Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Steel demand has been growing continuously in the developing economies and any sudden
price fluctuations creates detrimental effects in the production process within these
economies, as they heavily depend on steel for infrastructural growth. So, steel futures
might create a condition of further price fluctuations due to speculative activity and thus can
prove to be harmful for the producers and consumers of the emerging economies. These
producers and consumers lack the capability to accommodate with the problems of over-
production and sudden price rise, impacting the aggregate demand and supply which often
has been observed to be imbalanced. This paper broadly presents the problems with
commodity futures trading and its relationship to the role played by hedging and
speculation. Speculative activity tends to dominate the investments in futures markets and
thus break the link between the futures market and underlying physical commodity, when
the commodity futures reflect the expected future price of the underlying commodity.
This paper focuses on the Commodity Futures Market as it has implications on the exchange
of real commodities which are engaged directly in the process of production of goods and
capital in the real economy. Commodity futures markets have been developed for the
purpose of facilitating the exchange between producers and consumers of different
commodities, thus, providing a medium through which all trade interests converge at a
single platform reflecting the broad demand and supply. In theory of Commodity Trading
and Commodity Futures this creates price stability and removes anomalies in commodity
pricing, which may arise otherwise due to imbalances or inadequate representation in the
demand or supply. But an analysis of the nature of trading within the commodity futures
market with historical references substantiates the debate on destructive nature of the
derivatives trading which often questions the fundamentals of existence of any commodity
futures market. A variety of derivatives are traded on a commodity exchange which
introduce a rouge pattern of inter-locking of different underlying assets that drives pricing of
these derivative products to become dependent on each other. The manifestation of price
distortion and volatility due to these financial innovations in derivative trading can be
observed through a critical analysis of certain inherently volatile commodities. For the
purpose of this paper, the focus commodity has been maintained as steel, a recent inclusion
in the world of derivative trading, for steel price stability and facilitation of exchange
between producers and consumers of steel.
Steel has a long history of production and distribution, with different forms of steel
originating in different parts of the ancient world. Steel is a major raw material input for
majority of the modern infrastructure in the developed economies and has witnessed an
increasing demand in the developing world, especially the during the recent growth period
of emerging markets like China, India, and Brazil. The high demand is driven by the
development projects mostly for infrastructural growth and real estate projects. The steel
production has also encountered a fundamental shift from the dominance of OECD
countries, till late 1980s, as the major producers of steel to growing share of production
market by emerging economies like China, India, and South Korea. The major consumption
sectors of steel in the economy are Automobile Industry, Construction Industry, Oil and Gas
Industry, Container Industry, etc.
Steel industry around the world has been faced with price volatility over different periods of
time which has been reflected as an added pressure on the production and consumption of
steel. Volatility in the steel industry has been fueled by various factors like demand-supply
imbalance, raw material prices, changes in the crude-oil price.
(million metric tons crude steel production)
2006 2005
While there is a growing support for futures trading for finished or semi-finished products of
steel, major steel corporations like MittalArcelor has shown resentment to the use of
derivatives as anchors of price stability. There view on steel pricing and curbing volatility is
inclined towards steel industry consolidation and adjustment of production levels with
aggregate demand for steel in the international markets.
According to futures market theory, the derivatives traded in commodities helps create an
efficient allocation of risk and, therefore, demonstrates sustainable price levels for different
commodities traded on the exchange. This is based on the effect of a broad and transparent
platform for demand and supply which restraints any disproportionate influence on price
determination of a particular commodity. The underlying assumption for the explanation of
existence of a price discovery mechanism is that the supply and demand factors related to
the market are based on the actual physical trade of the commodity and there is a long-
term (contract length) view for an appropriate price for buying or selling the commodity on
a future date. So, hedging strategy in a futures market is interpreted as an insurance
against any loss bearing price movements for a commodity.
Brian and Rafferty argue that derivatives act as the anchor of the global financial system
(Brain and Rafferty, 2007). According to this argument, beyond hedging and speculation,
derivatives in aggregate commensurate the value of financial assets traded on the
exchange. So, derivatives, or what the authors call – „system of derivatives‟, create complex
networks of relative pricing mechanism for different financial assets, in different markets.
Due to this interlinking of different financial asset prices, the reflection of any individual
financial asset price is going to reflect the anchored value dependent on its relationship with
all other financial assets, or the relative value. They introduce two concepts of „Binding‟ and
„Blending‟, where binding is of the future value of a financial asset into the present and
blending is the swift convertibility of different financial asset forms, like swaps for interest
rates to commodity futures. This view is problematic in terms of analyzing a derivative
market which is based on the assumption of „real‟ and „rational‟ valuations of future prices in
the present. With this assumption the whole system of derivative pricing gets deteriorated,
as in practice the pricing of financial assets in a futures market does not necessarily reflect
the real „anchored‟ future value. If this assumption was to be correct, price-overshooting in
stock and futures markets would cease to exist and derivatives would become the real
reflection of demand and supply created by forces of production and consumption.
When Brian and Rafferty comment on financial asset pricing „beyond speculation‟, there
arises an inherent question as to why the speculation would exist if there was a real
reflection of prices in any financial market. Speculation is an activity that is fundamentally
motivated by the market oriented profit maximization strategy. Theoretically speculation
supports a derivative market, like that of the commodity futures market, by ensuring that
changes that appear in financial asset values due to price fluctuations, following the
changes in demand and supply, are evened out by speculating in the opposite direction of
price movements. So, if the price fluctuations lead to asset price appreciation, the
speculator would sell and in case of asset price depreciation the speculator would buy,
therefore, correcting the price value of financial assets through trading in futures markets.
In theory this mechanism is useful as would stabilize the underlying spot prices for
commodities through trading in the derivatives on the commodity futures exchange.
Futures markets consist of the following two broad division of actors - Hedgers and
Speculators. Fundamentally, hedgers engage in risk aversion of price changes in the future
by buying or selling a commodity at the present price for a future delivery of the actual
commodity. Speculators, on the other hand, are actors which invest in the futures market to
profit from the price change of a certain financial asset, or an underlying commodity in the
case of commodity futures, based on the expected price fluctuations. As the commodity
futures markets have witnessed that the majority of the trading in popular commodities is
undertaken by speculators as compared to hedgers which creates a contradiction to the
original argument provided by the market oriented proponents of the commodity futures
market that hedgers and speculators balance out the price fluctuations that can occur in the
underlying commodity. The contradiction arises because the more the speculative activity
exists the more will be the expectations of a price change in the underlying commodity, as
speculation dwells on price change or price volatility.
Financial Fragility and Futures Trading
Financial Fragility is the concept of self-fueling financial asset bubbles which are self-
fulfilling and with intangible factors like investor mood swings these bubbles can bust
creating dramatic consequences for financial markets, which spill over to the real economy
which depend on these markets (Stanford, 1999).
With an initial asset price rise, weather based on real fundamentals or subjective
expectations, the investors will buy financial assets to make profit by selling them in the
future at a higher price. But these expectations of future profits are not always serviced by
the financial markets. It would be too simplistic to discuss financial rise and fall affecting
asset prices concentrated in the financial institutional framework. In reality, it is a complex
relationship between real economy where real goods are produced and real investment
takes place and the financial markets where these asset prices are hedged and speculated.
This complex relationship forms actor expectations in the financial markets based on
economic fundamentals, but often leads to an overvaluation of assets in a financial market
which is responsible to create the bubble effect within the real underlying fundamentals,
thus creating drastic consequences, beyond the financial arena into the real economy, when
actor expectations are not met by financial markets.
So commodity futures are not just basic tools to hedge against the risk of commodity price
changes in the future, but an important mechanism through which a large number of
investors engage in making profit without having any direct relation to the underlying
commodity. In the case of steel, it is an added advantage that the price volatility is very
high which inturn will attract high volumes of speculative activity. Volatility is a major factor
in speculation as it provides the short-term investors to make profits by trading against
frequent price changes.
Commodity futures markets are subject to sudden shift of investor expectations which leads
to switching of large funds in and out of these commodity markets. The switching of large
funds creates an impact on the price levels of the commodity futures, which are
theoretically reflecting the „real‟ future expectations of price change in the underlying
commodity. So, this produces an externality in the pricing mechanism of commodity
futures. The externality could be exogenous factors like change in exchange rates, interest
rates, and macroeconomic fundamentals of developed and developing economies, creating
accentuating effects within the commodity price cycles (Maizels, 1992).
The analysis of the undergoing credit crisis, which was initiated by the sub-prime lending
defaults in the US economy, provides an outlook discussed above for the commodity
markets. The weakening of the US dollar puts direct pressure on oil prices, and the weak
expectation in the equity markets lead to a shift in the investing strategies of large funds
and other investors. There has been an increased investment towards commodity markets
in order to decouple from the fluctuations in the equity markets and depreciation of the US
dollar. This is a hedging strategy is used by investors holding stocks and futures positions
affected by the devaluation of the US dollar, creating sudden price appreciation for various
commodities. A falling dollar has continuously created an upward movement of the
commodity prices, with an acute price appreciation in the month of January 2008
(Economist Feb. 21st, 2008), in primary commodity prices like that of oil, gold, soyabeen,
etc. Investors tend to create futures positions in the commodity markets in order to hedge
against the risk of incurring losses due to a further US dollar devaluation. Also, the rising oil
prices for the same reason has been another external factor pushing the commodity prices
to higher levels, independent of the character of demand and supply within this short-term
price accentuation. These commodity price levels in the futures market are not based on
any underlying fundamentals which could affect the demand and supply of the commodities,
but instead they reflect the investor‟s perception towards certain markets at a certain time
in history.
As Robert Shriller argues in his book on investor psychology named „irrational exuberance‟
that investors are not always motivated by complex mathematical calculations of risk in
certain investments. Investor response to market conditions is mostly governed by herd
behavior, as is also noted by Adam Harmes who gives an explanation of the role of mutual
funds in a financial crisis (Harmes, 2001). Commodity futures more than often face the
problem of volatility in prices due to exogenous changes like interest and exchange rates
and also due to the fact that many commodities have interlinking relationships in the „real‟
productive economy, where these commodities are used as raw materials or other inputs
towards a particular production process. In such a condition, the „rationality‟ of the investors
trading on the commodity futures is governed more by their subjective valuations of market
sentiment rather than the theoretical arguments provided in favor of hedging strategies as
the underlying fundamentals behind the existence of commodity futures markets
In the case of Steel production the raw material supplies involve various other volatile
commodities like scrap, iron ore, and coke. These commodities have inherent price volatility
which is reflected in the pricing for steel finished and semi-finished products. Dependency of
oil prices for these commodities creates an imperative for price fluctuations for any
commodity dependent on oil-based raw material. There has been an evidenced price
variation even in the non-oil primary commodities, but the dependency of oil for other
commodities brings an entirely external cause for price corrections. This arugemnt can be
extended to all traded commodities in general as the dependency of different commodities
on each other creates a complex web of commodity price changes and a reflection of an
aggregate change in the demand and supply of all dependent commodities in this web and
not just that of an individual commodity independently.
Steel future contracts have been traded in the past on the Dubai Gold and Commodities
Exchange (DGCX), since October 2007, and also on the National Commodity & Derivatives
Exchange (NCDEX) and the Multi Commodity Exchange of India (MCX). But treading volume
of these contracts has been observed to be very low. The problem that can be associated
with the low volumes of trade provides a clear view that the steel as a commodity is not
attractive to be traded on futures for the purpose of hedging. Moreover, steel prices have
been fluctuating and, therefore, it does not provide enough incentive to the speculators to
create exposures with high risk due to low trading volumes. Recently steel futures contracts
have been launched by the London Metal Exchange (LME) based on steel billets (a semi-
finished steel product). LME has provided a detailed survey on the international steel market
and the need for a futures market to promote stability in the global steel prices.
The futures trading in any particular commodity is subject to market expectation and
participation. Historically steel futures have seen low volumes of trading on various
commodity markets. One reason has been the low incentive for major steel producers to
engage in hedging strategies on the future steel prices due to high levels of fluctuation in
the global steel prices. Most producers agree that price fluctuations are based on over-
production or sudden increase in demand from certain economic regions which can be
checked by making production close in capacity to the demand levels in the international
market. So the problem that arises with steel futures in particular is that of the liquidity in
terms of trading volumes on the futures exchange. With high liquidity the corporations tend
to engage in substantially large open positions in the futures market which tends to stabilize
the underlying commodity prices to certain extent, which is not the case with steel as major
corporations have not been attracted by the steel futures trading.
Country wise Steel Use since 2000 to 2006: Source IISI World Steel in Figures 2007
producing country. So, steel price fluctuations hamper the production as well as
consumption of steel within these developing economies, therefore, impacting the
development of infrastructure and industrial expansion within these economies. The demand
and supply of steel and other commodities partly depends on the future expectations of
price change and would create certain indications for steel producers to adjust to this
changing demand and supply balance which is not based on the actual fundamental demand
for the real physical commodity.
Conclusion
London Metal Exchange survey on steel industry, before the launching the steel futures
contract, points to an existing higher price volatility in steel prices which would require a
futures market for steel price stabilization. But according to the argument presented in this
paper, it is unlikely that functioning of futures market remains within the theoretical
framework of commodity futures market which assumes a „rational‟ investor behavior. They
also argue that the futures trading in steel will create strong linkages between the futures
market and the actual physical market for steel. According to this report price volatility of
steel is only slightly less than that of two other commodities traded on futures markets, i.e.,
aluminum and oil. As is evident by the fluctuation of prices in these commodities even with
their existing futures contracts in various markets that the derivative trading has, ironically,
lead to a destabilization of price stability rather than providing any price support to
commodities traded on the exchange.
Commodity markets have been affected by external factors which justify the argument
made in the paper that futures markets don‟t necessarily reflect the true expectation of
future price change. The reflection in price due to sudden changes is based on investor
perception of market conditions in various different sections, like the currency markets,
government bond markets, etc. Moreover, speculators always dominate the volumes of
trading in a futures exchange, and when speculation is not made for the purpose of hedging
risk but to gain profits in the form of risk (shifted by the hedgers onto the speculators)
premium.
For developing economies, the introduction of steel futures may not work as is expected by
the theory of futures trading. Detriments to the growth of infrastructure are a major
hindrance in other forms of growth within the emerging economies. Steel futures, if fueling
further price instability, would have a direct impact on a broad section of growth in the
emerging market societies. By current levels of growing demand for steel within some
developing economies, they would be indirectly subject to the deteriorating effects of
speculation on different commodities as it will have a an impact on the reflected futures
price of steel itself.
References
Venkataramanan, L.S. (1965), “The Theory of Futures Trading: Hedging, Speculation, and
Storage in Organized Commodity Markets”, Asia Publishing House
Maizels, Alfred (1992), “Commodities in Crisis: The Commodity Crisis of the 1980s and the
Political Economy of International Commodity Policies”, Clarendon Press
Brian, D., and Rafferty, M. (2007) “Financial Derivatives: Bubble or Anchor?”, in Assassi, L.,
Nesvetailova, A., and Wigan, D. (ed.), Global Finance in the New Century: Beyond
Deregulation, Palgrave Mcmillan, 25-37
Working, H. (1978) “Futures Trading and Hedging”, in Goss, B. A., and Yamey, B. S. (ed.),
The Economics of Futures Trading, Macmillan Press, 68-82
Johnson, Leland L. (1978) “The Theory of Hedging and Speculation in Commodity Markets”,
in Goss, B. A., and Yamey, B. S. (ed.), The Economics of Futures Trading, Macmillan Press,
83-99
Gilbert, Ghosh, and Hallett, Hughes (1987) “Stabilizing Speculative Commodity Markets”,
Oxford University Press
London Metal Exchange (LME). (2003) “Analysis and Survey Results for the Establishment of
Steel Future Contract”
Brown, O., Crawford, A., and Gibson, J. (2008) “Boom or Bust: How Commodity Price
Volatility Impedes Poverty Reduction, And What to do About It”, International Institute for
Sustainable Development
Sunni, P. (2006) “Commodity Futures as Predictors of Future Spot Prices”, ETLA Research
Paper
Blackburn, R. (2002) “The Enron Debacle and the Pension Crisis”, New Left Review, Mar-
Apr, 26-51
Ciner, C. (2006) “Hedging and Speculation in Derivative Markets: the Case of Energy
Futures Contracts”, Applied Financial Economics Letters, 2, 189-192
Lerner, Robert L. (2000) “The Mechanics of the Commodity Futures Markets: What They Are
and How They Function”, Special Report No.-2, Mount Lucas Management Corp., June
Stanford, Jim (1999), “Paper Boom: Why the Real Prosperity Requires a New Approach to
Canada‟s Economy”, (Chap 3 and 13), pp. 41-71, 283-303
Harmes, Adam (2001), “Unseen Power: How Mutual Funds Threaten the Political and
Economic Welfare of Nations”, Toronto: Stoddart; pp. 18-82