Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Dr. Mirza Shiraz Baig Department of Pharmacology Govt. Medical College Aurangabad.
Please switch off your mobiles I will be speaking for around 45 min as per allotted time & may exceed 15 minutes ! Please dont leave the hall when I am speaking this will definitely disturb me. Total 69 slides remaining including thank U slide Thanks for your kind reading .
Outline.
Protocol Draft & references Case report form Essential formats (appendices) Professional Negligence
WHAT DO WE MEAN BY A STRONG RESEARCH TEAM? Research Team: A group of people working together in a systematic and scientific manner to establish facts Strong Research Team: Committed to applying the principles of Good Clinical Practice (GCP).
Final protocol (ethical and scientific, statistician) Evaluation (scientific review, IEC/IRB) Implementation Final analysis and publication
7
Background and rationale (with supporting studies & references) Specific objectives (Primary and Secondary) Patient selection criteria (Inclusion and Exclusion) Study Design & Randomization Study population & recruitment Detail procedures/Methodology If Drug used then treatment schedules (details) Methods of patient evaluation (detail study Procedure) Patient information sheet & informed consent (In Vernacular language) Discontinuation /Withdrawal/Follow up criterias Sponsors details/Forms and data handling Declaration of Helsinki /Data Safety/Quality assurance/Patient privacy.
13.
14. 15. 16.
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Also known as the PI An individual who actually conducts the clinical trial Is the leader of the research team at the site Is responsible for the conduct of the study
QUALIFICATIONS OF THE PI
An appropriately qualified person Trained and experienced in clinical research Familiar with the background of the study and the requirements of the study Has high ethical standards and professional integrity
10
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PI
Obtain IRB/IEC approval of the protocol and informed consent prior to initiation of study Enroll eligible patients as per protocol Obtain informed consent from patients or parents/guardians of children Observe, measure and document all effects of study (response, AEs, etc) Record all data pertinent to study
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PI
Evaluate, manage (treat) all toxicities Report toxicities as specified in protocol Submit protocol changes or amendments to the IRB/IEC for approval Notify IRB/IEC of any issues that pose a threat to the welfare of the patients on the study Maintain study documentation and make this available for data verification Comply with all procedures specified in protocol in accordance with GCP.
12
CO-INVESTIGATORS
Investigators who share responsibility along with the PI through out the study period. They are equally responsible for study..
PI should take meeting and disclose all fine details of the study to the co-investigators
13
14
Full title of protocol Shortened title, if one is typically used by you or your Center/Dept.
Protocol Number
S Y N O P S I S
Diagnosis and Main Note the main clinical disease state under study and the key inclusion criteria (i.e. not the entire Inclusion Criteria list that will appear later in the protocol rather only the key inclusion criteria) Study Product, Dose, Route, Regimen Duration of administration Reference therapy Statistical Methodology
Study drug name (generic name, though can also state marketed name if name-brand used in the study). Also dose, dose route and dose regimen
Total duration of drug product administration (including any open-label lead-in, if applicable). Note if there is a standard reference therapy against which the study product is being compared, or if the reference is a placebo A very brief description of the main elements of the statistical methodology to be used in the study. (As few lines as possible). 15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
19.
Publication Plans
25
26
Prevents collection of data that will not be used Prevents failure to collect crucial information Better estimates of sample size for analysis of sub groups
A LEGAL DOCUMENT
28
29
30
31
must have disease of interest Subject must have a certain amount of disease Subject must understand study and agree to participate Other
32
33
must not be on an active treatment Subject must not be allergic to intervention Pregnancy, breastfeeding, child Other
Subject
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
not collected Database may require modificationNot allowed Data Entry process impeded Target dates are missed OR Collected too much data Wasted resources in collection and processing
APPENDICES
46
47
48
49
50
treatment
51
Post-study adverse events (instructions at last scheduled visit) To be followed till resolved / subject is lost to follow-up or otherwise explained .. Abnormal laboratory values. Hospitalization, Prolonged hospitalization or Surgery. Recording of adverse events.(AE module of CRF) Reporting of serious adverse events: Sponsor/IEC/FDA. Unblinding procedures.
52
Probably Related
Possibly Related Probably Not Related Not Related
53
54
55
56
57
58
BIAS
59
sure groups are equivalent Standardize outcome assessment Randomization Blinding single- or double-blind versus openlabel role of placebo ?? triple-blind
60
COMMON PROBLEMS IN STUDY PROTOCOLS ?? Too ambitious: too many questions !! Insufficient attention to previous literature Poor justification
why is it important to answer this question? what impact does it have on public health?
Poorly formulated objectives! Unspecific. Inappropriate analysis Inadequate description Absence of pilot or test
62
PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE :
63
PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE :
- Breach of duty/ subject has suffered damagethe relatives may approach* Civil court to claim compensation. * Criminal court demanding punishment to the doctor. - Under civil law : The physician is liable for Unlimited monetary claim from patient or successor in case of damage/death. Indian contract act, 1872 can be filed.
64
65
4. 338 of IPC : Rash/negligent act causes grievous hurt imprisonment upto 2 years or fine upto Rs.1000/- or both (it is a bailable offence).
There are provisions under section 406 of IPC to charge the investigator for criminal breach of trust and under section 420 of IPC to charge the investigator for cheating.
66
SUMMARY
Protocol lays out who, what, why, when, where, how...
Safeguards participants.
67
68
WHY PROTOCOL DESIGNING !! Higher quality protocol = More efficient study execution
69
Thank you .
70