PENYERAHAN DAN PENILAIAN TUGASAN ASSIGNMENT SUBMISSION AND ASSESSMENT _________________________________________________________________________ OUMM3203 PROFESSIONAL ETHICS MAY 2013 _________________________________________________________________________

ARAHAN KEPADA PELAJAR / INSTRUCTIONS TO STUDENTS

1. Tugasan ini mengandungi SATU (1) soalan sahaja yang disediakan dalam bahasa modul bercetak kursus ini. / This assignment contains only ONE (1) question that is set in the language of the printed module for the course. 2. Jawab dalam Bahasa Melayu atau Bahasa Inggeris. / Answer in Malay or English. 3. Muat turunkan templat tugasan versi bahasa yang berkenaan daripada MyVLE untuk penyediaan dan penyerahan tugasan anda. Tugasan anda hendaklah ditaip dengan menggunakan saiz fon 12 Times New Roman dan langkau baris 1.5. / Download the language version of the assignment template concerned from the MyVLE for preparation and submission of your assignment. Your assignment should be typed using 12 point Times New Roman font and 1.5 line spacing. 4. Tugasan anda hendaklah antara 2500 hingga 3000 patah perkataan tidak termasuk rujukan. Bilangan perkataan hendaklah ditunjukkan di hujung tugasan anda. Jangan menyalin soalan dan arahan tugasan dalam jawapan anda . / Your assignment should be between 2500 to 3000 words excluding references. The number of words should be shown at the end of your assignment. Do not copy the assignment question and instructions to your answer. 5. Anda dikehendaki menghantar tugasan SECARA ON-LINE melalui MyVLE. Sila rujuk kepada portal untuk arahan mengenai prosedur menghantar tugasan anda secara on-line . Anda dinasihatkan menyimpan senaskah tugasan yang diserahkan untuk rujukan sendiri. / You must submit your assignment ON-LINE via the MyVLE. Refer to the portal for instructions on the procedures to submit your assignment on-line. You are advised to keep a copy of your submitted assignment for personal reference.

6. Anda hanya boleh menghantar tugasan SEKALI sahaja dalam SATU fail. / You can submit your assignment ONCE only in a SINGLE file. 7. Tugasan anda hendaklah diserahkan antara 9hb Julai 2013 hingga 17hb Julai 2013. Serahan selepas 17hb Julai 2013 TIDAK akan diterima. / Your assignment must be submitted between 9th July 2013 until 17th July 2013. Submission after 17th July 2013 will NOT be accepted. 8. Tugasan hendaklah disiapkan secara individu. Anda dilarang meniru tugasan orang lain. Anda juga dilarang sama sekali memplagiat kerja orang lain sebagai kerja sendiri . / Your assignment should be prepared individually. You should not copy another persons assignment. You should also not plagiarise another persons work as your own.

PENILAIAN / EVALUATION Tugasan ini menyumbang sehingga 40% daripada jumlah markah kursus berkenaan dan akan dinilai berdasarkan kepada Rubrik yang dilampirkan. / This assignment accounts for 40% of the total marks for the course and shall be assessed based on the Rubrics attached . Anda akan diberikan maklum balas tentang tugasan ini sebelum Peperiksaan Akhir Semester bermula. / You would be given feedback on the assignment before the Final Semester Examination commences. PLAGIARISME: POTONGAN MARKAH / PLAGIARISM: MARKS DEDUCTION Amaran: Tugasan yang diserahkan, secara automatik, akan disemak untuk menentukan kadar pertindihan. Jika plagiarisme dikesan, markah akan dipotong seperti berikut: / Warning : The submitted assignment will automatically undergo a similarity check. If plagiarism is detected, marks would be deducted as follows: Tugasan dengan pertindihan Tugasan dengan pertindihan Tugasan dengan pertindihan Assignments with 10 - 30 % Assignments with 31 - 50 % kandungan antara 10 - 30%: potongan 20% daripada jumlah markah yang diperoleh. kandungan antara 31 - 50%: potongan 40% daripada jumlah markah yang diperoleh. kandungan lebih daripada 50%: Markah sifar akan diberikan. overlap with others: 20% deduction from the total marks scored. overlap with others: 40% deduction from the total marks scored.

Assignments with more than 50% overlap with others: Zero mark would be given. ASSIGNMENT QUESTION

PURPOSE The assignment is aimed at providing learners with the opportunity to use analytical methods of reasoning to reach a decision on an ethical problem. REQUIREMENT Bribery has been and continues to be a part of the social structure of many cultures. For example, the American Vice President, Spiro Agnew, resigned from office after it was discovered that he took bribes while serving as Governor of Maryland. In sports, Pakistani cricketers were found guilty of accepting bribes in certain matches against England. Bribery can be in many forms, such as gifts, kickbacks, donations, contributions, share options or career promotions. Rasuah telah dan terus menjadi sebahagian daripada struktur sosial banyak budaya. Sebagai contoh, Naib Presiden Amerika Syarikat, Spiro Agnew, meletak jawatan dari jawatan selepas ia ditemui bahawa dia telah mengambil rasuah semasa berkhidmat sebagai Gabenor Maryland. Dalam sukan, kriket Pakistan telah didapati bersalah menerima rasuah dalam perlawanan tertentu terhadap England. Rasuah boleh dalam pelbagai bentuk, seperti hadiah, sogokan, derma, sumbangan, opsyen saham atau promosi kerjaya. Define the act of bribery. Using the economic, legal and ethical approaches, analyse the issue of bribery to conclusively demonstrate its position from the moral point of view. Menentukan tindakan rasuah. Menggunakan pendekatan ekonomi, undang-undang dan etika, menganalisis isu rasuah untuk meyakinkan menunjukkan kedudukannya dari sudut moral pandangan.

_________________________________________________________________________ MUKA SURAT TAMAT / END OF PAGE

ATTACHMENT ASSIGNMENT RUBRICS

OUMM2103/ ENTREPRENUERSHIP /MAY 2013

Criteria

Weig ht

Low 0 1

Fair 2

Above average 3

Excellent 4

Max Mark s

Introduction Definition, history and practice of bribery Pengenalan - Definisi, Sejarah dan amalan rasuah 1

A write-up on bribery was not provided.

The write-up was brief, unclear and lacks depth.

The write-up was brief and clear but without reference to any reputable source.

The write-up was adequate and clear, but without any reference to reputable sources.

Economic analysis on the act of bribery Analisis ekonomi ke atas perbuatan rasuah

2.5

No economic analysis was carried out.

Arguments were not based on microeconomic theories and market forces.

Arguments were based on microeconomic theories and market forces but incomplete and/or irrelevant.

Arguments were based on microeconomic theories and market forces and were adequate and clear.

The write-up was detailed and clear with adequate references from reputable sources. Penulisan adalah terperinci dan jelas dengan rujukan yang mencukupi daripada sumbersumber yang berwibawa. Arguments were based on microeconomic theories and market forces and were very clear and detailed. Some cost/benefit data illustrations were given. Hujah-hujah yang berdasarkan teori-teori mikroekonomi dan kuasa pasaran dan sangat jelas dan terperinci.

10

Sesetengah kos / faedah data ilustrasi diberikan.

Legal analysis on the act of bribery Analisis undangundang ke atas perbuatan rasuah 2.5

No legal analysis was carried out.

Arguments were not based on the legal framework and social forces.

Arguments were based on the legal framework and social forces but incomplete/ irrelevant.

Arguments were based on the legal framework and social forces and were adequate and clear.

Arguments based on the legal framework and social forces were clear and detailed. Hujah-hujah yang berdasarkan rangka kerja undang-undang dan kuasa-kuasa sosial adalah jelas dan terperinci. Arguments based on FOUR ethical theories were soundly presented. Hujah-hujah yang berdasarkan rangka kerja undang-undang dan kuasa-kuasa sosial adalah jelas dan terperinci. The conclusion on the outcome of the analysis was detailed and complete. Kesimpulan mengenai hasil analisis adalah 10

Ethical analysis on the act of bribery Analisis etika dalam perbuatan rasuah

No ethical analysis was carried out. 2.5

Arguments based on ONE ethical theory were soundly presented.

Arguments based on TWO ethical theories were soundly presented.

Arguments based on THREE ethical theories were soundly presented.

10

Conclusion kesimpulan

1.5

No conclusion was provided on the outcome of the analysis.

The conclusion on the outcome of the analysis was vague and/or irrelevant.

The conclusion on the outcome of the analysis was partially complete.

The conclusion on the outcome of the analysis was adequate.

terperinci dan lengkap.

Total points

10

40