Dove tails To fill in the gaps God whatever aspect one might think He is, a personable God or an austere

father, is love. God is not a lover of pain, sadistic in nature or malicious. If one has such a god that enjoys inflicting pain on followers I would advise finding another unless pain is ones thing. Gods as even the most adamant atheist would (smugly) tell you are for the benefit of the masses. Atheist would also say God has become a hindrance to mankind but then they would have to discredit all that was gained by religion. They do make attempts at such, but are not as yet convincing or so numerous to achieve command of mankinds vote on the subject of God.

They might add stipulations such as control of societies or pressing personal or group agendas but they would have even the flying spaghetti monster do so for the supposed benefit of the people. I having not full pirate regalia (a prerequisite for FSM to bestow knowledge or excess ptarmigan to its followers) cannot ask FSM. Sour grapes being what they are I tell myself it would be a waste of funds for the outfit. I dont do Halloween either for it is an indulgence and dangerous to both teeth and soul. I do have a candy bar now and again and the hat and cutlass help put me in the mood for writing Si-Fi stories.

It is sufficient to say that one of the better tactics of opponents of the existence of God or self-aware pasta is the argument of the god of the gaps. This is simplest terms is that when a person has reached the limits of ones own capacity there comes a need for a god. Gods become an excuse for lack of understanding or ability to grasp knowledge and this coupled with a distain to acknowledge God and an implied obligation to such. This seems illogical to me in that if there is a God He is not so limited in understanding or ability where knowledge is concerned. Therefore if there is a God the problem of understanding must fall on mans side of the fence, and atheist by default must admit this seeing that they say there is no god to blame. They can only blame the misuse of the concept of gods on men of the past and pretend that they themselves will not do the same. The unwillingness to be obligated to one of higher understanding seems similar to the naive child screaming no to the parent who is trying to teach the dangers of fire or deep waters. I find it Ludicrous, (comically ridiculous) to think that any Christian, Jewish, Muslim or to be quite honest any human person with a reasonable mind cannot understand that God if there is one wants to benefit mankind. Personally if there are gods that intend harm to men they prove themselves as foes of peace and should be obliterated in like manor and proportion as they would have it done to man. War it would seem can happen even in the heavens. The only way to stop war is for one side or the other to win with no possibility of farther competition. Logic is a cold and unyielding lover whether friend or foe. The little sister of wisdom almost her twin but without compassion and unrelenting if she thinks she is right. She does not always ask of her elder sister approval or acceptance. If wrong she only says she changed her mind for the better or it was necessary. As for all other religions there is at least one god or wise man that takes up for mankind in whatever pantheon is looked at. Afore mentioned atheist and FSMs are excluded from such concerns and need not bother with reading more unless insight into this reasoning tickles their ears, but such persons should do so only being sure it is not a stray noddle appendage.

Here I must stop to explain and show if not already seen that in the previous paragraphs it could be perceived that I sniped and used parts of the Christian bible from front to back. I being aware of and not wanting to be guilty of adding or taking away from any book within that book point out that it is a part of western culture, the English language and the belief system of over a billion persons and an influence to many more. Herein is a problem for many as how to bridge this gap from the noble and the profane and still maintain an agreeable understanding. In Ezekiel chapter 33 three verses stand out for me. Not in arrogates but rather admiration of the wisdom held within.

And they come unto thee as the people cometh, and they sit before thee as my people, and they hear thy words, but they will not do them: for with their mouth they; shew (show) much love, but their heart goeth after their covetousness 33:31 And lo, thou art unto them as a very lovely song of one that hath a pleasant voice, and can play well on an instrument: for they hear thy words, but they do them not. 33:32 And when this comth to pass, lo, it will come then shall they know that a prophet hath been among them. 33:33 If one tells someone something from God they will not do it, for their heart goes after what it wants not what it is told to do. The teller may speak well but instructions are not followed. And when what is told happens they know that a prophet was among them. Of

course in todays world prophets are often considered no better than a stock broker who can only say I told you to by that or sell this. The sad truth is that a rebellious deep seed of defiance is part of all men not yet given over to God if one is to be had. Like three year olds testing the limits of freedom we see how far we can push our parents towards the cliffs of homicidal fits of retribution all the time confident that love will save our backsides. Poor parenting perhaps leads to barbaric hordes of teens but hope is not yet lost for time if it is had will teach many life lessons.

It is the child that never hears the past nor respects parents that grows into a selfconfident fool. Of course this person banks on the possibility of being right, of beating the odds or starting their own company beholden to none. God makes no sense to them other than being a tool to use to keep the employees (the lesser persons) in line. FSMers may knowingly succumb to the tricks of the winking noddle paradox at this point and grin and the atheist that points at them and laughs. This use of God is perverse to the religious but useful to some that do not regard Him as real. Immoral and unethical if God is used this way to the theologian it is no hindrance to the person that thinks themselves above the need of God or have convinced themselves that there

is no God. All the time such persons thinking God believing fools will do what they are told less they easily be called hypocrites for not loving the supposed laughing sinners and thusly discounted even among their fellow believers. They are like children defiant, rebellious, not even acknowledging that there could be a god but banking on love and faith of the ones that do. They are manipulators or smart enough to use the system depending on point of view. It is illogical to hope that mercy will come from something that is not. If there is no god the higher thinkers perhaps should hope that they are not convincing to the masses. For if the world is rid of such loving gods what might happen to the persons that did away with them and the restraints of said beings. I find it somewhat disquieting to think of a world of sheep turned into wolves. Here then is nothing more than a reasoning of the handiness of having a god or two to control the masses. This only shows that if there is a God He has been misused, twisted to the desires of men not respecting of God or even FSM. Can this be untwisted and used anew and correctly?

Time being somewhat linier ask that we should understand that the present is the result of the past and that our understanding of the past can lead to a use of this thinking to replicate similar results. Science and logic find there use in this parading to controlling ones

own life. If this is the case Sir Isaac Newton perhaps should be subscribed to and the realist view. If not one may still find use of counting or navigation in said sciences. Alas if time is not a real thing I think it less likely to hope that persons will learn from what they do not regard. Then what if a person finds that all that one puts their mind to can be achieved and the past is of no use. Beating the odds and becoming all that can be dreamed with no thought to outdated or illogical thought or religions which have no science to back up such clams of the metaphysical dreamlands. Dreamlands riddled by the gaps seen of logical minds where for example the earth was made first and the stars after a few days. Evolution points to the gaps, sciences and logic are called wisdom and God becomes a creationist, illogical and non-scientific tool to control lesser persons that do not think at higher levels. Herein many are called Imbeciles, idiots, or morons to name but a few descriptive words of angry militant persons thinking themselves to be geniuses. Boastful, proud, arrogant persons that scream to the masses to do what they see to be right and thereby bring that persons dream to pass. Three year olds that want the world to conform to their will.

Here if one is not already offended I would say that there may yet be hope for that mind. Rather than exploit the reverse for the theologians I shall put forth that they have missed the mark by not surpassing the genius of our day. Can the theologians not read their book and overcome the stigmas of name callers? I would say no, for the name calling group says any counter is based on the metaphysical and all is discounted without regard of soundness of part or whole of any theological stance. The name callers will not extend respect to the past but even ridicule their own past heroes like beginning plebs not yet let in on the higher levels to

which they have reached. Three year olds with water guns having all the fun until the guns are turned and water gets in their eyes.

There is an answer that is so plain that I wonder that some disparagement is not warranted for the theologians or that I like the child that did not hear that the water gun hogging tyrannical emperors new robes where so fine that only geniuses can see them. To this end if there is a God He is for us (our benefit) and will as he says of Himself show mans wisdom to be foolishness. At the least one would think He could pass out more water guns. Here the emperor might point and laugh saying our water guns would only be make-believe. So be it then let us test this and see if our water guns dampen the robes. Reality it would seem does not conform unless all are agreed. This said I should demand that there be a logical scientific way to close the gap of such places as Geneses 1:1 and 1:2 that atheist, evolutionist and many others that have found themselves coming near this question of earth and stars and the order of their making only to slide to a hasty stop at this gaps edge. They all, not seeing a bridge or zip line of noddle or even a springboard to traverse said ditch. I find that my pirates hat, water postil and sword beckon to me but that perhaps they are not needed. For if there is a God we can take him at his word and see that this is not a problem in the light of a simple answer.

The answer is this; if we are to surpass the thinkers of today we perhaps should look to the best thinker namely God, who said He was the beginning and the end in the following way. One, God is for us in that if we have fallen He wants to help us regain our higher state of being. This would also be true of the earth. Here the gap can be shown; In the beginning God
created the heaven and the earth. Genesis 1.1 Heaven and earth came first as can be seen and is often pointed out by critics that the stars are noted a few days later of this starting of the narrative. The gap that is seen and which would be illogical can be pointed out in this, if God makes something would He not make it be in its optimal form and capacity? The earth should have been a paradise before man was put on it. Not as is recorded that verse two and confirmed in verse twenty eight Be fruitful and multiply and replenish the earth This is somewhat a quizzical thing for me seeing that verse two states; And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. The earth was perhaps

made a paradise and as a result of war in the heavens made without form and void. Otherwise this replenishing command makes no sense for one cannot replenish unless something has been stocked and supplied anew. It is logical to think that something used up or diminished earth so that a need to replenish came about. This cannot be the fall of man for Adam was newly made.

What is war like in the heavens? I ask this to show the answer, the dove tail, that the answer fits and was given from the first and to the last. Our best answer is found in the book of Revelations. If God was ever to show his fighting side I would think this the best book to look at. Wasp, hail, and painful and grievous sores in the privy parts aside as found in the book of Joshua Revelations shows a worldwide effect of the displeasure and wrath given to unrepentant men. It should be noted that once the wrath is spent heaven and earth are made anew. Rev. 21: 23 And the city had no need of the sun, neither of the moon, to shine in it for the glory of God did lighten it and the Lamb is the light thereof. Jesus is the Lamb, the Light, the Word of God and many other names but this is sufficient to show the point. God said the words and what was said comes to pass or as many Muslims, Jews and most Christens will say All that is needed is that God speaks and it will be. Now let us state this as plainly as possible. If God made the earth correctly it would not need stars or suns or moons for they were given as sings to men after the world was made void. The earth was filled with the light of God and did not need stars or suns for as in Eden God walked and talked directly with man. After a war were evil came to earth, after the world was damaged the stars were needed. War correspondence is another paper.

God set about to fix the world and made Eden and made a man from the dust mixed with Gods breaths, breaths in the plural but that also is another paper. After Adams fall a long term plan was made to elevate mankind and the plan was the word and the word came down to us. The Bible if it is to be taken literally would logically have to have this answer or it would not be complete and thus not of God. I find it madding that it has been thousands of years since

man was given this book of answers and yet rebels at the instructions therein. As I stated before man does have a rebellious sinful nature to overcome as evolution tries to helps to explain mans slow realization of higher beings or even FSMs and personal emulation of said beings. Admittedly if some people that are in possession of somewhat nimble minds perceive this shortcoming blame is attached to either one of two groups. Group one to name a few would hold Gods FSMs space seeds or ETs to account. Group two being somewhat smaller is limited to men who are not willing to admit faults or even disobedience to higher ideas even if the ideas would improve mankind. Evolution a perceived answer to mans faults blames the concept of time and lots of it. I see a gap here for discounters of time that made them that way. So angry little militant atheist or gap seeing empiricists minded persons yell that no scientific mind should believe in God or even FSMs. Rather they now say after more studying of the universe shows us that grinding dust and universes made at no cost are the truer facts of the mater even if multiverses are not seen. They tell the masses that this is better than a FSM or even a God. They ask if any God believer can come up with an answer and laugh at the thought that one might not have to dream up floating cities so big that a world could be filled by its light.

That city was written about thousands of years ago they might say but that is still far more advanced than what is doable by todays science. Perhaps we need more time which is

the pat answer of doubters and evolutionists. Or the city could comeback but that would mean no more time to tell the city dwellers you cant hear them because you got your ears clogged up from not having your ears irrigated. Water has been called the word and words mean a plan so it would seem this city was part of the plan of God from the start to the end. Angry children might hope that the ears are clogged by noddle ends for they have rejected that every knee shall bend part of the theologys outdated texts or imagined water guns that shot at their ears and robes. This is ofcourse illogical FSMs noddles are not used to plug ears up unless it sui ts FSMs.

Last note, the spirit is often referred to as water and the spirit was hovering above the void and formless earth and water cleans all and brings life and part of the big plan. Men seem to think that the city can be made given time without a God or even an FSM, man says to the air I can do this by myself. Should one duck and doge all shots to waxed ears? Or will angry militant children say the wax is made up also and clam perfect hearing of what they say does not exist while making plans to copy cities dreamed of thousands of years ago? Man is a

difficult child.