Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 111

CF Industries Holdings, Inc.

Investor Day
June 11, 2013

A tightly focused strategy well executed

NYSE: CF

Safe Harbor Statement


All statements in this communication, other than those relating to historical facts, are forward -looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to a number of assumptions, risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include, among others: the volatility of natural gas prices in North America; the cyclical nature of our business and the agricultural sector; the global commodity nature of our fertilizer products, the impact of global supply and demand on our selling prices, and the intense global competition from other fertilizer producers; conditions in the U.S. agricultural industry; reliance on third party providers of transportation services and equipment; difficulties in the implementation of a new enterprise resource planning system and risks associated with cyber security; weather conditions; our ability to complete our recently announced production capacity expansion projects on schedule as planned and on budget or at all; risks associated with other expansions of our business, including unanticipated adverse consequences and the significant resources that could be required; potential liabilities and expenditures related to environmental and health and safety laws and regulations; our potential inability to obtain or maintain required permits and governmental approvals or to meet financial assurance requirements from governmental authorities; future regulatory restrictions and requirements related to greenhouse gas emissions; the seasonality of the fertilizer business; the impact of changing market conditions on our forward sales programs; risks involving derivatives and the effectiveness of our risk measurement and hedging activities; the significant risks and hazards involved in producing and handling our products against which we may not be fully insured; our reliance on a limited number of key facilities; risks associated with joint ventures; acts of terrorism and regulations to combat terrorism; difficulties in securing the supply and delivery of raw materials, increases in their costs and or delays or interruptions in their delivery; risks associated with international operations; losses on our investments in securities; deterioration of global market and economic conditions; our ability to manage our indebtedness; and loss of key members of management and professional staff. More detailed information about factors that may affect our performance may be found in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our most recent periodic reports filed on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q, which are available in the Investor Relations section of the CF Industries Web site. Forward-looking statements are given only as of the date of this communication and we disclaim any obligation to update or revise the forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. This presentation includes certain non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures, which is available in the Appendix. 2

Overview

Steve Wilson Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

A tightly focused strategy well executed


3

Agenda

8:00am 8:20am 8:50am 9:20am 9:30am

Steve Wilson Doug Hoadley Phil Koch Break Bert Frost

Introduction Agriculture and Fertilizer Background Natural Gas and Logistics Sales and Market Development Operations and Capacity Expansion Financial Management Summary

10:00am Tony Will 10:30am Break 10:40am Dennis Kelleher 11:10am Steve Wilson 11:20am Q&A

A tightly focused strategy well executed


4

Investment Thesis
Strategy Tightly Focused On Core Strength As a Nitrogen and Phosphate Producer

Long-Term Industry Growth Favorable Industry Environment

Demand growth underpinned by population growth, higher protein diets Search for higher yields leads to consistent consumption

North America (Canada and the U.S.) imports almost 40% of its nitrogen needs

Long-term North American natural gas costs estimated to be $3-$5/MMBtu


Significant offshore capacity operates at the high end of the cost curve Positioned to serve the worlds largest and most productive corn growing area

Operational Advantages

Extensive North American production and distribution footprint


Transportation assets provide logistical flexibility Peer-leading financial performance Disciplined capital allocation decisions Experienced talented management team

Excellent Execution

Tightly Focused Strategy

Core strength as a nitrogen and phosphate producer

Seven nitrogen complexes near major customers and with low cost feedstock Vertically integrated and well-matched phosphate mine and fertilizer plant

Dedicated to safety and operational excellence

Emphasis on safe operations and environmental stewardship Ongoing investments in physical assets enables very high capacity utilization

Integrated logistics system

Utilization of pipeline, waterway, rail and truck transportation modes Over 70 in-market storage terminals and warehouses in a 20-state region

Strong sales and marketing presence

Deep and long-term customer relationships Informed and rigorous process for managing product prices and order book

Prudent financial management

Focus on cash flow Investment grade credit ratings and metrics Record of effective capital management
6

CF Industries Has Consistently Outperformed Peers

A tightly focused strategy to capitalize on nitrogen advantages and optimize phosphate business Well executed by experienced talented management

A tightly focused strategy well executed

CF Industries management has a record of consistent excellent execution. Meet the companys senior leadership team.

A tightly focused strategy well executed

Doug Barnard Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary Total Business Experience: 31 Years Joined CF Industries: 2004
9

A tightly focused strategy well executed

Bert Frost Senior Vice President, Sales and Market Development Total Business Experience: 26 Years Joined CF Industries: 2008
10

A tightly focused strategy well executed

Wendy Jablow Spertus Senior Vice President, Human Resources Total Business Experience: 29 Years Joined CF Industries: 2007
11

A tightly focused strategy well executed

Dennis Kelleher Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Total Business Experience: 27 Years Joined CF Industries: 2011
12

A tightly focused strategy well executed

Phil Koch Senior Vice President, Supply Chain Total Business Experience: 39 Years Joined CF Industries: 2003
13

A tightly focused strategy well executed

Tony Will Senior Vice President, Manufacturing and Distribution Total Business Experience: 25 Years Joined CF Industries: 2007
14

Excellent Execution
Gross Margin as % of Sales
60% 50% 40% 32 30% 20% 10% 0% 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 LTM LTM LTM LTM LTM 47 51 52 49 43 43 60% 50% 40% 32 28 28 49 45 45 54 55

EBITDA as % of Sales(1)
55

28 27 27

22

25

30% 21 20% 10% 0% 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 17 16 16

27 28 23 20 20

2012

2011

2012

2011

2012 Yara 22 2012 Yara

LTM

LTM

LTM

LTM

CF Industries

Agrium

Mosaic

PotashCorp

Yara

(3) CF Industries

Agrium

Mosaic

PotashCorp

Return on Invested Capital (2)


40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 LTM LTM LTM LTM LTM (3) CF Industries
(1) (2) (3)

Return on Equity (2)


45% 40% 35% 34 33 39

34 34 34

31
27 21 22 21 21 14 15 21 21 19

23
19 14 14 22 14 13 17

30% 25%

15 15

14 14

20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011

2012

2011

LTM

LTM

LTM

LTM

Agrium

Mosaic

PotashCorp

Yara

(3) CF Industries

Agrium

Mosaic

PotashCorp

Calculated using Agrium, Yara and PotashCorp. self-reported EBITDA. Mosaic EBITDA calculated from its reported financials, consistent with the methodology used for CF Industries as described on slide 110. See slide 111 for a definition of invested capital, Return on Invested Capital and Return on Equity. See slide 110-111 for reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures.

15

LTM

LTM

Cash Returned to Shareholders


Dividends & Share Repurchases as % of Equity Market Value (1)
10% 8% 9 7 6 6%

$218 million of dividends since 2010 $2.25 billion of share repurchases since 2011 $2.25 billion remaining on 2012 ($3.0 billion) authorization as of April 30, 2013 Recognized for effectiveness of share repurchase program

4
4% 2% 0% LTM LTM LTM LTM 3 Yr Avrg. 3 Yr Avrg. 3 Yr Avrg. 3 Yr Avrg. 3 Yr Avrg. 14 3 Yr Avrg. LTM 19 16 13 LTM 3 3 2 2 3 2

(3)

CF Industries

Agrium

Mosaic

PotashCorp

Yara

Dividends & Share Repurchases as % of EBITDA (2)


50%

40
40% 30% 20% 10% 34 23 24 24

16

3 Yr Avrg.

3 Yr Avrg.

3 Yr Avrg.

(3)

CF Industries
(1) (2) (3)

Agrium

Mosaic

3 Yr Avrg.

A tightly focused strategy well executed

0% LTM LTM LTM LTM

PotashCorp

Yara

See slide 110 for a definition of Equity Market Value. Calculated using Agrium, Yara and PotashCorp. self-reported EBITDA. Mosaic EBITDA calculated from its reported financials, consistent with the methodology used for CF Industries as described on slide 110. See slide 110-111 for reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures.

16

History of Value Creation

Management track record of bold and disciplined actions


2005: Initial Public Offering at $16/share 2008: Announced and completed $500M share repurchase program 2009: Bid for Terra Industries 2010: Closed Terra Industries acquisition 2011: Expenditure of $1B for share repurchase program 2012: Expenditure of $500M to complete $1.5B share repurchase program; Announced C$0.9B agreement to purchase outstanding interests in CFL; Authorized new $3B share repurchase program; Announced $3.8B capacity expansion project 2013: Expenditure of $750M for share repurchases under the $3B authorization (as of April 30); Completed acquisition of all outstanding interests in CFL

Tightly focused strategy based on thorough study and analysis

Disciplined decisions based on rigorous DCF analysis and stress testing


Effective execution demonstrated by financial results and share price performance

CF Industries shareholders have been rewarded by managements disciplined strategic decisions


17

Capital Allocation Impact

Increased nitrogen volume over 150% since 2010

CF Industries Nitrogen Volumes and Shares Outstanding


Million Nutrient Tons Million Shares Outstanding April 30, 2010

9
8

1.7

8.5

72.0

Projects approved in 2012 and underway will lead to total nitrogen volume increase of 225% since 2010

Share Count 7

3.6
6 5

0.1
Jan. 31, 2013

0.3

6.6

0.1

65.5

April 30, 2013

59.0

Share repurchase activity has reduced share count 17% since Terra acquisition

3 2 1

2.6
52.5

Jan. 29, 2010

Remaining share repurchase authorization of $2.25 billion as of April 30, 2013

0 2010 PreTerra Previously 34% CFL (2) Terra Acquisition Executed Acquisition (1) Debottlenecks Current Planned New Plants Debottlenecks (4) (3) Total 2016

46.0

(1) Excludes 34% of Canadian Fertilizers Limited (CFL) that was owned by Viterra. CFL operations were treated as a consolidated variable interest entity in CF Industries Holdings, Inc. financial statements. (2) Acquisition of all outstanding interests in CFL closed April 30, 2013. (3) Approved ammonia debottleneck projects that are in process. (4) New plant construction projects.

18

A tightly focused strategy well executed


1600%

CF Industries Share Price Performance


+1,090%(1) 38% CAGR Since IPO(1)

1400%

1200%

1000%

800%

600%

400%

200%

0% 8/10/2005

8/10/2006

8/10/2007

8/10/2008

8/10/2009

8/10/2010

8/10/2011

8/10/2012

(1) Share price appreciation from IPO through 3/31/13

19

Agenda

8:00am 8:20am 8:50am 9:20am 9:30am

Steve Wilson Doug Hoadley Phil Koch Break Bert Frost

Introduction Agriculture and Fertilizer Background Natural Gas and Logistics Sales and Market Development Operations and Capacity Expansion Financial Management Summary

10:00am Tony Will 10:30am Break 10:40am Dennis Kelleher 11:10am Steve Wilson 11:20am Q&A

A tightly focused strategy well executed


20

Agriculture and Fertilizer Background

Doug Hoadley Director, Agri-Business Analysis

A tightly focused strategy well executed


21

Agricultural and Nitrogen Themes


Corn prices around $5 per bushel is a sweet spot for fertilizer industry
Farm income remains high Crop returns continue to favor corn and plantings are projected to continue at 92+ million acres Corn demand should recover in 2013, especially for feed and exports, and show growth through 2016 U.S. fertilizer demand is forecast to decline slightly next year, but remain at historically high levels through 2016

World nitrogen demand shows consistent 2% growth


Global nitrogen demand growth is equivalent to over 6 million product tons of urea or about 4-5 new plants each year (net of closures) Global 2013 urea cost curve suggests strong support at $320-$340/st at U.S. Gulf Although numerous projects have been announced for the next three years, historically only about 50% to 60% come onstream These nitrogen capacity additions are not expected to have a material impact on the hypothetical margin available to North American producers

North America currently imports about 38% of its total nitrogen use from offshore
For planning purposes, CF Industries assumes that 6 million tons of new ammonia capacity will be added in North America, mostly in 2016 to 2018 This new capacity should displace offshore nitrogen imports, which would decline by about 40%

22

Corn Prices Moderating In the Near Term


The Season Average Corn Price has risen over the last decade due to:
Increasing feed, food and export demand Adoption of Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS) Reduced production due to drought conditions
U.S. Corn Prices
$8.00
(U.S. Dollars per Bushel)

$7.00

$6.00

$5.00

$4.00

U.S. corn price is projected to decline to around $5 per bushel in 2013 as production recovers due to high planted acreage and higher yields
Farmers and ethanol producers are highly profitable at this level Demand is projected to recover with lower prices, especially for feed and exports
23

$3.00

$2.00

$1.00

$0.00 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012E


Source: USDA, CF Marketing Year

Economics Favor Corn Planting


The 2013 estimated average corn budget shows that corn returns over variable costs are $163 per acre higher than soybean returns, based on an average of March-April new crop futures for 2013 Farmer economics favor corn planting over soybeans in 2014 Based on current new crop 2014 futures, returns over variable costs are $194 per acre higher for corn than soybeans Assumptions include:
Trend yields March/April average for new crop prices and for 2014 calculation using corn price of $5.60 per bushel and soybean price of $12.80 USDA costs of production and CF Industries forecast of costs for 2014
24

U.S. Farmer Anticipated Returns over Variable Costs


(U.S. Dollars per Acre)

$600

Corn

Corn-on-Corn

Soybeans

$500

$400

$300

$200

$100

$0 2009
Source: USDA, CF Calendar Year

2010

2011

2012E

2013F

2014F

Corn Stocks Expected to Increase Modestly


The 2012/13 stocks-to-use ratio is expected to be the lowest since 1995
U.S. Corn Stocks-to-Use Ratio
23%
21% 19%
158 bu/acre and 97M acres 155 bu/acre and 96M acres 150 bu/acre and 96M acres

The 2013/14 stocks-to-use ratio is expected to increase, but is highly dependent on the actual yield
2013 plantings and emergence have been delayed substantially and are expected to result in lower planted corn acres compared with USDAs Prospective Plantings report Production forecast:
CF Industries forecasts a 155 bu/acre corn yield and a $5.00 season average corn price If corn yields decline to 150 bu/acre, the stocksto-use ratios could fall to 8-10% and support prices above the current forecast

17%
15% 13% 11%

97M acres

96M acres

96M acres

9% 7% 5% 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012E

Source: USDA, CF Marketing Year

25

Strong Growth in U.S. Corn Demand


U.S. Corn Demand
(Thousand Bushels)

Demand for U.S. corn is forecast to recover in 2013 and continue to show growth through 2016
Ethanol use is forecast to increase to meet the RFS standard in 2013

16 14 12

Exports

Feed

DDG

Ethanol

FS&I

DDG demand, a by-product of ethanol production, is forecast to continue to grow for feed use
Feed and Residual use is forecast to increase

10
8 6 4 2 0

Exports in 2013 are forecast to nearly double the 40-year record low level in 2012, with growth forecast to continue through 2016

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012 2014F 2016F

Source: USDA, CF Marketing Year

26

U.S. Corn Plantings to Remain Above 90 Million Acres


CF Industries forecasts 2013 U.S. corn acreage at 96 million acres, but continued planting delays could result in lower acreage 2014 U.S. corn acreage is expected to be between 92-97 million acres and is highly dependent on future weather and demand response CF Industries is forecasting corn planted acreage to remain at 92+ million acres through 2016 U.S. nitrogen demand is forecast to remain high as lower corn acreage is offset by an increase in planting to other crops along with a modest increase in application rates
27

U.S. Corn Acreage


100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65
(Million Acres)

60
55 50 2004
Source: USDA, CF Marketing Year

2006

2008

2010

2012E 2014F 2016F

U.S. Fertilizer Demand Remains High


U.S. nitrogen fertilizer demand is projected at 13.3 million nutrient tons in 2013, near the record high level in 2012 U.S. nitrogen fertilizer demand is projected to decline slightly for 2014 due to lower corn plantings
Decline expected to result in fewer imports, but no change in domestic production
Fertilizer Year Nutrient Demand
(Million Nutrient Tons)

N
2010
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

P2O5
4.1
4.3 4.4 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.5

K20
4.5
4.6 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9

Total
20.8
21.8 22.5 22.3 22.3 22.5 22.7

12.3
12.8 13.4 13.3 13.2 13.3 13.4

Nitrogen demand is expected to remain at historically high levels through 2016 with modest growth in application rates on corn to increase yields Phosphate demand is forecast to be nearly unchanged over the time period at around 4.3-4.4 million nutrient tons
28

Source: AAPFCO, CF

Fertilizer Remains a Good Value


Since 2005, farm revenue has increased while fertilizer costs as a percentage of farm revenue have decreased As a percent of corn revenue, U.S. fertilizer costs are projected to stay below the 10-year average of 20%, indicating fertilizer offers a good return on investment Assumptions for 2014 include:
Average annual corn price of $5.00 per bushel Fertilizer costs are projected at $121 per acre Corn yield of 155 bushels per acre
Farm Revenue (Million U.S. Dollars)

U.S. Corn Fertilizer Cost as Percent of Revenue


Revenue Fertilizer Percent Ten Year Average

Fertilizer Percent

$1,200

30%

$1,000

25%

$800

20%

$600

15%

$400

10%

$200

5%

$0 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013F


Source: USDA, CF Calendar Year

0%

29

Stable Long-Term Demand Growth


World Nitrogen Demand

Global nitrogen demand growth is projected to slow from the prior decade to a rate of about 2.0% per year, or about 3 million nutrient tons a year The annual nitrogen demand growth is equivalent to over 6 million product tons of urea or about 4-5 new plants each year (net of closures) Industrial use is projected to grow at 3.4% per year, largely due to increasing demand for emissions control Nitrogen demand growth is expected to be strongest in developing regions, particularly FSU, Asia, and Latin America

(Million Nutrient Tons) Fertilizer Industrial

180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0


Source: IFA, FERTECON, CF Calendar Year

Fct. CAGR: 2.0%


CAGR: 2.3%

30

Operating Rates Remain High


World Nitrogen Utilization

Global capacity is expected to increase by 14% between 2013 and 2018 The increase in capacity is expected to reduce the global operating rate from over 80% to about 78% However, a large portion of the expansions are set to occur in China, where continued government export controls and off-setting plant closures are expected Operating rates outside China are expected to remain high and near todays levels of 84%

Million Tons

Operating Rates

Capacity

Production Op. Rate Ex-China

250

Op. Rate

90% 85%

200 80% 75% 70% 100 65% 60% 50 55% 0 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Source: FERTECON, CF Calendar Year

150

50%

31

Significant Capacity Additions Announced


Net Additions to Global Urea Capacity, ex-China

CF Industries examines global urea capacity ex-China to reflect the world trade situation more accurately Chinas export policy is more important than its actual capacity Based on announced projects, urea production capacity would be expected to increase by approximately 22 million tonnes, ex-China, by 2016 Lists of future projects typically overestimate actual capacity brought online by as much as 50%
32

(Million Product Tonnes)

-2 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014F 2016F


Source: FERTECON, CF Calendar Year

Actual Additions Well Below Announced Additions


CF Industries compared FERTECONs list of future urea projects at the beginning of each year to the actual capacity that came onstream

FERTECON Urea Capacity Additions, Ex-China


(Million Metric Tonnes Per Year)

Forecast

Actual

On average, 50% of the total forecast capacity came onstream by the end of the year

IFA recently noted a similar situation with their nitrogen capacity list

Comparing the 2012 list with the current list, IFA stated: At least 25 urea projects were delayed, accounting for 60% of the announced capacity by 2016. These delays have removed up to 18 Mt of planned urea capacity that had been foreseen for 2016 in the forecast of May 2012.

0 2008
Source: FERTECON, CF Calendar Year

2010

2012

33

North American Production Costs Well Below Urea Floor Price

Costs of product delivered to the U.S. Gulf based on each countrys cash costs and freight rates

2013 World Urea Production Costs


$/ton 400 350 300

(Estimated $U.S. per Short Ton Delivered U.S. Gulf)

Urea global floor price is estimated to range from $320 per ton to $340 per ton delivered to the U.S. Gulf based on Chinese and Eastern European production
Eastern Europe and other FSU producers are the marginal producers during Chinas high export tax season A typical U.S. producer has cash production costs of about $150 per ton at $4/MMBtu natural gas CF Industries has significant margin opportunity at the projected urea floor price

Demand 183 M Tons

Hypothetical Floor Margin


250 200

150 100 50 0
North America Other Latin America Egypt Trinidad + Venezuela China Low Coal

0
Middle East Other Africa Algeria

50
Southeast Asia Russia Low Russia Base South Asia

100
China (Gas) Ukraine DF Group Ukraine OPZ

150
China Base Coal Western Europe

200

Source: FERTECON, CF

34

Eastern Europe Other FSU

Million Product Tons

Additions Not Expected to Change Floor Price Materially


2018 World Urea Production Costs

(Projected $U.S. per Short Ton Delivered U.S. Gulf)

For 2018, urea production costs are $/ton expected to rise for most producers as400 feedstock costs increase 350
300

Demand 203 M Tons

The urea floor price is estimated to be approximately $350 per ton delivered to the U.S. Gulf based on Chinese and FSU production

250 200 150 100 50

Hypothetical Floor Margin

Assumes new capacity of approximately 6 million tons

Other Latin America Egypt Trinidad + Venezuela

China Low Coal

Ukraine DF Group Ukraine OPZ

CF Industries should continue to have significant margin opportunity at the projected urea floor price

Source: FERTECON, CF

35

China Base Coal

Other FSU Western Europe

Southeast Asia

North America

Eastern Europe

Middle East

Other Africa

Russia Low Russia Base

South Asia

Algeria

China (Gas)

A typical U.S. producer is expected to have cash production costs of $180 per ton at $5/MMBtu natural gas

0
0 50 100 150 200 250

Million Product Tons

Current Producers Expanding Capacity


Existing and some new entrant producers currently plan to add nearly 6 million tons of new ammonia capacity in the next five years
(Thousand Tons per Year, Announced)
Company
Potash Corp. Coffeeville Resources Rentech Nitrogen Potash Corp. Agrium CF Industries CF Industries Koch

Location
Geismar, LA Coffeeville, KS Dubuque, IA Lima, OH Borger, TX Port Neal, IA Donaldsonville, LA Various

Products
Ammonia UAN Ammonia Ammonia, Urea

Start-up
Online Online 2014 2015

Capacity (000 t)
500 Ammonia 400 UAN 67 Ammonia

Notes
Restart/Debottleneck Upgrade Expansion/Debottleneck Debottleneck

Ammonia, Urea
Ammonia, Urea, UAN, DEF Ammonia, Urea, UAN, DEF Ammonia, Urea Ammonia, Urea, UAN, DEF Ammonia Ammonia Ammonia, Urea, UAN, DEF

2016 2016
2016 2016-2018 2017 2017 2017 2017

Iowa Fertilizer Co. (OCI) Weaver, IA

80 Ammonia 73 Urea 640 Ammonia 525 Urea 849 Ammonia 1.35 mil t Urea 1.25 mil t Ammonia 2.4 mil t various 1.0+ mil t Urea (Enid) 2.0 mil t various 850 Ammonia 1.5-2.0 mil t various
880 Ammonia 800 Ammonia 800 Ammonia 1,300 Urea (DEF)

Debottleneck Brownfield/Debottleneck
Brownfield/Debottleneck Debottleneck $1.3 billion, Greenfield Site at Cornerstone Chemical (formerly Cytec) Existing site Existing site

Dyno Nobel (IPL)


Mosaic Yara

Waggaman, LA
Faustina, LA Belle Plaine, SK

Source: Company announcements and industry publications

36

Greenfield Projects Face High Capital Costs


New entrants and some producers have proposed to add approximately another 7-8 million tons of new ammonia capacity in the next five years
(Thousand Tons per Year, Announced)
Company
U.S. Nitrogen/Austin Powder Dakota Gasification Ohio Valley Resources

Location
Greene County, TN Beulah, ND Rockport, IN

Products
Ammonia, AN

Start-up
2014

Capacity (000 t)
60 Ammonia 126 AN liquid

Notes
Ammonia upgraded to AN Brownfield at Synfuels Plant Greenfield $1.5 billion, greenfield Coal gasification, Greenfield Greenfield Greenfield Greenfield Debottleneck Greenfield

Ammonia, Urea
Ammonia, Urea, UAN, DEF Ammonia, Urea, UAN, DEF Ammonia, Urea Ammonia, Urea, UAN Ammonia, Urea Ammonia, Urea Urea Ammonia, Urea, UAN

2016
2016 2017 2017 2018 2018 -

360 Urea
800 Ammonia, 950 UAN, 90 DEF 800 Ammonia 1.0+ mil t various 700 Urea 770 Ammonia 1,600 Ammonia 2,500 Urea 2.0 mil t various 170 Urea 800 Ammonia, 380 Urea, 240 UAN

Northern Plains Nitrogen (North Western ND Dakota Corn Growers) Summit Power Group CHS KIT/IFFCO Canada JV Agrium Agrium Southeast Idaho Energy Texas Spiritwood, ND Becancour, QB TBD/Under Study Redwater, AB American Falls, ID

Source: Company announcements and industry publications

37

North America Relies on Nitrogen Imports


2012 Demand: 23.3 Million Nutrient Tons

Offshore imports account for 38% of total North American nitrogen demand, or 8.8 million of the 23.3 million nutrient tons consumed
In recent years, offshore imports accounted for 30% to 35% of North American ammonia use

Imports

Domestic Production

62%

38%

Offshore imports account for approximately 60% of urea fertilizer use


For UAN, offshore imports comprise approximately 25% of North American consumption

Imports: 8.8 Million Nutrient Tons


Ammonia Urea AN Other UAN

32%

53%

12%

Source: FERTECON Calendar Year

1% 2%

38

Growth in North American Nitrogen Capacity Expected


For planning purposes, CF Industries assumes North America will add around 6 million tons of new ammonia capacity between 2013 and 2018 This growth, if realized, represents a 32% increase in capacity from 2013 levels, with the majority expected to come onstream in 2016-2018 The additional nitrogen capacity is expected to be used largely for producing upgraded products Nitrogen fertilizer imports are expected to continue but the total should decline
North American Nitrogen Capacity and Demand Outlook
(Million Nutrient Tons)

30

25

Demand

20

15

10

Source: IFA, FERTECON, CF Calendar Year

39

North America Expected to Remain a Net Importer


North American Offshore Nitrogen Imports
(Million Nutrient Tons)

North American imports from offshore sources are expected to decline dramatically as new capacity comes onstream Imported ammonia would decline the least, falling about 20% The assumed volume of new urea capacity would displace about 60% of the current import volume UAN imports would decline by about 70%

10

Ammonia

Urea

UAN

AN

0 2010 2011 2012 2013F 2014F 2015F 2016F 2017F 2018F


Source: USDOC, CF Fertilizer Year

40

UAN Priced at a Premium


U.S. Gulf Prices, per Short Ton

Since January 2010, U.S. urea prices have averaged just over $400 per ton at the U.S. Gulf, while UAN prices have averaged close to $290 per ton Tampa ammonia prices have averaged $490 per ton since January 2010, while Midwest ammonia prices have averaged $650 per ton On a per unit nitrogen basis, UAN typically trades at a premium to other nitrogen sources Ammonia is typically the best value for farmers on a per unit nitrogen basis

Urea $800

UAN

Ammonia (Tampa)

$600

$400

$200

$0 Jan-10

Jul-10

Jan-11

Jul-11

Jan-12

Jul-12

Jan-13

U.S. Midwest Prices, per N Unit


$18 $15 $12 $9 $6 $3 Jan-10 Jul-10 Urea Ammonia UAN

Source: Green Markets

Jan-11 Jul-11

Jan-12 Jul-12

Jan-13

41

U.S. Phosphate Situation


U.S. Phosphate Prices

Domestic shipments are expected to reach 7.4 million tons of DAP/MAP product in 2013 as high corn acreage continues to drive stable phosphate demand However, greater competition in international market continues to weigh on the export market This is due to both higher supplies from Morocco and Saudi Arabia and recently lower demand in India due to decreasing subsidies U.S. exports have declined gradually from 11 million tons in 2004 to an estimated 5 million tons in 2013
42

(U.S. Dollars per Short Ton)

$650

NOLA

Tampa (Nola Equiv.)

$550

$450

$350 Jan-10

Jan-11

Jan-12

Jan-13

U.S. DAP/MAP Shipments


(Million Product Tons)

20 Exports 16 12 8 4 0 Domestic

Source: Green Markets, TFI, USDOC, CF Fertilizer Year

Agricultural and Nitrogen Themes


A $5 per bushel corn price is a sweet spot:

For the farmer For ethanol producers, feedlot operators and corn exporters For the fertilizer industry

World nitrogen demand is expected to continue at a consistent 2% growth

The global 2013 urea cost curve suggests strong support at $320-$340/st for US Gulf

Nitrogen capacity additions are not expected to have a material impact on the hypothetical margin available to North American producers

A tightly focused strategy well executed


43

Agenda

8:00am 8:20am 8:50am 9:20am 9:30am

Steve Wilson Doug Hoadley Phil Koch Break Bert Frost

Introduction Agriculture and Fertilizer Background Natural Gas and Logistics Sales and Market Development Operations and Capacity Expansion Financial Management Summary

10:00am Tony Will 10:30am Break 10:40am Dennis Kelleher 11:10am Steve Wilson 11:20am Q&A

A tightly focused strategy well executed


44

Natural Gas and Logistics

Phil Koch SVP, Supply Chain

A tightly focused strategy well executed


45

CF Industries Has Significant Cost and Logistical Advantages

CF Industries has a significant and enduring cost advantage from North American natural gas
The companys natural gas consumption to increase from 700 MCF / day to 1 BCF / day with capacity expansion projects Exploration, development and production companies have realized greater efficiencies, lowering the cost of gas Unique attributes of the North American natural gas environment help provide a sustainable cost advantage

CF Industries production, storage and distribution assets are competitive differentiators


Manufacturing flexibility and locations throughout North America Supply chain from raw material and natural gas procurement to transportation to distribution

Flexibility and nimbleness enable optimization of assets

46

Natural Gas Consumption Profile


MEDICINE HAT, AB
Consumption: 120,000 MMBtu/d Pricing Index: TransCanada/ Nova - AECO Average Basis: ($0.35)

COURTRIGHT, ON
Consumption: 40,000 MMBtu/d Pricing Index: Union Gas Pipeline Dawn Pool Average Basis: $0.35

Natural gas represents about 70% of cash cost of nitrogen production


CF Industries proximity to the largest producing basins in the U.S. yields attractive gas cost and supply flexibility

PORT NEAL, IA
Consumption: 40,000 MMBtu/d Expansion: 130,000 MMBtu/d Pricing Index: Northern Natural Gas- Ventura Average Basis: $0.05

VERDIGRIS, OK
Consumption: 120,000 MMBtu/d Pricing Index: Oneok Gas Transmission Average Basis: ($0.15)

WOODWARD, OK
Consumption: 57,000 MMBtu/d Pricing Index: Oneok Gas Transmission Average Basis: ($0.15)

YAZOO CITY, MS
Consumption: 40,000 MMBtu/d Pricing Index: Henry Hub

DONALDSONVILLE, LA
Consumption: 295,000 MMBtu/d Expansion: 430,000 MMBtu/d Pricing Index: Henry Hub

Note: Average basis is a trailing twelve month average and is the differential to Henry Hub excluding delivery cost.

47

Enduring Natural Gas Price Advantage

U.S. Lower 48-States Dry Gas Production


Bcf/day $/MMBtu

Contributors to the decline in North American natural gas prices:


Increase in North American shale gas reserves and production Greater drilling rig and well efficiencies Growing production of associated gas from liquids development

70 60

$10 $8 $6 $4 $2 $0 2007 2008 2009


Shale

50
40 30 20 10 0 2010 2011 2012
Conventional/Other Source: PIRA, EIA

Unique and sustainable advantages of North American natural gas


Abundant reserves Extensive geological data Land owner mineral rights Existing infrastructure for production and distribution Hydraulic fracturing expertise/innovation Abundant water resources Robust domestic market

Henry Hub Price (right hand scale)

$16

World Natural Gas Cost Outlook


(U.S. Dollars per MMBtu)

$12

West Europe

$8

Ukraine Russia

$4

U.S. Middle East

These advantages exist in few, if any, other parts of the world

$0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013F 2014F 2015F
Source: FERTECON, EIA, CME

48

Abundant Resources with Attractive Economics


Internal Rate of Return by Play

Source: BENTEK

The Potential Gas Committee estimates future U.S. supply of 2.7 quadrillion cubic feet (over 100 years), up 486 TCF from last report An immense amount of gas is economically recoverable for less than $5/MMBtu with todays technology

Technology and efficiency continue to advance rapidly in North America A culture and history of innovation Powerful competitive forces A supportive regulatory regime so far

49

Gas Cost Advantage Remains Despite Likely LNG Exports

Significant rents need to be paid on infrastructure investments associated with LNG Long permitting and infrastructure build-out period Pricing of gas from competing regions also impacts net-back pricing for North American gas producers High cost of liquefaction, shipping and regasification ensure a persistent advantage for North American gas users

Estimated Delivered Cost of LNG from U.S. Gulf


(U.S. Dollars per MMBtu)

$12.00 Fuel/Basis $10.00 $9.35 $0.60 $8.00 $1.25 Shipping $3.00 Persistent advantage for North American gas consumer $11.10 $0.60

$6.00

$3.00

Liquefaction

$3.00

$4.00 Gas Cost

$2.00

$-

Western Europe

Asia

Source: Cheniere Energy, based on $4.50 Henry Hub natural gas price and $100 Brent crude oil price.

50

More Gas from Fewer Rigs

Gas-directed rig count has tumbled, but production has remained strong

Rig Count

Production vs. Rig Count

Bcf/day

2,000 66 1,500 62 1,000 58

5% increase in production despite 50% reduction in gas directed rig count since September 2011
Newer plays have high initial production rates

500

Gas Directed Rig Count Total Land Rigs (Gas+Oil) Production (r axis)

0 2010

54 2011 2012 2013

Drilling has become much more efficient

Source: EIA, Baker Hughes

Days

Southwestern Energy Fayetteville Shale Drilling Performance


Drill Time (Days)

Thousand Feet

15

5.5
Lateral Length (000 feet, r axis)

Significant reduction in drill time despite longer lateral distance Multiple holes per pad, often accessing multiple reservoirs

12 9

5.0
4.5

6 3 0 2009 2010 2011 2012


Source: Southwestern Energy

4.0 3.5

51

Market Forces Drive North American Natural Gas Toward Range Trading

Market forces tend to drive gas prices toward range-bound trading When prices fall, electricity producers substitute natural gas for coal generation, reducing gas stockpiles

Henry Hub Cash Price


(U.S. Dollars per MMBtu)

$5.00 Downward price pressure from supply response as prices remain above marginal cost of new production

$4.50

$4.00

$3.50

When prices rise above marginal cost of new production basin by basin, supply is expected to increase
Many gas producers have chosen to hedge in the $4.50 to $5.00 range CF Industries expects natural gas to trade between $3 - $5 / MMBtu over the next several years

$3.00

$2.50

$2.00

Upward demand pressure from coal-togas switching for electricity generation

$1.50

Source: Bloomberg

52

Unique Asset Base Creates Competitive Advantage

CF Industries extensive asset base creates distinct business advantage Nitrogen production in the heart of the Corn Belt Flexible product configuration to take advantage of evolving product prices and profit opportunities Extensive ammonia terminal network near customers facilitates quick delivery during short application windows Multiple transportation modes for flexible methods of getting products to customers

Seven Nitrogen Complexes

Flexible Product Configuration

Maximize Margin

Broad Terminal System

Multiple Transportation Modes

53

Production Flexibility
Nitrogen Demand and Production Capacity*

Unparalleled breadth of plant locations and production flexibility Immediate proximity to high-demand regions Production flexibility to address changing market conditions
Optimize mix of UAN and urea Increase net ammonia when/if conditions appropriate

MEDICINE HAT, AB
Net Ammonia: 790 Urea: 810

COURTRIGHT, ON
Net Ammonia: 265 UAN: 345 Urea: 160

PORT NEAL, IA
Net Ammonia: 30 UAN: 800 Urea: 50

VERDIGRIS, OK
Net Ammonia: 30 UAN: 1,965

YAZOO CITY, MS
UAN: 160 Urea: 20 AN: 1,075

WOODWARD, OK
Net Ammonia: 140 UAN: 820 Urea: 25

DONALDSONVILLE, LA
Net Ammonia: 1,010 UAN: 2,415 Urea: 1,680

PLANT CITY, FL
DAP/MAP: 2,165

Legend (Thousand Nutrient Tons)


*Thousand Product Tons 0 1,100
Source: AAPFCO, CF

54

Broad Network of Terminal Facilities

Significant inventory holding capacity

Nitrogen Demand and Terminal Facilities

29 ammonia facilities 1.2 million ton capacity 57 UAN facilities 1.2 million ton capacity

Critical to providing inmarket and in-season product availability


Product distribution in close proximity to customers Inventory availability during peak seasonal demand Investments to increase loading capabilities = more inventory turns

Production Distribution
Legend (Thousand Nutrient Tons)
0 1,100
Source: AAPFCO, CF

55

Value of Access to Ammonia Pipelines

Lowest cost method of ammonia distribution


Nitrogen Demand and Ammonia Pipelines

NuStar and Magellan Connected to 10 distribution facilities

Provide ability to move product around choke points and optimize distribution methods
Moving ammonia from plant locations to river-terminals Cross-loading to river barges for northern destinations

Production Distribution Pipeline


Legend (Thousand Nutrient Tons)
0 1,100
Source: AAPFCO, CF

56

Significant Product Volumes Moved via River System

Utilization of multiple inland waterways to reach end-markets

Nitrogen Demand and River System

Mississippi, Ohio, Illinois, Arkansas, Yazoo Rivers

Product transportation and inventory holding capacity


Ammonia 12 barges with 31,000 ton total capacity UAN 20 barges with 60,000 ton total capacity 1 chartered ocean UAN vessel 1 contracted ocean vessel for dry product

Production

Distribution
Rivers
Legend (Thousand Nutrient Tons)
0 1,100
Source: AAPFCO, CF

57

Range of Options Provided By Rail Access and Assets


Fleet of over 5,000 cars

Established relationships with all Class 1 railroads


Donaldsonville Union Pacific Yazoo City Canadian National Verdigris BNSF Woodward BNSF Port Neal Union Pacific Courtright CN & CSX Medicine Hat CP Plant City CSX

