Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Alliance for Lobbying Transparency briefing note | February 2012 Tamasin@spinwatch.org | 07973 424 015
The government has promised to make lobbying transparent. But its current plans to open up the influence industry are a sham.
The problem with lobbying
Anyone can lobby government its what we do when we voice our concerns to our MP. But this doesnt make us all lobbyists. Lobbyists are people who are paid to influence government decisions. Its big business in the UK, where the lobbying industry is worth 2billion. Most of the money is spent by large corporations, who court politicians and officials and persuade them to delays laws and regulations or award them government business, all to benefit their bottom line and often against the public interest. New transparency rules would allow us to see the countless ways our lives are shaped by lobbyists. Wed see the size of the private healthcare lobby pushing for the current NHS reforms; who is persuading the government against reform of the banks; and which firms want to get their hands on greenbelt land.
We have three main concerns with the governments current plans: 1. The definition of who a lobbyist is is too narrow and excludes most of the industry 2. The plans will only require lobbyists to register who they are, but nothing on their interaction with government, i.e. which officials they are lobbying, and what they are seeking to influence 3. The register must be publicly funded so that alleged improprieties can be properly investigated
and why
! There is no difference between the activities of a lobbyist working in-house for an organisation and an agency lobbyist. In-house lobbyists make up the vast majority of the lobbying industry; industry figures show that they outnumber agency lobbyists by 4:1. The figures in the consultation, which put the ratio at fewer than 1:2 are wrong. The current plans would exclude roughly 2,500-3,000 lobbyists, in organisations from Tesco to Barclays, CBI to Greenpeace. Law firms, management consultants, accountancy firms and think tanks also lobby for third parties and must be included. There is no evidence from registers overseas that such a system deters people from putting their views to government.
For a more detailed definition, and a fuller list of exemptions, see ALTs Essential Provisions for a Statutory Register document at www.lobbyingtransparency.org
and why
The ultimate purpose of a lobbying register is to increase government accountability by allowing the public to see lobbyists dealings with officials. Therefore, it must include details of which public officials are being lobbied and what issues they are being lobbied on. Here the consultation is misleading: its accompanying Impact Assessment recognises that the registers purpose is to make public who is lobbying and on what issues. This has been omitted from the Consultation Paper itself, which changes the registers purpose to making public who is lobbying and for whom. It is important to be able to see how much money is being invested in lobbying: wed know the spending gap between, for example, business and civil society groups, or multi-nationals and non-profits lobbying for government contracts. Lobbying is a tactical investment for business: US figures suggest that for every dollar spent on lobbying a company can expect $100 return.
Who should run the register, how should it be funded, and how should it be policed?
We agree with the government that the register should be run by an independent body. But we think it must be publicly funded, not financed by lobbyists, as the government proposes. We believe the Electoral Commission would be an ideal candidate to run the register as it already oversees the party funding registers and is trusted by the public. The lobbying register could be added to its remit, along with sufficient public funds to operate, monitor and enforce the new rules. This would avoid the need to create and fund a separate body. We also agree with the government that penalties for failure to comply with the new rules should include fines, and the possibility of criminal prosecution for more serious offences, like knowingly and corruptly failing to comply. !
and why
Lobbying is an essential part of a healthy democracy when it is open to public scrutiny. There must be no financial barrier to anyone wanting to lobby in a transparent way. A lobbying register could pay for itself by improving government accountability. Public money can be misspent as a consequence of well-funded lobbying. As David Cameron says: Government contracts worth hundreds of billions of pounds are potentially at stake. New rules are only as good as the monitoring and enforcement that goes with them. The body running the register must be given sufficient funds to adequately monitor its accuracy and enforce sanctions.
TAKE ACTION
Tell the government that their current plans will not expose professional lobbying to much-needed public scrutiny. They want to know your views on: 1. Who should be included in the register? and how should lobbyists be defined? 2. What information should be included? and should it include how much is spent? 3. How often should it be updated? 4. Who should run the register? 5. How should it be funded? 6. What sanctions should apply? Please email your response to: registerlobbyists@cabinet-office.gsi.gov.uk Or send them to: Statutory Register of Lobbyists Area 4/S1, 1 Horse Guards Road London, SW1A 2HQ Deadline for submissions is 13 April 2012 The governments consultation paper: Introducing a Statutory Register of Lobbyists can be downloaded at: www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/constitutionalreform
2012.
Year
1.
Quarter
Unlock Democracy...
Organisation (commercial) Organisation (not-for-profit) Lobbying Firm Self Employed Individual Coalition
Address: 6-9 Cynthia Street ............... London .. Post Code: N1 9JF... Contact name: Peter Facey (Director) Tel: 020 7278 4443 ID: email: info@unlockdemocracy.org.uk
Political and constitutional reform issues, including: introduction of a statutory register of lobbyists; House of 2. Lobbying details Lords reform;activity individual elector registration; and party funding
! Government departments and agencies lobbied:
Nick Clegg, DPM; Mark Harper, Minister for Political and Constitutional Reform; Peter Lee (CO)
! Issue(s) lobbied on:
Client income:
Information to be provided by third party lobbyist named above as registrant: good faith estimate, to the nearest 1000, of all lobbying related income from the client in this quarter.
Lobbying expenses:
Good faith estimate of expenses relating to lobbying activities undertaken by the registrant for this quarter.
:..... 4
: 21,600.....