Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
it is responsible for over 36,000 changes t hat appear t oday in t he new versions. This manuscript was "found" in 1481 in t he Vat ican library in Rome, where it is current ly held, and from whence it received it s name. It is writ t en on expensive vellum, a fine parchment originally from t he skin of calf or ant elope. Some aut horit ies claim t hat it was one of a bat ch of 50 Bibles ordered from Egypt by t he R oman E mperor Const ant ine; hence it s beaut iful appearance and t he expensive skins which were used for it s pages. But alas! t his manuscript , like it s corrupt Egypt ian part ner Codex Sinait icus (Aleph) is also riddled wit h omissions, insert ions and amendment s . The corrupt and unreliable nat ure of Codex B is best summed up by one who has t horoughly examined t hem, John W Burgon: "The impurity of the text exhibited by
PDFmyURL.com
t horoughly examined t hem, John W Burgon: "The impurity of the text exhibited by these codices is not a question of opinion but fact...In the Gospels alone, Codex B(Vatican) leaves out words or whole clauses no less than 1,491 times. It bears traces of careless transcriptions on every page" According t o The West minst er Dict ionary of t he Bible, "It should be noted . . . that there is no prominent Biblical (manuscripts) in which there occur such gross cases of misspelling, faulty grammar, and omission, as in (Codex) B."
distinct attention to it) is in the highest degree significant, and admits only one interpretation. The older manuscript from which Codex B was copied must have infallibly contained the twelve verses in dispute. The copyist was instructed to leave them out -- and he obeyed; but he prudently left a blank space in memoriam rei. Never was a blank more intelligible! Never was silence more eloquent! By this simple expedient, strange to relate, the Vatican Codex is made to refute itself even while it seems to be bearing testimony against the concluding verses of St. Marks Gospel, by withholding them; for it forbids the inference which, under ordinary circumstances, must have been drawn from that omission. It does more. By leaving room for the verses it omits, it brings into prominent notice at the end of fifteen centuries and a half, a more ancient witness than itself. (Burgon, The Last Twelve Verses of t he Gospel of St . M ark Vindicat ed, 1871, pp. 86-87) 5. Similar t o Codex Sinait icus, Codex Vat icanus ident ifies it self as a product of gnost ic corrupt ion in John 1:18, where the only begotten Son is changed t o the only begotten God , t hus perpet uat ing t he ancient Arian heresy t hat disassociat es t he Son of God Jesus Christ from God Himself by claiming t hat t he Word was not t he same as t he Son. Johns Gospel ident ifies t he Son direct ly wit h t he Word (John 1:1, 18), but by changing "Son" t o "God " in verse 18, t his direct associat ion is broken. 6. Linguist ic scholars have observed t hat Codex Vat icanus is reminiscent of classical and Plat onic Greek, not Koine Greek of t he New Test ament (see Adolf Deissman's Light of t he Ancient East ) . Nest le admit t ed t hat he had t o change his Greek t ext (when using Vat icanus and Sinait icus) t o make it "appear" like Koine Greek. 7. Codex Vat icanus cont ains t he false Roman Cat holic apocryphal books such as Judit h, Tobias, and Baruch, while it omit s t he past oral epist les (I Timot hy t hrough Tit us), t he Book of Revelat ion, and it cut s off t he Book of Hebrews at Hebrews 9:14 (a very convenient st opping point for t he Cat holic Church, since God forbids t heir priest hood in Hebrews 10 and exposes t he mass as t ot ally useless as well!).
Manuscripts Codex Sinaiticus Receptus Westcott & Hort Altered Verses Constantine Catholics & the Jesuits
Textus Tischendorf
PDFmyURL.com
PDFmyURL.com