Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Continental Philosophy
Angela Dykstra
Jason Wilson
Introduction
Hegel’s theory that two opposites (thesis and antithesis) when combined create something
new (synthesis), is key when attempting to unify consciousness with reality. This unification
theory flung the philosophical doors wind for nineteenth century Continental philosophers. With
his triadic focused system of finding absolute truth in Being by providing the manner in which
thought is structured, Hegel appeared to have cornered the market on how one knows that reality
is real.
As the modern world spun out of its previous calmness, European philosophers
responded to this chaos and Hegel’s neatly packaged idealism by introducing existentialism and
turn of the century and beyond would demand an unfiltered, conscious experience absent
(idealism) with pessimism (existentialism) evokes Hegel’s opposite’s theory. Too many isolated
state of affairs (idealism) had indeed become altogether real based upon individual choices
subjectivity and objectivity, Hegelian Idealism combined optimism and rationality to explain the
twentieth century ground upon which Continental philosophers sewed reactionary seeds during a
Existentialism
Existential theory states in part: Human existence is senseless, empty, trivial and thereby
renders humans unable to communicate, which in turn creates a life rife with anxiety, dread, self-
Continental Philosophy 3
doubt and despair. Existentialism views an individual as unique and alone in a hostile and
indifferent universe. Intense and decadent in its depth of a pessimistically bare-naked view of the
human condition; existentialism resonated deeply within artistic and literary circles of twentieth
2004 ). While Hegel maintained that “all reality is the expression of thought or reason” (Moore-
Bruder, 2005, p 157, ¶4), Sartre countered that reality was a self-created uniqueness based upon
ones personal choices. Existentialism is immune to culture, class, or nature as an explanation for
personal identity. Rather, said Sartre, one’s “existence precedes essence” (Moore-Bruder, 2005, p
170, ¶4).
cultural movement (Cowell, 2004 ). If, as Sartre wrote, ‘“man is nothing other than the whole of
his actions”’ (Moore-Bruder, 2005, p 173 ¶5), then existentialism forces one to acknowledge that
the atrocities manifesting themselves during the 1940’s were horrific. As such, reality was
demanding a philosophical witness and explanation. Sartre obliged. He offered no back-door exit
when one becomes uncomfortable with ones state of existence or, that which exists around him
or her. Rather, existentialism holds a mirror of reflection and says; if one is appalled by what one
sees in the human experience, then every individual is to blame. Sartre stated, ‘“You are what
you do”’ (Moore-Bruder, 2005, p 173 ¶5), thereby holding humanity accountable for the
condition of individual and collective civilized existence by proclaiming, “In choosing for
Phenomenology
Phenomenology, according to the SUEP web site, “…studies the structure of various
types of experience ranging from perception, thought, memory, imagination, emotion, desire, and
volition to bodily awareness, embodied action, and social activity, including linguistic activity”
(Smith, 2003). Based upon Husserl’s intentionality theory, “…phenomenology focuses on the
essential structures found within the stream of conscious experience – the stream of phenomena”
(Moore-Bruder, 2005, p 174, ¶2). While existentialism has been heavily influenced by art and
literature, phenomenology has been driven by philosophers. “The structure of these forms of
experience typically involves what Husserl called ‘intentionality’” (Moore-Bruder, 2005, p 174,
¶3).
Husserl proposed that science could study the structures involved in consciousness.
phenomena without making any assumptions about the world” (Moore-Bruder, 2005, p 175, ¶1).
Phenomenology asks one to examine the “directedness of experience toward things in the
world…” (Smith, 2003, ¶8) then applying “…pure impersonal consciousness to describe the
human ‘life world’ in terms of those essences (which all human beings share) found within
subjective, practical, and social conditions of human conscious experience (Moore-Bruder, 2005,
p 174,¶3 ).
The science of phenomenology says one can reflect upon an experience based upon: a
known past experience (Husserl), relevant social and linguistic context (Heidegger), and analysis
of the experience. Heidegger focused on the experiences of Being. Levinas was adamant that
Being and Other were separate phenomena. Levinas was convinced that, “a vigilance toward the
Continental Philosophy 5
Other ground our Being and represents the original form of openness to the world” (Moore-
Conclusion
With Sartre invalidating the need for Being by rendering God nonexistent, Heidegger’s
theory Being was “the basic principle of philosophy” (Moore-Bruder, 2005, p 176, ¶8), and
Levinas assertion that God is THE absolute otherness, Continental Philosophy perhaps illustrates
how determined the human species continues to be when consciously figuring reality out.
Phenomonology and existensialism both appear to have applied Hegel’s logic that synthesis
How does one personally and as a species make some kind of rational sense out of why,
how, when, and where one comes into contact with reality when so many different planes of
existence may exist? Existentialism and phenomenology each look at the result of bad faith,
authenticity, and a life’s project. Both employ Parmenides use of logic while reaching various
conclusions, albeit in different ways to support individual theories. This student found Sartre’s
existential logic easier to follow than Heidegger’s assertion that while logic could be equated
with truth, logic is a means of human control and thus should be considered an activity Being
All three schools argue successfully that humans are, in reality, arrogant and destructive;
assumptions regarding human superiority in its environment. Therefore, idealism cultivated the
fertile twentieth century ground upon which Continental philosophers sewed reactionary seeds
References
Moore, B. and Bruder, K. (2005). Philosophy: The Power of Ideas. (Sixth ed.), Part One.