Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
#VALUE! 37 63 0 0 0
No of respond
70 60 60100 50 50 37 40 80 37 50 40 30 60 30 37 40 40 20 20 10 30 20 10 0 0 0 strongly agree neutral 20 strongly yes agree agree agree 10 0 63 63 100
No of respondent
70
60
63
No of respondent 35
Option level
0
No of respondent
0 0
2002 government policy Foreign equity policy Minimum risk Fuel policy Minimum investment
Percentag e of 30 responde 25 nt 35 21 20 30 21 31 12 16 20
25 15 20 10 15 5 10
0 5
31 12 16 20
No of respond
No of respond
120
100
100
80
60 40
No of respondent 100 0
20 0 yes
No of respond
35
30
31
21
25 20 15
option level
No of respondent
10
2002 government policy Foreign equity policy Minimum risk Fuel policy Minimum investment
21 31 12 16 20
Minimum
40 30
37
option level
No of respondent
20
61 37 1 1 0
10
0
No of respond
60 51 49
60 50 40 30
20
51
49
10 0
option level
No of respondent
51 49 0 0 0
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
No of respond
60 50
40
52
48
option level
No of respondent
30
52 48 0 0 0
20
10
No of respond
60
50 40 30
48 42
30 20
option level
No of respondent
10
42 48 0 0 0
0
35 30 25 20 15 10
Strongly agree 33
Agree
No of respond Neutral
20
option level
No of respondent
33 20 27 20
Inflation
machine cost
No of respond
35
30
31
25 20 15
20
option level
No of respondent
10
20 31 24 12 13
Handling No of respond
70 60 50 40 30
34
No of respondent 66 34 0 0 0
No of respond
70 60 50
58
60 50
No of respondent 42 58 0 0 0
42
40 30
20
10 80 0 70
60
No of respond
Strongly agree 71 Agree Neutral
50
40
30 20 10 0 Yes
No of respond
No of respondent 71 29
No of respondent 0 0 0 65 35
Neutral No of respond
80 70
60
50 40 30 20
10
28
No of respondent 72 28 0 0 0
0
Strongly agree Agree Neutral
No of No respondent of respondent
63
Chart Title
No of respondent Option level Option level No of respondent
No of respondent
No of respondent
No of respondent
0 no
No of respondent
20 16 12 No of respondent
37 Series1
Series2
1 Agree Neutral
1 Disagree
Strongly disagree
No of respondent
No of respondent
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
No of respondent
No of respondent
0 Neutral
0 Disagree
0 Strongly disagree
No of respondent
No of respondent
competitive advantage
No of respondent
24
12
13
No of respondent
No of respondent
0 Neutral
0 Disagree
0 Strongly disagree
No of respondent
No of respondent
No of respondent
0 Neutral 0 Disagree 0 Strongly disagree
29
No of respondent
No of respondent No
65
35 No of respondent
disagree
No of respondent
0
Neutral
0
Disagree
0
Strongly disagree