Injunction, Provisional Remedies, and Special Civil Actions Executive Class Sundays Regular Class Friday - Saturday Quiz

every meeting including the first day of class Grade Distribution Orals Midterms Quizzes (Multiple Choice) Outline of codal provisions and one-sentence holding of cases Drafting of pleadings/motions Attendance in court, as certified by the clerk of court, on a hearing for the application of a provisional remedy Finals Final Average < 60% merits an automatic 60% < Final Average <75% merits a 75% < Final Average 100% merits a proportional grade from Instructions: 1. Bring a copy of the USJR prayer before and after meetings. Better if you have committed the prayer to heart. 2. USJR Law School dress code and other rules and regulations shall be strictly enforced. Failure to abide by the dress code will merit a day absence. No going out of the classroom while classes are ongoing unless for emergency reasons. Going out without leave of the professor will merit a day absence. 3. Attendance is required. Those with more than 20% unexcused absences shall be given an automatic grade of 5.0. The excuse letter with supporting documents must be submitted either before the day of the intended absence, but no later than the next class session which the absentee shall attend. 4. I require a handwritten outline from each student for each (or a combination of each) provision of each Rule to be discussed prior to the start of the day when the Rule will be discussed, together with a onesentence holding of each assigned case applicable to the Rule. The handwritten outline should be emailed to HelpMeBecomeALawyer@gmail.com no later than five (5) hours before the start of the class. I will not accept paper-printed outlines. The outline should follow, where applicable, the basic journalism outline of 5W (Who, What, Where, When, Why) and 1H (How). 5. Each student should be prepared to recite the entire assigned readings for the session. I will randomly call one to three students at most during each class session. If you have already recited, be prepared to recite again as the student shall be called randomly. 20% 20% 10% 5% 5% bonus 5% 40% 5.0 3.0 2.9 to 1.0.

For the first meeting, please study the preliminary portion and Rule 57 and cases provided under the outline.

Preliminary 1. What are the different provisional remedies under the Rules of Court? Calo v. Roldan, 76 Phil. 445 Rule 57 Preliminary Attachment 1. Grounds (1) a. Plaintiff b. Other Proper Party i. Borja v. Platon, 73 Phil. 659 c. What may be attached? i. Professional Video, Inc. v. TESDA, G.R. No. 155504, June 26, 2009 d. Liberty Insurance Corporation v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 104405, 222 SCRA 37, 45 [1993] e. Officer of a corporation i. Olsen v. Olsen, 48 Phil 238 f. Fraud Incurring the obligation i. Ng Wee v. Tankiansee, G.R. No. 171124, February 13, 2008 ii. FCY Construction Group, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 381 Phil. 282 (2000). iii. Metro, Inc. v. Laras Gifts, G.R. No. 171741, November 27, 2009 iv. Republic v. Estate of Lim, G.R. No. 164800, July 22, 2009 g. Disposal in fraud of creditors i. Aboitiz v. Cotabato, 105 SCRA 88 h. Residing out of the Philippines i. Mialilhe v. De Lencquesaing, 142 SCRA 694 Issuance and Contents of Order (2) a. Ex parte i. (Toledo v. Burgos, 168 SCRA 513) b. Upon motion with notice and hearing c. Issued by: d. Contents: e. Torres v. Satsatin, G.R. No. 166759, November 25, 2009 Affidavit and bond (3, 4) a. The affidavit, and the bond required by the next succeeding section, must be duly filed with the court before the order issues. b. Affidavit of: i. Applicant ii. or of some other person who personally knows the facts c. Contents of Affidavit: i. that a sufficient cause of action exists, ii. that the case is one of those mentioned in section 1 hereof, iii. that there is no other sufficient security for the claim sought to be enforced by the action, and iv. that the amount due to the applicant, or the value of the property the possession of which he is entitled to recover, is as much as the sum for which the order is granted above all legal counterclaims. d. Philippine Bank of Communications v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 115678. February 23, 2001 e. Ng Wee, id. f. Bond i. FROM: ii. TO: iii. AMOUNT:

2.

3.

iv. PURPOSE: Case: Republic v. Garcia, G.R. No. 167741, 12 July 2007 4. Manner of Attaching Property (5) 5. Sheriffs Return (6) 6. Examination of Party (10) 7. Sale of attached property 8. Discharge of attachment a. Upon counterbond (12) b. G.B. Inc., v. Sanchez, 98 Phil. 886 (1956) i. Insular Savings Bank v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 123638, June 15, 2005 c. On other grounds (13) 9. Third party claim (14) a. Rural Bank of Sta. Barbara v. Manila Mission of Church of Jesus Christ, August 19, 2009 10. Balance collected upon execution (16) 11. Disposition 12. Claim for damages (20) Rule 58 Preliminary Injunction 1. Definition (1) a. Temporary Restraining Order b. Preliminary Injunction i. Limitless Potentials v. CA, G.R. No. 164459, April 24, 2007 c. Final Injunction d. Preventive Injunction e. Mandatory Injunction i. Semirara Coal Corporation v. HGL Development, G.R. No. 166854, December 6, 2006 ii. China Banking Corporation v. Co, G.R. No. 174569, September 17, 2008 Classes Origin a. Devesa v. Arbes, 13 Phil. 273. Purpose a. Preysler v. CA, G.R. No. 158141, July 11, 2006 b. Limitless Potentials (supra) Scope a. Mantile v. Cajucom, 19 Phil. 563. Distinguished from Mandamus Distinguished from Prohibition a. Feliciano v. Alipio, G.R. No. L-5656, March 24, 1954 Kinds When is Mandatory Injunction Issued (3) When is Preliminary Injunction Issued (3) a. Semirara Coal, supra. b. Barayuga v. Adventist University, G.R. No. 168008, 17 August 2011 c. Australian Professional Realty, Inc. v. Municipality of Padre Garcia Batangas, G.R. No. 183367, March 14 2012 When is a Temporary Restraining Order Issued (5) Irreparable Injury; Definition a. Philippine National Bank v. RJ Ventures, G.R. No. 164548, September 27, 2006 b. Australian Professional Realty, Inc. (id) Status Quo a. Overseas Workers Welfare Administration v. Chavez, G.R. No. 169802, June 8, 2007

2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.

11. 12. 13.

14. 15.

16.

17. 18. 19.

20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30.

b. Dungog v. CA, G.R. No. 139767. August 5, 2003 Who may grant injunction (2) Against whom is injunction issued a. Executive Secretary v. CA, G.R. No. 131719, 5/25/94 b. Mabayo Farm v. CA, G.R. No. 140058, August 1, 2002 c. Senate Blue Ribbon Committee v. Majuducon, G.R. No. 13378, July 29, 2003 d. Southern Cross Cement v. Philippine Cement Manufacturers, G.R. No. 158540, July 8, 2004 e. Delta Ventures v. Cabato, G.R. No. 118216, March 9, 2000 f. Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas Monetary Board and Chuci Fonancier Vs. Hon. Nina G. Antonio-Valenzuela, etc., et al., G.R. No. 184778, October 2, 2009 g. Traders Royal Bank v. IAC, G.R. No. L-66321, October 31, 1984 Injunction on Government Projects or Contracts a. Supreme Court Administrative Circular No. 11 - 2000 b. Republic v. Nolasco, G.R. No. 155108, April 27, 2005 c. Hernandez v. National Power Corp., G.R. No. 145328, March 23, 2006 d. Nerwin Industries Corp. v. PNOC-Energy Development Corporation, G.R. No. 167057, April 11, 2012 Time to grant injunction Jurisdiction of courts Sufficiency of Complaint, Application and Other Requisites (4, 5) a. Republic v. Evangelista, G.R. No. 156015, August 11, 2005 b. Landbank of the Philippines v. Continental Watchman, G.R. No. 136114, January 22, 2004 Injunction Bond (4, 7) a. Limitless Potentials (supra) Objections to issuance (6) a. Spouses Yap v. International Exchange Bank, G.R. No. 175145, March 28, 2008 Damages (8) When is final injunction issued (9) Interim Rules on Intra-Corporate Controversies, section on provisional remedies A.M. No. 07-11-08-SC, Special Rules of Court on Alternative Dispute Resolution (Read and understand Rule 5, Interim Measures of Protection). R.A. 8975 SC Cir. 68-94 (November 3, 1994) SC Resolution of February 17, 1998 (supra, Part VI, F, 10) SC Cir. 13-93 SC Admin. Cir. 20-95 (February 12 ,1995) Rule 59 Receivership

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.

Definition (1) a. Compania General de Tabacos v. Gauzon, 20 Phil. 261. Distinguished from Replevin a. Belgian Catholic Missionaries v. Magallanes Press, 49 Phil. 647. Distinguished from a Sheriff a. Po Pauco v. Siguenza, 52 Phil. 241. Purpose Effect of dismissal of case a. Berg v. Teus, G.R. No. L-2987, February 20, 1951 Granted only in extreme situations b. Vivares v. Reyes, G.R. No. 155408, February 13, 2008. Where rights of a party are still to be determined; Propriety c. Descallar v. CA, G.R. No. 106473, July 12, 1993, 224 SCRA 566, 569. Exhaustion of local remedies d. Bonaplata v. Amber, 2 Phil. 395.

9. 10. 11.

12. 13.

14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21.

Appointment (1) e. Commodities Storage and Ice Plant v. CA, G.R. No. 125008, June 19, 1997. Jurisdiction f. Harden v. Director of Prisons, G.R. No. L-2349, October 22, 1948 Grounds for Appointment of Receiver (1) g. Calo v. Roldan, 76 Phil. 445. h. Ylarde v. Enriquez, G.R. No. L-1401, June 25, 1947. i. Rocha and Co. v. Crossfield, 6 Phil. 355. j. Paranete v. Tan, G.R. No. L-3791, November 29, 1950. Oath, bond (2, 4, 5) k. Citibank NA v. CA, G.R. No. 61508. March 17, 1999. Discharge (3) l. Vivares, supra. m. Martinez v. Grano, 49 Phil. 214. n. Platon v. Sandoval, 74 Phil. 731. Power of Receivers (6) Actions against receivers; Leave of court (6) o. Orendain v. BF Homes, G.R. No. 146313, October 31, 2006 Liability for refusal or neglect to deliver property to receiver (7) Termination and Compensation of Receiver (8) p. Traders Royal Bank v. IAC, G.R. No. 111357, June 17, 1997. Judgment against sureties (9) New Central Bank Act, Section 30. Interim Rules of Procedure for Intra-Corporate Controversies, Rule 9. Rules of Procedure for Corporate Rehabilitation q. Chas Realty & Dev't Corp vs Talavera, G.R. No. 151925, February 6, 2003 Rule 60 Replevin

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11.

Definition (1) Nature a. BA Finance Corporation v. CA, G.R. No. 102998, July 5, 1996. Application (1) a. Servicewide Specialists, Inc. v. CA, G.R. No. 110048, November 19, 1999 Affidavit and Bond (2) a. Citibank v. CA, G.R. No. 61508, March 17, 1999 b. Factoran v. CA, G.R. No. 93540, December 13, 1999 Order (3) a. Sergs Products, Inc. v. PCI Leasing, G.R. No. 137705, August 22, 2000 Duty of Sheriff (4, 8) Enforcement a. Fernandez v. The International Corporate Bank, G.R. No. 131283, October 7, 1999 Return of Property (5) Disposition of Property by Sheriff (6) Claim by Third Persons (7) Judgment (9, 10) a. Visayan Surety and Insurance Corporation v. CA, G. R. No. 127261, September 7, 2001 Rule 61 Support Pendente Lite

1. 2.

Definition a. Family Code, Title VIII Application (1) b. Francisco v. Zandueta, 61 Phil. 752. c. Yangco v. Rhode, 1 Phil. 404. d. Coquia v. Baltazar, G.R. No. L-2942, December 29, 1949

3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.

e. Villanueva v. Villanueva, 54 Phil. 92 f. Magoma v. Macadaeg, G.R. No. L-5153, December 10, 1951 g. Ramos v. CA, L-31897, June 30, 1972 Comment (2) Hearing (3) Order (4) h. Mangonon v. CA, G.R. No. 125041, June 30, 2006 Enforcement of Order (5) Support in Criminal Cases (6) Restitution (7) i. Saavedra v. Ybaez Estrada, 56 Phil. 33

*************************** M I D T E R M S *****************************