Rail Fleet by Car Type


553

Other 11%
909

1,361

Provides options to move any product to any domestic location

Hopper 17%

Ammonia 26%

UAN 46%
58

2,432

Natural Gas and Logistics


Unique attributes of the North American natural gas environment provide a sustainable natural gas price range of $3 - $5 / MMBtu

CF Industries plant and distribution facilities are located in the heart of the Corn Belt, providing exceptional access to customers

CF Industries asset base and management approach provide a high degree of flexibility which helps maximize earnings opportunities

A tightly focused strategy well executed


59

Agenda

8:00am 8:20am 8:50am 9:20am 9:30am

Steve Wilson Doug Hoadley Phil Koch Break Bert Frost

Introduction Agriculture and Fertilizer Background Natural Gas and Logistics Sales and Market Development Operations and Capacity Expansion Financial Management Summary

10:00am Tony Will 10:30am Break 10:40am Dennis Kelleher 11:10am Steve Wilson 11:20am Q&A

A tightly focused strategy well executed


60

Sales and Market Development

Bert Frost SVP, Sales and Market Development

A tightly focused strategy well executed


61

Decision Making with a World View


2012 World Nitrogen Net Trade
(Million Nutrient Tonnes)

12.4 -7.0 -5.1 4.4 8.5 0.5 -7.6 -1.5 -3.7

-0.9

Net Importer Net Exporter Source: FERTECON, CF

Factors include major agricultural growing regions, fertilizer supply and demand, logistics, currencies, geopolitical issues
62

Fertilizer Value Chain


Revenue Available in Value Chain*

(U.S. Dollars per Ton)

Conversion of natural gas feedstock into plant nutrients creates value for nitrogen fertilizer manufacturers Manufacturers (who have the biggest investment) have captured the largest share of available revenue in the fertilizer value chain during recent years Margins for nitrogen manufacturers have benefitted from historically high nitrogen prices and low natural gas costs

$800 to Retailer $700 $600 $500 $400 $300 to Wholesaler to Manufacturer

$200 $100 $0 Ammonia Urea UAN

* Estimated three year average weighted for seasonal patterns Source: CF, Green Markets, USDA

63

Maximizing Profitability

Market based approach through response to global agricultural and fertilizer developments Maximizing profitability through flexibility

Optimization through Flexibility

Production Mix

Production mix: urea vs. UAN, DAP vs. MAP, urea liquor vs. DEF Markets: domestic vs. export, agricultural vs. industrial Logistics and transportation: numerous production and distribution sources and modes of delivery Pricing: various options with forward, index, block and cash prices Order book: management of product volumes offered during specific timeframes

Order Book Management


Maximize Margin

Markets

Pricing Options

Logistics & Transportation

64

Sales Overview

Diverse sales mix


15 million product tons UAN is highest volume product

7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000

2012 Sales Volume by Product


(Thousand Product Tons)
Ammonia

Seasonal mix changes based on market balance and pricing

Nitrogen represents more than 85% percent of total sales


North American-centric nitrogen sales
Phosphate export opportunities to maximize net-backs

1,000 0

Market Segmentation
14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000
(Thousand Product Tons)

Primary focus on agricultural sales


Highest margin sales opportunities
Improved profitability of industrial sales since Terra acquisition

Balance with industrial sales


Ratable business
Sizable volumes help base load production

2,000
0
Agriculture Industrial Export

Source: DOC, TFI, CF

65

Ammonia Application Period is Compressing Days to Ship 66% of Total Fall Shipments
Days

30

With technological advances and larger, faster equipment, peak day ammonia volume is increasing and peak shipping period is trending down 24 hour operation in-season is more important than ever Improvements in ammonia terminal loading capacity have been made and more are planned

25
20 15 10 5

Trend

0 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011


Index

Highest Single Day Shipments

500 400 300 200 100

Trend

0
1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011
Fall: October November at Central Illinois Ammonia Terminals Index: Fall 2000 = 100

Source: CF

66

Value of Ammonia Distribution System

% of Total Ammonia Volume

Increasing Terminal Sales


Terminals Other

Ammonia terminals create significant value with close proximity to agricultural markets

100%

75%

50%

21 in-market ammonia terminals with 790,000 tons of storage to supply peak demand in both fall and spring

25%

0%
2009* 2010* 2011 2012

Terminal sales yield a price premium relative to the U.S. Gulf due to in-market storage and logistics advantage which ensures just-in-time delivery to the customer

* Pro forma: CF plus Terra Legacy sales Source: CF

U.S. Dollars per Ton Ammonia

Valuable Additional Margin at Midwest Terminals vs. Gulf

$150

$100

Average

The additional margin for an ammonia sale at a Midwest terminal vs. a Gulf sale has averaged an estimated $81 per ton

$50

$0 2009 2010 2011 2012

* Pro forma margin based on average Green Market prices Source: Green Markets, CF

67

Export Sales
CF Industries Exports
(Thousand Tons)

Unique ability via Donaldsonville and Tampa to arbitrage the best geographic sales opportunities

1,600
Phosphate Nitrogen

1,400 1,200 1,000

Vessel logistics favorable to growing markets in Central and South America

Exports provide flexibility and diversify customer base


Nitrogen (mainly UAN) and phosphate are exported KEYTRADE partnership provides access to global markets for exports

800

600

400 200 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Source: CF

68

Global Reach

Canada

France Turkey Bangladesh India Pakistan China Vietnam

Mexico Costa Rica Guatemala Honduras Nicaragua Panama

North American Manufacturing 50%-Owned Offshore Operations Global Distribution

Argentina Brazil Chile Colombia Ecuador Peru Uruguay Venezuela

Ivory Coast Senegal Kenya South Africa Tanzania

Europe Asia Asia North America Africa

South America

Exports through KEYTRADE in 2012

2009 - 2012 export locations shown

KEYTRADE partnership provides access and visibility to global markets


69

Industrial Business

Industrial chemicals
Chemical intermediates

Industrial Sales Volume by Product

Ethanol producers
Explosives producers Cattle feed Other Nitrogen 32% Ammonia 38%

Environmental
Reduction in NOx emissions at stationary power plants

Diesel Exhaust Fluid (DEF)


Growing market for liquid urea used to reduce NOx emissions from diesel engines AN 23%

Urea 7%

1.8 million tons in 2012

70

Evolution of DEF Market in North America

Diesel exhaust fluid (DEF) currently represents ~ 2% of the North American urea market Expected to reach ~1.5 million tons of urea equivalent, or 8% of the North American urea market, by 2020 EPA-mandated NOx reduction
Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) technology has been adopted by all U.S. heavy duty truck manufacturers

DEF Use for Buses, Class 4 through 8 Trucks & Off-Road Vehicles
(Equivalent Tons of Urea in Millions) 1.6 1.4

1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

CF Industries positioned to lead


Largest U.S. based provider Domestic production preferred due to quality requirements and shipping costs

Source: Integer

71

Product Pricing Process

In-depth agribusiness analysis of agricultural and fertilizer-specific market trends

Crop market factors

Global fertilizer supply/demand

Frequent management discussion and evaluation of near-term industry developments and market/pricing trends

International/national/regional Agricultural/industrial Weekly/monthly/quarterly meetings


45%

Continuous assessment of spot market price versus future expectations Array of price offerings to enable customers to manage price risks:

Forward Index Block Cash

72

Sales and Support

One stop source for nitrogen and phosphate products Flexibility and scale

In-market production and supply Ability to adjust production to match changing market conditions 45%

Market insight through team dedicated to agri-business analysis State-of-the-art customer service through e-business process and performance management Innovative pricing options help customers manage future price risk when buying fertilizer

73

Product and Process Innovation

New sulfur enhanced phosphate (MAPpluSTM)

Supplies crops with sulfate for immediate plant use and elemental sulfur for season-long fertilization
Among easiest-to-handle enhanced fertilizers available on the market

Export opportunities in Latin America


45%

Expanded features through new PROMISESM e-business portal


Increased automation Enhanced communication Ease of use

Implemented new ERP system in early 2013

Streamlines business processes and provides infrastructure to support future growth

74

UAN Market Development

North America and Europe largest UAN markets with 90% of global demand Sizable exports of UAN to mature markets like France and Belgium
United States Mexico

UAN Markets

UK France Belgium

China

Actively developing new markets Latin America, Australia and China


Deep water dock at Donaldsonville positioned to load large vessels of UAN to supply markets worldwide
Argentina Peru Colombia Australia

Source: FERTECON, CF

75

UAN Market Development


Argentina UAN Market
(Thousand Tonnes)

800

Latin America is a key market logistically advantaged to the U.S.

Production

Imports

Consumption

600

Growing demand for nutrients in Argentina and an expanding agricultural sector led to adoption of UAN in the late 1990s There is excellent growth potential in Brazil as the crop mix of maize and sugar cane is ideal for UAN application

400

200

0 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010


Source: FERTECON

Nitrogen Application Rates*


(Pounds per Acre) 200
150 100 50 0 Maize Wheat Cotton Sugar Soy
* Most recent data: 2008 Source: IFA, CF

CF Industries is exploring ways to build UAN demand in Latin America and other developing markets

Brazil

U.S.

76

Sales and Market Development

Strong agricultural and fertilizer fundamentals continue to create value for nitrogen fertilizer manufacturers

CF Industries is well positioned in the plant nutrient market with a diverse sales mix and significant North American and international sales opportunities
CF Industries manages its business, sales and market development decisions from a global perspective with a relentless focus on maximizing margins CF Industries is developing product markets in new regions that the company can serve as its additional capacity comes on-line

A tightly focused strategy well executed


77

Agenda

8:00am 8:20am 8:50am 9:20am 9:30am 10:00am 10:30am 10:40am 11:10am 11:20am

Steve Wilson Doug Hoadley Phil Koch Break Bert Frost Tony Will Break Dennis Kelleher Steve Wilson Q&A

Introduction Agriculture and Fertilizer Background Natural Gas and Logistics Sales and Market Development Operations and Capacity Expansion Financial Management Summary

A tightly focused strategy well executed


78

Operations and Capacity Expansion

Tony Will SVP, Manufacturing and Distribution

A tightly focused strategy well executed


79

Operating Philosophy

Annual Recordable Incidence Rates


Incident Rate (Recordable incidents/ 200,000 hours)

Core focus on safety and environmental stewardship

3.00 2.50

CF RIR

TFI RIR

2.47

2.35 1.70 1.80 1.53 1.10 1.80

OSHA recordable incident rate better than industry average

2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50

1.80

Operate a diverse set of assets with a strict regulatory and environmental permit compliance program

0.00

2010

2011

2012

2013 YTD

High on-stream factor enabled by a robust maintenance program

Source: TFI, CF Industries

D.A.R.T. Rate*
2.0 1.6
Industry Average D.A.R.T. Rate (1) CF D.A.R.T. Rate

Investments in existing plants to increase production capacity and energy efficiency

1.2 0.8

0.4
0.0

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred (D.A.R.T.) Rate per 200,00 hours: Includes cases involving days away from work, restricted work activity, or transfers to another job. (1) Average for Phosphate Rock Mining (NAICS 212392), Nitrogen Plants (NAICS 325311), Phosphoric Plants (NAICS 325312) and Farm Supply Merchant Wholesalers (NAICS 424910). Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, CF

80

Operating Efficiency
110%

Ammonia Operating Rates


(% of Capacity Utilization) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 2010 2010 2010 2010 2011 2011 2011 2011 2012 2012 2012 2012 2013

High capacity utilization enabled by robust maintenance program and operating philosophy Regularly scheduled turnaround projects maintain safe operating condition and increase plant efficiency Increased production capacity through efficiency and debottleneck projects

Thousand Tons per Year

Donaldsonville Ammonia Annual Capacity and Gas Usage for Complex II


Capacity Gas Usage 1,236 1,100 1,010 940 1,040 MMBtu per Ton

1,300 1,200 1,100 1,000 900

35.0 34.7 34.3 34.0 33.7

300,000 tons ammonia from 2010 through 2013 (1) 20,000 tons UAN since 2010

800
700 600 500 400 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012

33.3
33.0 32.7 32.3 32.0
Source: CF Note: Complex II includes ammonia units #3 and #4 at Donaldsonville

(1) Includes approximately 150,000 tons from debottleneck projects in 2013.

81

Nitrogen Production System


(Thousand Short Tons)

Current Annual Capacity


Location Donaldsonville, Louisiana Medicine Hat, Alberta Verdigris, Oklahoma Yazoo City, Mississippi Courtright, Ontario Woodward, Oklahoma Port Neal, Iowa Gross Ammonia 2,950 1,250 1,130 560 500 480 380 7,250 Unconsolidated Affiliates (3) Point Lisas, Trinidad Billingham, U.K. - GrowHow Ince, U.K. - GrowHow Total Net Ammonia 1,010 790 345 0 265 140 30 2,580 UAN (32%) Net Urea 2,415 1,680 0 810 1,965 0 160 20 345 160 820 25 800 50 6,505 2,745
(2)

(1)

Ammonium Nitrate 0 0 0 1,075 0 0 0 1,075

Fertilizer Compounds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Products 5,105 1,600 2,310 1,255 770 985 880 12,905

360 275 190 8,075

360 135 0 3,075

0 0 0 6,505

0 0 0 2,745

0 310 330 1,715

0 0 165 165

360 445 495 14,205

Notes (1) 2012 Form 10-K, average annual capacity includes allowance for normal outages and planned maintenance shutdowns.
(2) (3)

Includes granular urea, urea liquor (UL), and Diesel Exhaust Fluid (DEF). Represents CF's 50% interest in the capacity of each of these facilities.

82

World Scale Phosphate Operations


Fully integrated system 1 million tons of P2O5 production annually

2 million tons DAP / MAP

Well-balanced operations (rock / beneficiation / chemical plant capacity)

12 years of fully permitted rock reserves

One of three draglines at the Hardee Phosphate Complex

In process to increase rock reserves by 10 years

Excellent location to serve domestic and export markets CF Industries advantaged vs. nonintegrated producers
Reclamation area post mining activities

83

Critical Factors Supporting Decision to Invest in New Nitrogen Capacity


Strong and growing nitrogen market
Fundamentals expected to sustain 2% average growth rate requiring about 5 new urea plants per year Global market with pricing determined by production from much higher cost regions North America large net importer of nitrogen

Reliable source of low cost natural gas feedstock


2.7 quadrillion cubic feet of expected future U.S. supply North America has worlds most developed natural gas production and distribution infrastructure Structural elements support long-term natural gas cost advantage versus many other regions

Lowest delivered cost, broadest reach


Largest nitrogen manufacturer in North America Largest manufacturing and distribution footprint Best logistics infrastructure Number of ship-from points minimizes transportation cost Multiple deep-draft docks at Donaldsonville allow for export of nitrogen products if desired

84

Critical Factors Supporting Decision to Invest in New Nitrogen Capacity, contd


Best capabilities
Outstanding sales and marketing team - well positioned to sell additional tons Sharing of best practices and cross training among 2,200 operating employees in multiple locations Able to pool/share spare parts

CF Industries expansion projects will be among the first new capacity in North America to come online
Spent or committed $500 million as of March 31, 2013 Air permits in public comment phase at both locations Long-lead-time equipment (rotating and high-pressure equipment) for both ammonia plants, both urea plants and the nitric acid plant have been ordered Expect to begin moving earth/constructing later this summer Projects expected to come online in 2015-2016

Attractive economics with expected returns significantly above the companys cost of capital
85

Capacity Expansion Projects


Expansion Projects Capacities and Typical Product Mix

Authorized expenditure of $3.8 billion


$2.1 billion at Donaldsonville $1.7 billion at Port Neal

Tons per Day

Annual Capacity
(thousand tons)

Typical Product Mix


(thousand tons)

Donaldsonville, LA - Ammonia 3,640 1,274 184

Combined annual production:


2.1 million tons of gross ammonia 2.0 2.7 million tons of urea Up to 1.8 million(1) tons of UAN

- Urea
- Nitric Acid - UAN Port Neal, IA - Ammonia - Urea

3,850
1,675 5,050

1,348
586 1,768

686
-1,768(1)

Contracted ThyssenKrupp Uhde for procurement and engineering services Draft air permits out for public comment in Louisiana and Iowa

2,425 3,850

849 1,348

81 1,348

(1) At 1.8M tons of UAN, 2.0M tons of granular urea can be produced. Granular urea production could be increased by decreasing UAN production.

Notes: All production volume shown as short tons. Production volume based on 350 operating days a year

86

Donaldsonville 2016 Worlds Largest Nitrogen Complex


Six ammonia plants Five urea plants Three UAN plants Five docks
Two deep water docks for ocean vessel loading Three floating docks for loading river barges
9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000

Donaldsonville Ammonia, Urea and UAN for Sale


(Thousands of Product Tons per Year)

2,000
1,000 Gran Urea UAN Net Ammonia 1UAN Max 2,248 4,349 1,320 2 2,336 4,228 1,320 3 2,378 4,168 1,320
Net Ammonia

Unit train capability NuStar ammonia pipeline Five natural gas pipelines

4 2,540 3,900 1,320


UAN

5 2,698 3,430 1,416


Gran Urea

6 2,812 3,095 1,484

7Urea Max 3,039 2,413 1,641

Donaldsonville will have unmatched product upgrade flexibility

Donaldsonville project will increase UAN and urea product mix flexibility in a cost-advantaged location to serve domestic and international markets
87

Port Neal 2016 Expanded Capacity in Heart of the Corn Belt


Average Annual Capacity
(Thousand Tons)

Two ammonia plants Three urea plants Two nitric acid plants One UAN plant Unit train capability

2012

2016

Increase

Gross Ammonia
UAN Urea

380
800 50

1,229
800 1,398

849
1,348

A tightly focused strategy well executed


Additional urea capacity in a region with significant demand
88

Operations and Capacity Expansion


CF Industries is a world-class fertilizer producer with a core focus on safe and environmentally responsible operations CF Industries maintains high capacity utilization through robust maintenance program and capital projects to increase production volumes and improve energy efficiency CF Industries is expanding nitrogen capacity with an attractive return profile based on strong market fundamentals and best existing set of assets and capabilities New production at Donaldsonville will increase product mix flexibility in a cost-advantaged location to serve domestic and international markets, and at Port Neal will add urea capacity in a region with significant demand

A tightly focused strategy well executed


89

Agenda

8:00am 8:20am 8:50am 9:20am 9:30am 10:00am 10:30am 10:40am 11:10am 11:20am

Steve Wilson Doug Hoadley Phil Koch Break Bert Frost Tony Will Break Dennis Kelleher Steve Wilson Q&A

Introduction Agriculture and Fertilizer Background Natural Gas and Logistics Sales and Market Development Operations and Capacity Expansion Financial Management Summary

A tightly focused strategy well executed


90

Financial Management

Dennis Kelleher Chief Financial Officer

A tightly focused strategy well executed


91

CF Industries Effective Financial Management

Delivered first quarter record net earnings and EPS


Earnings of $407 million Earnings per diluted share of $6.47

Solid fundamentals and operational excellence


Strong planting despite challenging weather Favorable ammonia and UAN price realizations First quarter record UAN shipments

Strong credit profile and flexible balance sheet


Investment grade credit ratings from each agency Utilization of balance sheet through $1.5 billion of new bonds

Execution of capital allocation plans

Returned $2.25 billion of cash to shareholders through repurchases since 2011 Closed acquisition of CFL interests Continued investments in capacity expansion projects ($500 million as of March 31, 2013)

Key value drivers support earnings profile


Feedstock, ammonia storage, transportation and production efficiency advantages Business model supports higher highs and higher lows

Significantly outperforming peers, yet trading at a discount

92

Strong Balance Sheet to Fund Strategic Priorities


1.2x

Free Cash Flow / Total Debt (1)(3)


1.0x 0.9x

CF Industries has a solid investment grade credit profile


1.0x 0.8x 0.6x 0.4x 0.4x

Modest leverage ratios Strong fixed charge coverage ratios

0.5x

Commitment to maintain investment grade metrics

0.2x 0.0x

Recent issuance of $1.5 billion of long-term bonds


2010

2011

2012

LTM (2)

$750 million of 3.45% notes due 2023 $750 million of 4.95% notes due 2043

2.0x 1.7x 1.6x

Total Debt / EBITDA(2)(3)

1.2x 0.9x
0.8x 0.5x 0.4x 0.0x 2010
(1) (2) (3) See slide 111 for definition of free cash flow. LTM includes CF Industries $1.5B debt from May 20, 2013. See slides 110-111 for reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures

0.5x

2011

2012

LTM

(2)

93

History of Share Repurchases

$2.75 billion of cash returned to shareholders through repurchase of 21.9 million shares at an average price of $126/share

$300

$250
~$164 Average Price

Significant value accretion to remaining shareholders Programs completed well ahead of schedule
$200
~$153 Average Price

~$197 Average Price

Complete existing $3 billion program


$150

$2.25 billion remaining authorization as of April 30, 2013 Significant cash flow and available liquidity to fund repurchases
$100
~$59 Average Price

$1.0B

$500M

Closed C$910 million acquisition of CFL interests on April 30, 2013 $500 million spent or committed to capacity expansion projects as of March 31, 2013

$0 1/2/2008

1/2/2009

$500M

Executed share repurchases while investing in growth projects

$50

1/2/2010

1/2/2011

1/2/2012

1/2/2013

94

$750M

Capital Allocation Impact

Increased nitrogen volume over 150% since 2010

CF Industries Nitrogen Volumes and Shares Outstanding


Million Nutrient Tons Million Shares Outstanding April 30, 2010

9
8

1.7

8.5

72.0

Projects approved in 2012 and underway will lead to total nitrogen volume increase of 225% since 2010

Share Count 7

3.6
6 5

0.1
Jan. 31, 2013

0.3

6.6

0.1

65.5

April 30, 2013

59.0

Share repurchase activity has reduced share count 17% since Terra acquisition

3 2 1

2.6
52.5

Jan. 29, 2010

Remaining share repurchase authorization of $2.25 billion as of April 30, 2013

0 2010 PreTerra Previously 34% CFL (2) Terra Acquisition Executed Acquisition (1) Debottlenecks Current Planned New Plants Debottlenecks (4) (3) Total 2016

46.0

(1) Excludes 34% of Canadian Fertilizers Limited (CFL) that was owned by Viterra. CFL operations were treated as a consolidated variable interest entity in CF Industries Holdings, Inc. financial statements. (2) Acquisition of all outstanding interests in CFL closed April 30, 2013. (3) Approved ammonia debottleneck projects that are in process. (4) New plant construction projects.

95

Key Value Drivers


Enduring feedstock cost advantage
Lower, less volatile natural gas prices Significant cost advantage to Chinese coal-based nitrogen production, Eastern European gas-based nitrogen production U.S. shale gas evolution difficult to replicate at scale elsewhere

Ammonia storage advantage


Storage terminals provide opportunity to realize both seasonal and regional price differences Allows CF Industries to maximize higher-margin agricultural sales and provides flexibility to negotiate better industrial sales

Transportation cost advantage


Facilities located near or in worlds most productive corn growing region Significant landed-cost differential versus imports and low-cost inland transportation options Transportation advantage exists for potential exports from Donaldsonville to Central and South American locations

Production efficiency advantage


High capacity utilization rates

Attractive investments in debottlenecking

Integrated phosphate advantage versus non-integrated producers


96

Robust Business Profile


Sensitivity of 2012 Nitrogen Segment Cash Operating Earnings to Gas and Urea Prices
(Billions of U.S. Dollars)

The fundamentals of global nitrogen product pricing and North American natural gas costs give CF Industries an attractive earnings profile
Urea Price ($/ton)

Natural Gas Cost ($/MMBtu) $3.00 $300 $325 $350 $375 $400 $425 $450 $475 $500
$1.5 $1.9 $2.2 $2.5 $2.8 $3.1 $3.5 $3.8 $4.1

$3.50
$1.4 $1.7 $2.1 $2.4 $2.7 $3.0 $3.3 $3.7 $4.0

$4.00
$1.3 $1.6 $1.9 $2.3 $2.6 $2.9 $3.2 $3.5 $3.8

$4.50
$1.2 $1.5 $1.8 $2.1 $2.4 $2.8 $3.1 $3.4 $3.7

$5.00
$1.0 $1.4 $1.7 $2.0 $2.3 $2.6 $3.0 $3.3 $3.6

The companys existing nitrogen business profile can be highly profitable across a broad range of industry conditions This analysis provides confidence for the new investments in nitrogen capacity

Source: CF Note: Based on 2012 actual nitrogen segment gross margins plus DD&A. Assumes that a $25 per ton change in urea price is equivalent to a $17.39 per ton change in UAN price and a $44.57 per ton change in ammonia price.

Higher Highs, Higher Lows


97

Excellent Execution
Gross Margin as % of Sales
60% 50% 40% 32 30% 20% 10% 0% 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 LTM LTM LTM LTM LTM 47 51 52 49 43 43 60% 50% 40% 32 28 28 49 45 45

EBITDA as % of Sales (1)


54 55 55

28 27 27

22

25

30% 21 20% 10% 0% 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 17 16 16

27 28 23 20 20

2012

2011

2012

2011

2012 Yara 22 2012 Yara

LTM

LTM

LTM

LTM

CF Industries

Agrium

Mosaic

PotashCorp

Yara

(3) CF Industries

Agrium

Mosaic

PotashCorp

Return on Invested Capital (2)


40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 LTM LTM LTM LTM LTM (3) CF Industries
(1) (2) (3)

Return on Equity (2)


45% 40% 35% 34 33 39

34 34 34

31
27 21 22 21 21 14 15 21 21 19

23
19 14 14 22 14 13 17

30% 25%

15 15

14 14

20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011

2012

2011

LTM

LTM

LTM

LTM

Agrium

Mosaic

PotashCorp

Yara

(3) CF Industries

Agrium

Mosaic

PotashCorp

Calculated using Agrium, Yara and PotashCorp. self-reported EBITDA. Mosaic EBITDA calculated from its reported financials, consistent with the methodology used for CF Industries as described on slide 110. See slide 111 for a definition of invested capital, Return on Invested Capital and Return on Equity. See slides 110-111 for reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures.

98

LTM

LTM

Accessing Low-Cost Debt


2.0x

Total Debt to EBITDA(1)(2)


1.8 1.5

1.6x

Increased utilization of CF Industries borrowing capacity through $1.5 billion bond issuance Balance sheet efficiency and leverage consistent with peers

1.2x 0.9 0.8x 0.5 0.5 0.4x 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.9 0.9

1.1 1.1

0.6 0.6 0.6

0.0x 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 Yara 2012 Yara LTM LTM LTM LTM

(3) CF Industries

Agrium (3)

Mosaic

PotashCorp

Total Debt to Equity Market Value(2)


40%

Movement toward more leverage demonstrates belief in sustainable nature of fertilizer industry economics

34 30% 27 22 20% 18 17 13 10% 7 13 12 12 4 13 14 27

0% 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 LTM LTM LTM LTM (3) CF Industries (3) LTM

Agrium

Mosaic

PotashCorp

(1) Calculated using Agrium, Yara and PotashCorp. self-reported EBITDA. Mosaic EBITDA calculated from its reported financials, consistent with the methodology used for CF Industries as described on slide 110. (2) See slides 110-111 for definition of total debt to EBITDA and total debt to equity market value. (3) LTM includes CF ($1.5B) and AGU ($1B) debt from May 20, 2013 and May 28, 2013, respectively. Note: See slides 110-111 for reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures.

99

LTM

Cash Returned to Shareholders


Dividends & Share Repurchases as % of Equity Market Value (1)
10% 8% 9 7 6 6%

$218 million of dividends since 2010 $2.25 billion of share repurchases since 2011 $2.25 billion remaining on 2012 ($3.0 billion) authorization as of April 30, 2013 Recognized for effectiveness of share repurchase program

4
4% 2% 0% LTM LTM LTM LTM 3 Yr Avrg. 3 Yr Avrg. 3 Yr Avrg. 3 Yr Avrg. 3 Yr Avrg. 14 3 Yr Avrg. LTM 19 16 13 LTM 3 3 2 2 3 2

(3)

CF Industries

Agrium

Mosaic

PotashCorp

Yara

Dividends & Share Repurchases as % of EBITDA (2)


50%

40
40% 30% 20% 10% 34 23 24 24

16

3 Yr Avrg.

3 Yr Avrg.

3 Yr Avrg.

(3)

CF Industries
(1) (2) (3)

Agrium

Mosaic

3 Yr Avrg.

A tightly focused strategy well executed

0% LTM LTM LTM LTM

PotashCorp

Yara

See slide 110 for a definition of Equity Market Value. Calculated using Agrium, Yara and PotashCorp. self-reported EBITDA. Mosaic EBITDA calculated from its reported financials, consistent with the methodology used for CF Industries as described on slide 110. See slides 110-111 for reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures.

100

Outperforming Peers Yet Trading at a Discount


Share Price Performance (1/1/2009 3/31/2013)
CF +255% 350% AGU +168% MOS +62% POT +52% YAR +64%

300%

Enterprise Value / EBITDA(1)

250%

CF Industries

3.3x

200%

Agrium
Mosaic

6.7x
7.9x 10.0x 4.3x

150%

Potash Corp.
100%

Yara

50%

0% 1/2/2009 -50%

1/2/2010

1/2/2011

1/2/2012

1/2/2013

(1) EV/ LTM EBITDA as of 3/31/2013. See slide 110 for calculation. See footnote 1 on slide 110 regarding EBITDA.

101

Financial Management
Solid fundamentals, effective management and operational excellence as demonstrated through record earnings

Strong cash flow supports an investment grade credit profile and flexible balance sheet, and enables execution of capital allocation plans

Key value drivers support an attractive earnings profile that demonstrates higher highs and higher lows

Industry-leading execution, balance sheet utilization and cash returns to shareholders have provided exceptional stock price appreciation

A tightly focused strategy well executed


102

Agenda

8:00am 8:20am 8:50am 9:20am 9:30am 10:00am 10:30am 10:40am 11:10am 11:20am

Steve Wilson Doug Hoadley Phil Koch Break Bert Frost Tony Will Break Dennis Kelleher Steve Wilson Q&A

Introduction Agriculture and Fertilizer Background Natural Gas and Logistics Sales and Market Development Operations and Capacity Expansion Financial Management Summary

A tightly focused strategy well executed


103

Summary

Steve Wilson Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

A tightly focused strategy well executed


104

Investment Thesis
Strategy Tightly Focused On Core Strength As a Nitrogen and Phosphate Producer

Long-Term Industry Growth Favorable Industry Environment

Demand growth underpinned by population growth, higher protein diets Search for higher yields leads to consistent consumption

North America (Canada and the U.S.) imports almost 40% of its nitrogen needs

Long-term North American natural gas costs estimated to be $3-$5/MMBtu


Significant offshore capacity operates at the high end of the cost curve Positioned to serve the worlds largest and most productive corn growing area

Operational Advantages

Extensive North American production and distribution footprint


Transportation assets provide logistical flexibility Peer-leading financial performance Disciplined capital allocation decisions Experienced talented management team

Excellent Execution

105

History of Value Creation

Management track record of bold and disciplined actions


2005: Initial Public Offering at $16/Share 2008: Announced and completed $500M share repurchase program 2009: Bid for Terra Industries 2010: Closed Terra Industries acquisition 2011: Expenditure of $1B for share repurchase program 2012: Expenditure of $500M to complete $1.5B share repurchase program; Announced C$0.9B agreement to purchase outstanding interests in CFL; Authorized new $3B share repurchase program; Announced $3.8B capacity expansion project 2013: Expenditure of $750M for share repurchases under the $3B authorization (as of April 30); Completed acquisition of all outstanding interests in CFL

Tightly focused strategy based on thorough study and analysis

Disciplined decisions based on rigorous DCF analysis and stress testing


Effective execution demonstrated by financial results and share price performance

CF Industries shareholders have been rewarded by managements disciplined strategic decisions


106

Summary

CF Industries has posted record earnings per share for 10 consecutive quarters. How?

A tightly focused strategy well executed

We have done what we said we were going to do and we have done those things effectively
We are committed to executing flawlessly and continuing to build value for shareholders

107

A tightly focused strategy well executed

Thank You!
108

For more information, please visit www.cfindustries.com

Reconciliation of non-GAAP Measures CF Industries


In millions, except percentages and share price EBITDA Calculation Net Earnings Attributable to Common Stockholders Interest Expense (net) Income Taxes Depreciation, depletion and amortization Less: other adjustments EBITDA (1) Sales EBITDA as a % of Sales Enterprise Value Calculation Shares Outstanding Share Price (2) Equity Market Value Debt Cash Enterprise Value Enterprise Value / EBITDA (3) Total Debt / EBITDA Debt Senior Unsecured Notes Issued May 23, 2013 Adjusted Debt (4) Total Debt / EBITDA Dividends & Share Repurchases as % of EBITDA Dividends Share Repurchases Dividends & Share Repurchases as % of EBITDA (5) Dividends + Share Repurchases of % of Equity Market Value Daily Average Equity Market Value Dividends + Share Repurchases of % of Equity Market Value (6) CF Industries (in USD) 12 Mnths 12 Mnths 12 Mnths 3 Year 3 Mnths Ending Ending Ending Avg as of Ending 12/31/10 12/31/11 12/31/12 12/31/12 3/31/12 3 Mnths Ending 3/31/13 LTM Ending 3/31/13

349 220 277 395 (114) 1,127

1,539 146 932 416 (47) 2,986 6,098 49%

1,849 131 963 420 (43) 3,320 6,104 54% 2,478

368 31 207 103 (7) 702 1,528

407 37 107 107 (7) 651 1,337

1,887 137 863 424 (43) 3,268 5,913 55%

We have presented EBITDA, EBITDA as a % of sales, Enterprise Value to EBITDA, total debt to EBITDA, Dividends & Share Repurchases as a % of EBITDA and Dividends & Share Repurchases as a % of Equity Market Value because management uses these measures to track the companys performance in comparison to its peers and believes that these are frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of companies in our industry. Notes: (1) EBITDA is defined as net earnings attributable to common stockholders plus interest expense (income)-net, income taxes, and depreciation, depletion and amortization. Other adjustments include the elimination of loan fee amortization that is included in both interest and amortization, and the portion of depreciation that is included in noncontrolling interest. (2) Share price as of the end of the applicable period. (3) Enterprise value to EBITDA is defined as enterprise value divided by EBITDA. Enterprise value is defined as equity market value as of the period ending date plus debt minus cash. Equity market value is defined as shares outstanding multiplied by share price. (4) Adjusted Debt includes the $1.5 billion of senior notes issued May 20, 2013. (5) Dividends & Share Repurchases as a percent of EBITDA is defined as average dividends paid and share repurchases for the specified time period divided by average EBITDA for the specified period. (6) Dividends & Share Repurchases as a percent of Equity Market Value defined as average dividends paid plus share repurchases for the specified time period divided by the daily average equity market value for the specified time period.

65.4 144.98 9,482 1,618 (1,207) 9,893 3.3x

63.0 203.16 12,799 1,605 (2,275) 12,129 3.7x

60.6 190.37 11,536 1,605 (2,210) 10,931 3.3x

1,959

1,618

1,605

1.7x

0.5x

0.5x

1,605 1,498 3,103 0.9x

26 -

69 1,000

103 500

66 500 23%

26 -

25 500

102 1,000 34%

9,636 6%

12,796 9%

110

Reconciliation of non-GAAP Measures CF Industries


In millions, except percentages Total Debt / Equity Market Value Total Debt Senior Unsecured Notes Issued May 23, 2013 Adjusted Debt (1) Equity Market Value Total Debt / Equity Market Value (2) Free Cash Flow to Total Debt Operating Cash Flow Capital Expenditures Dividends Noncontrolling Interest Free Cash Flow Free Cash Flow / Total Debt (3) ROIC Calculation Operating Income Tax @ 35% Net Operating Income After Tax Cash Short Term Borrowing Notes Payable Current Portion of LT Debt Noncurrent Notes Payable Long-term Debt Non-Controlling Interest Stockholders Equity Invested Capital ROIC (4) Return on Equity Calculation Net Earnings Attributable to Common Stockholders Stockholders Equity ROE (5) 12 Mnths Ending 12/31/10 12 Mnths Ending 12/31/11 CF Industries (in USD) 12 Mnths 3 Mnths Ending Ending 12/31/12 3/31/12 3 Mnths Ending 3/31/13 LTM Ending 3/31/13

1,959

1,618

1,605

9,482 17%

12,799 13%

1,605 1,498 3,103 11,536 27%

We have presented Total Debt to Equity Market Value, Free Cash Flow to Total Debt, Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) and Return on Equity (ROE) because management uses these measures to track the companys performance in comparison to its peers and believes that these are frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of companies in our industry. Invested capital, stockholders equity and each of their components are period-end amounts and not average amounts. Notes: (1) Adjusted Debt includes the $1.5 billion of senior notes issued May 20, 2013. (2) Total Debt to Equity Market Value is defined as total debt divided by Equity Market Value. Total debt is defined as all debt for the specified time period. Equity Market Value is defined as shares outstanding multiplied by the share price. (3) Free Cash Flow to Total Debt is defined as operating cash flow minus capital expenditures, dividends paid and minority interest divided by all debt. (4) ROIC is defined as after tax operating income divided by invested capital. After tax operating income is defined as operating income times the net of 1 minus a standard tax rate of 35% (operating income x (1- tax rate of 35%)). Invested capital is defined as net debt plus stockholders equity. Net debt is defined as all debt plus minority interests (Non-controlling Interest) minus cash. (5) ROE is defined as net earnings divided by stockholders equity. (6) Share price as of the end of the applicable period. (7) Enterprise value to EBITDA is defined as enterprise value divided by EBITDA. Enterprise value is defined as equity value plus debt minus cash. Equity value is defined as shares outstanding multiplied by share price.

1,194 (258) (26) (117) 793 0.4x

2,079 (247) (69) (146) 1,617 1.0x

2,376 (524) (103) (232) 1,517 0.9x

603 (64) (26) (21) 492

679 (153) (25) (17) 484

2,452 (613) (102) (228) 1,509 0.5x

2,791 (977) 1,814 (1,207) 5 1,613 386 4,547 5,344 34%

2,959 (1,036) 1,923 (2,275) 5 1,600 380 5,902 5,612 34%

671 (235) 436

628 (220) 408 (2,210) 5 1,600 385 5,732 5,512

2,916 (1,021) 1,895 (2,210) 5 1,600 385 5,732 5,512 34%

1,539 4,547 34%

1,849 5,902 31%

368

407 5,732

1,887 5,732 33%

111

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi