Case3:10-cv-05449-RS Document181 Filed06/06/13 Page1 of 6

1 K&L GATES LLP Michael J. Bettinger (Bar No. 122196) 2 mike.bettinger@klgates.com Stephen M. Everett (Bar No. 121619) 3 stephen.everett@klgates.com Curt Holbreich (Bar No. 168053) 4 curt.holbreich@klgates.com Elaine Y. Chow (State Bar No. 194063) 5 elaine.chow@klgates.com Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200 6 San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel: (415) 882-8200 7 Fax: (415) 882-8220 8 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 9 Sean Pak (Bar No. 219032) seanpak@quinnemanuel.com 10 Peter A. Klivans (Bar No. 236673) peterklivans@quinnemanuel.com 11 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California 94111-4788 12 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 13 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 14 SULLIVAN, LLP Michael D. Powell (Bar No. 202850) 15 mikepowell@quinnemanuel.com 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5 th Floor 16 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 17 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 18 Attorneys for Defendants & Counterclaimants STMICROELECTRONICS N.V. and 19 STMICROELECTRONICS INC. 20 21 RAMBUS INC., 22 Plaintiff, 23 vs. 24 STMICROELECTRONICS N.V.; 25 STMICROELECTRONICS INC., 26 27 28
04395.52001/5354759.1

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Thomas D. Pease (admitted pro hac vice) thomaspease@quinnemanuel.com 51 Madison Avenue, 22 nd Floor New York, NY 10010 Telephone: (212) 849-7000 Facsimile: (212) 849-7100 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Robert J. Becher (Bar No. 193431) robertbecher@quinnemanuel.com 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 443-3000 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CASE NO. C 10-05449 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF STMICROELECTRONICS N.V. AND STMICROELECTRONICS INC. FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ESTABLISHING CERTAIN FINDINGS REGARDING RAMBUS S UNCLEAN HANDS Date: July 11, 2013 Time: 1:30 pm Crtrm.: Courtroom 3, 17th Floor
Case No. Case No. C 10-05449 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF STMICROELECTRONICS N.V. AND STMICROELECTRONICS INC. FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendants.

Case3:10-cv-05449-RS Document181 Filed06/06/13 Page2 of 6

Defendants STMicroelectronics N.V. and STMicroelectronics Inc. (STMicro)

2 respectfully request that the Court take judicial notice pursuant to Rule 201 of the Federal Rules of 3 Evidence of certain documents cited in STMicros Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 4 Establishing Certain Findings Regarding Rambuss Unclean Hands Based on Collateral Estoppel. 5 In connection with the hearing on this motion scheduled for July 11, 2013, STMicro hereby 6 requests pursuant to Rule 201 of the Federal Rules of Evidence that this Court take judicial notice 7 of the existence of the following documents attached to the Declaration of Robert J. Becher in 8 Support of STMicro's Notice of Motion and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Establishing 9 Certain Findings Regarding Rambuss Unclean Hands Based on Collateral Estoppel , filed 10 herewith:1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
1

EXHIBIT A.

Joint List of Admitted Exhibits Unclean Hands Trial, dated December 6, 2007, in Micron Technology, Inc. v. Rambus Inc ., Case No. 00-792 (D. Del.) action (Micron action).

EXHIBIT B.

Excerpts from the reporters transcript of the Micron action on November 8, 2007.

EXHIBIT C.

Excerpts from the reporters transcript of the Micron action on November 9, 2007.

EXHIBIT D.

Excerpts from the reporters transcript of the Micron action on November 13, 2007.

EXHIBIT E.

Excerpts from the reporters transcript of the Micron action on November 14, 2007.

EXHIBIT F.

Excerpts from the reporters transcript of the Micron action on November 15, 2007.

EXHIBIT G.

Excerpts from deposition testimony designated pursuant to court order in the Micron action.

Exhibit numbering in this request is not always consecutive so as to match the exhibit 27 numbering in the Declaration of Robert J. Becher In Support of STMicro's Notice of Motion and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Establishing Certain Findings Reg arding Rambuss 28 Unclean Hands Based on Collateral Estoppel.
04395.52001/5354759.1

Case No. Case No. C 10-05449 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF STMICROELECTRONICS N.V. AND STMICROELECTRONICS INC. FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Case3:10-cv-05449-RS Document181 Filed06/06/13 Page3 of 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
04395.52001/5354759.1

EXHIBIT H.

Judgment in a Civil Case, dated February 25, 2013 from the Micron action.

EXHIBIT I. EXHIBIT M.

Rambuss Notice of Appeal, dated March 28, 2013 in the Micron action. Excerpts from the reporters transcript of the trial on October 17, 2005 in Hynix Semiconductor Inc., et al v. Rambus Inc ., Case No. 00-20905 (N.D. Cal..) action (Hynix action).

EXHIBIT N.

Excerpts from the reporters transcript of the Hynix action on October 18, 2005.

EXHIBIT O.

Excerpts from the reporters transcript of the Hynix action on October 19, 2005.

EXHIBIT P.

Excerpts from the reporters transcript of the Hynix action on October 24, 2005.

EXHIBIT Q.

Excerpts from the reporters transcript of the Hynix action on October 25, 2005.

EXHIBIT R.

Excerpts from the reporters transcript of the Hynix action on October 26, 2005.

EXHIBIT S.

Excerpts from the reporters transcript of the Hynix action on October 27, 2005.

EXHIBIT T.

Excerpts from the reporters transcript of the Hynix action on October 28, 2005.

EXHIBIT U.

Excerpts from the reporters transcript o f the Hynix action on October 31, 2005.

EXHIBIT V.

Excerpts from the reporters transcript of the Hynix action on November 1, 2005.

EXHIBIT W. EXHIBIT FF.

Verdict Form from Hynix action, dated April 24, 2006. May 23, 2013 Nonconfidential Brief for Appellant Rambus Inc. in Rambus, Inc. v. ITC, Case No. 2012-1677, before the Federal Circuit.

Case No. Case No. C 10-05449 -3REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF STMICROELECTRONICS N.V. AND STMICROELECTRONICS INC. FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Case3:10-cv-05449-RS Document181 Filed06/06/13 Page4 of 6

1 2 3 4 5 6

EXHIBIT GG.

March 2, 2012 Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337 and Recommended Determination on Remedy and Bond in ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-753 (Public version).

EXHIBIT HH.

July 31, 2012 Commission Opinion in ITC Investigation No. 337-TA753 (Public version).

Courts may take judicial notice of adjudicative facts not subject to reasonable dispute

7 because [they] . . . can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot 8 reasonably be questioned. Fed. R. Civ. P. 201. The documents for whi ch the STMicro seeks 9 judicial notice are court records from other district courts and administrative public records from 10 ITC proceedings. As such, they are adjudicative facts of related judicial and administrative 11 proceedings, the existence of which cannot be reasonably disputed. 12 Courts routinely take judicial notice of filings, pleadings, and other adjudicative facts from

13 parallel proceedings, not limited to proceedings of the federal judiciary. See United States ex rel. 14 Robinson Rancheria Citizens Council v. Borneo, Inc. , 971 F.2d 244, 248 (9th Cir. 1992) 15 ([Courts] may take notice of proceedings in other courts, both within and without the federal 16 judicial system, if th ose proceedings have a direct relation to matters at issue.) (ci tations omitted); 17 see also Reyns Pasta Bella, LLC v. Visa USA, Inc. , 442 F.3d 741, 746 n.6 (9th Cir. 2006). For 18 example, in Bonnel v. Best Buy Stores, this district court held that judicial notice of orders and 19 filings in another action was appropriate because the requested documents are from sources 20 whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned, as they were filed in the Eastern District of 21 California, and are also a matter of public record. Bonnel v. Best Buy Stores, 881 F. Supp. 2d 22 1164, 1168 (N.D. Cal. 2012). Therefore, it is appropriate for this Court to take judicial notice of 23 trial transcripts, orders, and other court materials from the Micron and Hynix cases. 24 In addition, orders and judgments in administrative actions have been held to be proper

25 subjects of judicial notice. Papai v. Harbor Tug & Barge Co., 67 F.3d 203, 207 n.5 (9th Cir. 26 1995), revd on other grounds, 520 U.S. 548 (1997) (taking judicial notice of administrative law 27 judges order in different proceedings based on same accident; prop er to take notice of orders and 28 decisions of other courts and agencies). See also, Merced Irr. District v. County of Mariposa , --04395.52001/5354759.1

Case No. Case No. C 10-05449 -4REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF STMICROELECTRONICS N.V. AND STMICROELECTRONICS INC. FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Case3:10-cv-05449-RS Document181 Filed06/06/13 Page5 of 6

1 F. Supp. 2d ---, 2013 WL 1749904 at *20 (E.D. Cal. April 23, 2013) ([R]ecords and reports of 2 administrative bodies are proper subjects of judicial notice, so long as their authenticity or 3 accuracy is not disputed.). Therefore, it is appropriate for the Court to take judicial notice of the 4 administrative decisions from ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-753. 5 Because the authenticity of the materials as to which judicial notice is requested herein is

6 not subject to reasonable dispute under Rule 201, the Court may take judicial notice of these 7 relevant documents. STMicro bases this request on this pleading, all papers and pleadings on file 8 in this action, and on such further argument and evidence as the Court may consider. 9 10 Dated: 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
04395.52001/5354759.1

June 6, 2013

/s/ Michael J. Bettinger Michael J. Bettinger Stephen M. Everett Curt Holbreich Elaine Y. Chow K&L GATES LLP Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200 San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel.: (415) 882-8200 Fax: (415) 882-8220 Sean S. Pak Peter Klivans Q UINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel.: (415) 875-6600 Fax: (415) 875-6700 Robert J. Becher Q UINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 865 S. Figueroa St., 10F Los Angeles, CA 90017 Tel.: (213) 443-3000 Fax: (213) 443-3100 Attorneys for Defendants STMicroelectronics N.V. and STMicroelectronics Inc.

Case No. Case No. C 10-05449 -5REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF STMICROELECTRONICS N.V. AND STMICROELECTRONICS INC. FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Case3:10-cv-05449-RS Document181 Filed06/06/13 Page6 of 6

1 2

E-FILING ATTESTATION I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a

3 "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

04395.52001/5354759.1

/s/ Peter Klivans Peter Klivans

Case No. Case No. C 10-05449 -6REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF STMICROELECTRONICS N.V. AND STMICROELECTRONICS INC. FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT