Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 4

Name of evaluator:

_________________

GRUNDTVIG NEW LEARNING PARTNERSHIPS COMMON EUROPEAN QUALITY ASSESSMENT FORM

2007

Partnership reference N Name of applicant organisation: The applicant institution is: the project coordinator a partner

Section B of the application form: Information on the Project and the Partnership
Partnership title:

Section C of the application form: Partnership Content and Organisation1

Question in the application form C.1.1 The aims and objectives of the project are clear, realistic and address a relevant subject for Grundtvig. (Please also refer to Summary of the project in Section B.1) C.1.2 The nature and expertise of the organisations involved in the partnership is adapted to the aims and objectives of the project. There is an appropriate balance between the roles and tasks of the different participants in terms of their competences and their involvement in the activities defined. Appropriate measures have been planned to ensure effective communication and cooperation between the participating organisations/institutions. The expected impact and benefits of European cooperation is clear and well defined on:
(1) the learners and staff directly participating,

Points

Max

20

C.1.3

C.1.4

C.1.5

8 6

(2) the organisations / institutions participating in the Learning Partnership as a whole (3) and, where relevant, the local community / region where each organisation / institution is located.

C.1.6 C.1.7

The project is integrated in the current activities of the participating organisations. The Partnership has defined an approach to evaluate whether the aims and the expected impact of the Partnership will be achieved in the course of the project lifecycle.

8 5

Note on the points system: Each criterion below should be rated on the scale proposed. These ratings result in a total number of points out of maximum 100. Please note that only proposals which receive at least 50 points may receive points for European and/or national priorities. Those scoring less than 50 points will not be further evaluated and will not be selected for funding.
2

C.1.8.

The planned dissemination and exploitation activities are well defined and ensure optimal use of the results amongst:
(1) the participating organisations / institutions, (2) other organisations / institutions in the local community (3) and, where applicable, the wider lifelong learning community.

5 5 5 20

C.1.12.

The Activity Planning table covers the whole period of 2 years and defines and distributes tasks among the partners in such a way that the results can be achieved and all partners are actively involved. The planned mobilities are relevant for the Partnership in question. The results are relevant. TOTAL POINTS FOR THE QUALITY ASSESSMENT

100

Question EUROPEAN PRIORITIES FOR 2007 in the application form C.1.9 C.1.10 C.1.11 The application clearly explains how the theme of intercultural dialogue will be addressed. The applicant organisation has never before received a Partnership grant. The project has planned specific activities to : actively involve adult learners throughout the Partnership (planning, implementation and evaluation). help people with a disability or other special needs to take part in the Partnership. help promote the participation of learners or organisations/institutions disadvantaged for socio-economic, geographic or other reasons. make sure that women and men have equal access to the Partnership. TOTAL POINTS FOR 2007 EUROPEAN PRIORITIES 5 5 5 10 10

5 40

NATIONAL PRIORITIES FOR 2007:

A max. of 20 points for all national priorities.

(space for NAs to insert national priorities)

TOTAL POINTS FOR 2007 NATIONAL PRIORITIES

20

TOTAL POINTS (Quality assessment + European + National priorities) OVERALL COMMENTS:

I hereby declare to the best of my knowledge that I have no conflict of interest (including family, emotional life, political affinity, economic interest or any other shared interest) with the organisation(s) or any of the persons having submitted this grant application. Furthermore, I confirm that I will not communicate to any third party any information that may be disclosed to me in the context of my work as an evaluator. _______________________ Date __________________________________ Name and signature

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi