Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 10

DRAFT AGENDA as of 5/4/04

FOR INTERNAL USE ONL Y

NATIONAL COMMISSION ON TERRORIST ATTACKS UPON THE UNITED STATES


TWELFTH PUBLIC HEARING • JUNE 8-9,2004
NTSB BOARDROOM • 490 L'ENFANT PLAZA, SW • WASHINGTON, DC

THE 9/11 PLOT

TUESDAY, JUNE 8

8:30-9:00 a.m. STAFF STATEMENT NO. \f>


Overview of the Enemy

9:00 - 10:30 a.m. PANEL: ALQAEDA

AH Soufan
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy

Patrick Fitzgerald

1 0:30 -11:30 a.m. STAFF STATEMENT NO. if


Outline of the 9/11 Plot 9/l Law Enforcement Privacy

1 1 :30 - 12:30 p.m.

12:30- 1:00 p.m. BREAK

1 :00 - 2:00 p.m. Saudi Panel

2:00 - 2:30 p.m. /"STAFF STATEMENT NO.


Plot Problems

2:30-3:30 p.m. | I
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
I I

3:30 ~ 4:00 p.m. STAFF STATEMENT NO. if


Domestic Support Network?

4:00-5:00 p.m. John Pistole


/r
AQ
11-30-12:15

9/U Law Enforcement Privacy

3-% SuMt Ml^y-^C-/^^;-


/o

-Svn«|UXT?Lf 0002.
Hearing, June 8-9,2004

June 8 Hearing

The 9/11 Plot

Tuesday, June 8

9:00-9:30 a.m. Staff Statement


Overview of the Enemy (Team 1)

9:30-11:00 a.m. Panel: Al Qaeda (Team 1)

Witnesses: Ali Soufan


9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy

Patrick Fitzgerald

11:00 a.m.-12:30 p.m. Staff Statement


Outline of the 9/11 Plot (Team 1 A)
(include computer presentation)

12:30-1:00 p.m. Staff Statement


Plot Problems (Team 1A)

1:00-2:00 p.m. Break

2:00-4:00 p.m. Panel: The Plot and the Plotters (Team 1 A)

Witnesses: DRG witness


CTC witness
Aaron Zebley
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy

4:00-4:30 p.m. Staff Statement


A Domestic Support Network? (Team 1A)
Hearing, June 8-9,2004

June 8 Hearing

The 9/11 Plot

Tuesday, June 8

9:00-9:30 a.m. Staff Statement


Overview of the Enemy (Team 1)

9:30-11:00 a.m. Panel: Al Qaeda (Team 1)

Witnesses: Ali Soufan


9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy

Patrick Fitzgerald

11:00 a.m.-12:30 p.m. Staff Statement


Outline of the 9/11 Plot (Team 1A)
(include computer presentation)

12:30-1:00 p.m. Staff Statement


Plot Problems (Team 1 A)

1:00-2:00 p.m. Break

2:00-4:00 p.m. Panel: The Plot and the Plotters (Team 1A)

Witnesses: DRG witness


CTC witness
Aaron Zeblev
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy

4:00-4:30 p.m. Staff Statement


A Domestic Support Network? (Team 1 A)

Witness/panel possibilities:
Krauss
Flight instructors
Team 1A Hearing Proposal

Panel One: Evolution of the Plot


Witnesses: CTC and DRG

Panel Two: The Hamburg Cell


Witnesses: CIA and FBI (Zebley)

Panel Three: Hijackers Activities in the United States


Witnesses: FBI Penttbom

Panel Four: Disobedience, Disagreement, and Dissent


Witnesses: DRG

Scope
Timing
Targets
Alternate Hijackers

Individual Profiles
Recruitment

Contrast Pilots with NAH, KAM, and HH

NAH and KAM Disobedience


Internal Disagreement
Leadership Dissent
I
9/11 Closed by Statute

-/WW»»s,
9/11 Classified Information

9/11 Closed by S t a t u t e

Team 1A Hearing Proposal

Panel Ones: Evolution of the Plot

Witnesses: ClA

Staff Statement #1:

• Scope of the 9/11 operation: 10 planes, SE Asia component,, second wave


• Timing of the attacks: postponements, UBL wanting to hurry \
• Targets: initial list of possibilities, UBL/Atta dynamic, WH/Congress
• Alternate Hijackers: list of btw 8-12 suspected dropouts, reasons why

Basic Idea: This panel would allow us to explore a variety of topics illustrating how the
"planes operation" was not rigidly conceived or even executed, but rather how the plan
constantly evolved from its inception into what the public knows of the attacks.

Panel Two: A Global Conspiracy

Witnesses: CIA (CTC) and FB] |

Staff Statement #2:

• Overview of leadership (Afghanistan, Pakistan), facilitators (Pakistan, UAE), and


operatives (Germany, Saudi Arabia, U.S)
• Structure of conspiracy (Binalshibh as link btw operatives and leadership, etc)
• Means (phone, email, couriers) and mode (codes, etc) of communication and
financing (travelers checks, wire transfers, cash, etc)
• Contrast between German pilots and West Coast crew/in the U.S.

Basic Idea: This panel would allow us to frame the 9/11 conspiracy as one that spanned
at least three continents and to cohesively explain how the Various parts of the conspiracy
interacted across the globe (in terms of direction, communication, and financing).

Panel Three: Hijackers Activities in the United States

Witnesses: FBI Penttbom (Jackie Maguire, Jim Fitzgerald^

Basic Idea: This panel would be covered under Staff Statement #2 and would allow us to
focus on the domestic elements of the 9/11 operation / namely how there were really two
cadres of operatives in the U.S. (Atta/Hazmi) with totally different MOs.

9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy


Panel Four: Disobedience, Disagreement, and Dissent

Witnesses: CIA (CTC and DRG)

Staff Statement #3:

• Hazmi and Midhar as experienced but not disciplined operatives (Midhar did not
train with KSM, both went to Bagkok, Midhar left the U.S. without permission)
• Internal disagreements: Atta and Jarrah (detainee reporting and IMs)
• Dissent among al Qaeda leadership: Shura council division over 9/11 attacks
» UBL as W ihwrtt3 deoiwyitfiaW,- troublesome 0p&rahves sUy in -toe plot/ (Mack
Basic Idea: This panel would allow us to challenge the well-publicized paradigm of the When h£ w
9/11 conspirators as a coherent, unified, and totally disciplined group. As we now know,
there were several times when not everybody was on the same page, from the operatives
to the pilots, and even among the al Qaeda leadership.
WITH DRAWAL NOTICE

RG: 148
Box: 00018 Folder: 0052 Document: 3
Series: Team 1A Files

Copies: 1 Pages: 1

ACCESS RESTRICTED

The item identified below has been withdrawn from this file:

Folder Title: Hearing Agendas


Document Date:
Document Type: Draft
Special Media:
From:
To:

Subject: draft of page from Final Report

In the review of this file this item was removed because access to it is
restricted. Restrictions on records in the National Archives are stated in
general and specific record group restriction statements which are available
for examination.

NND: 341
Withdrawn: 08-19-2008 by:

RETRIEVAL #: 341 00018 0052 3


System DocID: 3952

l/UMsMrt-w

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi