Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
by Ruel Guerrero
A very controversial issue in the church is the place of tithing under the
New Covenant. Tithing is undoubtedly an Old Covenant law. However,
many, if not most, churches, denominations, and leaders teach tithing
as a New Covenant principle taught by Jesus.
Tithing in the Old Cove- There are three tithes commanded under the Old Covenant.
nant 1. The first tithe is a tithe of agricultural and farm produce
(Lev. 27:30-33). All 12 tribes were to pay the tithe to
support the 13th tribe — the Levites, who did not re-
ceive any inheritance in the division of the Promised
Land (Num. 18:21-24). God specifically gave them the
first tithe as their inheritance. They had no land and
had to live among the other tribes. From the Levites
came the Temple priests. Aaron was of the tribe of Levi.
His descendants formed the Aaronic priesthood and
from them came the high priest.
2. The second tithe is a tithe of each harvest (Deut.
14:22-27). The Israelites were to go to Jerusalem three
times a year — on the Feast of Unleavened Bread
(spring harvest), the Feast of Weeks (summer harvest),
and the Feast of Tabernacles (autumn harvest) and eat
the tithe there.
3. The third tithe is an additional tithe every third and
sixth year out of seven years (Deut. 14:28-29). It was
meant to feed (again) the Levite plus the widows and
orphans of Israel, and also foreigners in the land. It
served as Israel's welfare system.
Through the history of Israel, tithing, and related laws like the
sabbatical year (observed every seven years) and the year of
jubilee (observed every 50 years) were hardly ever obeyed. In
fact, not once was the jubilee ever celebrated. It was too diffi-
cult for the Israelite leaders and the landed to give up the real
estate properties they had acquired through the years and re-
turn them to their rightful original owners for free. Imagine if
all rich people in the country gave up their rights to their huge
landholdings and returned them to the original inhabitants of
the land?
Tithing as Mentioned in There are only two incidences where tithing seems to have
the New Testament been supported in the New Testament.
• Jesus in his diatribe against the scribes and Pharisees
(Matt. 23:23; Luke 11:42)
©2009 All rights reserved. Permission granted to copy and distribute freely for free.
1
• Abraham in paying a tithe of the spoils of war to
Melchizedek (Heb. 7:1-10).
In the first, Jesus scolded the scribes and Pharisees, who were
under the Old Covenant, to do mercy, love, justice, and faith-
fulness as virtues above and beyond tithing.
In the second, the writer of Hebrews stated that Aaron and the
Levites, who received Israel's tithes, actually paid a tithe to
Melchizedek through Abraham. In essence, if anyone deserved
to receive the tithe, it was Melchizedek (the King of Righteous-
ness and the King of Peace — Jesus himself).
Transferring Tithing If, for the sake of argument, the first tithe were commanded in
Principles into the New the New Covenant, we would need to analyze the direction of
Covenant our tithing so as to pay it correctly. Notice the following:
• Tithing was paid by all tribes to the Levites who were
their priests
• The Levites and the priests served in the Temple
We who are the new priesthood and the New Temple should
receive the tithe. We includes not only church leaders but also,
equally, all widows, orphans, the poor among us, children,
youth, those who do not serve in church ministries, and new
believers! Why is it then that the modern-day tithe is used to
support the few — to pay the salaries of the clergy, the staff,
the building, the utilities, and the programs? What happened
to the share of all those who equally deserve the tithe?
Who Pays the Temple Again, when Peter was asked whether Jesus paid the temple
Tax? tax, he affirmed it. But when he came to Jesus, he asked Peter
who should pay taxes, the King's sons or others. The answer
of course is that the King's sons are exempted from paying
taxes. Instead, they are beneficiaries of the kingdom's tax
revenues. (See Matt. 17:24-27.)
From the Part to the A very important principle in the move from the Old Covenant
Whole to the New Covenant is the principle of the part to the whole.
In the Old Covenant, one day was set aside by God for Israel
as a holy day, a time to rest. This was the Sabbath — the sev-
enth day — the fourth commandment.
©2009 All rights reserved. Permission granted to copy and distribute freely for free.
2
his eternal rest. Instead of giving one day to God, we give our
entire lives to Jesus.
This is the principle of the part to the whole. God does not ask
for one small part of our lives anymore. He asked only a por-
tion of the lives of those who had not received the Holy Spirit.
But now He asks for our entire lives. "Whoever loses his life for
my sake will find it" (Matt. 10:39). The first and greatest
commandment states, "Love the Lord your God with all your
heart and with all your soul and with all your mind" (Matt.
22:37).
God wants not just one day out of seven. He wants seven days
each week. In modern parlance, God wants us 24/7.
The Principle of Equality In the wilderness, God provided manna to the Israelites. He
commanded that everyone should gather manna in the morn-
ing to last him for the day (Exo. 16:4-5). The manna was not
to be stored for the following day because it would rot and
spoil. The children and the weak gathered only a little bit of
manna. The stronger ones gathered more manna than they
needed. But according to the story, no one had too much and
no one lacked (Exo. 16:17-18). We tend to speculate that it
was simply that the strong ate more and the weak ate less so
no had too much and no one lacked.
To Paul, equality did not mean that all of us had the same re-
sources at the same time. But rather, equality meant that
those who had more helped those who had less so that later
those who had less will have more and will be able to help
those who had more but now had less.
©2009 All rights reserved. Permission granted to copy and distribute freely for free.
3
The Israelites did not all gather the same amount of manna.
But those who gathered more shared with those who gathered
less. That is why no one had more than they needed and no
one lacked. This is the principle of equality. Those who have
more ought to share with those who have less.
But then who are the New Covenant priests according to Pe-
ter? Are we not the children of Jesus and therefore the children
of Melchizedek? If so, we deserve to receive the tithe from
Abraham and all Israel, instead of being the ones to pay the
tithe to a select group of individuals.
05 JUN 09
©2009 All rights reserved. Permission granted to copy and distribute freely for free. 4