Scribd Logo
Importer

Bienvenue sur Scribd !

  • Ethics, Safety, Society, Environment Assessment Rubric

    Transféré par

    jose sauceda
    387 vues2 pages
    This document is an assessment rubric used to evaluate students in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Auburn University on topics related to ethics, safety, society, and the environment. The rubric assesses students across four topics - professional integrity and ethical decision making, safety and health issues, environmental aspects, and public interest and societal impact. For each topic, students can receive a score from 0 to 3 based on the depth of their understanding and effectiveness in addressing the issues. An overall score between 0-3 is unacceptable, 4-6 is marginal, 7-9 is acceptable, and 10-12 is exceptional.

    Description originale:

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Formats disponibles

    PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd

    Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

    Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

    Signaler ce document
    This document is an assessment rubric used to evaluate students in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Auburn University on topics related to ethics, safety, society, and the environment. The rubric assesses students across four topics - professional integrity and ethical decision making, safety and health issues, environmental aspects, and public interest and societal impact. For each topic, students can receive a score from 0 to 3 based on the depth of their understanding and effectiveness in addressing the issues. An overall score between 0-3 is unacceptable, 4-6 is marginal, 7-9 is acceptable, and 10-12 is exceptional.

    Droits d'auteur :

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
    Signaler comme contenu inapproprié
    387 vues2 pages

    Ethics, Safety, Society, Environment Assessment Rubric

    Transféré par

    jose sauceda
    This document is an assessment rubric used to evaluate students in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Auburn University on topics related to ethics, safety, society, and the environment. The rubric assesses students across four topics - professional integrity and ethical decision making, safety and health issues, environmental aspects, and public interest and societal impact. For each topic, students can receive a score from 0 to 3 based on the depth of their understanding and effectiveness in addressing the issues. An overall score between 0-3 is unacceptable, 4-6 is marginal, 7-9 is acceptable, and 10-12 is exceptional.

    Droits d'auteur :

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
    Signaler comme contenu inapproprié
    sur 2

    Department of Chemical Engineering Auburn University

    Ethics, Safety, Society, Environment Assessment Rubric


    Course No.: Team/Student: CHEN4470 Process Design Practice Date: Reviewer:

    Topic (Weight)

    Unacceptable (0)

    Marginal (1)

    Acceptable (2)

    Exceptional (3)

    Points

    F
    Professional Integrity & Ethical Decision Making (1)

    No evidence of any

    Serious deficiencies

    Sound

    Clear and complete

    appreciation and/or understanding of professional integrity and/or ethics. Incapable of answering any questions on the subject.

    in appreciation and/or understanding of professional integrity and/or ethics. Only rudimentary questions are answered. Not able to elaborate or explain.

    understanding of and mostly effective in addressing issues related to integrity and ethics. Most decisions and recommendations are supported and can be justified. Some elaboration and explanations given.

    understanding of and effective in addressing issues related to integrity and ethics. Decisions and recommendations are supported and discussed along with elaboration and explanation.

    Safety & Health Issues (1)

    No understanding

    Serious deficiencies

    Sound

    Complete

    or appreciation of safety and health related issues.

    in addressing health and safety issues leading to a unsupported and/or infeasible result.

    understanding of health and safety issues. Mostly effective in achieving supported results.

    understanding of health and safety issues leading to sound and supported results.

    Environmental Aspects (1)

    No understanding

    Environmental

    Sound

    Complete

    or appreciation of the importance of environmental concerns.

    aspects are addressed ineffectively with little or no effect on end results.

    understanding of environmental aspects. Mostly effective in addressing environmental issues.

    understanding of environmental aspects. Effective in addressing of environmental issues leading to a better result.

    F
    Public Interest & Societal Impact (1)

    No consideration of

    Serious deficiencies

    Sound

    Complete

    public interest or societal impact. None or erroneous evaluation of global effects of engineering project/product.

    in understanding public interest and/or societal impact. Ineffective evaluation of impact of engineering project/product adversely affects result.

    understanding of public understanding of public interest and societal interest and societal impact. impact. Mostly effective evaluation of engineering project/product impact leads to improved results. Effective assessment of engineering project/product impact support and explain results.

    Department of Chemical Engineering Auburn University

    OVERALL PERFORMANCE POINTS REQUIRED

    Unacceptable

    Marginal

    Acceptable

    Exceptional

    TOTAL

    03

    46

    79

    1012

    Vous aimerez peut-être aussi