Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
The Follow-Up
Report
Institutional Assessment
Guidelines:
Residential Life
(A Guides and Handbooks Report)
Todd V. Titterud
Revised 06/27/2007
The materials in this guideline have been collated to assist your department in the
institutional assessment process. The examples from similar departments in other
institutions are included for comparison purposes to help you develop or revise your own
department’s efforts. They are not intended as recommendations but as efforts to be
reviewed and critiqued to improve your own learning and understanding. While some may be
models of best efforts, others may reveal the range of understanding and interpretation which
is still prevalent. Each department and institution is following their own learning curve toward
the common goal of establishing a culture of evidence-based continuous improvement
founded on student and institutional learning.
environment that promotes a sense of community within the halls, promotes student
involvement and leadership, encourages personal development, and inspires a sense
of responsibility to the local and global community.
2 Sample Goals
Seattle University:
Residence Life & Housing Goals
Provide safe, secure, clean and attractive residential environments
To promote community living in the residence halls
To promote student involvement with campus community
Provide seamless living-learning environments that promote student learning and
development
To nurture student leaders committed to service
Promote and facilitate prominent co-curricular activities and programming with faculty,
staff and students within campus based housing. Continue to offer and promote
substance free living and a total wellness concept. Continue to improve accessibility to
housing facilities for students with disabilities. Continue to work toward technology
access for every student in campus based housing by installation of the internal
network backbone so each student can have ready access to technology. Continue to
improve the work environment in the Residence Life Office through training, staff
development programs, MAP, and communication. Enhance student leadership and
volunteerism through employment and programming opportunities and partnerships
with the Student Involvement Program. Emphasize and promote a “Community Living
Model” in our campus-based housing. Components of Community Living include
values, behavior, diversity (celebrating and acceptance of differences), healthy
choices, positive relationship building, and developing integrity, character, and self-
reliance. Assess outcomes of goals.
The Residence Life Program must provide housing for University of Montana students
that is reasonably priced and meets all life safety and health codes. Additionally this
environment must be one that promotes learning and engenders the positive aspects
of community living. Programs must support the educational mission of The University
and provide co-curricular opportunities for students. These facilities, environment, and
programs must be student preferred and meet the ever-changing needs of today's
students.
3 Sample Objectives
Work closely with the NSU Foundation to identify funding for scholarships for
international and minority students.
University of Oregon:
House at least 25% of the undergraduates on campus to meet the “primarily
residential” Carnegie classification.
CSU Chico:
University Housing and Food Services
What are the learning objectives that your program has (explicit or implicit) for students using
your services?
Upon leaving UHFS, our goal is that residents will have improved their skills in:
relationship building, conflict resolution, problem solving, negotiation, communication,
time management, and priority setting/decision making.
We also want them to have a good understanding of community, personal
accountability, peer pressure, diversity of thought, multicultural awareness, respectful
engagement with other, appropriate boundaries, healthy lifestyle choice (i.e. personal
risk management), and nutritional awareness.
Intended Outcome # 2: 75% of all work order requests submitted in the University Village
and University Lofts will be completed within 48 hours of the day submitted.
Effectiveness Indicators: Unit of measure to gauge our success will be the time to
completion of work requests as documented by completed work orders turned in by
the Operations staff as recorded in the Operation’s database for managing work order
requests. Information contained in the data base includes work order date submitted,
work order date completed, work performed by which employee, and nature of the
work requested.
Success Criteria: Minimum score signaling success of this goal will be 75%
completion of work orders within 48 hours of receipt of the request for both the Village
and the Lofts. Failure to reach 75% will indicate the need for immediate intervention
with the Operations employees who were failing to complete their assigned tasks
within the timeframe prescribed.
Intended Outcome # 3: To achieve an overall satisfaction level of 85% or better with student
staff as it pertains to staff training and student interaction.
Effectiveness Indicators: Factors used as the measuring criteria will be 13 factors
defined in the ACHUHO-I/EBI RA study conducted every year with the Housing student
staff. The following criteria are measured :
• Satisfaction with selection process
• Satisfaction with job expectations
• Satisfaction with providing the necessary job skills
• Effectiveness in enhancing student responsibility and cooperativeness
• Effectiveness in enhancing student self management and values
• Effectiveness in enhancing students drug/alcohol awareness
• Satisfaction with Complex Director (professional staff)
• Satisfaction with RA position (balancing academic/room privacy, remuneration)
• Degree to which inappropriate behaviors affect quality of life
• Degree to which lack of respect for diversity impact quality of life for students
• Satisfaction with Housing polices
• Satisfaction with room assignments/maintenance/cleaning for students
• Overall RA Satisfaction
Success Criteria: The indicator for success will be the achievement of a minimum score
of 80% in the category of Overall RA satisfaction. Scores less than 80% in that category
or any of the other 12 measurable criteria specified above will result in an in-depth review
of training procedures and possible modifications to the training syllabus applicable to
those criteria achieving a score lower than 80%.