Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
December 2008
Peter Decker’s Old Fences, New Neighbors, and Jonathan Raban’s Bad Land
In Peter Decker’s Old Fences, New Neighbors, and Jonathan Raban’s Bad Land, the authors give
first-hand accounts of the hardships of the homesteading years in the American West. Indeed it is my
point to tell you about the Ismay-Ouray dismay! In Old Fences, New Neighbors, Peter Decker writes,
“The Old West doesn’t have much regard for the New West.” The author of the book’s Forward, Kent
Nelson writes, “the beautiful places the world over are running out.” (pp. xi) Years after writing the
book, in the Preface to the New Edition, the author writes, “What is evident about Ouray Countyis its
struggle to absorb new residents while coming to grips with a tourist economy often at odds with a
traditional agricultural way of life.” Despite the incredible hardships in creating and maintaining a
livelihood in Montana, Jonathan Raban tells us in Bad Land, “It was so empty that two strangers could
feel that they had a common bond simply because they were encircled by the same horizon.” (pp. 6) But
in Montana, the living was real hard, much harder than in Ouray. The two stories are about different
communities and different economies, but the human heart and life at the center is the same. The same
time period yields stories of the Homesteading years (1870s – present), and indeed many external factors
are the same: livestock ranching, farming, free land, and the economic depressions. But the roles of the
railroad industry, the views from outside, and the subsequent modernization were different. The sense of
community that developed in the two places (Ismay and Ouray) was ultimately quite different.
Old Fences, New Neighbors is written by Peter Decker, an historian-turned-rancher and twenty-
year resident of Ouray County, Colorado. He moved there in the 1970s, and left in the 1990s. Like most
newcomers, he was not welcomed when he moved in, but he was different from other newcomers,
especially the ones despised by the old-timers, the “hobby ranchers” or members of the “second-home
recreational economy”, and so Peter Decker attained an “insider’s perspective”, despite his late arrival
(1974.) The original inhabitants of the Uncompahgre valleys of the San Juan Mountains were the Ute
Indians, and they were officially given the San Juan Mountainarea in the Treaty of 1868, but when the
white man discovered gold there, the Indians were removed and bought off with the Treaty of 1873. To
appease the tribe, they named the county Ouray, after the late Chief. The first families were the families
of miners, and with them came all the necessary supply shops, saloons, a sawmill, a bank, two hotels, a
brothel, and a schoolhouse, which was the community center. Ridgeway, in Ouray County, was a
prefabricated town made by the Rio GrandeSouthern railroad, a creation of railroad tycoon Otto Mears,
who was previously involved in compromising with the Indians. Livestock ranching and farming was
soon taken up in Ouray County, and barter and labor (mostly provided by children) were the currency of
the lifestyle that lasted about three generations. Water was the most important natural resource, and there
was the institutionalization of water to ensure its posterity. There was a water court and a system of water
rights. Water was the life-blood of farming and ranching and whatever land plots had seniority got first
The real conflict articulated in Old Fences, New Neighbors was between the newcomers and old-
timers. The old timers were the original homesteaders, the ranchers and farmers, who began as the
families of miners settled the region in the late nineteenth century. Hollywood romanticized the hard life
of the West and used Ouray County as a backdrop for films such as How the West Was Won, which made a
special place in the hearts of many Americans. In the 1920s, therapeutic business opened to bank on the
romance and the hot springs naturally occurring in Colorado, and spas such as the Radium Vapor Institute
opened to visitors. Campgrounds opened and wealthy people vacationed there, going on hikes in the
County, meanwhile old-timers and their families were sweating and bleeding, working the land. As
tourist visitors began to take up residence in Ouray County, property values skyrocketed, which made the
prospect of moving out enticing to the old-timers, many of whom would not budge. The schoolhouses
were the center of the communities, and the most heated clashes between these two groups centered
around what to teach the children. The old timers wanted a practical curriculum so they children’s time
would not be wasted, and the newcomers wanted philosophy and literature in the curriculum. By the mid-
1980s, the number of permanent residents equaled the number of seasonal residents. In the 1980s, vast
amounts of ranchland changed hands. At one point, the town of Ridgeway was made into something of a
Western-themed amusement park, Trail Town USA, which may people saw as a travesty. They even
employed “rental cowboys” to add “atmosphere.” The problem with the image they were playing on and
furthering was that it was false and even worse than misleading in its portrayal. By the 1990s, cattle
farming no longer defined the economy, and the agricultural economy switched to being a recreational
economy, from work ethic to play ethic. That is about the time our author moved to Nebraska, selling off
half his land. The tourist industry created a “servant economy” (pp. 180). The conclusion of the book
was that in the course of progress, values changed too, and the community is now “more interesting.”
Bad Landwas written by an English visitor named Jonathan Raban, and his account is filled with
snippets from various historical documents (newspapers, advertisements, poetry, railroad propaganda, and
novels) which yield various perspectives on the land and rural life. Eastern Montanawas harsh and
unforgiving of those who were duped into inhabiting it. The railroad was largely to blame, but the federal
government offered an enticing expansion of the original Homesteading Act as well. Albert Earling was
the president of the Milwaukee Road Railroad during its early expansion into Montana. In 1907 he
named a town Ismay after his daughters Isabella and May. There is a certain irony in this. Ismay is the
focus of Bad Lands. (pp. 22) Earling would have gone down with the Titanic did he not elbow past
women and children to survive. In light of this embarrassment a disk-jockey on national radio suggested
the name of the town be changed to Joe, honoring the football star Joe Montana, in order to attract
football fans to Ismay, which was now in ruins. They even instituted a holiday called Joe Montana Day,
wherein they had a parade and expected an audience of 4,000 visitors, but didn’t even clear 1,000, which
The Milwaukee Roadpamphlet refers to a book by Mr. Hardy Campbell that homesteaders should
check out. It was about the new method of Scientific Farming, which came to be called “dry-land
farming.” Campbell’s Soil Culture Manualsold for $2.50 and was an inspirational book, about the
romance of Man and Earth that emerges when one is obliged to conserve the limited natural resources. It
was about tilling and packing the soil so that it retains moisture better. Urbanites could practice new
methods of agriculture in their kitchens before they applied their knowledge in the field. The case
example of the successful application of this method was Ismay. This put Ismay on the map.
Campbellgave impressive figures of crop yields from his methods (as seen on page 38.) Campbellwas
influenced by both Jefferson and Roosevelt. Jeffersonheld “cultivators of the earth” to be the most
valuable people (pp. 49.) Roosevelt saw rural people was backward, as we saw in Old Fences, New
Neighbors, which of course they didn’t appreciate, but in Bad Land, the people were not in a position to
reject the New Deal assistance, however much it was designed to get farmers into debt, “to make farmers
and ranchers part of society,” via debt! Indeed, Roosevelt thought that self-sufficiency was politically
dangerous! As did other members of his Commission on County Life. (pp. 203-204) On page 38 of Bad
land we learn that there were many success stories of Campbell’s methods. Tons of stories began pouring
in about the success of dry farming. But Campbell’s findings were ignorant, prejudiced and filled with
“When Campbell wrote of how this system could enable readers to live “the ideal simple
life,” I think he was making a direct allusion to another inspirational work. Charles Wagner’s The
Simple Life was published in 1901 (in translation from the original French) and was an
immediate and spectacular bestseller. The success of Wagner’s book is a gauge of the powerful
tide of rural nostalgia that was washing through the industrial cities of Europe and America at the
turn of the century. There was a deep and troubled hankering for a life more neighborly, more
elemental, more “organic”; and the railroad pamphlets, Campbell’s Manual (along with several
other books on farming for beginners) and the Enlarged Homestead Act found a receptive
audience of people who were recklessly eager to believe in the idea of escaping the city to a new
and the frigid winter (minus 35 degrees reported on page 209), the community comes together, of
necessity, in order to battle what Raban calls “a common enemy,” which I take to be a powerful idea
(from page 219.) Just as in Old Fences, the community centered on the schoolhouse, in the time of need,
in Bad Land, in inclement weather. In Old Fences, in the Conclusion, on page 191, Peter Decker states:
“What we long for is not the simple, hard life, but the sense of community that has existed in Ridgeway
and other small towns from time to time.” Although Bad Lands seems more a book about the struggle of
an arid climate, I assure you it is centered on the human struggle in the human community, just like Old
Fences, New Neighbors, and this is the theme of these two books and lessons in history. Regardless of
whatever brings a community together, or holds it apart in dissension, is irrelevant, the relevance is the