 4 students in the top half who got it correct, and 4 students in the bottom
half.
2. Determine the Difficulty Index by dividing the number who got it correct by the total
number of students. For Question #1, this would be 8/10 or p=.80.
3. Determine the Discrimination Index by subtracting the number of students in the lower
group who got the item correct from the number of students in the upper group who got
the item correct. Then, divide by the number of students in each group (in this case, there
Evaluation in Home Economics Page 15
are five in each group). For Question #1, that means you would subtract 4 from 4, and
divide by 5, which results in a Discrimination Index of 0.
4. The answers for Questions 1-3 are provided in Table 2.
discrimination index =#correct(upper) - #correct(lower)
#students per group
Item
# Correct (Upper
group)
# Correct (Lower
group)
Difficulty
(p)
Discrimination
(D)
Question
1
4 4 .80 0
Question
2
0 3 .30 -0.6
Question
3
5 1 .60 0.8
Now that we have the table filled in, what does it mean? We can see that Question #2 had a
difficulty index of .30 (meaning it was quite difficult), and it also had a negative discrimination
index of -0.6 (meaning that the low-performing students were more likely to get this item
correct). This question should be carefully analyzed, and probably deleted or changed. Our
"best" overall question is Question 3, which had a moderate difficulty level (.60), and
discriminated extremely well (0.8).