Emails re: coerced immunization class between (parent) and DFCS supervisor Karan Albritton re: multiple notices

of the laws being violated and demonstration of duress:

From: (parent) Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:32 AM To: Karan Albritton <kkalbritton@dhr.state.ga.us> Karan, During (child)'s family meeting I failed to ask a question so I am would like to ask it now. Regarding the document styled as "State of Georgia Family Service Plan Family and Agency Data Fact Sheet Macon County", Case # 170 What would have happened if (parent) and I had not agreed to sign the aforementioned document? I ask this question because the document several times indicates that the plan is not court mandated. Please note that this inquiry is not a refusal to sign any documents. As I indicated on Monday 2/4/13, (parent) and I are under duress as indicated by the following evidence: 1. The document styled as 72 HOUR HEARING ORDER/PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Lisa C. Rambo on 2/8/13 indicates: "Any deviation will result in the child being taken into protective custody, and the non-complying parent will be subject to civil contempt." 2. Various department employees/contractors have been documented expressing to us (parent)'s that (child) will be taken from us if we fail to comply with protective orders. 3. Given that (child) was harmed(hospital ID bracelet profoundly blistered and girded (child)'s left wrist indicating neglect on the part of the foster parents or DFCS/CPS while outside of his parent's custody. Ergo, I have the the reasonable expectation that if we(child's parents) do not comply with court orders then (child) may be harmed or worse while in foster care if he is taken from us again. So as to be certain that all interested parties to this instant matter are aware: (parent) and (parent) are not freely participating in the ongoing family plan case# 17085129 and the protective orders as expressed within the document styled as "72 HOUR HEARING ORDER / PROTECTIVE ORDER" CASE #094-. (parent) and (parent)are, in fact, participating in the aforementioned cases under the demonstrated threat(s) that our child will be taken from us and possibly harmed as a result of foster care/DFCS/CPS neglect. (parent) and I are participating in this matter so as to avoid any harm to (child) that may result from neglect suffered while in foster care, DFCS, or CPS custody/care. The well being of our three children is a paramount priority to us and has always been of paramount priority. Our children are absolutely the most essential part of our lives. Please understand that the purpose of this letter is to have my inquiry answered, to document important safety concerns, and to maintain open and honest two-way communications with those involved in this instant matter. Thank you, (parent)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------From: (parent) Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 2:53 PM To: Karan Albritton <kkalbritton@dhr.state.ga.us> Kindly greetings to Karan, et alia, The purpose of this letter is that of lawful notice of actual and impending natural rights violations. Please forward to all interested parties post haste. Our faith (and our love for our children) requires us to well provide for the health and general well-being of our children. (parent) and I have been told by numerous medical doctors that the immunization procedure does, in fact, causes the deaths of a certain number of children each year. We are also told by medical doctors that an even greater number of children are brain damaged and immune-compromised as a direct result of being "immunized". Given the aforementioned, we parents are absolutely unauthorized by god's law(paramount law) as well as the fundamental / organic law to engage in the medical procedure known as vaccination / immunization. Gods law is evidenced within the bible(old and new testament) while organic law includes the following: Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776 the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 and the Constitution of September 17, 1791

Given the established lawful authority above and working within the confines of it, I am unable to see any lawful authorization that would enable the corporation styled as, "DFCS / CPS" and its employees to kidnap my son vi et armis from our (parents) possession. In lawful fact, the only "official" authorized, by law, to attend to any suspected wrongdoing regarding this instant matter would have been the sheriff. Furthermore, I am unable to see(in law) this abomination styled as "IN THE JUVENILE COURT OF MACON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA". Corporate Judge Lisa Rambo,corporate attorney James W. Hurt, and any other corporate employee do not have the lawful authority to compel my wife and I to "successfully complete immunization classes" firstly and to violate our natural rights secondly. From what source comes your asserted authority to be willfully(well evidenced and in the record) violative of our God given and natural rights? Are you under the idea that you are authorized by mere corporate statutes, aka corporate policy, aka evidence of the law? If so, then do please notice: the paramount, fundamental, organic law is well antecedent to what you claim as your pretended authority. Organic law provides no authority for kidnapping, child neglect(Flint's left wrist while in "state" custody), coercion of parents via threatening to steal their child, coercion of parents to submit to unlawful ideologies(immunization class), the forced and deliberate poisoning of our child by way of unlawful "immunization", the threat that our other children will be stolen, the presumption of parens patriae, and other criminal offenses. Perhaps it has been indicated that we have consented to all of this malarkey? Not exactly. It is well established precept of law that no corporation (or officer or employee thereof) possesses legitimate (governmental) coercive authority over any living man or woman without his or her actual or implied Consent, typically evidenced by or through some form of contract/agreement bearing ones unqualified (unrestricted) signature. In other words, the only "authority" that the corporation styled as "IN THE JUVENILE COURT OF MACON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA" may have or claim to have (over my person or property) comes from me. Evidence has been well shown and well documented to well substantiate the fact that (parent) and I proceed forthwith under verifiable duress insofar as our signatures and our participation in the so-called "court orders". Duress in an element of fraud. As you know or should know, fraud vitiates all agreements, contracts, etc . Again, (parent) and I cooperate vi et armis.

The next verifiable violation of our natural and god given rights will occur on February 21st, 2013 when (parent) and I are coerced to "successfully" complete immunization classes. Said "class" is akin to forcing an orthodox Jew to "successfully complete a swine butchering and nutritional educational seminar". What the corporate court asserts is that my faith is not legitimate and that I should change my mind. To said unlawful court I would politely inquire, "Upon what authority do you question my faith?". Said court sits squarely and firmly within the organic realms of law on this point. Said court and its

employees are wholly without authority to be questioning my faith and the free exercise thereof. It should be noted that I have discussed most of these points with Joe Wilkins...a good man if ever I met one to be sure. It is quite possible that Lisa Rambo is completely unaware of our position made clear in this document. I am requesting that all of these verifiable facts contained herein and above be conveyed to Lisa Rambo post haste. The violation of one's natural and god given rights is no laughing matter and any judge, corporate or lawful, knows or should know this to be true. Furthermore, if Lisa Rambo is for some reason not made awares of the contents of this letter then full liability insofar as violating our rights will fall upon the employees interacting with me, (parent), and (child) thus far. I would also suggest upon conveying this letter to Judge Rambo you(Karan) get documented proof that you have done so for obvious liability reasons. Lastly, it is my belief that those corporate employees interacting with me. (parent), and (child) are not malevolent nor intend us any harm. My faith does not allow me to maintain malice toward others. All of you are somebody's child and all of you are the creator's children thus all deserving of respect and love. I am politely asking you to not continue to violate our god given rights as humans and parents lest you willfully continue to be violative of our rights thus lawfully liable for doing so in this instant matter. Respectfully, friendly, and peaceful, non-assumpsit per idem sonans persona ficta (parent)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------From: (parent) To: Karan Albritton <kkalbritton@dhr.state.ga.us> Karan,

Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:05 AM

I am looking for the affidavit that authorized (child)'s "order for shelter care". According to Renee at the Juvenile Court for Macon county, 229-928-4569, DFCS has this sworn testimony. Do you know the whereabouts of said affidavit? If so, then I will need a copy of it. All lawful court orders must have an affidavit. In Flint's case the doctor would have signed said affidavit and provided it to the judge. Please help me find this document, (parent)

From: (parent)

Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 10:58 AM

To: Karan Albritton <kkalbritton@dhr.state.ga.us> Karan, I have not heard back from you regarding the affidavit that should be annexed to the order for shelter care. Said affidavit, if it exists, should be in possession of the court clerk. According to the recorder's office employee, Renee, there is no oath or affirmation on file justifying the order for shelter care. All lawful judicial process must conform to the law which in this case is governed by the 4th amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. So what we are attempting to determine, currently, is the whereabouts of the lawfully required oath or affirmation in support of probable cause which would enable a lawful judge to create a lawful court order or in this case an "order for shelter care". In (child)'s case, a sworn statement regarding the "complaint" is lawfully required. Said sworn statement, for example, could be in the form of Dr. Cartie's written complaint to DFCS by way of affidavit. Please let me know that you have received this message. Respectfully, (parent)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Karan Albritton <kkalbritton@dhr.state.ga.us> To: (parent) Mr. (parent),

Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:06 PM

I have received your email but I cannot answer legal questions. I have sent this to our attorney. Karan K. Albritton Social Services Supervisor Macon / Schley County DFCS 478-472-3721 - Macon Co. 478-472-3732 - fax 229-937-2591 - Schley Co. 229-937-5641 - fax kkalbritton@dhr.state.ga.us

Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:25 PM From: (parent) To: Karan Albritton <kkalbritton@dhr.state.ga.us>

OK. Please tell me who made the complaint to dfcs regarding flint's medical well being at JMS hospital in Augusta, ga on December 5, 2012. Thank you, (parent)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Karan Albritton <kkalbritton@dhr.state.ga.us> From: (parent) To: Karan Albritton <kkalbritton@dhr.state.ga.us> Karan,

Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:32 PM

I am respectfully requesting copies of any/ all article 6 fidelity oaths for Lisa Rambo and any attorney involved in flint cross's case. I will be happy to pay for copying expenses involved. Thank you, (parent)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------From: (parent) To: Karan Albritton <kkalbritton@dhr.state.ga.us> Karan, This purpose of this email is to further document the clear violation of my family's rights some of which are expressed in the organic laws of Georgia. This morning Cynthia Martin, a social services case manager employed by the corporation styled as "MACON / SCHLEY COUNTY DFCS", called me at my home. Cynthia asked me, "I was just calling to see if you all were coming to the education classes tomorrow." (parent), "Considering we are being forced to attend these classes under threat we are going to be there as earlier stated." Cynthia, 'OK. I was trying to make sure before the lady drove down." (parent), "We definitely do not want to do this and have told Karan Albritton that this is against our faith to be involved in this and we have requested that information be sent to the judge Lisa Rambo. They are going to go ahead and violate our rights tomorrow." Cynthia, "I will follow this up with her (Karan) and if there is anything different then I will call you back." " The Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:17 PM

meeting will be at 1:30pm(Feb 21, 2013) at the Macon county health department in Oglethorpe."

(parent) "Please follow up with Karan because she has been notified that this is against our faith, against our beliefs and it is certainly a violation of our rights. But we are going to cooperate because judge Rambo has directly threatened to take our child if we do not." Cynthia, "ok". The law of Georgia expresses the following rights guaranteed to not be infringed upon by a judge or anyone presuming to be lawfully authorized by the government: Paragraph III. Freedom of conscience. Each person has the natural and inalienable right to worship God, each according to the dictates of that person's own conscience; and no human authority should, in any case, control or interfere with such right of conscience. Respectfully, (parent) and family -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Karan Albritton <kkalbritton@dhr.state.ga.us> Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:47 PM To: (parent) Mr. (parent) Our agency is under the court order to provide this service to you and your wife and that is what we are doing. I did forward the email as you requested to Judge Rambo when you sent it. I will also be at the class tomorrow. Karan K. Albritton Social Services Supervisor Macon / Schley County DFCS 478-472-3721 - Macon Co. 478-472-3732 - fax 229-937-2591 - Schley Co. 229-937-5641 - fax kkalbritton@dhr.state.ga.us

From: (parent) To: Karan Albritton <kkalbritton@dhr.state.ga.us>

Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:18 PM

Karan, Please consider that your "agency" and the individual human beings which animate said agency are not lawfully authorized to infringe upon the natural and god-given rights we have thus discussed. Please understand that you and others have been lawfully noticed of these lawful facts. You can be held liable for intentionally violating our rights as has been documented. I will also point out that the attorneys you work with are most probably not the best resources insofar as organic law issues are concerned. Said attorneys are corporate / statutory attorneys. Statutory attorneys have little to no knowledge regarding the very real lawful consequences that you may be facing given the evidence I have compiled. I am very concerned that you are under the idea that you may have no personal immunity insofar as being a party to violating our rights. If you are doing your job and that job is government (or in this case pretended government in nature) in nature and you are found to have intentionally violated my rights then you will be stripped of any official immunity. Reason being that government agencies / agents are simply not authorized by law to violate our rights. Such language is found through out the Georgia code. There is a multitude of higher court decisions affirming that which I have been conveying. Not one single "government" human being involved in the (child) case is authorized by fundamental / organic law to have done that which they have done. I feel that I have given you all the information you need to make the very best decision regarding the demonstrably criminal engagement of our family. Consider that had there been any respect for the welfare and rights of my family then this case would have been closed by now given the evidence thus provided to all involved. We are not under the illusion that Lisa Rambo has the best intentions for (child), my other children, or their parents. Lisa chooses to proceed against us when her better option is to leave us alone. Please refer to commandment 10. Please stop breaking this law. My children are not your children or Lisa Rambo's children or the state's children. We shall continue to cooperate with the so called protective orders vi et armis, Respectfully, friendly, (parent)

From: (parent)

To: Karan Albritton <kkalbritton@dhr.state.ga.us> Karan,

Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:19 PM

There is another way to prevent our natural rights violation scheduled tomorrow at 1:30pm: You may express to me (parent) or Lisa Rambo may express to me in writing that the so-called "requirement" to attend immunization education is purely and unequivocally optional. Furthermore, if (parent) and (parent) choose to not attend said immunization class then there will be no negative consequences legal or otherwise for (parent), (parent), (child), and the rest of their family.

If (parent) and I are made to understand that we are not being coerced by the well demonstrated threat to kidnap and possibly harm (child) then we will opt to not attend said immunization education. However, if we do not get a response to this email or are told that our attendance is mandatory it be will understood that we will attend the immunization class under absolute threat to our family therefore under abject duress. Respectful, friendly, peaceful, (parent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Confirmation of immunization appointment and actual notice

From: (parent) Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:33 AM To: Karan Albritton <kkalbritton@dhr.state.ga.us> Karan, This email is to confirm our meeting regarding immunization education at 1:30 pm today at the Macon county health department. Attached is an actual notice regarding this event. Sharon and I will attend said meeting at 1:30pm today. Respectfully, peaceful, (parent)

cdc lawful notice pdf.pdf 95K

From: (parent) To: Karan Albritton <kkalbritton@dhr.state.ga.us> Karan,

Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:09 PM

Provide me the emails for both Mr. Eidison and Mrs. Lisa(Aliscia) Coogle Rambo. I will personally ask them to provide the lawfully required oath or affirmation to support the action of seizing my son. Again, all participation with DFCS, juvenile court, and its employees / officials is occurring at all times, ab initio, under absolute duress as far as we are concerned. Thank you,

(parent) (parent)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Notice of the law regarding (child)

From: (parent) To: juvclerk054@gmail.com Cc: Karan Albritton <kkalbritton@dhr.state.ga.us> Greetings Mrs. Alicia (Lisa) Rambo, You are hereby noticed of the following laws: The 9th commandment at Exodus 20:16: You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor. The organic law of the republic of Georgia: Paragraph XIII. Searches, seizures, and warrants. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated; and no warrant shall issue except upon probable cause supported by oath or affirmation particularly describing the place or places to be searched and the persons or things to be seized. Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 11:30 AM

The organic law of the United States of America: Amendment IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. There be an order for shelter care dated 12/5/ 2012 with the authorizing signature of Lisa C. Rambo. Said order, by

law, must be based upon probable cause and must be supported by oath or affirmation. In fact, an inquiry as to the whereabouts of an oath or affirmation, as required by law, was made to a DFCS supervisor on 2/12/2013 and at other times. The following was the answer given, "I am sorry but we are not allowed to reveal reporter information. All reports made to DFCS are confidential." You are hereby commanded to immediately produce the oath or affirmation in support of the seizure, at gun point, of (child) from his parents on or around 8PM December 5th, 2012. Said lawfully required document must have been created and dated on December 5th, 2012. If said oath or affirmation does not exist then what specific Article, Section and Clause of our laws referenced above gives you or anyone else the authority to overrule God's Law and their clear manifestation within our organic law evidenced at Paragraph XIII and Amendment IV? You are authorized to respond to this electronic mail by way of electronic mail regarding this instant matter. Respectfully, (parent) (parent)