Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Vol.12 No.11 A joint publication of the Connecticut Department of Labor & the Connecticut Department of Economic and Community Development
10
November 2007
THE CONNECTICUT
ECONOMIC DIGEST
GRAPH 2: CT Self-Employed (12 MMA ) - Trend and Behavior Over the
Business Cycle: 1982-2007
150,000
Level of Self-Employed
the Connecticut Department of Economic and
Community Development, Compliance Office
and Planning/Program Support. Its purpose is
100,000
to regularly provide users with a
comprehensive source for the most current, up-
to-date data available on the workforce and
economy of the state, within perspectives of 75,000 CT Recessions
the region and nation. Self-Em12MMA
The annual subscription is $50. Send Linear (Self-Em12MMA)
subscription requests to: The Connecticut 50,000
Economic Digest, Connecticut Department of
Jan-82
Jan-83
Jan-84
Jan-85
Jan-86
Jan-87
Jan-88
Jan-89
Jan-90
Jan-91
Jan-92
Jan-93
Jan-94
Jan-95
Jan-96
Jan-97
Jan-98
Jan-99
Jan-00
Jan-01
Jan-02
Jan-03
Jan-04
Jan-05
Jan-06
Jan-07
Labor, Office of Research, 200 Folly Brook
Boulevard, Wethersfield, CT 06109-1114.
Make checks payable to the Connecticut
Department of Labor. Back issues are $4 per Connecticuts self-employment over the massive restructuring that
copy. The Digest can be accessed free of the states business cycle from occurred in the states economy
charge from the DOL Web site. Articles from 1982 to 2007. A linear trend is over this period. This is consistent
The Connecticut Economic Digest may be
reprinted if the source is credited. Please send superimposed on the 12-month with research that has found that
copies of the reprinted material to the Managing moving average (MMA) of self- growth of self-employment in
Editor. The views expressed by the authors employment in Graph 2, with recessions, as opposed to expan-
are theirs alone and may not reflect those of Connecticut recessions shaded in sions, is more likely to be related
the DOL or DECD. to serving as a path out of unem-
grey.1 As is apparent, the self-
employment cycle is not necessarily ployment in an atmosphere of
Managing Editor: Jungmin Charles Joo in sync with the states business limited employment opportunities.2
Associate Editor: Cynthia L. DeLisa cycle. Further, the self-employment Self-employment growth in expan-
We would like to acknowledge the contributions cycle has a much higher frequency. sions is more likely to be related to
of many DOL Research and DECD staff to the Since 1980, the states economy entrepreneurial, risk-taking
publication of the Digest. has experienced three complete behavior. It is an economic envi-
business cycles (measured trough- ronment more conducive to taking
to-trough), using establishment a chance.
employment as the reference series. During the next period of
Over the same period, self-employ- interest, the mid-1990s, there was
Connecticut ment has gone through eight a steep decline in self-employment
Department of Labor complete cycles. The average
recovery/expansion of the state
between April 1996 and July 1998.
Over this 15-month period, self-
Patricia H. Mayfield, Commissioner
Linda L. Agnew, Deputy Commissioner business cycle has lasted 1.74 employment declined from its peak
times longer than a recession, but to its lowest level since the early
Roger F. Therrien, Director an expansion in self-employment 1980s. What happened? This is
Office of Research
200 Folly Brook Boulevard has only lasted 1.39 times as long about the time that the late-
Wethersfield, CT 06109-1114 as a contraction. Though the long- nineties boom in the economy was
Phone: (860) 263-6275 run trend is upward for self- underway. Connecticut nonfarm
Fax: (860) 263-6263 employment, it waxes and wanes employment grew at a rate of
E-Mail: dol.econdigest@ct.gov
Website: http://www.ctdol.state.ct.us/lmi around that trend at a high fre- 30,500 new jobs per year between
quency. 1996 and 1998, based on the
Connecticut Department There are three periods, in annual average. If, in fact,
of Economic and particular, that appear to have
produced interesting patterns in
Connecticuts self-employment
growth was due to a lack of job
Community Development the behavior of self-employment: opportunities during, and immedi-
Joan M. McDonald, Commissioner the Great Recession (February ately following, the Great Reces-
Ronald Angelo, Deputy Commissioner sion, then the boom in nonfarm
1989-December 1992), the mid-to-
late 1990s, and the current cycle, employment growth over this
Compliance Office and Planning/Program which began in 2003. During the period could account for the steep,
Support Great Recession, self-employment and rapid, decline in self-employ-
505 Hudson Street
Hartford, CT 06106-2502
declined, but after two years into ment.
Phone: (860) 270-8000 that recession, self-employment Then the trend reversed be-
Fax: (860) 270-8200 turned around and began growing tween July1998 and March 2000.
E-Mail: decd@ct.gov again. This is probably related to Over this period, nonfarm employ-
Website: http://www.decd.org
2.98
3 2.46 U.S., the growth in self-employ-
2
ment over Connecticuts current
1.21 recovery/expansion is three times
1
0.27 that of the U.S. on a compounded,
0
0.00
annual basis.
Most of the current growth in
-1
-0.96 Connecticuts self-employed has
-2 been over the last two years of this
CT U.S. recovery/expansion. After contract-
ing by nearly 10%, or 11,000, in
2004, the self-employed grew by
ment growth decelerated to a rate ger (see Graph 2). In fact, self- 11,000, or 11%, in 2005. In 2006,
of 18,850 jobs per year as the employment grew from its last the growth in the number of self-
expansion ended and Connecticut trough of 101,920 in December employed jumped by 18,000, or
entered its next recession in July 2004 to 131,214 at its last peak in 16%. This is highlighted in Graph
2000. Over the current cycle, there November 2006. Despite the 4, which tracks an index of self-
has been another round of restruc- anemic growth in both establish- employment growth over the first
turing in the national and state ment and resident wage and salary three years of recovery for the
economies that, once again, has employment, self-employment has 1983, 1992, and current recovery/
changed the behavior of the growth put in a strong performance, expansion (again, no data is avail-
in self-employment. though by February 2007 it had able for 1975). The surge in the
What is notable is the strength declined from its peak to 120,132. growth in self-employment can be
in the growth of self-employment How does the states experience seen for Year 2 (2005) and Year 3
during each of these periods, and compare to the U.S.? Graph 3 (2006), where Year 0 is 2003, the
that in the beginning stages of the presents the answer to that ques- year Connecticuts (and the U.S.)
last recession self-employment tion. Since the U.S. recovery/ recovery in employment began.
behaved in a fashion similar to that expansions have historically However, many of these newly
of the 1981-83 and 1989-92 started before Connecticuts, there self-employed do not seem to be
recessions. In both 1983 and 1992, is a difference in the comparable growing to the point where they are
the decline in self-employment periods over the two sets of expan- adding employees; that is, the
recovered as the recoveries pro- sions. To put the comparison on a number of businesses, as mea-
gressed. However, over the 2003 standardized basis, Graph 3 shows sured by registrations with the
recovery/expansion, the decline in the compounded, annual growth unemployment insurance (UI)
self-employment was steeper and rates of U.S. and Connecticut self- system, has had much lower
went through two complete cycles employment over their respective growth rates over the same period.
(measured peak-to-peak), and recovery/expansions over the post- During the boom/bubble years of
during the last cycle recovery in 1975 era. Connecticut outper- the late 1990s, Connecticuts net
self-employment was much stron- formed the U.S. in self-employ- growth in establishments (mea-
sured fourth quarter-to-fourth
quarter) was averaging 1,100 per
year, or 1.09%, compounded
GRAPH 4: Index of Self-Employment Growth annually. Over the three years after
120
First Three Years of Recovery/Expansion beginning 1983, 1992 and 2003 the bust (2000 to 2003), annual net
growth in new establishments
dropped to 221 per year, 0.39%,
110
compounded annually. This im-
Year 0 = 100
Trough
110 100 Peak 04/2003
Through
03/80
02/92
100 90
Peak Trough
Peak
05/74 01/83
90 80 12/69
80 70 Trough
Trough
11/75
10/71
70 60
70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05
The distance from peak to trough, indicated by the shaded areas, measures the duration of an employment cycle recession. The vertical scale in both
charts is an index with 1992=100.
Stan McMillen [(860) 270-8166, DECD, 505 Hudson Street, Hartford, CT 06106-7106]. Mark Prisloe provides research assistance.
Professors Pami Dua and Stephen M. Miller, in cooperation with Anirvan Banerji at the Economic Cycle Research Institute developed
the leading and coincident employment indexes. The views expressed herein are the author's own and do not necessarily represent
those of the Department of Economics, the University of Connecticut, the Connecticut Department of Labor or the Connecticut
Department of Economic and Community Development. Components of the indexes are described in the Technical Notes on page 23.
The Connecticut Economy's General Drift Indicators are composite measures of the four-quarter change in three coincident (Connecticut Manufac-
turing Production Index, nonfarm employment, and real personal income) and four leading (housing permits, manufacturing average weekly hours,
Hartford help-wanted advertising, and initial unemployment claims) economic variables, and are indexed so 1986 = 100.
The Banknorth Business Barometer is a measure of overall economic growth in the state of Connecticut that is derived from non-manufacturing
employment, real disposable personal income, and manufacturing production.
Sources: Connecticut Department of Economic and Community Development; U.S. Department of Energy, Energy
Information Administration; Connecticut Department of Revenue Services; F.W. Dodge; Connecticut
Department of Motor Vehicles; Connecticut Department of Transportation, Bureau of Aviation and Ports
* Estimated by the Bureau of the Census
Sources: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics; The Conference Board
*Change over prior monthly or quarterly period
**The Boston CPI can be used as a proxy for New England and is measured every other month.
***The Connecticut Economy, Connecticut Center for Economic Analysis, University of Connecticut
Conventional mortgage
INTEREST RATES
rate fell to 6.38 percent
SEP AUG SEP
over the month.
1FSDFOU
2007 2007 2006
Prime 8.03 8.25 8.25
Federal Funds 4.94 5.02 5.25
3 Month Treasury Bill 3.99 4.32 4.93
6 Month Treasury Bill 4.20 4.55 5.08
1 Year Treasury Note 4.14 4.47 4.97
3 Year Treasury Note 4.06 4.34 4.69
5 Year Treasury Note 4.20 4.43 4.67
7 Year Treasury Note 4.33 4.53 4.68
10 Year Treasury Note 4.52 4.67 4.72
20 Year Treasury Note 4.84 5.00 4.93
Conventional Mortgage 6.38 6.57 6.40
Sources: Federal Reserve; Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
-3
94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08
12
Third 1.2 4.7
9 Fourth 3.6 4.5
6
3
0
-3
-6
94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08
Current months data are preliminary. Prior months data have been revised. All data are benchmarked to March 2006.
*Total excludes workers idled due to labor-management disputes. **Includes Indian tribal government employment.
For further information on the Bridgeport-Stamford Labor Market Area contact Arthur Famiglietti at (860) 263-6297.
For further information on the Danbury Labor Market Area contact Arthur Famiglietti at (860) 263-6297.
Current months data are preliminary. Prior months data have been revised. All data are benchmarked to March 2006.
*Total excludes workers idled due to labor-management disputes.
For further information on the Hartford Labor Market Area contact Arthur Famiglietti at (860) 263-6297.
Current months data are preliminary. Prior months data have been revised. All data are benchmarked to March 2006.
*Total excludes workers idled due to labor-management disputes.
For further information on the New Haven Labor Market Area contact Joseph Slepski at (860) 263-6278.
Current months data are preliminary. Prior months data have been revised. All data are benchmarked to March 2006.
*Total excludes workers idled due to labor-management disputes. **Value less than 50
For most air travel occupations, there is an adventurous perk: the chance to fly for free or at substantially
reduced rates. But what about the wages and salaries in those air travel jobs, which include mechanics and
service technicians, airline pilots and flight engineers, flight attendants, and air traffic controllers? Pilots and
flight engineers and air traffic controllers are among the highest paid occupations in the United States.
Median annual salaries of pilots and flight engineers were $141,090 in May 2006; for air traffic controllers,
the median was $117,240. Flight attendants had median annual salaries of $53,780. Flight attendant pay is
based almost entirely on seniority and varies by airline, but attendants can increase their earnings by
working additional hours and flights. Aircraft mechanics and service technicians had median hourly wages of
$22.95, which converts to an annual wage of $47,740 based on a "year-round, full-time" hours figure of
2,080 hours. For avionics technicians, median hourly wages were $22.57, or $46,950 per year.
These data are from the Occupational Employment Statistics program. For more information, see "Sky-high careers:
Jobs related to airlines," by Tamara Dillon, Occupational Outlook Quarterly, Summer 2007. (The Editor's Desk, Bureau
of Labor Statistics, October 4 and 5, 2007)
For further information on the Norwich-New London Labor Market Area contact Lincoln Dyer at (860) 263-6292.
For further information on the Waterbury Labor Market Area contact Joseph Slepski at (860) 263-6278.
Current months data are preliminary. Prior months data have been revised. All data are benchmarked to March 2006.
*Total excludes workers idled due to labor-management disputes. **Includes Indian tribal government employment.
NOTE: More industry detail data is available for the State and its nine labor market areas at: http://
www.ctdol.state.ct.us/lmi/202/covered.htm. The data published there differ from the data in the preced-
ing tables in that they are developed from a near-universe count of Connecticut employment covered by
the unemployment insurance (UI) program, while the data here is sample-based. The data drawn from
the UI program does not contain estimates of employment not covered by unemployment insurance,
and is lagged several months behind the current employment estimates presented here.
Current months data are preliminary. Prior months data have been revised. All data are benchmarked to March 2006.
*Total excludes workers idled due to labor-management disputes.
BRIDGEPORT - STAMFORD LMA Civilian Labor Force 478,400 466,200 12,200 2.6 486,000
Employed 459,600 448,300 11,300 2.5 465,700
Unemployed 18,800 17,900 900 5.0 20,300
Unemployment Rate 3.9 3.8 0.1 --- 4.2
DANBURY LMA Civilian Labor Force 92,400 90,400 2,000 2.2 93,800
Employed 89,300 87,500 1,800 2.1 90,400
Unemployed 3,100 2,900 200 6.9 3,400
Unemployment Rate 3.4 3.2 0.2 --- 3.7
ENFIELD LMA Civilian Labor Force 50,000 49,100 900 1.8 49,400
Employed 47,800 47,000 800 1.7 47,300
Unemployed 2,300 2,100 200 9.5 2,100
Unemployment Rate 4.6 4.2 0.4 --- 4.2
HARTFORD LMA Civilian Labor Force 587,900 577,500 10,400 1.8 591,300
Employed 562,000 552,500 9,500 1.7 563,200
Unemployed 26,000 25,100 900 3.6 28,100
Unemployment Rate 4.4 4.3 0.1 --- 4.8
NEW HAVEN LMA Civilian Labor Force 312,300 307,600 4,700 1.5 312,900
Employed 298,000 293,700 4,300 1.5 297,500
Unemployed 14,400 13,900 500 3.6 15,400
Unemployment Rate 4.6 4.5 0.1 --- 4.9
NORWICH - NEW LONDON LMA Civilian Labor Force 153,000 150,800 2,200 1.5 155,900
Employed 146,900 144,700 2,200 1.5 149,400
Unemployed 6,100 6,000 100 1.7 6,500
Unemployment Rate 4.0 4.0 0.0 --- 4.2
TORRINGTON LMA Civilian Labor Force 56,600 55,000 1,600 2.9 56,800
Employed 54,500 53,000 1,500 2.8 54,500
Unemployed 2,100 2,000 100 5.0 2,300
Unemployment Rate 3.8 3.6 0.2 --- 4.1
WATERBURY LMA Civilian Labor Force 102,800 100,300 2,500 2.5 102,700
Employed 97,100 95,000 2,100 2.2 96,600
Unemployed 5,700 5,300 400 7.5 6,000
Unemployment Rate 5.5 5.3 0.2 --- 5.9
WILLIMANTIC-DANIELSON LMA Civilian Labor Force 58,300 56,900 1,400 2.5 58,700
Employed 55,300 54,000 1,300 2.4 55,800
Unemployed 3,000 2,900 100 3.4 3,000
Unemployment Rate 5.1 5.1 0.0 --- 5.1
UNITED STATES Civilian Labor Force 153,400,000 151,635,000 1,765,000 1.2 153,493,000
Employed 146,448,000 145,010,000 1,438,000 1.0 146,406,000
Unemployed 6,952,000 6,625,000 327,000 4.9 7,088,000
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.4 0.1 --- 4.6
Current months data are preliminary. Prior months data have been revised. All data are benchmarked to March 2006.
CONNECTICUT AVG WEEKLY EARNINGS AVG WEEKLY HOURS AVG HOURLY EARNINGS
SEP CHG AUG SEP CHG AUG SEP CHG AUG
/PUTFBTPOBMMZBEKVTUFE
2007 2006 Y/Y 2007 2007 2006 Y/Y 2007 2007 2006 Y/Y 2007
MANUFACTURING $890.77 $846.30 $44.46 $873.15 42.6 42.4 0.2 42.1 $20.91 $19.96 $0.95 $20.74
DURABLE GOODS 922.29 878.48 43.81 905.10 42.6 42.5 0.1 42.0 21.65 20.67 0.98 21.55
Fabricated Metal 806.60 788.80 17.80 808.74 42.7 42.8 -0.1 42.1 18.89 18.43 0.46 19.21
Machinery 862.69 835.58 27.11 851.95 41.1 40.8 0.3 40.9 20.99 20.48 0.51 20.83
Computer & Electronic 711.20 677.61 33.59 716.19 40.0 40.6 -0.6 40.1 17.78 16.69 1.09 17.86
Transport. Equipment 1,160.78 1,103.66 57.12 1,134.75 43.2 43.4 -0.2 42.5 26.87 25.43 1.44 26.70
NON-DUR. GOODS 803.25 763.94 39.31 784.08 42.5 42.3 0.2 42.2 18.90 18.06 0.84 18.58
CONSTRUCTION 964.71 913.74 50.97 943.20 39.2 38.8 0.4 39.3 24.61 23.55 1.06 24.00
LMAs AVG WEEKLY EARNINGS AVG WEEKLY HOURS AVG HOURLY EARNINGS
SEP CHG AUG SEP CHG AUG SEP CHG AUG
MANUFACTURING 2007 2006 Y/Y 2007 2007 2006 Y/Y 2007 2007 2006 Y/Y 2007
Bridgeport - Stamford $904.54 $929.63 -$25.09 $839.34 43.3 43.4 -0.1 41.8 $20.89 $21.42 -$0.53 $20.08
New Haven 844.57 742.00 102.57 794.63 38.6 42.4 -3.8 37.5 21.88 17.50 4.38 21.19
Norwich - New London 867.15 829.79 37.36 848.22 42.3 42.1 0.2 41.6 20.50 19.71 0.79 20.39
Due to constraints of the sample upon which estimates are made, manufacturing hours and earnings estimates for the Hartford and Waterbury labor market areas are
being suspended.
Current months data are preliminary. Prior months data have been revised. All data are benchmarked to March 2006.
n In September 2007, plans were unveiled to build a Hilton Hotel at the Norwich Marina. Construc-
tion will begin in 2008 and 200 new jobs will be created. On November 8th, Hilton Homewood
Suites will open in the former Bond Hotel in Hartford with 35 employees being hired. CT Biodiesel
plans to build a renewable energy plant in Suffield that would create 25 to 30 jobs.
n In September 2007, HP Hood announced plans to lay off 80 workers at its ice cream plant in
Suffield by November. Branford-based CuraGen, a developer of cancer drugs, will eliminate 15
jobs by the end of the year.
Business & Employment Changes Announced in the News Media lists start-ups, expansions, staff reductions, and
layoffs reported by the media, both current and future. The report provides company name, the number of workers
involved, date of the action, the principal product or service of the company, a brief synopsis of the action, and the
source and date of the media article. This publication is available in both HTML and PDF formats at the Connecticut
Department of Labor Web site, http://www.ctdol.state.ct.us/lmi/busemp.htm.
SEPTEMBER 2007
LMA/TOWNS LABOR FORCE EMPLOYED UNEMPLOYED % LMA/TOWNS LABOR FORCE EMPLOYED UNEMPLOYED %
BRIDGEPORT-STAMFORD HARTFORD cont....
478,402 459,573 18,829 3.9 Canton 5,725 5,559 166 2.9
Ansonia 10,173 9,591 582 5.7 Colchester 8,805 8,505 300 3.4
Bridgeport 63,417 59,304 4,113 6.5 Columbia 3,083 2,977 106 3.4
Darien 9,360 9,101 259 2.8 Coventry 7,086 6,813 273 3.9
Derby 6,999 6,641 358 5.1 Cromwell 7,894 7,614 280 3.5
Easton 3,837 3,717 120 3.1 East Granby 2,938 2,852 86 2.9
Fairfield 28,814 27,810 1,004 3.5 East Haddam 5,191 5,013 178 3.4
Greenwich 30,869 29,915 954 3.1 East Hampton 6,902 6,604 298 4.3
Milford 32,012 30,855 1,157 3.6 East Hartford 25,657 24,182 1,475 5.7
Monroe 10,828 10,466 362 3.3 Ellington 8,695 8,415 280 3.2
New Canaan 9,089 8,832 257 2.8 Farmington 13,070 12,580 490 3.7
Newtown 14,516 14,099 417 2.9 Glastonbury 18,421 17,834 587 3.2
Norwalk 49,400 47,621 1,779 3.6 Granby 6,329 6,123 206 3.3
Oxford 7,018 6,777 241 3.4 Haddam 4,825 4,679 146 3.0
Redding 4,624 4,508 116 2.5 Hartford 48,863 44,815 4,048 8.3
Ridgefield 11,983 11,637 346 2.9 Hartland 1,211 1,176 35 2.9
Seymour 9,332 8,910 422 4.5 Harwinton 3,191 3,073 118 3.7
Shelton 22,962 22,076 886 3.9 Hebron 5,554 5,353 201 3.6
Southbury 9,221 8,892 329 3.6 Lebanon 4,341 4,195 146 3.4
Stamford 67,730 65,356 2,374 3.5 Manchester 32,179 30,841 1,338 4.2
Stratford 26,501 25,315 1,186 4.5 Mansfield 13,083 12,613 470 3.6
Trumbull 18,277 17,640 637 3.5 Marlborough 3,626 3,512 114 3.1
Weston 4,999 4,877 122 2.4 Middlefield 2,402 2,320 82 3.4
Westport 12,929 12,534 395 3.1 Middletown 26,769 25,608 1,161 4.3
Wilton 8,511 8,258 253 3.0 New Britain 34,937 32,665 2,272 6.5
Woodbridge 5,001 4,840 161 3.2 New Hartford 3,835 3,696 139 3.6
Newington 16,788 16,162 626 3.7
DANBURY 92,397 89,296 3,101 3.4 Plainville 10,176 9,756 420 4.1
Bethel 11,002 10,672 330 3.0 Plymouth 6,918 6,584 334 4.8
Bridgewater 1,057 1,023 34 3.2 Portland 5,414 5,200 214 4.0
Brookfield 9,180 8,850 330 3.6 Rocky Hill 10,810 10,425 385 3.6
Danbury 44,673 43,133 1,540 3.4 Simsbury 12,222 11,843 379 3.1
New Fairfield 7,722 7,466 256 3.3 Southington 24,351 23,429 922 3.8
New Milford 16,572 16,031 541 3.3 South Windsor 14,920 14,437 483 3.2
Sherman 2,190 2,121 69 3.2 Stafford 6,889 6,612 277 4.0
Thomaston 4,685 4,481 204 4.4
ENFIELD 50,049 47,770 2,279 4.6 Tolland 8,398 8,144 254 3.0
East Windsor 6,202 5,939 263 4.2 Union 470 459 11 2.3
Enfield 24,489 23,289 1,200 4.9 Vernon 17,430 16,687 743 4.3
Somers 4,796 4,572 224 4.7 West Hartford 29,757 28,572 1,185 4.0
Suffield 7,416 7,131 285 3.8 Wethersfield 13,510 12,995 515 3.8
Windsor Locks 7,148 6,840 308 4.3 Willington 3,948 3,833 115 2.9
Windsor 16,291 15,616 675 4.1
HARTFORD 587,930 561,958 25,972 4.4
Andover 1,997 1,939 58 2.9
All Labor Market Areas(LMAs) in Connecticut except three are federally-designated areas for developing labor
Ashford 2,628 2,541 87 3.3 statistics. For the sake of simplicity, the federal Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk NECTA is referred to in Connecticut
Avon 9,256 8,984 272 2.9 DOL publications as the ’Bridgeport-Stamford LMA’, and the Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford NECTA is
Barkhamsted 2,246 2,168 78 3.5 referred to as the ’Hartford LMA’. The Bureau of Labor Statistics has identified 17 towns in the northwest part of
Berlin 11,092 10,718 374 3.4 the State as a separate area for reporting labor force data. For the convenience of our data users, these towns are
included in the Torrington LMA. For the same purpuse, five towns which are part of the Springfield, MA area are
Bloomfield 10,126 9,612 514 5.1
published as the ’Enfield LMA’. Similarly the towns of Putnam, Thompson and Woodstock (part of the Worcester,
Bolton 3,089 2,994 95 3.1 MA area), plus four towns estimated separately are included in the Willimantic-Danielson LMA.
Bristol 34,527 32,941 1,586 4.6
Burlington 5,380 5,209 171 3.2
SEPTEMBER 2007
LMA/TOWNS LABOR FORCE EMPLOYED UNEMPLOYED % LMA/TOWNS LABOR FORCE EMPLOYED UNEMPLOYED %
NEW HAVEN 312,323 297,965 14,358 4.6 TORRINGTON 56,590 54,459 2,131 3.8
Bethany 3,123 3,008 115 3.7 Bethlehem 2,113 2,044 69 3.3
Branford 17,508 16,836 672 3.8 Canaan 631 611 20 3.2
Cheshire 14,809 14,288 521 3.5 Colebrook 868 848 20 2.3
Chester 2,292 2,223 69 3.0 Cornwall 862 843 19 2.2
Clinton 8,003 7,730 273 3.4 Goshen 1,658 1,600 58 3.5
Deep River 2,609 2,521 88 3.4 Kent 1,664 1,613 51 3.1
Durham 4,256 4,121 135 3.2 Litchfield 4,579 4,412 167 3.6
East Haven 16,282 15,479 803 4.9 Morris 1,373 1,314 59 4.3
Essex 3,824 3,702 122 3.2 Norfolk 996 961 35 3.5
Guilford 13,079 12,664 415 3.2 North Canaan 1,813 1,745 68 3.8
Hamden 31,192 29,838 1,354 4.3 Roxbury 1,433 1,393 40 2.8
Killingworth 3,598 3,501 97 2.7 Salisbury 2,085 2,025 60 2.9
Madison 10,164 9,873 291 2.9 Sharon 1,637 1,594 43 2.6
Meriden 31,879 30,205 1,674 5.3 Torrington 20,133 19,243 890 4.4
New Haven 56,154 52,284 3,870 6.9 Warren 766 739 27 3.5
North Branford 8,428 8,110 318 3.8 Washington 2,025 1,964 61 3.0
North Haven 13,195 12,705 490 3.7 Winchester 6,224 5,955 269 4.3
Old Saybrook 5,521 5,328 193 3.5 Woodbury 5,728 5,553 175 3.1
Orange 7,396 7,156 240 3.2
Wallingford 25,458 24,480 978 3.8 WATERBURY 102,788 97,107 5,681 5.5
Westbrook 3,687 3,569 118 3.2 Beacon Falls 3,312 3,164 148 4.5
West Haven 29,868 28,346 1,522 5.1 Middlebury 3,869 3,732 137 3.5
Naugatuck 17,402 16,636 766 4.4
*NORWICH-NEW LONDON Prospect 5,373 5,172 201 3.7
139,669 134,040 5,629 4.0 Waterbury 51,019 47,478 3,541 6.9
Bozrah 1,512 1,440 72 4.8 Watertown 12,645 12,129 516 4.1
Canterbury 3,233 3,097 136 4.2 Wolcott 9,170 8,797 373 4.1
East Lyme 9,757 9,441 316 3.2
Franklin 1,208 1,169 39 3.2 WILLIMANTIC-DANIELSON
Griswold 7,223 6,910 313 4.3 58,253 55,300 2,953 5.1
Groton 20,211 19,411 800 4.0 Brooklyn 3,905 3,715 190 4.9
Ledyard 8,711 8,426 285 3.3 Chaplin 1,442 1,390 52 3.6
Lisbon 2,632 2,527 105 4.0 Eastford 992 966 26 2.6
Lyme 1,176 1,139 37 3.1 Hampton 1,192 1,143 49 4.1
Montville 11,082 10,623 459 4.1 Killingly 9,560 9,026 534 5.6
New London 13,882 13,133 749 5.4 Plainfield 8,573 8,117 456 5.3
No. Stonington 3,314 3,220 94 2.8 Pomfret 2,311 2,232 79 3.4
Norwich 21,038 20,003 1,035 4.9 Putnam 5,289 5,014 275 5.2
Old Lyme 4,316 4,187 129 3.0 Scotland 1,002 979 23 2.3
Preston 2,887 2,787 100 3.5 Sterling 2,023 1,931 92 4.5
Salem 2,649 2,565 84 3.2 Thompson 5,473 5,203 270 4.9
Sprague 1,828 1,737 91 5.0 Windham 11,809 11,090 719 6.1
Stonington 10,703 10,379 324 3.0 Woodstock 4,682 4,494 188 4.0
Voluntown 1,649 1,577 72 4.4
Waterford 10,655 10,267 388 3.6
*Connecticut portion only. For whole NECTA, including Rhode Island town, see below. Not Seasonally Adjusted:
NORWICH-NEW LONDON CONNECTICUT 1,878,400 1,797,500 80,900 4.3
153,032 146,944 6,088 4.0 UNITED STATES 153,400,000 146,448,000 6,952,000 4.5
Westerly, RI 13,363 12,904 459 3.4
Labor Force estimates are prepared following statistical procedures developed Seasonally Adjusted:
by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. CONNECTICUT 1,891,100 1,805,700 85,400 4.5
UNITED STATES 153,464,000 146,257,000 7,207,000 4.7
For further information on the housing permit data, contact Kolie Sun of DECD at (860) 270-8167.
INITIAL CLAIMS
Average weekly initial claims are calculated by dividing the total number of new claims for unemployment insurance received in the month by
the number of weeks in the month. A minor change in methodology took effect with data published in the March 1997 issue of the DIGEST.
Data have been revised back to January 1980.
UI COVERED WAGES
UI covered wages is the total amount paid to those employees who are covered under the Connecticuts Unemployment Insurance (UI) law for
services performed during the quarter. The fluctuations in the 1992-93 period reflect the effect of the changes in the tax law and the massive
restructuring in the states economy.
Leading Employment Index .......... +0.5 Business Activity Tourism and Travel
Coincident Employment Index ...... +0.9 New Housing Permits ................... -31.0 Info Center Visitors ......................... -8.2
Leading General Drift Indicator ..... +0.2 Electricity Sales ............................... -1.0 Attraction Visitors ......................... +10.1
Coincident General Drift Indicator +1.8 Retail Sales .................................... -0.6 Air Passenger Count ....................... -2.4
Banknorth Business Barometer ... +1.7 Construction Contracts Index ........ -46.6 Indian Gaming Slots ........................ -1.2
New Auto Registrations ................ +19.2 Travel and Tourism Index .............. +2.0
Total Nonfarm Employment .......... +1.2 Air Cargo Tons ................................ -6.3
Exports .......................................... +7.9 Employment Cost Index (U.S.)
Unemployment Rate ...................... +0.1 Total .............................................. +3.1
Labor Force ................................... +2.0 Business Starts Wages & Salaries .......................... +3.4
Employed ....................................... +1.9 Secretary of the State ..................... -6.9 Benefit Costs ................................. +2.4
Unemployed .................................. +3.8 Dept. of Labor ............................... -11.3
Consumer Prices
Average Weekly Initial Claims ........ -2.2 Business Terminations U.S. City Average .......................... +2.8
Help Wanted Index -- Hartford ........ -9.1 Secretary of the State .................. +11.6 Northeast Region ........................... +2.4
Avg Insured Unempl. Rate .......... -0.19* Dept. of Labor ............................... -32.8 NY-NJ-Long Island ......................... +2.4
Boston-Brockton-Nashua ............... +1.5
Average Weekly Hours, Mfg .......... +0.5
Average Hourly Earnings, Mfg ...... +4.8 State Revenues .............................. +4.6 Consumer Confidence
Average Weekly Earnings, Mfg ..... +5.3 Corporate Tax ................................ -17.5 Connecticut ...................................... NA
CT Mfg. Production Index .............. +3.7 Personal Income Tax .................... +12.3 New England ................................... NA
Production Worker Hours ................ -1.0 Real Estate Conveyance Tax ........... -7.8 U.S. ................................................. NA
Industrial Electricity Sales .............. +3.1 Sales & Use Tax .............................. -3.2
Indian Gaming Payments ................. -1.8 Interest Rates
Personal Income ............................ +1.7 *Percentage point change; **Less than 0.05 percent;
Prime ........................................... -0.22*
UI Covered Wages .......................... -1.8 NA = Not Available Conventional Mortgage ................ -0.02*
THE CONNECTICUT
ECONOMIC DIGEST
NEED A COPY OF THE CONNECTICUT ECONOMIC DIGEST?
To receive a staple-bound, color copy of the Digest each month,
A joint publication of please download the subscription order form at
The Connecticut Departments of Labor and http://www.ctdol.state.ct.us/lmi/misc/ctdigest.htm
Economic and Community Development For further information, please call the Office of Research at (860)
263-6290, or send an e-mail to dol.econdigest@ct.gov.
q If you wish to have your name removed from our mailing list, please
check here and return this page (or a photocopy) to the address at left.
q If your address has changed, please check here, make the necessary
changes to your address label and return this page to the address at left.
Mailing address: q If you receive more than one copy of this publication, please check
here and return this page from the duplicate copy to the address at left.
Connecticut Economic Digest
Connecticut Department of Labor
Office of Research
200 Folly Brook Boulevard
Wethersfield, CT 06109-1114