Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

BA Hons Dance Performance 2009-10

Assessment feedback Collaborative PracticesDevised Performance- Body Project Student: Bilio Kaliakatsou Comments (1st Marker) Mariza Vinieratou 1. Evidence of intelligent engagement with the learning experience provided: Excellent Very Good Good Concern

2. Evidence of the ability to synthesise ideas and information, ordering existing knowledge and/or developing new knowledge: Excellent Very Good Good Concern

3. Evidence of the ability to assess the status of and strategies behind processual work: Excellent Very Good Good Concern

4. Evidence of knowledge of key issues in current practice and address them in your discussion/reflection. Excellent Very Good Good Concern

5. Evidence of the ability to formulate a critical framework to enable a reflection on your emergent methods of practice including the ability to document, analyse and reflect on practice (including students own practice), with reference to formative influences, critical and evaluative strategies and working processes Excellent Very Good Good Concern

6. Evidence of your role as artist/researcher at work, demonstrating rigorous attention to stages of experimentation in the process Excellent Very Good Good Concern

Additional comments: The project had a clear identifiable focus; the students were able to identify interesting subtleties as incongruence of body parts, and manipulations of effort qualities. It was a good first presentation with clear focus. Bilio collaborated very well with the group and showed understanding of the concepts at work. She also showed great potential towards movement invention. She now needs to work further on her performing skills, discover further concepts and theories in order to widen her perspective in relation to her work. Suggested mark (first marker); Signed: Date: 10th November 2010 61

2nd Marker FOR MODERATION/ NOT FOR STUDENTS Name of 2nd Marker: Dimitris Tsioukas Student: Bilio Kaliakatsou Please rate as EXCELLENT, VERY GOOD, GOOD, CONCERN next to each criteria 1. Evidence of intelligent engagement with the learning experience provided: VERY GOOD 2. Evidence of the ability to synthesise ideas and information, ordering existing knowledge and/or developing new knowledge: GOOD 3. Evidence of the ability to assess the status of and strategies behind processual work: GOOD 4. Evidence of knowledge of key issues in current practice and address them in your discussion/reflection: GOOD 5. Evidence of the ability to formulate a critical framework to enable a reflection on your emergent methods of practice including the ability to document, analyse and reflect on practice (including students own practice), with reference to formative influences, critical and evaluative strategies and working processes: GOOD 6. Evidence of your role as artist/researcher at work, demonstrating rigorous attention to stages of experimentation in the process: GOOD Further comments: Overall good work. Suggested Mark: 62 Signed: Date: 10th November 2010

MODERATED RESULTS First Marker: Suggested mark (second marker) _________ Agreed Mark (if applicable) _________ ________

____________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ____________________

(signature of first marker) (signature of second marker) (date finalised)

(date finalised)