LOC

Prior question on procedural level, impact to compettiive equitiy. Use and abuse of fiat, no access to critic. Impact calculous proves abuse story 2.Fiat means no access to K or DA rounds, abuse in debate round.

MGC

MOC

LOR

PMR

LOC

MGC

MOC

A) specifiy judging voting

We meet, rulings normal means

Specify which judges vote for affirmative case, no meet. Key to limits to identifying ground. Cant pic out of judges, specifity is needed for this.

C) Ground:

Ospec worse

1.Can pic out of judges

A. Pic ground solves back, a. kill ground, prep time is important for the LOC. skewed advantages to judges LOC is most important choosed. Crushes speech unique in this predictability situation

D) erre out of negative strategy, LOC is only way to grant strategies

not overspecification and rooted in literature basis, with the critic of decisions. A2 predictability: 1.GROUnd checks this back, even if you crush predictability you would get ground with new counterplan. Cant get ofense without it. Best internal link to limite debate. More limiting checks this back and run politics link to solve back for the affirmative. Aff explosion of ground is worse than negative implosion of ground.

2. MG offense is bad No limits, any nuimber of combination of judges and advantages

3.Limits most is best 4. Aff gets to challenge framework, and then negative needs to win

POIs always check

a.can choose to not answer this question, No standards for why this is true, no compete with competitng interpretations which forces you to look at entire standards debate. Ground is true, cant pic out of anything under aff interpretation and no access to DA

Voting issue for competing interpretation

Reasonability, win clear in round abuse

Concede that you erre negative on theory, LOC is the most important speech. MOC arguments are impact turned by the PMR No offense to limits answered better.

Aff chooses the framwork, and extrapolate use of fiat to spike out of critic. No counter interpretation or we meet with normal means 2.Outwigh on interpretation, force you to look at every specific standards. Fiat proves abuse:! 1.Reason why they dont access to critic. Specify, get pic ground and uniqueness ground.

2.Guaruntees links to advnatages and then negative has to guess what are the uniqueness and links to DAs Prior question to affirmative 1.Sets framework and thesis for the debate round.

LOR

PMR

Normal means is predictable ground, literature allows negative to choose. Infinite ground with overspecifiying, negative always loses. Can choose with the aff framework with the infinite ground, aff would choose their DA, CP and ruling and then affirmative would chose the best one jacking them from the best arguments negative would walys lose

1.Ground based, meaning that this is the only predictable ground. Negative should be able to choose which judges do what with literature. 2. No limits, infinite combination of judges. lITERATURE means that Negative always gets negative gets access to access to CP and DA their arguments with this. ground with this.

Explode limits with affirmative specifiyin,g infinite regression offense with ground and limits arguments CP ground is still eliminated when aff chooses

3. Negative gets fiat in this interpretaion, meaning negative interp is stupid.

Give specific in round abuse, like voting on a potential DA Negative still gets fiat in both interpretation. No reason why this argument matters.

PMC
Plan: US Supreme Court rule inf avor of rodney gant in gant v arizona Ruling is normal means and ruled on grounds of 4th ammendment Background: 1.Issue is of credible threat for cops to search your cars, privacy is not exiplicit meaning that there is nothing preventing searches

LOC

MGC

ADV: A) 4th amendment is battled now, right to privacy is always battled B) abandon rights of privacy is a tipping point where it is abandonedd Racism exists because of state, uniqueness cuts in direction of the affirmative, make state do less step in right direction

C) Ruling in favor of this means that violent and credible threats is eliminated D) Justifies racial profiling of individuals which means that this is only way that people can do racial profililing and set legal precident E) Racism causes dehumanizations, put someone as the other. Excludes an entire group based on how they are born over race 2.Leads to property and structural dehumanization, no agency or society

F) creates a teleological precedent where people cant be arbitrarily killed, this is a slippery slope to killing them G) Privacy is the mandatory starting point to tyranny and dictatership and normalizes violence and no value to life H) Solvency: Guaruntee right to privacy and mandates right of privacy above all else before someone's right to person.

No uniquenss without a pragmatic step Solvency of the case, only way to solve racism without state solvency and aciton.

Pragmatism is only way to stolve

MOC

LOR

PMR

LOC

MGC
Fiat allows education, understand how it acts. B.better policy makers later on C.better revolutionaries, udnerstanding workings of the state and see cracks and fissuers. Movement becomes corrupted without state, no knoweldge of action. Fiat allows roleplaying, representative democracy No eliminate rep systems, fiat is best way to change.

MOC

Framework:

Cross apply, state is key in squo, genocide is inevitable 1.Debate should be open to without the state. Aff solves a a liberatory narratives better scenario 1.Endorsement grants legitimacy meaning that It is a prior question 2.Bad method leads to bad policy, Iraq proves 3.Symbolism frames political violence, 9/11 proves 4.Ontology is a prior question, cant seprate plan from ontological perspective

Links: 1.Aff imagines the existence of the big other Imagine state as a good actor, utilization of fiat meaning that we pretend to be the supreme court

2.Supreme court is bad, exclusive legalistic language that excludes people. 3.Imagine value to life only from the lens of the state and supreme court Without state, coercion is far worse. Biggest weapons detirmines who does what

4. legal system is a facist state power, invisible and more exclusive key manifistation of state power Only system with diplomacy, and decides state norms stop war 5.Aff assumes that the state is the only thing that can act to solve racism, demobalizes people because we assume that the state has dealth with the problem because the supreme court has already solved it

Fiat is good, debate is an activity to discuss utility of government to solve movements. Ruling of decision allows success point allows new micrpolitics No movement withoiut state movement, no solvency without the state of the affirmative

Impacts: 1.Agency to paternal figureheads which guts our agency, we need to recognize that we have agency to frame external Fiat distance self from philosophies. Triggers argument, totalizing view of passivity. the state 2.20th century atrocitiy justified by biopolitical imagination and iodea of an unhuman iother to jsutify violence and realism, creation of an enemy that we cant see but still endlessly attack

State is inevtibale, only prevent weapons is state. State has launch codes only learn how to stop state without it

3. Justify and create real violence, mobalize populations for violence and extirmination, 360 bombs dropped in bagdad in an hour because we dont challnege power. 4. neg frameowrk only for value to life, do not privlage ethical systems that divest agency 5. Ecocide is inevitable, pursuit of resources. Supremem court regulates resources, demobalizes us from checking caopitalsim

State allows specalization, people do different things over hunter gathering. Allows value to life.

Govenrment solve capitalism stop ecodestruction and technology

6. Biodiversity is necessary for solving extinction 7. Demarcates the bounderies of our Free speech zones is GOP existnece, regulation of free have militia outside doors speech in zones. stop any speech 8. Big other preserves itself through this, physical restraint on our agency

Alt: Vote Negative to imagine the big other does not exist Solve:

Illegitimte ground, uniquness for critical argument. Articifial uniqueness and arbitary inflation of impact arguments

1.Requires voting negative, aff assumes supreme court is a good actor. Severence, moots 1nc the most important speech. 2.Signifies a key political stance and this privaleges idea through the ballot.

3.Affirmation of critic itself, metaforic condensation rearangment, things we say and way that we say them have transformative value. 4.Demistify big other because we imagine the big other does not exist.

LOR

PMR

LOC

MGC
State is inevitabel: A. states break down and reofrm b. specalize create governemnt systems c.Survive, people rely on government and others to survive state for efficiency is inevitable Good: A.keep captialism from killing people through reuglation B. exploitation is inevitalbe witohut state, makes indentured servants are illegal C. strong destroy week in aff framework, US military rolls over world, no more state Solve Eco: 1.Build tech to decrease C02, only way to do it is state power Causes extinction, deserts with temp rises

MOC

LOR

PMR

LOC

MGC

MOC

LOR

PMR

LOC

MGC

MOC

LOR

PMR

1AC
i/l suck ass impacts need terminalization explain why drug plan bad

1NC

2AC

2NC