Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Working in Groups
Working in Groups
2/27/2010
Succeeding in Groups
New York Giants winning 2008 Super Bowl - The New England Patriots had super players, megastar quarterback, a legendary coach, and a perfect season
- Yet New York Giants won the game demonstrating the power of groups to engage the right combination of talent and willpower to overcome all odds.
2/27/2010
Succeeding in Groups
Nobel Chemistry Prize Winner Dr. Peter Agre at John Hopkins University: I didnt do this work! I made the coffee and sharpen the pencils. on the he discovery of aquaporins, highlighting the importance of team work.
Succeeding in Groups
Examples of organized groups or people working together to achieve shared goals: Study groups Research groups Management teams Volunteer groups
2/27/2010
Case Study
The Study Group Dilemma Q1: Should Grace join the study group or work on her won? What would she gain or lose by that decision? How can some of the dialectic tensions described in this chapter affect how well a study group achieves its goals? What communication strategies should a study group use to ensure that members are satisfied with the process and the outcome? Have you ever participated in a study group? If yes, why did it succeed or not succeed?
2/27/2010
2/27/2010
Members
Goals
Interaction
Group Communication
Working
Interdependence
2/27/2010
Groups less than 5 lacks resources and diversity of opinions for effective problem solving. Example: Small prayer groups of 5-7 members in evangelical mega-churches. Larger groups also has core members of 5-7 members who do more work and take on leadership functions.
Groups larger than 15 members, lacks coordination and control, members may not know one another well, communication requires elaborate rules and procedures.
2/27/2010
Interaction
Requires verbal and nonverbal communication to generate meanings and establish relationships. Communication helps with sharing information and opinions, making decisions, solving problems, and develop interpersonal relationships The way in which group members communicate creates and reveals group dynamics. (appropriateness, which rules apply etc.)
Common Goal
Group members collective reason and goal defines and unifies the group. A goal is the purpose or objective toward which group work is directed. Goals are often assigned. (a semester-long marketing campaign assignment, assigned by a marketing instructor at a college). Some groups can establish their own goals. (A group of students may form a study group to prepare for English Language exams).
2/27/2010
Common Goal
Effective groups have a common goal and dedicate their efforts to accomplish that goal. The single factor that separates successful groups from unsuccessful ones, is having a clear goal because goals guide action, set standards for measuring success, provide a focus for resolving conflict and motivate members.
Interdependence
Each group member is affected and influenced by the actions of other members. A successful interdependent group functions as a cohesive team in which every member is responsible for doing his or her part. The failure of a single member can adversely affect the entire group. For groups to be successful members need to share information, give and receive advice, support , assistance and feedback from one another.
2/27/2010
Working
Work is the physical or mental effort used when trying to accomplish something.
This something can be a social goal-getting friends together for a surprise party-a family goaldeciding jointly to go on vacation-a work team goal-planning training sessions for improving patient care-management goal-developing a strategic plan for their organization.
10
2/27/2010
Channels
Member#3
Channels
Message/ Feedback
Channels Member#4
Member#1
11
2/27/2010
Messages:
ideas, information, opinions and or feelings that generate meaning , example: communicating the success of group members on an excellent job done.
Channels:
the media through which group members share messages: hearing, seeing, touching, smelling and tasting. Example; sending an email or bringing cookies or fruit to praise members.
Feedback:
the response or reaction to a message. By recognizing and adapting to feedback, you can assess how well others receive and interpret your messages.
Feedback: - Verbal or non-verbal response., smile, nod, look attentive when they speak. Thanks; Im pretty proud of the way we pulled together on this project. Context: physical and psychological environment in which a group communicates. It includes type and size of groups purpose and history, the physical setting, the groups role and status in organization, and the characteristics of and relationships among group members. Study group meeting in a cafeteria vs. well-established corporate marketing team holding a videoconference with international clients. Noise: anything that interferes with or inhibits communication. Noise can be external, such as loud people in the hallway, or a member walking late into a meeting, but also it can be internal and psychological> Biases, thoughts, fatigue, and hunger all affect how well you express your thoughts or interpret the messages of other members.
12
2/27/2010
Theory in Groups
System Theory(System Perspective) is a group of theories that examine how interdependent factors affect one another. Communication does not take place in isolation, but rather necessitates a communication system. Common characteristics include: Systems function in a particular environment in which they receive input and produce output. System components are interdependent. The contamination of one cell leads to the contamination of many cells. Systems have a purpose or goal. The digestive system converts food into fuel for the body. Systems are unpredictable. There are multiple ways of achieving the same goal in most systems. When a company is losing money, there are many options of solving the problem. Systems try to maintain a balance in their environment. When an ecosystem is invaded by unwelcome intruders, native organisms may defend their territory or move to a less hostile environment in order to restore equilibrium and harmony.
Groups as Systems
Groups are complex systems. The actions of individual members affect everyone in the group as well as the outcome of the groups efforts. Example: Pho Bo. In groups people are the major ingredients: in the right combination, they can produce a highly productive and satisfying experience. System theory tells us a great deal about the nature of groups and helps prepare us for the unpredictable tensions that characterize the work of a group and its members. It also helps us understand the behaviour of groups and their members: Groups as systems are part of a larger system. Group of students in a class are part of that class and the class is part of a year and the whole school system, which is part of the Education System and the whole national system.
13
2/27/2010
Groups in Balance
Create Synergy:
When three or more interdependent interact or work toward a common goal, they have the potential to create a synergistic system. Synergy is a term that describes the cooperative interaction of several factors that results in a combined effort greater than the total of all individual contributions. The whole is greater than the sum of its parts. The root of the word synergy comes from the Greek word meaning synergos meaning working together. Effective groups are synergistic. Companies whose executives earn modest salaries have surpassed companies in which the CEOs are paid millions of dollars. Ordinary groups have achieved extraordinary results.
Types of Groups
8 Categories of groups: Primary groups Social Groups Self-help groups Learning groups Service groups Civic groups Public groups
14
2/27/2010
Work Groups
Responsible for achieving specific tasks or performing routine duties in behalf of a company, organization, association, agency or institution. People at work may belong to several work groups such as committees and work teams.
Public Groups
Interacts in front of or for the benefit of the public. Involves in information sharing, decision making, or problem solving as well as concerned with making a positive impression on a public audience.
15
2/27/2010
Social Group
Athletic team, hobby groups, sororities and fraternities, peer groups Therapy groups and programs such as Weight Watchers, Alcoholic Anonymous, Parents without Parents Classmates, study groups, book discussion groups, professional workshops, health and fitness classes Charitable foundations
Self-Help Group
Learning Group
Service Group
Civic Group
PTA, labour unions, veteran groups, neighbourhood can community associations Committees, task forces, work teams, management teams Public panel discussions, symposiums, forums and governance groups
Work Group
Public Group
Ad-Hoc Committee Forms for a specific purpose and disbands once it has completed its assignment or task
Examples: ongoing business social committees, membership committees, and finance committees.
Examples: A government task force could examine health-care system or analyze the decline in a school systems test scores.
Examples: A health-care team attends to a specific patient or group of patients. A research team takes on a specific research project. A legal team forms and works to defend or prosecute a specific case.
16
2/27/2010
Symposiums
Forums
Governance Groups
More Creativity
Greater Civil Engagement
17
2/27/2010
18
2/27/2010
Group Dialectics
The contradictory tensions groups experience as they work toward a common goal. Effective groups engage in a cooperative effort balance group dialectics through effective group communication strategies. Successful groups and group members balance dialectic tensions by using both/and approach. For example in some groups you may both enjoy a warm friendships with some members and effectively cope with some members who are difficult.
Conflict Cohesion Conforming Nonconforming Task Dimensions Social Dimensions Homogenous Heterogeneous
Engaged Disengaged
Open System Closed System
Member energy and labour are balanced with the groups need for rest and renewal
External support and recognition are balanced with internal group solidarity and rewards
19
2/27/2010
Theory in Groups
Relational Dialectics Theory:
Leslie Baxter and Barbara Montgomery claims that relationships are characterized by ongoing, dialectic tensions between multiple contradictions, complexities and changes in human experiences. Opposites attract but Birds f a feather flock together. Twos a company; three is a crowd but The more, the merrier. Relational Dialectics Theory takes both/and approach instead of either/or response. There are several ways to resolve relational dialectic tensions: You can choose one option in different situations and at different points in time. Example: Normally, group meetings follow a highly structured agenda. Because group members are having difficulty coming up with a good solution to a problem, they decide to set aside the agenda for thirty minutes so they can do some unstructured brainstorming. You can choose different options for different psychological contexts. Example: Joe goes with the flow and adheres to group norms about keeping conflict under control, but when one member personally embarrasses another, he feels compelled to speak out against this behaviour in front of the entire group. You can choose one option and ignore the other. Example: Even though a group knows that two absent members would vote against a potential decision theyre discussing, they go ahead and make the decision anyway. (The least effective way to resolve relational dialectics as one has to give up or lose one option over another. Engaging both options to some degree is a better way.)
20
2/27/2010
Ethics in Groups
The National Communication Association Credo for Ethical Communication Advocate truthfulness, accuracy, honesty and reason for integrity of communication Freedom of expression, diversity of perspective, and tolerance of dissent for informed decision making Understand and respect communicators before evaluating and responding to their messages Promotes access to communication resources and opportunities
Ethics in Groups
Promote communication climates of caring and mutual understanding Condemn degrading communication Commitment to Expression of personal conviction Sharing of information, opinions and feelings.
21