Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
CRN & AEI Conference Reengineering the Appraisal: A Return to Market Fundamentals
THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND DO NOT CONSTITUTE, OR FORM PART OF, ANY OFFER OR INVITATION TO UNDERWRITE, SUBSCRIBE FOR OR OTHERWISE ACQUIRE OR DISPOSE OF, OR ANY SOLICITATION OF ANY OFFER TO UNDERWRITE, SUBSCRIBE FOR OR OTHERWISE ACQUIRE OR DISPOSE OF, ANY SECURITIES AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE THE BASIS FOR ANY CREDIT OR ANY OTHER THIRD PARTY EVALUATION OF SECURITIES. IF ANY SUCH OFFER OR INVITATION IS MADE, IT WILL BE DONE SO PURSUANT TO SEPARATE AND DISTINCT DOCUMENTATION IN THE FORM OF A PROSPECTUS, OFFERING CIRCULAR OR OTHER EQUIVALENT DOCUMENT (A "PROSPECTUS") AND ANY DECISION TO PURCHASE OR SUBSCRIBE FOR ANY SECURITIES PURSUANT TO SUCH OFFER OR INVITATION SHOULD BE MADE SOLELY ON THE BASIS OF SUCH PROSPECTUS AND NOT THESE MATERIALS. THESE MATERIALS SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED AS A RECOMMENDATION THAT ANY INVESTOR SHOULD SUBSCRIBE FOR OR PURCHASE ANY SECURITIES. ANY PERSON WHO SUBSEQUENTLY ACQUIRES SECURITIES MUST RELY SOLELY ON A PROSPECTUS IN CONNECTION WITH SUCH SECURITIES, ON THE BASIS OF WHICH ALONE PURCHASES OF OR SUBSCRIPTION FOR SUCH SECURITIES SHOULD BE MADE. IN PARTICULAR, INVESTORS SHOULD PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO ANY SECTIONS OF SUCH PROSPECTUS DESCRIBING ANY RISK FACTORS. THE MERITS OR SUITABILITY OF ANY SECURITIES OR ANY TRANSACTION DESCRIBED IN THESE MATERIALS TO A PARTICULAR PERSON'S SITUATION SHOULD BE INDEPENDENTLY DETERMINED BY SUCH PERSON. ANY SUCH DETERMINATION SHOULD INVOLVE, INTER ALIA, AN ASSESSMENT OF THE LEGAL, TAX, ACCOUNTING, REGULATORY, FINANCIAL, CREDIT AND OTHER RELATED ASPECTS OF THE SECURITIES OR SUCH TRANSACTION. THESE MATERIALS ARE CONFIDENTIAL, ARE BEING MADE AVAILABLE TO SELECTED RECIPIENTS ONLY AND ARE SOLELY FOR THE INFORMATION OF SUCH RECIPIENTS. THESE MATERIALS MUST NOT BE REPRODUCED, REDISTRIBUTED OR PASSED ON TO ANY OTHER PERSON OR PUBLISHED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE VERBAND DEUTSCHER PFANDBRIEFBANKEN.
Content
1. Real estate finance under the Basel Accord 2. The value at risk approach: the stabilized value
Basel I
u Standardized Approach: risk weights provided by law (Basel framework) Internal Ratings Based Approach: risk weights based on EAD, PD, LGD, M
4 4
Standardized Approach:
Claims secured by residential property: 35% (instead of 75%) risk weight based on strict prudential criteria: the value of the property exceeds the claim by a substantial margin strict valuation rules Claims secured by commercial real estate: 100% risk weight in principle Exceptionally: 50% risk weight for the tranche of the loan that does not exceed 50% of the market value or 60% of the mortgage lending value of the property & additional circumstances (stable markets, low loss rates etc.) Real estate is eligible for recognition as collateral if a certain number of requirements are met, thereof the assessment of the objective market value of the collateral Recognition of real estate collateral through lower LGDs: 35% (instead of 45%) Advanced IRBA: banks own LGD measurement offer another significant leverage driving LGDs down to approx. 20%
5
Risk Management
Capital Markets and Property Valuation: Mortgage funding through Covered Bonds (Pfandbrief): the business model
Pfandbrief is a bank debenture, cover assets remain on balance Pfandbrief is collateralized by cover assets subject to strict eligibility criteria: regional restrictions LTV limits (only tranches up to 60% of mortgage lending value are eligible for cover) conservative property valuation rules apply (mortgage lending value) upon deterioration of cover asset quality: credit check, potential revision or substitution Insolvency remoteness: cover asset separation in the case of insolvency of the Pfandbriefbank All standards enforced by banking supervision
8
key features
no public supervision
liquidity of bonds
access to funds
Transposition of Basel II into European Law Value-at-risk concerns motivated the European legislator to introduce in addition to market value a mortgage lending value based approach:
Mortgage lending value means the value of the property as determined by a prudent assessment of the future marketability of the property taking into account long-term sustainable aspects of the property, the normal and local market conditions, the current use and alternative appropriate uses of the property. Speculative elements shall not be taken into account in the assessment of the mortgage lending value. The mortgage lending value shall be documented in a transparent and clear manner. Valuers must be independent. This means a person who possesses the necessary qualifications, ability and experience to execute a valuation and who is independent from the credit decision process.
10
total load
(annuity)
Interest portion
11
Market Value Mortgage Lending Value 60 % LTV limit for the preferential risk weight and for Covered Bond funding
Duration
Conservative valuation of real estate Properties must be inspected Speculative elements to be excluded Mortgage Lending Value must not be higher than Market value at the time of valuation Strict Valuation criteria Property to be fit for third-party utilization (use/user) Objective and comprehensible market data Transparency of valuation Independence of the valuer
12
Basic principles of the Mortgage Lending Value methodology Net rental income:
The income stream of the property should be no more than the sustainable net rental income that the type of property usually produces over time in the specific local market on the basis of a judgment of past and current long-term market trends, excluding any actual over-rent and other extraordinary cash flows.
Deduction from the net rental income of all operational and administrative cost, allowances for obsolescence, reinvestment, annual maintenance, vacancy risk, tenant default risk and further risks to the rent.
Operational cost:
Capitalization rate:
The application of the capitalization rate must reflect long term market trends and exclude all short term expectations regarding the return on investment of the property. The assessment shall include the sustainably income producing capacity of the property, multi-purpose or appropriate alternative uses as well as the future marketability of the property.
13
Sustainable Valuation
Market Value Valuation Procedure:
Investment Method: Input Parameters:
Sustainable yield derived from long term market development Minimum 5 % or 6 % Regulated bonds for remaining useful life (10 to 80 years)
Land value sustainable achievable Recent value of the building ./. 10 % security haircut 14
100
150
50
1986 Q4 1987 Q4 1988 Q4 1989 Q4 1990 Q4 1991 Q4 1992 Q4 1993 Q4 1994 Q4 1995 Q4 1996 Q4 1997 Q4 1998 Q4 1999 Q4 2000 Q4 2001 Q4 2002 Q4 2003 Q4 2004 Q4 2005 Q4 2006 Q4 2007 Q4 2008 Q4 2009 Q4 2010 Q4 2011 Q4 2012 Q4 2013 Q4 2014 Q4 2015 Q4
0 5 10 15
Source: EUROHYPO
Sustainable Rent ?
Vacancy Rate (%)
Sustainable rent maximum on market rent level depends on cycle situation, history and future perspective
15
10 /m market value
Mortgage Lending Value vs. Market Value a comparative calculation Multi-family home (1)
9 /m MLV
16
9 /m market value
Mortgage Lending Value vs. Market Value: a comparative calculation Multi-family home (2)
9 /m MLV
17
20 /m market value
17 /m MLV
18
17 /m market value
17 /m MLV
19
7.00% 14.29 PV factor into perpetuity 394,938 x 14.3 = Income Value 5,643,664 324,511 5,319,153 $5,320,000
54,437 308,479
= 61,750 246,729
Present Value of Building calculation Remaining Economic Life 60 years Property capitalization rate 6.50% Multiplier (PV factor) 15.03 Present Value of Building Plus Land Value Total Property Value Less: additional purchase costs @ 5.75% Mortgage Lending Value (rounded)
20
Summary Value-at-risk aspects of property valuation progressively materialized with the Basel rules since late 1990ies and this applies to both asset & liability sides of banks balance sheets:
lower risk weights: under the Basel framework, property valuation is now a
prerequisite for mortgage lenders to get access to lower risk weights: no mortgage collateral recognition without prior valuation ! lower funding costs: investor protection requires legislators to introduce
solid and prudent valuation rules when the safety of the funding instrument
is based on the value of the underlying properties
Property valuation is more and more recognized as an important risk management tool for the measurement of the risk sensitivity of real estate finance Independence and education of valuers are crucial prerequisites for the reliability of the appraisal system
21
3. How fixed rate mortgages and prudent property valuation shape the German property market
Source: vdpResearch
22
110.6
110
109.1
107.7 107.3
105.7
Index, 2003=100
105
105.1 105.2
105.4 105.4 104.2 103.8 103.4 102.9 101.7 104.5 104.8 104.4
105.6
105.8
105.6 105.0
105.5
101.1
100
95
Source: vdpResearch
90
2003:1
2003:2
2003:3
2003:4
2004:1
2004:2
2004:3
2004:4
2005:1
2005:2
2005:3
2005:4
2006:1
2006:2
2006:3
2006:4
2007:1
2007:2
2007:3
2007:4
2008:1
2008:2
2008:3
2008:4
2009:1
2009:2
2009:3
2009:4
2010:1
2010:2
2010:3
2010:4
2011:1
2011:2
23
240
220
Spain
200
180
UK USA France
160
140
Netherlands
120
Ireland Germany
100
80
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
1. HJ 2010
24
25
Rent development and capital values for office real estate in Germany and the US
180
Germany
Mietindex Rent index Germany Value index Germany Wertindex
180
USA
Mietindex USA Rent index USA Value index USA Wertindex USA
160
160
Rents and capital values Mieten und Kaptitalwerte = 100) 2003 (Index, (Index, 2003 = 100)
140
Rentsund and capital values MietKapitalwerte 100) = 2003 (Index, (Index, 2003 = 100)
2011:II 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
140
120
120
100
100
80
80
2011:II 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Source: vdpResearch
26
Loss rates of residential & commercial mortgage lending from 1988 to 2008 in Germany all banks
1. Commercial properties
Year First mortgage loss rates in % Total loss rates in %
2. Residential properties
Year First mortgage loss rates in % Total loss rates in %
1988
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993
0.030
0.044 0.029 0.022 0.019 0.021
0.076
0.108 0.074 0.055 0.045 0.053
1988
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993
0.042
0.028 0.020 0.013 0.014 0.013
0.115
0.080 0.053 0.035 0.036 0.035
1994
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Source: vdp
0.032
0.030 0.032 0.022 0.040 0.068 0.083 0.066 0.033 0.064 0.071 0.095 0.141 0.054 0.099
0.075
0.093 0.105 0.087 0.117 0.393 0.424 0.437 0.345 0.443 0.427 0.432 0.409 0.168 0.234
1994
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
0.009
0.010 0.017 0.022 0.028 0.022 0.029 0.034 0.038 0.042 0.054 0.069 0.072 0.044 0.050
0.024
0.037 0.056 0.054 0.074 0.099 0.189 0.216 0.267 0.288 0.327 0.359 0.210 0.155 0.151
27
Federal Association of German Volksbanken und Raiffeisenbanken Co-operative Banks Federal Association of German Banks
The Association of German Public Banks Saving Banks Finance Group The Association of German Pfandbrief Banks
! Professional Ethics !
29
Lifelong Learning
Completed studies at university, e.g.: architecture, law, economics, business administration, etc.
At least 5 years of professional practice in real estate business
30
I. Written Exam
Part I: Drafting of two valuations, one market value and one mortgage lending value appraisal duration of exam: 2 hours 15 minutes Part II: Plausibility check of an incorrect mortgage lending value appraisal with high degree of difficulty duration of exam: 1 hour Part III: Answering questions on various topics from the examination list duration of exam: 2 hours
31
Re-certification
every 5 years precondition for participation: positive assessment of the certificate holder during the ongoing monitoring process expert interview: 30 minutes, including a short presentation of one the appraisals submitted during the ongoing monitoring process
32
Cooperation Agreement
Cross approval Appraisal Institute and HypZert Seminars and lectures in the other partner country to the property market in the U.S. or in Germany Exchange of information, data and results of the research Creation of international standards and cooperation with organizations such as WAVO, IVSC and TEGoVA Examination of MAI in Germany by HypZert
33
34