Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 4

Effects And Methods Of Minimizing Construction Delays Delays are the most critical part of construction projects.

They have huge negat ive effects on projects such as court cases between contractors and clients, inc rease in cost, poor quality of end products etc. This chapter throws light on wh at kind of effects are there due to the causes of delays which are identified in last chapter, or in other words effects of delays caused in construction projec ts. This chapter will also discuss required actions and methods to minimize such delays in construction industry. 3.2 EFFECTS OF DELAY: Lot of work has been carried out to identify effects of delay in construction pr ojects. Sambasivan and Soon (2007) distinguished six effects of delays they were time overrun, cost overrun, disputes, arbitration, litigation and total abandon ment. Aibinu and Jagboro (2002) also gave same six effects of delay. Kaliba et a l (2009) gave effects as poor quality of end products, project extension, litiga tion and cost overrun. Time Overrun: When project is delayed and time is extended to complete that situ ation is called time overrun. Client and contractor related factors of delay are responsible for time overrun. Inadequate planning, improper site management, in adequate experience of projects, delay in interim payments, change in design etc . are such factors. Cost Overrun: Contractual factors such as change orders, mistakes and disagreeme nts in contract and inflation due to time overrun also lead to cost overrun. Cor relation analysis between cost and time overrun and cost overrun indicated a str ong linkage. Disputes: Client related factors, external factors, contractual relationships th at arise during project. Delayed interim payments, owners interference, change r equirements, improper management information system etc. creates disputes which inturn can lead to arbitration or litigation. Arbitration: Client related and contractual relationship related factors which c reates disputes leads to be settlement by arbitration, which involves third part y to settle issue out of court. Litigation: Client related, labour related, contractual relationship related fac tors and external factors leads to disputes which are not even solved by arbitra tion leads to litigation. Litigation is the last way to settle disputes. Total Abandonment: Sometimes client related, contractual relationship related, c onsultant, resource related etc., any cause which creates disputes and is unable to reach some result is totally abandoned. EFFECTS OF DELAY RANK Time Overrun 1 Cost Overrun 2 Dispute

3 Arbitration 4 Litigation 5 Total Abandonment 6 Table 3.1 The effects of delays and its rankings (Aibinu and Jagboro 2002) 3.3 RECOMMENDATIONS AND METHODS TO MINIMIZE DELAYS: Several scholars have studied problem of delay and their effects as a result the y have given their recommendations and methods to minimize delay in construction projects. Aibinu and Jagboro (2002): identified two methods to minimize delay in construct ion projects they studied Nigerian construction industry. Acceleration of site activities: They suggested that in case of delay successive site activities are accelerated but this not always make up for loss of time or delay occurred. The reason behind this is that due to set up of acceleration it seems progress but due to inefficient project management problem that caused de lay remains in force and results overall acceleration ineffective. Contingency Allowance: Contingency fund is some extra amount kept at the budget stage. This amount is must be realistic and sufficient to contain risk of unfore seen cost increase during construction. As per Aibinu amount kept as contingency allowance in most of the construction projects is not sufficient to cover cost escalations. They suggested that 17.34% of project estimate should be kept as co ntingency allowance. Nguyen et al (2004): They identified various methods of minimizing delays in con struction projects. They studied projects of Vietnam. This table below shows all the factors given by them. INFLUENCING COMPONENTS COMPONENT 1 FIRST COM COMPONENT 2 SECOND COM COMPONENT 3 THIRD COM COMPONENT 4 FOURTH COM 1 Adequate funding throughout the project. Up to date technology utilization. Commitment to project

Community involvement 2 Comprehensive contract documentation. Proper emphasis on past experience. Clear objectives and scopes Clear information/communication channel 3 Availability of resources Multidisciplinary/ competent project team. Top management support. Frequent progress meetings. 4 Continuing involvement of stakeholders Awarding bids to the right designer/ contractors 5 Competent project managers Table 3.2 Source Nguyen et al (2004); Factor analysis grouping for success facto rs. Odeh and Battaineh (2002): suggested following ways to minimize construction del ays. Implementation of liquidated damage clause in contracts and offering incentives or awards for early completion. Transforming way human resources are taken in construction industry. Proper trai ning must be provided and craftsmen must be classified. This also involves const ruction engineers so that their managerial skills could be improved. Proper trai ning in scheduling, time and cost control, information systems, and management o f human resources is required. Contract award procedure must be transformed by giving less weightage to price a nd more weightage to skill and past performance of contractor. Adopting new types of contracts which reduce delay by limiting owners interference , improving design and contractual relationship. Contracts for example construct ion management and design build are good for such purpose. Sambasivan and soon (2007): They suggested their recommendations in three groups . Client: Contractor must not be selected only on lowest bid, but experience, tech nical capability, skill, financial ability, and adequate manpower. Client must n

ot interfere during execution and must not bring major changes to design. Client must pay interim payments properly, he must have sufficient funds. Client must have quick decision power. Consultant: Consultant must not leave any discrepancy in contract drafting. He m ust approve drawings and designs on time. Work should be monitored regularly at appropriate intervals so as to judge progress. Contractor: Job out of expertise and experience must not be taken. Contractors sta ff must be technically sound, there must be proper site managers. Work should be properly planned and plan must be given to client. Contractor must have proper finance as back up. 3.4 CONCLUSION: From the above literature review it can be seen that a lot of work has been done in understanding causes, effects and methods to minimize construction delay. Th e major effects of construction delay are described as time overrun, cost overru n, dispute, arbitration, litigation and total abandonment. To reduce these effec t lot of recommendations and methods are suggested. Out of which major factors a re related to proper project management, scheduling and cost estimating which ca n reduce disputes and other delays. Some other factors are design management, cl ients interference, changing orthodox ways to tender or awarding project to contra ctor. But in spite all above recommendations and methods delay occurs, disputes are th ere, claims are there because construction industry is vast which involves lot o f stakeholders and parties. So its complex to keep every sector satisfied. It de pends on management skill and leadership quality of hierarchy involved. Proper w ork breakdown structure and task responsibility matrix is also important parts w hich must be taken into account when it comes to minimize delay. Construction pr ojects are complex projects and involve lot of funding. Money could be the main reason of dispute so all funding must be arranged before project is given green signal to start. Read more: http://www.ukessays.com/dissertation/literature-review//effects-and-m ethods-of-minimizing-construction-delays.php#ixzz2TLFhbj9C

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi