Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 4

_______________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________

Report Information from ProQuest


July 06 2013 06:23 _______________________________________________________________

06 July 2013

ProQuest

Table of contents
1. Gender Differences in Learning Constructs, Shifts in Learning Constructs, and Their Relationship to Course Achievement in a Structured Inquiry, Yearlong College Physics Course for Life Science Majors......

06 July 2013

ii

ProQuest

Document 1 of 1

Gender Differences in Learning Constructs, Shifts in Learning Constructs, and Their Relationship to Course Achievement in a Structured Inquiry, Yearlong College Physics Course for Life Science Majors
Author: Cavallo, Ann M L; Potter, Wendell H; Rozman, Michelle Publication info: School Science and Mathematics 104.6 (Oct 2004): 288-300. ProQuest document link Abstract: This study investigated differences and shifts in learning and motivation constructs among male and female students in a nonmajors, yearlong structured inquiry college physics course and examined how these variables were related to physics understanding and course achievement. Tests and questionnaires measured students' learning approaches, motivational goals, self-efficacy, epistemological beliefs, scientific reasoning abilities, and understanding of central physics concepts at the beginning and end of the course. Course achievement scores were also obtained. The findings showed that male students had significantly higher selfefficacy, performance goals, and physics understanding compared to females, which persisted throughout the course. Differential shifts were found in students 'meaningful learning approaches, with females tending to use less meaningful learning from beginning to end of the course; and males using more meaningful learning over this time period. For both males and females, self-efficacy significantly predicted physics understanding and course achievement. For females, higher reasoning ability was also a significant predictor of understanding and achievement; whereas for males, learning goals and rote learning were significant predictors, but in a negative direction. The findings reveal that different variables of learning and motivation may be important for females 'success in inquiry physics compared to males. Instructors should be cognizant of those needs in order to best help all students learn and achieve in college physics. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] Subject: Gender differences; Curricula; Learning; Teaching methods; Physics; College students; Academic achievement; Comparative analysis Publication title: School Science and Mathematics Volume: 104 Issue: 6 Pages: 288-300 Number of pages: 13 Publication year: 2004 Publication date: Oct 2004 Year: 2004 Publisher: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Place of publication: Hoboken Country of publication: United Kingdom Publication subject: Mathematics, Education--Teaching Methods And Curriculum, Sciences: Comprehensive Works ISSN: 00366803

06 July 2013

Page 1 of 2

ProQuest

Source type: Scholarly Journals Language of publication: English Document type: Feature Document feature: Graphs; Tables; References; Equations ProQuest document ID: 195205074 Document URL: http://search.proquest.com/docview/195205074?accountid=15533 Copyright: Copyright School Science and Mathematics Association, Incorporated Oct 2004 Last updated: 2012-04-05

_______________________________________________________________
Contact ProQuest

Copyright 2012 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. - Terms and Conditions

06 July 2013

Page 2 of 2

ProQuest

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi