Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 131

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 1

Q.4. How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with your local area as a place to live?
Base : All Respondents

Student residence
Total
(z)
Total
Very satisfied

165
72
44%d

Fairly satisfied

84
51%gln

On campus
(a)
100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study
1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

65*

64*

41*

45*

15**

33*

45
45%

27
42%

32

21
47%

7
47%

20

50%d

12
29%

49
49%

35
54%

30
47%

24
59%

23
51%

7
47%

11
33%

61%zh

Uni of Kent
(h)
128

Other uni
(i)

Satisfied
(j)

Dissatisfied
(k)

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

Oppose
(o)

4**

156

6**

118

18**

104

21**

51
40%

1
25%

72

59

54

50%z

5
28%

52%z

7
33%

70

3
75%

84

55%g

51
43%

13
72%

43
41%

14
67%

46%z
54%z

Neither satisfied nor


dissatisfied

3
2%

3
3%

1
2%

2
5%

1
3%

2
2%

2
2%

2
2%

Fairly dissatisfied

6
4%j

3
3%

3
5%

1
2%

3
7%

1
2%

1
7%

1
3%

5
4%

6
100%

6
5%

5
5%

Very dissatisfied

No opinion/ Don't know

156
95%

94
94%

62
95%

62
97%

36
88%

44
98%

14
93%

31
94%

121
95%

4
100%

156
100%z

110
93%

18
100%

97
93%

21
100%

3
3%

3
5%

1
2%

3
7%

1
2%

1
7%

1
3%

5
4%

6
100%

6
5%

5
5%

91
91%

59
91%

13
87%

30
91%

116
91%

156

-6
-100%

104
88%

18
100%

92
88%

21
100%

SATISFIED
DISSATISFIED

4%j

NET SATISFIED

150
91%d

61
95%d

33
80%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

43
96%d

4
100%

100%z

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 2

Q.4. How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with your local area as a place to live?
Base : All Respondents

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

165

62*

50*

40*

74*

53*

66*

34*

17**

32*

87*

21**

32*

85*

23**

21**

Very satisfied

72

36

44%BD

58%zB

16
32%

19
48%

26
35%

22
42%

32
48%

13
38%

8
47%

13
41%

35
40%

14
67%

10
31%

38
45%

15
65%

8
38%

Fairly satisfied

84

24
39%

30

19
48%

43
58%

25
47%

32
48%

21
62%

8
47%

19
59%

45
52%

6
29%

20
63%

42
49%

7
30%

12
57%

Total

51%A

60%A

Neither satisfied nor


dissatisfied

3
2%

1
2%

1
2%

1
3%

1
1%

2
4%

1
2%

1
6%

2
2%

2
6%M

1
4%

Fairly dissatisfied

6
4%

1
2%

3
6%

1
3%

4
5%

4
8%

1
2%

5
6%

1
5%

5
6%

1
5%

Very dissatisfied

No opinion/ Don't know

60
97%

46
92%

38
95%

69
93%

47
89%

64
97%

100%E

16
94%

32
100%

80
92%

20
95%

30
94%

80
94%

22
96%

20
95%

1
2%

3
6%

1
3%

4
5%

4
8%

1
2%

5
6%

1
5%

5
6%

1
5%

59
95%

43
86%

37
93%

65
88%

43
81%

16
94%

32
100%J

75
86%

19
90%

30
94%

75
88%

22
96%

19
90%

SATISFIED

156
95%E

DISSATISFIED
NET SATISFIED

6
4%
150
91%EJ

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

63
95%E

34

34
100%E

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 3

Q.5. Thinking generally, which of the items on this list would you say are most important in making somewhere a good place to live?
Base : All Respondents

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

Off campus
(b)

Year of study
1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

6**

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

118

Support
(n)

18**

104

Oppose
(o)

100

65*

64*

41*

45*

15**

33*

32

25

19%b

25%zb

7
11%

16
25%

4
10%

6
13%

6
40%

7
21%

24
19%

1
25%

30
19%

1
17%

19
16%

7
39%

17
16%

9
43%

Amount and quality of


housing

51
31%

32
32%

19
29%

19
30%

15
37%

13
29%

4
27%

9
27%

42
33%

48
31%

2
33%

44
37%z

4
22%

37
36%

4
19%

Better town centres

50
30%

26
26%

24
37%

15
23%

15
37%

14
31%

6
40%

9
27%

40
31%

1
25%

47
30%

2
33%

33
28%

6
33%

34
33%

7
33%

Care for the elderly

9
5%

7
7%

2
3%

5
8%

3
7%

1
7%

3
9%

6
5%

8
5%

7
6%

1
6%

8
8%

1
5%

Education services and


opportunities to learn

62
38%

38
38%

24
37%

27
42%

17
41%

13
29%

5
33%

14
42%

47
37%

1
25%

57
37%

4
67%

45
38%

7
39%

38
37%

8
38%

Facilities for children


and young people

24
15%

14
14%

10
15%

8
13%

5
12%

7
16%

4
27%

5
15%

17
13%

2
50%

24
15%

19
16%

17
16%

2
10%

Health services

51
31%

32
32%

19
29%

21
33%

14
34%

11
24%

5
33%

10
30%

40
31%

1
25%

47
30%

2
33%

35
30%

7
39%

29
28%

8
38%

Job opportunities/high
levels of employment

59
36%

32
32%

27
42%

20
31%

13
32%

23
51%zc

3
20%

8
24%

49
38%

2
50%

56
36%

3
50%

44
37%

8
44%

38
37%

8
38%

Leisure facilities

46
28%

30
30%

16
25%

22
34%

9
22%

13
29%

2
13%

11
33%

35
27%

44
28%

1
17%

36
31%

3
17%

33
32%

6
29%

Play areas, parks and


open spaces

24
15%

15
15%

9
14%

9
14%

6
15%

7
16%

2
13%

5
15%

19
15%

24
15%

20
17%

16
15%

2
10%

Public safety/low crime


levels

99
60%

58
58%

41
63%

41
64%

24
59%

26
58%

8
53%

24
73%

73
57%

2
50%

93
60%

4
67%

71
60%

12
67%

65
63%

11
52%

Public transport and


roads

77
47%

47
47%

30
46%

24
38%

23
56%

25
56%

5
33%

12
36%

64
50%

1
25%

71
46%

4
67%

56
47%

8
44%

47
45%

8
38%

41

26
26%

15
23%

16
25%

11
27%

9
20%

5
33%

7
21%

32
25%

2
50%

40
26%

1
17%

24
20%

7
39%

25
24%

8
38%

25%l

156

Dissatisfied
(k)

165

The countryside and the


natural environment

4**

Satisfied
(j)

Arts and cultural


activities

Total

128

Other uni
(i)

21**

Other (specify)

Don't know

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 4

Q.5. Thinking generally, which of the items on this list would you say are most important in making somewhere a good place to live?
Base : All Respondents

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

62*

50*

40*

74*

53*

66*

34*

17**

32*

87*

21**

32*

85*

23**

21**

Arts and cultural


activities

32
19%

10
16%

12
24%

9
23%

14
19%

12
23%

11
17%

8
24%

6
35%

8
25%

15
17%

2
10%

11
34%zM

14
16%

4
17%

3
14%

Amount and quality of


housing

51
31%

21
34%

17
34%

14
35%

20
27%

17
32%

23
35%

7
21%

3
18%

10
31%

31
36%

5
24%

6
19%

26
31%

9
39%

10
48%

Better town centres

50
30%

22
35%

14
28%

12
30%

23
31%

16
30%

21
32%

11
32%

5
29%

8
25%

27
31%

7
33%

14
44%

24
28%

10
43%

2
10%

Care for the elderly

3
5%

3
6%

2
5%

6
8%

2
4%

2
3%

2
12%

15%zF

1
1%

3
14%

2
6%

2
2%

2
9%

3
14%

23
37%

13
26%

10
25%

29
39%

20
38%

22
33%

17
50%

7
41%

10
31%

34
39%

10
48%

12
38%

34
40%

9
39%

7
33%

5
8%

10
20%

2
5%

13
18%

11
21%

8
12%

4
12%

7
22%

14
16%

2
10%

5
16%

10
12%

3
13%

6
29%

Total

165

5%JM

9%J

Education services and


opportunities to learn

62

Facilities for children


and young people

24

Health services

51
31%

22
35%

11
22%

15
38%

20
27%

12
23%

20
30%

15
44%E

6
35%

10
31%

25
29%

8
38%

11
34%

25
29%

7
30%

6
29%

Job opportunities/high
levels of employment

59
36%

25
40%

20
40%

19
48%

25
34%

21
40%

24
36%

9
26%

4
24%

10
31%

32
37%

8
38%

8
25%

38
45%z

8
35%

2
10%

Leisure facilities

46
28%

22
35%

12
24%

16
40%

18
24%

17
32%

19
29%

7
21%

6
35%

7
22%

22
25%

11
52%

8
25%

26
31%

5
22%

6
29%

Play areas, parks and


open spaces

24
15%

8
13%

5
10%

5
13%

15
20%

8
15%

9
14%

4
12%

2
12%

8
25%

10
11%

4
19%

3
9%

10
12%

3
13%

8
38%

Public safety/low crime


levels

99
60%

38
61%

28
56%

24
60%

45
61%

30
57%

43
65%

19
56%

10
59%

20
63%

54
62%

10
48%

17
53%

52
61%

13
57%

14
67%

Public transport and


roads

77
47%

25
40%

28
56%

18
45%

32
43%

22
42%

32
48%

16
47%

6
35%

12
38%

47
54%z

6
29%

11
34%

40
47%

13
57%

10
48%

The countryside and the


natural environment

41

11
18%

18

6
15%

24

14
26%

17
26%

9
26%

7
41%

10
31%

16
18%

4
19%

16

18
21%

2
9%

3
14%

38%B
15%C

25%J

36%zA

32%C

50%zM

Other (specify)

Don't know

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 5

Q.6. Which of the items on this list would you most like to see improved, to make this area a better place to live?
Base : All Respondents

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Uni of
Canterbury
Christchurch
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

Oppose
(m)

41*

15**

33*

4
10%

4
9%

4
27%

4
12%

18
14%

1
25%

23
15%

14
12%

5
28%

12
12%

7
33%

Amount and quality of


housing

37

27
27%

10
15%

15
23%

10
24%

9
20%

3
20%

5
15%

32
25%

30
19%

4
67%

29
25%

6
33%

28
27%

7
33%

Better town centres

29

20
20%

9
14%

9
14%

10
24%

5
11%

5
33%

4
12%

24
19%

1
25%

24
15%

4
67%

19
16%

5
28%

19
18%

6
29%

2
2%

2
3%

1
2%

2
6%

2
2%

4
3%

1
1%

1
6%

1
1%

1
5%

9
9%

2
3%

1
2%

2
5%

13%c

2
13%

10
8%

1
25%

9
6%

2
33%

6
5%

4
22%

5
5%

4
19%

7%c

18**

104

Oppose
(o)

11
17%

2%l

118

Support
(n)

64*

6**

Support
(l)

8
12%

Care for the elderly

156

Dissatisfied
(k)

65*

18%j

4**

Satisfied
(j)

15
15%

22%j

128

Other uni
(i)

23
14%

165

45*

Other/ med
student/ postgrad
(f)

Arts and cultural


activities

Total

100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study

21**

Education services and


opportunities to learn

11

Facilities for children


and young people

19
12%

10
10%

9
14%

7
11%

3
7%

7
16%

2
13%

6
18%

12
9%

1
25%

18
12%

1
17%

12
10%

3
17%

9
9%

5
24%

Health services

18
11%

14
14%

4
6%

9
14%

3
7%

3
7%

3
20%

4
12%

14
11%

17
11%

1
17%

13
11%

3
17%

13
13%

3
14%

Job opportunities/high
levels of employment

44
27%

27
27%

17
26%

17
27%

11
27%

12
27%

4
27%

8
24%

35
27%

1
25%

41
26%

3
50%

32
27%

5
28%

27
26%

6
29%

Leisure facilities

35

25
25%

10
15%

17
27%d

4
10%

13

21%dg

1
7%

2
6%

26%zg

32
21%

2
33%

26
22%

2
11%

24
23%

3
14%

Play areas, parks and


open spaces

24
15%

17
17%

7
11%

8
13%

5
12%

9
20%

2
13%

6
18%

18
14%

23
15%

1
17%

17
14%

4
22%

17
16%

4
19%

Public safety/low crime


levels

18

4
6%

5
12%

5
11%

4
27%

2
6%

14
11%

2
50%

17
11%

1
17%

11
9%

4
22%

10
10%

4
19%

Public transport and


roads

40

17

13

41%zc

29%c

3
20%

7
21%

31
24%

2
50%

38
24%

1
17%

26
22%

8
44%

23
22%

5
24%

The countryside and the


natural environment

16

1
2%

16%d

1
7%

5
15%

10
8%

1
25%

14
9%

1
17%

8
7%

5
28%

6
6%

5
24%

7%cj

11%a
24%ac
10%ln

7
7%

11

18
18%

22

11
11%

17%a
34%za

7
11%

5
8%

7
11%

29%d

33

Other (specify)

Don't know

8
5%

5
5%

3
5%

5
8%

1
2%

1
2%

1
7%

2
6%

6
5%

8
5%

4
3%

3
3%

No answer

8
5%

7
7%

1
2%

5
8%

1
2%

1
2%

1
7%

2
6%

6
5%

8
5%

8
7%

4
4%

2
10%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 6

Q.6. Which of the items on this list would you most like to see improved, to make this area a better place to live?
Base : All Respondents

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

165

62*

50*

40*

74*

Arts and cultural


activities

23

9
15%

6
12%

4
10%

10
14%

3
6%

6
9%

Amount and quality of


housing

37
22%I

15
24%

13
26%

7
18%

16
22%

16
30%

12
18%

Better town centres

29
18%

10
16%

13
26%

5
13%

14
19%

12
23%

Care for the elderly

4
2%

3
6%

1
3%

2
3%

Total

14%EM

66*

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

87*

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

34*

17**

32*

12
35%zEF

6
35%

6
19%

8
9%

1
5%

8
24%

5
29%

3
9%

21
24%

6
29%

9
14%

5
15%

3
18%

4
13%

17
20%

2
4%

1
2%

1
3%

1
6%

11%C

6
11%

2
3%

2
6%

3
18%

21**

32*

Housing
(O)

23**

21**

7
8%

4
17%

2
10%

10
31%

16
19%

5
22%

5
24%

3
14%

8
25%

14
16%

5
22%

2
10%

2
2%

1
3%

2
2%

1
4%

2
6%

3
3%

2
10%

4
13%

6
7%

1
5%

12
14%

4
13%

10
12%

4
17%

1
5%

13%I

3
14%

4
13%

8
9%

3
13%

2
10%

10
31%zM

85*

Population
growth
(N)

Education services and


opportunities to learn

11
7%

4
6%

5
10%

Facilities for children


and young people

19
12%

4
6%

7
14%

6
15%

11
15%

6
11%

6
9%

6
18%

2
12%

4
13%

Health services

18
11%

5
8%

8
16%

9
23%zD

6
8%

8
15%

5
8%

4
12%

4
24%

13
21%

15
30%

8
20%

25
34%

15
28%

20
30%

6
18%

6
35%

8
25%

27
31%

3
14%

4
13%

31
36%zL

5
22%

4
19%

15
24%

9
18%

12
30%

14
19%

15
28%G

16
24%

3
9%

4
24%

5
16%

18
21%

8
38%

5
16%

18
21%

5
22%

7
33%

9
15%

5
10%

7
18%

7
9%

8
15%

9
14%

7
21%

4
24%

7
22%

8
9%

4
19%

3
9%

11
13%

4
17%

6
29%

4
8%

9
14%

3
9%

3
18%

3
9%

12
14%

5
16%

9
11%

2
9%

2
10%

13
25%

16
24%

9
26%

4
24%

6
19%

22
25%

5
24%

6
19%

22
26%

6
26%

5
24%

6
18%

2
12%

2
6%

9
10%

1
5%

6
19%

7
8%

1
4%

2
10%

2
10%

Job opportunities/high
levels of employment

44

Leisure facilities

35

27%L
21%G

53*

The same
(F)

Play areas, parks and


open spaces

24

Public safety/low crime


levels

18
11%

5
8%

7
14%

4
10%

10
14%

Public transport and


roads

40
24%

14
23%

14
28%

7
18%

24

The countryside and the


natural environment

16

8
13%

3
6%

2
5%

3
4%

4
8%

5
8%

15%J

10%D

32%z

Other (specify)

Don't know

8
5%

3
5%

2
4%

3
4%

1
2%

6
9%

3
9%

No answer

4
6%

1
2%

1
1%

2
3%

1
6%

2
6%

5%DJ

10%D

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

12%E

11

5
6%

3
9%

3
4%

1
1%

3
14%

2
6%

3
4%

2
9%

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 7

Q.7. On this card is a list of things that Canterbury City Council has identified as priorities.
Which two or three, if any, do you think it is most important for the Council to work towards?
Base : All Respondents

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

Oppose
(m)

41*

45*

15**

33*

10
16%

8
20%

7
16%

2
13%

4
12%

23
18%

25
16%

1
17%

18
15%

4
22%

15
14%

4
19%

Keeping the district a


safe place to live

82
50%

50
50%

32
49%

33
52%

23
56%

21
47%

5
33%

19
58%

61
48%

2
50%

78
50%

1
17%

61
52%

8
44%

55
53%

9
43%

Making the district


cleaner and greener

34
21%

21
21%

13
20%

19
30%ze

8
20%

5
11%

2
13%

9
27%

24
19%

1
25%

33
21%

24
20%

2
11%

21
20%

4
19%

Planning for the right


type and number of homes
in the right places

38

27
27%

11
17%

15
23%

10
24%

10
22%

3
20%

3
9%

35

35
22%

3
50%

31
26%

4
22%

31

23%g

30%z

2
10%

Supporting excellent and


diverse cultural
facilities and
activities for residents
and visitors

17
10%

10
10%

7
11%

5
8%

6
15%

3
7%

3
20%

3
9%

13
10%

1
25%

17
11%

9
8%

4
22%

9
9%

4
19%

Tackling disadvantage

31
19%

22
22%

9
14%

11
17%

8
20%

7
16%

5
33%

4
12%

26
20%

1
25%

29
19%

2
33%

18
15%

7
39%

17
16%

7
33%

Supporting a broad range


of sporting and fitness
facilities and
activities

23
14%

11
11%

12
18%

11
17%

4
10%

8
18%

6
18%

17
13%

22
14%

1
17%

18
15%

1
6%

14
13%

2
10%

Supporting facilities
and activities for
children and young
people

27
16%

14
14%

13
20%

8
13%

6
15%

11
24%

2
13%

7
21%

18
14%

2
50%

26
17%

1
17%

21
18%

2
11%

16
15%

4
19%

Supporting the growth of


the local economy and
the number of people in
work

73

49
49%

24
37%

32
50%

18
44%

16
36%

7
47%

9
27%

62

44%g

48%zg

2
50%

69
44%

2
33%

56
47%

5
28%

49
47%

7
33%

Tackling traffic
congestion and improving
the condition of roads
and pavements

55
33%

34
34%

21
32%

16
25%

11
27%

21

7
47%

9
27%

45
35%

1
25%

51
33%

2
33%

36
31%

9
50%

30
29%

10
48%

2
1%

1
1%

1
2%

2
3%

2
6%zh

2
1%

1
1%

1
1%

Don't know

No answer

*=Less than 0.5 %


Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

18**

104

Oppose
(o)

64*

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

118

Support
(n)

11
17%

Other (specify)

6**

Support
(l)

65*

47%zc

156

Dissatisfied
(k)

16
16%

27%zg

4**

Satisfied
(j)

27
16%

165

128

Other uni
(i)

Encouraging greater
involvement for local
people

Total

100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study

21**

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 8

Q.7. On this card is a list of things that Canterbury City Council has identified as priorities.
Which two or three, if any, do you think it is most important for the Council to work towards?
Base : All Respondents

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

62*

50*

40*

74*

53*

66*

34*

17**

32*

87*

21**

32*

85*

23**

21**

Encouraging greater
involvement for local
people

27
16%

8
13%

10
20%

8
20%

11
15%

12
23%

9
14%

5
15%

5
29%

5
16%

13
15%

3
14%

6
19%

18
21%

3
14%

Keeping the district a


safe place to live

82
50%

32
52%

24
48%

23
58%

37
50%

22
42%

35
53%

19
56%

8
47%

13
41%

45
52%

10
48%

14
44%

43
51%

10
43%

11
52%

Making the district


cleaner and greener

34
21%

12
19%

11
22%

7
18%

15
20%

14
26%

12
18%

6
18%

5
29%

6
19%

20
23%

2
10%

8
25%

14
16%

9
39%

3
14%

Planning for the right


type and number of homes
in the right places

38
23%

19
31%

16
32%

9
23%

19
26%

16
30%

13
20%

6
18%

3
18%

5
16%

20
23%

7
33%

6
19%

19
22%

4
17%

7
33%

Supporting excellent and


diverse cultural
facilities and
activities for residents
and visitors

17

4
6%

8
16%

1
3%

10
14%

7
13%

5
8%

5
15%

2
12%

4
13%

9
10%

2
10%

7
22%z

8
9%

2
9%

Tackling disadvantage

31

6
10%

9
18%

7
18%

13
18%

12
23%

11
17%

7
21%

3
18%

9
28%

14
16%

2
10%

9
28%

14
16%

4
17%

4
19%

5
7%

9
17%

10
15%

2
6%

3
18%

5
16%

10
11%

5
24%

2
6%

10
12%

5
22%

5
24%

Total

165

10%C

19%A

Supporting a broad range


of sporting and fitness
facilities and
activities

23

13
21%

7
14%

12

14%D

Supporting facilities
and activities for
children and young
people

27
16%

10
16%

11
22%

4
10%

14
19%

11
21%

8
12%

6
18%

5
29%

6
19%

10
11%

4
19%

8
25%

11
13%

3
13%

4
19%

Supporting the growth of


the local economy and
the number of people in
work

73

25
40%

18
36%

16
40%

37
50%

15
28%

37

17

44%E

56%zE

50%E

8
47%

16
50%

39
45%

6
29%

14
44%

39
46%

11
48%

7
33%

Tackling traffic
congestion and improving
the condition of roads
and pavements

55
33%

22
35%

14
28%

10
25%

26
35%

14
26%

22
33%

14
41%

2
12%

12
38%

36
41%z

4
19%

10
31%

27
32%

11
48%

7
33%

Other (specify)

2
1%

1
2%

1
3%

1
1%

1
2%

1
2%

1
6%

1
1%

1
1%

Don't know

No answer

30%zD

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 9

Q.8a. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in your local area?
Base : All Respondents

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

Oppose
(o)

64*

41*

45*

15**

33*

6**

118

18**

104

21**

14
22%

21

7
16%

2
13%

7
21%

30
23%

1
25%

35
22%

2
33%

38

36

33%ze

8
20%

80
48%

47
47%

33
51%

26
41%

22
54%

24
53%

8
53%

15
45%

63
49%

2
50%

75
48%

4
67%

80

63

Neither support nor


oppose

29

15
15%

14
22%

12
19%

4
10%

9
20%

4
27%

10
30%zh

18
14%

1
25%

28
18%

Tend to oppose

15

11
11%

4
6%

4
6%

6
15%

4
9%

1
7%

1
3%

14
11%

15
10%

Tend to support

18%hln
9%ln

156

Dissatisfied
(k)

65*

165

4**

Satisfied
(j)

24
24%

Strongly support

128

Other uni
(i)

38
23%

Total

100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study

32%z
68%z

35%z
61%z

4
19%

4
4%

2
10%

15
83%

13
62%

1
1%

2
10%

Strongly oppose

3
2%

3
3%

1
2%

1
2%

1
2%

3
2%

3
2%

3
17%

Don't know

SUPPORT

118
72%

71
71%

47
72%

47
73%

30
73%

31
69%

10
67%

22
67%

93
73%

3
75%

110
71%

6
100%

118

99

100%z

18

14
14%

4
6%

5
8%

7
17%

5
11%

1
7%

1
3%

17
13%

18
12%

18
100%

57
57%

43
66%

42
66%

23
56%

26
58%

9
60%

21
64%

76
59%

3
75%

92
59%

6
100%

118

-18
-100%

OPPOSE

11%ln

NET SUPPORT

100
61%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

100%z

95%z

4
19%

1
1%

15
71%

98
94%z

-11
-52%

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 10

Q.8a. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in your local area?
Base : All Respondents

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

165

62*

50*

40*

74*

53*

66*

34*

17**

Strongly support

38

17
27%

13
26%

10
25%

14
19%

22

8
12%

5
15%

4
24%

2
6%

Tend to support

80

23
46%

17
43%

41
55%

18
34%

41

48%E

28
45%

62%zE

15
44%

4
24%

19
59%

Neither support nor


oppose

29
18%

8
13%

10
20%

7
18%

13
18%

9
17%

13
20%

5
15%

3
18%

Tend to oppose

15

8
13%

2
4%

4
10%

6
8%

3
6%

2
3%

3
2%

1
2%

2
4%

2
5%

1
2%

2
3%

Don't know

SUPPORT

118

45
73%

36
72%

27
68%

55
74%

9
15%

4
8%

6
15%

6
8%

36
58%

32
64%

21
53%

49
66%

Total

23%FIL

9%FJ

Strongly oppose

72%L

OPPOSE

18
11%J

NET SUPPORT

100
61%GL

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

87*

21**

22
25%I

10
48%

3
9%

44
51%

9
43%

13
41%

7
22%

16
18%

2
10%

4
24%

4
13%

4
5%

2
12%

40
75%

49
74%

20
59%

4
8%

4
6%

42%zFG

36

45

68%G

68%G

Housing
(O)

85*

23**

21**

28%L

5
22%

6
29%

40
47%

14
61%

11
52%

7
22%

14
16%

3
13%

4
19%

6
19%

7
8%

1
4%

1
1%

3
9%zM

8
47%

21
66%

66
76%

19
90%

16
50%

19
83%

17
81%

26%zEF

6
35%

4
13%

5
6%

1
4%

11
32%

2
12%

17
53%

18
78%

17
81%

61
70%z

19
90%

32*

Population
growth
(N)

24

26%zEF

32*

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

9
28%zM

7
22%

64
75%L

7
8%
57
67%L

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 11

Q.8b. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury, by that I mean Canterbury as well as Herne Bay, Whitstable and
the surrounding area as shown on this map?
Base : All Respondents

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

Oppose
(o)

64*

41*

45*

15**

33*

6**

118

18**

104

21**

12
18%

18
28%

7
17%

6
13%

4
27%

7
21%

27
21%

1
25%

31
20%

3
50%

35

35

69
42%

41
41%

28
43%

24
38%

19
46%

20
44%

6
40%

14
42%

53
41%

2
50%

66
42%

2
33%

64

1
6%

69

Neither support nor


oppose

37

15
15%

22

22%aln

14
22%

9
22%

11
24%

3
20%

11
33%

25
20%

1
25%

35
22%

1
17%

12
10%

2
11%

Tend to oppose

17

15

10%bln

15%zb

2
3%

5
8%

4
10%

6
13%

2
13%

1
3%

16
13%

17
11%

3
3%

12
67%

17
81%

34%za

156

Dissatisfied
(k)

65*

Tend to support

4**

Satisfied
(j)

23
23%

165

128

Other uni
(i)

35
21%

Total
Strongly support

100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study

30%z
54%z

34%z
66%z

2%l

4
4%

2
3%

1
2%

1
2%

4
3%

4
3%

1
1%

3
17%

4
19%

Don't know

3
2%

2
2%

1
2%

1
2%

1
2%

1
2%

3
2%

3
2%

3
3%

SUPPORT

104
63%

64
64%

40
62%

42
66%

26
63%

26
58%

10
67%

21
64%

80
63%

3
75%

97
62%

5
83%

1
6%

104
100%z

2
3%

7
11%

5
12%

7
16%

2
13%

1
3%

16%z

21
13%

15
83%

21
100%

38
58%

35
55%

21
51%

19
42%

8
53%

20
61%

60
47%

3
75%

76
49%

5
83%

-14
-78%

104

-21
-100%

Strongly oppose

OPPOSE
NET SUPPORT

21

19

13%bgln

19%zb

83
50%

45
45%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

20

99
84%z

4
3%
95
81%z

100%z

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 12

Q.8b. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury, by that I mean Canterbury as well as Herne Bay, Whitstable and
the surrounding area as shown on this map?
Base : All Respondents

Enough homes
Total
(z)
Total
Strongly support
Tend to support
Neither support nor
oppose
Tend to oppose

Don't know
SUPPORT

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

62*

50*

40*

74*

53*

66*

34*

17**

14
28%

9
23%

11
15%

17

21%I

14
23%

10
15%

4
12%

4
24%

1
3%

69
42%

24
39%

22
44%

18
45%

36
49%

21
40%

35

11
32%

4
24%

37
22%

12
19%

10
20%

7
18%

17
23%

12
23%

16
24%

6
18%

17

9
15%

2
4%

3
8%

9
12%

2
4%

2
3%

12

4
2%

2
3%

1
2%

3
8%zD

1
2%

3
5%

3
2%

1
2%

1
2%

1
1%

38
61%

36
72%

27
68%

47
64%

38

45

72%G

68%G

11
18%

3
6%

6
15%

9
12%

3
6%

5
8%

21
53%

38
51%

104
21
13%EJ

NET SUPPORT

Agree
(C)

35

63%GL

OPPOSE

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

165

10%EFJ

Strongly oppose

Agree
(A)

83
50%GIL

27
44%

33
66%zA

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

32%zFG

53%z

35

40

66%zG

61%zG

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Housing
(O)

21**

85*

23**

21**

22
25%I

8
38%

3
9%

22
26%

5
22%

5
24%

15
47%

36
41%

11
52%

12
38%

34
40%

10
43%

11
52%

2
12%

9
28%

23
26%

1
5%

6
19%

20
24%

4
17%

5
24%

4
24%

1
5%

16%J

4
5%

7
8%

1
4%

3
18%

1
3%

2
6%

1
1%

1
4%

1
3%

1
3%

2
2%

1
1%

2
9%

15
44%

8
47%

16
50%

58
67%

19
90%

15
47%

56
66%

15
65%

16
76%

12

7
41%

6
19%J

4
5%

1
5%

8
9%

2
9%

13
57%

16
76%

35%zEF

3
9%

1
6%

10
31%

54
62%zI

18
86%

32*

Population
growth
(N)

87*

35%zEF

32*

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

28%zM

11
34%zM

4
13%

48
56%L

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 13

Q.9.1. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?
It meant that enough affordable homes were provided for local residents
Base : All

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
local area

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
student/ postgrad
(f)

Uni of
Canterbury
Christchurch
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

Oppose
(o)

64*

41*

45*

15**

33*

6**

118

18**

104

21**

13
29%

5
33%

11
33%

28
22%

2
50%

38
24%

2
33%

33%z

34

34%za

10
24%

39

25%a

13
20%

33%z

Tend to support

98
59%

63
63%

35
54%

38
59%

27
66%

24
53%

9
60%

18
55%

79
62%

1
25%

92
59%

4
67%

72
61%

6
33%

64
62%

9
43%

Neither support nor


oppose

19

13
13%

6
9%

7
11%

4
10%

7
16%

1
7%

3
9%

16
13%

19
12%

5
4%

8
44%

4
4%

8
38%

5
3%

3
3%

2
3%

5
8%z

1
3%

3
2%

1
25%

5
3%

2
2%

2
11%

2
2%

2
10%

Strongly oppose

2
1%

2
2%

1
2%

1
2%

2
2%

2
1%

2
11%

2
10%

Don't know

SUPPORT

139
84%

82
82%

57
88%

51
80%

37
90%

37
82%

14
93%

29
88%

107
84%

3
75%

130
83%

6
100%

5
5%

2
3%

1
2%

1
3%

5
4%

1
25%

7
4%

77
77%

55
85%

45
70%

37

36
80%

14
93%

28
85%

102
80%

2
50%

123
79%

Tend to oppose

OPPOSE

41

12%ln

4%ln

NET SUPPORT

132
80%c

9%zd

90%c

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

156

Dissatisfied
(k)

22

165

4**

Satisfied
(j)

Support for building in


district

65*

Strongly support

128

Other uni
(i)

Support for building in area

19
19%

Total

100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study

6
100%

111
94%z

6
33%

2
2%

4
22%

109
92%z

2
11%

98
94%z

9
43%

2
2%

4
19%

96
92%z

5
24%

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 14

Q.9.1. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?
It meant that enough affordable homes were provided for local residents
Base : All

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

165

62*

50*

40*

74*

53*

66*

41

14
28%

9
23%

19
26%

19

18

25%GL

16
26%

36%zG

27%G

Tend to support

98
59%

36
58%

28
56%

22
55%

48
65%

29
55%

42
64%

Neither support nor


oppose

19

6
8%

2
4%
2
4%

Total
Strongly support

Option selection

Less homes
(G)
34*

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

17**

32*

87*

21**

2
6%

3
18%

5
16%

23
26%

8
38%

32*
2
6%

21
62%

6
35%

22
69%

54
62%

13
62%

4
6%

10

5
29%

5
16%

7
8%

2
3%

2
12%

3
3%

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

85*

23**

21**

24
28%L

5
22%

9
43%

22
69%

49
58%

14
61%

11
52%

6
19%

9
11%

3
13%

1
5%

2
6%

1
1%

1
4%

6
10%

7
14%

5
13%

5
3%

3
5%

1
2%

3
8%D

Strongly oppose

2
1%

1
2%

1
3%

1
1%

1
2%

1
3%

1
6%

2
2%

Don't know

SUPPORT

139

52
84%

42
84%

31
78%

67

48

60

91%z

91%G

91%zG

23
68%

9
53%

27
84%

77
89%

21
100%

24
75%

73
86%

19
83%

20
95%

4
6%

1
2%

1
1%

3
6%

1
3%

3
18%

3
3%

2
6%

3
4%

1
4%

48
77%

41
82%

22
65%

6
35%

27
84%

74
85%

21
100%

22
69%

70
82%

18
78%

20
95%

Tend to oppose

12%E

84%G

OPPOSE
NET SUPPORT

7
4%
132
80%CG

4
10%D

27
68%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

2
3%

66

45

58

89%zC

85%G

88%zG

29%zEF

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 15

Q.9.2. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?
It increases the demands on public services
Base : All

Student residence
Total
(z)
Total

165

On campus
(a)
100

Off campus
(b)
65*

Year of study
1st year
(c)
64*

2nd year
(d)

3rd/ final year


(e)

41*

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

45*

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)
15**

33*

Uni of Kent
(h)
128

Other uni
(i)
4**

Satisfied
(j)
156

Dissatisfied
(k)
6**

9
9%

1
2%

6
9%

1
2%

1
2%

2
13%

1
3%

9
7%

10
6%

86
52%

49
49%

37
57%

28
44%

25
61%

24
53%

9
60%

18
55%

66
52%

2
50%

79
51%

6
100%

Neither support nor


oppose

39

23
23%

16
25%

17
27%

12
29%

9
20%

1
7%

9
27%

29
23%

1
25%

37
24%

Tend to oppose

24

15
15%

9
14%

11

4%l

4
4%

Don't know

SUPPORT

Strongly support

10
6%b

Tend to support

24%n

OPPOSE

118
10
8%
72

Support
(n)

18**
-

104
9
9%

Oppose
(o)
21**
-

3
17%

69

61%z

66%z

3
14%

25
21%

2
11%

19
18%

4
19%

1
2%

20%d

3
20%

5
15%

18
14%

1
25%

24
15%

9
8%

10
56%

7
7%

10
48%

2
3%

2
3%

2
5%

2
4%

6
5%

6
4%

2
2%

3
17%

4
19%

96
58%

58
58%

38
58%

34
53%

26
63%

25
56%

11
73%

19
58%

75
59%

2
50%

89
57%

6
100%

30

19
19%

11
17%

13
20%

3
7%

11
24%d

3
20%

5
15%

24
19%

1
25%

30
19%

39
39%

27
42%

21
33%

14
31%

8
53%

14
42%

51
40%

1
25%

59
38%

6
100%

18%dln

NET SUPPORT

Oppose
(m)

17%d

15%dln

Strongly oppose

Support
(l)

66
40%j

23
56%zce

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

82
69%z

3
17%

11
9%

13
72%

71
60%z

-10
-56%

78
75%z

3
14%

7
7%

14
67%

71
68%z

-11
-52%

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 16

Q.9.2. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?
It increases the demands on public services
Base : All

Enough homes
Total
(z)
Total
Strongly support

Agree
(A)

165

62*

10

6%D

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

11%z

Agree
(C)

50*
2
4%

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

66*

Option selection

Less homes
(G)
34*

A
(H)

B
(I)

17**

C
(J)

40*

74*

5
9%

3
5%

2
6%

1
3%

10%D

53*

The same
(F)

32*

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

87*

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)
21**

32*

6
7%

3
14%

85*

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

23**

21**

7
8%

1
4%

2
10%

26
42%

31
62%A

21
53%

45

52%A

61%z

31
58%

36
55%

14
41%

5
29%

19
59%

46
53%

12
57%

14
44%

46
54%

10
43%

13
62%

Neither support nor


oppose

39
24%

16
26%

12
24%

5
13%

17
23%

12
23%

14
21%

7
21%

4
24%

7
22%

22
25%

5
24%

8
25%

19
22%

6
26%

6
29%

Tend to oppose

24

10
16%

4
8%

8
20%

8
11%

3
6%

1
5%

9
11%

5
22%

Tend to support

86

15%E

12
18%E

26%zE

6
35%

4
13%

11
13%

2
12%

1
3%

2
2%

1
3%

4
5%

1
4%

28%zM

Strongly oppose

6
4%

3
5%

1
2%

2
5%

4
5%

2
4%

1
2%

2
6%

Don't know

SUPPORT

96
58%

33
53%

33
66%

25
63%

45
61%

36
68%

39
59%

16
47%

5
29%

20
63%

52
60%

15
71%

14
44%

53
62%

11
48%

15
71%

OPPOSE

30

13
21%

5
10%

10
25%

12
16%

5
9%

13
20%

11

8
47%

5
16%

13
15%

1
5%

10

13
15%

6
26%

20
32%

28

15
38%

33
45%

31

26
39%G

5
15%

-3
-18%

15
47%

39
45%

14
67%

40

58%zFG

5
22%

15
71%

18%E

NET SUPPORT

66
40%GL

56%zA

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

32%zE

31%z

4
13%

47%L

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 17

Q.9.3. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?
It meant that young people and families could stay in the district
Base : All

Student residence
Total
(z)
Total
Strongly support
Tend to support
Neither support nor
oppose

On campus
(a)

1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
student/ postgrad
(f)

Uni of
Canterbury
Christchurch
(g)

65*

64*

41*

45*

15**

33*

19
30%

10
24%

8
18%

6
40%

16

26%h

22
34%

99
60%

63
63%

36
55%

37
58%

27
66%

27
60%

8
53%

16
48%

19

13
13%

6
9%

7
11%

3
7%

8
18%

1
7%

1
3%

43

12%ln

Satisfaction with
local area

University affiliation

21
21%

165

100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study

48%zh

Uni of Kent
(h)
128

Other uni
(i)
4**

Satisfied
(j)
156

Dissatisfied
(k)

Support for building in area


Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

Support for building in


district
Support
(n)

Oppose
(o)

6**

118

18**

104

21**

25
20%

2
50%

39
25%

3
50%

39

1
6%

34

82

1
25%

94
60%

3
50%

74
63%

6
33%

69

64%z

17
13%

1
25%

19
12%

4
3%

8
44%
1
6%

1
5%

33%z

33%z
66%z

7
33%

1
1%

11
52%

Tend to oppose

2
1%

1
1%

1
2%

1
2%

1
2%

2
2%

2
1%

1
1%

Strongly oppose

2
1%

2
2%

1
2%

1
2%

2
2%

2
1%

2
11%

2
10%

Don't know

SUPPORT

142
86%

84
84%

58
89%

56
88%

37
90%

35
78%

14
93%

107
84%

3
75%

133
85%

6
100%

3
3%

1
2%

1
2%

1
2%

2
4%

81
81%

57
88%

55
86%

36
88%

33
73%

14
93%

OPPOSE

2%l

NET SUPPORT

138
84%eh

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

32
97%zh

4
3%

32

103
80%

97%zh

3
75%

4
3%
129
83%

6
100%

113

7
39%

103

96%z

1
1%

3
17%

3
14%

4
22%

103

4
19%

112
95%z

99%z

99%z

7
33%

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 18

Q.9.3. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?
It meant that young people and families could stay in the district
Base : All

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

165

62*

50*

40*

74*

53*

66*

34*

32*

87*

21**

43

13
26%

10
25%

16
22%

17

20

26%GL

17
27%

32%G

30%G

4
12%

1
6%

5
16%

26
30%

10
48%

1
3%

Tend to support

99
60%

34
55%

32
64%

25
63%

50
68%

34
64%

40
61%

18
53%

8
47%

22
69%

55
63%

10
48%

22
69%

Neither support nor


oppose

19

10

Total
Strongly support

17**

C
(J)

32*

Housing
(O)

85*

23**

21**

26
31%L

5
22%

10
48%

49
58%

15
65%

10
48%
1
5%

8
13%

5
10%

4
10%

6
8%

1
2%

6
9%

7
41%

5
16%

5
6%

1
5%

7
8%

3
13%

Tend to oppose

2
1%

2
3%

1
1%

1
3%

1
1%

1
3%

1
1%

Strongly oppose

2
1%

1
2%

1
3%

1
1%

1
2%

1
3%

1
6%

2
2%

Don't know

SUPPORT

142

51
82%

45
90%

35
88%

66
89%

51

60

96%zG

91%G

22
65%

9
53%

27
84%

93%z

20
95%

23
72%

88%L

20
87%

20
95%

3
5%

1
3%

2
3%

2
6%

1
6%

1
1%

1
3%

3
4%

48
77%

45
90%

34
85%

64
86%

50

60

94%zG

91%zG

20
59%

8
47%

27
84%

20
95%

22
69%

72
85%

20
87%

20
95%

12%EJ

86%GL

OPPOSE
NET SUPPORT

4
2%
138
84%GL

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

1
2%

29%zEF

81

80
92%z

Population
growth
(N)

25%zM

75

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 19

Q.9.4. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?
It meant building on greenfield i.e. land that is undeveloped
Base : All

Student residence
Total
(z)
Total

165

On campus
(a)
100

Off campus
(b)
65*

Year of study
1st year
(c)
64*

2nd year
(d)

3rd/ final year


(e)

41*

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

45*

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)
15**

33*

Uni of Kent
(h)
128

Other uni
(i)
4**

Satisfied
(j)
156

Dissatisfied
(k)
6**

Support
(l)
118

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

18**

4
2%

3
3%

1
2%

3
5%

1
2%

1
3%

3
2%

3
2%

1
17%

4
3%

Tend to support

33
20%

20
20%

13
20%

12
19%

9
22%

9
20%

3
20%

8
24%

24
19%

1
25%

33
21%

28
24%

1
6%

27

Neither support nor


oppose

33
20%

23
23%

10
15%

13
20%

8
20%

7
16%

5
33%

7
21%

25
20%

1
25%

29
19%

3
50%

27
23%

26

Tend to oppose

63

29
29%

34

38%a

52%za

23
36%

19
46%

17
38%

4
27%

12
36%

49
38%

2
50%

60
38%

2
33%

45
38%

31

25

19%bln

25%zb

6
9%

12
19%

5
12%

11
24%

3
20%

5
15%

26
20%

30
19%

Strongly oppose

104

Strongly support

2
2%
26%z

Oppose
(o)
21**
1
5%

25%z

6
33%

37
36%

6
29%

13
11%

11
61%

11
11%

14
67%

1
1%

1
1%

Don't know

1
1%

1
2%

1
2%

1
1%

1
1%

SUPPORT

37
22%

23
23%

14
22%

15
23%

9
22%

10
22%

3
20%

9
27%

27
21%

1
25%

36
23%

1
17%

32

94

54
54%

40
62%

35
55%

24
59%

28
62%

7
47%

17
52%

75
59%

2
50%

90
58%

2
33%

58
49%

17
94%

48
46%

20
95%

-31
-31%

-26
-40%

-20
-31%

-15
-37%

-18
-40%

-4
-27%

-8
-24%

-48
-38%

-1
-25%

-54
-35%

-1
-17%

-26
-22%

-16
-89%

-19
-18%

-19
-90%

OPPOSE

57%ln

NET SUPPORT

-57
-35%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

27%z

1
6%

29
28%z

1
5%

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 20

Q.9.4. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?
It meant building on greenfield i.e. land that is undeveloped
Base : All

Enough homes
Total
(z)
Total
Strongly support
Tend to support

165
4
2%
33
20%L

Agree
(A)
62*

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

50*

Disagree
(D)
40*

Future development
More homes
(E)

74*

53*

The same
(F)
66*

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

34*

17**

1
2%

1
2%

2
5%

1
1%

3
6%

1
2%

13
21%

13
26%

7
18%

16
22%

13
25%

12
18%

7
21%

1
6%

C
(J)
32*

5
16%

18
21%

9
43%

18

23

22

20%AL

7
11%

10
20%

8
20%

10
14%

12
23%

14
21%

3
9%

2
12%

25
40%

18
36%

16
40%

30
41%

16
30%

30
45%

11
32%

6
35%

18

31

15
24%

8
16%

6
15%

17
23%

9
17%

9
14%

13

1
2%

1
3%

14
23%

14
28%

9
23%

17
23%

16
30%

13
20%

7
21%

40
65%

26
52%

22
55%

47
64%

25
47%

39
59%

24

-26
-42%

-12
-24%

-13
-33%

-30
-41%

-9
-17%

-26
-39%

-17
-50%

SUPPORT

1
1%
37
22%L

OPPOSE

94
57%M

NET SUPPORT

-57
-35%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

71%E

85*

63
38%

Don't know

32*

1
5%

33

38%zEF

21**

2
2%

Tend to oppose

19%JM

87*

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

1
3%

Neither support nor


oppose

Strongly oppose

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

21%L

23**

Housing
(O)
21**

1
5%

6
26%

8
38%

26%zI

5
24%

1
3%

26%L

5
22%

5
24%

56%z

35
40%

2
10%

16
50%

33
39%

7
30%

6
29%

8
47%

5
16%

9
10%

4
19%

15

9
11%

5
22%

1
5%

6
19%

20
23%

10
48%

21
25%L

6
26%

9
43%

14
82%

23

44
51%

6
29%

31

42
49%

12
52%

7
33%

-13
-76%

-17
-53%

-24
-28%

4
19%

-31
-97%

-21
-25%

-6
-26%

2
10%

1
6%

3
9%

3
4%

Population
growth
(N)

72%J

47%zM

97%zM

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 21

Q.9.5. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?
It helped to create jobs by attracting people and businesses to the area
Base : All

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
student/ postgrad
(f)

Uni of
Canterbury
Christchurch
(g)

65*

64*

41*

45*

15**

33*

26
26%

20
31%

23

8
18%

4
27%

14

36%e

11
27%

92

58
58%

34
52%

29
45%

25
61%

30

56%c

67%c

19
12%

11
11%

8
12%

8
13%

3
7%

7
4%ln

4
4%

3
5%

3
5%

Strongly oppose

1
1%

1
1%

Don't know

SUPPORT

138
84%
8

Strongly support
Tend to support
Neither support nor
oppose
Tend to oppose

OPPOSE

165

5%ln

NET SUPPORT

130
79%

Satisfaction with
local area

University affiliation

46
28%

Total

100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study

Uni of Kent
(h)

156

Dissatisfied
(k)

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

Oppose
(o)

6**

118

18**

104

21**

42
27%

3
50%

42

1
6%

37

42%z

36%z

8
53%

15
45%

74
58%

3
75%

88
56%

2
33%

63
53%

10
56%

56
54%

13
62%

5
11%

3
20%

4
12%

14
11%

1
25%

18
12%

1
17%

11
9%

3
17%

9
9%

4
19%

2
5%

2
4%

7
5%

7
4%

2
2%

3
17%

2
2%

3
14%

1
2%

1
1%

1
1%

1
6%

1
5%

84
84%

54
83%

52
81%

36
88%

38
84%

12
80%

29
88%

106
83%

3
75%

130
83%

5
83%

5
5%

3
5%

4
6%

2
5%

2
4%

8
6%

79
79%

51
78%

48
75%

34
83%

36
80%

12
80%

29
88%

98
77%

3
75%

*=Less than 0.5 %


Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

4**

Satisfied
(j)

Support for building in


district

32
25%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

128

Other uni
(i)

Support for building in area

8
5%
122
78%

5
83%

36%z

105
89%z

11
61%

2
2%

4
22%

103
87%z

7
39%

93
89%z

13
62%

2
2%

4
19%

91
88%z

9
43%

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 22

Q.9.5. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?
It helped to create jobs by attracting people and businesses to the area
Base : All

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

165

62*

50*

40*

74*

53*

66*

34*

17**

32*

87*

21**

46

14
28%

13
33%

22
30%

20

21

28%GL

17
27%

38%G

32%G

4
12%

4
24%

7
22%

25
29%

10
48%

1
3%

Tend to support

92
56%

34
55%

28
56%

22
55%

43
58%

30
57%

36
55%

22
65%

6
35%

17
53%

52
60%

9
43%

22
69%

Neither support nor


oppose

19

Total
Strongly support

32*

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

85*

23**

21**

28
33%L

6
26%

9
43%

46
54%

11
48%

11
52%
1
5%

8
13%

6
12%

3
8%

6
8%

2
4%

6
9%

18%E

3
18%

22%J

7
8%

2
10%

6
19%

7
8%

5
22%

Tend to oppose

7
4%

3
5%

2
4%

1
3%

3
4%

3
5%

2
6%

3
18%

1
3%

3
3%

3
9%

3
4%

1
4%

Strongly oppose

1
1%

1
3%

1
2%

1
6%

1
1%

Don't know

SUPPORT

138
84%

51
82%

42
84%

35
88%

65
88%

57
86%

26
76%

10
59%

24
75%

77
89%

19
90%

23
72%

74
87%

17
74%

20
95%

8
5%

3
5%

2
4%

2
5%

3
4%

3
5%

2
6%

4
24%

1
3%

3
3%

3
9%

4
5%

1
4%

48
77%

40
80%

33
83%

62
84%

54
82%

24
71%

6
35%

23
72%

19
90%

20
63%

16
70%

20
95%

OPPOSE
NET SUPPORT

12%E

130
79%L

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

50
94%zG

1
2%
49
92%zG

74
85%z

70
82%L

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 23

Q.9.6. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?
It meant an increase in traffic and congestion
Base : All

Student residence
Total
(z)
Total

165

On campus
(a)
100

Off campus
(b)
65*

Year of study
1st year
(c)
64*

2nd year
(d)

3rd/ final year


(e)

41*

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

45*

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)
15**

33*

Uni of Kent
(h)
128

Other uni
(i)
4**

Satisfied
(j)
156

Dissatisfied
(k)
6**

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

118

18**

104

3
5%

1
2%

1
7%

1
3%

4
3%

5
3%

16
16%

19

8
20%

8
18%

6
40%

8
24%

26
20%

1
25%

33
21%

2
33%

28%z

1
6%

32

29%a

13
20%

33

21%a

31%z

Neither support nor


oppose

30
18%

15
15%

15
23%

13
20%

8
20%

8
18%

1
7%

9
27%

21
16%

29
19%

1
17%

22
19%

1
6%

21
20%

1
5%

Tend to oppose

67
41%

44
44%

23
35%

25
39%

19
46%

19
42%

4
27%

10
30%

55
43%

2
50%

62
40%

3
50%

46
39%

8
44%

39
38%

8
38%

Strongly oppose

28

20
20%

8
12%

10
16%

6
15%

9
20%

3
20%

5
15%

22
17%

1
25%

27
17%

12
10%

8
44%

8
8%

12
57%

Tend to support

35

17%ln

Don't know

SUPPORT

40
24%

21
21%

19
29%

16
25%

8
20%

9
20%

7
47%

9
27%

30
23%

1
25%

38
24%

2
33%

38

95

64

58%bln

64%zb

31
48%

35
55%

25
61%

28
62%

7
47%

15
45%

77
60%

3
75%

89
57%

3
50%

58
49%

-12
-18%

-19
-30%

-17
-41%

-19
-42%

0
0%

-6
-18%

-47
-37%

-2
-50%

-51
-33%

-1
-17%

-20
-17%

OPPOSE
NET SUPPORT

-55
-33%

-43
-43%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

32%z

4
4%

21**

5
3%

Oppose
(o)

5
5%

Strongly support

5
4%

Support
(n)

36
35%z

16
89%

47
45%

20
95%

-15
-83%

-11
-11%

-20
-95%

1
6%

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 24

Q.9.6. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?
It meant an increase in traffic and congestion
Base : All

Enough homes
Total
(z)
Total
Strongly support
Tend to support

165
5
3%
35
21%G

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

62*
3
5%

Agree
(C)

50*
2
4%

Disagree
(D)
40*

Future development
More homes
(E)

74*

2
5%

1
1%

11
18%

18
36%zA

7
18%

16
22%

53*
2
4%
19
36%zFG

The same
(F)
66*

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

B
(I)
17**

C
(J)
32*

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

87*

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)
21**

32*

85*

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

23**

21**

2
3%

1
3%

1
3%

3
3%

1
5%

3
4%

2
10%

11
17%

2
6%

2
12%

6
19%

19
22%

6
29%

4
13%

19
22%

4
17%

5
24%

Neither support nor


oppose

30

9
15%

6
12%

8
20%

10
14%

5
9%

29%zE

4
12%

1
6%

6
19%

21

18%E

24%z

2
10%

3
9%

18
21%

5
22%

3
14%

Tend to oppose

67
41%

27
44%

18
36%

14
35%

34
46%

20
38%

26
39%

16
47%

6
35%

14
44%

37
43%

8
38%

17
53%

33
39%

9
39%

8
38%

Strongly oppose

28

12
19%

6
12%

9
23%

13
18%

7
13%

8
12%

11

8
47%

5
16%

7
8%

4
19%

8
25%

12
14%

5
22%

3
14%

2
12%

7
22%

22
25%

7
33%

4
13%

22
26%

4
17%

7
33%

14
82%

19
59%

44
51%

12
57%

25

45
53%

14
61%

11
52%

-12
-71%

-12
-38%

-22
-25%

-5
-24%

-21
-66%

-23
-27%

-10
-43%

-4
-19%

17%J

Don't know

SUPPORT

40

OPPOSE
NET SUPPORT

19

34*

A
(H)

32%zEF

14
23%

20
40%zA

9
23%

17
23%

21

24%G

40%zFG

13
20%

95
58%

39
63%

24
48%

23
58%

47
64%

27
51%

34
52%

27

-55
-33%

-25
-40%

-4
-8%

-14
-35%

-30
-41%

-6
-11%

-21
-32%

-24
-71%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

3
9%
79%zEF

78%zM

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 25

Q.9. Summary Table. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?
Base : All Respondents
1. It meant
3. It meant
5. It helped to
that enough
that young
4. It meant
create jobs by
affordable
people and
building on
attracting
6. It meant an
homes were 2. It increases families could
greenfield
people and
increase in
provided for the demands on stay in the
i.e. land that businesses to
traffic and
local residents public services
district
is undeveloped
the area
congestion
Total

165

165

165

165

165

165

Strongly support

41
25%

10
6%

43
26%

4
2%

46
28%

5
3%

Tend to support

98
59%

86
52%

99
60%

33
20%

92
56%

35
21%

Neither support nor


oppose

19
12%

39
24%

19
12%

33
20%

19
12%

30
18%

Tend to oppose

5
3%

24
15%

2
1%

63
38%

7
4%

67
41%

Strongly oppose

2
1%

6
4%

2
1%

31
19%

1
1%

28
17%

Don't know

1
1%

SUPPORT

139
84%

96
58%

142
86%

37
22%

138
84%

40
24%

7
4%

30
18%

4
2%

94
57%

8
5%

95
58%

132
80%

66
40%

138
84%

-57
-35%

130
79%

-55
-33%

OPPOSE
NET SUPPORT

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 26

Q.10.1. Still thinking about the whole of the Canterbury district area, do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
There is enough housing in the district of Canterbury for people to live in decent homes they can afford
Base : All

Student residence
Total
(z)
Total

On campus
(a)

165

100

Off campus
(b)
65*

Year of study
1st year
(c)
64*

2nd year
(d)

3rd/ final year


(e)

41*

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

45*

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)
15**

33*

Uni of Kent
(h)
128

Other uni
(i)
4**

Satisfied
(j)
156

Dissatisfied
(k)
6**

Support
(l)
118

Oppose
(m)
18**

Support
(n)
104

Oppose
(o)
21**

Strongly agree

12
7%

9
9%

3
5%

4
6%

2
5%

5
11%

1
7%

12
9%

11
7%

10
8%

1
6%

8
8%

2
10%

Tend to agree

50
30%

32
32%

18
28%

24
38%

12
29%

13
29%

1
7%

10
30%

40
31%

49
31%

1
17%

35
30%

8
44%

30
29%

9
43%

Neither agree nor


disagree

40
24%

27
27%

13
20%

19
30%

9
22%

7
16%

5
33%

8
24%

32
25%

37
24%

2
33%

28
24%

3
17%

22
21%

4
19%

Tend to disagree

35

16
16%

19

9
14%

9
22%

12
27%

5
33%

9
27%

24
19%

2
50%

33
21%

2
33%

25
21%

3
17%

24
23%

1
5%

5
11%

2
13%

4
12%

10
8%

1
25%

13
8%

1
17%

11
9%

1
6%

12
12%

2
10%

21%a

Strongly disagree

15
9%c

29%a

6
6%

9
14%

2
3%

15%c

Don't know

13
8%

10
10%

3
5%

6
9%

3
7%

3
7%

1
7%

2
6%

10
8%

1
25%

13
8%

9
8%

2
11%

8
8%

3
14%

AGREE

62
38%

41
41%

21
32%

28
44%

14
34%

18
40%

2
13%

10
30%

52
41%

60
38%

1
17%

45
38%

9
50%

38
37%

11
52%

DISAGREE

50

22
22%

28

11
17%

15

17

30%ac

37%c

38%c

7
47%

13
39%

34
27%

3
75%

46
29%

3
50%

36
31%

4
22%

36
35%

3
14%

12

19

17

-1
-2%

1
2%

-5
-33%

-3
-9%

18

-2
-33%

9
8%

5
28%

2
2%

8
38%

NET AGREE

7%bdgn

19%zb

43%za

-7
-11%

27%zde

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

14%zg

-3
-75%

14
9%z

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 27

Q.10.1. Still thinking about the whole of the Canterbury district area, do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
There is enough housing in the district of Canterbury for people to live in decent homes they can afford
Base : All

Enough homes
Total
(z)
Total
Strongly agree

23**

21**

20%zD

1
6%

2
6%

4
5%

5
24%

3
9%

6
7%

3
13%

9%AJ

13
8%AB

62
38%BD

50
30%AF

12
7%EJ

32*

85*

Housing
(O)

1
3%

15

21**

Population
growth
(N)

5
8%

24%AB

87*

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

5
9%

81%zB

32*

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

50

17**

C
(J)

74*

21%AF

NET AGREE

B
(I)

30%B

34*

A
(H)

40*

50

66*

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

19%zB

53*

The same
(F)

50*

35

DISAGREE

Future development
More homes
(E)

12

Tend to disagree

AGREE

Disagree
(D)

62*

40

Don't know

Agree
(C)

12

Neither agree nor


disagree

Strongly disagree

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

165
7%D

Tend to agree

Agree
(A)

14
35%

19
26%

11
21%

23
35%

12
35%

4
24%

11
34%

24
28%

7
33%

8
25%

25
29%

6
26%

9
43%

7
18%

16
22%

11
21%

18
27%

11
32%

4
24%

8
25%

24
28%

3
14%

10
31%

21
25%

5
22%

4
19%

35

6
15%

21
28%

17

8
12%

4
12%

3
18%

5
16%

25
29%z

2
10%

5
16%

18
21%

6
26%

5
24%

15

12

7
13%

6
9%

2
6%

2
12%

3
9%

4
5%

4
19%

4
13%

8
9%

1
4%

1
5%

6
8%

2
4%

6
9%

4
12%

3
18%

3
9%

6
7%

2
6%

7
8%

2
9%

2
10%

62

19
26%

16
30%

28
42%

13
38%

5
29%

13
41%

28
32%

12
57%

11
34%

31
36%

9
39%

9
43%

33

24

45%zC

45%zFG

14
21%

6
18%

5
29%

8
25%

29
33%

6
29%

9
28%

26
31%

7
30%

6
29%

0
0%

-1
-1%

6
29%

2
6%

5
6%

2
9%

3
14%

100%zB

62
100%zB

70%zA
30%zA

50
100%zA

-50
-100%

2
5%
3
8%
22
55%zD

8
20%
14
35%z

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

16%z

-14
-19%

32%zFG

-8
-15%

14
21%zE

21%z

16%J

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 28

Q.10.2. Still thinking about the whole of the Canterbury district area, do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
New housing developments would help to improve the local economy
Base : All

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

Oppose
(m)

Oppose
(o)

41*

45*

15**

33*

18**

104

21**

8
13%

8
20%

6
13%

3
20%

5
15%

20
16%

23
15%

22
19%

21

83
50%

51
51%

32
49%

36
56%

20
49%

20
44%

7
47%

15
45%

67
52%

1
25%

78
50%

5
83%

65
55%

7
39%

59
57%z

6
29%

Neither agree nor


disagree

33

21
21%

12
18%

12
19%

12
29%

8
18%

1
7%

8
24%

25
20%

31
20%

1
17%

19
16%

6
33%

15
14%

6
29%

Tend to disagree

17

10
10%

7
11%

11%d

13%d

4
27%

2
6%

13
10%

2
50%

17
11%

9
8%

4
22%

7
7%

8
38%

10%dn

118

Support
(n)

64*

20%ln

6**

Support
(l)

8
12%

Tend to agree

156

Dissatisfied
(k)

65*

165

4**

Satisfied
(j)

17
17%

Strongly agree

128

Other uni
(i)

25
15%

Total

100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study

20%z

Strongly disagree

2
1%

2
3%

2
4%

1
3%

1
1%

2
1%

1
6%

1
5%

Don't know

1
1%

4
6%

1
2%

1
2%

3
7%

2
6%

2
2%

1
25%

5
3%

3
3%

2
2%

108
65%

68
68%

40
62%

44
69%

28
68%

26
58%

10
67%

20
61%

87
68%

1
25%

101
65%

5
83%

19

10
10%

9
14%

11%d

18%d

4
27%

3
9%

14
11%

2
50%

19
12%

58
58%

31
48%

37
58%

18
40%

6
40%

17
52%

73
57%

-1
-25%

82
53%

5
83%

3%ah

AGREE
DISAGREE

12%dln

NET AGREE

89
54%e

28
68%ze

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

87
74%z

7
39%

9
8%

5
28%

78
66%z

2
11%

80
77%z

6
29%

7
7%

9
43%

73
70%z

-3
-14%

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 29

Q.10.2. Still thinking about the whole of the Canterbury district area, do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
New housing developments would help to improve the local economy
Base : All

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

165

62*

50*

40*

25

9
18%

14

15%DI

14
23%

Tend to agree

83
50%

27
44%

26
52%

20
50%

Neither agree nor


disagree

33

11
18%

6
12%

Tend to disagree

17

6
10%

7
14%

Total
Strongly agree

20%E
10%CFJ

Future development
More homes
(E)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

B
(I)

66*

26%zFG

7
11%

2
6%

2
12%

1
3%

39
53%

29
55%

35
53%

12
35%

8
47%

4
10%

17
23%

5
9%

1
3%

10
14%

5
9%

3
5%

17
26%E

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)
32*

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

87*

21**

85*

23**

21**

17%I

7
33%

3
9%

17
20%

3
13%

1
5%

14
44%

47
54%

11
52%

14
44%

42
49%

12
52%

14
67%

3
18%

10
31%

17
20%

1
5%

6
19%

16
19%

7
30%

2
10%

5
16%

5
6%

2
10%

24%zF

4
24%

7
8%

1
4%

1
5%

32*

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

15

26%E

17**

C
(J)

14

5
7%

34*

A
(H)

53*

35%zD

74*

The same
(F)

25%zM

Strongly disagree

2
1%

2
4%

1
3%

1
1%

1
2%

1
3%

1
1%

2
2%

Don't know

5
3%

4
6%

2
3%

3
5%

2
6%

2
6%

2
2%

1
3%

1
1%

3
14%

41
66%

35
70%

34

44
59%

43

42

81%zFG

64%G

14
41%

10
59%

15
47%

71%I

18
86%

17
53%

59
69%

15
65%

15
71%

6
10%

9
18%

4
24%

5
16%

6
7%

2
10%

26%zEF

25%z

9
11%

1
4%

1
5%

35
56%

26
52%

5
15%

6
35%

10
31%

16
76%

9
28%

14
61%

14
67%

AGREE

108
65%GI

DISAGREE

19
12%J

NET AGREE

89
54%DGIL

85%zD

2
5%
32
80%zD

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

11
15%
33
45%

5
9%

4
6%

38

38

72%zG

58%G

62

56
64%zI

50
59%L

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 30

Q.10.3. Still thinking about the whole of the Canterbury district area, do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
New homes should not be built unless new infrastructure such as roads and bus routes are provided
Base : All

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

Support
(n)

41*

45*

15**

33*

20
31%

18
44%

18
40%

5
33%

10
30%

47
37%

4
100%

58
37%

2
33%

47
40%

7
39%

41
39%

5
24%

Tend to agree

67
41%

43
43%

24
37%

26
41%

16
39%

19
42%

6
40%

14
42%

53
41%

62
40%

4
67%

45
38%

7
39%

41
39%

10
48%

Neither agree nor


disagree

24
15%

14
14%

10
15%

12
19%

5
12%

5
11%

2
13%

7
21%

17
13%

24
15%

15
13%

3
17%

14
13%

4
19%

Tend to disagree

9
5%

7
7%

2
3%

4
6%

2
5%

1
2%

2
13%

2
6%

7
5%

8
5%

7
6%

1
6%

5
5%

1
5%

Strongly disagree

2
1%

1
1%

1
2%

2
4%

2
2%

2
1%

2
2%

1
1%

1
5%

Don't know

2
1%

2
2%

2
3%

2
2%

2
1%

2
2%

2
2%

128
78%

76
76%

52
80%

46
72%

34
83%

37
82%

11
73%

24
73%

100
78%

11
7%

8
8%

3
5%

4
6%

2
5%

3
7%

2
13%

2
6%

117
71%

68
68%

49
75%

42
66%

32
78%

34
76%

9
60%

22
67%

*=Less than 0.5 %


Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

18**

104

Oppose
(o)

64*

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

118

Oppose
(m)

28
43%

NET AGREE

6**

Support
(l)

65*

DISAGREE

156

Dissatisfied
(k)

33
33%

AGREE

4**

Satisfied
(j)

61
37%

165

128

Other uni
(i)

Strongly agree

Total

100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study

21**

4
100%

120
77%

6
100%

92
78%

14
78%

82
79%

15
71%

9
7%

10
6%

9
8%

1
6%

6
6%

2
10%

91
71%

4
100%

110
71%

6
100%

83
70%

13
72%

76
73%

13
62%

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 31

Q.10.3. Still thinking about the whole of the Canterbury district area, do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
New homes should not be built unless new infrastructure such as roads and bus routes are provided
Base : All

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

165

62*

50*

40*

74*

53*

66*

34*

17**

32*

87*

21**

32*

85*

23**

21**

61

25
50%z

16
40%

30
41%

25

37%F

27
44%

47%F

15
23%

14
41%

5
29%

8
25%

35
40%

9
43%

11
34%

34
40%

10
43%

6
29%

Tend to agree

67
41%

21
34%

20
40%

14
35%

32
43%

20
38%

30
45%

13
38%

8
47%

16
50%

33
38%

7
33%

15
47%

31
36%

8
35%

10
48%

Neither agree nor


disagree

24

9
15%

2
4%

5
13%

8
11%

7
13%

12
18%

4
12%

3
18%

7
22%

11
13%

2
10%

3
9%

14
16%

2
9%

4
19%

Tend to disagree

9
5%M

2
3%

3
6%

4
10%

2
3%

1
2%

6
9%

2
6%

1
6%

1
3%

6
7%

1
5%

3
9%

2
2%

3
13%

1
5%

Strongly disagree

2
1%

2
3%

1
3%

1
1%

1
2%

1
3%

1
1%

1
5%

2
2%

Don't know

2
1%

1
2%

1
1%

2
3%

1
1%

1
5%

2
2%

48
77%

45

30
75%

62
84%

45

90%z

85%F

45
68%

27
79%

13
76%

24
75%

68
78%

16
76%

26
81%

65
76%

18
78%

16
76%

3
6%

5
13%

3
4%

1
2%

7
11%

3
9%

1
6%

1
3%

7
8%

2
10%

3
9%

4
5%

3
13%

1
5%

38
58%

24
71%

12
71%

23
72%

61
70%

14
67%

23
72%

61
72%

15
65%

15
71%

Total
Strongly agree

AGREE

15%B

128
78%F

DISAGREE
NET AGREE

11
7%
117
71%F

4
6%
44
71%

42
84%z

25
63%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

59

44

80%zC

83%zF

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 32

Q.10.4. Still thinking about the whole of the Canterbury district area, do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Building more homes will bring more and better facilities and amenities to this area
Base : All

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

4**

Satisfied
(j)
156

Dissatisfied
(k)

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

Oppose
(o)

65*

64*

41*

45*

15**

33*

6**

118

18**

104

21**

19
19%

9
14%

11
17%

6
15%

7
16%

4
27%

4
12%

23
18%

1
25%

26
17%

1
17%

27

26

23%z

25%z

Tend to agree

76
46%

47
47%

29
45%

31
48%

23
56%

19
42%

3
20%

17
52%

58
45%

1
25%

71
46%

4
67%

56
47%

8
44%

47
45%

7
33%

Neither agree nor


disagree

35
21%

21
21%

14
22%

12
19%

8
20%

11
24%

4
27%

8
24%

27
21%

34
22%

1
17%

22
19%

2
11%

21
20%

3
14%

Tend to disagree

20

12

7
11%

3
7%

7
16%

3
20%

3
9%

15
12%

2
50%

19
12%

12
10%

4
22%

9
9%

7
33%

4
22%

4
19%

165

128

Other uni
(i)

28
17%

Total
Strongly agree

100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study

12%a

8
8%

Strongly disagree

5
3%

4
4%

1
2%

2
3%

1
2%

1
2%

1
7%

1
3%

4
3%

5
3%

Don't know

1
1%

1
1%

1
2%

1
1%

1
1%

1
1%

104
63%

66
66%

38
58%

42
66%

29
71%

26
58%

7
47%

21
64%

81
63%

2
50%

97
62%

5
83%

25
15%ln

12
12%

13
20%

9
14%

4
10%

8
18%

4
27%

4
12%

19
15%

2
50%

24
15%

79
48%

54
54%

25
38%

33
52%

25
61%

18
40%

3
20%

17
52%

62
48%

0
0%

73
47%

5
83%

AGREE
DISAGREE
NET AGREE

18%a

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

83

70%z

8
44%

12
10%

8
44%

71
60%z

0
0%

1
1%
73

70%z

7
33%

9
9%

11
52%

64
62%z

-4
-19%

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 33

Q.10.4. Still thinking about the whole of the Canterbury district area, do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Building more homes will bring more and better facilities and amenities to this area
Base : All

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Housing
(O)

62*

50*

40*

74*

53*

66*

34*

17**

87*

21**

85*

23**

21**

28
17%D

10
16%

10
20%

10
25%

8
11%

13
25%

8
12%

4
12%

2
12%

3
9%

14
16%

8
38%

3
9%

19
22%

3
13%

3
14%

Tend to agree

76
46%

32
52%

21
42%

16
40%

32
43%

24
45%

34
52%

13
38%

5
29%

16
50%

43
49%

9
43%

18
56%

36
42%

12
52%

8
38%

Neither agree nor


disagree

35
21%

12
19%

10
20%

7
18%

20
27%

9
17%

17
26%

8
24%

3
18%

8
25%

20
23%

3
14%

4
13%

17
20%

5
22%

8
38%

Tend to disagree

20
12%

7
11%

8
16%

3
8%

13
18%

6
11%

5
8%

6
18%

4
24%

4
13%

9
10%

1
5%

6
19%

9
11%

2
9%

2
10%

Strongly disagree

5
3%

1
2%

1
2%

1
1%

1
2%

1
2%

3
9%

3
18%

1
3%

1
3%

3
4%

1
4%

1
1%

1
2%

1
1%

1
1%

63%D

42
68%

31
62%

26
65%

40
54%

37
70%

42
64%

17
50%

7
41%

19
59%

57
66%

17
81%

21
66%

55
65%

15
65%

11
52%

25
15%

8
13%

9
18%

7
18%

14
19%

7
13%

6
9%

7
41%

5
16%

9
10%

1
5%

7
22%

12
14%

3
13%

2
10%

79

34
55%

22
44%

19
48%

26
35%

30

36
55%G

0
0%

14
44%

48

57%G

16
76%

14
44%

43
51%

12
52%

9
43%

Don't know
AGREE
DISAGREE
NET AGREE

104

48%DG

4
10%zD

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

26%F

8
24%

55%z

32*

Population
growth
(N)

165

Total
Strongly agree

32*

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 34

Q.10. Summary Table. Still thinking about the whole of the Canterbury district area, do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Base : All Respondents
1. There is
enough housing
in the district
of Canterbury 2. New housing
for people to
developments
live in decent
would help to
homes they can improve the
afford
local economy
Total

165

165

3. New homes
should not be
4. Building
built unless more homes will
new
bring more and
infrastructure
better
such as roads
facilities and
and bus routes
amenities to
are provided
this area
165

165

Strongly agree

12
7%

25
15%

61
37%

28
17%

Tend to agree

50
30%

83
50%

67
41%

76
46%

Neither agree nor


disagree

40
24%

33
20%

24
15%

35
21%

Tend to disagree

35
21%

17
10%

9
5%

20
12%

Strongly disagree

15
9%

2
1%

2
1%

5
3%

Don't know

13
8%

5
3%

2
1%

1
1%

AGREE

62
38%

108
65%

128
78%

104
63%

DISAGREE

50
30%

19
12%

11
7%

25
15%

NET AGREE

12
7%

89
54%

117
71%

79
48%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 35

Q.11. Canterbury City Council has to make some important decisions about local development in the whole of the district and how many new homes it allows to be built for the next twenty years.
Which, if any, of these best describes your view about how much house building the Council should allow?
Base : All Respondents

Student residence
Total
(z)
Total

On campus
(a)

165

100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study
1st year
(c)

65*

64*

2nd year
(d)
41*

6
6%

5
8%

6
9%

25
25%

17
26%

12
19%

16

25%j

About the same as in the


past

66
40%

38
38%

28
43%

A little less than in


the past

28

22

17%bn

22%zb

A lot more than in the


past

11
7%

A little more than in


the past

42

2
5%

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)
45*

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)
15**

33*

Uni of Kent
(h)
128

Other uni
(i)
4**

Satisfied
(j)
156

Dissatisfied
(k)
6**

Support
(l)
118

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

18**

104

Oppose
(o)
21**

2
4%

1
7%

4
12%

7
5%

10
6%

1
17%

8
7%

8
8%

39%zc

10
22%

4
27%

9
27%

31
24%

2
50%

37
24%

3
50%

32
27%

4
22%

30
29%

3
14%

28
44%

14
34%

19
42%

5
33%

12
36%

54
42%

64
41%

1
17%

49
42%

4
22%

45
43%

5
24%

6
9%

11
17%

6
15%

9
20%

2
13%

4
12%

24
19%

28
18%

18
15%

7
39%

13
13%

10
48%

2
13%

4
12%zh

1
1%

1
25%

6
4%

2
2%

2
11%

2
2%

2
10%

3
2%

3
3%

2
2%

1
25%

1
1%

1
1%

1
1%

A lot less than in the


past

6
4%hl

3
3%

3
5%

2
3%

2
4%

It depends

3
2%

3
3%

2
3%

1
2%

3
2%

None of these

1
1%

1
2%

1
2%

Don't know

8
5%

3
3%

5
8%

2
3%

2
5%

3
7%

1
7%

8
6%

7
4%

1
17%

5
4%

1
6%

3
3%

1
5%

31
31%

22
34%

18
28%

18
44%

12
27%

5
33%

13
39%

38
30%

2
50%

47
30%

4
67%

40
34%

4
22%

38
37%

3
14%

25
25%

9
14%

13
20%

6
15%

11
24%

4
27%

8
24%

25
20%

1
25%

34
22%

20
17%

9
50%

15
14%

12
57%

1
2%

1
7%

5
15%

13
10%

1
25%

13
8%

4
67%

MORE THAN IN THE PAST

53
32%j

LESS THAN IN THE PAST

34
21%n

NET MORE

19
12%aej

6
6%

13
20%za

5
8%

12
29%zce

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

20
17%z

-5
-28%

23
22%z

-9
-43%

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 36

Q.11. Canterbury City Council has to make some important decisions about local development in the whole of the district and how many new homes it allows to be built for the next twenty years.
Which, if any, of these best describes your view about how much house building the Council should allow?
Base : All Respondents

Enough homes
Total
(z)
Total

Agree
(A)

165

62*
5
8%

A lot more than in the


past

11

A little more than in


the past

42

About the same as in the


past

66

A little less than in


the past

17%BEFJM

21%B

7%F

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)
50*
4
8%

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)
40*

Future development
More homes
(E)

74*

The same
(F)

A
(H)

B
(I)

34*

23**

21**

1
6%

1
3%

3
3%

6
29%

1
3%

6
7%

3
13%

6
35%

5
16%

26
30%

5
24%

8
25%

22
26%

5
22%

7
33%

2
12%

17
53%

42
48%z

4
19%

9
28%

40
47%

6
26%

9
43%

28

5
29%

6
19%

9
10%

4
19%

9
28%M

8
9%

7
30%

4
19%

2
12%

1
3%

1
5%

3
9%

2
2%

1
4%

24
32%

42

40%BEG

28
45%

14
28%

19
48%

25
34%

28

13

3
6%

3
8%

15
20%

79%zFG

66
100%zEG

82%zEF

85*

A lot less than in the


past

6
4%

3
6%

2
5%

4
5%

It depends

3
2%

1
2%

1
2%

1
3%

1
6%

1
3%

1
1%

1
3%

1
4%

1
5%

None of these

1
1%

1
2%

1
1%

1
1%

Don't know

8
5%

4
6%

4
8%

2
5%

3
4%

1
3%

5
6%

1
5%

1
3%

6
7%

53

7
41%

6
19%

29
33%

11
52%

9
28%

28
33%

8
35%

7
33%

34

7
41%

7
22%

9
10%

5
24%

12

10
12%

8
35%

4
19%

0
0%

-1
-3%

20

6
29%

-3
-9%

0
0%

3
14%

MORE THAN IN THE PAST

53
32%FG

LESS THAN IN THE PAST

34
21%EFJM

NET MORE

19
12%AIL

16
26%

24
48%zA

13
33%

27
36%

13
21%

6
12%

5
13%

19
26%

18

8
20%

8
11%

3
5%

36%zA

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

100%zFG

53
100%zG

0
0%

32*

Housing
(O)

66*

9
23%

21**

Population
growth
(N)

11

40%zA

87*

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

53*

20

32*

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

3
4%

21%zFG

17**

C
(J)

4
10%

11
18%

25%FG

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

18%zEF

100%zEF

-34
-100%

23%zI

38%zM

18
21%zL

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 37

Q.12. Still thinking about the whole of the district of Canterbury, and taking your answer from this card, which of these options, if any, do you think the Council should chose?
Base : All Respondents

Student residence
On campus
(a)

Total
(z)
Total
Option A

165
17
10%
l

Off campus
(b)

Year of study
1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
student/ postgrad
(f)

Uni of
Canterbury
Christchurch
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

Other uni
(i)
4**
2%**

Satisfied
(j)
156
95%

Dissatisfied
(k)
6**
4%**

Support
(l)
118
72%

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

18**
11%**

104
63%

Oppose
(o)

100
61%

65*
39%*

64*
39%*

41*
25%*

45*
27%*

15**
9%**

33*
20%*

128
78%

21**
13%**

12
12%
71%

5
8%
29%

10
16%
59%

3
7%
18%

3
7%
18%

1
7%
6%

4
12%
24%

12
9%
71%

1
25%
6%

16
10%
94%

8
7%
47%

6
33%
35%

8
8%
47%

7
33%
41%

Option B

32
19%

21
21%
66%

11
17%
34%

12
19%
38%

9
22%
28%

5
11%
16%

6
40%
19%

4
12%
13%

27
21%
84%

1
25%
3%

32
21%
100%

21
18%
66%

4
22%
13%

16
15%
50%

6
29%
19%

Option C

87
53%

47
47%
54%

40
62%
46%

31
48%
36%

25
61%
29%

25
56%
29%

6
40%
7%

17
52%
20%

69
54%
79%

1
25%
1%

80
51%
92%

5
83%
6%

66
56%
76%

5
28%
6%

58
56%
67%

4
19%
5%

Option D

21
13%

16
16%
76%

5
8%
24%

10
16%
48%

3
7%
14%

6
13%
29%

2
13%
10%

7
21%
33%

14
11%
67%

20
13%
95%

1
17%
5%

19
16%
90%

19
18%

1
5%
5%

4
4%
67%

2
3%
33%

1
2%
17%

5
11%
83%zc

1
3%
17%

5
4%
83%

6
4%
100%

2
2%
33%

3
17%
50%

1
1%
17%

3
14%
50%

2
3%
100%

1
2%
50%

1
2%
50%

1
1%
50%

1
25%
50%

2
1%
100%

2
2%
100%

2
2%
100%

None of these options

6
4%
ln

Don't know

2
1%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

90%z

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 38

Q.12. Still thinking about the whole of the district of Canterbury, and taking your answer from this card, which of these options, if any, do you think the Council should chose?
Base : All Respondents

Enough homes
Agree
(A)

Total
(z)
Total
Option A

Option B

Option C

Option D

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

62*
38%*

50*
30%*

40*
24%*

74*
45%*

53*
32%*

66*
40%*

34*
21%*

17
10%
FJM

5
8%
29%

5
10%
29%

6
15%
35%

8
11%
47%

7
13%

2
3%
12%

7
21%

41%F

32
19%
JM

13
21%
41%

8
16%
25%

5
13%
16%

14
19%
44%

6
11%
19%

17
26%
53%

29
58%
33%

21
53%
24%

39
53%
45%

29
55%

42
64%

GIL

28
45%
32%

33%G

12
19%
57%

6
12%
29%

6
15%
29%

9
12%
43%

11
21%

FIJL

165

87
53%
21
13%

52%zF

A
(H)

B
(I)

87*
53%*

17
100%
100%

7
21%
22%

32
100%

48%zG

9
26%
10%

4
6%
19%

5
15%
24%

Housing
(O)

23**
14%**

21**
13%**

10
31%

2
2%
12%

2
9%
12%

2
10%
12%

13
41%

5
6%
16%

6
26%
19%

7
33%
22%

87
100%

5
16%
6%

61
72%

100%zI

11
48%
13%

10
48%
11%

21
100%
100%

15
18%

4
17%
19%

2
10%
10%

3
9%
50%

2
2%
33%

1
3%
50%

3
5%
50%

2
4%
33%

1
3%
17%

3
4%
50%

1
2%
17%

5
15%
83%zEF

Don't know

2
1%

1
2%
50%

1
3%
50%

1
1%
50%

1
3%
50%

100%zJ

21**
13%**

Population
growth
(N)

85*
52%*

6
4%

*=Less than 0.5 %


Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)
32*
19%*

None of these options

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

32*
19%*

41%zF

17**
10%**

C
(J)

59%zM

41%zM

70%zL

71%L

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 39

Q.13a. What are your main reasons for choosing Option ...?
Base : All Respondents who selected an option at Q12

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

Off campus
(b)

Year of study
1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

3**

Satisfied
(j)

Total

157

96*

61*

63*

40*

39*

15**

32*

Support/ positives

106

61

45

42

27

28

20

84

68%

64%

74%

67%

68%

72%

60%

63%

69%

67%

67%

7
4%

6
6%

1
2%

5
8%

1
3%

1
7%

1
3%

6
5%

9
9%

1
2%

8
13%zd

1
3%

1
7%

1
3%

8
7%

Better local economy/


economic conditions

122

Other uni
(i)
2

148
99

Dissatisfied
(k)
6**
5

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

114

83%

83
73%z

7
5%

1
33%

10
7%

Support
(n)

15**
6

101

Oppose
(o)
18**

40%

75
74%z

50%

4
4%

4
4%

5
4%

2
13%

4
4%

2
11%

1
7%

16
16%

4
22%

Brownfield development/
minimal impact on
Greenfield sites

10

Homes/ houses
[affordable housing] are
needed

21
13%

11
11%

10
16%

8
13%

4
10%

6
15%

3
20%

5
16%

15
12%

1
33%

21
14%

17
15%

Good infrastructure/
facilities [schools/
transport/ roads/
hospitals]

Growth/ potential/
steady/ sustainable
growth [nsf]

11
7%

8
8%

3
5%

4
6%

1
3%

1
3%

10
8%

10
7%

9
8%

8
8%

More jobs/ job growth/


employment opportunities

68
43%

40
42%

28
46%

29
46%

17
43%

19
49%

3
20%

12
38%

55
45%

1
33%

63
43%

3
50%

52
46%

5
33%

48
48%

5
28%

More opportunity for the


youth/ future
generations

2
3%

1
3%

1
7%

1
1%

1
33%

1
1%

1
17%

2
2%

1
1%

Other options won't


work/ best option/ least
impact

10
6%

6
6%

4
7%

5
8%

1
3%

3
8%

1
7%

3
9%

7
6%

10
7%

10
9%

10
10%z

Support for increase in


population/ more people/
families/ students

24
15%

13
14%

11
18%

11
17%

4
10%

7
18%

2
13%

6
19%

18
15%

22
15%

2
33%

20
18%

1
7%

17
17%

2
11%

Support/ Positive other

6%b

1%j

15%z

36

22

14

15

35

22

23%

23%

23%

24%

23%

21%

27%

28%

21%

33%

24%

19%

47%

22%

39%

Building more houses


won't create jobs/
growth/ improve the
economy

5
3%

3
3%

2
3%

2
3%

2
5%

1
7%

2
6%

3
2%

4
3%

3
3%

1
7%

3
3%

1
6%

Concerns about
infrastructure/
facilities/ resources
[schools/ transport/
roads/ hospitals]

2
1%

1
1%

1
2%

1
3%

1
7%

2
2%

2
1%

2
2%

2
2%

Concerns about the type


of people who may come
into the area

Opposition/ negatives

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

26

22

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 39

Q.13a. What are your main reasons for choosing Option ...?
Base : All Respondents who selected an option at Q12

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

Off campus
(b)

Year of study
1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

Oppose
(m)

63*

40*

39*

15**

32*

Empty homes/ fill empty


council houses/ renovate
existing properties
first

1
1%

1
2%

1
3%

1
1%

1
1%

1
7%

Greenfield development/
environmental impact/
spoiling the areas
natural beauty

18
11%

11
11%

7
11%

7
11%

5
13%

5
13%

1
7%

5
16%

13
11%

18
12%

11
10%

4
27%

11
11%

4
22%

Overcrowding/ densely
populated/ too many
students

10
6%

7
7%

3
5%

3
5%

5
13%

1
3%

1
7%

1
3%

8
7%

1
33%

9
6%

6
5%

2
13%

7
7%

2
11%

Overdevelopment/ already
enough homes/ lack of
space

8
5%

4
4%

4
7%

3
5%

2
5%

2
5%

1
7%

1
3%

7
6%

7
5%

6
5%

2
13%

5
5%

1
6%

Rapid/ unsustainable/
expansion/ growth

4
3%

3
3%

1
2%

1
2%

2
5%

1
7%

4
3%

4
3%

4
4%

4
4%

Don't agree with the


figures quoted

Opposition other

1
1%

1
2%

1
2%

1
3%

1
1%

16

18**

30

21

21

29

22%

15%

16%

18%

18%

40%

28%

17%

20%

17%

19%

13%

16%

28%

Need to get the balance


right/ find the middle
ground

9
6%

8
8%

1
2%

3
5%

2
5%

1
3%

3
20%

1
3%

8
7%

9
6%

7
6%

1
7%

6
6%

2
11%

Maintain status quo/


consistancy/ continue to
develop as currently

4
3%

4
4%

3
5%

1
3%

4
3%

4
3%

3
3%

1
1%

1
6%

Spread the new homes out


and it should be OK

This is about the right


number of new homes/ not
too many new homes

14

4
6%

3
8%

5
13%

2
13%

6
5%

13
9%

1
17%

10
9%

7
7%

1
6%

8
13%

101

19%

Neutral

22

15**

Oppose
(o)

61*

114

Support
(n)

10

6**

Support
(l)

96*

148

Dissatisfied
(k)

157

3**

Satisfied
(j)

Concerns about the type


of properties being
built

Total

122

Other uni
(i)

9%h

6
6%

There'll be no
significant increase/
reduction of jobs

There'll be no
significant increase/
reduction in population

3
2%

3
3%

2
5%

1
7%

3
2%

3
2%

2
2%

1
7%

2
2%

1
6%

There are enough jobs


here/ no unemployment
problems

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

25%zh

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 39

Q.13a. What are your main reasons for choosing Option ...?
Base : All Respondents who selected an option at Q12

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

Off campus
(b)

Year of study
1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

96*

61*

63*

40*

39*

15**

32*

We need more
information/ to take
stock before launching
ahead

Other

2
1%

1
1%

1
2%

1
2%

1
3%

1
1%

Don't know

1
1%

1
1%

1
2%

No answer/ none/ no
reason

2
1%

1
1%

1
2%

1
3%

1
7%

1
3%

Total

157

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

122

Other uni
(i)
3**
-

Satisfied
(j)
148

Dissatisfied
(k)
6**

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

114

Support
(n)

15**

101

Oppose
(o)
18**

1
33%

2
1%

1
1%

1
1%

1
1%

1
1%

1
1%

2
1%

1
7%

1
6%

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 40

Q.13a. What are your main reasons for choosing Option ...?
Base : All Respondents who selected an option at Q12

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

Option selection

The same
(F)

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Total

157

58*

48*

38*

70*

53*

65*

28**

Support/ positives

106
68%I

40

37

24

52

39

47

12

69%

77%

63%

74%

74%

72%

43%

18%

50%

7
4%

1
2%

4
8%

2
5%

2
3%

2
4%

4
6%

1
4%

Brownfield development/
minimal impact on
Greenfield sites

10
6%

4
7%

3
6%

1
3%

3
4%

3
6%

5
8%

Homes/ houses
[affordable housing] are
needed

21

8
14%

10
21%

4
11%

12
17%

6
9%

2
7%

3
8%

4
6%

2
4%

Better local economy/


economic conditions

13%JM

Good infrastructure/
facilities [schools/
transport/ roads/
hospitals]

Growth/ potential/
steady/ sustainable
growth [nsf]

11
7%

More jobs/ job growth/


employment opportunities

68

More opportunity for the


youth/ future
generations

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

17**

32*

87*

21**

28**

83*

23**

16

67
77%zI

20

13

16

12

95%

46%

65
78%z

70%

57%

1
3%

4
5%

2
10%

6
7%

1
5%

1
6%

2
6%

6
7%

1
5%

3
11%

6
7%

1
5%

2
12%

6
19%

6
7%

7
33%

5
18%

7
8%

4
17%

5
24%

12%z

3
9%

7
8%

1
5%

2
7%

7
8%

1
4%

1
5%

15
71%

4
14%

49

57%zI

11
48%

4
19%

1
5%

30
52%

22
46%

16
42%

33
47%

23
43%

31
48%

8
29%

3
9%

2
1%

1
2%

2
3%

2
4%

1
3%

1
1%

1
4%

50

59%z

21**

2
3%

5
10%

3
8%

5
7%

5
9%

1
2%

4
14%

2
6%

8
9%

4
5%

4
17%

2
10%

24
15%

12
21%

6
13%

5
13%

15
21%

7
13%

14
22%

3
11%

3
9%

14
16%

7
33%

3
11%

17
20%

3
13%

1
5%

10

Support for increase in


population/ more people/
families/ students

Opposition/ negatives

23%zF

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

43%I

Other options won't


work/ best option/ least
impact

Support/ Positive other

10%B

12

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

6%F

36
23%JM

11

13

12

13

10

12

19%

11

19%

29%

19%

23%

20%

36%

71%

11
34%J

13

16

10

15%

57%

12%

13%

24%

Building more houses


won't create jobs/
growth/ improve the
economy

5
3%

1
2%

2
4%

1
3%

3
4%

1
2%

2
3%

2
7%

3
18%

1
3%

1
1%

3
11%

1
1%

1
5%

Concerns about
infrastructure/
facilities/ resources
[schools/ transport/
roads/ hospitals]

2
1%

2
4%

2
3%

1
2%

1
4%

1
3%

1
1%

1
1%

1
5%

Concerns about the type


of people who may come
into the area

Concerns about the type


of properties being
built

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 40

Q.13a. What are your main reasons for choosing Option ...?
Base : All Respondents who selected an option at Q12

Enough homes
Total
(z)
Total
Empty homes/ fill empty
council houses/ renovate
existing properties
first

157
1
1%

Greenfield development/
environmental impact/
spoiling the areas
natural beauty

18

Overcrowding/ densely
populated/ too many
students

10

11%M

6%JM

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

58*

48*

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

Option selection

The same
(F)

Less homes
(G)

65*

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)
32*

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

38*

70*

53*

28**

17**

87*

21**

28**

83*

23**

21**

1
2%

1
2%

1
3%

4
7%

4
8%

4
11%

5
7%

6
11%

8
12%

4
14%

4
24%

5
16%

9
10%

10
36%

5
6%

2
10%

2
3%

4
8%

1
3%

6
9%

3
6%

2
3%

5
18%

4
24%

4
13%J

2
2%

3
11%

2
2%

3
13%

2
10%

2
12%

19%zJ

3
11%

1
1%

1
4%

2
10%

Overdevelopment/ already
enough homes/ lack of
space

8
5%JM

4
7%

3
6%

1
3%

4
6%

3
6%

3
5%

2
7%

Rapid/ unsustainable/
expansion/ growth

4
3%

1
2%

1
2%

3
8%z

1
1%

1
2%

2
3%

1
6%

3
3%

1
4%

3
4%

Don't agree with the


figures quoted

Opposition other

1
1%

1
2%

1
3%

1
2%

1
6%

30

14

19%

24%

13%

16%

19%

11%

25%

21%

12%

Need to get the balance


right/ find the middle
ground

9
6%

3
5%

4
8%

2
5%

5
7%

3
6%

3
5%

2
7%

1
6%

Maintain status quo/


consistancy/ continue to
develop as currently

4
3%

1
2%

2
3%

2
3%

2
7%

Spread the new homes out


and it should be OK

This is about the right


number of new homes/ not
too many new homes

14

1
2%

3
8%

5
7%

2
4%

Neutral

9%B

16%zB

13

16

10
15%zE

11
34%zJ

17%

15

10%

11%

17%

14

22%

38%

2
6%

5
6%

1
5%

1
4%

5
6%

1
4%

2
10%

3
9%zJ

1
1%

2
7%

2
2%

1
4%

1
6%

4
13%

9
10%

6
7%

2
9%

6
29%

There'll be no
significant increase/
reduction of jobs

There'll be no
significant increase/
reduction in population

3
2%

1
2%

1
2%

1
3%

1
1%

1
2%

1
2%

1
4%

2
6%J

1
5%

1
1%

2
9%

There are enough jobs


here/ no unemployment
problems

We need more
information/ to take
stock before launching
ahead

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 40

Q.13a. What are your main reasons for choosing Option ...?
Base : All Respondents who selected an option at Q12

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

38*

Future development
More homes
(E)

65*

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)
32*

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)
23**

Housing
(O)

28**

17**

87*

21**

28**

83*

1
2%

1
1%

1
2%

1
4%

1
6%

1
3%

2
9%

Don't know

1
1%

1
4%

1
1%

1
4%

No answer/ none/ no
reason

2
1%

1
1%

1
2%

1
4%

1
6%

1
1%

2
2%

*=Less than 0.5 %


Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

53*

Less homes
(G)

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

70*

Option selection

The same
(F)

2
1%

157

48*

Disagree
(D)

Other

Total

58*

Agree
(C)

21**

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 41

Q.13b. And what, if any, are the main concerns you would have about Option ... (Q12)?
Base : All Respondents who selected an option at Q12

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

Off campus
(b)

Year of study
1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

Oppose
(m)

114

Support
(n)

15**

101

Oppose
(o)

61*

63*

40*

39*

15**

32*

Disruption/ time to
complete construction

1
1%

1
1%

1
3%

1
1%

1
1%

Fill empty homes first/


develop Brownfield sites

2
1%

2
2%

1
2%

1
3%

1
3%

1
1%

2
1%

1
1%

1
7%

2
2%

Greenfield development/
environmental impact

57
36%

35
36%

22
36%

20
32%

14
35%

18
46%

5
33%

12
38%

43
35%

2
67%

53
36%

2
33%

45
39%

4
27%

38
38%

8
44%

Infrastucture/ roads/
schools/ resources/
amenities/ services etc

5
3%

3
3%

2
3%

2
3%

1
3%

2
5%

5
4%

5
3%

5
4%

5
5%

It needs to be
regulated/ controlled/
managed

1
1%

1
2%

1
3%

1
1%

1
1%

1
1%

1
1%

Jobs/ employment/
economic conditions

12
8%

8
8%

4
7%

6
10%

3
8%

2
5%

1
7%

1
3%

10
8%

1
33%

12
8%

10
9%

2
13%

6
6%

2
11%

1
1%

1
1%

1
2%

1
1%

1
1%

1
7%

1
6%

No concerns/ none

28
18%

16
17%

12
20%

13
21%

7
18%

5
13%

3
20%

8
25%

19
16%

1
33%

26
18%

2
33%

17
15%

2
13%

18
18%

1
6%

Not sure the figures


quoted are right/
concept is flawed

2
2%

1
3%

1
7%

1
3%

1
1%

1
1%

1
17%

2
2%

2
2%

6
10%

4
10%e

1
7%

3
9%

8
7%

10
7%

1
17%

10
9%

9
9%

2
5%

1
7%

2
6%

9
7%

9
6%

1
17%

8
7%

1
7%

5
5%

1
6%

1%j

6**

Support
(l)

96*

Might not be enough/ too


few homes being built

148

Dissatisfied
(k)

157

3**

Satisfied
(j)

Affordability/ house
prices

Total

122

Other uni
(i)

18**

Overcrowding/ traffic
congestion/ growth in
population

11
7%

7
7%

4
7%

Overdevelopment/ too
many houses/ not enough
space

11
7%a

2
2%

15%za

Population might not


rise/ might fall if
people leave area

2
1%

2
2%

1
2%

1
7%

2
2%

2
1%

2
2%

2
2%

Students/ type of people


coming to the area

4
3%

3
3%

1
2%

3
5%

1
3%

4
3%

4
3%

4
4%

3
3%

Sustainability

1
1%

1
1%

1
7%

1
1%

1
1%

1
1%

1
1%

Type/ quality/
desirability/ of homes
being built

6
4%ln

3
3%

3
5%

4
6%

2
5%

2
6%

4
3%

6
4%

2
2%

1
7%

1
1%

1
6%

Where the homes are


being built [nsf]

4
3%

4
4%

2
3%

1
3%

1
7%

2
6%

2
2%

4
3%

3
3%

3
3%

2
3%

6
15%zc

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 41

Q.13b. And what, if any, are the main concerns you would have about Option ... (Q12)?
Base : All Respondents who selected an option at Q12

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

Off campus
(b)

Year of study
1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

Oppose
(m)

114

Support
(n)

15**

101

Oppose
(o)

61*

63*

40*

39*

15**

32*

Other

3
2%

1
1%

2
3%

1
2%

1
3%

1
3%

3
2%

3
2%

2
2%

1
7%

2
2%

1
6%

Don't know

1
1%

1
1%

1
2%

1
1%

1
1%

1
1%

No answer

20
13%

13
14%

7
11%

7
11%

5
13%

7
18%

1
7%

2
6%

18
15%

20
14%

14
12%

2
13%

13
13%

3
17%

*=Less than 0.5 %


Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

6**

Support
(l)

96*

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

148

Dissatisfied
(k)

157

3**

Satisfied
(j)

Younger people/
children/ future
generations

Total

122

Other uni
(i)

18**

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 42

Q.13b. And what, if any, are the main concerns you would have about Option ... (Q12)?
Base : All Respondents who selected an option at Q12

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

Option selection

The same
(F)

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

58*

48*

38*

70*

53*

65*

28**

17**

32*

87*

21**

28**

83*

23**

21**

Disruption/ time to
complete construction

1
1%

1
2%

1
1%

1
2%

1
1%

1
1%

Fill empty homes first/


develop Brownfield sites

2
1%

1
2%

1
3%

1
2%

1
2%

1
1%

1
5%

1
4%

1
1%

21
36%

21
44%

8
21%

30

21
40%

22
34%

11
39%

5
29%

11
34%

33
38%

8
38%

15
54%

28
34%

5
22%

9
43%

Total
Affordability/ house
prices

Greenfield development/
environmental impact

157

57
36%C

43%C

Infrastucture/ roads/
schools/ resources/
amenities/ services etc

5
3%

4
7%

1
2%

2
5%

3
4%

1
2%

4
6%

4
5%

1
5%

4
5%

1
4%

It needs to be
regulated/ controlled/
managed

1
1%

1
2%

1
1%

1
1%

3
5%

3
6%

2
5%

3
4%

5
9%

1
2%

4
14%

2
12%

8%F

4
5%

1
5%

4
14%

5
6%

2
9%

1
1%

1
3%

1
2%

1
6%

1
1%

No concerns/ none

28
18%

10
17%

10
21%

11
29%

10
14%

7
13%

14
22%

3
11%

3
18%

6
19%

15
17%

4
19%

3
11%

15
18%

5
22%

5
24%

Not sure the figures


quoted are right/
concept is flawed

2
1%

1
2%

1
2%

1
1%

1
2%

1
4%

1
1%

1
5%

2
2%

Overcrowding/ traffic
congestion/ growth in
population

11
7%

7
12%

1
2%

3
8%

4
6%

5
9%

4
6%

2
7%

1
6%

7
8%

3
14%

8
10%

1
4%

2
10%

Overdevelopment/ too
many houses/ not enough
space

11
7%

3
5%

4
8%

5
9%

3
5%

1
4%

1
3%

9
10%

1
5%

1
4%

7
8%

2
9%

1
5%

Population might not


rise/ might fall if
people leave area

2
1%

1
2%

1
3%

1
2%

1
2%

1
6%

1
3%

1
4%

1
5%

Students/ type of people


coming to the area

4
3%

2
3%

2
4%

3
4%

1
2%

2
3%

1
4%

3
3%

1
5%

3
4%

1
5%

Sustainability

1
1%

1
2%

1
1%

1
2%

1
1%

1
4%

Type/ quality/
desirability/ of homes
being built

6
4%

2
3%

2
4%

3
8%

3
4%

3
6%

3
5%

2
12%

4
5%

1
4%

2
2%

1
4%

1
5%

Where the homes are


being built [nsf]

4
3%

1
2%

1
3%

2
3%

3
5%

1
4%

3
3%

1
5%

4
5%

Younger people/
children/ future
generations

Jobs/ employment/
economic conditions
Might not be enough/ too
few homes being built

12

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

11%C

16%J

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 42

Q.13b. And what, if any, are the main concerns you would have about Option ... (Q12)?
Base : All Respondents who selected an option at Q12

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

65*

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

28**

17**

23**

21**

1
3%

2
2%

1
4%

2
2%

Don't know

1
1%

1
4%

1
1%

1
4%

6
16%

8
11%

9
14%

6
21%

2
12%

7
8%

2
10%

9
11%

6
26%

3
14%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

4
8%

28%zJ

28**

2
7%

83*

Housing
(O)

3
5%

2
4%

21**

Population
growth
(N)

17%B

87*

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

2
3%

10

32*

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

1
3%

13%BJ

53*

Less homes
(G)

2
4%

20

70*

Option selection

The same
(F)

1
2%

No answer

38*

Future development
More homes
(E)

3
2%

157

48*

Disagree
(D)

Other

Total

58*

Agree
(C)

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 43

Q.13c. Although you have not chosen any of the options A to D, what, if any, aspects of these options do you like?
Base : All Respondents who did not select an option at Q12

Student residence

4**

4**

1**

1**

6**

1**

6**

1**

8**

4**

3**

3**

3**

2
25%

2
50%

2
33%

1
100%

1
17%

2
25%

1
25%

1
33%

I like the idea of


[gradual] population
growth

I like the idea of more/


new houses homes for
people

I don't think the


infrastructure can
support the development

1
13%

1
25%

1
17%

1
17%

1
13%

1
33%

1
33%

I don't want to see any


further development

I don't want to see


greenfield development

I don't want to see an


increase in population

I don't agree with the


estimates/ figures
quoted

Other

1
13%

1
25%

1
100%

1
17%

1
13%

1
33%

1
33%

Don't know

No answer

4
50%

2
50%

2
50%

1
100%

3
50%

3
50%

1
100%

4
50%

3
75%

1
33%

2
67%

1
33%

None/ nothing/ don't


like anything

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

3rd/ final year


(e)

-**

Uni of Kent
(h)

Other uni
(i)

Satisfied
(j)

Dissatisfied
(k)

8**

I don't think there will


be enough jobs

2nd year
(d)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

On campus
(a)

I like the idea of jobs/


jobs for locals

1st year
(c)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

Total
(z)
Total

Off campus
(b)

Year of study

-**

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

Oppose
(o)

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 44

Q.13c. Although you have not chosen any of the options A to D, what, if any, aspects of these options do you like?
Base : All Respondents who did not select an option at Q12

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

8**

4**

2**

2**

4**

1**

6**

-**

-**

-**

-**

4**

2**

-**

-**

2
25%

2
100%

1
50%

1
25%

1
100%

1
17%

1
50%

I like the idea of


[gradual] population
growth

I like the idea of more/


new houses homes for
people

I don't think the


infrastructure can
support the development

1
13%

1
25%

1
25%

1
17%

1
50%

I don't want to see any


further development

I don't want to see


greenfield development

I don't want to see an


increase in population

I don't agree with the


estimates/ figures
quoted

Other

1
13%

1
25%

1
17%

1
25%

Don't know

No answer

4
50%

3
75%

1
50%

1
25%

3
50%

3
75%

Total
I like the idea of jobs/
jobs for locals

I don't think there will


be enough jobs

None/ nothing/ don't


like anything

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

-**

The same
(F)

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 45

Q.14.1. The options we presented to you were based on four main factors. Which of the factors on this card were most important ... in helping to choose Option x?
Most important
Base : All Respondents

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

6**

Support
(l)
118

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

18**

104

Oppose
(o)

41*

45*

15**

19%ln

13
20%

7
17%

8
18%

4
27%

3
9%

27
21%

2
50%

30
19%

16
14%

9
50%

15
14%

11
52%

The amount of job growth

85
52%

50
50%

35
54%

33
52%

22
54%

24
53%

6
40%

17
52%

67
52%

1
25%

80
51%

5
83%

64
54%

7
39%

56
54%

8
38%

The amount of population


growth

23
14%

14
14%

9
14%

8
13%

7
17%

6
13%

2
13%

5
15%

17
13%

1
25%

22
14%

19
16%

1
6%

15
14%

2
10%

The amount of housing

21
13%

12
12%

9
14%

8
13%

4
10%

6
13%

3
20%

7
21%

14
11%

20
13%

1
17%

17
14%

16
15%

None of these

2
1%

2
3%

1
2%

1
2%

1
3%

1
1%

2
1%

1
1%

1
1%

Don't know

2
1%

2
3%

1
2%

1
2%

2
2%

2
1%

1
1%

1
6%

1
1%

*=Less than 0.5 %


Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

156

Dissatisfied
(k)

64*

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

4**

Satisfied
(j)

8
12%

32

128

Other uni
(i)

65*

165

33*

Uni of Kent
(h)

24
24%

Total
The amount of building
on greenfield

100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study

21**

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 46

Q.14.1. The options we presented to you were based on four main factors. Which of the factors on this card were most important ... in helping to choose Option x?
Most important
Base : All Respondents

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

165

62*

50*

40*

74*

53*

66*

34*

17**

32*

The amount of building


on greenfield

32

11
18%

9
18%

7
18%

13
18%

9
17%

9
14%

12

13

35%zF

10
59%

The amount of job growth

85

31
50%

26
52%

22
55%

38
51%

28

40
61%G

10
29%

2
12%

5
16%

61

53%G

70%zI

15
71%

9
15%

7
14%

7
18%

10
14%

8
15%

6
9%

8
24%

2
12%

6
19%

11
13%

4
19%

9
15%

6
12%

2
5%

12
16%

7
13%

9
14%

4
12%

2
12%

7
22%

10
11%

2
10%

21
100%

Total

19%JM
52%GIL

The amount of population


growth

23

The amount of housing

21

14%LM
13%LM

41%zJ

87*

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

5
6%

21**

32*

85*

23**

21**

32

23
100%

100%zM

85
100%zL

None of these

2
1%

1
2%

1
2%

1
3%

1
1%

1
2%

1
2%

1
6%

Don't know

2
1%

1
2%

1
2%

1
3%

1
2%

1
3%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 47

Q.14.2. The options we presented to you were based on four main factors. Which of the factors on this card were most important ... in helping to choose Option x?
Second most important
Base : All who didn't answer None of these/ Don't know previously

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
student/ postgrad
(f)

Uni of
Canterbury
Christchurch
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

Oppose
(m)
17**

102

Oppose
(o)

62*

40*

44*

15**

32*

15
24%

11
28%

14
32%

5
33%

7
22%

37
30%

1
25%

43
28%

1
17%

28
24%

5
29%

24
24%

6
29%

The amount of job growth

28
17%

21
21%

7
11%

16
26%z

4
10%

6
14%

2
13%

3
9%

23
18%

2
50%

27
18%

22
19%

2
12%

22
22%

3
14%

The amount of population


growth

46

26
26%

20
33%

18
29%

12
30%

11
25%

5
33%

16

29%hn

50%zh

29
23%

1
25%

42
28%

3
50%

32
28%

7
41%

22
22%

8
38%

The amount of housing

41
25%

23
23%

18
30%

13
21%

13
33%

13
30%

2
13%

5
16%

36
29%

39
26%

2
33%

34
29%

3
18%

34

4
19%

1
1%

1
2%

1
7%

1
3%h

1
1%

*=Less than 0.5 %


Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

116

Support
(n)

15
25%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

6**

Support
(l)

61*

Don't know

152

Dissatisfied
(k)

30
30%

None of these

4**

Satisfied
(j)

45
28%

161

125

Other uni
(i)

The amount of building


on greenfield

Total

100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study

33%z

21**

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 48

Q.14.2. The options we presented to you were based on four main factors. Which of the factors on this card were most important ... in helping to choose Option x?
Second most important
Base : All who didn't answer None of these/ Don't know previously

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

161

60*

48*

38*

73*

52*

64*

34*

16**

31*

87*

21**

32*

85*

23**

21**

The amount of building


on greenfield

45

21
35%

10
21%

13
34%

19
26%

9
17%

22

9
26%

2
13%

11
35%

27
31%

3
14%

28

8
35%

9
43%

The amount of job growth

28

Total

28%EL

34%E

33%L

8
13%

9
19%

6
16%

15
21%

8
15%

9
14%

9
26%

4
25%

6
19%

13
15%

3
14%

12

17%M

9
39%

7
33%

The amount of population


growth

46
29%

15
25%

14
29%

10
26%

22
30%

15
29%

17
27%

11
32%

9
56%

7
23%

23
26%

5
24%

13
41%

28
33%

5
24%

The amount of housing

41

16
27%

14
29%

9
24%

16
22%

20

16
25%

4
12%

1
6%

6
19%

24
28%

10
48%

6
19%

29

25%G

6
26%

None of these

1
1%

1
2%

1
1%

1
3%

1
3%

1
3%

Don't know

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

38%zG

38%zM

34%z

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 49

Q.14.3. The options we presented to you were based on four main factors. Which of the factors on this card were most important ... in helping to choose Option x?
Third most important
Base : All who didn't answer None of these/ Don't know previously

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

3rd/ final year


(e)

62*

40*

16

19%egj

9
15%

26%e

8
20%

4
9%

2
14%

1
3%

The amount of job growth

25
16%

15
15%

10
17%

7
11%

10
25%

5
11%

3
21%

The amount of population


growth

50
31%

33
33%

17
28%

19
31%

11
28%

15
34%

The amount of housing

50

30
30%

20
33%

19
31%

10
25%

1
1%

3%al

7%a

1
2%

30

31%ln

None of these
Don't know

31*

Other uni
(i)

Satisfied
(j)
151

Dissatisfied
(k)

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

Oppose
(o)

4**

6**

116

17**

102

21**

28

26
17%

4
67%

28
24%z

25

22%zg

1
25%

25%z

7
23%

17
14%

1
25%

23
15%

19
16%

3
18%

14
14%

4
19%

5
36%

9
29%

39
31%

2
50%

48
32%

1
17%

37
32%

4
24%

38
37%z

5
24%

17
39%

4
29%

12
39%

38
30%

49
32%

1
17%

31
27%

10
59%

23
23%

12
57%

1
3%

3
7%

2
6%

3
2%

5
3%

1
1%

2
2%

*=Less than 0.5 %


Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

14**

Uni of Kent
(h)
125

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

44*

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

60*

160

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

21
21%

Total
The amount of building
on greenfield

100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 50

Q.14.3. The options we presented to you were based on four main factors. Which of the factors on this card were most important ... in helping to choose Option x?
Third most important
Base : All who didn't answer None of these/ Don't know previously

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

160

60*

47*

The amount of building


on greenfield

30

10
17%

13
28%

3
8%

The amount of job growth

25

Total

19%CGL

38*

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)
33*

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

72*

52*

64*

16**

30*

87*

21**

31*

85*

23**

21**

17

15

4
13%

25%z

4
19%

19

29%zG

2
6%

22

24%C

10
16%

5
22%

6
29%

10
43%

6
29%
6
29%

16%JM

9
15%

6
13%

8
21%

8
11%

10
19%

7
11%

7
21%

5
31%

30%zJ

8
9%

3
14%

29%zM

The amount of population


growth

50
31%

18
30%

17
36%

12
32%

22
31%

16
31%

22
34%

8
24%

4
25%

9
30%

26
30%

7
33%

11
35%

33
39%z

The amount of housing

50
31%

20
33%

10
21%

13
34%

24
33%

11
21%

20
31%

16

7
44%

6
20%

28
32%

7
33%

11
35%

31
36%

8
35%

5
3%

3
5%

1
2%

2
5%

1
1%

5
8%zE

2
7%

3
3%

2
2%

3
14%

None of these
Don't know

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

48%zE

22%L

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 51

Q.14.4. The options we presented to you were based on four main factors. Which of the factors on this card were most important ... in helping to choose Option x?
Fourth most important
Base : All who didn't answer None of these/ Don't know previously

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

Off campus
(b)

Year of study
1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

99*

56*

61*

39*

41*

14**

29**

6**

115

17**

25
25%

24

18
30%

13
33%

15
37%

3
21%

18
62%

31
25%

48
33%

1
17%

43
37%z

3
18%

37
37%

4
19%

The amount of job growth

20
13%ln

13
13%

7
13%

5
8%

4
10%

8
20%

3
21%

3
10%

17
14%

19
13%

1
17%

11
10%

5
29%

9
9%

6
29%

The amount of population


growth

35
23%

25
25%

10
18%

15
25%

8
21%

10
24%

2
14%

35
29%z

34
23%

1
17%

25
22%

5
29%

24
24%

6
29%

The amount of housing

45

34
34%

11
20%

21
34%

12
31%

7
17%

5
36%

6
21%

36
30%

3
75%

41
28%

2
33%

32
28%

4
24%

27
27%

5
24%

4%j

2
2%

4
7%

2
3%

2
5%

1
2%

1
7%

2
7%

3
2%

1
25%

4
3%

1
17%

4
3%

3
3%

29%be

None of these
Don't know

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

100

Oppose
(o)

49

43%za

146

Dissatisfied
(k)

155
32%ah

4**

Satisfied
(j)

The amount of building


on greenfield

Total

122

Other uni
(i)

21**

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 52

Q.14.4. The options we presented to you were based on four main factors. Which of the factors on this card were most important ... in helping to choose Option x?
Fourth most important
Base : All who didn't answer None of these/ Don't know previously

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

155

57*

46*

36*

71*

52*

59*

33*

16**

28**

The amount of building


on greenfield

49

16
28%

15
33%

14
39%

23
32%

19
37%

18
31%

11
33%

4
25%

2
7%

The amount of job growth

20

Total

32%L

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

84*

21**

31*

83*

23**

18**

29
35%

14
67%

35

10
43%

4
22%

13%CJM

10
18%

6
13%

1
3%

11
15%

6
12%

6
10%

7
21%

5
31%

8
29%

5
6%

4
17%

6
33%

The amount of population


growth

35
23%

15
26%

8
17%

7
19%

16
23%

11
21%

16
27%

5
15%

1
6%

7
25%

22
26%

5
24%

7
23%

21
25%

7
39%

The amount of housing

45
29%

15
26%

16
35%

14
39%

18
25%

13
25%

18
31%

8
24%

6
38%

11
39%

23
27%

2
10%

13
42%

24
29%

8
35%

None of these

6
4%

1
2%

1
2%

3
4%

3
6%

1
2%

2
6%

5
6%

1
3%

3
4%

1
4%

1
6%

Don't know

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

10

42%zL

32%zM

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 53

Q.14. Summary Table. The options we presented to you were based on four main factors. Which of the factors on this card were most important in helping to choose Option ...?
Base : All who didn't answer None of these/ Don't know
The amount of
The amount of
building on The amount of population The amount of
greenfield
job growth
growth
housing
Total
Most important

156
(4)

Second most important


(3)
Third most important

(2)

Fourth most important


(1)
MEAN

158

154

85
54%

23
15%

21
13%

45
29%

28
18%

46
30%

41
26%

30
19%

25
16%

50
32%

50
32%

49
31%

20
13%

35
23%

45
29%

2.38

3.13

2.37

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %

157

32
21%

2.24

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 54

Q.15. Still thinking about Option .../ these options, which, if any, of these types of home do you think should be built in the district of Canterbury?
Base : All Respondents

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

Oppose
(m)

118

Support
(n)

18**

104

Oppose
(o)

64*

41*

45*

15**

33*

24
38%

11
27%

16
36%

5
33%

13
39%

41
32%

2
50%

51
33%

3
50%

37
31%

5
28%

33
32%

7
33%

Family homes

115
70%

66
66%

49
75%

43
67%

30
73%

31
69%

11
73%

27
82%

85
66%

3
75%

108
69%

4
67%

80
68%

13
72%

71
68%

15
71%

Purpose-built student
accommodation

104
63%

58
58%

46
71%

36
56%

31

26
58%

11
73%

21
64%

81
63%

2
50%

96
62%

6
100%

86
73%z

5
28%

78

76%c

75%z

4
19%

37

18
18%

19
29%

13
20%

11
27%

10
22%

3
20%

13

23
18%

1
25%

33
21%

1
17%

28
24%

2
11%

26
25%

2
10%

39%zh

6**

Support
(l)

22
34%

22%h

156

Dissatisfied
(k)

65*

Retirement homes

4**

Satisfied
(j)

34
34%

165

128

Other uni
(i)

56
34%

Total
Homes for single people

100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study

21**

Other (specify)

4
2%

2
2%

2
3%

2
5%

1
2%

1
7%

2
2%

2
50%

4
3%

2
2%

1
6%

1
1%

2
10%

Don't know

4
2%

2
2%

2
3%

3
5%

1
2%

1
3%

3
2%

4
3%

3
3%

3
3%

No answer

1
1%

1
1%

1
2%

1
1%

1
1%

1
6%

1
5%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 55

Q.15. Still thinking about Option .../ these options, which, if any, of these types of home do you think should be built in the district of Canterbury?
Base : All Respondents

Enough homes
Total
(z)
Total
Homes for single people
Family homes
Purpose-built student
accommodation
Retirement homes
Other (specify)
Don't know
No answer

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

62*

50*

40*

74*

53*

66*

34*

17**

32*

87*

21**

32*

85*

23**

21**

56
34%

16
26%

20
40%

18
45%

26
35%

17
32%

24
36%

13
38%

9
53%

11
34%

30
34%

4
19%

13
41%

28
33%

7
30%

6
29%

115
70%

41
66%

32
64%

23
58%

53
72%

36
68%

50
76%

22
65%

9
53%

21
66%

64
74%

17
81%

22
69%

66

15
65%

11
52%

104

35
56%

32
64%

23
58%

45
61%

41

16
47%

8
47%

13
41%

78%zI

14
67%

16
50%

60

77%zG

41
62%

68

63%GI

71%zL

13
57%

14
67%

37
22%

14
23%

9
18%

8
20%

19
26%

15
28%

10
15%

9
26%

4
24%

4
13%

21
24%

8
38%

5
16%

20
24%

6
26%

6
29%

4
2%

1
2%

3
6%

1
3%

2
3%

2
4%

2
3%

2
12%

6%J

6%M

2
9%

4
2%

2
3%

1
2%

1
2%

1
3%

1
6%

1
5%

1
3%

1
1%

1
5%

1
1%

1
2%

1
3%

1
3%

165

10%zD

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

78%z

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 56

Q.16. Where do you think homes should be built within the district of Canterbury?
Base : All Respondents

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

Oppose
(m)

41*

45*

15**

33*

40
63%

25
61%

25
56%

4
27%

19
58%

72
56%

3
75%

88
56%

5
83%

72
61%

9
50%

60
58%

9
43%

Whitstable

45

21
21%

24
37%za

16
25%

15
37%

11
24%

3
20%

13
39%

31
24%

1
25%

42
27%

3
50%

28
24%

7
39%

27
26%

6
29%

20
20%

21
32%

14
22%

9
22%

12
27%

6
40%

13

25%hl

39%zh

26
20%

2
50%

41
26%

24
20%

6
33%

22
21%

7
33%

Larger villages Barham, Blean, Bridge,


Chartham, Hersden,
Littlebourne and Sturry

75
45%

46
46%

29
45%

30
47%

20
49%

19
42%

6
40%

18
55%

56
44%

1
25%

72
46%

2
33%

55
47%

9
50%

48
46%

11
52%

Smaller villages

21

9
9%

12
18%

7
11%

5
12%

7
16%

2
13%

8
24%zh

12
9%

1
25%

19
12%

1
17%

15
13%

2
11%

14
13%

2
10%

2%l

3
3%

1
2%

1
2%

2
4%

1
7%

1
3%

3
2%

4
3%

1
1%

1
6%

1
1%

1
5%

It depends

1
1%

1
1%

1
2%

1
1%

1
1%

1
1%

1
1%

Don't know

8
5%

4
4%

4
6%

2
3%

1
2%

3
7%

2
6%

6
5%

8
5%

5
4%

5
5%

1
5%

No answer

Other (specify)

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

2
13%
-

18**

104

Oppose
(o)

64*

13%h

118

Support
(n)

43
66%

41

6**

Support
(l)

65*

Herne Bay

156

Dissatisfied
(k)

51
51%

27%a

4**

Satisfied
(j)

94
57%

165

128

Other uni
(i)

The city of Canterbury

Total

100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study

21**

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 57

Q.16. Where do you think homes should be built within the district of Canterbury?
Base : All Respondents

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

165

62*

50*

40*

74*

53*

66*

34*

17**

32*

87*

21**

32*

85*

23**

21**

The city of Canterbury

94

32
64%

22
55%

40
54%

34
64%

37
56%

15
44%

13
76%

13
41%

54

57%I

30
48%

62%I

11
52%

15
47%

50
59%

15
65%

12
57%

Whitstable

45
27%

17
27%

16
32%

10
25%

19
26%

12
23%

20
30%

11
32%

3
18%

5
16%

27
31%

7
33%

6
19%

25
29%

7
30%

5
24%

Herne Bay

41
25%

15
24%

16
32%

7
18%

22
30%

13
25%

15
23%

11
32%

1
6%

10
31%

22
25%

4
19%

10
31%

19
22%

5
22%

5
24%

Larger villages Barham, Blean, Bridge,


Chartham, Hersden,
Littlebourne and Sturry

75
45%

33
53%

21
42%

17
43%

37
50%

21
40%

35
53%

17
50%

4
24%

20
63%z

39
45%

10
48%

14
44%

42
49%

8
35%

10
48%

Smaller villages

21
13%

8
13%

8
16%

3
8%

9
12%

6
11%

8
12%

3
9%

1
6%

4
13%

14
16%

2
10%

2
6%

12
14%

3
13%

4
19%

Other (specify)

4
2%

2
3%

1
2%

2
3%

1
2%

1
2%

1
3%

1
6%

1
3%

1
1%

1
5%

3
4%

1
5%

It depends

1
1%

1
3%

1
2%

1
1%

1
1%

Don't know

8
5%

2
3%

4
8%

2
5%

5
7%

2
4%

3
5%

1
3%

3
9%

4
5%

1
3%

4
5%

1
4%

1
5%

No answer

Total

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 58

Q.17a. Thinking about what you know or have heard about employment in the district of Canterbury, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
There are plenty of employment opportunities in this area for the current population
Base : All

Student residence
Total
(z)
Total
Strongly agree

165
5
3%a

On campus
(a)
100

Off campus
(b)
65*

Year of study
1st year
(c)
64*

2nd year
(d)

3rd/ final year


(e)

41*

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

45*

1
1%

4
6%

1
2%

1
2%

3
7%

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)
128

Other uni
(i)
4**

Satisfied
(j)
156

Dissatisfied
(k)
6**

Support
(l)
118

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

18**

104

Oppose
(o)

15**

33*

5
4%

5
3%

4
3%

4
4%

21**
-

Tend to agree

35
21%

25
25%

10
15%

18
28%

8
20%

8
18%

1
7%

8
24%

27
21%

33
21%

1
17%

23
19%

6
33%

23
22%

6
29%

Neither agree nor


disagree

43

31
31%

12
18%

23

26%e

36%ze

9
22%

6
13%

5
33%

9
27%

33
26%

1
25%

41
26%

1
17%

33
28%

4
22%

28
27%

4
19%

Tend to disagree

54
33%

34
34%

20
31%

17
27%

17
41%

14
31%

6
40%

8
24%

44
34%

2
50%

50
32%

3
50%

41
35%

2
11%

38
37%

5
24%

Strongly disagree

20

10

2
13%

6
18%

13
10%

1
25%

19
12%

1
17%

14
12%

4
22%

9
9%

4
19%

12%ac

Don't know

8
5%ln

4
4%

16
25%za

2
3%

5
5%

3
5%

3
5%

4
9%

1
7%

2
6%

6
5%

8
5%

3
3%

2
11%

2
2%

2
10%

1
7%

8
24%

32
25%

38
24%

1
17%

27
23%

6
33%

27
26%

6
29%

8
53%

14
42%

57
45%

3
75%

69
44%

4
67%

55
47%

6
33%

47
45%

9
43%

-7
-47%

-6
-18%

-25
-20%

-3
-75%

-31
-20%

-3
-50%

-28
-24%

0
0%

-20
-19%

-3
-14%

15%c

22%zc

AGREE

40
24%

26
26%

14
22%

19
30%

9
22%

11
24%

DISAGREE

74

38
38%

36

19
30%

23

24

56%c

53%c

-12
-12%

-22
-34%

0
0%

-14
-34%

45%ac

NET AGREE

-34
-21%

55%za

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

-13
-29%

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 59

Q.17a. Thinking about what you know or have heard about employment in the district of Canterbury, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
There are plenty of employment opportunities in this area for the current population
Base : All

Enough homes
Total
(z)
Total
Strongly agree
Tend to agree

165
5
3%
35
21%D

Neither agree nor


disagree

43

Tend to disagree

54

26%BCD
33%AC

Strongly disagree

20
12%C

Don't know
AGREE
DISAGREE

8
5%

62*

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)
50*

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

34*

17**

32*

21**

32*

2
3%

2
2%

3
14%

3
4%

2
9%

11
21%

17
26%

5
15%

6
35%

5
16%

19
22%

3
14%

7
22%

19
22%

5
22%

2
10%

13
25%

16
24%

9
26%

2
12%

10
31%

24
28%

6
29%

8
25%

22
26%

6
26%

6
29%

54

50%zA

21
40%

18
27%

13
38%

6
35%

12
38%

28
32%

7
33%

11
34%

25
29%

10
43%

8
38%

6
10%

8
16%

20

6
11%

7
11%

6
18%

2
12%

2
6%

11
13%

2
10%

2
6%

13
15%

4
19%

3
5%

1
2%

1
3%

1
6%

3
9%

3
3%

13%z

3
4%

1
5%

40

13
25%

19
29%

5
15%

6
35%

5
16%

21
24%

6
29%

7
22%

22
26%

7
30%

2
10%

74

27
51%

25
38%

19
56%

8
47%

14
44%

39
45%

9
43%

13
41%

38
45%

10
43%

12
57%

-14
-26%

-6
-9%

-14
-41%

-2
-12%

-9
-28%

-18
-21%

-3
-14%

-6
-19%

-16
-19%

-3
-13%

-10
-48%

18
29%

8
16%

13
21%

25

22
35%zB

8
16%

74

19
31%

33

3
5%

-25
-50%

66%zA

88%zD

100%zD

40
100%z

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

73%zC
27%zC

100%zC

-74
-100%

9%E

23**

Housing
(O)

2
4%

35

85*

Population
growth
(N)

7
14%

87*

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

74*

18
29%

66*

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

5
13%zD

53*

The same
(F)

40*

1
2%

24%D

-34
-21%

Agree
(C)

4
6%

40

45%AC

NET AGREE

Agree
(A)

21**

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 60

Q.17b. Thinking about what you know or have heard about employment in the district of Canterbury, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
I would be willing to move out of the district to take a better job
Base : All

Student residence
Total
(z)
Total
Strongly agree
Tend to agree

On campus
(a)

1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

41*

45*

15**

33*

39%j

19
30%

20
49%

20
44%

5
33%

13
39%

49
38%

2
50%

67

47

50%d

11
27%

18
40%

6
40%

10
30%

57
45%

67

47%zb

20
31%

32

41%bd

15%za

4
6%

4
10%

4
9%

2
13%

4
12%

10
8%

2
13%

1
3%
5
15%zh

Tend to disagree

8
5%

4
4%

4
6%

4
6%

2
5%

Strongly disagree

9
5%hln

4
4%

5
8%

3
5%

3
7%

3
7%

3
2%

1
1%

2
3%

2
3%

1
2%

87%zb

44
68%

51
80%

31
76%

38
84%

11
73%

23
70%

8
8%

9
14%

7
11%

5
12%

3
7%

2
13%

6
18%

35
54%

44
69%

26
63%

35
78%

9
60%

17
52%

AGREE

131
79%b

DISAGREE

17
10%h

NET AGREE

114
69%bg

87

79
79%zb

10

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

4**

Satisfied
(j)

64*

14

128

Other uni
(i)

24
37%

4
4%

Don't know

Uni of Kent
(h)

65*

64

8%a

Neither agree nor


disagree

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

40
40%

165

100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study

156

6**

Support
(l)
118

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

18**

104

Oppose
(o)
21**

4
67%

51
43%

8
44%

44
42%

8
38%

43%z

45
38%

6
33%

41
39%

8
38%

13
8%

1
17%

9
8%

2
11%

8
8%

2
10%

5
4%

2
50%

8
5%

7
6%

7
7%

1
5%

4
3%

8
5%

1
17%

3
3%

2
11%

3
3%

2
10%

3
2%

3
2%

3
3%

1
1%

106

57
37%

Dissatisfied
(k)

83%z

2
50%

124
79%

4
67%

96
81%

14
78%

85
82%

16
76%

9
7%

2
50%

16
10%

1
17%

10
8%

2
11%

10
10%

3
14%

0
0%

108
69%

3
50%

86
73%

12
67%

75
72%

13
62%

97
76%zg

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 61

Q.17b. Thinking about what you know or have heard about employment in the district of Canterbury, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
I would be willing to move out of the district to take a better job
Base : All

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

62*

50*

40*

74*

53*

66*

34*

17**

32*

87*

21**

32*

85*

23**

21**

Strongly agree

64
39%

23
37%

23
46%

18
45%

30
41%

22
42%

23
35%

12
35%

8
47%

9
28%

35
40%

7
33%

11
34%

34
40%

11
48%

6
29%

Tend to agree

67

26
42%

13
26%

11
28%

28
38%

19
36%

31
47%

16
47%

5
29%

17
53%

36
41%

7
33%

14
44%

34
40%

8
35%

10
48%

Total

165

41%B

Neither agree nor


disagree

14
8%

5
8%

6
12%

5
13%

8
11%

6
11%

5
8%

1
3%

1
6%

2
6%

7
8%

4
19%

2
6%

8
9%

2
9%

2
10%

Tend to disagree

8
5%

4
6%

3
6%

1
3%

5
7%

3
6%

2
3%

2
6%

1
6%

2
6%

4
5%

1
5%

2
6%

2
2%

1
4%

3
14%

Strongly disagree

9
5%

3
5%

3
6%

2
3%

3
6%

3
5%

3
9%

2
12%

1
3%

3
3%

2
10%

2
6%

5
6%

1
4%

3
2%

1
2%

2
4%

1
1%

2
3%

1
3%

2
2%

1
3%

2
2%

131
79%

49
79%

36
72%

29
73%

58
78%

41
77%

54
82%

28
82%

13
76%

26
81%

71
82%

14
67%

25
78%

68
80%

19
83%

16
76%

17
10%

7
11%

6
12%

6
15%

7
9%

6
11%

5
8%

5
15%

3
18%

3
9%

7
8%

3
14%

4
13%

7
8%

2
9%

3
14%

114
69%

42
68%

30
60%

23
58%

51
69%

35
66%

49
74%

23
68%

10
59%

23
72%

64
74%

11
52%

21
66%

61
72%

17
74%

13
62%

Don't know
AGREE
DISAGREE
NET AGREE

13%zD

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 62

Q.17c. Thinking about what you know or have heard about employment in the district of Canterbury, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
We should do more to help businesses to set up here
Base : All

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

Support
(n)

41*

45*

15**

33*

22
34%

15
37%

12
27%

3
20%

10
30%

41
32%

1
25%

50
32%

1
17%

41
35%

5
28%

38
37%

4
19%

Tend to agree

75
45%

51
51%

24
37%

28
44%

18
44%

21
47%

8
53%

13
39%

62
48%

69
44%

4
67%

52
44%

10
56%

44
42%

12
57%

Neither agree nor


disagree

30
18%

15
15%

15
23%

11
17%

7
17%

10
22%

2
13%

8
24%

21
16%

1
25%

29
19%

1
17%

20
17%

3
17%

17
16%

5
24%

Tend to disagree

3
2%

1
1%

2
3%

1
2%

1
2%

1
2%

2
2%

1
25%

3
2%

2
2%

3
3%

Strongly disagree

2
1%

2
3%

1
2%

1
7%

1
3%

1
25%

2
1%

1
1%

1
1%

Don't know

3
2%

1
1%

2
3%

2
3%

1
7%

1
3%

2
2%

3
2%

2
2%

1
1%

44
68%

50
78%

33
80%

33
73%

11
73%

23
70%

5
83%

93
79%

15
83%

82
79%

16
76%

4
6%

1
2%

1
2%

2
4%

1
7%

1
3%

3
3%

4
4%

40
62%

49
77%

32
78%

31
69%

10
67%

22
67%

5
83%

90
76%

15
83%

78
75%

16
76%

DISAGREE

5
3%ah

NET AGREE

122
74%b

83%zb

1
1%
82
82%zb

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

103
80%z

1
25%

119
76%

2
2%

2
50%

5
3%

-1
-25%

114
73%

101
79%z

18**

104

Oppose
(o)

64*

83

118

Oppose
(m)

20
31%

77%b

6**

Support
(l)

65*

127

156

Dissatisfied
(k)

32
32%

AGREE

4**

Satisfied
(j)

52
32%

165

128

Other uni
(i)

Strongly agree

Total

100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study

21**

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 63

Q.17c. Thinking about what you know or have heard about employment in the district of Canterbury, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
We should do more to help businesses to set up here
Base : All

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

165

62*

50*

40*

74*

53*

66*

34*

17**

32*

87*

21**

32*

85*

23**

21**

52

22

26
35%

45%zFG

17
26%

6
18%

4
24%

7
22%

29
33%

11
52%

4
13%

35

44%zA

13
33%

24

32%GL

16
26%

41%zL

7
30%

5
24%

Tend to agree

75
45%

28
45%

22
44%

16
40%

33
45%

19
36%

33
50%

19
56%

10
59%

14
44%

43
49%

5
24%

17
53%

38
45%

10
43%

9
43%

Neither agree nor


disagree

30

16

18%BM

26%B

4
8%

Total
Strongly agree

9
23%

12
16%

9
17%

15
23%

5
15%

2
12%

9
28%

13
15%

5
24%

7
22%

10
12%

5
22%

7
33%

3
2%

2
3%

1
1%

9%zEF

1
6%

6%M

1
4%

Strongly disagree

2
1%

2
4%

1
3%

1
1%

1
2%

1
3%

1
3%

1
3%

1
1%

Don't know

3
2%

2
3%

1
3%

1
2%

1
3%

1
1%

1
3%

1
1%

127
77%

44
71%

44

29
73%

59
80%

43
81%

50
76%

25
74%

14
82%

21
66%

83%I

16
76%

21
66%

17
74%

14
67%

1
3%

3
4%

1
2%

1
6%

1
3%

1
1%

1
4%

28
70%

56
76%

42
79%

50
76%

13
76%

20
63%

16
76%

18
56%

16
70%

14
67%

Tend to disagree

AGREE
DISAGREE
NET AGREE

5
3%
122
74%L

44
71%

88%zA

2
4%
42
84%z

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

12%zF

21
62%

72

71
82%zI

9%zM

73
86%zL

1
1%
72
85%zL

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 64

Q.17d. Thinking about what you know or have heard about employment in the district of Canterbury, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
We should do more to encourage university graduates to stay in the district when they finish studying
Base : All

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

Oppose
(o)

64*

41*

45*

15**

33*

6**

118

18**

104

21**

23
35%

16
25%

13
32%

14
31%

5
33%

8
24%

37
29%

3
75%

45
29%

2
33%

40

38

34%z

3
17%

37%z

4
19%

Tend to agree

66
40%

41
41%

25
38%

30
47%

14
34%

18
40%

4
27%

17
52%

48
38%

1
25%

64
41%

1
17%

45
38%

6
33%

40
38%

8
38%

Neither agree nor


disagree

29
18%

20
20%

9
14%

10
16%

8
20%

7
16%

4
27%

4
12%

25
20%

28
18%

18
15%

7
39%

14
13%

6
29%

Tend to disagree

16
10%

10
10%

6
9%

6
9%

5
12%

4
9%

1
7%

3
9%

13
10%

14
9%

2
33%

11
9%

1
6%

9
9%

2
10%

Strongly disagree

6
4%

4
4%

2
3%

2
3%

1
2%

2
4%

1
7%

1
3%

5
4%

5
3%

1
17%

4
3%

1
6%

3
3%

1
5%

Don't know

114
69%

66
66%

48
74%

46
72%

27
66%

32
71%

9
60%

25
76%

85
66%

4
100%

109
70%

3
50%

85
72%

9
50%

78
75%z

12
57%

DISAGREE

22
13%

14
14%

8
12%

8
13%

6
15%

6
13%

2
13%

4
12%

18
14%

19
12%

3
50%

15
13%

2
11%

12
12%

3
14%

NET AGREE

92
56%

52
52%

40
62%

38
59%

21
51%

26
58%

7
47%

21
64%

67
52%

4
100%

0
0%

70
59%

7
39%

66

9
43%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

156

Dissatisfied
(k)

65*

AGREE

4**

Satisfied
(j)

25
25%

165

128

Other uni
(i)

48
29%

Total
Strongly agree

100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study

90
58%z

63%z

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 65

Q.17d. Thinking about what you know or have heard about employment in the district of Canterbury, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
We should do more to encourage university graduates to stay in the district when they finish studying
Base : All

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

62*

50*

40*

74*

53*

66*

34*

17**

32*

87*

21**

32*

85*

23**

21**

48
29%

14
23%

21
42%zA

14
35%

25
34%

20
38%

18
27%

7
21%

3
18%

8
25%

28
32%

6
29%

9
28%

28
33%

4
17%

6
29%

Tend to agree

66
40%

29
47%

17
34%

14
35%

31
42%

21
40%

30
45%

10
29%

8
47%

10
31%

36
41%

10
48%

10
31%

38
45%

9
39%

7
33%

Neither agree nor


disagree

29

10
16%

7
14%

7
18%

10
14%

10
19%

9
14%

8
24%

5
29%

8
25%

11
13%

4
19%

18%M

25%M

Tend to disagree

16
10%

7
11%

4
8%

3
8%

7
9%

2
4%

6
9%

7
21%zE

1
6%

5
16%

9
10%

Strongly disagree

6
4%

2
3%

1
2%

2
5%

1
1%

3
5%

2
6%

1
3%

3
3%

Don't know

43
69%

38
76%

28
70%

56
76%

41

48

77%G

73%G

17
50%

11
65%

9
15%

5
10%

5
13%

8
11%

9
14%

9
26%zE

34
55%

33
66%

23
58%

48

39

39

65%z

74%zG

59%G

Total
Strongly agree

AGREE

165

114
69%G

DISAGREE

22
13%E

NET AGREE

92
56%GI

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

2
4%

8
24%

8
9%

6
26%

6
29%

4
13%

9
11%

2
9%

1
5%

1
5%

1
3%

2
2%

2
9%

1
5%

18
56%

64
74%

16
76%

19
59%

66
78%z

13
57%

13
62%

1
6%

6
19%

12
14%

1
5%

5
16%

11
13%

4
17%

2
10%

10
59%

12
38%

52

15
71%

14
44%

55

9
39%

11
52%

60%I

65%zL

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 66

Q.17e. Thinking about what you know or have heard about employment in the district of Canterbury, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
There are plenty of employment opportunities in this area for graduates
Base : All students

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

Off campus
(b)

Year of study
1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
local area

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
student/ postgrad
(f)

Uni of
Canterbury
Christchurch
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

Oppose
(m)

65*

64*

41*

45*

15**

33*

Tend to agree

27
16%

15
15%

12
18%

11
17%

6
15%

9
20%

1
7%

7
21%

20
16%

27
17%

21
18%

3
17%

19
18%

3
14%

Neither agree nor


disagree

35

28
28%zb

7
11%

22

21%b

34%zde

6
15%

6
13%

1
7%

8
24%

27
21%

34
22%

1
17%

23
19%

6
33%

20
19%

7
33%

Tend to disagree

68

45
45%

23
35%

19
30%

20
49%

20
44%

9
60%

11
33%

55
43%

2
50%

63
40%

2
33%

46
39%

7
39%

42
40%

8
38%

20

7
11%

6
15%

8
18%

4
27%

6
18%

17
13%

2
50%

22
14%

3
50%

21
18%

1
6%

18
17%

1
5%

1
3%

9
7%

10
6%

7
6%

1
6%

5
5%

2
10%

1
7%

7
21%

20
16%

27
17%

21
18%

3
17%

19
18%

3
14%

13
87%

17
52%

72
56%

4
100%

85
54%

5
83%

67
57%

8
44%

60
58%

9
43%

-12
-80%

-10
-30%

-52
-41%

-4
-100%

-58
-37%

-5
-83%

-46
-39%

-5
-28%

-41
-39%

-6
-29%

5
5%

Don't know

10
6%

7
7%

3
5%

5
8%

3
7%

2
4%

AGREE

27
16%

15
15%

12
18%

11
17%

6
15%

9
20%

DISAGREE

93

50
50%

43

26
41%

26

28

63%c

62%c

-35
-35%

-31
-48%

-15
-23%

-20
-49%

56%acj

NET AGREE

-66
-40%

31%za

66%za

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

-19
-42%

18**

104

Oppose
(o)

15%a

118

Support
(n)

100

25

6**

Support
(l)

Strongly disagree

156

Dissatisfied
(k)

165

41%c

4**

Satisfied
(j)

Support for building in


district

Strongly agree

Total

128

Other uni
(i)

Support for building in area

21**

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 67

Q.17e. Thinking about what you know or have heard about employment in the district of Canterbury, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
There are plenty of employment opportunities in this area for graduates
Base : All students

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

62*

50*

40*

74*

53*

66*

34*

17**

32*

87*

21**

32*

85*

23**

21**

16%D

13
21%

7
14%

4
5%

9
17%

12
18%

4
12%

4
24%

5
16%

10
11%

6
29%

4
13%

12
14%

8
35%

2
10%

Neither agree nor


disagree

35

18

21%BD

29%B

6
8%

11
21%

13
20%

8
24%

3
18%

10
31%

17
20%

4
19%

8
25%

18
21%

3
13%

5
24%

Tend to disagree

68

26
42%

24
45%

26
39%

16
47%

8
47%

6
19%

44
51%zI

7
33%

12
38%

39
46%

7
30%

9
43%

8
15%

9
14%

4
12%

1
6%

6
19%

13
15%

4
19%

4
13%

14
16%

2
9%

4
19%

3
4%

1
2%

6
9%

2
6%

1
6%

3
3%

16%zJ

2
2%

3
13%

1
5%

4
5%

9
17%

12
18%

4
12%

4
24%

5
16%

10
11%

6
29%

4
13%

12
14%

8
35%

2
10%

32
60%

35
53%

20
59%

9
53%

12
38%

57

11
52%

16
50%

53
62%

9
39%

13
62%

-23
-43%

-23
-35%

-16
-47%

-5
-29%

-7
-22%

-47
-54%

-5
-24%

-12
-38%

-41
-48%

-1
-4%

-11
-52%

Total

165

Strongly agree

Tend to agree

27

41%CI

Strongly disagree

25
15%AC

Don't know

10
6%M

AGREE

27
16%D

DISAGREE

93
56%ACI

NET AGREE

-66
-40%

19
48%zD

4
8%

8
20%

22
44%

9
23%

41

2
5%

20

55%zC

1
2%

17

4
6%

13
21%

7
14%

19

27
44%

39

11
28%

61

-14
-23%

-32
-64%

8
20%

-57
-77%

34%zA

78%zA

2
5%
48%zD

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

27%zC

82%zC

66%zI

13%M

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 68

Q.17f. Thinking about what you know or have heard about employment in the district of Canterbury, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
I would be happy living here in Canterbury and commuting to a job elsewhere
Base : All students

Student residence
Total
(z)
Total
Strongly agree

165
16
10%ah

On campus
(a)
100
6
6%

Off campus
(b)
65*
10
15%a

Year of study
1st year
(c)
64*

2nd year
(d)

3rd/ final year


(e)

41*

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

45*

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)
15**

6
9%

2
5%

7
16%

1
7%

33*
7
21%zh

Uni of Kent
(h)
128

Other uni
(i)
4**

Satisfied
(j)
156

Dissatisfied
(k)
6**

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

118

Support
(n)

18**

104

Oppose
(o)
21**

8
6%

1
25%

15
10%

1
17%

13
11%

2
11%

11
11%

2
10%

Tend to agree

80
48%

49
49%

31
48%

29
45%

23
56%

20
44%

8
53%

13
39%

65
51%

2
50%

78
50%

2
33%

56
47%

12
67%

51
49%

11
52%

Neither agree nor


disagree

22
13%

14
14%

8
12%

12
19%

4
10%

5
11%

1
7%

3
9%

19
15%

22
14%

15
13%

1
6%

12
12%

3
14%

Tend to disagree

29
18%

21
21%

8
12%

13
20%

5
12%

7
16%

4
27%

8
24%

21
16%

28
18%

1
17%

22
19%

3
17%

21
20%

4
19%

Strongly disagree

17

9
9%

8
12%

3
5%

10%cj

6
13%

1
7%

2
6%

14
11%

1
25%

12
8%

2
33%

12
10%

9
9%

1
5%

1
1%

1
1%

1
2%

1
1%

1
1%

AGREE

96
58%

55
55%

41
63%

35
55%

25
61%

27
60%

9
60%

20
61%

73
57%

3
75%

93
60%

3
50%

69
58%

14
78%

62
60%

13
62%

DISAGREE

46
28%j

30
30%

16
25%

16
25%

12
29%

13
29%

5
33%

10
30%

35
27%

1
25%

40
26%

3
50%

34
29%

3
17%

30
29%

5
24%

50
30%

25
25%

25
38%

19
30%

13
32%

14
31%

4
27%

10
30%

38
30%

2
50%

53

0
0%

35
30%

11
61%

32
31%

8
38%

Don't know

NET AGREE

17%c

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

34%z

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 69

Q.17f. Thinking about what you know or have heard about employment in the district of Canterbury, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
I would be happy living here in Canterbury and commuting to a job elsewhere
Base : All students

Enough homes
Total
(z)
Total
Strongly agree
Tend to agree

165
16
10%
80
48%

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

62*
5
8%
38
61%zB

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)
66*

Option selection

Less homes
(G)
34*

A
(H)

B
(I)
17**

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

50*

40*

74*

53*

32*

87*

21**

7
14%

5
13%

8
11%

8
15%

4
6%

3
9%

1
6%

10
11%I

4
19%

32*
1
3%

20
40%

20
50%

31
42%

21
40%

37
56%

17
50%

4
24%

19
59%

42
48%

9
43%

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

85*

23**

21**

13
15%z

2
10%

17
53%

40
47%

10
43%

10
48%

Neither agree nor


disagree

22

4
6%

6
12%

4
10%

13
18%

6
11%

11
17%

4
12%

5
29%

3
9%

12
14%

2
10%

6
19%

10
12%

3
13%

2
10%

Tend to disagree

29
18%

9
15%

10
20%

4
10%

16
22%

13
25%

8
12%

8
24%

3
18%

9
28%

12
14%

5
24%

4
13%

13
15%

6
26%

6
29%

Strongly disagree

17
10%

6
10%

7
14%

7
18%

6
8%

5
9%

5
8%

2
6%

4
24%

1
3%

10
11%

1
5%

4
13%

8
9%

4
17%

1
5%

1
1%

1
2%

1
1%

1
1%

96
58%

43
69%z

27
54%

25
63%

39
53%

29
55%

41
62%

20
59%

5
29%

19
59%

52
60%

13
62%

18
56%

53
62%

10
43%

12
57%

DISAGREE

46
28%

15
24%

17
34%

11
28%

22
30%

18
34%

13
20%

10
29%

7
41%

10
31%

22
25%

6
29%

8
25%

21
25%

10
43%

7
33%

NET AGREE

50
30%

28

10
20%

14
35%

17
23%

11
21%

28

10
29%

-2
-12%

9
28%

30
34%

7
33%

10
31%

32

0
0%

5
24%

Don't know
AGREE

13%A

45%zB

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

42%zE

38%z

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 70

Q.17g. Thinking about what you know or have heard about employment in the district of Canterbury, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Canterbury is a good place to set up a business
Base : All students

Student residence
Total
(z)
Total
Strongly agree

165
15
9%a

On campus
(a)
100
5
5%

Off campus
(b)
65*
10
15%za

Year of study
1st year
(c)
64*

2nd year
(d)

3rd/ final year


(e)

41*

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

45*

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)
15**

33*

Uni of Kent
(h)
128

Other uni
(i)
4**

Satisfied
(j)
156

Dissatisfied
(k)
6**

Support
(l)
118

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

18**

104

Oppose
(o)
21**

4
6%

7
17%

3
7%

1
7%

4
12%

11
9%

14
9%

12
10%

11
11%

Tend to agree

76
46%

49
49%

27
42%

31
48%

18
44%

21
47%

6
40%

16
48%

58
45%

2
50%

72
46%

3
50%

55
47%

11
61%

47
45%

14
67%

Neither agree nor


disagree

43

32

26%b

32%zb

11
17%

20
31%

9
22%

8
18%

6
40%

7
21%

35
27%

1
25%

40
26%

2
33%

28
24%

3
17%

27
26%

3
14%

Tend to disagree

20

6
9%

5
12%

8
18%

1
7%

3
9%

16
13%

1
25%

20
13%

16
14%

2
11%

14
13%

2
10%

12%a

Strongly disagree

2
1%j

Don't know

9
5%n

AGREE

91
55%

DISAGREE

22
13%a

NET AGREE

69
42%

8
8%

12
18%a

1
1%

1
2%

1
2%

1
2%

2
2%

1
1%

1
17%

2
2%

2
2%

5
5%

4
6%

3
5%

1
2%

4
9%

1
7%

3
9%

6
5%

9
6%

5
4%

2
11%

3
3%

2
10%

54
54%

37
57%

35
55%

25
61%

24
53%

7
47%

20
61%

69
54%

2
50%

86
55%

3
50%

67
57%

11
61%

58
56%

14
67%

6
9%

6
15%

9
20%

1
7%

3
9%

18
14%

1
25%

21
13%

1
17%

18
15%

2
11%

16
15%

2
10%

29
45%

19
46%

15
33%

6
40%

17
52%

51
40%

1
25%

65
42%

2
33%

49
42%

9
50%

42
40%

12
57%

9
9%
45
45%

13
20%a

24
37%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 71

Q.17g. Thinking about what you know or have heard about employment in the district of Canterbury, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Canterbury is a good place to set up a business
Base : All students

Enough homes
Total
(z)
Total

165

Agree
(A)
62*

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

50*

40*

15
9%

10

76
46%

32
52%

21
42%

21
53%

Neither agree nor


disagree

43

10
16%

10
20%

9
23%

Tend to disagree

20

Strongly agree
Tend to agree

26%A

16%z

4
8%

Disagree
(D)

23%zD

53*

66*

Option selection

Less homes
(G)
34*

5
7%

6
11%

5
8%

2
6%

31
42%

23
43%

29
44%

22

19
26%

15
28%

15

8
15%

16
50%

39
45%

8
38%

18
56%

35
41%

11
48%

12
57%

21
32%

5
15%

4
24%

8
25%

26
30%

5
24%

6
19%

21
25%

8
35%

6
29%

6
9%

3
9%

2
12%

3
9%

11
13%

3
14%

4
13%

11
13%

3
13%

1
5%

1
1%

1
5%

2
2%

2
12%

3
9%

3
3%

2
6%

5
6%

2
10%

71%z

9
53%

18
56%

46
53%

12
57%

20
63%

46
54%

12
52%

12
57%

3
9%

2
12%

3
9%

12
14%

4
19%

4
13%

13
15%

3
13%

1
5%

7
41%

15
47%

34
39%

8
38%

16
50%

33
39%

9
39%

11
52%

Don't know

9
5%

4
6%

2
4%

3
4%

2
6%

25
50%

30

36
49%

29
55%

34
52%

16
22%zC

9
17%

6
9%

20
27%

20
38%

28
42%

NET AGREE

13

69

36

42%BD

58%zB

12
24%

26%zA

1
3%
29
73%zD

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

21**

8
47%

6
10%

23**

65%z

13%C

85*

1
2%

22

32*

Housing
(O)

1
4%

1
1%

DISAGREE

21**

Population
growth
(N)

11
13%

75%zD

87*

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)
2
6%

1
2%

68%z

32*

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)
4
19%

1
2%

42

17**

C
(J)
7
8%

2
1%

91
55%

B
(I)
2
6%

Strongly disagree

20%zC

A
(H)
1
6%

12%C

24%zA

1
3%

74*

The same
(F)

5
8%

AGREE

12

Future development
More homes
(E)

8%E

24

21
62%zE

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 72

Q.17. Summary Table. Thinking about what you know or have heard about employment in the district of Canterbury, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Base : All answering

a. There are
plenty of
b. I would be
employment willing to move
opportunities
out of the
c. We should do
in this area
district to
more to help
for the current take a better
businesses to
population
job
set up here
Total

165

165

d. We should do
more to
encourage
university
e. There are
f. I would be
graduates to
plenty of
happy living
stay in the
employment
here in
g. Canterbury
district when
opportunities Canterbury and is a good place
they finish
in this area commuting to a
to set up a
studying
for graduates job elsewhere
business

165

165

165

165

165

Strongly agree

5
3%

64
39%

52
32%

48
29%

16
10%

15
9%

Tend to agree

35
21%

67
41%

75
45%

66
40%

27
16%

80
48%

76
46%

Neither agree nor


disagree

43
26%

14
8%

30
18%

29
18%

35
21%

22
13%

43
26%

Tend to disagree

54
33%

8
5%

3
2%

16
10%

68
41%

29
18%

20
12%

Strongly disagree

20
12%

9
5%

2
1%

6
4%

25
15%

17
10%

2
1%

8
5%

3
2%

3
2%

10
6%

1
1%

9
5%

AGREE

40
24%

131
79%

127
77%

114
69%

27
16%

96
58%

91
55%

DISAGREE

74
45%

17
10%

5
3%

22
13%

93
56%

46
28%

22
13%

-34
-21%

114
69%

122
74%

92
56%

-66
-40%

50
30%

69
42%

Don't know

NET AGREE

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 73

Q.18.1. Still thinking about the district of Canterbury, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
It is a good place to live
Base : All students

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

Oppose
(m)

41*

45*

15**

33*

33
52%

23
56%

25
56%

8
53%

20
61%

67
52%

2
50%

84
54%

3
50%

69
58%

10
56%

62
60%

10
48%

Tend to agree

66
40%

40
40%

26
40%

28
44%

16
39%

17
38%

5
33%

11
33%

53
41%

2
50%

65
42%

1
17%

44
37%

8
44%

37
36%

11
52%

Neither agree nor


disagree

5
5%

2
3%

3
5%

2
4%

2
13%

2
6%

5
4%

6
4%

2
2%

2
2%

Tend to disagree

2
1%j

1
1%

1
2%

1
2%

1
2%

2
2%

1
1%

1
17%

2
2%

2
2%

Strongly disagree

1
1%

1
2%

1
2%

1
1%

1
17%

1
1%

1
1%

Don't know

155
94%

94
94%

61
94%

61
95%

39
95%

42
93%

13
87%

31
94%

120
94%

4
100%

96%z

4
67%

113
96%

18
100%

99
95%

21
100%

1
1%

2
3%

2
5%

1
2%

1
1%

2
33%

3
3%

3
3%

93
93%

59
91%

61
95%

37
90%

41
91%

13
87%

31
94%

2
33%

110
93%

18
100%

96
92%

21
100%

2%j

NET AGREE

152
92%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

3
2%
117
91%

4
100%

148
95%z

18**

104

Oppose
(o)

64*

DISAGREE

118

Support
(n)

35
54%

149

6**

Support
(l)

65*

AGREE

156

Dissatisfied
(k)

54
54%

4%ln

4**

Satisfied
(j)

89
54%

165

128

Other uni
(i)

Strongly agree

Total

100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study

21**

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 74

Q.18.1. Still thinking about the district of Canterbury, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
It is a good place to live
Base : All students

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

62*

50*

40*

74*

53*

66*

34*

17**

32*

87*

21**

32*

85*

23**

21**

Strongly agree

89
54%

33
53%

26
52%

23
58%

41
55%

27
51%

39
59%

19
56%

9
53%

15
47%

46
53%

15
71%

16
50%

50
59%

14
61%

8
38%

Tend to agree

66
40%

26
42%

21
42%

15
38%

27
36%

21
40%

22
33%

15
44%

8
47%

15
47%

34
39%

5
24%

14
44%

30
35%

7
30%

12
57%

Total

165

7
4%

1
2%

2
4%

1
3%

4
5%

3
6%

4
6%

2
6%

5
6%

2
6%

2
2%

2
9%

1
5%

Tend to disagree

2
1%

2
3%

1
3%

1
1%

1
2%

1
2%

1
1%

1
5%

2
2%

Strongly disagree

1
1%

1
2%

1
1%

1
2%

1
1%

1
1%

Don't know

155
94%

59
95%

47
94%

38
95%

68
92%

48
91%

61
92%

34
100%

17
100%

30
94%

80
92%

20
95%

30
94%

80
94%

21
91%

20
95%

3
2%

2
3%

1
2%

1
3%

2
3%

2
4%

1
2%

2
2%

1
5%

3
4%

152
92%

57
92%

46
92%

37
93%

66
89%

46
87%

60
91%

17
100%

30
94%

78
90%

19
90%

30
94%

77
91%

21
91%

20
95%

Neither agree nor


disagree

AGREE
DISAGREE
NET AGREE

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

34
100%E

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 75

Q.18.2. Still thinking about the district of Canterbury, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
It is a bad place to be a student
Base : All students

Student residence
Total
(z)
Total
Strongly agree
Tend to agree

On campus
(a)

7%c

7%c

4
3%

5
3%

1
17%

3
3%

2
11%

3
3%

1
5%

8
5%

4
4%

4
6%

2
3%

3
7%

3
7%

1
3%

7
5%

7
4%

7
6%

7
7%

7
7%

4
6%

6
9%

2
5%

3
7%

1
3%

10
8%

11
7%

3
3%

2
11%

4
4%

2
10%

38
38%

44%ac

20
31%

54%za

6
6%

8
12%

2
3%

140
85%

87
87%

53
82%

-126
-76%

-81
-81%

-45
-69%

14
8%c

NET AGREE

35

56%zd

18**

104

Oppose
(o)

2
6%

36

118

Support
(n)

73

DISAGREE

Oppose
(m)

15**

18
28%

6**

Support
(l)

49%zb

156

Dissatisfied
(k)

45*

49

4**

Satisfied
(j)

41%bd

128

Other uni
(i)

41*

7%ln

33*

Uni of Kent
(h)

67

AGREE

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

64*

Tend to disagree

Don't know

3rd/ final year


(e)

4
6%

11

Strongly disagree

2nd year
(d)

2
2%

Neither agree nor


disagree

65*

1st year
(c)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

6
4%

165

100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study

21**

9
22%

19
42%d

3
20%

11
33%

54
42%

2
50%

62
40%

4
67%

46
39%

9
50%

37
36%

13
62%

24

17
38%

12
80%

18
55%

53
41%

2
50%

71
46%

1
17%

59

5
28%

53

5
24%

10
8%

2
11%

10
10%

1
5%

14
78%

90
87%

18
86%

-12
-67%

-80
-77%

-17
-81%

59%zc

15%c

13%c

3
9%

11
9%

12
8%

1
17%

56
88%

33
80%

36
80%

15
100%

29
88%

107
84%

4
100%

133
85%

5
83%

-54
-84%

-27
-66%

-30
-67%

-15
-100%

-26
-79%

-96
-75%

-4
-100%

-121
-78%

-4
-67%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

50%z

105
89%z

-95
-81%

51%z

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 76

Q.18.2. Still thinking about the district of Canterbury, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
It is a bad place to be a student
Base : All students

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

40*

Future development
More homes
(E)

74*

53*

The same
(F)
66*

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

87*

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

21**

32*

85*

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

34*

17**

32*

23**

21**

6
4%

1
2%

4
8%

1
3%

4
5%

4
8%

1
2%

5
6%

1
5%

1
3%

3
4%

1
4%

1
5%

Tend to agree

8
5%

5
8%

2
4%

2
5%

4
5%

1
2%

5
8%

2
6%

1
3%

4
5%

2
10%

2
6%

4
5%

1
4%

1
5%

165

50*

Disagree
(D)

Strongly agree

Total

62*

Agree
(C)

11
7%

4
6%

2
4%

4
10%

3
4%

2
4%

7
11%

1
3%

1
6%

2
6%

7
8%

1
5%

2
6%

6
7%

1
4%

Tend to disagree

67
41%

26
42%

19
38%

12
30%

33
45%

24
45%

21
32%

16
47%

9
53%

10
31%

35
40%

8
38%

16
50%

33
39%

8
35%

9
43%

Strongly disagree

73
44%

26
42%

23
46%

21
53%

30
41%

22
42%

32
48%

15
44%

7
41%

19
59%

36
41%

9
43%

11
34%

39
46%

12
52%

10
48%

14
8%

6
10%

6
12%

3
8%

8
11%

5
9%

6
9%

2
6%

1
3%

9
10%

3
14%

3
9%

7
8%

2
9%

2
10%

140
85%

52
84%

42
84%

33
83%

63
85%

46
87%

53
80%

31
91%

16
94%

29
91%

71
82%

17
81%

27
84%

72
85%

20
87%

19
90%

-126
-76%

-46
-74%

-36
-72%

-30
-75%

-55
-74%

-41
-77%

-47
-71%

-29
-85%

-16
-94%

-28
-88%

-62
-71%

-14
-67%

-24
-75%

-65
-76%

-18
-78%

-17
-81%

Neither agree nor


disagree

Don't know
AGREE
DISAGREE
NET AGREE

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 77

Q.18.3. Still thinking about the district of Canterbury, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
It is a good place to spend an evening out
Base : All students

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

Support
(n)

45*

15**

33*

17

32%ac

42%za

41%c

14
31%

7
47%

15
45%

37
29%

49
31%

3
50%

41
35%

4
22%

35
34%

5
24%

Tend to agree

72
44%

49
49%

23
35%

34
53%

16
39%

16
36%

6
40%

10
30%

60
47%

2
50%

69
44%

2
33%

50
42%

10
56%

45
43%

12
57%

Neither agree nor


disagree

16
10%

13
13%

3
5%

9
14%

2
5%

4
9%

1
7%

3
9%

13
10%

14
9%

10
8%

1
6%

11
11%

1
5%

Tend to disagree

15
9%

6
6%

9
14%

4
6%

4
10%

7
16%

2
6%

11
9%

2
50%

15
10%

11
9%

2
11%

8
8%

2
10%

Strongly disagree

8
5%

5
5%

3
5%

2
3%

2
5%

4
9%

3
9%

5
4%

7
4%

1
17%

4
3%

1
6%

3
3%

1
5%

Don't know

2
1%

2
2%

1
2%

1
7%

2
2%

2
1%

2
2%

2
2%

124
75%

74
74%

50
77%

48
75%

33
80%

30
67%

13
87%

25
76%

97
76%

2
50%

118
76%

5
83%

91
77%

14
78%

80
77%

17
81%

23
14%

11
11%

12
18%

6
9%

6
15%

11

5
15%

16
13%

2
50%

22
14%

1
17%

15
13%

3
17%

11
11%

3
14%

63
63%

38
58%

42

27

66%e

66%e

19
42%

13
87%

20
61%

81
63%

0
0%

96
62%

4
67%

76
64%

11
61%

69
66%

14
67%

NET AGREE

101
61%e

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

18**

104

Oppose
(o)

41*

24%zc

118

Oppose
(m)

14
22%

DISAGREE

6**

Support
(l)

64*

AGREE

156

Dissatisfied
(k)

27

52

4**

Satisfied
(j)

65*

165

128

Other uni
(i)

25
25%

Total
Strongly agree

100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study

21**

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 78

Q.18.3. Still thinking about the district of Canterbury, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
It is a good place to spend an evening out
Base : All students

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

62*

50*

40*

74*

53*

66*

34*

17**

32*

87*

21**

32*

85*

23**

21**

Strongly agree

52
32%

21
34%

17
34%

16
40%

28
38%

16
30%

24
36%

11
32%

2
12%

12
38%

31
36%

6
29%

7
22%

28
33%

10
43%

7
33%

Tend to agree

72
44%

29
47%

17
34%

15
38%

28
38%

21
40%

31
47%

13
38%

6
35%

15
47%

40
46%

8
38%

14
44%

40
47%

6
26%

11
52%

Neither agree nor


disagree

Total

165

16
10%

6
10%

4
8%

4
10%

5
7%

7
13%

7
11%

2
6%

4
24%

3
9%

6
7%

3
14%

4
13%

5
6%

3
13%

2
10%

Tend to disagree

15
9%

4
6%

6
12%

1
3%

9
12%

6
11%

4
6%

4
12%

3
18%

2
6%

6
7%

2
10%

4
13%

7
8%

2
9%

1
5%

Strongly disagree

8
5%

2
3%

5
10%

3
8%

3
4%

2
4%

4
12%F

1
6%

3
3%

2
10%

2
6%

5
6%

1
4%

2
1%

1
2%

1
3%

1
1%

1
2%

1
6%

1
1%

1
3%

1
4%

124
75%

50
81%

34
68%

31
78%

56
76%

37
70%

55

24
71%

8
47%

27
84%

82%z

14
67%

21
66%

68
80%

16
70%

18
86%

23

6
10%

11
22%

4
10%

12
16%

8
15%

8
24%F

4
24%

2
6%

9
10%

4
19%

6
19%

12
14%

3
13%

1
5%

44

23
46%

27
68%

44
59%

29
55%

16
47%

4
24%

25

62

78%z

71%z

10
48%

15
47%

56
66%

13
57%

17
81%

Don't know
AGREE
DISAGREE

14%F

NET AGREE

101
61%B

71%zB

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

83%z

4
6%
51
77%zEG

71

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 79

Q.18.4. Still thinking about the district of Canterbury, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
It is a bad place for a graduate to get a graduate job
Base : All students

Student residence
Total
(z)
Total
Strongly agree

On campus
(a)

165
20
12%ac

Tend to agree

45
27%cg

100
4
4%

Off campus
(b)
65*
16
25%za

Year of study
1st year
(c)
64*
2
3%

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

41*

45*

15**

4
27%

3
9%

15%c

18%c

33*

Uni of Kent
(h)
128

Other uni
(i)
4**

Satisfied
(j)
156

Dissatisfied
(k)
6**

Support
(l)
118

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

18**

104

Oppose
(o)
21**

15
12%

2
50%

18
12%

2
33%

14
12%

4
22%

12
12%

4
19%

1
25%

41
26%

3
50%

34
29%

3
17%

29
28%

5
24%

29
29%

16
25%

10
16%

11
27%

20

4
27%

4
12%

40

44%zc

31%zg

Neither agree nor


disagree

50

35
35%

15
23%

30

12

30%e

47%ze

29%e

5
11%

3
20%

14
42%

36
28%

47
30%

1
17%

36
31%

4
22%

32
31%

5
24%

Tend to disagree

31
19%

22
22%

9
14%

15
23%

8
20%

6
13%

2
13%

8
24%

23
18%

31
20%

23
19%

4
22%

21
20%

4
19%

Strongly disagree

8
5%

4
4%

4
6%

4
6%

2
5%

2
4%

2
6%

6
5%

8
5%

6
5%

5
5%

6
6%

5
8%

3
5%

2
5%

4
9%

2
13%

2
6%

8
6%

1
25%

11
7%

5
4%

3
17%

5
5%

3
14%

3
75%

59
38%

5
83%

48
41%

7
39%

41
39%

9
43%

39
25%

29
25%

4
22%

26
25%

4
19%

3
75%

20
13%

5
83%

19
16%

3
17%

15
14%

5
24%

Don't know

11
7%l

33
33%

32

28

41%c

62%zc

8
53%

7
21%

55

49%za

12
19%

17

39%acg

DISAGREE

39
24%

26
26%

13
20%

19
30%

10
24%

8
18%

2
13%

10
30%

29
23%

NET AGREE

26

-7
-11%

7
17%

20

6
40%

-3
-9%

26

AGREE

65

16%acgj

7
7%

19
29%za

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

44%zcd

43%g

20%zg

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 80

Q.18.4. Still thinking about the district of Canterbury, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
It is a bad place for a graduate to get a graduate job
Base : All students

Enough homes
Total
(z)
Total

165

Agree
(A)
62*

20
12%

4
6%

45
27%

12
19%

Neither agree nor


disagree

50

24

30%B

Tend to disagree

31
8
5%
11
7%

Strongly agree
Tend to agree

19%D

Strongly disagree
Don't know
AGREE

65
39%AC

DISAGREE

39
24%D

NET AGREE

26
16%AC

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

50*
11

Disagree
(D)
40*

74*

21**

32*

85*

23**

21**

9
10%

2
10%

4
13%

12
14%

3
14%

35%z

18
34%

18
27%

8
24%

6
35%

6
19%

26
30%

6
29%

8
25%

23
27%

6
26%

7
33%

14
35%

17
23%

17
32%

19
29%

11
32%

4
24%

10
31%

29
33%

6
29%

9
28%

23
27%

10
43%

6
29%

11

9
12%

6
11%

15
23%

7
21%

3
18%

7
22%

17
20%

3
14%

5
16%

18
21%

4
17%

4
19%

1
2%

1
3%

3
3%

4
19%

6
7%

2
9%

3
4%

1
4%

1
5%

6
12%

3
5%

5
10%

4
10%

2
3%

4
6%

3
6%

2
5%

4
5%

18
36%zA

Housing
(O)

87*

7
14%

-2
-3%

Population
growth
(N)

4
13%

39%B

11
22%

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

32*

15
24%

18
29%

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

2
12%

26

58%zA

C
(J)

17**

7
18%

29

B
(I)

6
18%

18
36%

16
26%

A
(H)

34*

28%D

22%zC

11%zFG

66*

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

6
9%

16

53*

The same
(F)

4
8%

2
5%

22%zA

Future development
More homes
(E)

2
4%

7
11%

2
6%

2
12%

4
13%

3
3%

19%zM

9
23%

42
57%zC

22
42%

24
36%

14
41%

8
47%

10
31%

35
40%

8
38%

12
38%

35
41%

6
26%

10
48%

15

11
15%

12
23%

16
24%

7
21%

3
18%

8
25%

20
23%

7
33%

5
16%

24
28%

6
26%

4
19%

31

10
19%

8
12%

7
21%

5
29%

2
6%

15
17%

1
5%

7
22%

11
13%

0
0%

6
29%

38%zD

-6
-15%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

42%zC

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 81

Q.18. Summary Table. Still thinking about the district of Canterbury, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Base : All students

1. It is a good
place to live
Total

165

2. It is a bad
place to be a
student
165

4. It is a bad
3. It is a good
place for a
place to spend graduate to get
an evening out a graduate job
165

165

Strongly agree

89
54%

6
4%

52
32%

20
12%

Tend to agree

66
40%

8
5%

72
44%

45
27%

Neither agree nor


disagree

7
4%

11
7%

16
10%

50
30%

Tend to disagree

2
1%

67
41%

15
9%

31
19%

Strongly disagree

1
1%

73
44%

8
5%

8
5%

Don't know

2
1%

11
7%

155
94%

14
8%

124
75%

65
39%

3
2%

140
85%

23
14%

39
24%

152
92%

-126
-76%

101
61%

26
16%

AGREE
DISAGREE
NET AGREE

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 82

Q.19. Can I just check, how long, in total, have you lived in this area?
Base : All Respondents

Student residence
Total
(z)
Total
Under 3 months
3 months up to 1 year
1 year up to 2 years

On campus
(a)

165
3
2%

3
3%

65*
-

63

53

38%bde

53%zb

39

14
14%

25

15
15%

22

24%acj

2 years up to 3 years

100

Off campus
(b)

37
22%ac

10
15%
38%za
34%za

Year of study
1st year
(c)
64*
2
3%
54
84%zde

4
6%
1
2%

2nd year
(d)

3rd/ final year


(e)

41*

45*

3
7%
27
66%zce

7
17%c

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation
Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)
15**

33*

Uni of Kent
(h)
128

Other uni
(i)
4**

Satisfied
(j)
156

Dissatisfied
(k)
6**

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

118

Support
(n)

18**

104

Oppose
(o)
21**

1
7%

1
3%

2
2%

3
2%

2
2%

1
6%

2
2%

1
5%

2
4%

4
27%

15
45%

47
37%

1
25%

61
39%

1
17%

50
42%

4
22%

44
42%

6
29%

6
13%

2
13%

7
21%

32
25%

34
22%

4
67%

33
28%z

2
11%

27
26%

2
10%

1
7%

8
24%

28
22%

1
25%

36
23%

1
17%

22
19%

7
39%

19
18%

6
29%

2
13%

10
8%

9
6%

9
8%

9
9%

1
5%

1
3%

1
1%

2
1%

6
5%

6
4%

1
1%

3
17%

1
1%

4
19%

28
62%zcd

6%c

7
7%

3
5%

2
5%

5 years up to 10 years

2
1%

2
3%

1
2%

10 years up to 20 years

4%ln

6%b

2
3%

1
2%

Over 20 years/all my
life

4
2%hl

1
1%

3
5%

1
2%

2
4%

1
7%

1
3%

1
1%

2
50%

4
3%

1
1%

1
6%

1
1%

1
5%

Don't know

1
1%

1
1%

1
2%

1
1%

1
1%

1
1%

3 years up to 5 years

10

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

6
13%zc

1
7%
3
20%

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 83

Q.19. Can I just check, how long, in total, have you lived in this area?
Base : All Respondents

Enough homes
Total
(z)
Total
Under 3 months

165
3
2%

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

62*

50*

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)
40*

Future development
More homes
(E)

74*

53*

The same
(F)
66*

34*

A
(H)

B
(I)
17**

C
(J)
32*

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

87*

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)
21**

32*

85*

Population
growth
(N)
23**

Housing
(O)
21**

1
2%

1
3%

1
1%

1
2%

1
2%

1
3%

1
6%

2
2%

1
3%

1
1%

1
4%

30

17
43%

20
27%

18
34%

29
44%

11
32%

7
41%

17

27
31%

11
52%

12
38%

31
36%

10
43%

9
43%

3
9%

2
12%

5
16%

27
31%z

5
24%

4
13%

25
29%

3
13%

5
24%

7
21%

2
12%

4
13%

22
25%

4
19%

7
22%

22
26%

3
13%

4
19%

2
12%

1
3%

6
7%

1
5%

1
3%

3
4%

3
13%

3
14%

1
3%

1
1%

1
3%

1
4%

3
9%J

1
1%

3
9%

2
2%

1
4%

3 months up to 1 year

63
38%BDJ

48%zB

12
24%

1 year up to 2 years

39

11
22%

11
28%

18
24%

16

17

24%G

16
26%

30%G

26%G

37
22%

13
21%

17

7
18%

19
26%

12
23%

14
21%

2
5%

6
8%

3
6%

2
3%

2 years up to 3 years

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

34%z

6%A

1
2%

5 years up to 10 years

2
1%

1
2%

2
3%

1
2%

1
2%

10 years up to 20 years

6
4%J

1
2%

1
2%

2
5%

3
4%

1
2%

2
3%

3
9%

Over 20 years/all my
life

4
2%

1
2%

2
4%

4
5%

1
2%

3
9%zF

1
6%

1
3%

2
6%

1
1%

1
4%

Don't know

1
1%

1
1%

1
3%

1
1%

1
3%

3 years up to 5 years

10

5
10%

53%J

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

15%zF

2
12%

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 84

Q.20.1. How likely or unlikely do you think it is that you will be doing the following in 5 year's time?
Living in Canterbury
Base : All

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

64*

2nd year
(d)

3rd/ final year


(e)

Uni of Kent
(h)

Support
(n)

15
10%

11
9%

2
11%

10
10%

2
10%

28%e

8
20%

5
11%

6
40%

8
24%

27
21%

2
50%

35
22%

2
33%

27
23%

6
33%

25
24%

6
29%

48%za

19
30%

20
49%

20
44%

4
27%

12
36%

49
38%

2
50%

61
39%

44
37%

7
39%

43
41%

7
33%

28
28%

15
23%

19
30%

10
24%

12
27%

2
13%

6
18%

37
29%

38
24%

4
67%

31
26%

3
17%

22
21%

5
24%

7
4%

4
4%

3
5%

5
8%

2
4%

1
3%

6
5%

7
4%

5
4%

4
4%

1
5%

52
32%

36
36%

16
25%

21
33%

11
27%

11
24%

9
60%

14
42%

36
28%

2
50%

50
32%

2
33%

38
32%

8
44%

35
34%

8
38%

NOT LIKELY

106
64%

60
60%

46
71%

38
59%

30
73%

32
71%

6
40%

18
55%

86
67%

2
50%

99
63%

4
67%

75
64%

10
56%

65
63%

12
57%

NET LIKELY

-54
-33%

-24
-24%

-30
-46%

-17
-27%

-19
-46%

-21
-47%

3
20%

-4
-12%

-50
-39%

0
0%

-49
-31%

-2
-33%

-37
-31%

-2
-11%

-30
-29%

-4
-19%

37

25
25%

12
18%

18

32
32%

31

22%e

Not very likely

63
38%a

Not at all likely

43
26%j

Don't know
LIKELY

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

18**

104

Oppose
(o)

9
7%

Fairly likely

118

Oppose
(m)

6
18%

3
5%

6**

Support
(l)

33*

4
6%

156

Dissatisfied
(k)

3
20%

11
11%

4**

Satisfied
(j)

15**

15
9%

128

Other uni
(i)

6
13%

Very likely

41*

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

45*

165

65*

1st year
(c)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3
7%

Total

100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study

21**

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 85

Q.20.1. How likely or unlikely do you think it is that you will be doing the following in 5 year's time?
Living in Canterbury
Base : All

Enough homes
Total
(z)
Total
Very likely

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

165

62*

50*

40*

15

6
10%

7
14%

8
20%zD

9%J

Future development
More homes
(E)

74*

53*

The same
(F)
66*

Option selection

Less homes
(G)
34*

A
(H)

B
(I)
17**

5
7%

7
13%

3
5%

5
15%

1
6%

C
(J)
32*
5
16%J

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

87*

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)
21**

32*

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

85*

23**

21**

3
3%

5
24%

3
9%

9
11%

3
13%

20
23%

5
24%

9
28%

17
20%

2
9%

8
38%

Fairly likely

37
22%

10
16%

12
24%

9
23%

17
23%

15
28%

14
21%

6
18%

5
29%

6
19%

Not very likely

63
38%C

26
42%

19
38%

10
25%

32
43%

19
36%

29
44%

13
38%

7
41%

12
38%

35
40%

5
24%

12
38%

33
39%

9
39%

8
38%

Not at all likely

43
26%

17
27%

12
24%

12
30%

17
23%

11
21%

18
27%

7
21%

3
18%

9
28%

25
29%

6
29%

5
16%

23
27%

9
39%

5
24%

7
4%

3
5%

1
3%

3
4%

1
2%

2
3%

3
9%

1
6%

4
5%

3
9%

3
4%

52
32%

16
26%

19
38%

17
43%

22
30%

22
42%

17
26%

11
32%

6
35%

11
34%

23
26%

10
48%

12
38%

26
31%

5
22%

8
38%

NOT LIKELY

106
64%

43
69%

31
62%

22
55%

49
66%

30
57%

47
71%

20
59%

10
59%

21
66%

60
69%

11
52%

17
53%

56
66%

18
78%

13
62%

NET LIKELY

-54
-33%

-27
-44%

-12
-24%

-5
-13%

-27
-36%

-8
-15%

-30
-45%

-9
-26%

-4
-24%

-10
-31%

-37
-43%

-1
-5%

-5
-16%

-30
-35%

-13
-57%

-5
-24%

Don't know
LIKELY

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 86

Q.20.2. How likely or unlikely do you think it is that you will be doing the following in 5 year's time?
Working in a full/part-time job in Canterbury
Base : All

Student residence
Total
(z)
Total
Very likely

165

Not at all likely


Don't know
LIKELY
NOT LIKELY

64*

3rd/ final year


(e)

15**

33*

3
20%

5
15%zh

33%ze

8
20%

6
13%

5
33%

51%za

18
28%

19
46%

20
44%

33
33%

16
25%

18
28%

12
29%

4
4%

3
5%

5
8%

2
3%
21

28
28%

33

37%a

49
30%
7
4%

41*

45*

4**

Satisfied
(j)
156

Dissatisfied
(k)
6**

Support
(l)
118

Oppose
(m)
18**

Support
(n)
104

Oppose
(o)
21**

8
5%

5
4%

1
6%

5
5%

2
10%

9
27%

30
23%

1
25%

37
24%

2
33%

29
25%

7
39%

26
25%

7
33%

4
27%

12
36%

46
36%

3
75%

60
38%

46
39%

4
22%

43
41%

3
14%

16
36%

3
20%

6
18%

43
34%z

44
28%

4
67%

33
28%

5
28%

26
25%

7
33%

2
4%

1
3%

6
5%

7
4%

5
4%

1
6%

4
4%

2
10%

10
24%

7
16%

8
53%

14
42%

33
26%

1
25%

45
29%

2
33%

34
29%

8
44%

31
30%

9
43%

7
47%

18
55%

89
70%

3
75%

104
67%

4
67%

79
67%

9
50%

69
66%

10
48%

1
7%

-4
-12%

-56
-44%

-2
-50%

-59
-38%

-2
-33%

-45
-38%

-1
-6%

-38
-37%

-1
-5%

35

13
20%

23

35%zb

61
61%

49
75%

36
56%

31

36

76%c

80%zc

-26
-26%

-36
-55%

-13
-20%

-21
-51%

-62
-38%

128

Other uni
(i)
-

29%be

36%e

Uni of Kent
(h)
3
2%

48
110

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

1
2%

11
17%

61

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

2
5%

29
29%

40

67%c

NET LIKELY

65*

1st year
(c)

2
3%

24%e

Not very likely

100

Off campus
(b)

6
6%

8
5%h

Fairly likely

On campus
(a)

Year of study

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

-29
-64%

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 87

Q.20.2. How likely or unlikely do you think it is that you will be doing the following in 5 year's time?
Working in a full/part-time job in Canterbury
Base : All

Enough homes
Total
(z)
Total

165

Agree
(A)
62*

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)
50*

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)
40*

Future development
More homes
(E)

74*

53*

The same
(F)
66*

Option selection

Less homes
(G)
34*

A
(H)

B
(I)
17**

C
(J)
32*

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

87*

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)
21**

32*

85*

Population
growth
(N)
23**

Housing
(O)
21**

Very likely

8
5%

2
3%

4
8%

1
3%

6
8%

3
6%

2
3%

3
9%

1
6%

2
6%

2
2%

3
14%

1
3%

5
6%

2
9%

Fairly likely

40
24%

15
24%

13
26%

10
25%

17
23%

17
32%

16
24%

6
18%

4
24%

7
22%

21
24%

7
33%

10
31%

20
24%

3
13%

6
29%

Not very likely

61
37%

23
37%

19
38%

13
33%

28
38%

20
38%

27
41%

11
32%

7
41%

14
44%

33
38%

4
19%

12
38%

29
34%

10
43%

9
43%

49

18
29%

14
28%

15
38%

20
27%

12
23%

20
30%

10
29%

3
18%

9
28%

28
32%

7
33%

5
16%

29
34%

8
35%

6
29%

7
4%

4
6%

1
3%

3
4%

1
2%

1
2%

2
12%

3
3%

12%zF

2
2%

48
29%

17
27%

17
34%

11
28%

23
31%

20
38%

18
27%

9
26%

5
29%

9
28%

23
26%

10
48%

11
34%

25
29%

5
22%

6
29%

NOT LIKELY

110
67%

41
66%

33
66%

28
70%

48
65%

32
60%

47
71%

21
62%

10
59%

23
72%

61
70%

11
52%

17
53%

58
68%

18
78%

15
71%

NET LIKELY

-62
-38%

-24
-39%

-16
-32%

-17
-43%

-25
-34%

-12
-23%

-29
-44%

-12
-35%

-5
-29%

-14
-44%

-38
-44%

-1
-5%

-6
-19%

-33
-39%

-13
-57%

-9
-43%

Not at all likely

30%L

Don't know
LIKELY

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

13%zM

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 88

Q.20. Summary Table. How likely or unlikely do you think it is that you will be doing the following in 5 year's time?
Base : All Respondents

1. Living in
Canterbury
Total

165

2. Working in a
full/part-time
job in
Canterbury
165

Very likely

15
9%

8
5%

Fairly likely

37
22%

40
24%

Not very likely

63
38%

61
37%

Not at all likely

43
26%

49
30%

7
4%

7
4%

52
32%

48
29%

NOT LIKELY

106
64%

110
67%

NET LIKELY

-54
-33%

-62
-38%

Don't know
LIKELY

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 89

Q.21.1. And how interested, if at all, do you think you would be in doing the following in 5 year's time?
Living in Canterbury
Base : All students

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
local area

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
student/ postgrad
(f)

Uni of
Canterbury
Christchurch
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

Oppose
(m)

41*

45*

15**

33*

11
17%

7
17%

9
20%

5
33%

9
27%

22
17%

1
25%

32
21%

23
19%

4
22%

20
19%

6
29%

Fairly interested

75
45%

43
43%

32
49%

31
48%

20
49%

20
44%

4
27%

15
45%

59
46%

1
25%

71
46%

3
50%

59
50%

8
44%

52
50%

8
38%

Not very interested

23

10
10%

13
20%

7
11%

6
15%

6
13%

4
27%

5
15%

16
13%

2
50%

23
15%

11
9%

4
22%

11
11%

4
19%

23
23%

9
14%

13
20%

7
17%

10
22%

2
13%

3
9%

29
23%

28
18%

3
50%

24
20%

2
11%

19
18%

3
14%

2
2%

1
2%

2
3%

1
2%

1
3%

2
2%

2
1%

1
1%

2
2%

107
65%

65
65%

42
65%

42
66%

27
66%

29
64%

9
60%

24
73%

81
63%

2
50%

103
66%

3
50%

82
69%z

12
67%

72
69%

14
67%

NOT INTERESTED

55
33%

33
33%

22
34%

20
31%

13
32%

16
36%

6
40%

8
24%

45
35%

2
50%

51
33%

3
50%

35
30%

6
33%

30
29%

7
33%

NET INTERESTED

52
32%

32
32%

20
31%

22
34%

14
34%

13
29%

3
20%

16

36
28%

0
0%

47

6
33%

42

7
33%

Don't know

3
2%j

INTERESTED

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

48%zh

52
33%z

0
0%

40%z

18**

104

Oppose
(o)

64*

19%j

118

Support
(n)

10
15%

32

6**

Support
(l)

65*

Not at all interested

156

Dissatisfied
(k)

22
22%

14%l

4**

Satisfied
(j)

Support for building in


district

32
19%

165

128

Other uni
(i)

Support for building in area

Very interested

Total

100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study

40%z

21**

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 90

Q.21.1. And how interested, if at all, do you think you would be in doing the following in 5 year's time?
Living in Canterbury
Base : All students

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

165

62*

50*

40*

74*

53*

66*

34*

17**

32*

87*

21**

32*

85*

23**

21**

32
19%J

13
21%

12
24%

11
28%

12
16%

13
25%

10
15%

7
21%

4
24%

8
25%

11
13%

6
29%

10
31%

16
19%

2
9%

3
14%

75
45%

27
44%

21
42%

15
38%

37
50%

22
42%

37
56%z

13
38%

5
29%

15
47%

45
52%

8
38%

12
38%

43
51%

10
43%

8
38%

Not very interested

23
14%

8
13%

6
12%

4
10%

10
14%

9
17%

7
11%

5
15%

5
29%

4
13%

11
13%

1
5%

5
16%

9
11%

4
17%

5
24%

Not at all interested

32
19%

13
21%

10
20%

9
23%

13
18%

7
13%

12
18%

8
24%

1
6%

5
16%

19
22%

6
29%

3
9%

17
20%

7
30%

5
24%

3
2%

1
2%

1
2%

1
3%

2
3%

2
4%

1
3%

2
12%

1
1%

107
65%

40
65%

33
66%

26
65%

49
66%

35
66%

47
71%

20
59%

9
53%

23
72%

56
64%

14
67%

22
69%

59
69%

12
52%

11
52%

NOT INTERESTED

55
33%

21
34%

16
32%

13
33%

23
31%

16
30%

19
29%

13
38%

6
35%

9
28%

30
34%

7
33%

8
25%

26
31%

11
48%

10
48%

NET INTERESTED

52
32%

19
31%

17
34%

13
33%

26
35%

19
36%

28

7
21%

3
18%

14
44%

26
30%

7
33%

14
44%

33

1
4%

1
5%

Total
Very interested
Fairly interested

Don't know
INTERESTED

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

42%zG

6%M

39%z

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 91

Q.21.2. And how interested, if at all, do you think you would be in doing the following in 5 year's time?
Working in a full/part-time job in Canterbury
Base : All students

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
student/ postgrad
(f)

Uni of
Canterbury
Christchurch
(g)

65*

64*

41*

45*

15**

33*

8
13%

7
17%

8
18%

6
40%

11

18%h

10
15%

Fairly interested

63
38%

34
34%

29
45%

27
42%

16
39%

16
36%

Not very interested

32
19%

15
15%

17
26%

12
19%

6
15%

Not at all interested

37

29

22%bj

29%zb

8
12%

14
22%

3
3%

1
2%

53
53%
44
44%

Very interested

Don't know

165
29

4
2%l

INTERESTED

92
56%h

NOT INTERESTED

69
42%g

NET INTERESTED

23
14%ah

9
9%

Satisfaction with
local area

University affiliation

19
19%

Total

100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study

Uni of Kent
(h)
128

Other uni
(i)
4**

Satisfied
(j)
156

Dissatisfied
(k)
6**

Support for building in area


Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

118

Support for building in


district
Support
(n)

18**

104

Oppose
(o)
21**

33%zh

18
14%

29
19%

20
17%

4
22%

17
16%

8
38%

4
27%

13
39%

48
38%

2
50%

60
38%

2
33%

47
40%

7
39%

41
39%

5
24%

11
24%

3
20%

4
12%

26
20%

2
50%

32
21%

22
19%

2
11%

20
19%

3
14%

11
27%

10
22%

2
13%

4
12%

33
26%

32
21%

4
67%

28
24%

4
22%

24
23%

4
19%

3
5%

1
2%

1
3%

3
2%

3
2%

1
1%

1
6%

2
2%

1
5%

39
60%

35
55%

23
56%

24
53%

10
67%

24

66
52%

2
50%

89
57%

2
33%

67
57%

11
61%

58
56%

13
62%

25
38%

26
41%

17
41%

21
47%

5
33%

8
24%

59

2
50%

64
41%

4
67%

50
42%

6
33%

44
42%

7
33%

14

9
14%

6
15%

3
7%

5
33%

16

-2
-33%

17
14%

5
28%

14
13%

6
29%

22%za

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

73%zh

48%zh

46%zg

7
5%

0
0%

25
16%z

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 92

Q.21.2. And how interested, if at all, do you think you would be in doing the following in 5 year's time?
Working in a full/part-time job in Canterbury
Base : All students

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

165

62*

50*

40*

74*

53*

66*

34*

17**

32*

87*

21**

32*

85*

23**

21**

29
18%J

10
16%

13
26%

6
15%

15
20%

10
19%

12
18%

7
21%

4
24%

8
25%

10
11%

6
29%

9
28%

14
16%

3
13%

3
14%

63
38%

24
39%

16
32%

15
38%

28
38%

21
40%

29
44%

10
29%

3
18%

10
31%

41
47%z

5
24%

11
34%

37
44%

6
26%

6
29%

Not very interested

32
19%

12
19%

9
18%

7
18%

16
22%

10
19%

12
18%

6
18%

5
29%

7
22%

16
18%

3
14%

4
13%

15
18%

6
26%

7
33%

Not at all interested

37
22%

14
23%

11
22%

11
28%

13
18%

10
19%

13
20%

9
26%

2
12%

7
22%

19
22%

7
33%

5
16%

19
22%

8
35%

5
24%

4
2%

2
3%

1
2%

1
3%

2
3%

2
4%

2
6%

3
18%

1
1%

INTERESTED

92
56%

34
55%

29
58%

21
53%

43
58%

31
58%

41
62%

17
50%

7
41%

18
56%

51
59%

11
52%

20
63%

51
60%

9
39%

9
43%

NOT INTERESTED

69
42%

26
42%

20
40%

18
45%

29
39%

20
38%

25
38%

15
44%

7
41%

14
44%

35
40%

10
48%

9
28%

34
40%

14
61%

12
57%

NET INTERESTED

23
14%

8
13%

9
18%

3
8%

14
19%

11
21%

16

2
6%

0
0%

4
13%

16
18%

1
5%

11

17

34%z

20%z

-5
-22%

-3
-14%

Total
Very interested
Fairly interested

Don't know

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

24%zG

9%zM

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 93

Q.21. Summary Table. And how interested, if at all, do you think you would be in doing the following in 5 year's time?
Base : All students

1. Living in
Canterbury
Total

165

2. Working in a
full/part-time
job in
Canterbury
165

Very interested

32
19%

29
18%

Fairly interested

75
45%

63
38%

Not very interested

23
14%

32
19%

Not at all interested

32
19%

37
22%

3
2%

4
2%

107
65%

92
56%

NOT INTERESTED

55
33%

69
42%

NET INTERESTED

52
32%

23
14%

Don't know
INTERESTED

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 94

Q.1. Gender
Base : All Respondents not students living in university accommodation

Student residence
Off campus
(b)

Year of study
1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

Total

65*

-**

65*

9**

25**

26**

5**

23**

38*

Male

30
46%

30
46%

6
67%

13
52%

10
38%

1
20%

9
39%

18
47%

Female

35
54%

35
54%

3
33%

12
48%

16
62%

4
80%

14
61%

20
53%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation
Uni of Kent
(h)

Satisfied
(j)

Dissatisfied
(k)

4**

62*

3**

47*

4**

40*

2**

3
75%

28
45%

2
67%

22
47%

2
50%

21
53%

1
50%

1
25%

34
55%

1
33%

25
53%

2
50%

19
48%

1
50%

Other uni
(i)

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

Oppose
(o)

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 95

Q.1. Gender
Base : All Respondents not students living in university accommodation

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Disagree
(B)

Enough employment opportunities


Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

Total

65*

21**

28**

14**

36*

22**

28**

9**

5**

11**

40*

5**

8**

35*

9**

9**

Male

30
46%

12
57%

12
43%

8
57%

15
42%

11
50%

13
46%

1
11%

3
60%

5
45%

19
48%

2
40%

4
50%

16
46%

5
56%

3
33%

Female

35
54%

9
43%

16
57%

6
43%

21
58%

11
50%

15
54%

8
89%

2
40%

6
55%

21
53%

3
60%

4
50%

19
54%

4
44%

6
67%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 96

Q.2. Working status


Base : All Respondents not students living in university campus

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

65*

-**

Off campus
(b)

Year of study
1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

Other uni
(i)

Satisfied
(j)

Dissatisfied
(k)

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

Oppose
(o)

65*

9**

25**

26**

5**

23**

38*

4**

62*

3**

47*

4**

40*

2**

Working - full time (30+


hrs)

Working - part-time (929 hrs)

Unemployed - seeking
work

Unemployed - not seeking


work

Not working (retired)

Student at university

65
100%

65
100%

9
100%

25
100%

26
100%

5
100%

23
100%

38
100%

4
100%

62
100%

3
100%

47
100%

4
100%

40
100%

2
100%

Student at college

Other (specify)

Don't know

Total

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 97

Q.2. Working status


Base : All Respondents not students living in university campus

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development

Option selection

More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

65*

21**

28**

14**

36*

22**

28**

9**

5**

11**

40*

5**

8**

35*

9**

9**

Working - part-time (929 hrs)

Unemployed - seeking
work

Unemployed - not seeking


work

Not working (retired)

Student at university

65
100%

21
100%

28
100%

14
100%

36
100%

22
100%

28
100%

9
100%

5
100%

11
100%

40
100%

5
100%

8
100%

35
100%

9
100%

9
100%

Student at college

Other (specify)

Don't know

Total
Working - full time (30+
hrs)

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 98

Q.3. Age
Base : All Respondents not students living in university campus

Student residence
Off campus
(b)

Year of study

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation
Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

Satisfied
(j)

Dissatisfied
(k)

4**

62*

3**

47*

3
75%

58
94%

2
67%

43
91%

4
100%

38
95%

2
100%

2
5%

1
25%

3
5%

3
6%

2
5%

1
4%

1
3%

1
2%

1
33%

1
2%

Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

3rd/ final year


(e)

Total

65*

-**

65*

9**

25**

26**

5**

23**

38*

16-24

60
92%

60
92%

8
89%

25
100%

23
88%

4
80%

22
96%

35
92%

25-34

3
5%

3
5%

1
11%

1
4%

1
20%

35-44

2
3%j

2
3%

2
8%

45-54

55-59

60-64

65-69

70+

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

Uni of Kent
(h)

Other uni
(i)

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

4**

40*

Oppose
(o)
2**

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 99

Q.3. Age
Base : All Respondents not students living in university campus

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

Total

65*

21**

28**

14**

36*

22**

28**

9**

5**

11**

40*

5**

8**

35*

9**

9**

16-24

60
92%

20
95%

25
89%

13
93%

32
89%

19
86%

28
100%

9
100%

5
100%

10
91%

37
93%

5
100%

7
88%

34
97%

8
89%

8
89%

25-34

3
5%

1
5%

2
7%

1
7%

2
6%

1
5%

1
9%

1
3%

1
13%

1
3%

35-44

2
3%

1
4%

2
6%

2
9%

2
5%

1
11%

1
11%

45-54

55-59

60-64

65-69

70+

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 102

QS1. Can I just check which university year you are in?
Base : All students living in university accommodation

Student residence
Total
(z)
Total
1st year

100
55
55%h

2nd year

16
16%cj

3rd/ final year

19
19%c

Other year/ medical


student/ postgraduate

10
10%c

On campus
(a)
100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study
1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
student/ postgrad
(f)

Uni of
Canterbury
Christchurch
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

Other uni
(i)

Satisfied
(j)

Dissatisfied
(k)

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

Oppose
(o)

-**

55*

16**

19**

10**

10**

90*

-**

94*

3**

71*

14**

64*

19**

55
55%

55
100%z

9
90%

46
51%

54
57%

39
55%

5
36%

35
55%

7
37%

16
16%

16
100%

16
18%

12
13%

2
67%

12
17%

4
29%

11
17%

4
21%

19
19%

19
100%

19
21%

19
20%

12
17%

4
29%

10
16%

6
32%

10
10%

10
100%

1
10%

9
10%

9
10%

1
33%

8
11%

1
7%

8
13%

2
11%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 103

QS1. Can I just check which university year you are in?
Base : All students living in university accommodation

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Disagree
(B)

Enough employment opportunities


Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

100

41*

22**

26**

38*

31*

38*

25**

12**

21**

47*

16**

24**

50*

14**

12**

1st year

55
55%D

26
63%

6
27%

16
62%

15
39%

14
45%

25
66%

13
52%

8
67%

12
57%

26
55%

9
56%

13
54%

27
54%

8
57%

7
58%

2nd year

16
16%

6
15%

4
18%

5
19%

9
24%

8
26%

4
11%

3
12%

1
8%

6
29%

6
13%

2
13%

5
21%

7
14%

3
21%

1
8%

3rd/ final year

19
19%

7
17%

8
36%

4
15%

10
26%

5
16%

6
16%

7
28%

2
17%

1
5%

10
21%

3
19%

5
21%

11
22%

1
7%

2
17%

Other year/ medical


student/ postgraduate

10
10%

2
5%

4
18%

1
4%

4
11%

4
13%

3
8%

2
8%

1
8%

2
10%

5
11%

2
13%

1
4%

5
10%

2
14%

2
17%

Total

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 104

Q.22b. Can I just check which university are you studying at?
Base : All university students

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

Off campus
(b)

Year of study
1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
student/ postgrad
(f)

Uni of
Canterbury
Christchurch
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

Other uni
(i)

Satisfied
(j)

Dissatisfied
(k)

Support
(n)

165

100

65*

64*

41*

45*

15**

33*

128

4**

156

128

90

38
58%

49
77%

33
80%

35
78%

11
73%

128

121
78%

5
83%

93
79%

17
94%

80
77%

20
95%

14
22%

7
17%

9
20%

3
20%

33

31
20%

1
17%

22
19%

1
6%

21
20%

1
5%

1
2%

1
2%

1
2%

1
7%

4
100%

4
3%

3
3%

Canterbury Christ Church


University
Other (specify)

33

10
10%

23

20%ah

4
2%

35%za
6%za

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

100%zh

100%zg

18**

104

Oppose
(o)

University of Kent

90%zb

118

Oppose
(m)

Total

78%bg

6**

Support
(l)

3
3%

21**

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 105

Q.22b. Can I just check which university are you studying at?
Base : All university students

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

Total

165

62*

50*

40*

74*

53*

66*

34*

17**

32*

87*

21**

32*

85*

23**

21**

University of Kent

128
78%

52
84%

34
68%

32
80%

57
77%

38
72%

54
82%

25
74%

12
71%

27
84%

69
79%

14
67%

27
84%

67
79%

17
74%

14
67%

33
20%

10
16%

13
26%

8
20%

14
19%

13
25%

12
18%

8
24%

4
24%

4
13%

17
20%

7
33%

3
9%

17
20%

5
22%

7
33%

4
2%

3
6%

3
4%

2
4%

1
3%

1
6%

1
3%

1
1%

2
6%

1
1%

1
4%

Canterbury Christ Church


University
Other (specify)

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 106

QS1/Q22c. Can I just check which university year you are in?
Base : All students

Student residence
Total
(z)
Total
1st year
2nd year

On campus
(a)

2nd year
(d)

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
student/ postgrad
(f)

Uni of
Canterbury
Christchurch
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

41*

45*

15**

33*

39%bde

55%zb

14
42%

49
38%

1
25%

62
40%

1
17%

47
40%

5
28%

42
40%

7
33%

41

16
16%

25

41

7
21%

33
26%

1
25%

36
23%

3
50%

30
25%

7
39%

26
25%

5
24%

19
19%

26

45

9
27%

35
27%

1
25%

44
28%

1
17%

31
26%

5
28%

26
25%

7
33%

15
100%

3
9%

11
9%

1
25%

14
9%

1
17%

10
8%

1
6%

10
10%

2
10%

15
9%cde

10
10%

5
8%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

100%zcd

104

Oppose
(o)

64

40%za

18**

Support
(n)

64*

45

118

Oppose
(m)

9
14%

100%zce

6**

Support
(l)

65*

156

Dissatisfied
(k)

55

38%za

4**

Satisfied
(j)

100

100%zde

128

Other uni
(i)

64

27%acd

Other year/medical
student/postgraduate

1st year
(c)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

165

25%acej

3rd/final year

Off campus
(b)

Year of study

21**

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 107

QS1/Q22c. Can I just check which university year you are in?
Base : All students

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

165

62*

50*

40*

74*

53*

66*

34*

17**

32*

87*

21**

32*

85*

23**

21**

1st year

64

28

19

39%BD

45%B

11
22%

48%D

19
26%

18
34%

28
42%

13
38%

10
59%

12
38%

31
36%

10
48%

13
41%

33
39%

8
35%

8
38%

2nd year

41
25%

14
23%

15
30%

9
23%

23
31%

18
34%

14
21%

6
18%

3
18%

9
28%

25
29%

3
14%

7
22%

22
26%

7
30%

4
19%

3rd/final year

45
27%

18
29%

17
34%

11
28%

24
32%

12
23%

19
29%

11
32%

3
18%

5
16%

25
29%

6
29%

8
25%

24
28%

6
26%

6
29%

Other year/medical
student/postgraduate

15

1
3%

8
11%

5
9%

5
8%

4
12%

1
6%

6
19%

6
7%

2
10%

4
13%

6
7%

2
9%

3
14%

Total

9%A

2
3%

14%A

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 108

Q.22d. Have you lived off campus at any time during your studies?
Base : All non-first year university students living on campus

Student residence
Total
(z)
Total
No

45*
4
9%h

On campus
(a)
45*

Off campus
(b)

Year of study
1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)
44*

Other uni
(i)

Satisfied
(j)

Dissatisfied
(k)

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

Oppose
(o)

-**

-**

16**

19**

10**

1**

-**

40*

3**

32*

9**

29**

12**

4
9%

2
13%

2
20%

1
100%

3
7%

4
10%

4
13%

3
10%

Yes, in a shared student


house

22
49%

22
49%

8
50%

11
58%

3
30%

22
50%

19
48%

1
33%

18
56%

3
33%

18
62%

3
25%

Yes, with family/friends

4
9%

4
9%

1
6%

1
5%

2
20%

4
9%

3
8%

1
33%

3
9%

3
10%

5
11%

1
6%

1
5%

3
30%

5
11%

5
13%

1
3%

3
33%

1
3%

4
33%

10
22%

10
22%

4
25%

6
32%

10
23%

9
23%

1
33%

6
19%

3
33%

4
14%

5
42%

Yes, in my own home

5
11%l

Other (specify)
Not stated

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 109

Q.22d. Have you lived off campus at any time during your studies?
Base : All non-first year university students living on campus

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

15**

16**

17**

13**

12**

4**

9**

21**

7**

11**

23**

6**

5**

2
13%

1
6%

1
4%

2
15%

1
8%

3
33%

1
14%

2
9%

1
17%

1
20%

Yes, in a shared student


house

22
49%

6
40%

8
50%

7
70%

10
43%

10
59%

7
54%

3
25%

2
50%

3
33%

15
71%

2
29%

5
45%

13
57%

2
33%

2
40%

Yes, with family/friends

4
9%

1
7%

2
13%

1
10%

2
9%

3
18%

1
8%

3
14%

1
14%

3
13%

1
17%

5
11%

1
7%

2
13%

5
22%

2
12%

3
25%

1
25%

1
11%

1
5%

2
18%

2
9%

1
17%

No

Yes, in my own home


Other (specify)
Not stated

45*

23**

The same
(F)

4
9%

Total

10**

Future development
More homes
(E)

10
22%

5
33%

3
19%

2
20%

5
22%

2
12%

3
23%

5
42%

1
25%

2
22%

2
10%

3
43%

4
36%

3
13%

1
17%

2
40%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 110

Q.23. Social grade


Base : All Respondents not students living in university campus

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

65*

-**

Off campus
(b)

Year of study
1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

Other uni
(i)

Satisfied
(j)

Dissatisfied
(k)

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

Oppose
(o)

65*

9**

25**

26**

5**

23**

38*

4**

62*

3**

47*

4**

40*

2**

3
5%

3
5%

3
60%

1
4%

1
3%

1
25%

3
5%

1
2%

1
3%

C1

59
91%

59
91%

9
100%

24
96%

24
92%

2
40%

22
96%

34
89%

3
75%

56
90%

3
100%

44
94%

3
75%

37
93%

2
100%

C2

2
3%

2
3%

2
8%

2
5%

2
3%

2
4%

2
5%

1
2%

1
2%

1
4%

1
3%

1
2%

1
25%

ABC1

62
95%

62
95%

9
100%

24
96%

24
92%

5
100%

23
100%

35
92%

4
100%

59
95%

3
100%

45
96%

3
75%

38
95%

2
100%

C2DE

3
5%

3
5%

1
4%

2
8%

3
8%

3
5%

2
4%

1
25%

2
5%

Total

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 111

Q.23. Social grade


Base : All Respondents not students living in university campus

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

65*

21**

28**

14**

36*

22**

28**

9**

5**

11**

40*

5**

8**

35*

9**

9**

3
5%

1
4%

2
6%

1
5%

2
7%

2
18%

1
3%

2
25%

1
3%

59
91%

19
90%

26
93%

13
93%

33
92%

21
95%

24
86%

8
89%

4
80%

8
73%

38
95%

5
100%

6
75%

7
78%

9
100%

C2

2
3%

2
10%

1
7%

1
3%

1
4%

1
11%

1
20%

1
3%

2
22%

1
2%

1
4%

1
4%

1
9%

ABC1

62
95%

19
90%

27
96%

13
93%

35
97%

22
100%

26
93%

8
89%

4
80%

10
91%

39
98%

5
100%

8
100%

35
100%

7
78%

9
100%

C2DE

3
5%

2
10%

1
4%

1
7%

1
3%

2
7%

1
11%

1
20%

1
9%

1
3%

2
22%

Total
A
B
C1

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

34
97%z

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 112

Q.24. Which of these best describes the ownership of your home?


Base : All Respondents not students living in university campus

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

65*

-**

Off campus
(b)

1st year
(c)

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

Uni of Kent
(h)

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

Oppose
(o)

25**

26**

5**

23**

3**

47*

4**

40*

2**

2
8%

1
4%

1
20%

2
9%

1
3%

1
25%

4
6%

1
25%

Buying on mortgage

1
2%

1
2%

1
4%

1
25%

1
2%

1
2%

1
3%

Rented from Council

Rented from housing


association

Shared ownership (e.g.


part buying, part
renting)

1
2%

1
2%

1
4%

1
3%

1
2%

1
2%

1
3%

56
86%

56
86%

8
89%

20
80%

24
92%

4
80%

21
91%

34
89%

1
25%

53
85%

3
100%

42
89%

3
75%

35
88%

2
100%

3
5%

3
5%

1
11%

2
8%

2
5%

1
25%

3
5%

3
6%

3
8%

*=Less than 0.5 %


Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

62*

Dissatisfied
(k)

4
6%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

4**

Satisfied
(j)

Other (specify)

38*

Other uni
(i)

4
6%

Rented from private


landlord

9**

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

Owned outright
(including leasehold)

Total

65*

Year of study

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 113

Q.24. Which of these best describes the ownership of your home?


Base : All Respondents not students living in university campus

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

21**

28**

14**

22**

28**

9**

5**

11**

Owned outright
(including leasehold)

4
6%

4
14%

3
8%

2
9%

1
4%

1
11%

1
20%

2
18%

Buying on mortgage

1
2%

1
3%

1
11%

Rented from Council

Rented from housing


association

Shared ownership (e.g.


part buying, part
renting)

1
2%

1
4%

1
3%

56
86%

20
95%

21
75%

14
100%

30
83%

3
5%

1
5%

2
7%

1
3%

Total

Rented from private


landlord
Other (specify)

65*

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

36*

The same
(F)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

40*

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

5**

8**

35*

9**

9**

1
3%

1
13%

2
22%

1
13%

1
4%

1
9%

1
13%

19
86%

25
89%

7
78%

4
80%

8
73%

36
90%

5
100%

5
63%

32
91%

7
78%

9
100%

1
5%

1
4%

3
8%

3
9%

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 114

Q.25. And which of these best describes your home?


Base : All Respondents not students living in university campus

Student residence
Off campus
(b)

Year of study
1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

Satisfied
(j)

Dissatisfied
(k)

62*

3**

47*

54
87%

2
67%

39
83%

4
100%

33
83%

2
100%

8
13%

1
33%

8
17%

7
18%

Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

Total

65*

-**

65*

9**

25**

26**

5**

23**

38*

House

56
86%

56
86%

6
67%

23
92%

22
85%

5
100%

19
83%

33
87%

4
100%

Flat

9
14%

9
14%

3
33%

2
8%

4
15%

4
17%

5
13%

Bungalow

Maisonette

Other (specify)

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

Uni of Kent
(h)

Other uni
(i)
4**

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

4**

40*

Oppose
(o)
2**

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 115

Q.25. And which of these best describes your home?


Base : All Respondents not students living in university campus

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

Total

65*

21**

28**

14**

36*

22**

28**

9**

5**

11**

40*

5**

8**

35*

9**

9**

House

56
86%

19
90%

22
79%

13
93%

30
83%

18
82%

25
89%

9
100%

5
100%

9
82%

36
90%

3
60%

7
88%

29
83%

9
100%

8
89%

Flat

9
14%

2
10%

6
21%

1
7%

6
17%

4
18%

3
11%

2
18%

4
10%

2
40%

1
13%

6
17%

1
11%

Bungalow

Maisonette

Other (specify)

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 116

Q.26. Are there are any children under the age of 16 living here?
Base : All Respondents not students living in university campus

Student residence
Off campus
(b)

Year of study
1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation
Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

Satisfied
(j)

Dissatisfied
(k)

62*

3**

47*

61
98%z

2
67%

46
98%

4
100%

40
100%

2
100%

1
2%

1
3%

1
33%

1
2%

Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

3rd/ final year


(e)

Total

65*

-**

65*

9**

25**

26**

5**

23**

38*

No, none

63
97%

63
97%

9
100%

25
100%

24
92%

5
100%

22
96%

37
97%

4
100%

Yes, One

1
2%

1
2%

1
4%

1
4%

Yes, Two

1
2%

1
2%

1
4%

Yes, Three

Yes, Four

Yes, Five

Yes, Six or more

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

Uni of Kent
(h)

Other uni
(i)
4**

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

4**

40*

Oppose
(o)
2**

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 117

Q.26. Are there are any children under the age of 16 living here?
Base : All Respondents not students living in university campus

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

Total

65*

21**

28**

14**

36*

22**

28**

9**

5**

11**

40*

5**

8**

35*

9**

9**

No, none

63
97%

21
100%

27
96%

14
100%

34
94%

20
91%

28
100%

9
100%

5
100%

11
100%

38
95%

5
100%

8
100%

35
100%

8
89%

8
89%

Yes, One

1
2%

1
4%

1
3%

1
5%

1
3%

1
11%

Yes, Two

1
2%

1
3%

1
5%

1
3%

1
11%

Yes, Three

Yes, Four

Yes, Five

Yes, Six or more

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 118

Q.27. How many adults aged 16 or over are living here including yourself?
Base : All Respondents not students living in university campus

Student residence
Total
(z)

On campus
(a)

65*

-**

Off campus
(b)

1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

9**

25**

One

1
2%

1
2%

Two

11
17%

11
17%

3
33%

8
12%j

8
12%

Four

27
42%

Five

Total

Three

9%h

Six or more

12
18%

65*

Year of study

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

23**

Other uni
(i)

Satisfied
(j)

Dissatisfied
(k)

62*

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

Oppose
(o)

38*

4**

3**

47*

4**

40*

2**

1
4%

1
2%

1
4%

6
23%

1
20%

3
13%

6
16%

2
50%

11
18%

10
21%

9
23%

1
11%

4
16%

1
4%

2
40%

3
13%

5
13%

6
10%

2
67%

5
11%

1
25%

3
8%

27
42%

4
44%

9
36%

12
46%

2
40%

6
26%

19
50%

2
50%

26
42%

1
33%

19
40%

1
25%

18
45%

1
50%

6
9%

3
12%

3
12%

5
22%

1
3%

6
10%

4
9%

2
5%

12
18%

1
11%

8
32%

3
12%

5
22%

7
18%

12
19%

9
19%

2
50%

8
20%

1
50%

*=Less than 0.5 %


Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

5**

Uni of Kent
(h)

1
4%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

26**

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 119

Q.27. How many adults aged 16 or over are living here including yourself?
Base : All Respondents not students living in university campus

Enough homes
Total
(z)
Total
One
Two

65*
1
2%
11
17%J

Agree
(A)

Disagree
(B)

21**

Enough employment opportunities


Agree
(C)

28**

1
4%

3
14%

7
25%

Disagree
(D)
14**

Future development
More homes
(E)
22**

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

40*

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

28**

9**

5**

11**

5**

8**

35*

9**

1
3%

1
5%

1
3%

1
11%

1
7%

7
19%

3
14%

4
14%

1
11%

1
20%

3
27%

4
10%

1
20%

2
25%

5
14%

1
11%

1
11%

36*

The same
(F)

9**

Three

8
12%

4
14%

4
11%

2
9%

4
14%

2
22%

1
20%

2
18%

5
13%

1
13%

4
11%

2
22%

Four

27
42%

10
48%

9
32%

10
71%

13
36%

8
36%

14
50%

3
33%

3
60%

4
36%

17
43%

2
40%

3
38%

16
46%

4
44%

3
33%

Five

6
9%

3
11%

2
14%

3
8%

4
18%

1
4%

1
11%

1
9%

4
10%

1
13%

4
11%

1
11%

12
18%

8
38%

4
14%

1
7%

8
22%

4
18%

5
18%

2
22%

1
9%

9
23%

2
40%

1
13%

6
17%

3
33%

2
22%

Six or more

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 120

Q.28. And can I just check, are there are any people aged 60 or more living here including yourself?
Base : All Respondents not students living in university campus

Student residence
Off campus
(b)

Year of study
1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

62*

3**

47*

4**

40*

61

2
67%

46
98%

3
75%

40
100%

2
100%

1
33%

1
2%

1
25%

Total

65*

-**

65*

9**

25**

26**

5**

23**

38*

No, none

63
97%

63
97%

9
100%

24
96%

25
96%

5
100%

23
100%

36
95%

4
100%

One

1
2%

1
2%

1
4%

1
3%

Two

1
2%

1
2%

1
4%

1
3%

1
2%

Three

Four or more

*=Less than 0.5 %


Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

Other uni
(i)

Dissatisfied
(k)

On campus
(a)

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

Uni of Kent
(h)

Satisfied
(j)

Total
(z)

4**

98%z

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

Support
(n)

Oppose
(o)
2**

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 121

Q.28. And can I just check, are there are any people aged 60 or more living here including yourself?
Base : All Respondents not students living in university campus

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Housing
(O)

Total

65*

21**

28**

14**

36*

22**

28**

9**

5**

11**

40*

5**

8**

9**

9**

No, none

63
97%

21
100%

27
96%

14
100%

35
97%

21
95%

27
96%

9
100%

5
100%

10
91%

39
98%

5
100%

8
100%

35
100%

9
100%

8
89%

One

1
2%

1
3%

1
5%

1
3%

1
11%

Two

1
2%

1
4%

1
4%

1
9%

Three

Four or more

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

35*

Population
growth
(N)

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 122

Q.29. Are your day-to-day activities limited because of a health problem or disability which has lasted, or is expected to last, at least 12 months?
Base : All Respondents

Student residence
Total
(z)
Total
Yes
No
Refused

On campus
(a)

65*

1st year
(c)
64*

2nd year
(d)

3rd/ final year


(e)

41*

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

45*

15**

1
2%

3
5%

1
2%

2
13%

2
6%

4
3%

158
96%

94
94%

64
98%

60
94%

40
98%

45
100%

13
87%

31
94%

123
96%

1
1%

1
1%

1
2%

*=Less than 0.5 %


Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

33*

Uni of Kent
(h)

5
5%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

6
4%

165

100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study

128

1
1%

Other uni
(i)
4**
4
100%
-

Satisfied
(j)
156
5
3%
150
96%
1
1%

Dissatisfied
(k)
6**
-

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

118
5
4%

Support
(n)

18**

104

Oppose
(o)
21**

5
5%

6
100%

113
96%

18
100%

98
94%

21
100%

1
1%

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 123

Q.29. Are your day-to-day activities limited because of a health problem or disability which has lasted, or is expected to last, at least 12 months?
Base : All Respondents

Enough homes
Total
(z)
Total
Yes
No
Refused

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

74*

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)
87*

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)
21**

32*

85*

Population
growth
(N)
23**

Housing
(O)

34*

17**

3
5%

1
3%

3
3%

2
10%

2
6%

4
5%

48
96%

39
98%

71
96%

53

96%G

58
94%

100%G

63
95%

30
88%

17
100%

31
97%

83
95%

19
90%

29
91%

81
95%

23
100%

21
100%

1
1%

1
1%

1
3%

1
1%

1
3%

9%E

32*

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

*=Less than 0.5 %


Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

66*

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

2
3%

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)

53*

The same
(F)

1
3%

158

40*

Future development
More homes
(E)

2
4%

6
4%

50*

Disagree
(D)

4
6%

165

62*

Agree
(C)

21**

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 124

Q.30. Which of these best describes your ethnic group?


Base : All Respondents

Student residence
Total
(z)
Total

165

On campus
(a)
100

Off campus
(b)

Year of study
1st year
(c)

2nd year
(d)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

3rd/ final year


(e)

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

65*

64*

41*

45*

15**

33*

49

41
64%

25
61%

33
73%

8
53%

27

Uni of Kent
(h)
128

Other uni
(i)

Satisfied
(j)

Dissatisfied
(k)

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

118

Support
(n)

18**

104

Oppose
(o)

4**

156

6**

21**

77
60%

3
75%

104
67%z

1
17%

74
63%

12
67%

66
63%

15
71%

1
25%

2
1%

2
2%

2
2%

19
18%

White
English/ Welsh/
Scottish/ Northern
Irish/ British

107
65%ah

58
58%

75%za

82%zh

Irish

2
1%

1
1%

1
2%

2
3%

1
1%

Gypsy or Irish traveller

25
15%

18
18%

7
11%

10
16%

6
15%

4
9%

5
33%

4
12%

21
16%

23
15%

2
33%

20
17%

Any other White


background (specify)

1
6%

Mixed/ multiple ethnic groups


White and Black
Caribbean

1
1%

1
1%

1
2%

1
1%

1
1%

1
1%

1
1%

White and Black African

White and Asian

1
1%

1
1%

1
2%

1
1%

1
1%

1
6%

1
5%

Any other mixed/


multiple ethnic
background (specify)

2
1%j

1
1%

1
2%

1
2%

1
2%

2
2%

1
1%

1
17%

2
2%

1
1%

Indian

3
2%

3
3%

1
2%

1
2%

1
2%

3
2%

3
2%

2
2%

1
6%

Pakistani

2
1%

1
1%

1
2%

2
5%

2
2%

2
1%

1
1%

1
6%

1
1%

Bangladeshi

Chinese

2
1%

1
1%

1
2%

2
3%

2
2%

2
1%

2
2%

Any other Asian


background (specify)

5
3%

3
3%

2
3%

3
7%c

2
4%

1
3%

4
3%

5
3%

4
3%

1
6%

4
4%

1
5%

African

7
4%

6
6%

1
2%

3
5%

2
5%

1
2%

1
7%

1
3%

6
5%

6
4%

5
4%

5
5%

1
5%

Caribbean

1
1%

1
2%

1
2%

1
1%

1
1%

1
1%

1
1%

Any other Black or Black


British background
(specify)

3
2%

3
3%

2
3%

1
7%

3
2%

3
2%

2
2%

2
2%

Asian or Asian British


2
10%

Black or Black British

Other ethnic group


Arab

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 124

Q.30. Which of these best describes your ethnic group?


Base : All Respondents

Student residence
Total
(z)
Total

1st year
(c)

45*

Uni of Kent
(h)

4**

Satisfied
(j)
156

Dissatisfied
(k)

15**

33*

2%j

3
2%

1
1%

2
33%

1
1%

1
1%

1
2%

1
1%

1
1%

77
77%

57
88%

53
83%

31
76%

37
82%

13
87%

31

99
77%

4
100%

4
3%

94%zh

128

Other uni
(i)

2
4%

81%h

41*

Other/ med
Uni of
student/ post- Canterbury
grad
Christchurch
(f)
(g)

1
2%

134

64*

3rd/ final year


(e)

Refused

65*

2nd year
(d)

1
2%

100

Off campus
(b)

Satisfaction with
Support for building in
local area
Support for building in area
district

University affiliation

2
2%

165

Any other ethnic group


(specify)

WHITE

On campus
(a)

Year of study

6**

Support
(l)

Oppose
(m)

118

Support
(n)

18**

104

Oppose
(o)
21**

2
2%

1
6%

1
1%

1
5%

1
1%

83%z

3
50%

96
81%

13
72%

87
84%

15
71%

3
2%

1
17%

3
3%

1
6%

2
2%

1
5%

129

MIXED/ MULTIPLE ETHNIC


GROUPS

4
2%

3
3%

1
2%

1
2%

1
2%

2
4%

ASIAN OR ASIAN BRITISH

12
7%

8
8%

4
6%

3
5%

6
15%

3
7%

1
3%

11
9%

12
8%

9
8%

3
17%

5
5%

3
14%

BLACK OR BLACK BRITISH

8
5%

6
6%

2
3%

4
6%

2
5%

1
2%

1
7%

1
3%

7
5%

7
4%

6
5%

6
6%

1
5%

OTHER ETHNIC GROUP

5
5%

1
2%

2
3%

1
2%

2
4%

1
7%

6
5%

4
3%

2
33%

4
3%

1
6%

3
3%

1
5%

4%j

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 125

Q.30. Which of these best describes your ethnic group?


Base : All Respondents

Enough homes
Total
(z)

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

165

62*

50*

40*

74*

53*

66*

34*

17**

32*

87*

21**

32*

85*

23**

21**

107
65%

39
63%

32
64%

25
63%

55

32
60%

49
74%z

24
71%

11
65%

21
66%

57
66%

13
62%

20
63%

55
65%

15
65%

14
67%

Irish

2
1%

1
2%

1
2%

1
2%

2
2%

2
2%

Gypsy or Irish traveller

8
13%

8
16%

5
7%

6
11%

9
14%

3
18%

6
19%

14
16%

4
13%

12
14%

3
13%

5
24%

Total

White
English/ Welsh/
Scottish/ Northern
Irish/ British

Any other White


background (specify)

25
15%D

23%D

74%z

3
9%

1
5%

Mixed/ multiple ethnic groups


White and Black
Caribbean

1
1%

1
2%

1
1%

1
1%

White and Black African

White and Asian

1
1%

1
3%

1
2%

1
6%

1
1%

Any other mixed/


multiple ethnic
background (specify)

2
1%

2
4%

2
3%

1
2%

2
2%

2
2%

3
2%

3
5%

1
3%

1
2%

2
6%

1
6%

1
3%

2
6%M

1
4%

Pakistani

2
1%

1
2%

2
3%

1
2%

1
2%

1
3%

1
1%

1
1%

1
5%

Bangladeshi

Chinese

2
1%

1
2%

1
2%

1
3%

1
2%

1
2%

1
3%

1
1%

2
2%

5
3%

3
5%

1
2%

2
5%

1
1%

2
4%

2
6%

1
3%

2
2%

2
10%

2
6%

1
1%

2
9%

African

7
4%

2
3%

4
8%

4
5%

3
6%

3
5%

1
3%

1
6%

1
3%

3
3%

2
10%

2
6%

4
5%

1
4%

Caribbean

1
1%

1
1%

1
2%

1
1%

1
1%

Any other Black or Black


British background
(specify)

3
2%

2
3%

1
2%

1
3%

1
1%

3
6%z

1
1%

2
10%

2
2%

1
4%

3
2%

2
3%

2
3%

2
4%

1
3%

1
1%

1
5%

1
3%

1
1%

1
5%

Asian or Asian British


Indian

Any other Asian


background (specify)

Black or Black British

Other ethnic group


Arab
Any other ethnic group
(specify)

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Canterbury Future Development


(FINAL - Students only)
Table 125

Q.30. Which of these best describes your ethnic group?


Base : All Respondents

Enough homes
Total
(z)
Total
Refused

165
1
1%

Agree
(A)

Enough employment opportunities

Disagree
(B)

Agree
(C)

Disagree
(D)

Future development
More homes
(E)

74*

The same
(F)

Option selection

Less homes
(G)
34*

A
(H)

B
(I)

C
(J)

Key factors for option choice


D
(K)

87*

Greenfield Job growth


(L)
(M)
21**

32*

Population
growth
(N)

Housing
(O)

62*

50*

40*

53*

66*

17**

32*

85*

23**

1
1%

1
3%

1
1%

1
3%

21**
-

41
82%

34
85%

60
81%

38
72%

59

14
82%

27
84%

73
84%

14
67%

24
75%

69
81%

18
78%

19
90%
-

81%E

48
77%

89%zE

27
79%

MIXED/ MULTIPLE ETHNIC


GROUPS

4
2%

2
4%

1
3%

2
3%

2
4%

1
2%

1
6%

3
3%

4
5%

ASIAN OR ASIAN BRITISH

12
7%

8
13%z

2
4%

4
10%

3
4%

4
8%

3
5%

4
12%

1
6%

4
13%

4
5%

2
10%

4
13%

4
5%

3
13%

BLACK OR BLACK BRITISH

8
5%

2
3%

4
8%

5
7%

4
8%

3
5%

1
3%

1
6%

1
3%

4
5%

2
10%

2
6%

5
6%

1
4%

OTHER ETHNIC GROUP

6
4%

4
6%

1
2%

1
3%

3
4%

1
3%

2
2%

3
14%

1
3%

3
4%

1
4%

1
5%

WHITE

134

Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012


Respondent Type : Canterbury District residents
Source : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)
*=Less than 0.5 %
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O
* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

9%zF

1
5%

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi