PURPOSE The assignment is aimed at providing learners with the opportunity to use analytical methods of reasoning to reach a decision

on an ethical problem.

REQUIREMENT Bribery has been and continues to be a part of the social structure of many cultures. For example, the American Vice President, Spiro Agnew, resigned from office after it was discovered that he took bribes while serving as Governor of Maryland. In sports, Pakistani cricketers were found guilty of accepting bribes in certain matches against England. Bribery can be in many forms, such as gifts, kickbacks, donations, contributions, share options or career promotions.

Define the act of bribery. Using the economic, legal and ethical approaches, analyse the issue of bribery to conclusively demonstrate its position from the moral point of view.

_________________________________________________________________________ MUKA SURAT TAMAT / END OF PAGE

Rasuah telah dan terus menjadi sebahagian daripada struktur sosial banyak budaya. Sebagai contoh, Naib Presiden Amerika Syarikat, Spiro Agnew, meletak jawatan dari jawatan selepas ia ditemui bahawa dia telah mengambil rasuah semasa berkhidmat sebagai Gabenor Maryland. Dalam sukan, kriket Pakistan telah didapati bersalah menerima rasuah dalam perlawanan tertentu terhadap England. Rasuah boleh dalam pelbagai bentuk, seperti hadiah, sogokan, derma, sumbangan, opsyen saham atau promosi kerjaya.

Menentukan tindakan rasuah. Menggunakan pendekatan ekonomi, undang-undang dan etika, menganalisis isu rasuah untuk meyakinkan menunjukkan kedudukannya dari sudut moral pandangan

ATTACHMENT ASSIGNMENT RUBRICS

OUMM3203/ PROFESSIONAL ETHICS /MAY 2013

Criteria

Weight

Low 1

Fair 2

Above average 3

Excellent 4

Max Marks

Introduction Definition, history and practice of bribery

A write-up on bribery was not provided.

The write-up was brief, unclear and lacks depth.

Pengenalan - Definisi, Sejarah dan amalan rasuah

The write-up was brief and clear but without reference to any reputable source.

The write-up was adequate and clear, but without any reference to reputable sources.

The write-up was detailed and clear with adequate references from reputable sources.

Ini menulis-up adalah terperinci dan jelas dengan rujukan yang mencukupi daripada sumber-sumber yang berwibawa. Ini menulis-up adalah terperinci dan jelas dengan rujukan yang mencukupi daripada sumbersumber yang berwibawa.
No economic analysis was carried out. Arguments were not based on microeconomic theories and market forces. Arguments were based on microeconomic theories and market forces but incomplete and/or irrelevant. Arguments were based on microeconomic theories and market forces and were adequate and clear. Arguments were based on microeconomic theories and market forces and were very clear and detailed. Some cost/benefit data illustrations were

Economic analysis on the act of bribery

Analisis ekonomi ke atas perbuatan rasuah

2.5

10

given.

Hujah-hujah yang berdasarkan teoriteori mikroekonomi dan kuasa pasaran dan sangat jelas dan terperinci. Sesetengah kos / faedah data ilustrasi diberikan.
Legal analysis on the act of bribery No legal analysis was carried out.

Analisis undang-undang ke atas perbuatan rasuah

2.5

Arguments were not based on the legal framework and social forces.

Arguments were based on the legal framework and social forces but incomplete/ irrelevant.

Arguments were based on the legal framework and social forces and were adequate and clear.

Arguments based on the legal framework and social forces were clear and detailed.

Hujah-hujah yang berdasarkan rangka kerja undangundang dan kuasakuasa sosial adalah jelas dan terperinci.
No ethical analysis was carried out. Arguments based on ONE ethical theory were soundly presented. Arguments based on TWO ethical theories were soundly presented. Arguments based on THREE ethical theories were soundly presented. Arguments based on FOUR ethical theories were soundly presented.

10

Ethical analysis on the act of bribery

Analisis etika dalam perbuatan rasuah

2.5

Hujah-hujah yang berdasarkan EMPAT teori etika telah nyenyak dibentangkan

10

Conclusion

No conclusion was provided on the outcome of the analysis. 1.5

The conclusion on the outcome of the analysis was vague and/or irrelevant.

The conclusion on the outcome of the analysis was partially complete.

The conclusion on the outcome of the analysis was adequate.

The conclusion on the outcome of the analysis was detailed and complete.

Kesimpulan mengenai hasil analisis adalah terperinci dan lengkap.

Total points

10

40