Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Table of Content
Content
1. Introduction 1.1 Historical background of mergers and acquisitions 1.2 Aims and objectives of the study 1.3 Hypothesis of the research 1.4 Structure of the research 2. Literature Review 2.1 Definitions 2.2 Motives for engaging in mergers and acquisitions 2.3 The Effects of the Motives: Post Mergers and Acquisitions Performance 3. Methodology 3.1 Research Problem 3.2 Research Design 3.3 Data Collection 3.4 Data Analysis 4. Limitations of the study 5. Gantt chart 6. Conclusion References 7 7-8 8 8 9 9 9 10 4 5 5-6 3 3 3 4
Page
1. Introduction
1.1 Historical Development of Mergers and Acquisitions
A merger or acquisition happens when two or more companies join together, often to share costs, increase efficiency or gain market power. Mergers and acquisitions, also referred to as M&As, is also a tool for expanding ones business or get around different laws or regulations such as tax laws or monopoly regulations (Ross, Westerfield & Jaffe,2002). Mergers and acquisitions are often regarded as a new financial phenomenon but they have since eons played an important role in the corporate restructuring of a number of leading companies over the world. Indeed from the perspective of historical development of mergers and acquisitions, they seem to pursue a historic pattern with several boom periods. In the United States, the first merger wave took place between 1890 and 1904 while the second started off at the end of World War I and continued through 1920s. Indeed, the latter part of World War II witnessed the commencement of the third merger wave and continues to the present. Despite being characterised by the fluctuations in share prices, each period of boom had some differences in payment methods and types of firms that merged or acquired (Brealey et al., 2006).
2. Literature Review
3. Research Methodology
5. Conclusion
2. Literature Review
2.1 Definition
Mergers and acquisitions are frequently being influenced by various financial and strategic objectives. Indeed, it is a situation whereby two organizations with often different corporate personalities, cultures and value systems are brought together (Sudarsanam, 2003). The terms merger and acquisition mutually mean a corporate grouping of two separate business organisations to form one company and they are often used synonymously in practice (Chiplin & Wright, 1987), but there are slightly different meanings between them. Academics pointed out a few differences to distinguish whether a specific activity is classified as a merger or an acquisition. A merger activity usually occurs when two separate firms which have similar size agree to form a new single company. Both firms come together to form a third entity and the owners of the combining firms remain joint owners of the new organisation (Sudarsanam, 1995). Such a motion is often referred as a merger of equals (www.investopedia.com). A typical example of a major merger is the merger between AOL and Time Warner in 2000. In contrast, in the case of an acquisition, one company is purchased by another one and then no new company is formed subsequently. It is an act of acquiring effective control over the assets or management of a company by another without any combination of businesses or organizations. This may involve the purchase of another firms assets or stock (Donald M. DePamphilis, 2008). A major acquisition that took place is that of Manulife Financial Corporation's acquisition of John Hancock Financial Services Inc in 2004 (www.investopedia.com).
2.3 The Effects of the Motives: Post Mergers and Acquisitions Performance
It is essential to assess the effectiveness or consequences of the various motives which force managers to engage in mergers and acquisitions. This can be established by analysing the post merger and acquisition performance for acquirers and targets. According to Bruner (2002), there exist four approaches to analyse post merger and acquisition performance namely: event studies, accounting studies, clinical studies and survey of executives. 1) Event Studies Event studies measure the abnormal returns pertaining to shareholders during the period surrounding the pronouncement of the merger. This abnormal is fundamentally the difference between the raw returns which is
simply the change in share prices and a benchmark index which may be calculated by using CAPM or S&P 500, among other indices (Krishanmurti and Vishwanath, 2008). 2) Accounting Studies Under this method, the study of financial statements and ratios to compare the pre and post merger financial performance of the acquiring company is involved. Various ratios such as return on equity or assets, EPS, liquidity among others are considered. It is also used to analyse whether the acquirers outperformed the non acquirers (Gaughan, 2007), 3) Executive Surveys It is a primary source of information collection whereby managers are asked about the success or otherwise of the merger. Views are generalized from the response of managers on the standardized questionnaires presented to them (Bruner, 2004). 4) Clinical Studies A clinical study is an inductive form of research whereby researchers often induce new insights (Bruner, 2004). The purpose of clinical studies is to fill in the gaps left by the study of the stock returns and accounting performances (Jensen, 1986). Indeed, one case or a small sample is analysed in depth and insights are derived from field interviews with executives and knowledgeable observers.
3. Methodology
I will conduct the entire research in the field of mergers and acquisitions. The study will be guided by five basic attributes of any research: Firstly, the research will be problem solving and systematic. Secondly, others will easily understand the main subject matter since it will have a logic and flow. The study will be based on facts to facilitate decision making and drawing conclusions from data collected. The smaller sample area can be investigated and can be generalized to a larger set of population, that is, it will be reductive. Lastly, it will be replicable to allow others to test it or carry our further analysis.
Merger 1- Insurance Sector The first case which will be studied is the merger of two listed insurance companies, namely La Prudence (Mauricienne) Assurances Lte and the Mauritius Union Assurance Company Limited to form the Mauritius Union Group. Merger 2 Oil and Gas Sector Secondly, the takeover of Shell Mauritius Limited by Vitol Group and Helios Investment Partners will be considered.
2) Exploratory Research Design This will be conducted in a limited format. I will try to conduct an in-depth interview with some of the top executives of the above mentioned companies. The main objective of conducting in-depth interview is to have a better overview on the way the entire merger and acquisition was undertaken, the synergies involved as well as the strategy in mind by the acquiring firm. However, the limitation is that only companies where top executive appointment can be sought will be considered.
2013
Nov
1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5
Sept
Oct
1 0
Jan
Feb
Mar
1 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
6. Conclusion
In a nutshell, the effect of mergers on the operating performance and shareholder value of two acquiring firms will be analysed. Two main methods of data collection and different research design will be used. At the end of the study, conclusion will be drawn as to whether theories on mergers and acquisitions hold in the Mauritian context or not.
10
References
1. Bakker, H.J.C., Helmink, J.W.A., (2004), Successfully Integrating Two Businesses, Gower Publishing Limited, Hampshire. 2. Brealey, RA, Myers, SC & Allen, F 2006, Corporate Finance, 8th edition, McGraw-Hill Irwin 3. Bruner, R.F., (2004), Applied Mergers & Acquisitions, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New Jersey. 4. Chiplin, B & Wright, M 1987, The logic of mergers: the competitive market in corporate control in theory and practice, Institute of Economic Affairs, London. 5. Gaughan, P.A., (2005), Mergers, Acquisitions and Corporate Restructuring. 4th ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey. 6. Griffiths, A., Wall, S., (2007), Applied Economics, 11th ed, Pearson Education Limited, England. 7. Jensen, M.C., (1986), Agency Costs of free cashflow, Corporate Finance and Takeovers, The American Economic Review, vol. 76(2), pp. 323-329 8. Kaushal, V.K., (1995), Corporate Takeovers in India, Sarup & Sons, New Delhi. 9. Kumar, R., (2005), Research methodology: A Step by Step Guide for Beginners, 2nd ed, Sage Publication Ltd., (s.1.). 10. Levy, H & Sarnat, M 1970, Diversification, Portfolio Analysis and the Uneasy Case for Conglomerate Mergers, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 795-802 11. Pearso, B., (1999), Successful Acquisitions of Unquoted Companies: A Practical Guide, 4th ed, University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 12. Ross, S.A. Westerfield, R.W., Jaffe, J., (2004), Corporate Finance, Tata McGraw- Hill, New Delhi 13. Sloman, J., (2006), Economics, 6th ed, Pearson Education Limited, England Websites www.investopedia.com www.wikipedia.com
11