Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) N. T. Longford, SNTL and UPF, Barcelona, Spain (sntlnick@sntl.co.uk) Annual surveys conducted in the countries of the European Union (EU) Key resource about household well-being Political agenda: Reduction of poverty Cross-sectional and longitudinal components Harmonisation: Similar sampling designs, questionnaires, data processing
Household income Combination of several sources: (self-)employment, pension, social transfers, inheritance, presents, rents, investments, etc. Household-level analysis a household shares all resources Equivalised household size (eHS): One adult: 1.0; other adults: 0.5; each child 0.3 total. Equivalised household income (eHI): eHI = Total income / eHS the key outcome variable Median eHI, eHI50 estimated with sampling weights
2
Household income Poverty status: Poor if eHI < S eHI50; Estimation of the poverty rate percentage of individuals/households that are poor as a function of S poverty curves Estimation of the sampling variance (standard error): Bootstrap (with weights) Other measures of (nancial) poverty: poverty gap: average shortfall on S eHI50
3
9879
Subject
10
13
11
14
15
12
10237
11110
11360
12476
12544
13738
14336
eHI
Median
The weighted sample median. An illustration. Subjects sorted by eHI and represented by segments of length proportional to their sammpling weights.
15873
6795
7296
7830
9483
9514
9616
9830
Subject Selections
1 0
2 0
3 4
4 2
5 0
6 3
7 0
8 1
9 0
10 1
11 0
12 0
13 2
14 0
15 2
12476
12544
10237
11360
15873
11110
13738
eHI
An illustration of bootstrap. Selection with probability proportional to the sampling weight, with replacement.
14336
7296
9483
9830
6795
9514
7830
9616
Austria 2010
^ ^ b
Frequency
20
40
11
13
Bootstrap estimation of the poverty rate in Austria in 2010. (Replicate) bootstrap estimates, their mean and 95% conf. interval (dots).
A. Austria 60
B. Multiplicative scale
eHI (2010)
40
eHI (2010) 10 20 30 40
20
20 5
40
10
eHI (2004) C. Differences 1.5 eHI (2010 2004) 10 eHI (2010 / 2004) 10 20 30 40 5 1.2 1.3 1.4
10
20
30
40
eHI (2004)
eHI (2004)
1.4
1.2
1.2 5
1.4
10
20
50
eHI (2004)
eHI (2004)
Bootstrap replicate estimates of the changes in eHI from 2004 to 2010 in Austria.
2004
IE EEGR IT ESPT
2010
IE PTES IT EELUGR BE DK FI FR SE AT IS NO
30
BE
FI FR ATSE IS LUDK NO
20
10
10
ES GR DK IT IE NOSEEEPT IS FIFR ATBE LU
20
40
60
80
100
EE GR PTES IT BE SE AT NO IE DK FR ISLU FI
20 20
30
40
60
80
100
The estimated poverty curves of the countries in EU-SILC in 2004 and 2010.
Poverty indexes Index: a single value national summary Example Poverty gap: The shortfall for a household is dened as (eHI50 S eHI)+ zero for households with income about the threshold
10