Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
The FKW CO2 Earth Heat Pipe as Earth Probe for Geothermal Heat Pumps
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr. h.c. H. Kruse
FKW Research Centre of Refrigeration and Heat Pumps Weidendamm 12-14, 30167 Hannover, Germany
EU Workshop, Brussels
28 .05 .2008
Content
Seasonal Performance Factor SPF of f Ground G d Source S Heat H t Pumps P with ith Brine Bi E Earth th P Probes. b EU Project for improving Ground Source Heat Pumps for higher Efficiencies and Temperatures. Improving Borehole Heat Exchangers by applying the thermodynamic principle of a Thermosyphon Heat Pipe.
Prsentation 25.05.03 2
Summary
Study and EU Project GROUND HIT show that it is possible to achieve reasonable high SPF with HFC-refrigerants by application of the earth-to-water system.
Ground Source heat pumps as developed by GROUND HIT offer a good basis for further improvements by optimizing the
Conventional:
Brine Earth Probe with water-glycol or water-salt solutions Ground Water Endangering Class 1, Germany: (WG1)
- Innovative: CO2 Earth Heat Pipe p Carbon Dioxide: not ground water endangering (WG -)
-
Polyethylene U-type tube Brine Earth Probe Corrugated stainless steel single tube CO2 Heat Pipe Thermosyhon principle
An easy installation in the standard shaft ( 120 cm) being outside in the open area in the subsoil under the new building
Swiss Study on Geothermal Heat Pumps Seasonal Performance Factors (BfE 2004)
Prsentation 25.05.03
Spirally grooved fl ibl flexible pipe i i is best suited for an even distribution of the downward flowing liquid film at the inner wall circumference.
Liquid film in the i inner grooves is i best b t protected against the shear stress from the upward flowing vapour in the core of the pipe, pipe preventing entrainment effects.
10
Experimental Comparison of CO2 Earth Heat Pipe and Brine Earth Probe
11
Field Test in Berlin Earth Heat Pipe and Brine Earth Probe
Temperatures in the Refrigerant Cycle and at the outside Wall of the CO2 Heat Pipe depending on time and borehole depth
V e r s u c h : 0 4 .0 6 .0 5 0 U h r - 0 6 .0 6 .0 5 0 U h r D a t e n d e r K lte a n la g e a n d e r 1 0 0 m la n g e n S o le -S o n d e
R 4 0 7 C - V e r d a m p fu n g s t e m p . d e r S o le s o n d e R 4 0 7 C -V e rd a m p fu n g s te m p . d e r C O 2 -S o n d e A u e n te m p e ra tu r S o le - E in t r it ts te m p e r a tu r in d ie E r d e C O 2 - E in t r itt s te m p e r a t u r in d i e E r d e F l s s ig k e it v o r A K V ( R 4 0 7 C )
40 35 30 25 F l s s ig k e it v o r A K V
40 35 30 25 20 15 A u e n te m p e ra tu r 10 5 S o l e - E i n t r it t s t e m p . i n d i e E r d e C O 2 - E in tr itts t e m p . in d ie E r d e R 4 0 7 C -V e r d a m p f u n g s te m p e ra tu r d e r C O 2 -S o n d e R 4 0 7 C - V e r d a m p fu n g s te m p e r a tu r d e r S o le s o n d e 0 -5 -1 0 -1 5 -2 0 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48
T e m p e ra tu re n z w is c h e n 3 u n d 6 U h r in C 0 10 20 30 Teufe in m
13
Temperatur [C]
20 15 10 5 0 -5 -1 0 -1 5 -2 0
40 50 60 70
Z e it [h h ]
T e m p e r a t u r e s o n t h e o u ts id e w a ll o f t h e e a r t h p r o b e
T e m p e ra tu re n a n d e r A u e n w a n d d e s E rd w rm e ro h re s
4 3 2 4 3 2
E rd te m p . b e i 4 0 m
80 90 100 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 R o h rw a n d te m p e ra tu r in C
Temperatur [C]
1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 0 6 12 18
R o h r te m p . b e i 9 0 m R o h r te m p . b e i 3 0 m R o h rte m p . b e i 4 0 m
1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 48
R o h r te m p . b e i 5 0 m R o h r te m p . b e i 8 0 m R o hrtem p. b ei 10 m
24
30
36
42
Z e it [h h ]
20.-23.5.05: 60 h 1.-2.6.05: 24 h
-1.4
-6.4
44.4
56.5
-3.3
-8.3
26.9
60.4
4.-6.6.05: 48 h
-1.4
-13.9
37.6
42.4
-3.9
-9.1
37.5
60.0
7.-8.6.05: 18 h
-0.5
-13.5
51.9
43.4
-3.6
-8.8
51.0
61.7
Temperatures at the CO2 Heat Pipe and the Brine Earth Probe
Test Results and calculated COP Values of the Brine Earth Probe and the CO2 Earth Heat Pipe at different Heat Extraction Rates
System tB1 tB2 tBrine Bi to tc COPc COPh tom tEarth E th Qo l
[oC]
[oC]
[K]
[oC]
[oC]
[K]
[K]
[W/m]
Brine
-1.4
+0.2
1.6
-13.9
37.6
2.81
3.81
13.3
12.3
42.4
100
CO2
-3.9
-3.9
-9.1
37.5
3.23
4.23
5.2
15.4
60
100
CO2
+0.6
+0.6
-4.6
37.5
3.71
4.71
5.2
10.9
42.4
100
Conclusion
CO2 Heat Pipe with an equal heat pump leads to a different heat extraction rate of 60 W/m as the Brine Earth Probe with 42,4 W/m. Heating COP is 11% better for the CO2 EHP ( No brine pump power has been taken into consideration) CO2 Heat Pipe at an equal heat extraction rate as the Brine Earth Probe of 50 W/m results in an Heating COP of 25% better than the BEP. ( No brine power pump has been taken into consideration )
Pilot Systems with FKW-CO2 Heat Pipes in Germany and Austria 2005 - 2007
Location Type of heat pump Heating capacity Length of the heat pipe Cooling capacity Sub soil Start up
Schriesheim Bad Knig Crailsheim Emsbach Nordheim/Heilbronn Ludwigshafen Kappelrodeck/Achern Eppingen/Richen Bammental Waldburg(A)
8,5 KW 5,5 KW
1 x 100m 1 x 80m
6,6 KW 4,3 KW
silt/rock silt/rock
15.09.05 18.10.05
Hoval DV15P
15 KW
2 x 100m
12 KW
lime stone
24.10.05
8,5 KW 8,5 KW
1 x 100m 1 x 100m
6,6 KW 6,6 KW
15.04.06 15.10.06
Hoval DV8P
8,5 KW
1 x 100m
6,6 KW
sand/groundwater
10.11.06
Hoval DV7P
5,5 KW
1 x 80m
4,3 KW
silt/rock
8,5 KW 8,5 KW ?
6,6 KW 6,6 KW ?
silt/rock silt ?
Comparison of a CO2 Heat Pipe with Brine Earth Probe Experience pe e ce with t inserting se t g stainless sta ess Stee Steel Heat eat Pipe pe into to Bore Hole Development of Heat Pipe HX and Compact Heat Pump
FFfff
Heat Pipe
Heizung Heating
DN32 - 100m
27
EIFER (European Institute for Energy Research) Systherma Planungsbro fr Erdwrmesyteme GmbH Kaeltro Kltetechnik Angewandte Geologie Karlsruhe (University Karlsruhe) FKW Forschungszentrum FKWF h f Kl fr Klte- und d W Wrmepumpentechnik h ik