0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
28 vues2 pages
Describe the process you went through to prepare for your mock trial. What did you and your team do especially well? what could you improve if you were to do it again? Based upon your preparation and effort, what grade do you feel you deserve?
Describe the process you went through to prepare for your mock trial. What did you and your team do especially well? what could you improve if you were to do it again? Based upon your preparation and effort, what grade do you feel you deserve?
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme DOC, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
Describe the process you went through to prepare for your mock trial. What did you and your team do especially well? what could you improve if you were to do it again? Based upon your preparation and effort, what grade do you feel you deserve?
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme DOC, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
Self Evaluation: Please respond to ALL of the following and then you can email your response to me. Dara_martin@gwinnett.k12.ga.us · Describe the process you went through to prepare for your mock trial. · What did you and your team do especially well? What could you improve if you were to do this again? · Did each member of the team contribute equally and with vigor to your presentation? Explain. · Explain your own participation in this project. What did you do that helped your team? · How did this activity enhance your understanding of Julius Caesar and criminal trials? · Any other comments? · Based upon your preparation and effort, what grade do you feel you deserve? Opening Witness Direct Cross Closing Statement Examination Examination Statement Attorney Attorney This role applies This role applies This role applies This role applies This role applies to to you: to to you: to you: ___yes ___no you: ___yes ___no you: ___yes ___no ___yes ___no ___yes ___no •was a short •provided •called the •asked “yes” or •was prepared statement, 2-3 testimony that witness “no” questions during long minutes matched to the witness •avoided pause •took a stand assigned role stand and asked opinion after all that •prepared notes appropriate and open ended witnesses matched your •listed major questions questions had been assigned role points important •attempted to •did not argue examined •supported your for someone in ask with the witness •reflected information from this role questions for a •knew the testimony research notes •stand on the most favorable answer before presented •played a role issue clear and light you asked the during and supported with for this side question the trial and the didn’t sound like specific •asked 3-5 •asked 2-3 information information was information questions questions, if gathered from memorized or •testimony was •kept it simple needed research simply read from consistent with and •asked •developed a the paper the information concise questions statement that provided in your • had a clear to explain, restated your affidavit strategy modify, or position •played a role •played a role discredit what •included facts and didn’t sound and the provided by like information didn’t sound like witness said witnesses during was memorized information was •was especially the trial •listened to memorized careful to be •stated facts to attorneys; courteous undermine the answered the •played a role opponent’s case question asked and didn’t sound •told why client •spoke loudly like information should win and clearly was memorized •played a role and didn’t sound like information was memorized
Possible Possible Possible Possible Possible points:
Julius Caesar Trial Evaluation Checklist points: points: points: points: ___ of 4 ___ of 8 ___ of 6 ____ of 8 ___ of 7 _____ % ______ % _____ % _____ % _____ %