Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 10

option level strongly agree agree neutral disagree strongly disagree option level yes no

No of respondent 37 63 0 0 0 No of respondent 100 0

#VALUE! 37 63 0 0 0

No of respond
70 60 60100 50 50 37 40 80 37 50 40 30 60 30 37 40 40 20 20 10 30 20 10 0 0 0 strongly agree neutral 20 strongly yes agree agree agree 10 0 63 63 100

No of respondent
70
60

63

50 40 30 20 10 0 strongly agree agree neutral disagree strongly disagree 37

No of respondent 35

Option level
0

No of respondent
0 0

2002 government policy Foreign equity policy Minimum risk Fuel policy Minimum investment

Percentag e of 30 responde 25 nt 35 21 20 30 21 31 12 16 20
25 15 20 10 15 5 10
0 5

31 12 16 20

No of respond

No of respond
120
100

100
80

60 40

option level yes no

No of respondent 100 0

20 0 yes

No of respond
35
30

31
21

25 20 15

option level

No of respondent

10

2002 government policy Foreign equity policy Minimum risk Fuel policy Minimum investment

21 31 12 16 20

5 0 2002 government policy 70 61 60


50

Foreign equity policy

Minimum

40 30

37

option level

No of respondent

20

Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree

61 37 1 1 0

10
0

0 option level Strongly agree Agree

No of respond
60 51 49

60 50 40 30
20

51

49

10 0

option level

No of respondent

Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree

51 49 0 0 0

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

No of respond
60 50
40

52

48

option level

No of respondent

30

Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree

52 48 0 0 0

20
10

0 Strongly agree Agree Neutral

No of respond
60

50 40 30

48 42

30 20

option level

No of respondent

10

Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree

42 48 0 0 0

0
35 30 25 20 15 10

Strongly agree 33

Agree

No of respond Neutral

20

option level

No of respondent

Inflation machine cost quality focused competitive advantage

33 20 27 20

Inflation

machine cost

No of respond
35
30

31

25 20 15

20

option level

No of respondent

10

Production time Production capacity Handling Scrap minimum Input feeding

20 31 24 12 13

0 Production Production time capacity 66

Handling No of respond

70 60 50 40 30

34

Option level Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree

No of respondent 66 34 0 0 0

20 10 0 Strongly agree Agree Neutral

No of respond
70 60 50
58

60 50

Option level Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree

No of respondent 42 58 0 0 0

42

40 30
20

10 80 0 70
60

No of respond
Strongly agree 71 Agree Neutral

50
40

30 20 10 0 Yes

No of respond

Option level Yes No

No of respondent 71 29

70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Strongly agree 72 0 Agree

Option level Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree

No of respondent 0 0 0 65 35

Neutral No of respond

80 70
60

50 40 30 20
10

28

Option level Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree

No of respondent 72 28 0 0 0

0
Strongly agree Agree Neutral

No of No respondent of respondent
63

No of respondent No of respondent 0 neutral agree 0 disagree no neutral 00 0 0 strongly disagree disagree

Chart Title
No of respondent Option level Option level No of respondent

No of respondent

No of respondent

No of respondent

0 no

No of respondent

20 16 12 No of respondent

Minimum Fuel policy Minimum risk investment

37 Series1
Series2

1 Agree Neutral

1 Disagree

Strongly disagree

No of respondent

No of respondent

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly disagree

No of respondent

No of respondent

0 Neutral

0 Disagree

0 Strongly disagree

No of respondent

No of respondent

No of respondent Neutral Disagree Strongly


disagree 27 20 No of respondent

machine cost quality focused

competitive advantage

No of respondent
24

12

13

No of respondent

Handling Scrap Input No of respondent minimum feeding

No of respondent

0 Neutral

0 Disagree

0 Strongly disagree

No of respondent

No of respondent

No of respondent
0 Neutral 0 Disagree 0 Strongly disagree

29

No of respondent

No of respondent No
65

35 No of respondent

0 Neutral Disagree Strongly No of respondent

disagree

No of respondent

0
Neutral

0
Disagree

0
Strongly disagree

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi