Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
AB
TEKNILLINEN KORKEAKOULU TEKNISKA HGSKOLAN HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITT HELSINKI UNIVERSITE DE TECHNOLOGIE DHELSINKI
List of Contents
page 1...Welded connection of tension member ........................................................................... 2...Welds of a fin plate connection ........................................................................................ 3...Welded truss connection ................................................................................................. 4...Welded connection of T cantilever ................................................................................... 5...Bolted connection of tension member ............................................................................. 6...Bolted truss connection .................................................................................................... 7...Bolted slip resistant connection ....................................................................................... 8...Bolted long connection ..................................................................................................... 9...Bolted connection with packing ....................................................................................... 10..Single lap connection with one bolt ................................................................................. 11..Bolted beam splices ......................................................................................................... 12..Beam-to-column welded joint .......................................................................................... 13..Pin connection ................................................................................................................. 14..Simple column base ......................................................................................................... 15..Fixed column base ........................................................................................................... 16..Fin plate connection ......................................................................................................... 17..Header plate connection .................................................................................................. 18..Bolted extended end plate connestion ............................................................................. 19..Extended end plate semirigid joint ................................................................................... 3 4 6 8 10 11 13 14 15 17 18 18 21 25 27 30 32 34 34
170
The structural welds should be (i) longer than 40 mm, and (ii) longer than 6 aw = 6 3 = 18 mm. Both of these are satisfied. The full length of the weld can be taken into account in the strength calculation, because 150 aw = 50 3 = 450 mm > 170 mm . Longitudinal welds In the longitudinal welds is = = 0 . Based on the fillet welds resistance fu f 2 2 2 + 3 + // and u
aw
_ I
II _ I
w M 2
M2
1,4 aw
Fig. 1.2 fu .
II
FSd
II .Rd =
3 w M 2
II
LwII
awII
Fig. 1.3
( II .Rd = 0 and = =
w
2
2
) rewritten:
Lw aw
FSd
w w fu . + 3 w M2 2 2
Fig. 1.4
w .Rd =
fu
w M 2 2
3 80 = 74,7 103 N
Note: 1) The weld resistance may conservatively be checked independent of the loading direction as follows: Fw .Rd = fu aw Lw = 550 3 ( 2 170 + 80 ) 1,0 1,25 3 = 320,0 10 3 N < FSd = 330 kN . The welds are not satisfactory uder this model. 2) The tension resistance of a member is Nu .Rd = A fy = 80 10 460 = 334,5 103 N > 330 kN . 1,10 The tension resistance is satisfactory.
w M 2
M0
Check the resistance of the fillet-welded connection of the fin plate, shown in Fig. 5.2.1. The connection is subject to the vertical factored force VSd = 250 kN, acting at an eccentricity e = 60 mm. The steel is Grade S235, and the material partial safety factors are M 0 = 1,15 and M 2 = 1,50 .
4 L = 300 e = 60 tp =15
Fig. 2.1 Drawing of the connection The structural welds should be (i) longer than 40 mm, and (ii) longer than 6 au = 6 4 = 24 mm. Both of these are satisfied. The full length of the weld can be taken into account in the strength calculation, because 150 aw = 50 4 = 600 mm > 300 mm . The shear stress perpendicular to the weld cross-section is
II =
The maximum normal stress parallel to the weld cross-section, based on an elastic distribution of bending stresses is
w =
which may be decomposed (see Fig. 5.2.2) into the shear across the critical plane (the weld throat) and the normal stress perpendicular to this plane:
= =
w
w
2
125 2
= 88,4 MPa .
V Sd 104,2 88,4 88,4
II
II
_
I
_ I
Fig. 2.2
Check of the weld design resistance:
w Mw
fu
and
fu
M2
P 15 - 90 x 300
Steel S235 J2
and in bending:
Mc .Rd = Wel fy / M 0 = 15 300 2 235 / 1,15 6
= 46,0 10 6 Nmm > M Sd = 250 10 3 60 = 15 10 6 Nmm . The interaction of bending and shear need not be checked, because the shear resistance is more than double the shear force acting: 53110 3 / 2 = 266 10 3 N > 250 kN .
3) The elastic distribution of stresses in the welds is used because the above is an elastic check of the fin-plate connection. A plastic check of the welds may be performed, based on the expression VSd e M w = = . W pl .w 2 aw L2
4
The tension member resistance (area of a angle A = 480 mm2) is N pl .Rd = A fy = 2 480 275 = 240,0 103 N . 1,10
M0
Weld at connected leg At the connected flange of the angle may be provided as a fillet weld thicker than 3 mm, and thinner than 3 2 = 4 ,2 < 5 mm . The the force in the weld by the connected leg is
Fw .b =
N pl .Rd e . 2 b
w .b =
Fw .b fu aw .b Lb w M 2
Fig. 3.2
Provide Lb = 50 mm.
ab
Fig. 3.3
Weld at free leg The force in the weld by the free leg
. . //.a
a
Fw .a =
the length may be estimated as L y 2 ,5 Lb a b / a a 150 mm . The shear stress in the weld
II .a
//.b
Fig. 3.4
.a = .a =
M w .a
2 2 aw .a La 6
1,5 10 6 6 2 3 1502
= 94,3 MPa .
fu
w M 2
= 67,7MPa <
M2
The weld strength is satisfactory. The welds are acceptable from the structural point of view: longer than 40 mm and than 6 a = 63 = 18 mm, shorter than 150a = 150 3 = 450mm . (No reduction due to the long weld is needed).
50 25 2 L 50 x 5 - 1 500
150
Fig. 3.5 Design drawing of the connection _________________________________________________________________________________ Note: The gusset plate in tension is N t .Rd = A fy = 100 10 275 = 250 10 3 N > N pl .Rd = 229 ,6 kN , 1,10 which is satisfactory.
M0
P 10 - 350 x 120
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
The effective area of the column flange is calculated based on the effective width:
tw + 2r + 7t f 7 ,1 + 2 15 + 7 10 ,7 112 2 2 = beff = min f t f yf 10 ,7 275 = 117 = 112 mm . tw + 2r + 7 7 ,1 + 2 15 + 7 t p f yp 10 275 The effective width is shorter compare to the width of the column flange, see Fig. 5.16.2
but longer than 0,7 times the width of the column flange beff = 112 > 0 ,7 150 = 105 mm . Hence the column need not to be stiffen in tension and compression.
Fig. 4.2
112
II
5 A 5 A
eff.we
_ _ I I
23,3 e we = 84,2
38,3 31,7
v.we
10
23,8
144,9
ewe
Fig. 4.3 112 5 120 + (112 10 ) 5 110 + 105 5 2 105 / 2 = = 84 ,2 mm , 1070 + 1050
= =
M Sd Ww 2
7 ,5 10 6 35 ,6 10 3 2
= 149 ,0 MPa .
fu
w Mw
Scale: 1 : 10
Fig. 4.4 Design drawing of the connection _________________________________________________________________________________ Note: The resistance of the web-to-flange filled welds may be checked as: The section moment of the area of the connected part (flange) is
S = beff tfb z = 112 10 29,7 = 33,3 103 mm3 .
112
10 3
II .Sd =
The shear resistance of the web-to-flange welds ( = = 0 ): fu 2 2 2 + 3 + II , w Mw fu 430 II .Rd = = = 194 ,7 MPa > II .Sd = 44 ,7 MPa . 3 w Mw 0 ,85 1,50 3 The weld strength is satisfactory.
10
Fv .Sd =
162
4 = 41,6 103 N > 32 500 N .
Fv ,Rd =
0 ,6 fub A
Mb
1,45
= = =
d0 d p1
Fig. 5.3
Mb
M2
11
110 2 L 90 x 6 10 50 70 40 F Sd = 135 kN 15
Shear resistance The design shear resistance per two bolts with two shear plane, if the shear is not passing through threaded part of the bolt, is
Fv ,Rd = 2 n 0 ,6 f ub As = 2 2 0 ,6 800 245 = 324 ,4 10 3 N > 135 kN . 1,45
Mb
Fig. 6.2
Bearing resistance The bolt bearing resistance of the plate: e 40 = 1 = = 0 ,61 (limit) 3 d0 3 22
p 1 70 1 = 1 = = 0 ,81 3 d 0 4 3 22 4 f ub 800 = = 1,86 fu 430 = 1,0
d0
p1 70
e1 40
Fig. 6.3
12
Fb.Rd =
2 ,5 fu d t
Mb
2 ,5 0 ,61 430 20 15 = 135,7 103 N > Fv .Sd = 135 kN . 1,45 The bolts shear resistance is satisfactory.
d e1 50 p1 70
d0
= =
p1 1 70 1 = = 0 ,81 3 d 0 4 3 22 4
f ub 800 = = 1,86 Fig. 6.4 fu 430 = 1,0 2 ,5 fu d t 2 ,5 0 ,76 430 20 2 6 Fb.Rd = = = 135 ,2 10 3 N > Fv .Sd = 135 kN . 1,45 Mb
2 = 0 ,4 +
The resistance at the net section with two bolts in the force direction is
N u .Rd =
M0
M2
10 50 70 40
2 M 20
13
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note: 1) The eccentricity of the fasteners at the end connections and the effects of the spacing and edge distances of the bolts may be taken into account by analyss. The design resistance of the net section is in this case checked directly. 2) The bolt end distances are in the connections often the same (e.g. 50 + 70 + 50). In this case the bearing resistance is checked for both sides of the connection together, e.g. just for the sum of the thinner plates acting in one direction.
Slip resistance The design preloading force (net section of the bolt As = 245 mm2) is
Fp.Cd = 0 ,7 fub As = 0 ,7 1 000 245 = 171,5 10 3 N .
F p.Cd F s.Rd
The slip factor is for surface blasted with shot = 0,5 (Class A surface). There are two slip surfaces, as shown in Fig. 5.6.2. The design slip resistance of one bolt under the ultimate limit state (Connection Category C): ks n 1,0 2 0 ,50 Fs .Rd = Fp ,Cd = 171,5 = 131,9 kN . Ms .ult 1,30
Bearing resistance The bearing resistance is derived for the plate 16 mm:
Fig. 7.2
= = =
bearing Fb.Sd
fub 1 000 = = 2 ,778 , fu 360 = 0 ,508 , 2 ,5 fu d t 2 ,5 0 ,758 360 20 16 Fb.Rd = = = 150,6 10 3 N . 1,45 Mb
Fig. 7.3
14
M2
FRd
55 180 70 55 50 e1 4 x 70 50
FRd
Fig. 8.1
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Lf = 1
,
L j 15 d 200 d
=1
p 1,0 ; p 0 ,75 .
e1 50
Lj 280
e1
Fig. 8.2 The shear resistance of a long connection with ten bolts is
15
Fv .Rd = 10 Lf
0 ,6 fub Ab
16 2
4 = 476 ,5 10 3 N .
Mb
=
for ten bolts is
e1 50 p 1 70 1 f 500 = = 0 ,98 ; = 1 = = 1,12 ; = bu = = 1,39 ; = 1,0 3 d0 3 17 3 d0 4 3 17 4 fu 360 2 ,5 fu d t = 10 2 ,5 0 ,980 360 16 12 = 1354 ,8 10 3 N . 1,25
Fb.Rd = 10
Mb
M2
Notes: 1) The reduction of the resistance starts at the connection length 15 d, see Fig. 8.3 .
Lt
Lj
Lj
Fig. 8.3
2) The design plastic resistance of section is A f y 180 12 235 N pl .Rd = = = 461,5 10 3 N . M0 1,10
16
P5 -170 x 2000
50 70 50 e1 p1 e1
t tp 5 10 10
The reduction factor of the packing is 9d 9 16 = p = = 0 ,911 , p 1,0 8 d + 3 tp 8 16 + 3 10 The shear resistance of four bolt M 16 (each acting in two shear planes) is
0 ,6 800 = 4 2 0 ,911 1,25
16 2
4 = 562 ,7 10 3 N .
Fv .Rd = 4 2 p
0 ,6 f ub A
Mb
f e1 p1 50 1 70 1 500 = = 0 ,98 ; = = = 1,12 ; = ub = = 0 ,980 ; = 1,0 , 3 d0 3 17 3 d 0 4 3 17 4 fu 510 Fb ,Rd = 4 2 ,5 f u d t =4 2 ,5 0 ,980 510 16 10 = 639 ,7 10 3 N . 1,25
Mb
M2
Notes:
1) The reduction of the bolt shear resistance is for packing tp d / 3 shown in Fig. 9.2.
1,0
0,5
0,3 d
1,0 d
1,5 d
Fig. 9.2
17
2) The additional bolt row may be optionally placed in an extension of the packing. see Fig. 9.3.
Fig. 9.3
16 2
4 = 41,6 10 3 N > 40 kN .
Fv ,Rd =
0 ,6 f ub A
Mb
1,45
The design bearing resistance of one bolt for plate 5 mm is calculated for the smallest
=
as
f e1 30 500 = = 0 ,588 (limit); = bu = = 0 ,980 ; = 1,0 3 d0 3 17 fu 510 2 ,5 fu d t = 2 ,5 0 ,588 510 16 5 = 41,4 10 3 N > 40 kN . 1,45
Fb ,Rd =
Mb
Mb
M2
18
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note: The connections with single bolt are used for structural purposes in special cases only, e.g. for the transmission electric towers and less important structures. In this type of connection is the washer positioned under the bolt nut as well as bolt head due to the shear and bending of the bolt.
70 80 70
190
40 3 x 90 IPE 450 40 40 80 40
P 15 - 190 x 300
The internal forces in the connection has to follow the material distribution in the connecting elements. Hence the splices on the beam flanges are designed of the area of the beam flanges and the beam splices on the beam web of the area of the beam web. The splices on the beam flanges from both sides bring the most smooth transfer, see Notes below. The splices for the hot rolled beams till 500 mm are designed with the splices on one side only to economise the solution in the building design. The distribution of internal forces in joint may follow elastic, elastic-plastic or plastic distribution based on the global analysis of the whole structure, of the connected elements and on economy of design. flange web The splices at the flanges carry the forces based on the bending moment (the plastic internal force distribution in the Fw.Sd Nf.Sd V connection) Sd Fw.Sd M Sd 180 Fw.Sd N f .Sd = = = 413 ,4 kN . 0 ,45 0 ,0146 0 ,45 0 ,0146 Fw.Sd Nf.Sd Fig. 11.2
Splices The tension splice cross-section area is affected by holes 22 mm:
Anet = 15 190 2 15 22 = 2 190 mm2 , 0 ,9 Anet fu / M 2 = 0 ,9 2 190 360 / 1,30 = 545 ,8 10 3 N > Nf .Sd = 413 ,4 kN .
19
The shear resistance of the beam web splices is calculated for the whole splice area:
Anet = 2 8 350 = 5 600 mm2 , Av .net = 2 8 ( 350 4 22 ) = 4 192 mm ,
2
175
135 45
fy fu
Av =
Fig. 11.3
Vw .pl .Rd =
M0
20 2
4 = 416 ,0 10 3 N > N f .Sd = 413 ,4 kN .
Fv .Rd = 4 n
0 ,6 f ub A
Mb
1,45
The design bearing resistance per four bolts (the beam flange of thickness tf = 14,6 mm) is
f e1 p 40 1 70 1 800 = = 0 ,61 (limit); = 1 = = 0 ,81 ; = ub = = 2 ,22 ; = 1,0 , 3d 0 3 22 3 d 0 4 3 22 4 fu 360 2 ,5 fu d t =4 2 ,5 0 ,61 360 20 14 ,6 = 442 ,2 10 3 N > N f .Sd = 413 ,4 kN . 1,45 The resistance of the bolts at the flanges is satisfactory.
Fb.Rd = 4
Mb
Bolts at web The bearing resistance of four bolt at the web splices: e 40 = 1 = = 0 ,61 (limit); 3d 0 3 22
= =
p1 = 90 e1 = 40
Fig. 11.4
= 484 ,6 10 3 N > VSd = 280 kN .
1,45 Mb The bearing resistance of the beam web is calculated based on the pitch distance p1 only ( = 1,0): 2 ,5 f u d t 2 ,5 1,0 360 20 9 ,4 Fw .b.Rd = 4 =4 = 466 ,8 10 3 N > VSd = 280 kN . 1,45 Mb The design shear resistance (four bolts M 20, each two shear planes) is
Fp.b.Rd = 4
20
Fv .Rd = 4 n
0 ,6 f ub A
0 ,6 800 = 4 2
20 2
Mb
4 = 832 ,0 10 3 N > VSd = 280 kN . 1,45 The resistance of the bolts at the web is satisfactory
Beam net section The holes at the beam web are not taken into account Av = A 2 b t f + ( t w + 2 r ) t f = 9 880 2 190 14 ,6 + ( 9 ,4 + 2 21 ) 14 ,6 = 5 082 ,4 mm 2 ,
Av .net = Av 4 22 t w = 5 082,4 2 22 9,4 = 4 668,8 mm 2 ,
because
fu The shear resistance of the I section is Av f y 5082 ,4 235 Vf .pl .Rd = = = 599 ,6 10 3 N > VSd = 280 kN . 1,15 3 M0 3 The shear resistance is satisfactory. Av .net = 4 668 ,8 mm 2 > Av fy = 5 082 ,4 235 = 3 317 ,7 mm 2 . 360
The bending resistance is not reduced by the shear force, because V pl .Rd / 2 = 599 ,6 / 2 = 299,3 kN > VSd = 280 kN . The holes in beam flanges and web shall be taken into account: fy M2 A 0 ,9 f .net < , Af fu M 0
190 2 22 235 1,30 = 0 ,69 < = 0 ,74 . 190 360 1,15 The reduced second moment of area (IPE 450, Iy = 337,4106 mm4), the holes are taken into account at the beam web as well as at the both flanges: 4 4 I net = 337 ,4 10 6 22 14 ,6 3 9 ,6 22 3 12 12 450 14 ,6 2 4 ( ) 22 14 ,6 2 135 2 9 ,4 22 2 45 2 9 ,4 22 = 268 ,1 10 6 mm 4 . 2 The bending resistance of the net cross-section is I net f y 268 ,1 10 6 235 M el .Rd = = = 243 ,5 10 6 Nmm > M Sd = 180 kNm . h 450 1,15 M0 2 2 The bending resistance is satisfactory. The joint is satisfactory. 0 ,9
40 70 80 70 40 P 15 - 190 x 300 8 22 M 20
M 20 M 20
100 45 45
21
1/ The distribution of the internal forces in joint may be based on elastic, elastic-plastic or plastic distribution. The plastic distribution is presented. For the elastic distribution is the bending moment transferred by the flange cover plate as well as by the web cover plates. The bolts forces in the flanges are taken the part of the bending moment. This bending moment may be estimated by reducing the bending moments by the second moment of inertia of the flages
1 190 14 ,6 3 + 190 14 ,6 217 ,7 2 ) 2 = 263 ,0 10 6 mm 4 12 divided by the second moment of inertia of the I cross-section I M f .Sd = M Sd f . Iy If = (
14,6 457,4 217,7 420,8 217,7 14,6
The force in flanges is M N f .Sd = f ./Sd . h The cover plates and the bolts on the beam web are transferring the rest of the bending moment M w .Sd = M Sd M f .Sd and the shear force VSd. 2/ The splices on the beam flanges from both sides bring the most smooth transfer but the solution is expensive compare to a single side splices.
50 M
Sd
Fig. 11.6
100 70 70
190
Sd
P 8 - 190 x 340
twc = 9,0
22
Beam web The beam shear resistance is calculated based on the shear effective area:
Avb = Ab 2 b b t fb + (t wb + 2 r b ) t fb = 3 ,34 10 3 2 110 9 ,2 + (5 ,9 + 2 12 ) 8 ,5 = 1 570 mm 2 ,
Av .b f y .wb 3 M0
The beam web weld can be calculated based on the beam shear resistance is
aw = FSd w Mw 3 187 ,7 10 3 0 ,80 1,50 3 = = 2 ,7 mm . 2 ( hb 2 t fb ) f u 2 (220 2 9 ,2 ) 360
The overloading of the welds due to the strain hardening of the steel of the section is taken into account by strengthening of the welds in case of the plastic global analysis:
1,7 2,7 = 4,59 mm aw = 5 mm .
The weld throat width at the beam flange is based on the full beam flange resistance:
af = Fc .fb.Rd w Mw 2 bfb fu 2 = 277 0 ,8 1,5 2 = 5 ,9 mm . 2 110 360
The possible overloading of the welds is taken into account for the plastic global analysis:
1,7 5 ,9 = 10,0 mm .
Column web The joint design resistance is limited (In case of the column with web stiffened in tension and in compression) by the shear resistance of the column web (which is not important for the hot rolled H shapes) and by the resistance of the beam flange:
M Rd = Fc.fb.Rd z = 277 10 3 (220 9 ,2 ) = 58 ,4 10 6 Nmm > VSd = 30 kNm .
23
d = 30 F Sd d3 = 20 t 1 = 10 c =1 t 1 = 10 c =1 t2 = 18
Fig. 13.1 Drawing of the connection _________________________________________________________________________________ _ The pin diameter is chosen d = 30 mm .
Shear resistance The shear resistance for two shear planes 0 ,6 A fup 0 ,6 30 2 510 Fv .Rd = 2 = 2 = 332 ,8 kN > 110 kN = FSd 4 1,30 M2 The pin shear resistance is satisfactory. Bearing resistance The bearing resistance for the minimal yeld strength f y = min (275 ; 355 ) = 275 MPa and for the minimal thickness
t = min (2 t1 ; t 2 ) = min (2 10 ; 18 ) = 18 mm may be checked
Fb.Rd =
1,5 d t fy
M0
1,5 30 18 275 = 193 ,7 kN > 110 kN = FSd 1,15 The pin bearing resistance is satisfactory.
Bending resistance The bending moment resistance 0 ,8 Wel fyp 0 ,8 d 3 fyp 0 ,8 30 3 355 MRd = = = = 654 612 Nmm M0 32 M 0 32 1,15 is higher compare to acting moment F 110 000 (2 10 + 18 + 4 1) MSd = Sd (2 t1 + t 2 + 4 c ) = 8 8 = 577 500 Nmm < 654 612 Nmm = M Rd The pin bending resistance is satisfactory.
t1 c
t2
t1 c
M Sd
Fig. 13.2
24
Plate geometry
30 19
70 30
Fig. 13.3
d4 0 ,67
to be the total with b = 2 d 4 + d 0 = 2 19 + 32 = 70 mm . _________________________________________________________________________________ _ Note: If the pin is intended to be replaceable, the contact bearing stress should satisfy the check at the Serviceability Limit State
h ,Ed = 0 ,591
where
d0 FSd,ser
E FSd ,ser (d 0 d ) d
2
f h ,Ed =
2 ,5 f y
M 6 ,ser
M6,ser
is the pin hole diameter, the design force at serviceability and the partial safety factor for serviceability,
and the bearing of the plate and the pin Fb,Rd ,ser = 0 ,6 d t fy / M 6 ,ser Fb,Sd ,ser , as well as the check in bending M Rd ,ser = 0 ,8 W el fup / M 0 M Sd ,ser .
25
b1 = 850
.
c b c = 200 c tw= 9 c
A rigid plate of effective width c, surrounding the column H-section, replaces the flexible base-plate:
c =t fy 3 f j M0
= 30
t f = 15 c
235 = 52 ,4 mm . 3 22 ,3 1,15
h c =200 c
= 80 449 mm 2 .
The design resistance of the column base is
N Rd = Aeff f j = 80 449 22 ,3 = 1 794 10 3 N .
26
70 HE 200 B P10 - 40 x 40 25 5 60 30 40 170 340 170 P30 - 340 x 340 2 22 170 3 x P10 - 40 x 240 170 340 170 50
340 200
70
550
20 - 950 M20
Scale: 1:10
Fig. 14.3 Design drawing of the column base. The anchor bolts are designed for structural integrity.
Notes: 1) The design resistance of the column is lower than the resistance of the column base: N pl .Rd = A f y / M 0 = 7 808 235 / 1,15 = 1 596 10 3 N < N R d = 1 794 kN , where A is the column cross-sectional area. 2) The joint coefficient is taken as 2/3 provided that the characteristic strength of the grout is not less than 0,2 times the characteristic strength of the concrete foundation, and the grout thickness is less than 0,2 min (a; b) = 0,2 340 = 68 mm. 3) Packing plates (see Fig. 14.3) are used to level the base plate during erection.
27
b t 2 fy 6 m M0
Compressed part
1 600 a= 340 ar = 630 b r = 630
b 1 = 1 340
b= 340
1 600
a 1 = 1 340
Fig. 15.2 For the effective cross section of the foundation block, see Fig. 15.2, is
28
a + 2 a r = 340 + 2 * 630 = 1 600 5 a = 5 340 = 1 700 a1 = min = 1 340 mm , a + h = 340 + 1 000 = 1 340 5 b1 = 5 1600 = 8 000
The effective area of the concrete in compression is calculated based on the force equilibrium:
The rigid plate of effective width c, see Fig. 5.19.3 surrounding the column section, replaces the flexible plate c = 56, 4
c =t fy 3 f j M0
= 30
Fig. 15.3
56,4
200
56,4 beff
Fig. 15.4
F Sd db dc
F2s.Rd
The base plate bending resistance is
Aeff f j
Fig. 15.5
29
M Rd = F2 s .Rd d b + Aeff f j d c =
= 114 10 3 140 + 29 100 21,1 109 ,9 = 83 ,4 10 6 Nmm = 83 ,4 kNm .
The column base transfer under axial force 500 kN the bending moment 83,4 kNm.
Normal force, kN
Sd
Fig. 15.6 The column base resistance for the different base plate thickness
30
For weld
For weld
31
Check the beam-to-beam fin plate connection, shown in Fig. 16.1. The connection is subject to the vertical factored force VSd = 110 kN. The steel is Grade S275. The bolts M 20 are Grade 8.8 in holes 21 mm with the thread in the shear plane. The material partial safety factors are M 0 = 1,10 , M 2 = 1,30 , Mb = 1,25 , and Mw = 1,25 .
R 10 30 e1 40 p 1 60 e1 40 tw 5,6 tp 10 L 140 20 IPE 200 P 10 - 140 x 100 M 20 - 5.6 4 4 VSd = 110 kN
10
50 10
Bolts The design shear resistance of two threaded bolts (each with one shear plane) is
Fvs .Rd =2 n 0 ,6 f ub As 0 ,6 800 245 = 2 1 = 188 ,2 10 3 N . 1,25
e = 60 e 1= 40 p = 60
1
Mb
e1 = 40
The bearing resistance of the fin plate in the vertical direction is calculated for t minimum factor:
Fig. 15.2
=
for two bolts
Fb.Rd = 2
2 ,5 fu d t
Mb
=2
Fillet weld The fillet weld resistance is calculated based on normal stress:
32
VSd
= =
= 129 ,8 MPa
II II
awe
tp
L
e
II =
awe
Fig. 16.3
2 2 2 + 3 + II = 129 ,8 2 + 3 129 ,8 2 + 71,4 2 = 287 ,6 MPa <
fu
w Mw
fu
Mw
Tensile failure occurs along the horizontal limit of the block, and shear plastic yielding occurs along the left vertical limit of the block. For beam end with a shear force acting eccentric relative to the bolt group the design value for block tearing Veff,2,Rd should be determined from
Veff .2.Rd = 0 ,5 fu Ant / M 2 + (1 / 3 ) fy Anv / M 0 = .
50 60 70 50
Fig. 16.4
3 ) 275 5 ,6 ( 50 + 60 2 ,5 21 ) / 1,15 =
= 0 ,5 430 5 ,6 ( 50 0 ,5 21 ) / 1,30 + (1 /
81,0 10 3 N > VSd = 80 kN The block tearing of the beam web is satisfactory.
M0
The net section, see Fig. 5.15.5, of the fin plate is not necessary to be taken into account, because
Av .net / Av > fy / fu ,
10 (140 2 21 ) 275 = 0 ,84 > = 0 ,64 . 10 140 430
33
R 10 M 20 30 40 60 40 P 12 - 140 x 100 2 21 2 21
20
10
50 10
4 4
Scale: 1 : 10
4 2 2 2
2. Supported beam;
34
Derive the resistance of the simple beam-to-beam connection, shown in Fig. 17.1. The steel is Grade S355. The bolt M 20, Grade 5.6, is full threaded bolts in holes 21 mm. The material partial safety factors are M 0 = 1,10 , Mb = 1,25 , and Mw = 1,25 .
45 35 70 140 35 6,2
IPE 240
VSd
4 x M 20 - 4.6 P 10 - 140 x 200
40
2 x 60 200
40
10
10
Vb.pl .Rd =
Av f y 3 M0
= 174 ,8 10 3 N .
140 + 2 x 4 x 2
Fig. 17.2 Bolts resistance The shear resistance in the threaded part of the bolts, four bolts, one shear plane per bolt,
Fv .Rd = 4 n 0 ,6 f ub As
= 4 1
Mb
The bearing resistance of four bolts at the end plate, which has lower resistance compare to the beam web of the same thickness, may be calculated for
as
Mb
w Mw
= 293 ,1 10 3 N .
140
Fig. 17.3
Shear resistance of the end plate The net area is taken into account for calculation the shear resistance of the end plate because
35
Av ,net / Av > f y / f u
10 (140 2 21 ) 355 = 0 ,700 > = 0 ,696 . 10 140 510
140
M0
Fig. 17.4
The connection resistance VSd = min (174,8 kN; 235,2 kN; 315,8 kN; 293,1 kN; 749,5 kN) = Vb.pl.Rd = 174,8 kN. is driven by the shear resistance of the beam web.
36
Check the resistance of the extended end plate beam-to-column joint, shown in Fig. 18.1. The joint is subject to the factored bending moment Msd = 110 kNm and to the factored shear force VSd = 100 kN. The steel is Grade S235. The bolts M 20 Grade 5.6, are not preloaded. The elastic global analysis was applied. The material partial safety factors are M 0 = 1,15 , Mb = 1,45 , and Mw = 1,50 .
t wc e 40 1 e hp
560 35 35 12 425 2 105 14,5
M 20 - 5.6 P 12 - 60 x 60 tpc ds
V M P 30 - 200 x 520 Sd Sd
e 340 3
t wb 9,4
12 120 w1
e 75 4 u
20 w a 40 40 wa
t pc dp
30
P 12 - 116 x 65 t fc
28
bp = 200 b cf = 300
HE 500B
r
i
The forces depends on the distance to the centre of rotation (the elastic internal force distribution):
r 3 F1.Sd 0,0477 F1.Sd = , r1 0,4927 r 2 F1.Sd 0,3877 F1.Sd = . r1 0,4927
F3.Sd =
F2.Sd =
37
M Sd = 2 (
0,0477 2 0,3877 2 F1.Sd + F1.Sd + 0,4927 F1.Sd ) 0,4927 0,4927 0,0477 2 0,3877 2 + + 0,4927 ) 0,4927 0,4927 110 0,4927 = 137,1 kN .
492,7
2F 1
387,7 2 F2 47,7
110 = 2 F1.Sd (
2F 3
2 F1.Sd =
Fig. 18.2
Mb
The design resistance of the top bolt row is calculated based on effective T stub resistance of the column flange, which is thinner compare to the end plate. The T stub geometry is shown in Fig. 5.10.3:
w t 120 14 ,5 m = 1 wc = = 52 ,8 mm , 2 2 m 2 = 35 mm .
e m 40 m2 35 w1 120 t wc 14,5
For
m1 52 ,8 1 = = = 0 ,51 m1 + e 52 ,8 + 50
and
2 =
m2 35 = = 0 ,41 , m1 + e 52 ,8 + 50
point of contact
The effective length of the stiffened T stub is calculated based on the factor = 5,7, see the graph [8]. The effective length of the T stub at the top bolt row
2 52 ,8 331,6 2 m = min = min = 301,0 mm . = min 5 ,7 52 ,8 301,0 m
Fig. 18.3
Leff
The resistance of the top bolt row in case of i) the failure of the column flange is
Fcf .Rd =
4 M pl .Rd m
4 12 ,05 10 6 = 913 ,2 10 3 N , 52 ,8
ii) the failure of the column flange and bolts is (The size of end plate limits the width of the T stub by n = min (e ; 1,25 m) = (40; 1,25 52,8) = 40 mm)
38
0 ,9 f ub As
Mb
=
m+n
2 12 ,05 10 6 + 2 40 76 ,0 = 325 ,3 10 3 N , 52 ,8 + 40
The bolt rupture shows the minimum resistance. The bolt resistance is satisfactory in bending.
Shear resistance of bolted part It is expected, that each bolt row carries the same shear force under the elastic distribution of the internal force. The shear resistance per a bolt in treated part for one shear plane
Fv .Rd = 0 ,6 fub As
=
Mb
Fb.Rd =
2 ,5 fu d t
Mb
1 2
Fig. 18.4
39
The stresses perpendicular to weld cross-section is calculated based on the second moment of area of filled weld cross-section:
Iwe = 1 1 (190 + 2 4 )( 450 + 2 4 )3 (190 + 2 4 9 ,4 2 4 )( 450 2 14 ,6 2 4 )3 12 12 9 ,4 2 ( 450 2 14 ,6 )3 190 14 ,6 3 2 190 14 ,6 (( 450 14 ,6 ) / 2 )2 = 205 ,1 10 6 mm4 , 12 12
.2 = .2 = w .2 / 2 =
M Sd z 2 I we 2
= 79 ,8 MPa .
fu
w Mw
.2 = 79 ,8 MPa <
fu
Mw
.1 = .1 = w .1 / 2 =
M Sd z1 I we 2
= 86 ,8 MPa .
fu
w Mw
.1 = 86 ,8 MPa <
fu
Mw
40
M 16 - 8.8 af = 5 a w= 5
VSd MSd
IPE 220
a) The design resistance of the column web in compression Fc .wc .Rd and in tension Ft .wc .Rd are not influenced the resistance, if the stiffeners have at least same the resistance as the beam flanges. The beam flange is in symmetrical joints symmetrically loaded not loaded activated and need not be checked Vwp.Rd .
Fb1.Rd Fb2.Rd
V wp.Rd Fc.wc.Rd
Fb3.Rd
Fig. 19.2 Internal forces in the joint b) The resistance of a bolt row in the column flange may be calculated for the effective T stub for the distances m1 a m2 according to Fig. 19.3
80 7 2 0,8 12 = 26,9 mm 2 70 12 2 0,8 * 2 * 5 m2 = = 23,3 mm 2 m1 =
e m1 0,8 r
m2 0,8* 2*a w 7 80 12 70
Fig. 19.3
41
1 = 2 =
e m1
0,8 r
= 6,1
For the calculation of the resistance of the effective T stub is necessary to evaluate the length of the effective T stub, which is for the top bolt row
tfc
Leff
Leff
and the resulting effective length are
Leff .1 = min (Leff .cp ; Leff .op ) = min (169,0; 166,8 ) = 166,8 mm
Leff .2 = Leff .op = 166,8 mm he resistance of the flange mc .pl .Rd of the unite length is
m c .pl .Rd =
2 t fc fy
4 M0
0,9 As f ub
Mb
Failure mode 1
= 182,4 * 10 3 N = 182,4 kN
Fcf 1.Rd = 2 Leff .2 m c .pl .Rd + 2 n Bt .Rd
Failure mode 2
= 125,4 * 10 3 N = 125,4 kN
Failure mode 3
The effective length for the second bolt row, under the stiffener, may be calculated as Leff .cp = 2m = 2 * * 26,9 = 169,0 mm Leff .cp = m + p = * 26,9 + 140 = 224,5 mm
Leff .op = m = 6,2 * 26,9 = 166,8 mm
42
Leff .1 = min (Leff .cp ; Leff .op ) = min (169,0; 224,5; 166,8; 164,2) = 164,2 mm Leff .2 = min (Leff .op ) = min (166,8; 164,2) = 164,2 mm
Fcf 2.Rd = 4 Leff .1 m c .pl .Rd m =
Failure mode 1
Failure mode 2
Failure mode 3
c) The resistance of the end plate in tension may be evaluated as for flange based on the T stub model. The model for extended part of the end plate is taking into account the bending round the beam upper flange e e w e x = 40mm L eff ex mx m x = a1 0,8 2 a f = 35 0,8 * 2 * 5 = 29,3 mm n = min (e x ; 1,25m x ) = min (40; 1,25 * 29,3 ) = 36,6 mm 0,8 2 a f The length of effective T stub in the unstiffened end plate for the top bolt row is
tp bp
Fig. 19.4
2 m x 2 * 29,3 184,1 = min m x + w = min 29,3 + 80 = min 172,0 = 152,0 mm 152,0 m + 2e 29,3 + 2 30 x
4m x + 1,25e x 167,2 4 29,3 + 1,25 40 113,6 30 + 2 29,3 + 0,625 40 + + e m , e 2 0 625 x x = min min min = = , b 0 5 , , 70 , 0 0 5 140 0 p 0,5w + 2m + 0,625e , , , 123 , 6 0 5 80 2 29 3 0 625 40 + + x x = 70,0 mm
L eff .cp
Leff .op
43
The design resistance of the plate in bending for unite length m p .pl .Rd may be calculated as
m p .pl .Rd =
2 tp fy
4 M0
Failure mode 1
Fp1.Rd =
Failure mode 2
Failure mode 3
d) The design resistance of the second bolt row of the end plate in tension may be evaluated form the values 80 5,9 2 0,8 * 2 * 4 m1 = = 32,5 mm 2 m 2 = 70 35 9,2 0,8 * 2 * 5 = 20,1 mm
m1 32,5 1 = = = 0,52 m1 + e 32,5 + 30 m2 20,1 2 = = = 0,32 m1 + e 32,5 + 30 = 6,0 n = min (e ; 1,25m ) = min (30; 1,25 * 32,5 ) = 30 mm
Leff e m1
m2 p
e m1
0,8 2 a w
The length of the effective T stub is for the second bolt row L eff .cp = 2 m = 2 32,5 = 204,2 mm ,
Leff .cp = m + p = 32,5 + 140 = 242,1 mm
tp
Fig. 19.5 End plate
For the bolt row are governing the lengths Leff 1 = min (Leff .cp ; Leff .op ) = min (204,2; 242,1; 195,0; 181,3 ) = 181,3 mm ,
L 2.eff 2 = min (Leff .op ) = min (195,0; 181,3 ) = 181,3 mm ,
Failure mode 1
= 164,2 * 10 3 N = 164,2 kN
44
F p 2.Rd =
Failure mode 2
Failure mode 3
M 0 (hb t fb )
W pl f y
f) The design resistance of each bolt row may be calculated as a minimal resistance of bolt row. For top row Ft 1.Rd = min (Fcf 1.Rd ; Fp1.Rd ) = min (125,4; 70,3) = 70,3 kN For middle row Ft 2.Rd = min (Fcf 2.Rd ; Fp 2.Rd ) = min (124,7; 117,6 ) = 117,6 kN The tensile resistance of the third bolt row is not taken into account third row.
70,3 kN Fp1.Rd
F bf.Rd 276,7 kN
70,3 kN Ft1.Rd
Fp2.Rd 117,6 kN
Ft2.Rd
z1=250,4mm
117,6 kN z =180,4 mm 2
Summary of resistances:
Column
End plate
Result
Fig. 19.6 Tension forces The lever arms of the bolt rows to the centum of compressions are
z1 = 220 + 35 9,2 9,2 = 250,4 mm , z 2 = 220 35 = 180,4 mm . 2 2
Fwfb.Rd =
fu af (2 bfb twb )
w Mw
The design bending resistance of the weld connecting the end plate is M wfb.Rd = Fwfb.Rd (hb t fb ) = 237,4 * 10 3 (220 9,2)
= 50,0 * 10 6 Nmm = 50,0 kNm > 38,8 kNm = M j .rd
45
The design bending resistance of the welds is higher compare to the joint resistance.
g) The connection shear resistance may be calculated from the third bolr row shear resistance from the M 16 bolt in shear
Fv .Rd = 0,6f ub Ab = 0,6 800 201 = 66,5 10 3 N = 66,5 kN 1,45
twb
Mb
The bolt bearing resistance for plate 12 mm will be lower for pitch p1 1 1 140 3d 4 3 17 4 0 2,50 f ub 800 = min min min = = 2,22 = 1,00 f 360 1,00 u 1,00 1,00
2,5 f u d t 2,5 1,0 360 16 12 = = 119,2 10 3 N = 119,2 kN 1,45
F p1.Rd
F p2.Rd Fb3.Rd
Fig. 19.8
Fb .Rd =
Mb
For the plastic distribution of internal forces may be expected the welds on web carrying the shear force only. The weld resistance is
Fwbw .Rd = awe Lwe fu = 4 2 (220 2 9,2) 360 0,80 1,50 3
F wbw.Rd Lwe
w Mw 3
= 279,3 10 3 N = 279,3 kN
Fig. 19.9 The connection design shear resistance may be calculated as the minimum of bolts and shear resistance 2Fv .Rd 2 66,6 Fb 3.Rd = min 2Fb .Rd = min 2 119,2 = 2 66,6 = 133,2 kN . F 279,3 wbw .Rd h) The initial stiffness of the connection may be calculated based on the deformation stiffness of the deformable components, the column web, bolts and end plate, see Fig. 19.10. The stiffness of the components in the first bolt row may be calculated from the stiffness coefficient of the component beam flange in bending
1 k4 =
0,85 Leff t fc m
3
= 12,586 mm .
k4 z
k10
k5
c d e
The deformation stiffness coefficient of the bolt row is A 157 k 10 = 1,6 s = 1,6 = 6,978 mm . Lb 12 + 12 + 2 6 The stiffness coefficient of the end plate is
k =
1 5
0,85 Leff t p m3
Lb
Fig. 19.10
46
The resulting stiffness is 1 1 k eff 1 = = = 2,140 mm 1 1 1 1 1 1 + + 1 + + 1 k 10 k 5 12,586 6,978 4,088 k4 For the second bolt row it is for column flange
2 k4 =
0,85 Leff t fc m3
= 12,390 mm ,
End plate
2 k5 =
0,85 Leff t p m3
The lever arm may be estimated in the centre of the bolt rows z = 220 9,2 = 210,8mm or more accurate from equation 2 k eff .i z i 2,140 250,4 2 + 2,833 180,4 2 i z= = = 216,2 mm . 2,140 250,4 + 2,833 180,4 k eff .i z i
i eff .i
zi
The connection initial stiffness may be predicted as E z 2 210 000 216,2 2 S j .ini = = = 47,529 10 9 Nmm / rad = 47 529 kNm / rad 1 1 k 4,842
38,8
2 ,7
= 2,988
47,529 10 9 = 15,907 10 9 Nmm / rad = 15 907 kNm / rad . 2,988 The moment rotation diagram of the joint is shown at Fig. 19.11 Sj = S j .ini =
47
Fig. 19.11 The connected beam plastic resistance is W pl f y 285,4 10 3 235 = = 58,3 10 6 Nmm = 58,3 kNm . M pl .Rd = M0 1,15 j) For given beam span may be the connection classified. The length, at which is the joint still rigid may be calculated as
Lb = 8 E Ib 8 210 000 27,7 10 6 = = 979 mm . S j .ini 47,529 10 9 M/M pl.Rd
1,00 Ib 0,66 Lb Rigid for beam longer than 0,979 m 0 E I b / (Lb Mpl,Rd . ) Fig. 19.12 Connection classification Lb
Notes: 1) 2) 3) The software may calculate with the bolt rows interaction, which is for hand calculation too long. The welds are designed for elastic frame global analyses. This joint is rigid for braced frames for beam longer than 0,98 m. The stiffness may be neglected.
48