Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 3

When is an immigrant not an immigrant? Arnold is naturalized.

Obama may not


be if he traveled on that passport after 18 but then did not apply to become naturalized.
Why is Arnold an “immigrant” but Obama is not? Because his parents did not register his
birth here? Plus - our law does not state IMMIGRANTS may not become elected to this
office; it states you must be NATURAL BORN. What do you do if you have an accent
thus your truth can be heard even if it cannot be seen? You encourage a person to go first
to test the law and you make sure he’s more than willing to break the law so you can do
all of your ‘encouraging’ from behind the scenes as then - he’ll do all the dirty work for
you. You wait to see what SCOTUS does if someone sues and that’s only if the people
even bother to act to protect their rights. This is no conspiracy theory as it is happening
NOW thus it is history. You know what this is? Sleight of hand, eye and ear. It’s a
‘conspiracy’ of men who have all the wealth and unfair advantage acting against women
and the unethical acting against the ethical. If only I had Bloomberg’s advertising budget
that is FREE as he owns most of the news. At least the news we are ‘allowed’ to know
that is...Gee it was awfully quiet around my suit and other “natural birth” suits for a while,
wasn’t it?
The New Action Heroes
By Michael Grunwald Thursday, Jun. 14, 2007

On an unseasonably hot May day in Central Park, New York City Mayor Michael
Bloomberg — the pint-size billionaire whose last name needs no elaboration for anyone who knows
anything about finance or the media — was talking about saving the planet. With the mayors of more than
30 of the world's largest cities at his side, Bloomberg was opening a climate summit, highlighting his
ambitious plan to slash the Big Apple's carbon emissions. Together, the mayors pledged to enlist their 250
million constituents in the fight against global warming. "Unfortunately, partisan politics has immobilized
Washington," Bloomberg said. "But the public wants this problem solved. Cities can't wait any longer for
national governments to act."

At a lab in Toronto a week later, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger — the fridge-
size multimillionaire whose last name needs no elaboration, period — was talking about eliminating disease. The
Governator was announcing a new stem-cell partnership with Ontario, highlighting the $3 billion his state is
investing in research the Bush Administration has opposed. In that unmistakable Ahhll-be-bahhk accent, the five-
time Mr. Universe spoke of his father-in-law Sargent Shriver, the Peace Corps founder who suffers from
Alzheimer's and no longer recognizes his family. "I look forward to curing all these terrible illnesses,"
Schwarzenegger said. "We're showing how powerful a state can be. Cahh-lifornia doesn't need to wait for the
Federal government."

The Hollywood brute and the Wall Street mogul may look like the oddest couple since Twins, but there's a reason
Schwarzenegger calls Bloomberg his soul mate. They're both self-confident, self-made men who rose to stardom
from middle-class obscurity — Bloomberg in Medford, Mass., Schwarzenegger in Thal, Austria — through Tiger
Woods-level determination and Donald Trump-level salesmanship. They're both socially liberal Republicans who
have flourished in Democratic political cultures; Schwarzenegger is even a member of the Kennedy clan, through
his marriage to Maria Shriver. They both bounced back from poison-ivy approval ratings to easy re-elections in
influential places — Bloomberg in the world's media and financial center, Schwarzenegger in what he calls "the
nation-state of California," the world's entertainment trendsetter and eighth-largest economy. They're less
scripted than most politicians and seem to have more fun. Despite their image as a cutthroat
businessman and a shoot-'em-up macho man, they try to avoid political confrontation. And
they've both been talked up as centrist Presidential candidates — Bloomberg in 2008, even though
he says he's not running, and Schwarzenegger someday in the future, even though the
Constitution currently prohibits immigrants from running. – TIME

Currently? Why, do you have a plan? Who holds meetings to discuss the possibility of running if he’s
not? Who holds meetings to assess the cost to buy the election if he is not going to do it? And who holds
a press conference to say he DECIDED he will not run if he was never going to run? Bloomie acted
upon the idea of running thus he lied and is lying now as if his actual truth is “I am not running”? Then
there would have been no action on his part. Being from NY I know the offices of Governor, Senator
and NYC Mayor are used as a means to access the Whitehouse as if NY were a doormat. $1 is no
bargain for NYC or NY or the US; you might call it a deal with a devil not the devil. There’s a few
disturbing facts - as in history – in this story. All you needed to know are a few other facts of CA and
from around the world. I entered hardcore proof you cannot deny. None of this is accident or
coincidence; it is the unjust exploiting a system that is now unjust due to the refusal of this planet to
accord women liberty rights and other civil rights that are human rights.

In 2007 I entered this story by naming the magazine and its cover and supporting it with other evidence
rising to proof beyond any doubt as it is fact, as in actual reality, to then conclusively prove that
“Natural birth” was about to be removed from our law w/o me or women being accorded our rights –
actual equal protection and due process – and to prove all offices are unchecked thus any person with
the money or connections could then buy an office or title; that our law was about to be
unconstitutionally amended in such a way it would forever deny me and all women and children plus all
enlisted service members justice. I stated, as fact, that if you harm all women, all children and all
enlisted service members? And make it permanent? You then ensure all of humanity is injured as there
are only two kinds of humans: Boys and Girls plus only two kinds of citizens who possess the right:
mothers and veterans. I was told I was never harmed – that I never had any children - and that I was
crazy and dumb. If I’m so stupid and I’m so crazy then you tell me how it all came to pass??? If I was
never injured how did I know this??? It’s not ESP; it’s science as some science is law of this universe
just as some theology is law. Government can become a science – an actual art - especially if it’s
elegant.

I exactly named “Hawaii” based on my unique facts one of which is intelligence but I did not name
Obama, as I had no idea he was ‘from’ Hawaii until 2008. Like Bloomie, Obama is a fair weather
citizen. Who and what are you if you keep changing it at your whim and will? Obama could not even
state if he was Christian or Muslim, Kenyan or Indonesian, Hawaiian or Illinois-ian. Bloomie? He was a
Democrat, then a Republican and now he claims to be Independent as it’s a set up – he plans to buy the
office at some future point. How do I know this as fact? Him as he told us and then acted upon the
thought and ME, as I’m constant and I’m independent; if you are actually independent? You do not act
this way – How is this independent? As you’re dependent upon popularity and obtuseness - plus 20 year
olds change who and what they are every five seconds not 60 year olds. If you are everything, as you
never define you even remotely or as you switch from party to party to party, you have all kinds of
friends in ‘high’ places, don’t you? Who’s your opposing force? Nobody, as they all own a piece of you
or you own them outright.

If we had only Jefferson and no Hamilton what would have become of us? Not much. Take me as I
needed to oppose SCOTUS as it then advanced my own cause – my personhood. What will we turn into
if we become a homogenous sea of nothing but unethical ‘human’ chameleons? You might change A
belief or even SOME beliefs but do you then change an entire belief system? Without actual reason or
cause? PUH LEEZ! That’s: Unconstitutional, as you have no faith. Once again use my life as an
example as no matter what any person said or did and no matter what harm I suffered at the hands of an
‘authority’ or an institution I not once, not ever doubted US law or God. I did have to amend some
beliefs and I did have to let go of others but nothing and no one could force or cause me to violate my
ethic or the law and no one could shake my faith in US law.

I would know as fact if a person were actually independent. I’m the foremost expert and leading
authority on Independence as I was born independent and declared my independence over and over and
never looked back. If I’m ever 60 and can’t decide who and what I am? You have my permission to put
me out to pasture as my brain and my soul is mush.

The unjust ‘authorities’ and unjust citizens not once managed to shake or break my faith in something
else: The Justices and SCOTUS itself. So you know John Roberts: I can and will testify in “Will” ’s
defense – whoever he is – as I know as fact w/o question he truly did not know something and that is
because of the nature of the injury. Remember – he was honest as honest could be about his person and
his true beliefs; that threat? It was proof that he had been injured by the unjust men holding office, the
discrimination of women and every teacher he ever met in law school as they taught him something as
absolute fact that is not. I can prove he did not commit a crime and in fact he was one of two or three
persons ever in ten years who told me the facts upfront and all of those people were men who were
clerks of a court. That means something ‘good’ not ‘bad’. Besides - until he met me over the phone? He
had zero evidence that his belief was not a fact of this world and US law and the Supreme Court.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi