Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Reliability-Based Design of Transmission Line Structures - Direct Approach Using the Inverse Reliability Method
Abstract
A reliability-based design procedure using the inverse reliability method is proposed in this paper for design of overhead transmission structures. The procedure allows direct and fast determination of design parameters such as wind span and pole groundline circumference, in order to meet pre-specified target reliabilities. Two design applications are illustrated: 1) calculation of the design wind span of a lattice steel suspension tower so that a target reliability is achieved in a compression performance criterion; and 2) determination of design wind span of an H-frame tangent wood pole structure to achieve target reliabilities associated with design criteria in tip deflection (serviceability criterion) and bending (ultimate design criterion). The advantages and implications of these approaches are discussed. Keywords: inverse reliability, structural analysis, wood pole, steel lattice tower, reliabilitybased design
Introduction
The main objective in engineering design is to ensure that the required performance can be met during service life. The performance of a designed system depends on the interaction of many intervening random variables, plus the designparameters that the designer has chosen on the basis of safety and serviceability criteria. Given the uncertainty associated with intervening variables, the performance criteria can only be satisfied within a certain probability. The objective of reliability-based design is to determine the design parameters needed so that the probability of performance, called reliability, will achieve the design criterion within a specified target level.
Structural& ReliabilityEngineer,PowertcchLabs. Inc., 12388-88thAve., Surrey,BC, Canada V3W 7R7; phone 604-590-7463, Fax 604-590-5347; hong.li@powertechlabs.com z SpecialistEngineer,PowertechLabs. Inc., 12388-88thAve., Surrey,BC, CanadaV3W 7R7; phone 604-590-7407, Fax 604-590-5347; gouri.bhuyan@powertechlabs.com 357
Electrical Transmission in a New Age
358
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Fundacion Universidad Del Notre on 06/12/13. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
If the design parameters are given, the reliability of a system can be evaluated for a certain condition and period of time through reliability assessment. This is a forward reliability problem. On the other hand, when the design parameters need to be determined in order to achieve pre-specified target reliability levels, the problem becomes one of inverse reliability. This inverse reliability problem defines the nature of reliability-based design. Reliability-based design has been studied and applied to overhead structure design for the last two decades (Peyrot et. al, 1984, Krishnasanmy, 1991, ASCE-74, 1991 and IEC 60826, 1991). Several methodologies have been proposed, including: 1) the Load/Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) format, in which the load factors and resistance factor are calibrated to meet target reliability, and 2) design nominal load with a certain return period and characteristic strength with a low exclusion limit, in which the load return period is used to specify indirectly the target annual reliability level. Traditionally, reliability-based design or LRFD design is implemented through a design equation containing load factors and resistance factor that are intended for meeting a specified reliability. However, the design engineers do not generally know the rationale behind the factors chosen and the reliability or safety level that is really achieved. If the nominal load has a return period of T years, and a strength exclusion limit of 10% is used as the characteristic strength, the achieved annual probability of failure is in the order of Pf = 1/2T. For example, if the return period were 50 years, the annual probability of failure would be in the order of 1.0%. Local weather statistics can be used to determine the nominal design load for a specified return period. Another method is that of inverse reliability, where the design parameters are directly calculated to achieve a specified target reliability. Using this approach, an engineer could work on a customized or case-by-case basis, taking into account local weather statistics with the assistance of reliability software. The desired performance criteria can be met with the corresponding target reliability. In this paper a direct approach, based on the inverse reliability method, is proposed for the reliability-based design of transmission structures. Two design applications will be demonstrated: 1. Calculation of the design wind span of a lattice steel suspension tower to achieve a target reliability associated with the compression performance criterion for a critical member; and Calculation of the design wind span of an H-frame tangent wood pole structure so that target reliabilities associated with design criteria in both deflection and bending can be achieved.
2.
359
where U is the random, Standard Normal vector with components u~.corresponding to the random variable vector Xwith components xi in the original, basic space, d is the design parameter. For a target reliability index 13, the inverse reliability problem can be stated as: Given: 13, Find: a design parameter d ....................................................................................... Subjectto: r n i n ( U r U ) = ~
2 and G(X,,d)=O
(2)
(q~(u,))
360
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Fundacion Universidad Del Notre on 06/12/13. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
where Ft is the cumulative distribution function for the variable xi, and qb(.) is the Standard Normal function. From reliability index [3, the probability of failure Pf and the reliability P~ can be estimated approximately as shown in (4) and (5), by use of the Standard Normal probability distribution function qb(.).
Pf = qb(-[3) ................................................................................................................
andPr: 1 -~[3)=~(~) .........................................................................................
(4) (5)
Two basic formulae were derived to iterate the design parameter for a given target reliability index [3. U =
........................................................................................
6)
d =d o
OG(Uo, d) )[
~d d~
.....................................................................................
7)
For an initial pair (do, Uo), and the corresponding gradient VvG(U, d)l uo.ao, (6) and (7) are used together to obtain both the vector U and the design parameter d by means of a Newton-Raphson iteration.
Case Studies
361
In reliability-based analysis, an analytical model formulated either as a close-form equation or as a computational program is needed to evaluate the effect of loads considered in the limit-state functions, such as deflection, bending moment and compression force. For this case study, it is assumed that the tower has a linear behavior in compression, thus the influence coefficient (effect of unit loads) can be used to calculate the structural response. To obtain the influence coefficient, structural analysis software ATADS (BPA, 2000) was used to calculate the effect (compression force of the leg member) of the unit vertical group loads and unit horizontal group loads as well as unit wind pressure. If a combined stress level due to applied vertical and transverse loads exceeds the compression capacity of the member, the structure will fail. For the reliability calculations, the limit state functions corresponding to compression failure of the leg member are written as follows, considering two load cases:
362
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Fundacion Universidad Del Notre on 06/12/13. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
ELECTRICALTRANSMISSIONIN A NEWAGE
Wind + ice: G = R A - effect o f ( T S + ( V + D ) S p + d+ P) ........................................ (8) Wind only: G = R A - effect o f ( TS + D S p + d + P) ................................................. (9) where: S= T= p = V= D= d= P= design wind span transverse load (function of wind velocity and/or ice thickness) per unit length of conductors ratio of weight span to wind span vertical load (function of ice thickness) per unit length of conductors dead load per unit length contributed by the weight of conductors dead load contributed by the weight of members wind pressure applied on the structure
RA = compression capacity The effect is the compression force of the leg member. Three random variables are considered: compression capacity RA, wind velocity, and ice thickness. For specified target reliability, the design wind span S can be calculated based on the algorithm described above. Statistics of wind velocity, ice thickness, and compression capacity (treated as random variables) are assumed and shown in Table 1 for this case study.
Component
Type
Lognormal Gumbel Gumbel Gumbel
Compression capacity RA Extreme wind* Wind during ice Ice * * Annual maximum
The inverse reliability procedure was carried out for three target reliability levels, 13= 3.0, 2.5 and 2.0, corresponding to a probability of failure of 0.14%, 0.62% and 2.3% respectively, in a 50-year window. The results are shown in Table 2. The design is governed by the wind with ice case. The corresponding target reliability is achieved exactly, and the target reliability for the wind-only case is satisfied, thus providing a satisfactory design for both load cases. It should be noted that different design spans could be obtained if the weather statistics change due to change of tower location. Ideally, if the weather statistics for all design sites are available, such reliability-based design could lead to a nearly uniform design across the board.
363
Table 2: Design Span and Achieved Reliabilit, Index Target Reliability Index (50 years) Wind Wind + only ice 3.0 2.5 2.0 3.0 2.5 2.0 Design Span Wind only 223m 733 (fi) 297m 976 (if) 380m 1249(ft) Wind + ice 106m 347 (~) 187m 614 (~) 307m 1008(~) Controlling Span 106m 347(fi) 187 m 614 (fl) 307 m 1008 (ft) Achieved Reliability Index Wind Wind + only ice 3.98 3.28 2.44 3.00 2.50 2.00
(1 O)
Serviceability: G2 = Ao - Effect o f ( TS + (V+D) Sp +P) ....................................... (11) where: S = design wind span p = ratio of weight span to wind span T = transverse load (function of wind velocity and/or ice thickness) per unit length of conductors V = vertical load (function of ice thickness) per unit length of conductor D = dead load per unit length contributed by the weight of conductors P = wind pressure applied on the structure R = bending strength Ao = allowable tip deflection of the wood pole, assuming 2% of the height of the pole
364
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Fundacion Universidad Del Notre on 06/12/13. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
Figure 2: A typical tangent H-frame wood structure Three random variables are considered in the limit state functions: bending strength R, transverse load T (function of wind velocity), and vertical load V (ftmction of radial ice thickness). Mean, coefficient of variation and type of distribution of the bending strength are given in Table 3. Wind and ice statistics were used for the same location as Case Study 1 (see Table 1), but only the wind during ice load case was considered. Table 3: Statistics of Bending Strength Mean 45.5 MPa (6600 psi ) COV 0.15 Type Lognormal
Using the inverse reliability method, the reliability-based design was carried out for various target reliabilities for each design criterion. The results are shown in Table 4. For ultimate and serviceability limit states, two different target reliabilities are specified. The design is controlled by the ultimate limit state. The corresponding reliability index is achieved exactly, and the target reliability corresponding to serviceability is also satisfied.
365
Table 4: Results (Wind with Ice Case Target Reliability Index (50 years)
,.Q
Design Span
e~
.E
= O r..)
c13
'E Y~
3.00 2.50 2.00 2.16 1.63 1.11
An alternative design approach for transmission line structures using the inverse reliability method is proposed in this paper. Two case studies were carried out, one for a lattice tower structure mad one for an H-frame wood structure. Design span was chosen as the design parameter to reflect various target reliability levels. It should be noted that any other parameter could have been chosen, such as the groundline diameter of the wood pole or the compression capacity of a leg member of the steel tower when the span is fixed. In contrast to the traditional deterministic or reliabilitycalibrated factored design approach, the approach developed in this paper permits direct determination of the design parameter to meet desired performance. Since the desired performance is well defined by limit-state function and associated target reliability, the achieved performance will be transparent to the design engineers. The uncertainties involved in loads and material properties are automatically taken into account during the procedure. Line importance, local weather conditions, material properties, and multiple design criteria can be easily considered, allowing for a customized design. In addition, this reliability-based design approach offers the opportunity to use well-developed reliability theory and computer technology to complement structural mechanics and computational tools.
References
Advanced Tower Analysis and Design System (ATADS) Software, Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) ASCE-74. (1991). Guidelinesfor Transmission Line Structural Loading Der Kiureghian, A., Zhang, Y, and Li, C.C. (1994). "Inverse reliability problem", J. of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 120(5), p. 1154-1159.
366
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Fundacion Universidad Del Notre on 06/12/13. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
IEC 60826 - Design Criteria of Overhead Transmission Lines. (1991). (Also the previously published guidelines: Loading and Strength of Overhead Transmission Lines), IEC-TC11-Publication 826. Krishnasamy, S. G., Hathout, I. And Tabatabai, M. (1991). "Reliability-based design of overhead transmission structures- a critical review". Proc. Int. Conf. on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Electric Power Systems, London, UK, p. 86-91 Li, H. (1999). "An inverse reliability method and its applications in engineering design", Ph.D. thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. Li, H. and Foschi, R.O. (1998). "An inverse reliability method and its application", Structural Safety, Elsevier, 20(3), p. 257-270. Peyrot, A.H. and Dagher, H.J. (1984). "Reliability-based design of transmission lines" Journal of structural engineering ASCE, Vol. 110, No. 11, p. 2758-2777. POLE: A Computer Program to Carry Out Reliability Analysis of Pole Structures. (1998). Powertech Labs.