Is the evolution of Windows a story of Creation?

Clive Longbottom, Service Director

Quocirca Comment
Looking at the different headlines around the latest version of Windows, it is forgivable for a person to be somewhat confused. Is Windows 8 the best thing since, well, Windows 7, based on it selling faster than anything else Microsoft has ever put out there, or is it the biggest dead duck since Windows Vista based on Microsoft being late to the market and missing the point? The answer is probably a mix of the two and the finer points need looking at to understand where Windows 8 is at the moment, and how other systems are impacting it. Firstly, Windows 8 is late to the game. Apple has managed to wrest a large number of users over to its side based on being able to present well designed devices that are so simple to use that the average user didnt have to enter into any religious war on Microsoft v. Apple. The majority of users happily bought the fashion statement of the Apple iPad tablet and used it alongside their company machines the vast majority of which were and are based on Windows, even if this is XP. According to StatCounter, XP usage is still running globally at just under 25% of all desktop systems and the majority of this use will be within organisations. The majority of iPad users did not desert Microsoft. The real problem lay within the fact that although the iPad was and is a fantastic device for consuming information from the web and even in the form of emails, it is pretty poor when it comes to creating usable information on the go. Yes, emails can be answered; Facebook can be posted; Tweets can be Tweeted. But, try writing a 1,400 word article such as this one on the iPad. The soft keyboard is OK for ad hoc use, but it isnt a patch on a proper keyboard. Try and create a PowerPoint-style presentation on an iPad it isnt easy. Try and deal with a complex spreadsheet youll want your PC or laptop to be with you pretty quickly. Even with an external keyboard and a suitable support stand, the iPad doesnt seem to be there for serious content creation and once everything starts to be added, you are back to many of the problems of old: multiple wires for connections, even if it is only to keep everything charged up. Bluetooth connectivity has removed the need for hard connections in places but power still is the main problem. Apple has made a great job of many parts of mobility but where does it go next? The first real contender to Apples tablet dominance came through from the Android camp. With a more open platform, Android was attractive to the person technical enough to understand the difference between an open platform and a walled garden but the general public were less impressed with the often underwhelming me too Apple designs and the paucity of choice of apps that could be easily downloaded for what anybody really wanted to do. By the time the Android app store had enough (and suitable) apps, there was then the problem of the different versions of Android that were out there. From the Gingerbread release in 2010, there have then been Honeycomb, Ice Cream Sandwich and Jelly Bean. Many vendors had designed tablets that were dependent on a specific Android release, and this meant that newer functionality and improvements from later releases could not be applied to their tablets something that Apple had managed to handle reasonably well, even where its iPads and iPhones could not support later iOS releases. However, the latest versions of Android-based phones and tablets are taking market away from Apple and Apple has responded through its patent storm, accusing many other vendors of using patents that it owns in their devices. This does, on the whole, seem to be backfiring, as courts either find against Apple or are reversing findings for them on appeal, or massively reducing any fines applied to other vendors.

Is the evolution of Windows a story of Creation?

http://www.quocirca.com

2013 Quocirca Ltd

Meanwhile, with the other parties involved in legal shenanigans and upgrade wars, Microsoft launched its Surface RT tablet. Based on a cutdown version of Windows 8 specifically aimed at long battery life touch tablets, the Surface RT devices came with the Modern UI (formally known as Metro) and a special set of apps written for the Windows RT environment. Surface RT could not run existing Windows applications everything that it does run has to be from directly within the Modern UI. And this was a problem for Microsoft. Unlike Apple and the Android vendors which had no large history of applications to support, Microsoft was issuing a tablet that was not Microsoft enough. It competes well with Apple on the design front; the Modern UI works well and battery life is good. But it suffers from the same issues as the iPad even with the included keyboard built in to the jacket, it is not very good at content creation and sales were OK, but not amazing. Microsoft also did a bad job of pushing its hardware partners to come up with interesting and innovative tablets themselves. It took a long while before full-blown Windows 8 tablets came to market capable of running not only Modern UI apps, but also all the existing Windows applications that users already had. Finally, the likes of Dell, Lenovo, HP, Asus, Sony came to market with Windows 8 tablets and although some of them were innovative, they also had big problems. The main trouble with full Windows 8 is that it needs a proper cpu. Low-voltage, low-current ARM chips as used for Windows RT cannot run Windows 8, and so full Intel i3, i5 or i7 chips are required. Windows 8 can run on Intels low-power Atom chip, but there have been reported issues in multi-tasking and overall performance. The Atom Z2760 system on chip (SoC) unit has a maximum power drain of 1.7 Watts. In comparison, the Intel i3 3217U cpu as used in the lowest spec Sony Duo Touch Windows 8 hybrid tablet runs at 17W ten times as much. Intel is introducing new Bay Trail Atom chips during 2013 that it says will address these issues. At the moment, this means that whereas a Windows RT tablet can run for a whole working day without the need to make a visit to a power source, a Windows 8 tablet with adequate performance tends to run out of power half way

through the day. And these are not like an Apple iPad: it is not just a case of a single small adaptor and a USB to proprietary connector cable. No, a full, heavy laptop-style power unit is required, adding around 0.5kg or more to the already considerable weight of the system itself. But, systems such as the Sony Duo, the Dell Inspiron Duo, the Lenovo Yoga, Lynx and Twist all come with that capability that Apple and many of the Android vendors have missed they are suitable for content creation. With good keyboards and the capability to run full Windows applications, here are devices which are familiar in many ways to users and yet also have the capability to do things in innovative and interesting ways. This is where Microsoft needs to be making its push. Sure, Android vendors such as Asus have done similar things with the Transformer but this still means running non-Windows applications and having the risk of a lack of fidelity of content in round-tripping between the office-based (or even Office-based, as in Microsofts Office suite of applications) Windows systems and the Androidbased tablets. Many can deal with this; many cannot. Microsoft has also got to sort out the heartland of its business market. The PC is not yet ready to die, and many business users are still tethered to Windows XP-based machines. Windows 8 brings major capabilities to the fore with faster speeds, lower resource footprint and a better security system, yet Microsoft has done little to try and encourage hardware vendors to get suitable monitors in place to give touchscreen support to the desktop. Only now, nearly 5 months down the line from the general availability of Windows 8, are monitors that are fully Windows 8 certified coming through to market. Hardware vendors seem to have bet the farm on all users moving to a completely new device for an organisation with just 100 desktops in place, this could be an up-front cost in excess of 70,000. This sort of cost is not possible in the current economic climate. Re-use of existing machines with only the monitors being upgraded would make a migration far more likely. What is certain is that Microsoft no longer has an automatic hold on the main device for the user any longer. Apple is getting to the point where it

Is the evolution of Windows a story of Creation?

http://www.quocirca.com

2013 Quocirca Ltd

must make more than an incremental step in innovation to remain where it is. The Android vendors are showing that they can innovate and the growing raft of Apps in the store is making Android tablets more appealing. Microsoft has to make its play in multiple ways. It has to be able to show the general consumer that it is innovative and interesting; it has to show the business-based road warrior that it supports them in their social, information consuming activities and also in their business-focused information creation roles. And it must also provide an easy and cost-effective upgrade path to a full Windows 8 experience for the PC-based user of which there will remain many hundreds of millions for the foreseeable future. This article first appeared http://www.computerweekly.com on

Is the evolution of Windows a story of Creation?

http://www.quocirca.com

2013 Quocirca Ltd

About Quocirca
Quocirca is a primary research and analysis company specialising in the business impact of information technology and communications (ITC). With world-wide, native language reach, Quocirca provides in-depth insights into the views of buyers and influencers in large, mid-sized and small organisations. Its analyst team is made up of realworld practitioners with first-hand experience of ITC delivery who continuously research and track the industry and its real usage in the markets. Through researching perceptions, Quocirca uncovers the real hurdles to technology adoption the personal and political aspects of an organisations environment and the pressures of the need for demonstrable business value in any implementation. This capability to uncover and report back on the end-user perceptions in the market enables Quocirca to advise on the realities of technology adoption, not the promises. Quocirca research is always pragmatic, business orientated and conducted in the context of the bigger picture. ITC has the ability to transform businesses and the processes that drive them, but often fails to do so. Quocircas mission is to help organisations improve their success rate in process enablement through better levels of understanding and the adoption of the correct technologies at the correct time. Quocirca has a pro-active primary research programme, regularly surveying users, purchasers and resellers of ITC products and services on emerging, evolving and maturing technologies. Over time, Quocirca has built a picture of long term investment trends, providing invaluable information for the whole of the ITC community. Quocirca works with global and local providers of ITC products and services to help them deliver on the promise that ITC holds for business. Quocircas clients include Oracle, IBM, CA, O2, T-Mobile, HP, Xerox, Ricoh and Symantec, along with other large and medium sized vendors, service providers and more specialist firms.

Full access to all of Quocircas public output (reports, articles, presentations, blogs and videos) can be made at http://www.quocirca.com

Is the evolution of Windows a story of Creation?

http://www.quocirca.com

2013 Quocirca Ltd