Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
AUGUST 2013
CAPITOL RESEARCH
INTERSTATE COMPACTS
The Supreme Court upheld the lower court ruling this summer in what is being hailed as a significant victory for interstate compacts. In the ruling, the Su-
preme Court concluded that Tarrant was not entitled to the water in question. The decision, written by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, was based on three factors, Three things persuade the Court that the Compact did not grant cross-border rights: the well-established principle that States do not easily cede their sovereign powers; the fact that other interstate water compacts have treated cross-border rights explicitly; and the parties course of dealing.3 The Courts decision reaffirms the contractual nature of interstate compacts, said Rick Masters, who serves as special counsel to The Council of State Governments National Center for Interstate Compacts. The ruling validates that compacts are protected by the contract clause of the Constitution and will be enforced according to the express terms of each such agreement. Other water resource management compacts were watching the courts ruling closely. In fact, the most common use of the compact mechanism is to manage shared natural resources such as water. Forty-four active interstate compacts are responsible for managing water resources, with 27 of those pertaining directly to the management of rivers or river basins. Masters noted, however, that he did not think the ruling would significantly impact similar compacts.
1
The Courts analysis makes clear that the compact language must explicitly provide for cross border access and such authority will not be implied. In this instance, it was clear from the compact language the extent to which Tarrant was entitled to access water from the Red River, he said. Masters concluded that the Tarrant claim simply exceeded what was permissible under the terms of the agreement. In addition to the impact on interstate compacts, this case also was being watched closely for its impact on rapidly growing metro areas. The Dallas-Fort Worth area, which currently has more than 6.5 million residents, is the fastest growing metro area in the country according to the 2011 Census. Engineers from the Tarrant Regional Water District estimate that north Texas, which includes the Dallas-Fort Worth area, must double its water supply by 2050. In fact, the Obama administration encouraged the Supreme Court to hear the case largely because of concerns over water shortages in rapidly growing areas.
While reaffirming the contractual nature of interstate compacts, the case also seems to protect individual state sovereignty. One of the major issues state legislators must address when considering any interstate agreement is the question of state sovereignty. Language protecting a member states right to regulate resources within its boundaries is common across interstate compacts; it is especially prevalent in water resource compacts and is intended to address state sovereignty concerns. By upholding the lower courts ruling, the Supreme Court has ensured that states can enter into interstate compacts while also maintaining and protecting individual state sovereignty. With approximately 215 active interstate compacts, including approximately 40 water resource management compacts, the high courts decision is a significant victory for state policymakers and interstate compacts.
Crady deGolian, Director, CSGs National Center for Interstate Compacts cdegolian@csg.org RESOURCES
The Red River Compact, http://apps.csg.org/ncic/PDF/Red%20River%20Compact.pdf The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca10/106184/10-6184-2011-09-07.pdf?1315440296 3 Supreme Court of the United States Blog, http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/tarrant-regional-water-district-v-herrmann/
1 2
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES:
The National Center for Interstate Compacts | http://www.csg.org/ncic/ The U.S. Supreme Court, Tarrant Regional Water District v. Herrmann et al. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/11-889_5ie6.pdf The Red River Compact | http://apps.csg.org/ncic/PDF/Red%20River%20Compact.pdf