MAPPING A MASTERWORK: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF GENE WOLFE S THE BOOK OF THE NEW SUN Volume One: Shadow and

Claw Volume Two: Sword and Citadel (Millennium, 2000) Reviewed by Peter Wright Long before its inclusion on Millennium s SF Masterworks list, Gene Wolfe s densely allusive four volume The Book of the New Sun (The Shadow of the Torturer (1980), The Claw of the Conciliator (1981), The Sword of the Lictor (1981) and The Cita del of the Autarch (1983)) was acclaimed as one of science fiction s masterpieces . U niversally praised, each volume won at least one of sf s most coveted awards: The Shadow of the Torturer took the Howard Memorial Award and the World Fantasy Awar d in 1981, and the British Science Fiction Award in 1982; The Claw of the Concil iator brought Wolfe his second Nebula Award in 1981, whilst Locus honoured the n ovel with its Best Fantasy Novel Award in 1982; The Sword of the Lictor received the British Fantasy Award for Best Novel in 1983; and The Citadel of the Autarc h took the John W. Campbell Memorial Award in 1984. Critics and reviewers were unrestrained. The Book of the New Sun was applauded i n a variety of periodicals ranging from The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fict ion to Isaac Asimov s Science Fiction Magazine to The Library Journal and The New York Times. In short, it became a publishing event, the repercussions of which w ere felt in fanzines, journals and mainstream publications alike. It was acclaim ed widely for its imaginative fertility, its formidable characterisation, its co ntrolled and meticulous style, and the craftsmanship of its construction. Colin Greenland, reviewing The Shadow of the Torturer and The Claw of the Conciliator for Foundation provides a somewhat restrained endorsement when he considers the texts as the next classic sf sequence, on a par with Earthsea, the Titus Groan Bo oks or even the Foundation Trilogy. 1 However, embedded within this, and more extra vagant praise, was a burgeoning paradox. On the one hand, critics like Michael B ishop were lauding The Shadow of the Torturer for being: an immediately accessible book for anyone with moderate intelligence and the abi lity to read. (Certainly it does not present some of the problems of interpretat ion that The Fifth Head of Cerberus has posed for wary and unwary alike.) 2 Conversely, Algis Budrys was expressing a growing scepticism as the tetralogy sa w print. Whilst recognising that the publication of The Book of the New Sun was a seminal event in the history of science fiction, Budrys gave voice to his growin g suspicion that the narrative might not be as straightforward as it first appea red: I am in the presence of a practitioner whose moves I cannot follow; I see only t he same illusions that are seen by those outside the guild [of writers]. I know the cards are up the sleeves somewhere, but there are clearly extra arms to this person. 3 The image of Wolfe as illusionist and card-sharp is accurate and one which criti cs would adopt as they began to share Budrys sense of deception. Colin Greenland, in his tellingly entitled article, Wolfe in Sheep s Clothing , observes: Wolfe is subtle as well as bold, lavish with sly puzzles, mysteries and revelati ons that have had more than one reader waking up in the middle of the night sayi ng, My God, it can t be! But it is. Second and third readings are indicated. 4 The feeling of having been duped by Wolfe led Baird Searles to suggest the origi n of this critical discomfort and pose a provocative question:

The Book of the New Sun is too complex a work to evaluate on one reading. It wil l undoubtedly be considered a landmark in the field, one that perhaps marks the turning point of science fiction from content to style, from matter to manner. M annered it certainly is, and stylish; [but] under all that glittering edifice of surprising words and more surprising events and characters, is there a story or a concept of any stature? 5 Twenty years after the publication of The Shadow of the Torturer and four years after completing a Ph.D. that attempted to answer Searles question, the reprintin g of The Book of the New Sun provides me with an opportunity for a retrospective view. Indeed, everything about the new SF Masterwork s edition invites retrospect ion, from the Jim Burns cover of Shadow and Claw itself a homage to Bruce Pennin gton s evocative, eroded image on the first UK edition to the very term Masterwork hat appears several times on the jacket. Whilst the SF Masterworks imprint is ju st that, an imprint packaged to sell books under a grandiose banner, there is a strong case to be made for considering The Book of the New Sun as a masterwork . Although Searles prophesied that The Book of the New Sun was certainly the sort o f novel that will provide a field day for critics, essayists, people who make li sts, analysers, and academics , his prophecy has gone largely unfulfilled, with th e notable exception of Michael Andre-Driussi s commendable Lexicon Urthus (1994). 6 Consequently, any claims made for viewing Wolfe s tetralogy as a masterpiece are somewhat flimsy and subjective. Rather than engaging with the text to any meani ngful degree, critics have tended to extol The Book of the New Sun for its fluid ity of style, the conception of its enigmatic, alien Earth, and the depth of its characterisation. This conventional, narrow and unimaginative approach was unsa tisfactory in 1983 and will remain so until readers take up the gauntlet Wolfe t hrows at their feet. Clearly, it is impossible to provide satisfactory justification for considering The Book of the New Sun a masterwork in the space of a short review or to anticipa te Attending Daedalus: Gene Wolfe, Artifice and the Reader, my own study of Wolf e s fiction to be published by Liverpool University Press in 2001. However, it is possible to suggest criteria that would enable critics to qualify Wolfe s beguilin g, manipulative text as a masterwork if they are prepared to face the intellectual challenge. On a first, superficial reading, there is little to distinguish Wolfe s tetralogy from many other sf and fantasy novels, with the exception of the aforementioned xenography, or world building, the credible characters and the polished, literat e style. The plot itself is apparently unremarkable. Set on the ancient world of Urth, under the roseate glow of a dying sun, The Book of the New Sun is the mem oir of Severian, an apprentice torturer exiled from his guild for showing mercy to a condemned client with whom he had fallen in love. Leaving the sprawling and m anifestly ancient city of Nessus, Severian begins his phantasmagoric journey nor th to Thrax, the City of Windowless Rooms, where he is to act as Lictor to the A rchon. Once in Thrax, he refuses to murder a faithless wife for the Archon and m ust flee ever northwards. Eventually, he finds himself on battlefields scarred b y the constant war between Severian s Commonwealth and the armies of the northern continent, Ascia. It is here that he encounters the Autarch, ruler of the Common wealth, who nominates Severian as his successor. The Citadel of the Autarch conc ludes with Severian awaiting judgement on the world of Yesod, where the Hierogra mmates will assess his worthiness as the epitome of Urth. If he succeeds in his trial, Urth will receive a new sun; if he fails, he will be emasculated and cond emn his world to entropic dissolution. Wolfe picks up the story at this point in the sequel to the tetralogy, The Urth of the New Sun (1987). Throughout Severian s journey, there are moments of creative brilliance: Severian s unwitting resurrection of Dorcas at the Lake of Birds; his bizarre duel with Agilu s; the chilling execution of Morwenna; his incarceration in the House Absolute;

Dr. Talos allegorical and metafictive play, Eschatology and Genesis ; Severian s encou nter with the alzabo and, later, with Typhon, the two-headed tyrant whose legacy is felt again in The Book of the Long Sun; the apocalyptic battle between the C ommonwealth and Ascia; the final meeting between Severian and the Autarch; and t he revelations provided by the aquastor of Master Malrubius that recontextualise the entire narrative. Each of these encounters provides the reader with an indication of the story tha t can be reconstructed from the plot. Reconciling plot with story, perceiving th e text not as the religious document it purports to be but as the product of a m anipulated individual caught in the Hierogrammates evolutionary machinations (som ething made explicit in The Urth of the New Sun) is the first step towards under standing Wolfe s strategies and purpose. The gulf between plot and story, between the apparent and the real, alerts the reader to the fact that Wolfe is playing a complex and contrived textual game that facilitates a number of methods of inte rpretation. Coming to understand The Book of the New Sun is like learning the rules of a gam e. If the reader succeeds in perceiving the rules of Wolfe s literary game, achiev es the reconciliation of plot with story, then the experience of reading becomes an educational one. By stimulating the reader to reject primary assumptions and existing preconceptions, Wolfe not only lifts the reader onto a level of alertn ess that allows for his most subtle effects, but also reveals to the more cautio us reader how they ascribe meaning to a text. This is, perhaps, the most fundame ntal factor in any claim that The Book of the New Sun is a masterwork : it encourag es the growth of the reader towards what Jonathan Culler terms literary competenc e .7 In short, Wolfe organises the text to be understood only by those readers wil ling to question their own literary assumptions, pause, reflect, and reread. The literary game Wolfe constructs is most notable in terms of textual structure . Wolfe s presentation of his rational sf novel as a non-rational fantasy, togethe r with his subversion of the Campbellian heroic cycle, provide an insight not on ly into the possibilities of the genre but also into how habitual modes of readi ng inform and construct the reader s reception of a text. Of course, there are a n umber of novels that achieve this synthesis and/or recontextualisation, which al one is insufficient to distinguish The Book of the New Sun. However, for Wolfe, the recontextualisation is little more than a starting point for his wider conce rns. He is not necessarily preoccupied with demonstrating how proficient he is a s a writer. Rather, by effectively concealing his narratological sleight of hand and constructing a puzzle for his reader, Wolfe attempts to alert that reader t o the level of perception required. Hence, The Book of the New Sun does not invi te the reader to marvel at how clever Wolfe can be, but to marvel at his or her own intelligence in perceiving one facet of the elaborate textual game the autho r plays. In this sense, Wolfe s tetralogy is a masterwork in that it can be read a s a paraliterary fantasy but demands to be read as a comment upon, and a reactio n to, such narratives. In effect, it is a coolly intellectual denunciation of pa ssive reading practices, a clarion call to readers dulled by formula fiction. Similarly, Wolfe s deployment of a first person narrator and the autobiographical form confronts the reader with familiar paradigms that oppose the reader s recepti on of the subtle subversions Wolfe works on their conventions. As other critics have noted, without realising the implications of their observations, Severian i s one of the most detailed and complex characterisations found in contemporary l iterature. He is also the principal means by which Wolfe distracts the reader fr om apprehending the story of his text. Despite appearances to the contrary, Seve rian is an unreliable narrator and not only because he tells lies detectable by the cautious reader. Ironically, Severian is unreliable because of the very char acteristic that makes him appear wholly reliable: his eidetic memory. Although W olfe provides indicators of Severian s fallibility, it is his status as a mnemonis t that marks Severian as someone who cannot be trusted. As a mnemonist, he is ch

aracterised by a passive-receptive attitude that precludes organised striving, b y limitations of intellect concealed behind his capacity for thought and imagina tion, and by his tendency to be a dreamer whose fantasies constitute another wor ld through which he transforms his everyday experiences. Even the concealment of the story driving the plot of The Book of the New Sun is explicable in terms of Severian s characterisation, given that mnemonists have a tendency to remember a wealth of detail (plot) which scatters meaning (story). Wolfe provides clues to Severian s inconscience to borrow a term from Henry James on a number of occasions, provoking the reader to see beyond the masquerade to what lies beneath. In this way, Wolfe not only asks his reader to question the narrator s reception and inter pretation of events, but their own reception and interpretation of the text. Whilst the reader is attempting to decode what is actually occurring in The Book of the New Sun, Wolfe elaborates his textual games-playing by introducing signi ficant levels unfamiliar diction, designed to convey the flavour of an odd place at an odd time. 8 This apparently innocuous comment obfuscates the fact that desp ite the conceptual, allusive and thematic functions served by words like peltast , o ptimates , carnifex and so forth, Wolfe is deliberately opening his text to post-str ucturalist analyses. In his appendix to The Shadow of the Torturer, Wolfe invest s his diction with an enforced polysemy when he explains that the obscure nouns found in his translation of The Book of the New Sun are intended to be suggestive r ather than definitive . 9 In this appendix, which, in a typical inversion, reads more like an introduction , Wolfe destabilises the status of his language; previously concrete nouns have their unequivocal meanings subverted by his translation ; they become indeterminate substitutions . Accordingly, by destabilising the meaning of his signifiers, Wolfe ensures that his narrative can be perceived as a writerly text in the Barthesia n sense of containing indeterminacy of meaning.10 Thus, The Book of the New Sun may appeal to a post-structuralist reading as it marks a shift from meaning to s taging, from the signified to the signifier. It fractures the relationship betwe en the stable sign and the unified subject. Equally, the text s obscure diction in vites any deconstruction-orientated approach by showing a limitlessness of lingu istic play, a drive or drift of meaning. Equally, reader response critics can inv oke Wolfgang Iser s gap theory to discuss the spots of indeterminism created by Wolf e s indeterminate nouns.11 These critical approaches, all of which were prevalent before and during the publication of The Book of the New Sun, are a part of Wolf e s intellectual gamesmanship. The reader should not be fooled, however. As Severi an states early in the narrative, rational people know that things act of themsel ves or not at all ,12 that is, they act in context, in harmony with their own natu re, regardless of their name or terminology. Ironically, then, The Book of the N ew Sun can be claimed as a masterwork because it both acknowledges and denies the validity of critical theory. Whilst it permits, and even invites, post-structura list or deconstructivist approaches, which would provide one form of insight int o the text, it undermines the potential of such analyses by indicating the conte xtualising story that reveals how things act of themselves. Theoretical approaches , Wolfe seems to be suggesting, will generate interpretations, but a more holist ic understanding will only follow from personal and untheorised reflection. Similar observations could be made regarding Wolfe s deployment of metafictional d evices. Not content with changing generic codes, subverting literary conventions , employing an unreliable narrator, and exploiting the deflective effect of the unfamiliar, Wolfe manipulates traditional metafictional strategies. These device s are used to create a confusing series of connections between the text and its hermeneutic circle, between the action of its heavily intertextual hypodiegetic tales and that of the main narrative. Critics have largely overlooked the metafi ctional aspects of the text and the purpose they serve. This oversight, which wo uld have exposed the text s self-reflexive preoccupation with itself, arises from the fact that Wolfe and his commentators, including John Clute and Joan Gordon, have their creative and analytical powers concentrated in opposite directions. W

here Wolfe turns his attention inward to fabricate a lengthy and involved puzzle for his reader, his critics have peered outwards from the text, searching for a point where The Book of the New Sun correlates with life itself. Accordingly, t hey have failed to appreciate that the metaphorical significance of the text (it s examination of faith and deception) is sustained and deepened by the game Wolf e initiates with the reader. It is only by observing how s/he has been deceived and cajoled that the reader comes to appreciate more fully Wolfe s vision of human ity as a helplessly subjective species attendant to the whim of manipulatory for ces. This observation is encouraged by the self-conscious stress on deception, a rtifice and artificiality that permeates the text and which emblematises Wolfe s t extual game with the reader. It could be argued that The Book of the New Sun is science fiction s Ulysses. Like James Joyce, Wolfe has put in so many enigmas and puzzles that it will keep prof essors busy for centuries over what I meant, and that s the only way of ensuring o ne s immortality. 13 However, to do so would be to deny Wolfe s determination to wed the reading process with his particular conception of existence through his game s playing. From his other fiction, it apparent that Wolfe perceives the world as an ambiguous round of perceptions and misperceptions in which the individual st ruggles, and ultimately fails, to apprehend the precise nature of existence. The senses form a barrier to understanding; the memory an unreliable recording devi ce to which the individual must return for clues to the conundrum of life; the w orld a system of manipulation where in people must live as best they can accordi ng to their physical, psychological and social restrictions. Whilst it could be argued that the literary importance of Wolfe s fiction derives from the thematic integrity by which this vision is conveyed, it is, perhaps, mo re pertinent to argue that the real strength of his work arises from his ability to make the reader experience this conception of existence during the reading p rocess. Accordingly, throughout The Book of the New Sun, habitual modes of readi ng become metaphors for systems of manipulation and deception; unreliable narrat ors emphasise the reader s own subjectivity; and unfamiliar diction calls into que stion the accuracy with which we can perceive the actuality of the real . Like the constriction in an hourglass, The Book of the New Sun marks the point a t which, and from which, Wolfe s themes, techniques and preoccupations converge an d diverge. To understand it is to understand Wolfe s oeuvre entire. Yet, it is muc h more than that. The Book of the New Sun reminds us of our potential and our vu lnerability as readers and, in so doing, it reminds us of our potential and vuln erability as individuals. Through each reading of the text we learn not only wha t it is to read, perceptively and critically, but also what it is to live, perce ptively and critically, in the world. Every reading is, then, an individual resu rrection. For that reason, if for no other, Gene Wolfe s The Book of the New Sun d eserves to be hailed as a masterwork and not just a masterwork of science fictio n but a considerable achievement within twentieth century fiction itself. * * * * * Footnotes 1. Colin Greenland, review of The Shadow of the Torturer and The Claw of the Con ciliator, Foundation, 24 (1982), 82-85 (p. 85). 2. Michael Bishop, Pitching Pennies Against the Starboard Bulkhead: Gene Wolfe as Hero , Thrust: Science Fiction in Review, Fall 1980, pp. 10-12 (p. 12). 3. Algis Budrys, review of The Claw of the Conciliator, Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, June 1980, p. 49. 4. Colin Greenland, Wolfe in Sheep s Clothing , City Limits, 21-27 October 1983, p. 1

7. 5. Baird Searles, review of The Citadel of the Autarch, Isaac Asimov s Science Fic tion Magazine, May 1983, p. 167. 6. Ibid. 7. Jonathan Culler, Literary Competence in Reader Response Criticism from Formalis m to Post-Structuralism, ed. by Jane P. Tompkins (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Unive rsity Press, 1980), pp. 101-117. 8. Gene Wolfe, Castle of Days (New York: Tor, 1992) p. 236. 9. Gene Wolfe, The Shadow of the Torturer (London: Arrow, 1981), p. 302. 10. Roland Barthes, From Work to Text in Textual Strategies: Perspectives in PostStructuralist Criticism, ed. by Joshu V. Harari (New York: Cornell University Pre ss, 1979), pp. 73-81. 11. Wolfgang Iser, The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response, trans. by The Johns Hopkins University Press (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul), p. 24. 12. Ibid., p. 17. 13. James Joyce, cited in Frank Kermode, The Genesis of Secrecy (Harvard: Harvar d University Press, 1979), p. 64. 5 COMMENTS / POSTED IN: BOOK OF THE NEW SU